N application to winter wheat at tillering and shooting: N balance at different growth stages

At two sites, microplots under winter wheat were given 140 kg N ha^–1 as labelled ammonium nitrate split in 80 kg N ha^–1 at tillering and 60 kg N ha^–1 at shooting. Soil and plant samples were analyzed at shooting, after anthesis and at grain harvest and a¹⁵N balance was established. The average recovery rate of 95% indicates that there were no marked N losses due to leaching and denitrification, which is attributed to the low rainfall in the two months after fertilizer application. Between 19 and 23% of the fertilizer N remained in the 0–30 cm soil layer as organically bound soil N. Up to 64% was taken up by the above-ground crop. On the loamy sand, 4% of the fertilizer N at harvest remained in the roots in the 0–30 cm layer and only 3% was found as inorganic N in the 0–90 cm soil layer. The fertilizer N applied diminished plant uptake of soil N in the period between fertilizer application and harvest. As compared with the control, the fertilized plants extracted 25 and 28% less soil N from loamy sand and loess soil, respectively. The results show that application of mineral N fertilizer helps to maintain the mineralizable N content of the soil, which has been accumulated in the course of long-term intensive crop production, by adding N to the soil organic pool and simultaneously reducing the supply of soil N to the plants.     

Initial and residual effects of nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a Humic Nitosol and the fate and efficiency of the applied nitrogen

Initial and residual effects of nitrogen (N) fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a deep, well-drained Humic Nitosol (66% clay, 3% organic carbon) were evaluated. Enriched (¹⁵N) N fertilizer was used to study the fate of applied N in two seasons: using urea (banded) at 50 kg N ha^–1 in one season, and¹⁵N-enriched urea (banded), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, banded), and urea supergranules (USG, point placement) were applied in the other season (different field) at 100 kg N ha^–1. Nitrogen fertilizer significantly (P = 0.05) increased equivalent maize grain yield in each season of application with no significant differences between N sources, i.e., urea, CAN, and USG. Profitmaximizing rates ranged from 75 to 97 kg N ha^–1 and value: cost ratios ranged from 3.0 to 4.8. Urea gave the highest value: cost ratio in each season. Most (lowest measurement 81%) of the applied N was accounted for by analyzing the soil (to 150 cm depth) and plant material. Measurements for urea, CAN, and USG were not significantly different. The high N measurements suggest low losses of applied N fertilizer under the conditions of the study. Maize plant recovery ranged from 35 to 55%; most of this N (51–65%) was in the grain. Bean plant recovery ranged from 8 to 20%. About 34–43% of the applied N fertilizer remained in the soil, and most of it (about 70%) was within the top soil layer (0–30 cm). However, there were no significant equivalent maize grain increases in seasons following N application indicating no beneficial residual effect of the applied fertilizers.     

A microplot study of the fate of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea applied at two rates to ryegrass in spring

Confined microplots were used to study the fate of¹⁵N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea when applied to ryegrass in spring at 3 lowland sites (S1, S2 and S3). Urea and differentially and doubly labelled ammonium nitrate were applied at 50 and 100 kg N ha^–1. The % utilization of the¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was measured in 3 cuts of herbage and in soil to a depth of 15 cm (soil_0–15).Over all rates, forms and sites, the % utilization values for cuts 1, 2, 3 and soil_0–15 were 52.4, 5.3, 2.4 and 16.0% respectively. The % utilization of¹⁵N in herbage varied little as the rate of application increased but the % utilization in the soil_0–15 decreased as the rate of application increased. The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 indicated that losses of N increased from 12 to 25 kg N ha^–1 as the rate of N application was increased from 50 to 100 kg N ha^–1.The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates of fertilizer N application were 84.1, 80.8 and 81.0% for urea compared with 74.9, 72.5 and 74.4% for all ammonium nitrate forms at S1, S2 and S3 respectively. Within ammonium nitrate forms, the total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates and all sites were 76.7, 69.4 and 75.7% for¹⁵NH₄NO₃, NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ and¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ respectively. The utilization of the nitrate moiety of ammonium nitrate was lower than the utilization of the ammonium moiety.The distribution of labelled fertilizer between herbage and soil_0–15 varied with soil type. As the total utilization of labelled fertilizer was similar at all sites the cumulative losses due to denitrification and downward movement appeared to account for approximately equal amounts of N at each site.     

Nitrogen behavior in tropical wetland rice soils. 2. The efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen,priming effect and A-values

Results of tracer pot experiments show that in tropical wetland rice soils, rice plants recovered 50–69% of applied fertilizer N in the first cropping, 7–12% in the second cropping and 1–4% in the third cropping. Recovery of fertilizer N in the presence of incorporated rice straw was decreased to 45–53% (first cropping), 9–12% (second cropping), and 3–5% (third cropping), respectively. Application of fertilizer N resulted in the increase in plant uptake of native soil nitrogen due to priming effect which valued 3–29% of total N uptake by the rice plants. A-values calculated show overestimated amounts of available soil N in relation to plant uptake of native soil N. Perhaps their use in assessing fertilizer requirement in tropical wetland rice soils would be of limited meaning.     

Re-utilization by perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) of labelled fertilizer sulphur incorporated in field-grown tops and roots of pasture plants added to soils

³⁵S-labelled gypsum fertilizer was incorporated under field conditions into pastures which were separated into white clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) tops and roots. These were added to four soils from improved and unimproved pastures. The re-utilization of labelled fertilizer sulphur (S) was assessed under growth cabinet conditions (20°C day, 13°C night, daylength 16 h, light intensity 120–170 lx) by growing perennial ryegrass plants for 23 weeks.Mean recoveries of labelled fertilizer S varied from 7 to 20% depending on soil type, form amount and kind of plant residue added. Greater recovery was obtained from clover roots (9.5–16.2%) than grass roots (6.7–12.5%), and from grass tops (13.1–19.7%) than clover tops (9.7–17.9%). These results are related to contents of labelled S, total S, C/N, C/S and N/S ratios in plant residues which also accounted for their relative rates of decomposition. Ground (< 1 mm) and chopped (3 mm) roots increased labelled fertilizer S recovery by about 30% compared with whole roots. Additions of unlabelled fertilizer S influenced the recovery of labelled fertilizer S. This effect depends on the amounts of labelled grass roots and unlabelled fertilizer added.The significance of the findings is discussed with the aid of results from previous field experiments conducted on these soils.     

Movement and distribution of fertilizer nitrogen as affected by depth of placement in wetland rice

Experiments were conducted to monitor the movement and distribution of ammonium-N after placement of urea and ammonium sulfate supergranules at 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 cm. By varying depths of fertilizer placement, it is possible to determine the appropriate depth for placement machines. There were no significant differences in grain yields with nitrogen placed 5 and 15 cm deep. However, grain yields were significantly higher with deep placement of nitrogen than with split application of the fertilizer. The lower yields with split-applied nitrogen were due to higher nitrogen losses from the floodwater. The floodwater with split application had 78–98µg N ml^–1 and that with deep-placed nitrogen had a negligible nitrogen concentration.Movement of NH ₄ ⁺ -N in the soil was traced for various depths after fertilizer nitrogen application. The general movement after deep-placement of the ammonium sulfate supergranules was downward > lateral > upward from the placement site. Downward movement was prevalent in the dry season: fertilizer placed at 5–7.5 cm produced a peak of NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentration at 8–12 cm soil depth; with placement at 15 cm, the fertilizer moved to 12–20 cm soil depth. Fertilizer placed at 10 cm tended to be stable. In the wet season, deep-placed N fertilizer was fairly stable and downward movement was minimal.A substantially greater percentage of plant N was derived from¹⁵N-depleted fertilizer when deep-placed in the reduced soil layer than that applied in split doses. The percent N recovery with different placement depths, however, did not vary from each other. The results suggest that nitrogen placement at a 5-cm soil depth is adequate for high rice yields in a clayey soil with good water control. In farmers' fields where soil and water conditions are often less than ideal, however, it is desirable to place nitrogen fertilizer at greater depths and minimize NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentration in floodwater.     

Field study of the fate of labelled fertilizer nitrate applied to barley and maize in sandy soils

The recovery in crop and soil of labelled fertilizer nitrate applied to barley and maize growing on a sandy soil was measured. The experimental plots, each measuring 4m × 4m, were situated on fields growing with barley and with maize. The barley received 50 kg N/ha as KNO₃ enriched with 5.99 At.%¹⁵N excess while the maize received 113 kg N/ha as KNO₃ labelled with 5.014 At.%¹⁵N excess. Otherwise, the plots were treated the same as the rest of the field. At harvesting, the barley and the maize plots were subdivided into nine and six sub-plots respectively. Plant samples, including the roots and soil samples up to 1 m depth were collected in each sub-plot. Fertilizer N recovery in the samples was measured. In the plants, the N derived from the fertilizer (Ndff) was 24.0% and 16.7% in barley and maize, respectively. The percentage of the applied fertilizer recovered by barley was 57%; for maize, only 18%. The movement of fertilizer N was restricted to the top 50 cm in the barley plot, whereas in the maize plot, the fertilizer N could be detected down to 90 cm. The amount of fertilizer N remaining in the soil at harvest was 32% for the barley and 68% for the maize plot. The loss of fertilizer N under barley was 10% and 14% under maize. The loss was attributed mainly to denitrification. The means and the variances of total N uptake by plants inside the¹⁵N plot and outside the¹⁵N plot were compared. They did not differ significantly, indicating that the results obtained from the¹⁵N plot can be extrapolated to the rest of the field.     

Very high applications of nitrogen fertilizer on grassland and residual effects in the following season

At very high nitrogen applications (480 and more kg N ha^–1 yr^–1) in field trials on all-grass swards the amount of N applied exceeded the amount of N harvested. In the humid temperate climate of the Netherlands in the subsequent spring approximately 25, 40, and 50% of this excess nitrogen was recovered as accumulated mineral nitrogen in the 0–100 cm layer of sandy, clay and heavy clay soil, respectively. The effect of this excess nitrogen on growth during the subsequent season was measured through the increase in DM and N yield over a reference treatment. In this season all treatments received a uniform application (40 kg N ha^–1 cut^–1). Residual effects were absent on sandy soil but distinct on the clay soils. On the clay soils each accumulated kg soil mineral nitrogen produced 15 kg DM. Assuming a relatively small contribution of residual nitrogen carried over in stubble, roots and organic matter, the accumulated soil mineral nitrogen would seem to be as effective as applied fertilizer nitrogen.     

Fruit yield of Valencia sweet orange fertilized with different N sources and the loss of applied N

Nutrient management recommendations are needed to increase nitrogen uptake efficiency, minimize nutrient losses and reduce adverse effects on the environment. A study of the effects of nitrogen fertilization on N losses and fruit yield of 6-yr-old Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.) on Rangpur lime rootstock (C. limonia Osb.) grove was conducted in an Alfisol in Brazil from 1996 to 2001. Urea (UR) or ammonium nitrate (AN) fertilizers were surface-applied annually at rates of 20, 100, 180, and 260 kg N ha^–1 split into three applications from mid-spring to early fall. A semi-open trapping system, using H₃PO₄ + glycerol-soaked plastic foams, was used for selected treatments in the field to evaluate NH₃ volatilized from applied N fertilizers. Ammonia volatilization reached 26 to 44% of the N applied as UR at the highest rate of N used. Ammonia volatilization losses with AN were lower (4% of the N applied). On the other hand, AN resulted in greater nitrate leaching and greater soil acidification than UR. A marked effect of AN fertilizer on soil pH (CaCl₂) in the 0–20 cm depth layer was observed with a decrease of up to 1.7 pH units at the highest N rate. Acidification was followed by a decrease in exchangeable Ca and Mg; consequently, after 5 yr of fertilization with AN, soil base saturation dropped from 77% in the plots treated with 20 kg N ha^–1 per year, to 24% in those that received 260 kg N ha^–1 per year. The effect of N sources on fruit yield varied from year to year. In 2001, for a calculated N application rate of 150 kg ha^–1, the fertilizer efficiency index of UR was 75% of that of AN.     

Measurement and simulation of the effects of N-fertilizer on growth,plant composition and distribution of soil mineral-N in nationwide onion experiments

To aid the development of simulation models for N-response, N-fertilizer experiments with onions (Allium cepa L.) were carried out on 5 different sites. In each experiment, there was little loss of fertilizer-N in soil during the period between application and rapid crop growth and little loss of mineral N by leaching at any time. Even so, a substantial proportion of the N applied as fertilizer could not be accounted for in the crop and soil at harvest; the sum of soil mineral-N plus crop N (excluding fibrous roots) was always linearly related to N rate applied over the entire range (0–300 kg N ha^–1) and the gradient was always approximately the same, 0.64, irrespective of soil type or the amount of nitrate remaining in soil at harvest. Evidence was obtained that the phenomena resulted from roots retaining N and inducing immobilization at a rate proportional to soil nitrate concentration and that the proportionality constant was similar on all sites.Throughout plant growth there was little luxury consumption of N and the critical %N was related to plant mass by an equation previously deduced for other C3 crops (Plant and Soil 85, 163); plant nitrate concentration in the early stages increased with soil mineral-N (0–30 cm) to a maximum which varied from site to site but the nitrate concentration in the mature crop was always negligible. Plant yield in the early stages of growth generally declined with increase in fertilizer-N, despite the crops having been planted as sets and no more than 150 kg N ha^–1 broadcast at one time; but at maturity, yield always increased asymptotically with increase in fertilizer-N. Mineralization rates were approximately the same in the first as in the second half of each experiment. At harvest, residual soil mineral-N in the upper 30, 60 and 90 cm of soil increased with increase in fertilizer-N even when crop demand for N exceeded supply. At harvest in every experiment, the ratio of crop dry weight in the absence of added N to the maximum obtained was approximately equal to the ratio of plant %N (with no fertilizer) to critical %N.The various phenomena concerning yields, plant-N contents, and values of soil mineral-N at harvest were quite well simulated by a slightly modified version of a previously published model (Fert. Res. 18, 153) with few site-dependent inputs.     

Recovery of15N-labelled fertilizer by sugar beet—spring wheat and winter rye—sugar beet cropping sequences

The recovery of¹⁵N labelled ammonium fertilizer was studied during two cropping sequences: sugar beet—spring wheat and winter rye—sugar beet with the labelled N applied to the first crop of each sequence. The difference between fall and spring application was also investigated. For the first cropping sequence 100 kg N ha^–1 labelled with 11.4%¹⁵N atom excess (a.e.) was applied to the sugar beets. This labelled N was followed in the sugar beets, in the soil profile at harvesting time as well as in the spring wheat of the following year. The first crop of sugar beet recovered 43–46% of the applied N, with 26–29% remaining in the soil at harvesting time and 25–31% could not be accounted for. Of the residual N, less than 1% could be recovered by the next crop of spring wheat. For the second cropping sequence 50 kg N ha^–1 labelled with 11.5%¹⁵N a.e. was applied to the winter rye and followed in the winter rye and in the sugar beets of the following year. The recovery of the labelled fertilizer N applied to the winter rye of the second sequence was 20–27% and the sugar beets of the next year could only recover 2%. With respect to time of application, no difference in fertilizer N recovery was found between fall or spring application for the two sequences.     

Effectiveness of applying urea solution by furrow irrigation to wheat grown on raised beds of an impervious red-brown earth

The distribution and recovery of urea N (25 kg ha^–1) applied in solution by low-flow furrow irrigation to wheat, direct-drilled in rows in 1.5m wide permanent beds of a red-brown earth, was determined using¹⁵N labelled fertilizer. This method of fertilizer application resulted in an uneven distribution of applied N across the soil bed. Fertilizer N was recovered mainly in the upper 0.15m horizon of the soil. Forty seven percent of the applied N was recovered in the soil and plants within 0.20m of the point of application. Recovery rapidly decreased with increasing distance from the furrow and less than 4% of the urea N was recovered by the plants in the fourth row, 0.67m from the middle of the furrow. The recovery of fertilizer N in the crop was 23, 28, 47 and 40% at 13, 32, 59 and 86 days, respectively; the corresponding total recovery in the crop plus soil was 77, 91, 87 and 75%; the mean being 83 ± 8%.The results suggest that with this method of fertilizer application and these soil properties the furrows should be less than 0.75m apart in order to get uniform distribution of the fertilizer.     

Denitrification in shallow groundwater in a coastal agricultural area in Japan

In a coastal agricultural area in the central part of Japan (Shizuoka), we found decreasing nitrate concentration with depth in a shallow groundwater, where the depth to water table varied between 0.6 and 1.2 m below ground surface. High nitrate concentrations (5–29 mg N L^–1) were often observed in the upper layer (0–2 m) of the groundwater, but the concentration decreased to less than 1 mg N L^–1 in the deeper layer. Ammonium was scarcely detected, and the concentration of dissolved oxygen was usually low (< 1 mgO₂ L^–1) in the groundwater. Nitrate in the groundwater often had very heavy nitrogen stable isotope ratios (>20{}). There was a negative relationship between nitrogen stable isotope ratio of nitrate and its concentration. When nitrate was injected into the groundwater with acetylene and bromide (a conservative tracer), nitrate concentration decreased to 20% of the initial level within 5 days, accompanied by the increase in nitrite and nitrous oxide concentration and a little change in bromide concentration. These results indicate that microbial denitrification plays a potential role in the decrease of nitrate in shallow groundwater at the study site.     

Movement and transformations of fertigated nitrogen below trickle emitters and their effects on pH in the wetted soil volume

The movement and transformations of ammonium-, urea- and nitrate-N in the wetted volume of soil below the trickle emitter was studied in a field experiment following the fertigation of N as ammonium sulphate, urea and calcium nitrate. Effects on soil pH in the wetted volume were also investigated.During a fertigation cycle (emitter rate 2lh^–1) applied ammonium was concentrated in the surface 10 cm of soil immediately below the emitter and little lateral movement occurred. In contrast, because of their greater mobility in the soil, fertigated urea and nitrate were more evenly distributed down the soil profile below the emitter and had moved laterally in the profile to 15 cm radius from the emitter. The conversion of applied N to nitrate-N was more rapid when urea rather than ammonium-N was applied suggesting that the accumulation of large amounts of ammonium below the emitter in the ammonium sulphate treatment probably retarded nitrification.Following their conversion to nitrate-N, both fertigated ammonium sulphate and urea caused acidification in the wetted soil volume. Acidification was confined to the surface 20 cm of soil in the ammonium sulphate treatment, however because of its greater mobility, fertigation with urea (2lh^–1) resulted in acidification occurring down to a depth of 40 cm. Such subsoil acidity is likely to be very difficult to ameliorate. Increasing the trickle discharge rate from 2lh^–1 to 4lh^–1 reduced the downward movement of urea and encouraged its lateral spread in the surface soil. As a consequence, acidification was confined to the surface (0–20 cm) soil.     

Balance sheet of15N labelled urea applied to rice in three Australian vertisols differing in soil organic carbon

A glasshouse experiment was conducted to study the balance sheet of¹⁵N labelled urea at three rates (zero, 31.48 and 62.97 mmol N pot^–1) applied to rice under flooded conditions with two moisture regimes (continuous and alternate flooding) using three Australian vertisols differing in organic carbon level. Walkley-Black organic carbon values for the three soils were 0.65, 2.13 and 3.76 for the low carbon (LC), medium carbon (MC) and high carbon (HC) soils respectively.Rice dry weight and nitrogen uptake was significantly affected by N fertilizer rates, water regimes and soils. Alternate flooding gave much lower dry weight and nitrogen uptake than continuous flooding and the LC soil gave lower dry weight and nitrogen uptake than for the MC and HC soils.Recovery of¹⁵N labelled urea fertilizer in the rice plant was low (15.4 to 38.4%) and the¹⁵N urea not accounted for in the plant or soil and presumed lost was high (36.2 to 76.0%). Recovery was lower and loss higher under alternate flooding and for the LC soil. There was no effect of fertilizer rate. The results obtained stress the need for careful management to reduce losses of nitrogen fertilizer, particularly for soils low in organic carbon.     

我国需增加硝基肥产量,提升硝态氮施肥比例

论述了近年国内外生产和施用的氮肥中所含铵态氮和硝态氮的比例关系。硝态氮肥产量占全球氮肥总产量:世界约14%,欧盟约40%,而我国仅占2%。消费结构比例与产量比例相近。世界最大3家氮肥生产商Yara、Terra和PCS的主要产品为硝铵尿素溶液、硝酸盐等含硝态氮产品,产量和销售量占其氮肥总量的50%以上。加快发展我国硝基肥产业,提高硝态氮肥施用量,对优化我国施肥结构、提高肥料利用率有重要意义。     

Nitrogen application and underground water contamination in some agricultural soils of South Western Nigeria

The effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on nitrate leaching and contamination of underground and surface waters in a continuously cropped lowland area of South Western Nigeria has indicated a high potential for nitrate leaching.It was estimated that with 100 kg N ha^–1 applied, as much as 29.5 kg N ha^–1 could be lost through leaching below the root zone of a maize crop, Over a 3 year period the applied nitrogen contributed to nitrate pollution of underground water significantly in excess of the maximum level accepted for potable water. This was particularly high in valley bottoms where the nitrate nitrogen content ranged from 12.8 to 24.6 mg L^–1. Contribution to adjacent stream was, however, not significant.     

Control of nitrate pollution by application of controlled release fertilizer (CRF), compost and an optimized irrigation system

A nitrogenous controlled release fertilizer (Floranid 32) and a treatment of municipal organic waste compost were tested under two irrigation managements (conventional and ET-adjusted irrigation rates) with the aim of assessing risk of nitrate leaching to the aquifer. A check without N fertilizer was introduced. The experiment was carried out at La Poveda Field Station (30 km SE Madrid, Spain) in alluvial soils with water table depth at 4 m and under maize cropping. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications, allocating 12 plots to each irrigation management. Although N fertilizer rate (150 kg ha^–1) was reduced at half as related to a previous experiment, no difference in grain yields was observed. This result relates to a high content of soil-N. Floranid showed promising results in controlling N-leaching in comparison with urea that exhibited an accelerated rate of N release which finally determines low use of N by the plant and marked NO₃ ^– leaching. Treatment of municipal waste compost showed NO₃ ^– concentrations in the soil water solution of similar values as those of urea at 140 cm. ET-adjusted irrigation showed no drainage during the corn growing season and lower NO₃ ^– concentrations in the soil water solution which could indicate a general lower rate of N solubilization.     

Nitrate leaching and soil moisture prediction with the LEACHM model

The LEACHM model developed by Wagenet and Hutson [1989] was used to predict the mineral nitrogen and water content in the soil under a winter wheat crop from February to April in two years and three locations. The model grossly overestimated soil water content, probably due to the bad fitting of the assumed water retentivity function to the experimental data at high water contents, and to the presence of a relatively shallow water table (1.0–1.5m). Measured soil hydraulic conductivity varied with water content in a different manner than predicted by the model. By assuming a sandy or gravelly soil layer between the bottom of the measured soil profile and the water table, prediction of soil water content improved considerably. Simulation showed that, under the experimental conditions studied, soil mineral nitrogen varied mainly due to the fertilizer additions, mineralization and denitrification. Nitrogen uptake by plants and leaching were small. Low values of nitrate leaching were predicted by the model because of low drainage. Large differences between predicted and observed values in the mineral nitrogen in the soil occurred in some cases, both in the total amount and its profile distribution.     

Nitrogen uptake efficiency in maize production using irrigation water high in nitrate

In order to achieve efficient use of nitrogen (N) and minimize pollution potentials, producers of irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) must make the best use of N from all sources. This study was conducted to evaluate crop utilization of nitrate in irrigation water and the effect N fertilizer has on N use efficiencies of this nitrate under irrigated maize production. The study site is representative of a large portion of the Central Platte Valley of Nebraska where ground water nitrate-N (NO₃-N) concentrations over 10 mg L^–1 are common. Microplots were established to accommodate four fertilizer N rates (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg ha^–1) receiving irrigation water containing three levels of NO₃-N (0, 10, 20 mg L^–1). Stable isotope¹⁵N was applied as a tracer in the irrigation water for treatments containing 10 and 20 mg L^–1 NO₃-N. Plots that did not receive nitrate in the irrigation water where tagged with¹⁵N fertilizer as a sidedress treatment. Sidedressed N fertilizer significantly reduced irrigation-N uptake efficiencies. When residual N uptake is added to first year plant usage, total irrigation NO₃-N uptake efficiencies are similar to total sidedress N fertilizer uptake efficiencies for our cropping system over the two year period. Efficiency of irrigation-N use depends on crop needs and availability of N from other sources during the irrigation season.