首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Conducted a systematic survey of Canadian clinical psychology programs to examine the extent and nature of diversity. Diversity was defined broadly as reflecting the vast number of possible individual differences (e.g., culture, nationality, ethnicity, colour, race, gender, religion, sexual preference, disability, economic disadvantage) that can affect clinical psychology knowledge, research, and practice. 20 Directors of Clinical Training (DCTs) at Canadian clinical psychology programs were asked about the extent to which various aspects of diversity training were deemed important or essential to their program, what training activities were required, and how effective different methods of training were viewed. The results revealed that DCTs varied widely in their opinion of how important diversity materials were, and that few programs require many different methods of training related to diversity. Further, the training methods more commonly adopted did not generally relate well with those that were seen as being most effective. Implications of the survey for training in clinical psychology are provided. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

2.
Presents data for estimating the chances for acceptance to PhD programs in various fields of psychology. Data were obtained from a study by C. M. Stoup and L. T. Benjamin, Jr. (see record 1983-24200-001). It is concluded that reasonably well-qualified students are almost certain to be accepted into some graduate program. Implications for advising undergraduates are discussed. (4 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

3.
Comments on J. H. Korn's (see record 1984-32529-001) data on the odds of gaining acceptance to PhD programs in psychology. The present author attempts to demonstrate that Korn's candidate/acceptance ratio is an inaccurate and misleading statistic that underestimates the severity of competition for admission to graduate programs and suggests some alternative ways to roughly estimate the amount of competition. It is argued that Korn failed to consider in his ratios that an individual's chances of getting into graduate school depend on a number of factors such as grades, test scores, recommendations, and ability to write convincing personal statements. (7 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

4.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical and in psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed… ." Of the 47 institutions indicated in the clinical psychology list, six are asterisked to indicate that the institutions have recently developed programs which meet minimum standards. Of the 25 institutions in the counseling psychology list, seven have been asterisked. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

5.
A list of the APA approved training programs in clinical and counseling psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

6.
7.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical psychology and in counseling psychology" conducted by the institutions listed. Under "Doctoral Programs in Clinical Psychology" 57 institutions are listed; 7 of these have interim approval while the others are undifferentiated by any rating. Under "Doctoral Programs in Counseling Psychology" 24 institutions are listed; 1 of these has interim approval. From Psyc Abstracts 36:02:2AM12A. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

8.
"On recommendation of the Committee on Evaluation, the Education and Training Board with the concurrence of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical psychology and in counseling psychology" conducted by the institutions listed. Under "Doctoral Programs in Clinical Psychology" 52 institutions are listed; 10 of these are indicated as having received interim approval while the others are undifferentiated by any rating. Under "Doctoral Programs in Counseling Psychology" 26 institutions are listed; 7 of these have interim approval. The institutions listed "have been reported to the United States Public Health Service, to the Veterans Administration, and to The Surgeon General's Office, Department of the Army as conducting at the present time approved programs of doctoral training in areas indicated." (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

9.
10.
Examined dissertation policies and practices in 40 Vail-model, clinical psychology programs. A survey of their training directors revealed that 90% of programs required a dissertation, but only 25% dictated that the dissertation be empirical. Traditional experimental and correlational designs accounted for 66% of completed dissertations, and 34% reflected less traditional methodologies. All but the dissertation (ABD) rates averaged 24% 2 yrs after students' expected graduation. Dissertation methodologies were unrelated to ABD rates. Results were discussed with regard to potential obstacles to dissertation research and the need for training programs to encourage appropriate and innovative methodologies to answer relevant questions in the field of clinical psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

11.
Lists the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that were approved by the American Psychological Association Committee on Accreditation for the year 1977. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

12.
The Committee on Accreditation has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology. In the institutions listed in this article, the approved programs are directed by the department of psychology unless otherwise indicated. Programs that have not requested evaluation, and programs that have been evaluated but not approved, are not included in the list. Readers desiring information on training goals and approaches of specific programs are encouraged to write directly to the department in which the programs are offered. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the Accreditation Office. Inclusion of an institution in this list indicates approval of doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology only, Inclusion or noninclusion carries no implications for other graduate programs in psychology or for programs of graduate education in other disciplines. Combined professional-scientific psychology is a new area of accreditation for programs that do not clearly fit the model for separate programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology. This area of accreditation is defined as a combination of clinical, counseling, and/or school psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

13.
The Committee on Accreditation has accredited the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed below. In the institutions listed, the accredited programs are directed by the department of psychology unless otherwise indicated. All programs, unless otherwise noted, are PhD programs. Programs that have not requested evaluation, and programs that have been evaluated but not accredited, are not included in the list. Readers desiring information on training goals and approaches of specific programs are encouraged to write directly to the departments in which the programs are offered. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the Accreditation Office. There are three categories of accreditation. Full accreditation is awarded to any program that, in the professional judgment of the committee, meets the criteria in a satisfactory manner. Provisional accreditation is awarded to programs making initial application that, in the professional judgment of the committee, do not meet all the criteria but for which the committee believes there is a reasonable expectation that they will be met within a foreseeable period of time from the date of the initial site visit. Probation is the category into which a fully accredited program is placed when the committee has evidence that the program is not currently in satisfactory compliance with the criteria. Inclusion of an institution in this list indicates accreditation of doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

14.
Requirements for admission, institutional facilities and stipends, advice to applicants for financial assistance, and postdoctoral arrangements are discussed. Digests of information on graduate training in psychology relevant to prospective students are presented for 189 colleges and universities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

15.
The Committee on Accreditation has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed. In the institutions listed, the approved programs are directed by the department of psychology unless otherwise indicated. Inclusion of an institution in this list indicates approval of doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, school, and combined professional-scientific psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

16.
Presents a list of institutions conducting doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that have been approved by the American Psychological Association Committee on Accreditation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

17.
On the recommendation of the Committee on Accreditation, the Education and Training Board has recommended and the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association has approved the doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

18.
The Committee on Accreditation has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed below. In the institutions listed, the approved programs are directed by the department of psychology unless otherwise indicated. Programs that have not requested evaluation, and programs that have been evaluated but not approved, are not included in the list. Readers desiring information on training goals and approaches of specific programs are encouraged to write directly to the department in which the programs are offered. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the Accreditation Office. Inclusion of an institution in this list indicates approval of doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology only. Inclusion or noninclusion carries no implications for other graduate programs in psychology or for programs of graduate education in other disciplines. The institutions listed below have been reported to the U.S. Public Health Service, to the Veterans Administration, and to the Surgeon General's Office, Department of the Army, as conducting at the present time approved programs of doctoral training in the areas indicated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

19.
Presents a list of institutions conducting doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are approved by the American Psychological Associations's Committee on Accreditation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

20.
The Committee on Accreditation has approved the doctoral training programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology that are conducted by the institutions listed below. In the institutions listed, the approved programs are directed by the department of psychology unless otherwise indicated. Programs that have not requested evaluation, and programs that have been evaluated but not approved, are not included in the list. The criteria for evaluating these programs can be obtained from the Educational Affairs Office. The Committee on Accreditation has dropped the "initial" category of accreditation. Therefore, programs that meet all of the criteria, including newly approved programs, are classified as fully approved. Inclusion of an institution in this list indicates approval of doctoral programs in clinical, counseling, and school psychology only. Inclusion or noninclusion carries no implications for other graduate programs in psychology or for programs of graduate education in other disciplines. The institutions listed below have been reported to the United States Public Health Service, to the Veterans Administration, and to the Surgeon General's Office, Department of the Army, as conducting at the present time approved programs of doctoral training in the areas indicated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号