The relationship between ethnicity and advance directives in a frail older population

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between ethnicity and Health Care wishes, including Advance Directives, in a group of frail older persons in PACE (Program For All Inclusive Care Of The Elderly). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 1193 participants in the PACE program. SETTING: Program of All Inclusive Care Of The Elderly (PACE), a comprehensive managed care demonstration program serving frail older participants at 10 sites across the nation. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1193 older adults, all of whom met state criteria for nursing home level of care. There were 385 non-Hispanic whites, 364 blacks, 156 Hispanics, and 288 Asians. MEASUREMENTS: Presence or absence of advance directives, type of health care wishes selected including living will, durable power of attorney, and health care proxy. RESULTS: Frail older white, black, Hispanic and Asian Americans differ significantly in their health care wishes and how they choose to express them. Blacks were significantly more likely to select aggressive interventions and less likely than non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics to utilize a written instrument for expressing health care wishes. Whites were significantly more likely to utilize written documents for advance directives, whereas Asians were more likely to select less aggressive interventions but were unlikely to use written advance directives. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, we found significant ethnic variations in choice of health care wishes. Although health care wishes are an individual decision, an awareness of cross cultural patterns can assist practitioners in addressing the concerns of their patients, as well as assisting Health Care Policy Development.     

Advance directives for mental health care: An analysis of state statutes.

State statutes enabling individuals to draft written durable advance directives for health care have approached future decisions about mental health care and treatment in several quite different ways. While some states incorporate mental health care into the generic advance directive law, others exclude some kinds of mental health care from the generic law, and a growing number of states have established distinct processes for mental health directives. The author surveys the state statutes and examines the extent to which the statutes may create barriers to the use of advance directives by people with mental illness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

NIDDM incidence in a tri-ethnic population of diagnosed hypertensives

OBJECTIVE: Significant racial/ethnic differences exist in the prevalence of hypertension (HTN) and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The purpose of this study was to determine if ethnicity (African-American, Hispanic and non-Hispanic white) was related to NIDDM incidence over a maximum follow-up period of 10 years. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A large, urban public health care system serving over 200,000 predominantly minority persons. The system includes nine primary care health centers. PATIENTS: African-American, Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients with diagnosed hypertension who received primary care in the study setting. METHODS: Medical records of 2,941 hypertensives free of NIDDM at their baseline visit were reviewed to document incident NIDDM during follow-up. Sociodemographic characteristics and physiologic covariates consistently available in the medical record (blood pressure, height, weight, and blood glucose) were also abstracted. RESULTS: The mean age of patients at the baseline visit was 56 years; 67% were female, 63% were African-American. 17% Hispanic, and 20% non-Hispanic white. Two hundred thirty-six incident cases of NIDDM were identified in the cohort. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, the risk of developing NIDDM was not related to ethnicity either in univariate analysis or after adjusting for age, baseline blood glucose, and body mass index (adjusted RR for African Americans compared with whites = .82, 95% CI = .57-1.18; adjusted RR for Hispanics compared with whites = .84, 95% CI = .51-1.38). CONCLUSION: The lack of association between ethnicity and NIDDM risk among hypertensives is unexpected, and may indicate differences in the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie the development of hypertension and NIDDM in these three ethnic groups.     

Advance directives: the emerging body of research

BACKGROUND: With the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act in 1990, new procedures and documents became available for planning end-of-life care. These new procedures and documents are now being examined scientifically. OBJECTIVE: To review existing research on the use of advance directives. DATA SOURCES: Computer search using Grateful Med software from the National Library of Medicine with MEDLINE and BIOETHICSLINE databases. STUDY SELECTION: Studies that showed an emerging consensus or reported vastly differing results were selected. Selected studies examined these specific areas: demographic data on patients with advance directives, completion rates, capacity to complete, patients' preferences, stability of patients' decisions over time, treatment choices, proxy decision makers, treatment provided, and cost. RESULTS: The body of important research about advance directives is growing. A profile of their clinical utility is emerging. CONCLUSIONS: The research done so far can stimulate future research and can begin to suggest possible changes in practice. However, the body of research is not yet large enough or well controlled enough to answer conclusively many of the questions about planning of end-of-life care.     

Physician reluctance to discuss advance directives. An empiric investigation of potential barriers

BACKGROUND: To determine the relative impact of five proposed barriers to physician usage of advance directives with the aim of increasing the number of advance directives generated. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 460 internal medicine resident and attending physicians at a large New York, NY, hospital. Of these, 277 (60%) responded. We used multiple regression to measure the impact of five barriers to physician-initiated discussions of advance directives (time constraints, compensation concerns, discomfort with the subject, beliefs about appropriateness, and lack of understanding) on respondents' estimates of the number of advance directives held by respondents' patients, the number of recent advance directive discussions, and the number of discussions initiated by physicians. RESULTS: Physician lack of understanding and erroneous beliefs about appropriateness had particularly strong effects, serving as barriers to recent advance directive discussions (P < .0001 and P < .0001, respectively) and total number of advance directives held (P < .0001 and P < .02). Physicians' lack of knowledge also served as a barrier to the percentage of discussions that were physician initiated (P < .003 and P < .04). Time constraints and lack of comfort affected only discussions that were physician initiated (P < .001). Compensation concerns did not appear to serve as a barrier. Respondents were supportive of the concept of advance directives but reported minimal use of them in appropriate situations. CONCLUSIONS: Attention can now be focused on methods to overcome the five barriers studied and thereby enhance the execution of advance directives.     

Relationships between insulin resistance and lipoproteins in nondiabetic African Americans, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic whites: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study

The study purpose was to explore the association between dyslipidemia and insulin resistance in three ethnic groups. The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) is a multicenter epidemiologic study conducted at four clinical centers in California, Texas, and Colorado. The study population for this analysis consisted of 931 non-Hispanic white, African American, and Hispanic men and women (aged 45 to 64 years) without diabetes. The IRAS clinical examinations included lipoprotein measures, a 75-g glucose tolerance test, and the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) test. The results show a consistent relationship between insulin-mediated glucose disposal and dyslipidemia in African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white men and women. Further, LDL size was inversely associated with insulin resistance in all three ethnic groups. These findings indicate that dyslipidemia is a fundamental part of the insulin resistance syndrome in all of the ethnic groups studied.     

Eliciting patient preferences in today's health care system.

The American Medical Association Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs recommends that physicians discuss advance directives with their patients and the patients' proxies. The council could have gone further by recognizing the difficulties physicians will encounter in trying to implement its proposal in a managed health care system. There is an undeniable need for caregiver participation in end-of-life planning, but the health care system must recognize and support implementation of the council's recommendations to make that possible. More explicit recognition of this fact on the part of the council would have helped physicians attempt to comply with its recommendations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Increasing the use of advance directives in medical outpatients

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether a simple educational intervention would increase patient completion of advance directives and discussions on end-of-life issues. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-seven outpatients of a primary care internal medicine clinic. INTERVENTION: Study subjects attended a 1-hour interactive seminar and received an informational pamphlet and advance directive forms. Control subjects received by mail the pamphlet and forms only. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Completion of the advance directive was the main measurement. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics of either group. Follow-up at 1 month revealed advance directive completion in 38% of study versus 24% of control subjects (p = .04), and discussions on advance planning in 73% of study versus 57% of control subjects (p = .02). Patients most likely to complete the documents were white, married, or attendees at the educational seminar. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive group seminars for medical outpatients increased discussions and use of written advance directives.     

Eyeball position in Graves orbitopathy and its significance for eyelid surgery

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to identify and compare the attitudes of patients and health care professionals towards advance directives. Advance directives promote recognition of the patient's autonomy, letting the individual exercise a certain measure of control over life-sustaining care and treatment in the eventuality of becoming incompetent. DESIGN: Attitudes to advance directives were evaluated using a 44-item self-reported questionnaire. It yields an overall score as well as five factor scores: autonomy, beneficence, justice, external norms, and the affective dimension. SETTING: Health care institutions in the province of Québec, Canada. Survey sample: The sampling consisted of 921 subjects: 123 patients, 167 physicians, 340 nurses and 291 administrators of health care institutions. RESULTS: Although the general attitude of each population was favourable to the expression of autonomy, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated that physicians attached less importance to this subscale than did other populations (p < .001). Above all, they favoured legal external norms and beneficence. Physicians and administrators also attached less importance to the affective dimension than did patients and nurses. Specifically, physicians' attitudes towards advance directives were shown to be less positive than patients' attitudes. CONCLUSION: More attention should be given to the importance of adequately informing patients about advance directives because they may not represent an adequate means for patients to assert their autonomy.     

Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient education and resident education strategies to promote advance directives in the outpatient setting, and to assess barriers to implementation. DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial. SETTING: The internal medicine residents' practice of an urban, university medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Medical residents and 250 patients seen at least twice in the 3 months prior to the study. INTERVENTIONS: We randomized practice days: one to patient education, one to resident education, and three controls. Resident education consisted of a lecture, a videotape of a model advance directives discussion, and videotaping of an actual discussion by each resident, followed by individual review. Patient education consisted of distributing pamphlets in the waiting room and offering all patients an opportunity to discuss advance directives. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We interviewed 187 of these patients (response rate 75%) and surveyed 62 residents (response rate 70%). After 18 months, there were no significant differences in the number of advance directives in charts among the three groups. Documented advance directives discussions with patients in the resident education group increased from 3% to 17% (p < .001), more than those in the patient education (5%) or control group (10%, p = .04). Residents in the resident education group were more likely to report discussing advance directives than those in the patient education or control groups (p = .05). Lack of time (95%) and lack of continuity (76%) were the most frequently cited barriers. In multivariate logistic regression, nonwhite race and non-U.S. birth were negatively associated with patient interest in advance directives. Patient race and birthplace were not associated with actual discussions of advance directives. CONCLUSIONS: Even with intensive efforts to educate outpatients and residents about advance directives, important barriers remain, raising questions about how best to promote advance directives among outpatients.     

Motor vehicle occupant deaths among Hispanic and black children and teenagers

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of motor vehicle occupant deaths per unit of travel for Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white children (aged 5-12 years) and teenagers (aged 13-19 years). DESIGN: Comparison of 1989 to 1993 motor vehicle occupant death rates of children and teenagers by race, ethnicity, and sex by using data on mortality from the National Center for Health Statistics, travel data from the 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, and 1990 US census data. RESULTS: Among children 5 to 12 years old, race/ ethnicity differences per 100000 persons were unremarkable, but per billion vehicle-miles of travel, the rates were 14 for non-Hispanic blacks, 8 for Hispanics, and 5 for non-Hispanic whites. Among teenagers aged 13 to 19, the rates per 100000 persons were highest for non-Hispanic whites; however, the rates per billion vehicle-miles were 45 for Hispanics, 34 for non-Hispanic blacks, and 30 for non-Hispanic whites. Black and Hispanic male teenagers had substantially higher death rates per billion vehicle-miles of travel than either white male teenagers or female teenagers in any racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Black and Hispanic children and teenagers are at higher risk of dying in motor vehicle crashes when they travel. Greater public health attention is needed to address these increased risks.     

Completing advance directives for health care decisions: Getting to yes.

The concept of advance directives for health care decision making has been judicially condoned, legislatively promoted, and systematically implemented by health care institutions, yet the execution rate of advance directives remains low. Physicians should discuss with their patients advance care planning generally and end-of-life issues specifically, preferably when patients are in good health and not when they face an acute medical crisis. The physician–hospital relationship poses particular challenges for the optimal implementation of advance directives that must be addressed. Hospital administrators must improve education of patients and physicians on the value of such documents as well as internal mechanisms to ensure better implementation of directives. Health insurance plans may be better able to ensure optimal gathering and implementation of directives. Patients must become more familiar and more comfortable with advance care planning and the reality of death and dying issues. Full acceptance of the value of directives ultimately rests on achieving full participation of all involved—providers, patients, families, and payors—in this most profound process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Obtaining a durable power of attorney for health care from nursing home residents

BACKGROUND: A durable power of attorney for health care (DPA) allows a person to appoint a surrogate decision-maker for any future period of mental incapacity. The absence of advance directives can lead to confusion and the expenditure of resources while trying to exert a substituted judgment. METHODS: The Wisconsin DPA was presented with an organized pilot program to 150 residents who had been judged by their social workers to have the capacity to make informed decisions regarding medical care. The reasons residents gave for accepting or rejecting a DPA were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent prepared a DPA. Reasons for signing included allowing the resident to decide who would make medical decisions and assuring that specific wishes would be carried out. Twenty-one percent did not execute a DPA. Reasons were categorized as confusion and misunderstanding regarding the legal system, mistrust, or social isolation. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate (79%) of DPA completion is probably related to individually counseling residents. However, competent residents who despite counseling do not choose to execute a DPA can have detailed advance directives ("living wills") prepared without appointing a decision-maker.     

The emerging Hispanic population: a foundation for cancer prevention and control

Although making up only 9% of the U.S. population and concentrated in urban areas of a few states, Hispanics are found throughout the country and represent a mix of historical and cultural backgrounds. This diverse group cuts across racial and ethnic lines, with origins in various countries of Europe and North, Central, and South America. The Hispanic population has several distinguishing demographic characteristics, including its rapid growth rate, relative youth, and low educational and socioeconomic levels. However, considerable differences exist among Hispanic groups, particularly in median age, household size, education, and family income. The majority of Hispanics face barriers to health care access, including a lack of health insurance coverage, underrepresentation in health care fields, and cultural and language differences. These distinct demographic characteristics and barriers have a direct impact on the risk of cancer in Hispanics and on the development of prevention and control strategies. The purpose of this review is to examine the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of Hispanics and issues of access to health care among this population within the context of cancer prevention and control.     

General practice of advance directives in the USA

Definition of the problem: Advance directives are written documents which tell what a person wants or does not want if he/she in the future cannot make his/her wishes known about medical treatment. There are three major forms of advance directives in the US: living will, durable power of attorney, and medical directive. Even though advance directives have been used for over 25 years, probably no more than 20% of Americans have prepared a written directive. What are the reasons for this relatively small percentage? It has been argued that they run the opposing risks of either being too general or too specific and that they often use a vague and confusing terminology. Furthermore, the two most frequently cited barriers were the patient's expectation that the physician should take the initiative and the sense that such issues were only relevant for those who were older or in worse health. Progress in developing useful advance directives cannot stop with existing documents. A critical evaluation of advance directives and the development of new ideas will be necessary. Therein, the most important area for future efforts is empirical research.     

Ethnicity and mental health treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders.

The authors examined the relationship between ethnicity and treatment utilization by individuals with personality disorders (PDs). Lifetime and prospectively determined rates and amounts of mental health treatments received were compared in over 500 White, African American, and Hispanic participants with PDs in a naturalistic longitudinal study. Minority, especially Hispanic, participants were significantly less likely than White participants to receive a range of outpatient and inpatient psychosocial treatments and psychotropic medications. This pattern was especially pronounced for minority participants with more severe PDs. A positive support alliance factor significantly predicted the amount of individual psychotherapy used by African American and Hispanic but not White participants, underscoring the importance of special attention to the treatment relationship with minority patients. These treatment use differences raise complex questions about treatment assessment and delivery, cultural biases of the current diagnostic system, and possible variation in PD manifestation across racial/ethnic groups. Future studies need to assess specific barriers to adequate and appropriate treatments for minority individuals with PDs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Use of advance directives: facilitating health care decisions by adults with mental retardation and their families

As increasing numbers of adults with mental retardation survive into adulthood and old age, they may face decisions about their health care and end-of-life treatment. Advance directives may serve as a tool for communicating one's preferences about future medical treatment. Information about the types, extent of use, and ethical context of advanced directives is provided and four critical issues regarding use of advanced directives by adults with mental retardation and their families are examined: assessment of decision-making capacity, standards for surrogate decision-making, family involvement in advanced directives planning, and constraints on the use of advanced directives. Implications for professionals are discussed, including ways to facilitate advance care planning.     

Panel II: Macrosocial and environmental influences on minority health.

Ethnic minority populations show patterns of health, health care use, and mortality that differ from the overall U.S. population. Each of the broad groups of minorities (Asian. Hispanic, Native, and African Americans) has a unique background of sociocultural factors that influence these patterns. Thus. the larger social environment for ethnic populations, including political, environmental, historical, and economic factors, is a major variable in possible health outcomes. The individual portions in this panel report of the conference seek to identify such factors for each ethnic group and to suggest those macrosocial influences that are most important for observed health effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Advance directives and advocacy in end-of-life decisions

This article examines the issue of advocacy for all adults in end-of-life decisions to help enhance the role of health care providers as partners in decision making. The ethical issues of death and dying are of particular concern for the elderly. Conflicts may prevent providers and nurses from creating a good dying experience for patients and family. Among the many issues associated with end-of-life decision making are futility, autonomy, and quality of life, a "good death," advance directives, family distress, and the culture of medicine. To overcome related barriers, involved health care providers can promote advocacy by offering choices in end-of-life care and providing an environment of listening and communication. Initiating and maintaining dialogue on this difficult subject will provide better care to patients and families.