大型客机初创期“主供”发展模式下的关系契约协调

研究我国大型客机研制初创期情景下的“主供”供应链协调.在供应商及主制造商交叉竞争的条件下,主制造商从寻求强势供应商建立合作关系入手,设计基于专有投资的关系契约,以线性分成合作关系带来的收益激励强势供应商与主制造商建立合作关系;分析不同契约状态时交叉竞争供应链的均衡决策,对关系契约的占优性、关系契约的演化等方面进行分析.研究得出,当关系契约能够自执行且满足强势供应商及弱主制造商的盈利预期时,供应商接受契约,双方合作关系达成;当强势供应商不接受关系契约,即无契约协调时,双方的最优交易量及供应价格完全由市场竞争决定.与完全竞争条件下相比,关系契约协调时供应商成本结构对其与不同主制造商最优交易量的影响呈相反趋势,且关系契约具有占优性,能够协调弱主制造商及相对强势供应商建立合作关系,并提升二者的盈利能力和竞争能力.     

多对一供应链零售商驱动型收入共享契约下的生产决策

针对多对一供应链结构中零售商具有较强议价能力的特点,建立了零售商为主方、制造商为从方的Ｓｔａｃｋｅｌｂｅｒｇ主从对策模型;给出在零售商提供契约条款的对称博弈中,制造商生产产品策略存在唯一最优解的证明;分析了零售商契约参数变量的决策问题;讨论了收入共享契约下分散供应链同集中供应链决策的关系．通过仿真实验,分析验证了契约参数及产品的可替代性对供应链绩效的影响．     

多对一供应链零售商驱动型收入共享契约下的生产决策

针对多对一供应链结构中零售商具有较强议价能力的特点,建立了零售商为主方、制造商为从方的Ｓｔａｃｋｅｌｂｅｒｇ主从对策模型;给出在零售商提供契约条款的对称博弈中,制造商生产产品策略存在唯一最优解的证明;分析了零售商契约参数变量的决策问题;讨论了收入共享契约下分散供应链同集中供应链决策的关系．通过仿真实验,分析验证了契约参数及产品的可替代性对供应链绩效的影响．

     

考虑质量控制和损失规避的供应链协调研究

研究质量控制和各成员均损失规避背景下的供应链协调问题,应用损失规避效应函数刻画制造商和零售商的损失规避行为,通过分析比较分散决策和集中决策两种模式下的最优策略,引入批发价格-质量成本分担契约构建供应链协调模型,研究表明,该契约能够使质量控制与损失规避背景下的供应链实现协调.通过算例对损失规避程度、产品合格率和销售价格等参数进行灵敏度分析,揭示了损失规避和质量控制等因素与最优产品质量水平、最优订货量以及供应链效用之间的关系.     

柔性契约协调机制下的供应链采购优化与决策

为提高供应链及链上各实体的收益,合理分配采购量,针对多个供应商和单一制造商组成的供应链系统构建了基于柔性契约协调机制的多对一供应链协调优化模型,分析了柔性契约协调机制对分散式供应链系统绩效的影响。针对多对一供应链结构中核心制造商有强议价能力的特点,建立了以制造商为主方、供应商为从方的Stackelberg主从对策模型,分别讨论了集中控制和分散控制下的最优决策。在期权契约下核心制造商通过设计合理的契约参数,可以激励上游供应商的决策行为,从而使得分散供应链系统的绩效能够得到提高。仿真实验证明了该柔性契约协调机制的有效性。实验结果表明,在一定的契约参数条件下,制造商不能随意设置其初始采购量,否则可能导致协调失效。     

相对公平关切下考虑产品设计的再制造合作模式与供应链协调

将相对公平关切和产品可再制造性设计同时纳入由一个制造商和一个再制造商构成的供应链中,构建外包和授权两种再制造合作模式下供应链的决策模型,研究制造商的再制造合作模式选择问题,分析最优再制造合作模式下再制造商相对公平关切和产品可再制造性设计对供应链生产定价决策及利润的影响,并设计相应的协调策略.研究结果表明:外包再制造是制造商的最优再制造合作模式;在外包再制造供应链中,再制造商的相对公平关切虽会降低制造商利润,但能提高供应链系统利润;产品可再制造性设计对再制造商总是有利的;外包价格契约能够实现外包再制造供应链的协调.     

需求和回收努力扰动下闭环供应链定价与协调

针对干扰事件下由单个制造商和单个零售商组成的闭环供应链系统, 建立制造商为主导的Stackelberg博弈模型, 首先分析了数量折扣契约对闭环供应链的协调作用, 然后分析了数量折扣契约应对干扰事件的协调作用。结果表明, 当干扰事件引起市场规模、再制造成本、回收努力同时扰动时, 原契约具有一定鲁棒性; 当扰动超出一定范围时, 原有的协调被打破; 为此, 给出改进的数量折扣契约具有抗干扰事件性, 并讨论闭环供应链成员的最优利润分配策略, 最后通过数值实验来验证结论的有效性。     

LR-型模糊需求下供应链的质量控制与成本分担

研究LR-型模糊需求下两级供应链中可变比例成本分担和质量控制的契约设计问题. 在召回成本无分担的分散模式下, 供应链成员努力投资不足, 集中式供应链努力选择互补, 互补程度关于单位召回成本和总缺陷率递增. 引入可变比例成本分担契约, 该契约能发挥制造商与供应商的努力选择互补效应, 且双方关于努力选择的博弈存 在Nash 均衡. 当缺陷分析成本为零时, 在契约Φ 下供应链成员激励相容, 供应链的整体利润等于集中式最优利润. 确定可变分担比例解析解、缺陷率阈值. 验证结果表明, 契约Φ 的成本无效指数和质量无效指数均低于固定比例成本分担合同, 契约Φ 比固定比例成本分担合同更合理、有效.

     

需求依赖减排水平和价格的供应链决策与协调机制

针对由一个低碳产品制造商与一个零售商组成的供应链, 考虑需求同时受减排水平和销售价格的影响, 分别研究寄售契约、收益共享契约以及收益共享与减排成本共担3 种契约下供应链企业的优化决策, 并进一步探讨当需求的确定部分为和式、随机部分服从均匀分布时的供应链系统的最优决策. 从理论上证明了制造商与零售商之间的合作利于促进减排水平的提升, 也利于供应链系统期望总利润的增加. 最后, 探讨了不同参数对协调供应链绩效的影响.

     

随机需求下供应链企业订购多Agent协商模型

针对随机需求下供应链产销订购冲突问题,考虑一个制造商和两个零售商组成的两级供应链,构建主从博弈下的多Agent协商模型。制造商作为博弈主方制定批发价,零售商作为从方选择最优订货量和零售价,制造商Agent和零售商Agent自动协商,运用模拟退火算法寻求模型的最优解。通过算例发现合理的让步策略和收益共享契约能够提高供应链系统利润,实现产销双方的互利共赢。验证模拟退火算法求解该模型比遗传算法能够得到更优解。     

考虑权力结构与股权合作的低碳闭环供应链生产决策及协调

低碳时代传统制造业的成本构成以及盈利模式已被彻底颠覆,考虑再制造及碳减排的闭环供应链生产决策及协调优化值得关注.在3种渠道权力结构下,构建零售商持股制造商减排投资的闭环供应链决策模型,分析权力结构与股权合作对闭环供应链生产决策及企业利润的影响,探讨股权合作与两部定价契约的协调效果.研究发现,不同权力结构的闭环供应链需选择合适的持股比例,零售商主导下更高的持股比例产生更高的回收率、碳减排量及市场需求,而Nash博弈下则相反.有主导者的权力结构中,零售商持股比例的增加能够提高主导企业的利润;无主导者的权力结构中,企业利润的增减受持股比例与消费者低碳偏好的共同影响.无论何种权力结构,股权合作仅能实现闭环供应链的部分协调,通过两部定价契约可实现完美协调.     

考虑风险规避与质量和服务水平的VMI供应链期权协调策略

针对一个考虑风险规避供应商与质量和服务水平的二级VMI供应链,应用条件风险价值(CVaR)准则刻画供应商的风险规避行为,提出由期权和成本分担构成的组合契约,构建以零售商为主导的Stackelberg博弈模型,探讨供应链协调策略以及风险规避对供应链协调和利润分配的影响.研究表明,供应商的最优生产量随着其风险规避程度的增加而减小,但最优质量和服务水平与风险规避程度无关;当且仅当供应商风险规避程度较低时供应链才能实现协调,且供应商风险规避程度是影响供应链契约设计和利润分配的关键因素.     

零售商销售代理的协同激励对供应链绩效影响

以制造商、零售商和销售代理组成的三级供应链系统为背景,分析销售代理的协同激励对供应链绩效的影响.应用委托代理理论,针对协同激励和传统激励两种情形设计相应的契约,并作对比分析.研究结果表明,协同激励时,制造商收益增加,零售商收益减少,整个供应链系统收益增加.同时可以发现,制造商给予零售商的分成系数和零售商给予销售代理的佣金均减少,底薪的变化则由销售代理的风险规避系数而定.     

Contract efficiency for a decentralized supply chain in the presence of quality improvement

In this paper, we study a joint pricing and product quality decision problem in a decentralized supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. Although the manufacturer decides the product quality with an associated cost, the retailer decides the retail price. We aim to study and compare different contract formats for this decentralized supply chain. There is a trade‐off in the choice of contracts: simpler format contract (with a few parameters) is less complicated, but the contract efficiency is low. We start with the simplest one‐parameter contract: a wholesale price contract that serves as the benchmark. We then study how contract efficiency can be improved by adding one more parameter. Specifically, we consider three two‐parameter contracts that are commonly used in reality: two‐part tariff contract, revenue‐sharing contract, and effort cost sharing contract. We find that the contract efficiency is improved under all the three contracts, but in different ways: the improvement in contract efficiency under each of them dominates the other two when manufacturer's quality improvement effectiveness is relatively low, moderate, and high, respectively. Furthermore, through numerical examples, we find that under some cases, a choice from these three two‐parameter contracts can achieve a close‐to‐perfect efficiency (>85%). Finally, we investigate whether a combination of the three two‐parameter contracts can achieve coordination. Interestingly, we find that only the combination of effort cost sharing contract and revenue‐sharing contract can achieve coordination, whereas combinations of either of them and two‐part tariff contract cannot.     

A framework for evaluation of coordination by contracts: A case of two-level supply chains

A supply chain consists of disparate but inter-dependent members who are dependent on each other to manage various resources (such as inventory, money and information). The conflicting objectives and lack of coordination between these members may often cause uncertainties in supply and demand. Coordination may help in managing inter-dependencies and reducing uncertainties. Typically, a mechanism is required to streamline the whole supply chain and motivate all the members to be a part of the entire supply chain for sharing risks and rewards through supply chain contracts.The objective of this paper is to explore the applicability and benefits of the contracts. A two-phase framework is proposed consisting of a decision support tool and a graph-theoretic model for evaluation of coordination in a two-level supply chain. In Phase I, an analytical model is proposed based on the classical newsboy problem. Various contract mechanisms have been explored through a decision support tool based on the simulation. The effectiveness of these contracts is evaluated through a graph-theoretic model in Phase II. It is expected that by designing the contracts as per the requirements of the supply chain members as well as the whole supply chain, supply chain performance may be improved.     

基于区块链应用模式的铁路旅客身份认证系统

采用“区块链技术+不对称加密+生物识别+身份认证”应用模式，依托智能手机客户端设计与开发一套铁路旅客身份认证系统.基于Ethereum开发平台，应用truffle开发框架，实现铁路旅客身份认证系统智能合约的编写与部署.系统针对传统铁路身份认证模式的不足，将旅客身份数据分布式存储，弱化中心化服务器的压力，提升旅客身份数据的安全性和鲁棒性；进行生物信息认证确保旅客对身份信息的所有权；利用非对称加密技术在保护旅客隐私、实现实名制的前提下增强数据的透明性.基于区块链应用模式的铁路旅客身份认证系统能够让用户身份实现本地存储、信息摘要链上校验，实现铁路旅客身份信息数据访问的细粒度控制，保障铁路旅客身份信息安全，提升铁路旅客的乘车体验.     

Contract analysis: A performance measures and profit evaluation within two-echelon supply chains

Coordination is regarded as key in managing dependencies between distinctive members of a supply chain through the benefits of coordination mechanisms. Such coordination mechanisms are contracts, implemented to increase total supply chain profit, reduce costs and share risk among supply chain members. However, by contract implementation the retailer is constrained in his purchase by bearing the entire risk of holding the inventory (wholesale price contract) or by limited risk allocated to the supplier (buyback, revenue sharing and quantity flexibility contracts). By implementing an advanced purchase system the risk of inventory is fairly divided between the supplier and the retailer. In order to observe inventory implications on the supply chain bottom line, this article is directed towards the evaluation of performance measures and supply chain profit behavior under buyback, revenue sharing, quantity flexibility and advanced purchase discount contracts versus no coordination and wholesale price systems.