Ultrapure dialysis fluid: Improving conventional and daily dialysis

Dialysis fluid of standard quality contains a certain amount of bacteria and endotoxin. This has been considered acceptable because the dialysis membrane was believed to be a protective barrier to blood. However, improved methods for detection of cellular activation have demonstrated that bacterial products in the dialysate may stimulate monocytes to produce cytokines with most dialysis membranes. Ultrapure dialysis fluid is practically free from bacteria and endotoxin (< 0.1 CFU/mL and < 0.03 EU/mL) and can be prepared from standard‐quality dialysis fluid using a single step of controlled ultrafiltration. The European guidelines for hemodialysis (HD) set the use of ultrapure dialysis fluid as the goal for all dialysis modalities. Several clinical studies report improved inflammatory status in HD patients when ultrapure dialysis fluid is used, compared with standard‐quality dialysate. The benefits include less frequent occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome, lower C‐reactive protein values, reduced need for erythropoietin, better nutritional status, and even better preservation of residual renal function. For patients on daily dialysis, dialysate quality is especially important because such patients are often treated at home where quality control of incoming water may be less rigorous, and increased treatment frequency leads to exposure to larger volumes of dialysis fluid than with conventional dialysis. The use of ultrapure dialysis fluid together with low‐complement‐activating membranes maximizes the biocompatibility of a dialysis treatment, a goal of treatment, although there is a lack of evidence to date supporting a beneficial effect on mortality. From a physiologic point of view the reduced inflammatory stimulus that can be achieved with ultrapure dialysis fluid is highly desirable. In addition, achieving ultrapure dialysis fluid is realistic, because today it can be practically and economically prepared using modern equipment and applying appropriate microbiologic surveillance techniques.     

Worldwide water standards for hemodialysis

Contaminants commonly found in tap water are toxic to hemodialysis patients. To prevent patient injury from these contaminants, standards for the quality of water used to prepare dialysate have been developed. These standards are in general agreement concerning maximum allowable levels of inorganic chemical contaminants known to have adverse consequences for dialysis patients. There is less agreement about inorganic chemical contaminants that may be toxic, and most standards omit any requirements for organic chemical contaminants. There are considerable differences between standards regarding the maximum allowable levels of microbiological contaminants, as well as the methods to be used for measuring them. Harmonization of existing standards may improve patient protection by promoting demonstrated best practices. Harmonization will require innovation and compromise to produce a standard that is widely applicable, provides patients with the necessary safeguards, and whose requirements can be routinely achieved within the constraints imposed by local reimbursement practices.     

Quality of water in hemodialysis centers in Baghdad,Iraq

Dialysis water quality is one of the important parameters all over the world because of its direct influence on the health of kidney patients. In Iraq, there are more than 20 dialysis centers; most of them contain identical units for the production of dialysis water. In this work, the quality of water used for dialysis in six dialysis centers located within Baghdad hospitals was evaluated. Samples of product water from each of the six dialysis centers were examined for total heterotrophic bacteria, endotoxin, and chemical contaminants. Endotoxin was measured on‐site using a portable instrument. Bacteriological and chemical examinations were done in the laboratory after collecting samples from each dialysis center. The results showed a fluctuation in the produced water quality that makes the produced water unaccepted when compared with international standards. Bacterial counts for 60% of the analyzed samples were above the action level (50 colony‐forming units[CFU]/mL), while five out of the six dialysis centers showed values higher than the maximum value (100 CFU/mL). Chemical analysis showed that the dialysis water quality suffers from elevated aluminum concentration for all dialysis centers. All hemodialysis centers need thorough monitoring and preventive maintenance to ensure good water quality. In addition, it is important to revise the design of the water treatment units according to the feed and product water quality.     

In‐center hemodialysis attendance: Patient perceptions of risks,barriers, and recommendations

Missed hemodialysis treatments lead to increased morbidity and mortality in the end‐stage renal disease population. Little is known about why patients have difficulty attending their scheduled in‐center dialysis treatments. Semistructured interviews with 15 adherent and 15 nonadherent hemodialysis patients were conducted to determine patients' attitudes about dialysis, health beliefs and risk perception regarding missed treatments, barriers and facilitators to hemodialysis attendance, and recommendations to improve the system to facilitate dialysis attendance. Average time on dialysis was 2.5 years for the nonadherent group and 7.3 years in the adherent group. In both groups, patients felt that dialysis is life‐saving and a necessity. A substantial number of patients in both groups understood that missing hemodialysis treatments is dangerous and several patients could clearly communicate the risk of skipping. The most common barriers to hemodialysis were inadequate or unreliable transportation (mentioned in both groups) and a lack of motivation to get to dialysis or that dialysis is not a priority (typically mentioned by the nonadherent group). Facilitators to hemodialysis attendance included explanations from the health care team regarding the risk of skipping and relationships with other dialysis patients. Patient recommendations to improve dialysis attendance included continued education about the risk of poor attendance and more accessible transportation. Patients did not feel that home dialysis would improve adherence. Hemodialysis patients must adhere to a complex and burdensome regimen. Through the elucidation of barriers and facilitators to hemodialysis attendance and through specific patient recommendations, at least three interventions may be further investigated to improve hemodialysis attendance: Improvement of the transportation system, education and supportive encouragement from the health care team, and peer support mentorship.     

Endotoxins and inflammation in hemodialysis patients

Long‐term endotoxin challenge may promote frequent complications in dialysis patients, namely malnutrition, chronic inflammation, and atherosclerosis, which are recognized as the so‐called MIA syndrome. Circulating soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (sVCAM‐1) levels may be used to determine the stage of atherosclerosis. This study aimed to assess endotoxin level in hemodialysis (HD) patients and its role in inducing inflammation. The study was conducted on 50 HD patients, chosen from four dialysis centers in Alexandria. Serum blood samples were collected for the determination of albumin and C‐reactive protein (CRP), and whole blood samples were used for the measurement of hemoglobin level. A heparinized whole blood sample was taken postdialysis for endotoxin assay by limulus amebocyte lysate test, and in addition to sVCAM‐1 was estimated using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The mean endotoxin level was 76.30 pg/mL;80% exhibited values higher than 60 pg/mL. Half the studied patients had CRP values that exceeded the upper limit of the laboratory reference range (<6.0 mg/L). A statistically significant correlation was found between endotoxin and CRP levels (r = 0.47, P = 0.001). The mean pre‐HD level of VCAM was 1851.00 ng/mL, while the mean post‐HD level was 2829.00 ng/mL with statistically significant correlation (r = 0.354, P = 0.012) and it also correlated significantly with endotoxin as well as CRP levels. Endotoxemia may play an important role in the aggravation of endothelial dysfunction in HD patients as indicated by the post‐HD rise in sVCAM‐1.     

Hemodialysis for infants,children, and adolescents

Children with chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring dialysis can be treated by peritoneal or hemodialysis. In the United Kingdom nearly twice as many children receive peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis. Technical aspects of pediatric hemodialysis are challenging and include the relative size of extracorporeal circuit and child's blood volume, assessment of adequacy,technical and complications of vascular access. Alternatives to standard hospital‐based hemodialysis are also increasingly available. Optimizing nutritional status with the support of specialist pediatric dietitians is key to the management of children receiving hemodialysis. The effects of chronic illness on growth and school achievement, as well as the psychological, emotional, and social development of the child should not be underestimated. This review focuses on the above elements and highlights common pediatric practice in the United Kingdom.     

D‐dimer levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients: High prevalence of positive values also in the group without predisposing diseases

We aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated D‐dimer levels in all chronic hemodialysis patients and those without additional disease, and to identify factors associated with increased D‐dimer. In 167 chronic hemodialysis patients from our center, D‐dimer was measured before dialysis. The effects of age, C‐reactive protein (CRP), recent acute illness, vascular access, anticoagulation type, dialysis vintage, and chronic diseases, considered to predispose for increased D‐dimer levels, were analyzed. The median D‐dimer in the whole group was 966 (inter‐quartile range [IQR] 524–1947) μg/L and was positive (>500 μg/L) in 75% of cases. D‐dimer was positive in 91% of patients with acute illness, 76% of those with predisposing chronic diseases, but was still positive in 52% of patients without additional disease (i.e., acute illness or predisposing chronic diseases) – median D‐dimer was 538.5 (IQR 359–966) μg/L. D‐dimer was correlated to patients' age, but not dialysis vintage. In univariate analysis, the D‐dimer levels were significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, recent acute illness, increased CRP, dialyzed over a catheter, and on citrate anticoagulation. Multivariate logistic regression showed that only age >65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.93), catheter (OR 4.86), and positive CRP (OR 4.07) were independently associated with positive D‐dimer at 500 μg/L cut‐off, while the significance of age disappeared at 2000 μg/L cut‐off. To conclude, the high prevalence of positive D‐dimer values even in hemodialysis patients without additional disease limits the use of D‐dimer for exclusion of thromboembolic diseases in hemodialysis patients.     

Patient experiences and preferences on short daily and nocturnal home hemodialysis

Quotidian/intensive hemodialysis (short daily and nocturnal) has variable effects on health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by standard HRQOL tools. We sought to understand the perceived benefits and limitations of quotidian dialysis by interviewing patients who had switched from conventional to home quotidian dialysis. We used a qualitative, phenomenological approach to explore the perceived benefits of quotidian dialysis from 10 patients using either short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis at a tertiary health care center in London, Canada. The patients varied in gender, age, employment status, home support, physical capacity, primary cause of kidney disease, previous forms of renal replacement therapy, and level of education. Four major themes emerged: (1) improvement in physical and mental well‐being including better blood pressure and concentration, (2) increased control over patient's own life including time availability, choosing when to dialyze, and dialyzing at home, (3) decreased perception of being sick including returning to regular employment and avoiding sicker patients who must have in‐center dialysis, and (4) identification of the competencies and supports required for quotidian dialysis including ability to provide self‐care, supportive family, and medical support. Our findings suggest when patients' willingness and physical ability to use quotidian dialysis are coupled with education and support systems to assist patients' and families' self‐directed care, patients qualitatively perceive benefits of both increased physical and mental health, both measures of health‐related quality of life.     

The Case for Every‐Other‐Day Dialysis

Until daily dialysis becomes widely available, we believe that hemodialysis patients would benefit enormously from every‐other‐day dialysis (EODD), which may be implemented both by home patients and in centers. Benefits of EODD over the routine, three‐times‐weekly schedule would include decreased mortality after the weekend interval without dialysis; increased weekly dose of dialysis, resulting in better rehabilitation; and improved blood pressure control.     

Clinical benefits of ultrapure dialysis fluid for hemodialysis

Ultrapure dialysis fluid contains less than 0.1 CFU/mL and 0.03 EU/mL and can be prepared by ultrafiltration of standard‐quality dialysis fluid. Today, the use of ultrapure dialysis fluid is widely recommended based on our awareness of potential transfer of bacterial products across dialysis membranes. Early observations associated improved fluid quality with reduced incidence of the carpal tunnel syndrome, but provided no proof of mechanism. Recent clinical studies in hemodialysis patients have shown that the introduction of ultrapure dialysis fluid brings about significant improvements in a number of inflammation‐related parameters. Levels of C‐reactive protein and IL‐6 are reduced, anemia management is achieved using less EPO or reaching higher hemoglobin levels, nutritional indices are improved, and β₂‐microglobulin levels have been observed to decline, when ultrapure dialysis fluid is used in comparison with standard‐quality fluid. In addition, some studies have documented reduced levels of advanced glycation end products and delayed decline of residual renal function in patients using ultrapure dialysis fluid. Although further evidence is needed before we can assess the long‐term benefits associated with improved fluid quality, there should be sufficient data available today to support our efforts toward gradual improvement of the microbiological quality of dialysis fluid.     

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a nephrologist's perspective

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) is a debilitating disorder that affects patients with renal insufficiency. Recent evidence suggests that the development of NSF may be related to the administration of gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) in the setting of magnetic resonance imaging. As no treatment has consistently been effective in the management of NSF, strategies to prevent the development of this condition appear to be the best therapy. Identification of patients at greatest risk for developing NSF after exposure to GBCM is crucial. Risk factors include advanced chronic kidney disease (stages 4 and 5) and acute or chronic inflammatory events. The United States Food and Drug Administration has updated its public health advisory to include patients with moderate renal insufficiency (chronic kidney disease stage 3) as being at risk for developing NSF. However, these data require further verification and the vast majority of affected patients are already on renal replacement therapy. Another strategy in prevention may include consultation with a radiologist for imaging alternatives. If GBCM must be administered, immediate hemodialysis may be protective in patients already on hemodialysis; however, given the lack of data to support this, we do not recommend routine dialysis for patients not yet on dialysis or who are currently being treated with peritoneal dialysis. Decisions such as this should be made on a case by case basis after evaluating additional risk factors.     

Effects of end‐stage renal disease and dialysis modalities on blood ammonia level

Introduction: Uremia results in a characteristic breath odor (uremic fetor) which is largely due to its high ammonia content. Earlier studies have shown a strong correlation between breath ammonia and blood urea levels and a 10‐fold reduction in breath ammonia after hemodialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease. Potential sources of breath ammonia include: (i) local ammonia production from hydrolysis of urea in the oropharyngeal and respiratory tracts by bacterial flora, and (ii) release of circulating blood ammonia by the lungs. While the effects of uremia and hemodialysis on breath ammonia are well known their effects on blood ammonia are unknown and were explored here. Methods: Blood samples were obtained from 23 hemodialysis patients (immediately before and after dialysis), 14 peritoneal dialysis patients, and 10 healthy controls. Blood levels of ammonia, creatinine, urea, and electrolytes were measured. Findings: No significant difference was found in baseline blood ammonia between hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and control groups. Hemodialysis procedure led to a significant reduction in urea concentration (P < 0.001) which was paradoxically accompanied by a modest but significant (P < 0.05) rise in blood ammonia level in 10 of the 23 patients studied. Change in blood ammonia pre‐ and post‐hemodialysis correlated with change in serum bicarbonate levels (r = 0.61, P < 0.01). On subgroup analysis of patients who had a rise in blood ammonia levels after dialysis, there was a strong correlation with drop in mean arterial pressure (r = 0.88, P < 0.01). The nadir intradialytic systolic blood pressure trended lower in the hemodialysis patients who had a rise in blood ammonia compared to the patients who manifested a fall in blood ammonia (124 ± 8 vs. 136 ± 6 mmHg respectively, P = 0.27). Discussion: Fall in blood urea following hemodialysis in ESRD patients was paradoxically accompanied by a modest rise in blood ammonia levels in 43% of the patients studied, contrasting prior reported effects of hemodialysis on breath ammonia. In this subgroup of patients, changes in blood ammonia during hemodialysis correlated with rise in blood bicarbonate and fall in mean arterial blood pressure.     

What Went Wrong with Home Hemodialysis in the United States and What Can Be Done Now?

In 1973, almost 40% of the more than 10 000 dialysis patients were treated by home hemodialysis. Today, with more than a quarter of a million dialysis patients in the United States, fewer than 2000 are on home hemodialysis. A number of factors have contributed to this change. First, many nephrologists and administrators who were developing new dialysis units had little or no practical experience with dialysis for chronic renal failure. Second, more elderly and diabetic patients were admitted to treatment. Home hemodialysis was more difficult for such patients, and often their helpers were themselves were elderly. Third, hemodialysis machines were difficult to learn and operate. Fourth, following publication of the results of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study, there developed the erroneous concept that a Kt/V equal to 1.0 was “adequate dialysis.” As bigger dialyzers became available, there was a widespread shortening of dialysis time. This decrease in time was embraced by for‐profit dialysis facilities and inadequately educated patients, and assembly‐line dialysis became generally accepted. Finally, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, with its simplicity and short training time, began to fill the need of many patients for home dialysis and independence, at least temporarily. Fortunately, the trend is now reversing. Two developments clearly have benefits for home hemodialysis. The first is an increasing interest in the use of more frequent dialysis. The second is the development of new equipment designed specifically for use by the patient, and requiring a minimum of effort on the patient's part.     

L carnitine in hemodialysis patients

Carnitine, 3-hydroxy-4-trimethylaminobutyrate, a small, water soluble molecule that is essential for mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, is significantly reduced in hemodialysis patients. Uremia-induced carnitine deficiency, which is magnified by dialysis, is associated with symptoms or clinical problems such as anemia hyporesponsive to erythropoietin, cardiovascular diseases, and muscle weakness. This review examines studies dealing with the different clinical aspects of chronic renal failure patients in which carnitine deficiency may play a role and has also examined the studies, which have evaluated the effect of carnitine deficiency treatment. The reports reviewed in this study, including those more recent from our laboratory, have provided data suggesting that chronic renal failure and particularly hemodialysis patients can benefit from carnitine treatment in particular for renal anemia, insulin sensitivity, and protein catabolism. On the other hand, the heterogeneous clinical response to carnitine therapy in dialysis patients, reported by other studies, and the lack of large-scale randomized trials are the rationale for the reluctance regarding a widespread use of carnitine supplements in dialysis patients. Well-designed randomized clinical trials are therefore required to fully address the potentially important carnitine treatment in dialysis patients.     

Management of hypophosphatemia in nocturnal hemodialysis with phosphate-containing enema: a technical study

Hypophosphatemia is observed in patients undergoing nocturnal hemodialysis. Phosphate is commonly added to the dialysate acid bath, but systematic evaluation of the safety and reliability of this strategy is lacking. The objectives of this study were 4‐fold. First, we determined whether predictable final dialysate phosphate concentrations could be achieved by adding varying amounts of Fleet^® enema. Second, we assessed the stability of calcium (Ca) and phosphate dialysate levels under simulated nocturnal hemodialysis conditions. Third, we assessed for Ca‐phosphate precipitate. Finally, we evaluated whether dialysate containing Fleet^® enema met the current sterility standards. We added serial aliquots of enema to 4.5 L of dialysate acid concentrate and proportioned the solution on Gambro and Althin/Baxter dialysis machines for up to 8 hours. We measured dialysate phosphate, Ca, pH, and bicarbonate concentrations at baseline, and after simulated dialysis at 4 and 8 hours. We evaluated for precipitation visually and by assessing optical density at 620 nm. We used inoculation of agar to detect bacteria and Pyrotell reaction for endotoxin. For every 30 mL of Fleet^® (1.38 mmol/mL of phosphate) enema added, the dialysate phosphate concentration increased by 0.2 mmol/L. There were no significant changes in dialysate phosphate, Ca, pH, and bicarbonate concentrations over 8 hours. No precipitate was observed in the dialysate by optical density measures at 620 nm for additions of up to 90 mL of enema. Bacterial and endotoxin testing met sterility standards. The addition of Fleet^® enema to dialysate increases phosphate concentration in a predictable manner, and no safety problems were observed in our in vitro studies.     

Association of increased travel distance to dialysis units with the risk of anemia in rural chronic hemodialysis elderly

Geographic remoteness has been found to influence health‐related outcomes negatively. As reported in the literature, rural dialysis patients have a higher risk of mortality with increasing travel distance to dialysis units. However, few studies have focused on the impact of travel distances on the development of dialysis complications. We utilized a prospectively collected chronic hemodialysis patient cohort from a rural regional hospital for analysis. Data on demographics, comorbidities, and serum laboratory results were obtained. Correlation analyses between travel distance to dialysis units and dialysis complications were conducted, and significantly correlated parameters were entered into multivariate logistic regression models to determine their exact associations. A total of 46 rural chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled, with an average age higher than others in the literature. Significant correlation was found between travel distance and serum hemoglobin levels (R² = −0.34, P value = 0.029). Multivariate logistic regression found that every 1 km increase in travel distance was associated with an increased risk of anemia (hemoglobin <9 g/dL) (odds ratio 1.46; P value = 0.01). Sensitivity analyses further showed that the associated risk was partially attenuated by serum albumin (odds ratio 1.83; P value = 0.07) and ferritin (odds ratio 1.39; P value = 0.08) levels. This is the first study to demonstrate the association between increased travel distance to dialysis units and the risk of anemia in chronic dialysis patients, especially elderly. Malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis syndrome could be partially responsible for the observed association. Further research is required to confirm our findings.     

Inflammation as a cause of malnutrition, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and poor outcome in hemodialysis patients

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated by hemodialysis (HD). Although traditional risk factors are common in dialysis patients, they may not alone be sufficient to account for the unacceptable high prevalence of CVD in this patient group. Recent evidence demonstrates that chronic inflammation, a nontraditional risk factor that is commonly observed in HD patients, may cause malnutrition and progressive atherosclerotic CVD by several pathogenetic mechanisms. The cause(s) of inflammation in HD patients is multifactorial and includes both dialysis‐related (such as graft and fistula infections, bioincompatibility, impure dialysate, and back‐filtration) and dialysis‐unrelated factors. Although inflammation may reflect underlying CVD, an acute‐phase reaction may also be a direct cause of vascular injury. Available data suggest that proinflammatory cytokines play a central role in the genesis of both malnutrition and CVD in ESRD. Thus, it could be speculated that suppression of the vicious cycle of malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis (MIA syndrome) would improve survival in dialysis patients. As there is not yet any recognized, or even proposed, targeted treatment for ESRD patients with chronic inflammation; it would be of considerable interest to study the long‐term effect of various anti‐inflammatory treatment strategies on nutritional and cardiovascular status as well as outcome in these patients.     

Role of bicarbonate dialysis in prevention of serious arrhythmias in high‐risk cardiac patients undergoing regular hemodialysis

Background: Cardiac arrhythmias are considered as one of the most important causes of mortality in patients on hemodialysis. Arrhythmias frequently occur in patients with chronic renal failure on regular hemodialysis with reported incidences varying from 30–48% of patients. These abnormalities can span from supraventricular to severe ventricular arrhythmia. There is an increased frequency of occurrence and clustering of arrhythmias around the dialysis time. Aim of the study: To detect the difference between acetate and bicarbonate dialysis as regard to the type and frequency of arrhythmia in those patients. Study design: This study was done on 20 male patients age 51–73, all have history of heart disease. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups using acetate in group 1 and bicarbonate in group 2. All patients were on regular hemodialysis (4 hours, thrice weekly). Careful history and clinical examination were done. Pre‐dialysis investigations included serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphorus, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and arterial blood gases. Post‐dialysis serum potassium and arterial blood gases were measured. ECG and forty‐eight hours ambulatory monitor (Holter monitor)(before, during, and after hemodialysis, till the end of the dialysis day and throughout the following day) were performed. Results: Group 1 showed significantly less post‐dialysis supraventricular arrhythmias than in dialysis day (210.9 ± 236 and 62.3 ± 14.4), respectively. Significantly less ventricular arrhythmias in post‐dialysis than in dialysis day (30.7 ± 50.4, and 106.2 ± 128.4), respectively. While in Group 2 there were insignificant differences regarding supraventricular arrhythmias (21.9 ± 28.9 and 16.6 ± 36.3) and ventricular arrhythmias (22.9 + 7.8 and 29.6 + 12.8) in dialysis day than in post‐dialysis day. There was significantly higher frequency of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in the dialysis day in acetate hemodialysis in comparison to bicarbonate hemodialysis. Conclusion: Bicarbonate hemodialysis is less arrhythmogenic in comparison to acetate hemodialysis and has better effect on the blood pH and greater degree of base repletion. Continuous ambulatory ECG recording (Holter) is a useful tool in detecting arrhythmias in dialysis patients.     

Removal of vancomycin administered during dialysis by a high‐flux dialyzer

Introduction: Hemodialysis patients frequently receive vancomycin for treatment of gram‐positive bacterial infections. This drug is most conveniently administered in outpatient dialysis units during the hemodialysis treatment. However, there is a paucity of data on the removal of vancomycin by high‐flux polyamide dialyzers. Methods: This is a prospective crossover study in which seven uninfected chronic hemodialysis patients at three dialysis units received vancomycin 1 gram intravenously over one hour immediately after the dialysis treatment (Phase 1), and vancomycin 1.5 grams during the last hour of dialysis treatment using a polyarylethersulfone, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyamide high‐flux (Polyflux 24R) dialyzer (Phase 2). There was a three‐week washout period between phases. Serial serum vancomycin concentrations were used to determine the removal of vancomycin when administered during dialysis. Findings: Dialysis removed 35 ± 15% (range 18‐56%) of the vancomycin dose when administered during the last hour of dialysis. The calculated area under the curve (AUC) of vancomycin levels for 0‐44.5 hours from the start of infusion were similar between the two phases (AUC_{Phase 1} 884 ± 124 mg‐hr/L, mean ± SD; AUC_{Phase 2} 856 ± 208 mg‐hr/L; P=0.72). Serum vancomycin concentrations immediately prior to the next dialysis treatment following vancomycin administration were also similar between the two phases (13.1 ± 2.7 mg/L in Phase 1 and 12.3 ± 3.3 mg/L in Phase 2; P=0.55). Discussion: When using a polyarylethersulfone, polyvinylpyrrolidone, and polyamide high‐flux HD membrane with a 24R Polyflux dialyzer, vancomycin can be administered during the last hour of dialysis if the dose that is prescribed for intra‐dialysis dosing is empirically increased to account for intra‐dialytic drug removal.