Effects of ABS‐g‐MAH on mechanical properties and compatibility of ABS/PC alloy

The effects of a compatibilizer, namely, an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS) grafted with maleic anhydrade (MAH) (ABS‐g‐MAH), on the mechanical properties and morphology of an ABS/polycarbonate (PC) alloy were studied The results showed that a small quantity of ABS‐g‐MAH has a very good influence on the notched Izod impact strength of the ABS/PC alloy without compromising other properties such as the tensile strength, flexural strength, and Vicat softening temperature (VST). The impact strength of the ABS/PC alloy, to a great extent, depends on the loading of ABS‐g‐MAH and the degree of grafting (DG) of MAH in the ABS‐g‐MAH. DSC analysis and SEM observation confirmed that ABS‐g‐MAH could significantly improve the compatibility of the ABS/PC alloy. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 831–836, 2001     

Influence of high density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride on compatibility and properties of poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate)/high density polyethylene (PBT/HDPE) blends and PBT/HDPE‐grafted maleic anhydride (PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH) blends were prepared by the reactive extrusion approach, and the effect of blend compositions on the morphologies and properties of PBT/HDPE blends and PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was studied in detail. The results showed that flexural strength, tensile strength, and notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE blends decreased with the addition of HDPE, and flexural strength and tensile strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends decreased, while the notched impact strength of PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH increased with the addition of HDPE‐g‐MAH. Compared with PBT/HDPE blends, the dimension of the dispersed phase particles in PBT/HDPE‐g‐MAH blends was decreased and the interfacial adhesion was increased. On the other hand, the effects of HDPE and HDPE‐g‐MAH contents on the crystalline and the rheological properties of the blends were also investigated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 6081–6087, 2006     

Toughening effects of ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymers with different vinyl acetate content and viscosity on nylon 1010 blends

Nylon 1010 blends with ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) and maleated ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MAH) were prepared through melt blending. The vinyl acetate (VA) content and viscosity of EVA significantly affected the notched impact strength of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends. The nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH blends with high notched impact strength (over 60 kJ/m²) were obtained when the VA content in EVA ranged from 28 to 60 wt%. The effect of VA content on the notched impact strength of blends was related to the glass transition temperature for EVA with high VA content and crystallinity for EVA with low VA content. For nylon blends with EVA with the same VA content, low viscosity of EVA led to high notched impact strength. Fracture morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends showed that blends with ductile fracture behavior usually had large matrix plastic deformation, which was the main energy dissipation mechanism. A relationship between the notched impact strength and the morphology of nylon/EVA/EVA‐g‐MAH (80/15/5) blends was well correlated by the interparticle distance model. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Synergetic toughness and morphology of poly(propylene)/nylon 11/maleated ethylene‐propylene diene copolymer blends

Polypropylene (PP)/nylon 11/maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM‐g‐MAH) ternary polymer blends were prepared via melt blending in a corotating twin‐screw extruder. The effect of nylon 11 and EPDM‐g‐MAH on the phase morphology and mechanical properties was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy observation revealed that there was apparent phase separation for PP/EPDM‐g‐MAH binary blends at the level of 10 wt % maleated elastomer. For the PP/nylon 11/EPDM‐g‐MAH ternary blends, the dispersed phase morphology of the maleated elastomer was hardly affected by the addition of nylon 11, whereas the reduced dispersed phase domains of nylon 11 were observed with the increasing maleated elastomer loading. Furthermore, a core‐shell structure, in which nylon 11 as a rigid core was surrounded by a soft EPDM‐g‐MAH shell, was formed in the case of 10 wt % nylon 11 and higher EPDM‐g‐MAH concentration. In general, the results of mechanical property measurement showed that the ternary blends exhibited inferior tensile strength in comparison with the PP matrix, but superior toughness. Especially low‐temperature impact strength was obtained. The toughening mechanism was discussed with reference to the phase morphology. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Dynamic rheological and morphological study of the compatibility of thermoplastic polyurethane/ethylene–octene copolymer blends

Two grafted ethylene–octene copolymers [POEs; i.e., POE‐g‐maleic anhydried (MAH) and aminated POE (denoted by POE‐g‐NH₂) were used as compatibilizers in immiscible blends of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and POE. The effects of the compatibilizers on the dynamic rheological properties and morphologies of the TPU/POE blends were investigated. The characteristic rheological behaviors of the blends indicated that the strong interactions between the two phases were due to the compatibilization. Microstructural observation confirmed that the compatibilizers were located at the interface in the blends and formed a stable interfacial layer and smaller dispersed phase particle size. Compared with POE‐g‐MAH, POE‐g‐NH₂ exhibited a better compatibilization effect in the TPU/POE blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Compatibilizing effect of ethylene–propylene–diene grafted maleic anhydride terpolymer on the blend of polyamide 66 and thermal liquid crystalline polymer

Polyamide 66–thermal liquid crystalline polymer (PA66/TLCP) composites containing 10 wt% TLCP was compatibilized by ethylene–propylene–diene‐grafted maleic anhydride terpolymer (MAH‐g‐EPDM). The blending was performed on a twin‐screw extrusion, followed by an injection molding. The rheological, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), thermal, mechanical properties, as well as the morphology and FTIR spectra, of the blends were investigated and discussed. Rheological, DMA, and FTIR spectra results showed that MAH‐g‐EPDM is an effective compatibilizer for PA66/TLCP blends. The mechanical test indicated that the tensile strength, tensile elongation, and the bending strength of the blends were improved with the increase of the content of MAH‐g‐EPDM, which implied that the blends probably have a great frictional shear force, resulting from strong adhesion at the interface between the matrix and the dispersion phase; while the bending modulus was weakened with the increase of MAH‐g‐EPDM content, which is attributed to the development of the crystalline phase of PA66 hampered by adding MAH‐g‐EPDM. POLYM. COMPOS., 27:608–613, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of the compatibilizer on the morphology and properties of dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends

Dynamic vulcanization was successfully applied to epoxy resin reinforced polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐octene copolymer (POE) blends, and the effects of different compatibilizers on the morphology and properties of dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends were studied. The results show that dynamically cured PP/POE/epoxy blends compatibilized with maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (MAH‐g‐PP) have a three‐phase structure consisting of POE and epoxy particles dispersed in the PP continuous phase, and these blends had improved tensile strength and flexural modulus. While using maleic anhydride‐grafted POE (MAH‐g‐POE) as a compatibilizer, the structure of the core‐shell complex phase and the PP continuous phase showed that epoxy particles could be embedded in MAH‐g‐POE in the blends, and gave rise to an increase in impact strength, while retaining a certain strength and modulus. DSC analysis showed that the epoxy particles in the blends compatibilized with MAH‐g‐PP were more efficient nucleating agents for PP than they were in the blends compatibilized with MAH‐g‐POE. WAXD analysis shows that compatibilization do not disturb the crystalline structure of PP in the blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Toughening of PP/EPDM blend by compatibilization

To improve the mechanical properties of blends of polypropylene (PP) and terpolymer of ethylene–propylene–diene (EPDM), a triblock copolymer, (PP‐g‐MAH)‐co‐[PA‐6,6]‐co‐(EPDM‐g‐MAH), was synthesized by coupling reaction of maleic anhydride (MAH)‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH), EPDM‐g‐MAH, and PA‐6,6. The newly prepared block copolymer brought about a physical interlocking between the blend components, and imparted a compatibilizing effect to the blends. Introducing the block copolymer to the blends up to 5 wt % lead to formation of a β‐form crystal. The wide‐angle X‐ray diffractograms measured in the region of 2θ between 10° and 50° ascertained that incorporating the block copolymer gave a new peak at 2θ = 15.8°. The new peak was assigned to the (300) plane spacings of the β‐hexagonal crystal structure. In addition, the block copolymer notably improved the low‐temperature impact property of the PP/EPDM blends. The optimum usage level of the compatibilizer proved to be 0.5 wt %. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 1267–1274, 2000     

The effect of compatibilizers and organically modified nanoclay on the morphology and performance properties of poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene blends

In this study, poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene)/polypropylene (ABS/PP) blends with various compositions were prepared by melt intercalation in a twin‐screw extruder. Modifications of the above blends were performed by using organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT, Cloisite 30B) reinforcement as well as two types of compatibilizers, namely polypropylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH) and ABS grafted with maleic anhydride (ABS‐g‐MAH). Increasing the PP content in ABS matrix seems to increase the melt flow and thermal stability of their blends, whereas a deterioration of the tensile properties was recorded. On the other hand, the addition of ABS to PP promotes the formation of the β‐crystalline phase, which became maximum at 30 wt% ABS concentration, and increases the crystallization temperature (T_c) of PP. A tendency for increase of T_c was also recorded by incorporation of the above compatibilizers, whereas the glass transition temperature (T_g) of PP and SAN phase in ABS was reduced. Regarding the Young's modulus, the greatest improvement was observed in pure ABS/PP blends containing organically modified nanoclay. However, in reinforced pure PP, the use of compatibilizers is recommended in order to improve the elastic modulus. The addition of OMMT to noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS/PP blends significantly improves their storage modulus. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:458–468, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Biodegradation of blends of polyethylene‐octene elastomer with starches by fungi

Five fungi including Aspergillus niger, Penicilium pinophilum, Chaetoomium globsum, Gliocladium virens and Aureobasium pullulans were used to investigate the biodegradation of starch‐based elastomers: polyethylene‐octene elastomer (POE)/starch and grafted POE‐g‐MAH/starch copolymer blends. The viability of the composite spore suspensions were measured before estimating the fungal growth on the surface of specimens. The weight loss, morphology and mechanical properties of the blended specimens were measured using scanning electron microscopy and a mechanical properties tester after 28 days of culturing. The spore suspension in the experiment showed good viability. Pure POE and POE‐g‐MAH did not allow significant fungal growth. Pure POE did not lose weight or have a change in tensile strength, but pure POE‐g‐MAH lost about 0.07% of its weight with a slight reduction in tensile strength during culture period. There was heavy growth on the surface of POE/starch and POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends after 28 days of culturing. The weight loss of POE/starch and POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends increased with increasing starch content. POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends tended to lose more weight than POE/starch blends. After biodegradation, the surface of POE/starch and POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends became rough with many holes and cracks, indicating that the films were eroded by the fungi. Tensile strength of POE/starch and POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends decreased after culturing because of microbial attack. On the contrary, elongation at break of POE‐g‐MAH/starch blends increased after biodegradation. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 114:3574–3584, 2009     

Investigation of crystallization behavior in dynamically vulcanized EPDM–nylon copolymer blends

A thermoplastic vulcanizate (TPV) of a ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer (EPDM) and nylon copolymer (PA) was prepared by dynamic vulcanization. Maleic anhydride (MAH)–grafted EPDM (EPDM–g–MAH), MAH‐grafted EPR (EPR–g–MAH), and chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) were used as compatibilizers. The effect of dynamic vulcanization and compatibilizer on the crystallization behavior of PA was investigated. Differential scanning calorimeter measurement results showed no pronounced shift in the crystallization temperature for PA in EPDM–PA TPV compared to that for PA in the neat state, whereas the crystallization temperature increased after adding compatibilizer. The decrease in the crystallinity of TPVs was a result of the crystallization occurring in confined spaces between rubber particles. The equilibrium melting temperature (Tm⁰) of the PA copolymer was measured and was determined to be 157°C. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PA in the neat and TPV states also was investigated. The crystallization rate was highest in the compatibilized TPV and lowest in the neat PA, whereas it was intermediate in the uncompatibilized TPV unvulcanized blends. Compared with unvulcanized EPDM–PA blends, the dynamic vulcanization process seemed to cause an obvious increase in the crystallization rate of the PA copolymer, especially when a suitable compatibilizer was used. This occurred because the dynamic vulcanization introduced fine crosslinked rubber particles that could act as heterogeneous nucleating centers. In addition, the use of a suitable compatibilizer permitted the formation of finely dispersed vulcanized rubber particles and therefore increased the density of the nucleating centers. The complex morphology of the blends was investigated by atomic force microscopy to evaluate the effect of compatibilizer on the size of the dispersed rubber particles. Compared with the morphology of TPVs with the same dosage of EPDM–g–MAH compatibilizer, the morphology of TPVs using EPR–g–MAH as compatibilizer showed much smaller dispersed rubber particles, which may have contributed to the higher crystallization rate. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 824–829, 2003     

Mechanical,thermal, and morphological characteristics of compatibilized and dynamically vulcanized polyoxymethylene/ethylene propylene diene terpolymer blends

Dynamically vulcanized blends of polyoxymethylene (POM) and ethylene propylene diene terpolymer (EPDM) with and without compatibilizer were prepared by melt mixing in a twin screw extruder. Maleic anhydride (MAH) grafted EPDM (EPDM‐g‐MAH) has been used as a compatibilizer. Dicumyl peroxide was used for vulcanizing the elastomer phase in the blends. Mechanical, dynamical mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of the blend systems have been investigated as a function of blend composition and compatibilizer content. The impact strength of both dynamically vulcanized blends and compatibilized/dynamically vulcanized blends increases with increase in elastomer content with decrease in tensile strength. Dynamic mechanical analysis shows decrease in tanδ values as the elastomer and compatibilizer content increased. Thermograms obtained from differential scanning calorimetric studies reveal that compatibilized blends have lower T_m values compared to dynamically vulcanized blends, which confirms strong interaction between the plastic and elastomer phase. Scanning electron microscopic observations on impact fractured surface indicate reduction in particle size of elastomer phase and its high level of dispersion in the POM matrix. In the case of compatibilized blends high degree of interaction between the component polymers has been observed. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:934–942, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of EPDM‐g‐MAH on the morphology and properties of PA6/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends

The formation of core‐shell morphology within the dispersed phase was studied for composite droplet polymer‐blend systems comprising a polyamide‐6 matrix, ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM) shell and high density polyethylene (HDPE) core. In this article, the effect of EPDM with different molecular weights on the morphology and properties of the blends were studied. To improve the compatibility of the ternary blends, EPDM was modified by grafting with maleic anhydride (EPDM‐g‐MAH). It was found that core‐shell morphology with EPDM‐g‐MAH as shell and HDPE as core and separated dispersion morphology of EPDM‐g‐MAH and HDPE phase were obtained separately in PA6 matrix with different molecular weights of EPDM‐g‐MAH in the blends. DSC measurement indicated that there may be some co‐crystals in the blends due to the formation of core‐shell structure. Mechanical tests showed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MAH/HDPE ternary blends with the core‐shell morphology exhibited a remarkable rise in the elongation at break. With more perfect core‐shell composite droplets and co‐crystals, the impact strength of the ternary blends could be greatly increased to 51.38 kJ m^?2, almost 10 times higher than that of pure PA6 (5.50 kJ m^?2). POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

The dynamic mechanical analysis,impact, and morphological studies of EPDM–PVC and MMA‐g‐EPDM–PVC blends

The dynamic mechanical studies, impact resistance, and scanning electron microscopic studies of ethylene propylene diene terpolymer–poly(vinyl chloride) (EPDM–PVC) and methyl methacrylate grafted EPDM rubber (MMA‐g‐EPDM)–PVC (graft contents of 4, 13, 21, and 32%) blends were undertaken. All the regions of viscoelasticity were present in the E′ curve, while the E″ curve showed two glass transition temperatures for EPDM–PVC and MMA‐g‐EPDM–PVC blends, and the T_g increased with increasing graft content, indicating the incompatibility of these blends. The tan δ curve showed three dispersion regions for all blends arising from the α, β, and Γ transitions of the molecules. The sharp α transition peak shifted to higher temperatures with increasing concentration of the graft copolymer in the blends. EPDM showed less improvement while a sixfold increase in impact strength was noticed with the grafted EPDM. The scanning electron microscopy micrographs of EPDM–PVC showed less interaction between the phases in comparison to MMA‐g‐EPDM–PVC blends. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 1959–1968, 1999     

Reactive extrusion for the synthesis of nylon 12 and maleated low‐density polyethylene blends via the anionic ring‐opening polymerization of lauryllactam

Nylon 12 was successfully synthesized in a twin‐screw extruder via the anionic ring‐opening polymerization of lauryllactam (LL). Maleated low‐density polyethylene (LDPE–MAH) was added to improve the mechanical properties of nylon 12. The in situ blends of nylon 12 and LDPE–MAH were characterized by mechanical testing and scanning electron microscopy. With increasing LDPE–MAH content, the tensile strength and flexural strength decreased, whereas the blend had improved impact strength and achieved supertoughness when the content of LDPE–MAH was 30 wt %. In the in situ formed low‐density polyethylene‐g‐PA12 copolymer, the domain of the LDPE–MAH phase was finely dispersed in the nylon 12 matrix. The good interface between the two phases demonstrated that LDPE–MAH could be used as a macromolecular activator to induce the polymerization of LL. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

High‐frequency welding of thermoplastic LLDPE/PA 6/PE‐g‐MAH ternary blends

High frequency (HF) welding of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) melt blends with polyamide 6 (PA6) was done at 27.12 MHz using maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MAH) as compatibilizer. HF welding was not possible for the blends at room temperature, but possible at higher temperatures (50, 80°C) although the maximum relaxation frequency was lower than the operating frequency. Greater dielectric constant, dissipation factor, and welding performance were obtained when PA 6 was premixed with PE‐g‐MAH rather than the one‐shot process where all the components were mixed simultaneously. This was interpreted in terms of lowered viscosity of PA 6 phase, which encapsulates the flow effectively and provides great skin effect. Also, the peeling force of resin–resin was greater than resin–nylon mesh due to the higher melting temperature and vacancy of nylon mesh. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/K resin blends

Mechanical properties and morphological studies of compatibilized blends of polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/K resin grafted with maleic anhydride (K‐g‐MAH) and PA‐6/K resin/K‐g‐MAH were investigated as functions of K resin/K‐g‐MAH and dispersed phase K resin concentrations, and all the blends were prepared using twin screw extruder followed by injection molding. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to assess the fracture surface morphology and the dispersion of the K resin in PA‐6 continuous phase, the results showing extensive deformation in presence of K‐g‐MAH, whereas, uncompatibilized PA‐6/K resin blends show dislodging of K resin domains from the PA‐6 matrix. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) test reveals the partially miscibility of PA‐6 with K‐g‐MAH, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results further identified that the introduction of K‐g‐MAH greatly improved the miscibility between PA‐6 and K resin. The mechanical properties of PA‐6/K resin blends and K‐g‐MAH were studied through bending, tensile, and impact properties. The Izod notch impact strength of PA‐6/K‐g‐MAH blends increase with the addition of K‐g‐MAH, when the K‐g‐MAH content adds up to 20 wt %, the impact strength is as more than 6.2 times as pure PA‐6, and accompanied with small decrease in the tensile and bending strength less than 12.9% and 17.5%, respectively. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Morphological,mechanical, and rheological studies of PVC/ABS blends in the presence of maleic anhydride

A novel method of enhancing compatibility in PVC/ABS blends is the use of ABS‐grafted‐(maleic anhydride) (ABS‐g‐MAH) as a compatibilizer. In this study, maleic anhydride was grafted onto ABS (initiated by peroxide) in an internal mixer. Grafting degree was determined by a back‐titration method, and certain amounts of the resultant ABS‐g‐MAH were added to PVC/ABS blends during their melt blending in the mixer. The weight ratio of PVC to ABS was kept at 70:30. Evaluation of compatibilization was accomplished via tensile and notched Izod impact tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and rheological studies. According to the SEM micrographs, better dispersion of the rubber phase and its finer size in properly compatibilized blends were indications of better compatibility. Besides, in the presence of a proper amount [5 parts per hundred parts of PVC (php)] of ABS‐g‐MAH, PVC/ABS blends showed significantly higher impact strengths than uncompatibilized blends. This result, in turn, would be an indication of better compatibility. In the presence of 5 php of compatibilizer, the higher complex viscosity and storage modulus, as well as a lower loss modulus and loss factor in the range of frequency studied, indicated stronger interfacial adhesion as a result of interaction between maleic anhydride and the PVC‐SAN matrix. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2010. © 2010 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Reactive compatibilization of PP/PBT blends by a mixture of PP‐g‐MA and epoxy resin

In this study, dual compatibilizers composed of the commercially available maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP–MA) and a multifunctional epoxy resin were demonstrated to effectively compatibilize the immiscible and incompatible blends of PP and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). The PP–MA with a low MA content is totally miscible with PP to make the PP phase quasi‐functionalized, so that the multifunctional epoxy has the chance to react with PBT and PP–MA simultaneously to form PP–MA‐co‐epoxy‐co‐PBT copolymers at the interface. These desired copolymers are able to anchor along the interface and serve as efficient compatibilizers. The compatibilized blends, depending on the quantity of dual compatibilizers employed, exhibit higher viscosity, finer phase domain, and improved mechanical properties. Epoxy does not show compatibilization effects for the PP/PBT blends without the presence of PP–MA in the blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 79: 2272–2285, 2001