Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on the morphology and mechanical and thermal properties of polystyrene/polyamide 1212 blends

Polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 1212 (PA 1212) blends were compatibilized with a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA was beneficial to the dispersion of PA 1212 in the PS matrix because of the reaction between them. The variation of the fraction of SEBS‐g‐MA in the blends allowed the manipulation of the phase structure, which first formed a sheetlike structure and then formed a cocontinuous phase containing PA 1212/SEBS‐g‐MA core–shell morphologies. As a result, the mechanical properties, especially the Charpy notched impact resistance, were significantly improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data indicated that the strong interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PA 1212 in the blends retarded the crystallization of PA 1212. The heat distortion temperature of the compatibilized blends was improved in comparison with that of the unmodified blend, probably because of the apparent increase in the glass‐transition temperature with an increasing concentration of SEBS‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 1354–1360, 2005     

Effect of ethylene ionomers on the properties of crosslinked polyethylene

Most premature failure of underground crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) cables in service, a matter of great concern, is due to aging induced by water treeing. To improve the water‐tree resistance, sodium‐neutralized poly (ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid) (EAA–Na) ionomers were blended with XLPE; the EAA–Na ionomers were prepared through the neutralization of sodium hydroxide and poly(ethylene‐co‐acrylic acid). A series of XLPE/EAA–Na ionomer blends were investigated through the measurement of the water absorption ratio, water treeing, and mechanical and dielectric testing; the results strongly suggested that EAA–Na ionomers could improve the water‐tree resistance of XLPE, and the XLPE/EAA–Na blends retained excellent mechanical properties and dielectric properties. Moreover, through the characterization of XLPE/EAA–Na blends with Fourier transform infrared spectrometry, dynamic mechanical analysis, and scanning electron microscopy, it was found that the neutralization reaction could be achieved completely; the XLPE and EAA–Na ionomers were partially compatible, so the EAA–Na ionomers could be dispersed well in the matrix with the process examined in this study. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3483–3490, 2007     

Degradation of high‐impact polystyrene with processing and its recovery via the addition of styrene–butadiene rubber and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer

This work was divided into three parts. First, high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) was submitted to a series of extrusion cycles with the objective of evaluating the consequent variations in its thermal and mechanical properties. The results showed slight variations in both the thermal and mechanical properties of HIPS. Second, degraded HIPS/styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) blends and degraded HIPS/styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) blends were prepared to evaluate the influence of the elastomeric concentration on the polymer's properties. The incorporation of SEBS or SBR allowed the recovery of the initial properties shown by virgin HIPS. Finally, blends of degraded HIPS with 2 wt % SEBS or SBR were extruded through four cycles. The mechanical properties remained constant with 2% SEBS added, whereas the mixtures of HIPS with 2% SBR showed an increase in the tensile strength as the number of extrusion cycles increased. The Vicat softening temperature decreased in both cases. The use of differential scanning calorimetry permitted the observation of differences in the crosslinking reactions of different samples as a function of the number of extrusion cycles. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Preparation and performance characteristics of short‐glass‐fiber/maleated styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene/polypropylene hybrid composites

Eighty/twenty polypropylene (PP)/styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) and 80/20 PP/maleated styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) blends reinforced with 30 wt % short glass fibers (SGFs) were prepared by extrusion and subsequent injection molding. The influence of the maleic anhydride (MA) functional group grafted to SEBS on the properties of SGF/SEBS/PP hybrid composites was studied. Tensile and impact tests showed that the SEBS‐g‐MA copolymer improved the yield strength and impact toughness of the hybrid composites. Extensive plastic deformation occurred at the matrix interface layer next to the fibers of the SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP composites during impact testing. This was attributed to the MA functional group, which enhanced the adhesion between SEBS and SGF. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements indicated that SEBS promoted the crystallization of PP spherulites by acting as active nucleation sites. However, the MA functional group grafted to SEBS retarded the crystallization of PP. Finally, polarized optical microscopy observations confirmed the absence of transcrystallinity at the glass‐fiber surfaces of both SGF/SEBS/PP and SGF/SEBS‐g‐MA/PP hybrid composites. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 1303–1311, 2002     

Morphology and mechanical properties of styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer/high‐density polyethylene composites

The morphology and mechanical properties of a styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS) incorporated with high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) particles were investigated. The impact strength and tensile strength of the SEBS matrix obviously increased after the incorporation of the HDPE particles. The microstructure of the SEBS/HDPE blends was observed with scanning electron microscopy and polar optical microscopy, which illustrated that the SEBS/HDPE blends were phase‐separation systems. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis was also employed to characterize the interaction between SEBS and HDPE. The relationship between the morphology and mechanical properties of the SEBS/HDPE blends was discussed, and the toughening mechanism of rigid organic particles was employed to explain the improvement in the mechanical properties of the SEBS/HDPE blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Modification of styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene copolymer microstructure by polystyrene homopolymer and evolution of a cocontinuous blend morphology

Styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene (SEBS) copolymer was blended with the homopolymer polystyrene (hPS) in a counter‐rotating twin‐screw extruder to prepare hPS/SEBS blends. The morphology of the hPS/SEBS blends was studied by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). TEM imaging of pure SEBS revealed a microphase‐separated morphology, showing ordered regions or grains where the discrete styrene blocks formed hexagonally packed cylindrical structures within the ethylene/butylene matrix. Blending of small quantities of the homopolymer hPS showed an interesting result. The TEM images of the SEBS‐rich blends revealed that the added hPS was absorbed within the bulk of the SEBS phase resulting in a new SEBS‐rich phase, and the absorbed hPS was found to join the styrene cylinders of pure SEBS thereby modifying its original microstructure. As the hPS concentration in the blends was increased further, the ESEM and TEM images showed that the excess homopolymer hPS phase separated, forming a cocontinuous morphology with the hPS‐modified SEBS‐rich phases. Linear viscoelastic tests on the SEBS‐rich blends also revealed the existence of a synergistic effect, showing increased elastic behavior compared with that of pure SEBS. Small‐angle X‐ray scattering results showed an additional periodicity in the SEBS‐rich phase because of the modification of the SEBS microstructure by hPS. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Reactive mixing of PET and PET/PP blends with glycidyl methacrylate–modified styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐olefin) block copolymers

Styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐b‐styrene (SEBS) and styrene‐b‐(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP, SEPSEP) block copolymers with different styrene contents and different numbers of blocks in the copolymer chain were functionalized by melt radical grafting with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and employed as compatibilizers for PET‐based blends. Binary blends of PET with both functionalized (SEBS‐g‐GMA, SEP‐g‐GMA, SEPSEP‐g‐GMA) and neat (SEBS, SEP, SEPSEP) copolymers (75 : 25 w/w) and ternary blends of PET and PP (75 : 25 w/w) with various amounts (2.5–10 phr) of both modified and unmodified copolymers were prepared in an internal mixer, and their properties were evaluated by SEM, DSC, melt viscosimetry, and tensile and impact tests. The roles of the chemical structure, grafting degree, and concentration of the various copolymers on blend compatibilization was investigated. The blends with the grafted copolymers showed a neat improvement of phase dispersion and interfacial adhesion compared to the blends with nonfunctionalized copolymers. The addition of grafted copolymers resulted in a marked increase in melt viscosity, which was accounted for by the occurrence of chemical reactions between the epoxide groups of GMA and the carboxyl/hydroxyl end groups of PET during melt mixing. Blends with SEPSEP‐g‐GMA and SEBS‐g‐GMA, at concentrations of 5–10 phr, showed a higher compatibilizing effect with enhanced elongation at break and impact resistance. The effectiveness of GMA‐functionalized SEBS was then compared to that of maleic anhydride–grafted SEBS. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 2201–2211, 2005     

Influence of addition of styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene copolymer on rheological,mechanical, and tribological properties of polyamide nanocomposites

To develop new tribomaterials for mechanical sliding parts, investigations were carried out on the influence of adding styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS) on the rheological, mechanical, and tribological properties of polyamide 6 (PA6) nanocomposite, which is a commercial product of layered silicate (clay) filled polyamide 6 (PA6/Clay). Two kinds of block copolymers, unmodified SEBS (SEBS) and maleic anhydride‐grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA), were added with PA6/Clay nanocomposite. Dynamic viscoelastic properties in the molten state of these nanocomposites and their tensile, impact, and tribological properties of these nanocomposites were evaluated. Dynamic viscoelastic properties were found to increase with the addition of SEBS and were influenced, in particular, by block copolymers containing SEBS‐g‐MA. Influence of the addition of SEBS on mechanical properties of these systems differed for each mechanical property. Although tensile properties decreased with SEBS, Izod impact properties were improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Tribological properties were improved with the addition of block copolymer, and the influence of the amount of addition was higher than the type of block copolymer used. These results indicate that new tribomaterials developed have sufficient balance amongst moldability, mechanical, and tribological properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Melt rheology and properties of compatibilized recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/(styrene‐ethylene‐ethylene‐propylene‐styrene) block copolymer blends

Blends of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) and (styrene‐ethylene‐ethylene‐propylene‐styrene) block copolymer (SEEPS) compatibilized with (maleic anhydride)‐grafted‐styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene (SEBS‐g‐MAH) were prepared by melt blending. The compatibilizing effects of SEBS‐g‐MAH were investigated systematically by study of the morphology, linear viscoelastic behavior, and thermal and mechanical properties of the blends. The results show that there is good agreement between the results obtained by rheological measurement and morphological analysis. The rheological test shows that the melt elasticity and melt strength of the blends increase with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH. The Cole‐Cole plots and van Gurp‐Palmen plots confirm the compatibilizing effect of SEBS‐g‐MAH. However, the Palierne model fails to predict the linear viscoelastic properties of the blends. The morphology observation shows that all blends exhibit a droplet‐matrix morphology. In addition, the SEEPS particle size in the (R‐PET)/SEEPS blends is significantly decreased and dispersed uniformly by the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH. Differential scanning calorimeter analysis shows that the crystallization behavior of R‐PET is restricted by the incorporation of SEEPS, whereas the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH improves the crystallization behavior of R‐PET compared with that of uncompatibilized (R‐PET)/SEEPS blends. The Charpy impact strength of the blends shows the highest value at SEBS‐g‐MAH content of 10%, which is about 210% higher than that of pure R‐PET. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:342–349, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Ternary blends of high‐density polyethylene–polystyrene–poly(ethylene/butylene‐b‐styrene) copolymers: Properties and orientation behavior in plane–strain compression

Ternary blends of high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) with atactic polystyrene (PS) and styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS) were deformed by plane–strain compression in a channel die. The samples were deformed up to the true strain of 1.8 (compression ratio of 6) at 100°C. Thermal and mechanical properties of the deformed blends were studied in addition to the study of the deformation process. The basic mechanism of plastic deformation is crystallographic slip, the same as that active in deformation of plain HDPE and binary blends of HDPE and PS. This slip is supplemented by the plastic deformation of an amorphous component. In blends of high SEBS content, the role of deformation of an amorphous component by shear and flow increases markedly due to reduced overall crystallinity of these blends. In such blends an amorphous component includes a semicontinuous embedding of crystallites, and therefore, the deformation process is dominated by deformation mechanisms active in a more compliant amorphous phase. Consequently, with increasing the content of SEBS in the blend, the texture of the oriented blends changes from a single‐component (100)[001] texture to a texture with a strong fiber component in addition to a (100)[001] component. In blends with high content of SEBS, the crystalline lamellae of polyethylene do not undergo fragmentation up to the compression ratio of 6, while in blends with low and moderate content of SEBS, such lamellar fragmentation was detected. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1746–1761, 2000     

Recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene blends through physical processing

Poly(styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene) (SEBS) was used as a compatibilizer to improve the thermal and mechanical properties of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/linear low‐density polyethylene (R‐PET/LLDPE) blends. The blends compatibilized with 0–20 wt % SEBS were prepared by low‐temperature solid‐state extrusion. The effect of SEBS content was investigated using scanning electron microscope, differential scanning calorimeter, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and mechanical property testing. Morphology observation showed that the addition of 10 wt % SEBS led to the deformation of dispersed phase from spherical to fibrous structure, and microfibrils were formed at the interface between two phases in the compatibilized blends. Both differential scanning calorimeter and DMA results revealed that the blend with 20 wt % SEBS showed better compatibility between PET and LLDPE than other blends studied. The addition of 20 wt % of SEBS obviously improved the crystallizibility of PET as well as the modulus of the blends. DMA analysis also showed that the interaction between SEBS and two other components enhanced at high temperature above 130°C. The impact strength of the blend with 20 wt % SEBS increased of 93.2% with respect to the blend without SEBS, accompanied by only a 28.7% tensile strength decrease. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Compatibilization of high‐impact polystyrene/high‐density polyethylene blends by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene block copolymer

Compatibilization of polymer blends of high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) blend by styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) was elucidated. Polymer blends containing many ratios of HIPS and HDPE with various concentrations of SEBS were prepared. The Izod impact strength and elongation at break of the blends increased with increases in SEBS content. They increased markedly when the HDPE content was higher than 50 wt %. Tensile strength of blends increased when the SEBS concentration was not higher than 5 pphr. Whenever the SEBS loading was higher than 5 pphr, the tensile strength decreased and a greater decrease was found in blends in which the HDPE concentration was more than 50 wt %. The log additivity rule model was applied to these blends, which showed that the blends containing the HIPS‐rich phase gave higher compatibility at the higher shear rates. Surprisingly, the blends containing the HDPE‐rich phase yielded greater compatibility at the lower shear rates. Morphology observations of the blends indicated better compatibility of the blends with increasing SEBS concentration. The relaxation time (T₂) values from the pulsed NMR measurements revealed that both polymer blends became more compatible when the SEBS concentration was increased. When integrating all the investigations of compatibility compared with the mechanical properties, it is possible to conclude that SEBS promotes a certain level of compatibilization for several ratios of HIPS/HDPE blends. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 742–755, 2004     

Influence of compatibilizers on mechanical properties,crystallization, and morphology of polypropylene/scrap rubber dust blends

Polypropylene blends containing a dispersed phase of scrap rubber dusts obtained from sport shoes manufacture; midsole (M, vulcanized EVA foam) and outsole (O, vulcanized rubber blend of NR, SBR, and BR) were studied. The influence of various compatibilizers on the mechanical properties of these blends were investigated. Significant development of impact strength was attained by using 6 and 10 phr of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers for both compounds filled with midsole and outsole dusts. The tensile strength of each compound was slightly decreased when the compatibilizer loading increased, whereas the elongation at break was significantly increased. The enhancements of the impact strength and the elongation at break are believed to arise from reduction of interfacial tension between two phases of the rubber and the PP, which results in some reduction of the particle size of the fillers. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the evidence of the reduction of scrap rubber dust into small rubber particle sizes in the compound, and also showed the occurrence of some fibrils. Optical microscopy (crossed polars) observations suggested that the addition of the rubber dust resulted in a less regular spherulite texture and less sharp spherulite boundaries. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 148–159, 2002     

Effects of addition of functionalized SEBS on rheological,mechanical, and tribological properties of polyamide 6 nanocomposites

The effects of the addition of styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS) with various functionalized groups on the rheological, mechanical, and tribological properties on polyamide 6 nanocomposite filled with layered silicate (PA6/Clay) were investigated. Four types of SEBS: unmodified SEBS (SEBS), maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA), amine group grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐NH₂), and carboxyl group grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐COOH) were added with PA6/Clay nanocomposite to prepare various polymer blends. These polymer blends were extruded by a twin screw extruder and injection molded. Dynamic viscoelastic properties of these blends in the molten state and their tensile, impact, and tribological properties were evaluated. The viscoelastic properties were found to increase with the addition of SEBS and were highly influenced by the types of functionalized groups contained. Influence of the addition of SEBS on the mechanical properties of these systems differed for each mechanical property. Although the tensile properties decreased with SEBS, Izod impact properties improved with the addition of various functionalized SEBS. These mechanical properties and viscoelastic properties correlated closely with the size of dispersed SEBS particles and interparticle distance. The tribological properties also improved with the addition of SEBS, and the influence of the amount added was higher than the type of SEBS used. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibilizing Effect of SEBS for Electrical Properties of LDPE/PS Blends

Summary: In the previous study, we observed compatibilizing effects of low density polyethylene (LDPE)/polystyrene (PS) with polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS), a triblock copolymer. Blends consisting of 70 wt.‐% LDPE and 30 wt.‐% PS were prepared with a SEBS concentration of up to 10 wt.‐%. This study examined the electrical properties such as the electrical breakdown, water tree length, permittivity and tan δ in the blends. The possibility of using these blends as insulating material substitutes for LDPE was investigated. The electrical breakdown strength reached a maximum of 66.67 kV/mm, which is superior to 50.27 kV/mm of the LDPE used as electrical insulators for cables. In addition, the water tree length decreased with increasing SEBS concentration. The water tree lengths of the blends containing SEBS were shorter than that of the LDPE. The permittivity of the blends was 2.28–2.48 F/m, and decreased with increasing SEBS concentration with the exception of S‐0. Tan δ of the blends increased smoothly with increasing SEBS content.

Breakdown strength , water tree length, permittivity and tan δ of the LDPE/PS/SEBS blends and raw materials.     

Water treeing,AC breakdown,and dielectric loss characteristics of EVA‐OH as a function of conversion rate

Four kinds of ethylene–vinyl acetate–vinyl alcohol (EVA–OH) terpolymers containing different contents of hydroxyl groups were prepared using the transesterification reaction between a ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer and alcohol. Structural and thermal analyses of the EVA‐OH produced were performed with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Electrical properties such as water treeing, AC breakdown, and dielectric loss characteristics were investigated. It was found that both water tree length and the probability of water tree generation decreased as a function of hydroxyl group content. AC breakdown characteristics such as average breakdown strength and characteristic breakdown strength (breakdown probability = 63.2%) of EVA improved as a function of the conversion rate of EVA‐OH from acetate to hydroxyl groups. Dielectric loss increased with hydroxyl group content in the low‐frequency range. In contrast, it was observed that dielectric loss decreased with hydroxyl group content in the high‐frequency range. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 420–424, 2006     

Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 12 blends with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene rubbers with and without maleation

Blends of polyamide 12 (PA12) with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA) were prepared by twin‐screw extrusion and injection molding. The morphology, mechanical properties, and dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were studied. The morphology of the blends was evaluated from the etched surfaces of cryogenically fractured specimens with scanning electron microscopy. The morphological parameters showed that the PA12/SEBS‐g‐MA blends (PM series) exhibited a finer and more uniform rubber dispersion than the PA12/SEBS blends (PS series) because of the interfacial chemical reactions. SEBS functionalization via maleic anhydride grafting strongly affected the morphological parameters, such as the domain size, interfacial area per unit of volume, and critical interparticle distance, but the distribution of the rubber domains in the blends was less affected. Tensile and impact studies showed that the PS blends had worse mechanical properties than the PM blends. The tensile strength and elongation at break of the PM blends were considerably greater than those of the PS blends. The fracture toughness and energy values determined for notched Charpy specimens in high‐speed impact tests were markedly higher for the PM blends than for the PS blends. A similar observation was obtained from instrumented falling weight impact studies. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed the incompatibility of the blend components because the glass‐transition temperatures of PA12 and the rubber phase (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) were not affected. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl polym Sci 95: 1376–1387, 2005     

Effect of LCP and rPET as reinforcing materials on rheology,morphology, and thermal properties of in situ microfibrillar‐reinforced elastomer composites

Microfibrillar‐reinforced elastomer composites based on two dispersed phases, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)(rPET), and styrene‐(ethylene butylene)‐styrene (SEBS) were prepared using extrusion process. The rheological behavior, morphology, and thermal stability of SEBS/LCP and SEBS/rPET blends containing various dispersed phase contents were investigated. All blends and LCP exhibited shear thinning behavior, whereas Newtonian fluid behavior was observed for rPET. The incorporation of both LCP and rPET into SEBS significantly improved the processability by bringing down the melt viscosity of the blend system. The fibrillation of LCP dispersed phase was clearly observed in as‐extruded strand with addition of LCP up to 20–30 wt %. Although the viscosity ratio of SEBS/rPET system is very low (0.03), rPET domains mostly appeared as droplets in as‐extruded strand. The results obtained from thermogravimetric analysis suggested that an addition of LCP and rPET into the elastomer matrix improved the thermal resistance significantly in air but not in nitrogen. The simultaneous DSC profiles revealed that the thermal degradation of all polymers examined were endothermic and exothermic in nitrogen and in air, respectively. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Thermal properties and adhesion strength of amorphous poly(α‐olefins)/styrene–ethylene–butylene copolymer/terpene hot‐melt adhesive

The thermal stability and adhesion properties, such as lap‐shear strength of hot‐melt adhesives were obtained from amorphous poly(α‐olefins) and thermoplastic rubber [styrene–ethylene–butylene copolymer (SEBS)] blends. The addition of SEBS increased the toughness and viscosity and decreased the lap‐shear strength of the hot‐melt adhesive. Terpene tackifier resin offered enhanced lap‐shear strength; this was more effective when combined tackifier resin was added on the hot‐melt adhesive. Only a small amount of wax and antioxidant affected the thermal stability and lap‐shear strength of the hot‐melt adhesive. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012