Synthesis and properties of novel amphiphilic sulfated ionomers by the ring‐opening reaction of an epoxidized styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer

A method for the synthesis of novel sulfated ionomer of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) was developed. SBS was first epoxidized by performic acid in the presence of a phase‐transfer catalyst; this was followed by a ring‐opening reaction with an aqueous solution of alkali salt of bisulfate. The optimum conditions for the ring‐opening reaction of the epoxidized SBS with an aqueous solution of KHSO₄ were studied. During the ring‐opening reaction, both phase‐transfer catalyst and ring‐opening catalyst were necessary to enhance the conversion of epoxy groups to ionic groups. The products were characterized with Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). After the potassium ions of the ionomer were substituted with lead ions, the lead sulfated ionomer exhibited dark spots under TEM. Some properties of the sulfated ionomer were studied. With increasing ionic groups or ionic potential of the cations, the water absorbency and emulsifying volume of the ionomer and the intrinsic viscosity of the ionomer solution increased, whereas the oil absorbency decreased. The sulfated ionomer possessed excellent emulsifying properties compared with the sulfonated SBS ionomer. The sodium sulfated ionomers in the presence of 10% zinc stearate showed better mechanical properties than the original SBS. When the ionomer was blended with crystalline polypropylene, a synergistic effect occurred with respect to the tensile strength. The ionomer behaved as a compatibilizer for blending equal amounts of SBS and oil‐resistant chlorohydrin rubber. In the presence of 3% ionomer, the blend exhibited much better mechanical properties and solvent resistance than the blend without the ionomer. SEM photographs indicated improved compatibility between the two components of the blend in the presence of the ionomer. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Novel method for preparation of quaternary ammonium ionomer from epoxidized styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer and its use as compatibilizer for blending of styrene–butadiene–styrene and chlorosulfonated polyethylene

A novel method for the preparation of a quaternary ammonium ionomer of styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (SBS) was developed by a ring‐opening reaction of epoxidized SBS with triethylamine hydrochloride in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst. The optimum conditions were studied. The ionomer was characterized by quantitative analysis, IR spectroscopy, and ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy. Its water absorbency, oil absorbency, dilute solution viscosity, and use as a compatibilizer for the blending of SBS and chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE) were investigated. The results showed that, under optimum conditions, the epoxy groups can be completely converted to the quaternary ammonium groups. The IR spectrum did not exhibit the absorption peak for quaternary ammonium groups, whereas the ¹H‐NMR spectrum and titration method demonstrated it. With increasing ionic group content, the water absorbency of the ionomer increased whereas its oil absorbency decreased. These indicated the amphiphilic character of the SBS ionomer. The dilute solution viscosity of the ionomer in toluene/methanol (9/1) solvent increased with increasing quaternary ammonium group content. The ionomer was used as a compatibilizer for the blends of SBS and CSPE. The addition of a small amount of the ionomer to the blend enhanced the mechanical properties of the blends: 2 wt % ionomer based on the blend increased the tensile strength and ultimate elongation of the blend nearly 2 times. The blends of equal parts SBS and CSPE behaved as oil‐resistant thermoplastic elastomers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1975–1980, 2006     

Behavior of ionomers of sulfonated styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer in polymer blends with crystalline polyolefins and as compatibilizer

The blends of ionomers of sulfonated (styrene–butadiene–styrene) triblock copolymer with two polyolefins as well as the blends of polystyrene (PSt) with two polar, oil‐resistant elastomers, i.e., chlorohydrin rubber (CHR) and chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE), using the ionomer as compatibilizer were studied. The blends of the ionomer with polypropylene or high density polyethylene showed synergistic effects with respect to tensile strength. With increasing PSt content, the blends change their behavior from thermoplastic elastomer to toughened plastics. The synergism is probably because of the thermoplastic interpenetrating polymer networks formed in the blend. The blends exhibited high resistance against diesel oil or toluene. When PSt was blended with CHR or CSPE using the ionomer as compatibilizer, only 2 or 3% ionomer was needed to enhance the mechanical properties of the blends. The effect is due to the ion–polar interaction of the ionomer with the polar polymer. The enhanced compatibility of the blends by the ionomer was demonstrated by DSC and Scanning electron micrograph. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1887–1894, 2006     

Synthesis of a maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene–butadiene copolymer and its application in polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer/organophilic montmorillonite composites as a compatibilizer

A maleic anhydride grafted propylene–butadiene copolymer (MPPB) was prepared. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and ¹H‐NMR results indicate that the maleic anhydride molecules reacted with the double bond in the butadiene unit of the propylene–butadiene copolymer (PPB), and the grafting percentage increased with the butadiene content in the initial copolymer. The gel permeation chromatography results show that the introduction of butadiene in the copolymer prevented the degradation of PPB. The MPPB was applied in polypropylene (PP)/styrene‐butadiene‐styrene triblock copolymer (SBS)/organophilic montmorillonite (OMMT) composites as a compatibilizer. In the presence of 10‐phr MPPB, the impact strength of the composite was improved by about 20%. X‐ray diffraction patterns indicated the formation of the β‐phase crystallization of PP in the presence of MPPB, and a significant decrease in the spherulite size was observed. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed that the OMMT was better dispersed in the matrix upon the inclusion of MPPB. A better distribution of the rubber phase and a rugged fracture surface were observed in the scanning electron microscopy images as the MPPB proportion was increased. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Synthesis of amphiphilic graft copolymers of SBS with acrylamide and study of their properties

Graft copolymerization of SBS in the form of sodium ionomer with acrylamide in emulsion using benzoyl peroxide as initiator and sodium ionomer of maleated SBS as a self‐emulsifier, which can form a stable cyclohexane/water emulsion with AM without using any other emulsifier, was carried out. Factors affecting the graft copolymerization were studied. The grafting % can reach about 15%. Emulsifying properties of sodium ionomer of maleated SBS and the graft copolymer, as well as the compatibilizing effect of the graft copolymer in blending polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with SBS, were studied. The sodium ionomer of maleated SBS, the graft copolymers, and the blends were characterized with IR and DSC. The results showed that water absorbency and emulsifying volume increase obviously after graft copolymerization with AM. 0.2 g of the graft copolymer containing 14 wt % PAM grafts can emulsify a mixture of 30 mL toluene and 70 mL water completely. The graft copolymer can be used as an effective compatibilizer in the blending of PVC and SBS, more effective than the sodium ionomer of maleated SBS. Only 2 wt % of the copolymer based on the blend used in blending is enough to raise the tensile strength three times. The blends with weigh ratios of PVC/SBS at 3/7–4/6 in the presence of the graft copolymer behave as thermoplastic elastomers with a tensile strength of 14 MPa, an ultimate elongation of 750%, and a permanent set of 17%. Glass transition temperatures of the blend shifted inward in the presence of the graft copolymer. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1248–1253, 2005     

Curing behaviour and mechanical properties of dicarboxylated telechelic poly(ε-caprolactone)s/styrene–(epoxidized butadiene)–styrene triblock copolymer reactive blends

End-carboxylated telechelic poly(ε-caprolactone)s (XPCLs) with different molecular weights were blended into a triblock copolymer of styrene–(epoxidized butadiene)–styrene (ESBS) to investigate the curing behaviour and the mechanical properties of the XPCL/ESBS binary reactive blend. It was found that the time–torque cure curve showed a significant torque increase after a very short induction period, in which the degree of the torque increase depended on the molecular weight of XPCL. This indicates that substantial crosslinking reaction takes place between the XPCLs and the epoxidized polybutadiene of the ESBS. Stress–strain curves of the blends after cure depended on the molecular weight of XPCL and the blend ratio. The XPCL/ESBS blends had sufficient thermal stability to show elastomeric behaviour at elevated temperature above the glass transition of the styrene domains of ESBS because of formation of crosslinking points between unlike polymer components by the reactive blending. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene/polycarbonate blends with styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer

The importance of alloys and blends has increased gradually in the polymer industry so that the plastics industry has moved toward complex systems. The main reasons for making polymer blends are the strengthening and the economic aspects of the resultant product. In this study, I attempted to improve compatibility in a polymer blend composed of two normally incompatible constituents, namely, acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC), through the addition of a compatibilizer. The compatibilizing agent, styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymer (SBS), was added to the polymer blend in ratios of 1, 5, and 10% with a twin‐screw extruder. The morphology and the compatibility of the mixtures were examined by scanning electron microscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. Further, all three blends of ABS/PC/SBS were subjected to examination to obtain their yield and tensile strengths, elasticity modulus, percentage elongation, Izod impact strength, hardness, heat deflection temperature, Vicat softening point, and melt flow index. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2521–2527, 2004     

The influence of styrene–butadiene diblock copolymer on styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer viscoelastic properties and product performance

The effects of the styrene–butadiene (SB) diblock copolymer on the viscoelastic properties of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) triblock copolymers were examined in both in the the neat state and within specific product applications. The addition of the SB diblock copolymer into a pure SBS triblock copolymer resulted in a significant decrease in the plateau storage modulus and a quantitative linear rise in tan delta. In a pure triblock, in which all endblocks are anchored in polystyrene domains, all entanglements are physically trapped. The SB diblock embodies untrapped polybutadiene endblocks that are able to relax stress by chain reptation through the rubbery polybutadiene matrix. The SB diblock copolymer quantitatively lowered the microphase separation temperature (MST) of the SBS triblock copolymer. These changes in linear viscoelastic behavior manifest themselves into a reduction in the efficiency and performance of the SBS triblock copolymer in asphalt pavement binders and hot-melt adhesive blends. Specifically, the SB diblock diminished the complex shear modulus and elasticity of a polymer-modified asphalt, which translated into lower predicted rutting specification values. The increase in diblock content altered the viscoelastic response of the hot-melt adhesive blend, translating into a reduction in the shear holding power and shear adhesion failure temperature. The lack of network participation, coupled with the relaxation of the polybutadiene endblocks, accounts for the lower strength and greater temperature susceptibility of the diblock-containing systems. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Blends of SBS triblock copolymer with poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polystyrene mixture

Blends of styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) or styrene–ethylene/1‐butene–styrene (SEBS) triblock copolymers with a commercial mixture of polystyrene (PS) and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) were prepared in the melt at different temperatures according to the chemical kind of the copolymer. Although solution‐cast SBS/PPO and SBS/PS blends were already known in the literature, a general and systematic study of the miscibility of the PS/PPO blend with a styrene‐based triblock copolymer in the melt was still missing. The thermal and mechanical behavior of SBS/(PPO/PS) blends was investigated by means of DSC and dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DMTA). The results were then compared to analogous SEBS/(PPO/PS) blends, for which the presence of a saturated olefinic block allowed processing at higher temperatures (220°C instead of 180°C). All the blends were further characterized by SEM and TGA to tentatively relate the observed properties with the blends' morphology and degradation temperature. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 2698–2705, 2003     

Effect of styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer structure on its compatibilization efficiency in PS/PB and PS/PP blends

Two styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymers differing in the length of their styrene blocks (40S‐60B‐40S and 10S‐60B‐10S) were used as compatibilizers for PS/PB (4/1) and PS/PP (4/1) blends. The supramolecular structure of the copolymers determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), morphology of the blends using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and their tensile impact strength were chosen as criteria of the compatibilization efficiency of the copolymers used. Different mechanisms of compatibilization for “symmetrical” system (PS/PB/SBS) and “asymmetrical” system (PS/PP/SBS) were proved. While for the PS/PB blend, the 40S‐60B‐40S copolymer proved to be a good compatibilizer, for the PS/PP blend, surprisingly, the 10S‐60B‐10S copolymer is more efficient.     

Effect of the addition of acrylonitrile/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM)/styrene graft copolymer on the morphology–properties relationships in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/EPDM rubber blends

Blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acylonitrile) (SAN) with ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) rubber were investigated. An improved toughness–stiffness balance of the SAN/EPDM blend was obtained when an appropriate amount of acrylonitrile–EPDM–styrene (AES) graft copolymer was added, prepared by grafting EPDM with styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer, and mixed thoroughly with both of the two components of the blend. Morphological observations indicated a finer dispersion of the EPDM particles in the SAN/EPDM/AES blends, and particle size distribution became narrower with increasing amounts of AES. Meanwhile, it was found that the SAN/EPDM blend having a ratio of 82.5/17.5 by weight was more effective in increasing the impact strength than that of the 90/10 blend. From dynamic mechanic analysis of the blends, the glass‐transition temperature of the EPDM‐rich phase increased from ?53.9 to ?46.2°C, even ?32.0°C, for the ratio of 82.5/17.5 blend of SAN/EPDM, whereas that of the SAN‐rich phase decreased from 109.2 to 108.6 and 107.5°C with the additions of 6 and 10% AES copolymer contents, respectively. It was confirmed that AES graft copolymer is an efficient compatibilizer for SAN/EPDM blend. The compatibilizer plays an important role in connecting two phases and improving the stress transfer in the blends. Certain morphological features such as thin filament connecting and even networking of the dispersed rubber phase may contribute to the overall ductility of the high impact strength of the studied blends. Moreover, its potential to induce a brittle–ductile transition of the glassy SAN matrix is considered to explain the toughening mechanism. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1685–1697, 2004     

Viscoelastic relaxation of styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymers with different topological structures

The viscoelastic relaxation of linear styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (l‐SBS) and star styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer (s‐SBS) with four arms were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic rheological measurements. Three characteristic viscoelastic responses of l‐SBS and s‐SBS in the plot of the loss tangent (tan δ) and temperature at different frequencies (ω's), which corresponded to the relaxation of the polybutadiene (PB) block (peak I), the glass transition of the polystyrene (PS) phase (peak II), and the mutual diffusion between the PB blocks and PS blocks (peak III), respectively, were observed in the experimental range. Although ω was 0.1 rad/s, a noticeable peak III was gained for both l‐SBS and s‐SBS. The dynamic storage modulus (G′) of l‐SBS showed two distinct types of behavior, depending on the temperature. At temperature (T) < T₂ (where T₂ is the temperature corresponding to peak II), G′ of l‐SBS displayed a very weak ω dependency. In contrast, at T > T₂, G′ decayed much more rapidly. However, G′ of s‐SBS displayed a very weak ω dependency at both T < T₂ and T > T₂. Only near T₂ did s‐SBS decay with ω a little sharply. These indicated, in contrast to l‐SBS, that s‐SBS still exhibited more elasticity even at T > T₂ because of its crosslinking point between the PB blocks (the star structure). In the lower ω range, l‐SBS exhibited a stronger peak III than s‐SBS despite the same styrene content for l‐SBS and s‐SBS. The high tan δ value of peak III for l‐SBS was considered to be related to the internal friction among the PB blocks or the whole l‐SBS chain, not the PS blocks. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Structure and properties of polyamides‐epoxidized elastomers blends

Blends of aliphatic polyamides (PA6, PA66, and PA12), containing 0–15 wt % nonepoxidized or epoxidized elastomers (statistical copolymer butadiene–styrene BS/EBS or linear block copolymer styrene–butadiene–styrene SBS/ESBS) were investigated. For PA6‐elastomer blends, taken as an example, it was shown that with increasing blending time, mechanical properties of blends increase, especially, if ESBS copolymer is used. It can be treated as an indirect sign of reactions between components. It was also found that in blends considerable changes of glass temperatures of components occur. Polyamides in blends with elastomers have smaller heats of fusion in comparison with virgin polyamides. It testifies to hindering of PA crystallization by elastomers. In some cases, significant shifts of melting points are also observed. Measurements of water contact angle show that all blends have very similar values of contact angles, which are lower than those of virgin polyamides. Elastomer content does not also affect the blend water uptake. However, it depends on the polyamide and elastomer type contrary to contact angle. Highest water uptake changes are observed in blends of PA66, especially for epoxidized elastomers. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 1872–1879, 2006     

Blends of i‐PP and SBS. II. Influence of in situ compatibilization on the mechanical properties

This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotatic polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by use of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP–MAH) and SBS (SBS–MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends of i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS–MAH with varying diamine/anhydride molar ratios were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends were determined by tensile and impact‐resistance tests. The optimum improvement in the mechanical properties was found when the diamine/anhydride molar ratio in the ternary reactive blends was 0.5/1. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 516–522, 2003     

Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene toughened nylon 6: The influences of compatibilizer on morphology and impact properties

Polymer alloys have been used as an alternative to obtain polymeric materials with unique physical properties. Generally, the polymer mixture is incompatible, which makes it necessary to use a compatibilizer to improve the interfacial adhesion. Nylon 6 (PA6) is an attractive polymer to use in engineering applications, but it has processing instability and relatively low notched impact strength. In this study, the acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) triblock copolymer was used as an impact modifier for PA6. Poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anyhydride) (MMA‐MA) and poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (MMA‐GMA) were used as compatibilizers for this blend. The morphology and impact strength of the blends were evaluated as a function of blend composition and the presence of compatibilizers. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited an impact strength up to 800 J/m and a morphology with ABS domains more efi8ciently dispersed. Moderate amounts of MA functionality in the compatibilizer (～5%) and small amounts of compatibilizer in the blend (～5%) appear sufficient to improve the impact properties and ABS dispersion. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 842–847, 2003     

Compatibilization effects of styrenic/rubber block copolymers in polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Compatibilizing effects of styrene/rubber block copolymers poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) (SBS), poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP), and two types of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS), which differ in their molecular weights on morphology and selected mechanical properties of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) 70/30 blend were investigated. Three different concentrations of styrene/rubber block copolymers were used (2.5, 5, and 10 wt %). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine the phase morphology of blends. The SEM analysis revealed that the size of the dispersed particles decreases as the content of the compatibilizer increases. Reduction of the dispersed particles sizes of blends compatibilized with SEP, SBS, and low‐molecular weight SEBS agrees well with the theoretical predictions based on interaction energy densities determined by the binary interaction model of Paul and Barlow. The SEM analysis confirmed improved interfacial adhesion between matrix and dispersed phase. The TEM micrographs showed that SBS, SEP, and low‐molecular weight SEBS enveloped and joined pure PS particles into complex dispersed aggregates. Bimodal particle size distribution was observed in the case of SEP and low‐molecular weight SEBS addition. Notched impact strength (a_k), elongation at yield (ε_y), and Young's modulus (E) were measured as a function of weight percent of different types of styrene/rubber block copolymers. The a_k and ε_y were improved whereas E gradually decreased with increasing amount of the compatibilizer. The a_k was improved significantly by the addition of SEP. It was found that the compatibilizing efficiency of block copolymer used is strongly dependent on the chemical structure of rubber block, molecular weight of block copolymer molecule, and its concentration. The SEP diblock copolymer proved to be a superior compatibilizer over SBS and SEBS triblock copolymers. Low‐molecular weight SEBS appeared to be a more efficient compatibilizer in PP/PS blend than high‐molecular weight SEBS. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 291–307, 1999     

Compatibility of poly(vinyl chloride) with epoxidized copolymers of butadiene-styrene

The compatibility of poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) with epoxidized styrene-butadiene copolymers is examined at different levels of epoxidation. The copolymers modified were a random (SBR) containing 45 wt% styrene and a triblock (SBS) with 30 wt% bound styrene. Blends were examined in the complete composition range and the approximate levels of epoxidation to ensure blend miscibility were determined. Epoxidized SBS (ESBS) was more effective in miscibility compared with ESBR requiring a lesser degree of epoxidation (43 versus 46 mol%). Tensile properties of the ESBS/PVC blends showed the efficiency of ESBS as a polymeric plasticizer even at levels of epoxidation (ca. 35 mol%) where immiscibility sets in.     

Effect of styrene–isoprene–styrene,styrene–butadiene–styrene,and styrene–butadiene–rubber on the mechanical,thermal, rheological,and morphological properties of polypropylene/polystyrene blends

The mechanical, thermal, rheological, and morphological properties of polypropylene (PP)/polystyrene (PS) blends compatibilized with styrene–isoprene–styrene (SIS), styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS), and styrene–butadiene–rubber (SBR) were studied. The incompatible PP and PS phases were effectively dispersed by the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR as compatibilizers. The PP/PS blends were mechanically evaluated in terms of the impact strength, ductility, and tensile yield stress to determine the influence of the compatibilizers on the performance properties of these materials. SIS‐ and SBS‐compatibilized blends showed significantly improved impact strength and ductility in comparison with SBR‐compatibilized blends over the entire range of compatibilizer concentrations. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated compatibility between the components upon the addition of SIS, SBS, and SBR by the appearance of shifts in the melt peak of PP toward the melting range of PS. The melt viscosity and storage modulus of the blends depended on the composition, type, and amount of compatibilizer. Scanning electron microscopy images confirmed the compatibility between the PP and PS components in the presence of SIS, SBS, and SBR by showing finer phase domains. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 266–277, 2003     

High‐speed photocrosslinking of thermoplastic styrene–butadiene elastomers

Photoinitiated thiol/ene polymerization was used to crosslink a triblock styrene/butadiene/styrene (SBS) polymer of low vinyl content (8%). The crosslinking process was followed by infrared spectroscopy (loss of unsaturation), insolubilization, swelling, and hardness measurements. The photogenerated thiyl radicals react with both the vinyl and the 2‐butene double bonds of the copolymer. Concentrations of less than 1 wt % in the trifunctional thiol crosslinker and in the acylphosphine oxide photoinitiator proved to be sufficient to create, within 0.5 s, a permanent chemical network in the elastomeric phase. This UV‐curing technology was successfully applied to crosslink rapidly commercial SBS–Kraton® thermoplastic elastomers. It proved also effective in the case of the much less reactive triblock styrene/isoprene/styrene (SIS) polymer which contains no vinyl double bonds. The thiol/ene polymerization was shown to be a much more efficient process to crosslink SBS and SIS thermoplastic elastomers than was the copolymerization of the rubber double bonds with a diacrylate monomer. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1902–1912, 2000     

Characterization of end‐functionalized styrene–butadiene–styrene copolymers and their application in modified asphalt

End amino, carboxylic acid, and hydroxyl functionalized styrene–butadiene–styrene (SBS) triblock copolymers were prepared with 1,5‐diazabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane, carbon dioxide, and epoxy ethane as capping agents, respectively. The effects of the end polar groups on the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. Transmission electron microscopy images suggested that the group at the end of the polystyrene (PS) segment made the morphology of the PS domains disordered and incompact. Dynamic mechanical results showed that the storage and loss modulus increased after SBS was end‐functionalized. End amino and carboxylic acid groups improved the compatibility and storage stability of SBS‐modified asphalt. However, the effect of the end‐hydroxyl group on the improvement of the storage stability of SBS‐modified asphalt was not obvious. The differential scanning calorimetry analysis of SBS‐modified asphalt further showed that the compatibility and storage stability of SBS‐modified asphalt were improved by the attachment of amino or carboxylic acid groups through the anionic polymerization method. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 8–16, 2007