Crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene octene) blends: Isothermal crystallization

Poly(ethylene‐octene) (POE), maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene‐octene) (mPOE), and a mixture of POE and mPOE were added to poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) to prepare PBT/POE, PBT/mPOE, and PBT/mPOE/POE blends by a twin‐screw extruder. Observation by scanning electron microscopy revealed improved compatibility between PBT and POE in the presence of maleic anhydride groups. The melting behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimeter; the kinetics data was delineated by kinetic models. The addition of POE or mPOE did not affect the melting behavior of PBT in samples quenched in water after blending in an extrude. Subsequent DSC scans of isothermally crystallized PBT and PBT blends exhibited two melting endotherms (T_mI and T_mII). T_mI was the fusion of the crystals grown by normal primary crystallization and T_mII was the melting peak of the most perfect crystals after reorganization. The dispersed second phase hindered the crystallization; on the other hand, the well dispersed phases with smaller size enhanced crystallization because of higher nucleation density. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Influences of ethylene–butylacrylate–glycidyl methacrylate on morphology and mechanical properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/polyolefin elastomer blends

Elastomer ethylene–butylacrylate–glycidyl methacrylate (PTW) containing epoxy groups were chosen as toughening modifier for poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/polyolefin elastomer (POE) blend. The morphology, thermal, and mechanical properties of the PBT/POE/PTW blend were studied. The infrared spectra of the blends proved that small parts of epoxy groups of PTW reacted with carboxylic acid or hydroxyl groups in PBT during melt blending, resulting in a grafted structure which tended to increase the viscosity and interfere with the crystallization process of the blend. The morphology observed by scanning electron microscopy revealed the dispersed POE particles were well distributed and the interaction between POE and PBT increased in the PBT/POE/PTW blends. Mechanical properties showed the addition of PTW could lead to a remarkable increase about 10‐times in impact strength with a small reduction in tensile strength of PBT/POE blends. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed with increasing PTW, the crystallization temperature (T_c) and crystallinity (X_c) decreased while the melting point (T_m) slightly increased. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis spectra indicated that the presence of PTW could improve the compatibility of PBT/POE blends. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40660.     

Toughening effects of poly(butylene terephthalate) with blocked isocyanate‐functionalized poly(ethylene octene)

BACKGROUND: Blocked isocyanate‐functionalized polyolefins have great potential for use in semicrystalline polymer blends to obtain toughened polymers. In this study, poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) was blended with allyl N‐[2‐methyl‐4‐(2‐oxohexahydroazepine‐1‐carboxamido)phenyl] carbamate‐functionalized poly(ethylene octene) (POE‐g‐AMPC). RESULTS: New peaks at 2272 and 1720 cm^?1, corresponding to the stretching vibrations of NCO and the carbonyl of NH? CO? N, respectively, in AMPC, appeared in the infrared spectrum of POE‐g‐AMPC. Both rheological and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy results indicated a new copolymer was formed in the reactive blends. Compared to uncompatibilized PBT/POE blends, smaller dispersed particle sizes with narrower distribution were found in the compatibilized PBT/POE‐g‐AMPC blends. There was a marked increase in impact strength by about 10‐fold over that of PBT/POE blends with the same rubber content and almost 30‐fold higher than that of pure PBT when the POE‐g‐AMPC content was 25 wt%. CONCLUSION: The blocked isocyanate‐functionalized POE is an effective toughener for semicrystalline polymers. Super‐toughened PBT blends can be obtained when the POE‐g‐AMPC content is equal to or more than 15 wt%. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Melting,crystallization behaviors,and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET/PTT/PBT ternary blends

The melting, crystallization behaviors, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the ternary blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(buthylene terephthalate) (PBT) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). PBT content in all ternary blends was settled invariably to be one‐third, which improved the melt‐crystallization temperature of the ternary blends. All of the blend compositions in amorphous state were miscible as evidenced by a single, composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) observed in DSC curves. DSC melting thermograms of different blends showed different multiple melting and crystallization peaks because of their various polymer contents. During melt‐crystallization process, three components in blends crystallized simultaneously to form mixed crystals or separated crystals depending upon their content ratio. The Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the Ozawa theory were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of two selected ternary blends. The results spoke that the Avrami equation was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization process of the ternary blends. The values of the t_1/2 and the parameters Z_c showed that the crystallization rate of the ternary blends with more poly(ethylene terephthalate) content was faster than that with the lesser one at a given cooling rate. The crystal morphology of the five ternary blends investigated by polarized optical microscopy (POM) showed different size and distortional Maltese crosses or light spots when the PTT or poly(ethylene terephthalate) component varied, suggesting that the more the PTT content, the larger crystallites formed in ternary blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and amorphous poly(ethylene terephthalate) (aPET) have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that PTT/aPET blends were miscible in the melt. Thus, the single glass transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range and the retardation of crystallization kinetics of PTT in blends suggested that PTT and aPET were totally miscible. The nucleation density of PTT spherulites, the spherulitic growth, and overall crystallization rates were depressed upon blending with aPET. The depression in nucleation density of PTT spherulites could be attributed to the equilibrium melting point depression, while the depression in the spherulitic growth and overall crystallization rates could be mainly attributed to the reduction of PTT chain mobility and dilution of PTT upon mixing with aPET. The underlying nucleation mechanism and growth geometry of PTT crystals were not affected by blending, from the results of Avrami analysis. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:2005–2011, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Supramolecular semicrystalline polyolefin elastomer blends with triple‐shape memory effects

Supramolecular polyolefin elastomer blends possessing triple‐shape memory effects were prepared by melt blending of two semicrystalline maleated elastomers (maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (mEPDM) and maleated polyethylene‐octene elastomer (mPOE)) in the presence of a small amount of 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole (ATA). The amino group of ATA reacted with the maleic anhydride groups of both elastomers during melt blending to form supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded networks. Dynamic mechanical analysis of the blends showed drops in the storage modulus at two different transition temperatures (T_trans) belonging to the crystalline melting temperatures of each phase as well as a plateau above these two T_trans. This is an essential property for triple‐shape memory behavior. Dual‐shape memory properties of the blends were determined using one‐step programming under three different temperature ranges. When an individual crystalline phase is used for the fixing process, the switching temperature (T_sw) relates to the melting temperature of a particular phase during the recovery process. However, if both crystalline phases are used simultaneously for the fixing process, then the T_sw relates to the higher melting temperature. Cyclic two‐step programming revealed that two different shapes can be fixed, one by EPDM crystallization and the other by POE crystallization, and both programmed shapes can be recovered upon heating above a specific T_sw. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and their copolymers poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBET) containing 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40 molar ratios of 1,4‐butanediol/ethylene glycol were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at crystallization temperatures (T_c) which were 35–90 °C below equilibrium melting temperature . Although these copolymers contain both monomers in high proportion, DSC data revealed for copolymer crystallization behaviour. The reason for such copolymers being able to crystallize could be due to the similar chemical structures of 1,4‐butanediol and ethylene glycol. DSC results for isothermal crystallization revealed that random copolymers had a lower degree of crystallinity and lower crystallite growth rate than those of homopolymers. DSC heating scans, after completion of isothermal crystallization, showed triple melting endotherms for all these polyesters, similar to those of other polymers as reported in the literature. The crystallization isotherms followed the Avrami equation with an exponent n of 2–2.5 for PET and 2.5–3.0 for PBT and PBETs. Analyses of the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT and PET had higher growth rate constant G_o, and nucleation constant K_g than those of PBET copolymers. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of size and shape of dispersed poly(butylene terephthalate) on isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(lactic acid) blends

The isothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of the poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blends containing three different sizes of both spherical and fibrous poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) domains have been comparatively investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). The dynamic DSC measurement reveals that PBT domains significantly increase the degree of crystallinity of the PLA. Furthermore, the Avrami model is employed to evaluate the crystallization kinetics under isothermal conditions and it is found that PBT acts as nucleating agent, leading to a high overall crystallization rate constant k and shortened crystallization half time t_1/2. Furthermore, the crystallization rate of PLA is promoted with the incorporation of PBT with a large specific surface area. The average Avrami index n of all samples lies within the range of 3.3 ? 4.0, suggesting that morphologies of PBT do not affect the nucleation mechanism; however, the depression of equilibrium melting temperature in the blends ascribes the reductions of perfectness and size of the PLA crystallites. Besides, the nucleation of PLA crystallites around PBT fibers is probably faster than those around PBT spheres because the PBT chains oriented at the fiber surface as a result of flow‐induced crystallization during melt stretching may serve as the primary nuclei for PLA chains to drastically crystallize at the fiber surface. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:258–268, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization in blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) were melt-mixed in a Brabender cam mixer at different mixing speeds. The glass transition (T_g) and the crystallization behavior of the blends from glassy state were studied using DSC. It was found that although the blends had the same composition and exhibited the similar T_g, their properties of crystallization could be different; some exhibited a single crystallization peak and some exhibited multiple crystallization peaks depending upon experimental conditions. Results indicated that the behavior of crystallization from glassy state were influenced by entanglement and transesterification of chains. The crystallization time values were obtained over a wide range of crystallization temperature. From curve fitting, the crystallization time values and the temperature, at which the crystallization rate reaches the maximum, were found.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate)/glass fiber composites

The influences of the glass fiber (GF) content and the cooling rate for nonisothermal crystallization process of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PBT/PET) blends were investigated. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of samples were detected by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at cooling rates of 5°C/min, 10°C/min, 15°C/min, 20°C/min, 25°C/min, respectively. The Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were used to analyze the DSC data. The crystalline morphology of samples was observed with polarized light microscope. Results showed that the Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were available for the analysis of the nonisothermal crystallization process. The peaks of crystallization temperature (T_p) move to low temperature with the cooling rate increasing, crystallization half‐time (t_1/2) decrease accordingly. The crystallization rate of PBT/PET blends increase with the lower GF contents while it is baffled by higher GF contents. POLYM. COMPOS. 36:510–516, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of polypropylene random copolymer/poly(ethylene‐octene) blends

New polymer blends of polypropylene random copolymer (PP‐R) and poly(ethylene‐octene) (POE) were prepared by melt‐blending process using a corotating twin‐screw extruder. The POE content was varied up to 35%. The toughening efficiency of POE for PP‐R was evaluated by the mechanical properties of the resulted PP‐R/POE blends. The crystallization behavior and morphology of the blends were also studied. Results show that POE acts as nucleation agent to induce the crystallization of PP‐R matrix at higher crystallization temperature. Super‐toughened PP‐R/POE blends (Izod impact strength more than 500 J/m) can be readily achieved with only 10 wt % of POE. The high toughness of PP‐R/POE is attributed to cavitation and shear yielding of matrix PP‐R, as revealed by the morphology studies. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Improvement of compatibility of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene octene) blends by γ‐irradiation

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene octene) (POE) were prepared by melt blending with various amounts of trimethylolpropane triacylate (TMPTA). The mechanical properties, phase morphologies, and gel fractions at various absorbed doses of γ‐irradiation have been investigated. It was found that the toughness of blends was enhanced effectively after irradiation as well as the tensile properties. The elongation at break for all studied PET/POE blends (POE being up to 15 wt %) with 2 wt % TMPTA reached 250–400% at most absorbed doses of γ‐irradiation, approximately 50–80 times of those of untreated PET/POE blends. The impact strength of PET/POE (85/15 wt/wt) blends with 2 wt % TMPTA irradiated with as little as 30 kGy absorbed dose exceeded 17 kJ/m², being approximately 3.4 times of those of untreated blends. The improvement of the mechanical properties was supported by the morphology changes. Scanning electron microscope images of fracture surfaces showed a smaller dispersed phase and more indistinct inter‐phase boundaries in the irradiated blends. This indicates increased compatibility of PET and POE in the PET/POE blends. The changes of the morphologies and the enhancement of the mechanical properties were ascribed to the enhanced inter‐phase boundaries by the formation of complex graft structures confirmed by the results of the gelation extraction and Fourier Transform Infrared analyses. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

The effect of propylene–ethylene copolymers with different comonomer content on melting and crystallization behavior of polypropylene

The effect of propylene–ethylene copolymers (PEc) with different ethylene‐unit contents on melting and crystallization behaviors of isotactic‐polypropylene (iPP) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized light microscopy (PLM). The results show that the addition of PEc decreases significantly crystallization temperature (T_c) of iPP, but slightly affects melting temperature (T_m). With increasing the ethylene‐unit content of the propylene–ethylene copolymers, the decrease in crystallization temperature of iPP is smaller. The PLM results show that the spherulite growth rate decreases with increasing crystallization temperature for iPP and iPP/PEc blends. The higher the ethylene‐unit content of the copolymers is, the lower the spherulite growth rate (G) of iPP/PEc blends is. The influence of the PEc on nucleation rate constant (K_g) and fold surface energy (σ_e) of iPP was examined by nucleation theory of Hoffman and Lauritzen. The results show that both K_g and σ_e of iPP/PE20(80/20) and iPP/PE23(80/20) blends are higher than those of iPP, demonstrating that the overall crystallization rate of iPP/PEc blends decreased as compared to that of iPP, resulting from the decrease of the nucleation rate and the spherulite growth rate of iPP. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

High impact poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene octene) blends prepared by reactive blending

Poly(ethylene octene) grafted with glycidyl methacrylate (POE‐g‐GMA) was prepared and used to toughen poly (lactic acid) (PLA) via reactive blending. It was found that the notched Izod impact strength of PLA/POE‐g‐GMA blends improved dramatically when the content of elastomer was higher than 10 wt%. Reactive compatibilization between PLA and POE‐g‐GMA were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and “Molau test,” the results showed the end carboxyl groups of PLA reacted with the epoxide groups of POE‐g‐GMA during blending. This considerably improved the compatibilization, leading to better wetting of the dispersed phase by the PLA matrix and finer dispersed POE‐g‐GMA particles with narrow distribution. Moreover, the critical interparticle distance (L_c) of the dispersed domains for PLA/POE‐g‐GMA blends system at room temperature was also identified. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Supramolecular thermoplastic elastomer with thermally scratch repairable effect from 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole crosslinked maleated polyethylene‐octene elastomer/nylon 12 blends

In this study, nylon 12 (5–25 wt %) was melt blended with a supramolecular thermally repairable thermoplastic elastomer (ATA‐POE), which was generated by crosslinking of maleated polyethylene‐octene elastomer (mPOE) with 3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole (ATA), in an internal mixer. The effect of nylon 12 content on the phase morphology, thermomechanical properties, and thermally triggered scratch repairing effects of the ATA‐POE/nylon 12 blends was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy results showed that nylon 12 formed a dispersed phase with submicron scale in a continuous ATA‐POE phase. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry analysis revealed that there are extensive hydrogen bonding interactions between the ATA‐POE and nylon 12 in the blends, which was manifested by a decrease in the melting temperature of each polymer component. Tensile and dynamic mechanical test showed that tensile modulus increased with increasing nylon 12 contents in the blend with maintaining fairly high elastic recoverability. Furthermore, the blends containing up to 20 wt % of nylon 12 showed good scratch repairing effects when they are heated above melting temperature of the ATA‐POE phase in the blend. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41511.     

Kinetics of isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/ liquid crystalline polymer blends

The melting behavior and isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer (LCP), Vectra A950 (VA) blends were studied by using differential scanning calorimetry. Isothermal crystallization experiments were performed at crystallization temperatures (T_c), of 190, 195, 200 and 205°C from the melt (300°C) and analyzed based on the Avrami equation. The values of the Avrami exponent indicate that the PBT crystallization process in PBT/VA blends is governed by three‐dimensional morphology growth preceded by heterogeneous nucleation. The overall crystallization rate of PBT in the melt blends is enhanced by the presence of VA. However, the degree of PBT crystallinily remains almost the same. The analysis of the melting behavior of these blends indicates that the stability and the reorganization process of PBT crystals in blends are dependent on the blend compositions and the thermal history. The fold surface interfacial energy of PBT in blends is more modified than in pure PBT. Analysis of the crystallization data shows that crystallization occurs in Regime II across the temperature range 190°C‐205°C. A kinetic treatment based on the combination of Avrami and Ozawa equations, known as Liu's approach, describes the non‐isothermal crystallization. It is observed that at a given cooling rate the VA blending increases the overall crystallization rate of PBT.     

The effect of poly(ethylene glycol) mixed with poly(l‐lactic acid) on the crystallization characteristics and properties of their blends

The non‐isothermal and isothermal crystallizations of extruded poly(l ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) blends with 10, 20 and 30 wt% poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry. The formation of α‐form crystals in the blend films was verified using X‐ray diffraction and an increase in crystallinity indexes using Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy. Crystallization and melting temperatures and crystallinity of PLLA increased with decreasing cooling rate (CR) and showed higher values for the blends. Although PLLA crystallized during both cooling and heating, after incorporation of PEG and with CR = 2 °C min^?1 its crystallization was completed during cooling. Increasingly distinct with CR, a small peak appeared on the lower temperature flank of the PLLA melting curve in the blends. A three‐dimensional nucleation process with increasing contribution from nuclei growth at higher CR was verified from Avrami analysis, whereas Kissinger's method showed that the diluent effect of 10 and 20 wt% PEG in PLLA decreased the effective energy barrier. During isothermal crystallization, crystallization half‐time increased with temperature (T_ic) for the blends, decreased with PEG content and was lower than that of pure PLLA. In addition, the Avrami rate constants were significantly higher than those of pure PLLA, at the lower T_ic. Different crystal morphologies in the PLLA phase were formed, melting in a broader and slightly higher T_m range than pure PLLA. The crystallization activation energy of PLLA decreased by 56% after the addition of 10 wt% PEG, increasing though with PEG content. Finally, PEG/PLLA blends presented improved flexibility and hydrophilicity. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) blends and copolymers containing minor amounts of poly(butylene succinate)

Poly(ethylene succinate) (PES), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), and PES‐rich copolyesters were synthesized using an effective catalyst, titanium tetraisopropoxide. PES was blended with minor amounts of PBS for the comparison. The compositions of the copolyesters and the blends were determined from NMR spectra. Their thermal properties were studied using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), a temperature modulated DSC (TMDSC), and a thermogravimetric analyzer. No significant difference exists among the thermal stabilities of these polyesters and blends. For the blends, the reversible curves of TMDSC showed a distinct glass‐rubber transition temperature (T_g), however, the variation of the T_g values with the blend compositions was small. Isothermal crystallization kinetics and the melting behavior after crystallization were examined using DSC. Wide‐angle X‐ray diffractograms (WAXD) were obtained for the isothermally crystallized specimens. The results of DSC and WAXD indicate that the blends have a higher degree of crystallinity and a higher melting temperature than those of the corresponding copolymers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Phase behavior of blends containing amorphous poly(resorcinol phthalate‐block‐carbonate) and semicrystalline polyesters

The phase behavior of poly(resorcinol phthalate‐block‐carbonate) (RPC) with engineering polyesters was investigated by using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis. RPC was found to form miscible blends with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), and poly(cyclohexylmethylene terephthalate) (PCT), but was partially miscible with poly(1,4‐cyclohexanedimethylene‐1,4‐cyclohexanedicarboxylate) (PCCD) in the melt state and below the melting temperature (T_m). The degree of melting‐point depression indicates that the RPC is most miscible with PCT followed by PET and then PBT. Furthermore, with the help of empirical DSC data and the Nishi–Wang equation, the interaction parameters between RPC and PET, PBT, and PCT were quantified to be ?0.36, ?0.33, and ?0.54, respectively. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008