异构分布式实时系统的容错优化调度算法

针对分布式实时系统,在分析了单处理调度算法的基础上,结合版本复制技术和首次适应方法,给出了一种容错调度算法。分析了算法的可调度性,给出任务的可调度性条件。在满足任务容错可调度的情况下,以提高处理器的利用率为目标,对基版本时限进行了优化,给出了基版本优化时限的求取算法。仿真结果表明,本文算法将可以得到比FTEDFFF和FTRMFF更高的处理器利用率。     

基于GA的DCS中任务的容错优化调度

分布式控制系统(DCS)中的实时任务必须在其时限前完成,否则会出现灾难性后果,因此必须为DCS提供一定的容错能力。该文基于EDF算法和版本复制技术给出了DCS的容错调度算法。在此基础上采用启发式任务分配算法分配任务,通过遗传算法对基版本任务时限进行优化,以提高处理器的利用率。仿真结果表明该算法是有效的。     

基于EDF的分布式控制系统容错调度算法

现有的分布式实时系统的容错调度算法要求系统中所有任务的周期相同且等于其时限,而实际中任务的周期常常是互不相同的.根据控制系统中任务的特点,结合任务分配算法与处理器的调度算法,提出了基于基版本/副版本技术和EDF算法的容错调度算法.该算法不要求任务的周期都相同,并通过设置基版本/副版本任务时限控制它们的执行时间不重叠,给出了基版本/副版本任务时限的设置方法,并对任务集的可调度性进行了分析.当任务集可调度时,给出其最大利用率和最小处理器个数的约束条件.最后给出一个仿真实例,结果表明了算法的有效性.     

一种新的异构实时分布式系统的容错调度算法

一般来说,异构分布式实时系统中任务的周期并不完全相同且任务的时限不等于它们的周期,同时系统中还有一些无容错需求的任务.因此现有的任务调度算法一般不能满足这些要求.针对这类系统,在结合基版本/副版本技术和EDF算法的基础上,给出了一种新的容错调度算法.该算法由两部分组成：任务分配调度算法和单处理器调度算法.对于单处理器调度算法,本文采用了EDF算法;在此基础上,给出一种启发式静态任务分配算法.分析了系统的可调度性,给出了任务可调度条件和基版本/副版本时限的设置方法.仿真结果表明,这种算法是有效的.     

异构分布式控制系统中实时任务的调度算法

分布式控制系统是一种应用极为广泛的异构分布式实时系统，系统中同时存在有多种实时任务，如何将这些任务分配到各个处理器上并保证它们的时限是系统关键技术之一．在结合启发式任务分配算法和单处理器任务调度算法的基础上，提出了一种分布式控制系统的调度算法．该算法考虑了各个处理器的负载均衡，同时又能满足所有任务的时限．仿真结果表明了算法的有效性．     

多处理机系统的一种实时容错调度算法

实时容错调度算法是实时系统容错研究中的重要问题.提出了一种多处理机系统的实时任务容错调度算法.该算法结合了基版本/副版本(Primary/Backup)方法和三模冗余(TMR)方法,以保证在一个节点机失效时,任务可以在其截止时限内完成.     

基于EDF的分布式系统实时容错调度算法

将分布式系统的任务分配算法与处理器局部调度算法相结合，提出一种主动备份的、基于EDF的分布式系统实时容错调度算法，其特点是主／副版本执行时间可以重叠。给出了该调度算法的任务集可调度的充分条件、任务集可调度所需最小处理器个数的计算方法。模拟结果比较了主动备份容错调度算法与被动备份容错调度算法，结果表明卞动备份算法效率更优。     

主桙副版本模型中预分配容错实时调度算法

实时系统中任务的超时完成可能导致灾难性后果,因此要求系统具备容错处理能力,以保证系统出错后的实时性及可靠性。主/副版本模型是提高实时系统容错能力的有效技术。传统的容错实时调度算法通过为副版本预留处理器时间来实现软件容错,为副版本预留的处理器时间在系统运行过程中需动态调整,增加了系统的容错调度开销。提出一种基于res‐backw ards‐RM 预分配子算法的容错实时调度算法BCE*,通过限制预分配过程中高优先级任务的抢占条件,在不影响系统可调度性的同时可以有效避免副版本预留时间的动态调整,降低系统的容错调度开销。仿真实验验证了BC E*算法的可行性及有效性,且在系统出错概率及主版本负载较低的环境下,BC E*算法对系统容错调度开销的优化效果更显著。     

异构分布式系统混合型实时容错调度算法

基/副版本技术是实现实时分布式系统容错的一个重要手段。提出了一种异构分布式混合型容错模型,该模型与传统的异构分布式实时调度模型相比同时考虑了周期和非周期调度任务。在此基础上给出3种容错调度算法:以可调度性为目的SSA算法、以可靠性为目的RSA算法、以负载均衡性为目的BSA算法。算法能够在异构系统中同时调度具有周期和非周期容错需求的实时任务,且能够保证在异构系统中某节点机失效情况下,实时任务仍然能在截止时间内完成。最后从可调度性、可靠性代价、负载均衡性、周期与非周期任务数及任务周期与粒度J个方面对算法进行了分析。模拟实验结果显示算法各有优缺点,所以在选择调度算法时应该根据异构系统的特点来选择。     

NFRL:一种分布系统的实时容错调度算法

在硬实时系统的应用中,如果硬实时任务不能在规定的时限完成,将会产生人员伤亡, 失等严重后果,为了保证在系统出错的情况下,硬实时任务仍然在能戴止时限之前完成,必须研究实时容错技术。本文从实时容错调度算法的角度出发,提出一种基于分布式系统的实时容错调度算法,并研究了该算法的时间复杂度,同时给出一个实例说明该容错调度算法的调度过程。这种容错调算法称为“无容错需求后调度算法（ＮＦＲＬ）,该实时容错调度算法     

Sensitivity analysis of arbitrary deadline real-time systems with EDF scheduling

The correctness of a real-time system depends on not only the system’s output but also on the time at which results are produced. A hard real-time system is required to complete its operations before all its timing deadlines. For a given task set it is useful to know what changes can be made to a task that will result in a system that is borderline schedulable. It is also beneficial in an engineering context to know the minimum speed of a processor that will deliver a schedulable system. We address the following sensitivity analysis (parameter computations) for EDF-scheduled systems on a uniprocessor: task execution times, speed of the processor, task periods and task relative deadlines. We prove that an optimal (minimum or maximum) system parameter can be determined by a single run of the Quick convergence Processor demand Analysis (QPA) algorithm. This algorithm provides efficient and exact sensitivity analysis for arbitrary deadline real-time systems. We also improve the implementation of this sensitivity analysis by using various starting values for the algorithms. The approaches developed for task parameter computations are therefore as efficient as QPA, and are easily incorporated into a system design support tool.     

Hartstone Uniprocessor Benchmark: Definitions and experiments for real-time systems

The purpose of this paper is to define a series of requirements and associated experiments called the Hartstone Uniprocessor Benchmark (HUB), to be used in testing the ability of a uniprocessor system to handle certain types of hard real-time applications. The benchmark model considers the real-time system as a set of periodic, aperiodic (sporadic), and synchronization (server) tasks. The tasks are characterized by their execution times (workloads), and deadlines. There are five series of experiments defined. They are, in order of increasing complexity, PH (Periodic Tasks, Harmonic Frequencies), PN (Periodic Tasks, Nonharmonic Frequencies), AH (Periodic Tasks with Aperiodic Processing), SH (Periodic Tasks with Synchronization), and SA (Periodic Tasks with Aperiodic Processing and Synchronization). The general stopping criteria of the experiments is defined as follows: Change one of the following four task set parameters: number of tasks, execution time(s), blocking time(s), or deadline(s) until a given task set is no longer schedulable, i.e., a deadline is missed. The derivation of the Hartstone experiments from one static scheduling algorithm (Rate Monotonic) and one dynamic scheduling algorithm (Earliest Deadline First) is presented. Because of its high-level application view of the underlying hardware and real-time system software the Hartstone experiments can be used for fast prototyping of real-time applications. Implementation of such benchmarks is useful in evaluating scheduling algorithms, scheduling protocols, and design paradigms, as well as evaluating real-time languages, the tasking system of compilers, real-time operating systems, and hardware configurations.     

Aperiodic servers in a deadline scheduling environment

A real-time system may have tasks with soft deadlines, as well as hard deadlines. While earliest-deadline-first scheduling is effective for hard-deadline tasks, applying it to soft-deadline tasks may waste schedulable processor capacity or sacrifice average response time. Better average response time may be obtained, while still guaranteeing hard deadlines, with an aperiodic server. Three scheduling algorithms for aperiodic servers are described, and schedulability tests are derived for them. A simulation provides performance data for these three algorithms on random aperiodic tasks. The performances of the deadline aperiodic servers are compared with those of several alternatives, including background service, a deadline polling server, and rate-monotonic servers, and with estimates based on the M/M/1 queueing model. This adds to the evidence in support of deadline scheduling,versus fixed priority scheduling.     

An efficient approach for the multiprocessor non-preemptive strictly periodic task scheduling problem

Strict periodicity constraint is of great importance since it concerns some hard real-time systems where missing deadlines leads to catastrophic situations. However, the problem of schedulability analysis for non-preemptive strictly periodic tasks on a multiprocessor platform is even more intractable than the one with the common periodicity. In order to implement such systems, designers need effective tools based on fast and near-optimal solutions.This paper presents a schedulability analysis which results mainly in a, two versions, task assignment and start-time calculation algorithm. The first one targets the harmonic task periods case while the second one targets the non-harmonic task periods case. Each version is based on a sufficient uniprocessor schedulability test. In addition, for the non-harmonic case which is the most intractable, the uniprocessor sufficient schedulability test uses the strictly periodic task utilization factor. This factor stands for the fraction of time spent to execute a task while its strict periodicity and the ones of the already scheduled tasks are met. As a result, an efficient and easily implementable scheduling algorithm is proposed which begins by assigning tasks to processors then attributes a start-time to every task in such a way that strict periodicity and deadline constraints are met. The effectiveness of the proposed scheduling algorithm, in both versions, has been shown by a performance evaluation and comparisons with an optimal and a similar suboptimal solution.     

Real-time preemptive scheduling of sporadic tasks based on supervisory control of discrete event systems

This paper presents a preemptive scheduling scheme for real-time systems with sporadic tasks based on the supervisory control theory of discrete event systems. In particular, we present a systematic method of computing a schedulable language that includes all achievable sequences that meet the given deadlines of accepted sporadic tasks. A supervisor that achieves the schedulable language corresponds to a scheduler that can secure the deadlines of all accepted tasks. We further show that the schedulable language includes the decisions on whether a scheduler accepts or rejects a newly arrived sporadic task.     

Fault-Tolerant Scheduling for Real-Time Embedded Control Systems

With the increasing complexity of industrial application, an embedded control system (ECS) requires processing a number of hard real-time tasks and needs fault-tolerance to assure high reliability. Considering the characteristics of real-time tasks in ECS, an integrated algorithm is proposed to schedule real-time tasks and to guarantee that all real-time tasks are completed before their deadlines even in the presence of faults. Based on the nonpreemptive critical-section protocol (NCSP), this paper analyzes the blocking time introduced by resource conflicts of relevancy tasks in fault-tolerant multiprocessor systems. An extended schedulability condition is presented to check the assignment feasibility of a given task to a processor. A primary/backup approach and on-line replacement of failed processors are used to tolerate processor failures. The analysis reveals that the integrated algorithm bounds the blocking time, requires limited overhead on the number of processors, and still assures good processor utilization. This is also demonstrated by simulation results. Both analysis and simulation show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in ECS.