Relevant logic programming

In this paper we present a fragment of (positive) relevant logic which can be computed by a straightforward extension to SLD resolution while allowing full nesting of implications. These two requirements lead quite naturally to a fragment in which the major feature is an ambiguous user-level conjunction which is interpreted intensionally in query positions and extensionally in assertion positions. These restrictions allow a simple and efficient extension to SLD resolution (and more particularly, the PROLOG evaluation scheme) with quite minor loss in expressive power.     

Probabilistic logic programming on the web

We present the web application ‘cplint on SWI‐Prolog for SHaring that allows the user to write (SWISH)' Probabilistic Logic Programs and submit the computation of the probability of queries with a web browser. The application is based on SWISH, a web framework for Logic Programming. SWISH is based on various features and packages of SWI‐Prolog, in particular, its web server and its Pengine library, that allow to create remote Prolog engines and to pose queries to them. In order to develop the web application, we started from the PITA system, which is included in cplint , a suite of programs for reasoning over Logic Programs with Annotated Disjunctions, by porting PITA to SWI‐Prolog. Moreover, we modified the PITA library so that it can be executed in a multi‐threading environment. Developing ‘cplint on SWISH’ also required modification of the JavaScript SWISH code that creates and queries Pengines. ‘cplint on SWISH’ includes a number of examples that cover a wide range of domains and provide interesting applications of Probabilistic Logic Programming. By providing a web interface to cplint , we allow users to experiment with Probabilistic Logic Programming without the need to install a system, a procedure that is often complex, error prone, and limited mainly to the Linux platform. In this way, we aim to reach out to a wider audience and popularize Probabilistic Logic Programming. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Symmetric structure in logic programming

It is argued that some symmetric structure in logic programs could be taken into account when implementing semantics in logic programming. This may enhance the declarative ability or expressive power of the semantics. The work presented here may be seen as representative examples along this line. The focus is on the derivation of negative information and some other classic semantic issues. We first define a permutation group associated with a given logic program. Since usually the canonical models used to reflect the common sense or intended meaning are minimal or completed models of the program, we expose the relationships between minimal models and completed models of the original program and its so-called G-reduced form newly-derived via the permutation group defined. By means of this G-reduced form, we introduce a rule to assume negative information termed G-CWA, which is actually a generalization of the GCWA. We also develop the notions of G-definite, G-hierarchical and G-stratified logic programs,     

Tableaux for logic programming

We present a logic programming language, which we call Proflog, with an operational semantics based on tableaux and a denotational semantics based on supervaluations. We show the two agree. Negation is well behaved, and semantic noncomputability issues do not arise. This is accomplished essentially by dropping a domain closure requirement. The cost is that intuitions developed through the use of classical logic may need modification, though the system is still classical at a level once removed. Implementation problems are discussed very briefly; the thrust of the paper is primarily theoretical.Research partly supported by NSF Grant CCR-9104015.     

DISLOG: programming in logic with discontinuities

In this paper, we present an extension to PROLOG we call DISLOG which is designed to deal with relations between non-contiguous elements in a structure. This extension turns out to be well suited for syntactic analysis of natural and artificial languages. It is also well adapted to express traversal constraints in applications such as planning and expert systems and deductive systems involving, for example, temporal reasoning, DISLOG belongs to the constrained logic programming paradigm and turns out to be more declarative, transparent, and simple than PROLOG to deal with longdistance relations.     

Non-Horn clause logic programming without contrapositives

We present an extension of Prolog-style Horn clause logic programming to full first order logic. This extension has some advantages over other such extensions that have been proposed. We compare this method with the model elimination strategy which Stickel has recently implemented very efficiently, and with Loveland's extension of Prolog to near-Horn clauses. This new method is based on the author's simplified problem reduction format but permits a better control of the splitting rule than does the simplified problem reduction format. In contrast to model elimination, this new method does not require the use of contrapositives of clauses, permitting a better control of the search. This method has been implemented in C Prolog and has turned out to be a respectable and surprisingly compact first-order theorem prover. This implementation uses depth-first iterative deepening and caching of answers to avoid repeated solution of the same subgoal. We show that the time and space used by this method are polynomial functions of certain natural parameters of the search space, unlike other known methods. We discuss the relation of these upper bounds to Savitch's theorem relating nondeterministic time to deterministic space.This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant DCR-8516243.     

A logic programming system for nonmonotonic reasoning

The evolution of logic programming semantics has included the introduction of a new explicit form of negation, beside the older implicit (or default) negation typical of logic programming. The richer language has been shown adequate for a spate of knowledge representation and reasoning forms.The widespread use of such extended programs requires the definition of a correct top-down querying mechanism, much as for Prolog wrt. normal programs. One purpose of this paper is to present and exploit a SLDNF-like derivation procedure, SLX, for programs with explicit negation under well-founded semantics (WFSX) and prove its soundness and completeness. (Its soundness wrt. the answer-sets semantics is also shown.) Our choice ofWFSX as the base semantics is justi-fied by the structural properties it enjoys, which are paramount for top-down query evaluation.Of course, introducing explicit negation requires dealing with contradiction. Consequently, we allow for contradiction to appear, and show moreover how it can be removed by freely changing the truth-values of some subset of a set of predefined revisable literals. To achieve this, we introduce a paraconsistent version ofWFSX, WFSX _p , that allows contradictions and for which our SLX top-down procedure is proven correct as well.This procedure can be used to detect the existence of pairs of complementary literals inWESX _p simply by detecting the violation of integrity rulesf L, -L introduced for eachL in the language of the program. Furthermore, integrity constraints of a more general form are allowed, whose violation can likewise be detected by SLX.Removal of contradiction or integrity violation is accomplished by a variant of the SLX procedure that collects, in a formula, the alternative combinations of revisable literals' truth-values that ensure the said removal. The formulas, after simplification, can then be satisfied by a number of truth-values changes in the revisable, among true, false, and undefined. A notion of minimal change is defined as well that establishes a closeness relation between a program and its revisions. Forthwith, the changes can be enforced by introducing or deleting program rules for the revisable literals.To illustrate the usefulness and originality of our framework, we applied it to obtain a novel logic programming approach, and results, in declarative debugging and model-based diagnosis problems.     

A framed temporal logic programming language

We discuss the projection temporal logic (PTL), based on a primitive projection operator, prj. A framing technique is also presented, using which a synchronization operator, await, is defined within the underlying logic. A framed temporal logic programming language (FTLL) is presented. To illustrate how to use both the language and framing technique, some examples are given.     

Multimodal logic programming

We give a framework for developing the least model semantics, fixpoint semantics, and SLD-resolution calculi for logic programs in multimodal logics whose frame restrictions consist of the conditions of seriality (i.e. ) and some classical first-order Horn clauses. Our approach is direct and no special restriction on occurrences of □_i and _i is required. We apply our framework for a large class of basic serial multimodal logics, which are parameterized by an arbitrary combination of generalized versions of axioms T, B, 4, 5 (in the form, e.g. 4:□_i→□_j□_k) and I:□_i→□_j. Another part of the work is devoted to programming in multimodal logics intended for reasoning about multidegree belief, for use in distributed systems of belief, or for reasoning about epistemic states of agents in multiagent systems. For that we also use the framework, and although these latter logics belong to the mentioned class of basic serial multimodal logics, the special SLD-resolution calculi proposed for them are more efficient.     

Defeasible reasoning and logic programming

The general conditions of epistemic defeat are naturally represented through the interplay of two distinct kinds of entailment, deductive and defeasible. Many of the current approaches to modeling defeasible reasoning seek to define defeasible entailment via model-theoretic notions like truth and satisfiability, which, I argue, fails to capture this fundamental distinction between truthpreserving and justification-preserving entailments. I present an alternative account of defeasible entailment and show how logic programming offers a paradigm in which the distinction can be captured, allowing for the modeling of a larger range of types of defeat. This is possible through a natural extension of the declarative and procedural semantics of Horn clauses.     

Matlab与C混合编程实现Type-2模糊系统

Type-2模糊系统的理论有着广泛的应用,但是Type-2模糊系统结构较Type-1模糊系统复杂,且编程实现难度和计算强度都较大.Matlab平台下,运用M语言调试算法,在实现Type-2模糊系统的基础上,利用C语言的高效性优化算法,改进程序,克服了Matlab计算瓶颈的问题.给出的Matlab C混合编程实现Type-2模糊系统的程序,编译后可以函数的形式调用,既保留了Matlab平台处理数据的便捷性,又具有很高的执行效率.仿真结果表明该方法的有效性.     

Order-sorted logic programming with predicate hierarchy

Order-sorted logic has been formalized as first-order logic with sorted terms where sorts are ordered to build a hierarchy (called a sort-hierarchy). These sorted logics lead to useful expressions and inference methods for structural knowledge that ordinary first-order logic lacks. Nitta et al. pointed out that for legal reasoning a sort-hierarchy (or a sorted term) is not sufficient to describe structural knowledge for event assertions, which express facts caused at some particular time and place. The event assertions are represented by predicates with n arguments (i.e., n-ary predicates), and then a particular kind of hierarchy (called a predicate hierarchy) is built by a relationship among the predicates. To deal with such a predicate hierarchy, which is more intricate than a sort-hierarchy, Nitta et al. implemented a typed (sorted) logic programming language extended to include a hierarchy of verbal concepts (corresponding to predicates). However, the inference system lacks a theoretical foundation because its hierarchical expressions exceed the formalization of order-sorted logic. In this paper, we formalize a logic programming language with not only a sort-hierarchy but also a predicate hierarchy. This language can derive general and concrete expressions in the two kinds of hierarchies. For the hierarchical reasoning of predicates, we propose a manipulation of arguments in which surplus and missing arguments in derived predicates are eliminated and supplemented. As discussed by Allen, McDermott and Shoham in research on temporal logic and as applied by Nitta et al. to legal reasoning, if each predicate is interpreted as an event or action (not as a static property), then missing arguments should be supplemented by existential terms in the argument manipulation. Based on this, we develop a Horn clause resolution system extended to add inference rules of predicate hierarchies. With a semantic model restricted by interpreting a predicate hierarchy, the soundness and completeness of the Horn-clause resolution is proven.     

LMNtal as a hierarchical logic programming language

LMNtal (pronounced “elemental”) is a simple language model based on hierarchical graph rewriting that uses logical variables to represent connectivity and membranes to represent hierarchy. LMNtal is an outcome of the attempt to unify constraint-based concurrency and Constraint Handling Rules (CHR), the two notable extensions to concurrent logic programming. LMNtal is intended to be a substrate language of various computational models, especially those addressing concurrency, mobility and multiset rewriting. Although the principal objective of LMNtal was to provide a unifying computational model, it is of interest to equip the formalism with a precise logical interpretation. In this paper, we show that it is possible to give LMNtal a simple logical interpretation based on intuitionistic linear logic and a flattening technique. This enables us to call LMNtal a hierarchical, concurrent linear logic language.     

Multiple robot programming using a concurrent logic language

Advances in robotics has led to the cooperation of multiple robots among themselves and with their industrial automation environment. Efficient interaction with industrial robots thus becomes one of the key factors in the successful utilization of this modern equipment. When multiple manipulators have to be coordinated, there is a need for a new programming approach that facilitates and encompasses the needs of concurrency, synchronization, timing, and communication. Most robot languages have been developed with little attention being given to the integration of the robot with its environment. Currently, there is a gap between the robot capabilities, the task definition environment, and language facilities supplied to use robots.This paper analyzes the needs and then establishes that a concurrent logic programming approach is a step towards achieving a multi-robot knowledgeable task programming. In particular, the FCP dialect of concurrent Prolog is demonstrated, and analyzed.This research is partially supported by the Paul Ivanier Center for research in robots and production management.     

Autoepistemic logic programming

An autoepistemic logic programming language is derived from a subset of a three-valued autoepistemic logic, called 3AEL. Autoepistemic programs generalize several ideas underlying logic programming: stable, supported, and well-founded models, Fitting's semantics, Kunen's semantics, and abductive frameworks can all be captured through simple autoepistemic translations; moreover, SLDNF-resolution and a generate-and-test method for stable semantics are generalized to provide sound and complete proof methods for autoepistemic programs. These methods extend existing proof methods for 3AEL. Thus autoepistemic logic programming, besides contributing to the understanding of 3AEL, can be seen as a unifying framework for the theory of logic programs. It should also be regarded as a first step toward a flexible environment where different forms of inference can be formally integrated.This paper is an extended version of [8]. I am grateful to my advisor, Giorgio Levi, to Paolo Mancarella, who read the first version of the paper, and to the anonymous referees, whose comments led to sensible improvements.     

On the use of thresholds in multi-adjoint concept lattices

The size of the concept lattices increases exponentially from the number of objects and attributes. This situation is more complicated in the fuzzy case, in which the considered carriers to evaluate the objects and attributes, and for the relation, are also taken into account. Hence, it is very important to study mechanisms to reduce the size of fuzzy concept lattices maintaining the main information. One of the most important mechanisms to reduce the size of concept lattices is the use of thresholds in the concept-forming operators. This paper studies this mechanism in the general fuzzy framework of multi-adjoint concept lattices, obtaining interesting properties and consequences.     

Foundations of declarative testing in arbitrary logic programming

Declarative testing is very important in logic program developments, as without testing no one can guarantee that every program is definitely correct, no matter how elegant and high-level the programming languages used. Unfortunately, the activity of declarative testing for logic programs (or even the ordinary testing for conventional programs) has received little attention. There is little formal theory of testing, and attempts to develop a methodology of testing are rare. In this paper, we provide a theoretical foundation for declarative testing in arbitrary first order logic programming using recursion theories. In particular, we present a theoretical analysis of three kinds of declarative testing method: I/O testing, I/Y testing, and X/Y testing for logic programs.     

An experiment for truly parallel logic programming

A truly parallel logic programming system is proposed. The system is based on the commercially available parallel logic programming language STRAND, which has been extended in order to overcome the inherent limitations of such systems, like AND-type of parallelism, lack of backtracking, limited unification, etc. The system has been tested using an example from the area of natural language processing.     

Model transformation by example using inductive logic programming

Model transformation by example is a novel approach in model-driven software engineering to derive model transformation rules from an initial prototypical set of interrelated source and target models, which describe critical cases of the model transformation problem in a purely declarative way. In the current paper, we automate this approach using inductive logic programming (Muggleton and Raedt in J Logic Program 19-20:629–679, 1994) which aims at the inductive construction of first-order clausal theories from examples and background knowledge.

Improving inductive logic programming by using simulated annealing

In Inductive Logic Programming (ILP), algorithms that are purely of the bottom-up or top-down type encounter several problems in practice. Since a majority of them are greedy ones, these algorithms stop when finding clauses in local optima, according to the “quality” measure used for evaluating the results. Moreover, when learning clauses one by one, the induced clauses become less and less interesting as the algorithm is progressing to cover few remaining examples. In this paper, we propose a simulated annealing framework to overcome these problems. Using a refinement operator, we define neighborhood relations on clauses and on hypotheses (i.e. sets of clauses). With these relations and appropriate quality measures, we show how to induce clauses (in a coverage approach), or to induce hypotheses directly by using simulated annealing algorithms. We discuss the necessary conditions on the refinement operators and the evaluation measures to increase the effectiveness of the algorithm. Implementations (included a parallelized version of the algorithm) are described and experimentation results in terms of convergence of the method and in terms of accuracy are presented.