首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到8条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Hat Mauerwerk eine Zukunft? Oder dienen Wände bald nur noch als Trägermaterial für Dämmschichten? Dabei ist gerade wärmedämmendes Mauerwerk aus gutem Grund im Wohnungsbau nach wie vor die Nummer Eins — und wird es nach Einschätzung der Fachleute auch bleiben. Dieser Beitrag schildert aktuelle Entwicklungen und beleuchtet Hintergründe. Construction with a future — theral insulating brick with mineral plaster. Does brickwork has a future? Couldn’t it be that walls will soon only serve as backing material for insulation layer? However, there are good reasons that heat insulating brickwork is still the number one in domestic constructions — according to experts this will remain so. The following article will characterize current developments und backgrounds.  相似文献   

2.
Die Energieeinsparverordnung (EnEV) 2009 beinhaltet verschärfte Anforderungen an den Jahresprimärenergiebedarf und den Transmissionswärmeverlust von Gebäuden. Damit sinkt der durchschnittliche U‐Wert von Außenwänden auf 0,28 W/(m2K). Mauersteine aus haufwerksporigem Leichtbeton wurden in den letzten Jahren wärmetechnisch so verbessert, dass sich diese Anforderungen mit Mauerwerksdicken von 36,5 cm problemlos erfüllen lassen. Selbst die Kriterien für ein KfW‐Effizienzhaus 70 oder 55 lassen sich auf diese Weise mit monolithischem Mauerwerk ohne zusätzliche Dämmung noch einhalten. Monolithic masonry made of lightweight concrete blocks meets demands of energy saving regulations. The Decree for Saving Energy (Energieeinsparverordnung, EnEV — regulation for energy saving in buildings and building systems) 2009 consists stronger regulations for the yearly demand of energy and the loss of transmission heat of buildings. Therefore the average U‐Value for enclosure walls decreases to 0.28 W/(m2K). Blocks made of aggregate lightweight concrete have been improved by the industry concerning their thermal conductivity in the last years, so these demands can be fulfilled with masonry in 36,5 cm thickness. Even the criteria of a KfW Efficiency House 70 or 55 can be fulfilled in this way with monolithic masonry without an additional thermal insulation.  相似文献   

3.
The tightening of the Energy Conservation Ordinance in 2016 provides the first step toward the introduction of nearly zero energy buildings. The level of performance for residential buildings after 2020 will most likely attain an energy quality close to the primary energy consumption of the KfW Efficiency House 55 today, at least regarding performance. The following report describes the requirements methodology of the Energy Conservation Ordinance 2014, including the KfW promotion, and provides calculation examples to clarify the issues.  相似文献   

4.
5.
6.
7.
The M1 energy‐efficiency building Plus was to render practical proof that the advantages of solid construction such as carrying capacity, fire protection and sound protection could be connected to state‐of‐the‐art and future energy efficiency standards in the scope of a pilot project. With simple and thought‐through planning details and a coordinated system technology, energy plus solid houses are no longer merely visions. The M1 project mostly focuses on the claim to economic efficiency and saleability of the product, points out new possibilities for implementation to consumers, planners and executing companies. The house is to document, that the means available now are sufficient to construct a solid building that produces more energy than it consumes. In the technical term of construction physics, the building is targeted at a negative final energy and primary energy consumption. The data presented in this article from the monitoring of the last two years show that a plus energy target can be achieved by “nearly” conventionally built solid buildings. For both years, the M1 pus energy house reached an excess of final and primary energy.  相似文献   

8.
Affordable living space has become one of the main talking points in Germany next to the threat of climate change. The SMEs of the German lightweight concrete industry offer regional masonry solutions for detached, semi‐detached, and terraced houses as well as multi‐storey apartment buildings. Particularly in densely populated urban centres, the need for multi‐storey apartment buildings arises constantly. In the following the performance of monolithic lightweight concrete masonry will be described and compared with the relevant requirements for multi‐storey apartment buildings. It will be demonstrated that masonry with supposedly low compressive strength can still fulfil all requirements. Of particular significance here are the external wall‐slab junctions.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号