A systematic approach for interpreting MR images of the seizure patient

A systematic approach needs to be used to review MR scans in epilepsy patients to avoid the common pitfalls engendered by the subtle nature of many epileptogenic lesions. One should always evaluate the hippocampus regardless of other MR findings to avoid missing dual abnormalities. False-positive and false-negative diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis can be avoided by evaluating the hippocampus after correcting for head rotation [by assessing the internal auditory canals and atria). Periventricular heterotopia can be successfully diagnosed by systematically studying the periventricular regions, especially those adjacent to the atria of the lateral ventricles. Gray matter lateral to the ventricles (excluding the caudate nucleus) is always an abnormal finding. Sulcal and cortical morphologic abnormalities are particularly difficult to diagnose unless a high index of suspicion is maintained. Cortical thickening is indicative of a developmental anomaly and should be screened in an organized manner. Because epilepsy is generally a cortical process, one must search for subtle cortical abnormalities, including focal atrophic abnormalities and lesions without mass effect. Diligence will offer its own rewards.     

Rationale for systematic reviews

Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets. Meta-analyses in particular can increase power and precision of estimates of treatment effects and exposure risks. Finally, explicit methods used in systematic reviews limit bias and, hopefully, will improve reliability and accuracy of conclusions.     

Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews

The final common pathway for most systematic reviews is a statistical summary of the data, or meta-analysis. The complex methods used in meta-analyses should always be complemented by clinical acumen and common sense in designing the protocol of a systematic review, deciding which data can be combined, and determining whether data should be combined. Both continuous and binary data can be pooled. Most meta-analyses summarize data from randomized trials, but other applications, such as the evaluation of diagnostic test performance and observational studies, have also been developed. The statistical methods of meta-analysis aim at evaluating the diversity (heterogeneity) among the results of different studies, exploring and explaining observed heterogeneity, and estimating a common pooled effect with increased precision. Fixed-effects models assume that an intervention has a single true effect, whereas random-effects models assume that an effect may vary across studies. Meta-regression analyses, by using each study rather than each patient as a unit of observation, can help to evaluate the effect of individual variables on the magnitude of an observed effect and thus may sometimes explain why study results differ. It is also important to assess the robustness of conclusions through sensitivity analyses and a formal evaluation of potential sources of bias, including publication bias and the effect of the quality of the studies on the observed effect.     

Applying the results of trials and systematic reviews to individual patients

Your patient is a 60-year-old hypertensive, alcoholic woman whose symptomless atrial fibrillation was first documented 3 months ago. An echocardiogram shows an enlarged left atrium, rendering successful cardioversion unlikely. She tells you that both of her parents had severe strokes that made the last years of their lives horrible, and she is terrified of having a stroke. You know that a meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials of warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation demonstrated a 68% relative risk reduction (RRR) in stroke (1). You consider prescribing warfarin for this patient but know that she would not have qualified for the study because alcoholism increases her risk for major hemorrhage (2).     

A guide to strategic planning

Strategic planning is a new concept in general practice. Underneath all the jargon, however, it is simply a label for the planning and evaluation processes that most organisations have used in the past. The aim of this paper is to demystify strategic planning as it applies to newly formed Divisions of General Practice.     

A guide to RGP lens solutions

Laser resurfacing has become a commonly used technique for the treatment of a variety of skin conditions including facial actinic damage, rhytides, and acne scarring. Although the procedure has the ability to deliver consistently good results with an excellent safety profile, complications do occur even in the best of hands. Independent of the type of laser used or the surgical technique, the risk of complications and the final outcome can be greatly influenced by the care of the skin before and after the procedure. This article will focus on the preoperative assessment of the patient, the concept of preconditioning the skin, and postoperative wound management after laser resurfacing. Various occlusive dressing products will be discussed, as well as their role in wound healing. A pre- and posttreatment skin care regimen will be provided to use as a guide in the management of patients undergoing laser resurfacing.     

A guide to understanding informed consent

Anesthesia providers are expected to provide information to the patient during the preanesthesia interview that enables the patient to make informed choices. Adequate disclosure during the informed consent process ensures the equalization of the practitioner/patient relationship and the decision-making rights of the patient. Both certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and anesthesiologists are not only legally required to provide information that will allow a patient to make an informed judgment about how to proceed with various anesthetic modalities but are also obligated by their standards of practice. This article informs the CRNA about the principles of informed consent so that they can better understand their role in the informed consent process.     

A guide to salivary gland disorders

This article discusses salivary gland disorders and provides nurses with a broad base of knowledge for use in planning and implementing perioperative patient care. Salivary gland disorders may be caused by nonneoplastic conditions or neoplasms. Nonneoplastic conditions generally are related to inflammatory processes or are secondary to existing disease processes. Neoplasms manifest themselves as benign or malignant tumors of the salivary glands. Patients with nonneoplastic conditions may undergo surgical procedures for health problems unrelated to their salivary gland disorders; however, patients with salivary gland neoplasms usually undergo surgical excisions of their tumors and affected glands. Patients in both categories require skilled perioperative nursing care.     

A practitioner''s guide to HIV testing

So far Could it be HIV? has examined many of the clues obtained from the clinical history and physical examination that might make an alert health care worker consider the diagnosis of HIV infection. Here we examine strategies for seeking permission for HIV testing and give advice on interpreting the results.     

A guide to common parasitic diseases

The authors propose a highly effective method for isolation of lactoferrin from female colostrum. Lactoferrin is measured by the sandwich enzyme immunoassay. Its concentrations in the serum, urine, amniotic and cerebrospinal fluid in health are measured. The advantages of the method for lactoferrin purification and the practical significance of this protein are discussed.     

A guide to constructs of control.

An integrative framework, designed to organize the heterogeneous constructs related to "control," is based on 2 fundamental distinctions: (a) objective, subjective, and experiences of control; and (b) agents, means, and ends of control. The framework is used to analyze more than 100 terms, such as sense of control, proxy control, and primary control. It is argued that although many terms reflect aspects of perceived control (both distinct and overlapping), some are more usefully considered aspects of objective control conditions (e.g., contingency), potential antecedents of perceived control (e.g., choice), potential consequences (e.g., secondary control), sources of motivation for control (e.g., mastery), or other sources of motivation (e.g., autonomy). Implications for theory, measurement, research, and intervention are explored. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Nicotine and familial vulnerability to schizophrenia: A discordant twin study.

Tobacco use is significantly associated with schizophrenia. However, it is not clear if smoking is associated with the illness itself, treatment, or underlying vulnerability to the disease. Smoking was studied in a sample of schizophrenic probands (n = 24), their unaffected co-twins (n = 24), and controls (n = 3,347). Unaffected co-twins had higher rates of daily smoking than controls. Probands and co-twins were more frequently unsuccessful in attempts to quit than controls. Probands reported shaky hands and depression following smoking cessation more often than controls, whereas unaffected co-twins reported difficulty concentrating, drowsiness, nervousness, and headache following smoking cessation more often than controls. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that nicotine use is influenced by familial vulnerability to schizophrenia, not just clinical schizophrenia per se. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric units

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational visit to help obstetricians and midwives select and use evidence from a Cochrane database containing 600 systematic reviews. DESIGN: Randomised single blind controlled trial with obstetric units allocated to an educational visit or control group. SETTING: 25 of the 26 district general obstetric units in two former NHS regions. SUBJECTS: The senior obstetrician and midwife from each intervention unit participated in educational visits. Clinical practices of all staff were assessed in 4508 pregnancies. INTERVENTION: Single informal educational visit by a respected obstetrician including discussion of evidence based obstetrics, guidance on implementation, and donation of Cochrane database and other materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of perineal suturing with polyglycolic acid, ventouse delivery, prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section, and steroids in preterm delivery, before and 9 months after visits, and concordance of guidelines with review evidence for same marker practices before and after visits. RESULTS: Rates varied greatly, but the overall baseline mean of 43% (986/2312) increased to 54% (1189/2196) 9 months later. Rates of ventouse delivery increased significantly in intervention units but not in control units; there was no difference between the two types of units in uptake of other practices. Pooling rates from all 25 units, use of antibiotics in caesarean section and use of polyglycolic acid sutures increased significantly over the period, but use of steroids in preterm delivery was unchanged. Labour ward guidelines seldom agreed with evidence at baseline; this hardly improved after visits. Educational visits cost pound860 each (at 1995 prices). CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable uptake of evidence into practice in both control and intervention units between 1994 and 1995. Our educational visits added little to this, despite the informal setting, targeting of senior staff from two disciplines, and donation of educational materials. Further work is needed to define cost effective methods to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and to clarify leadership and roles of senior obstetric staff in implementing the evidence.     

A practical guide to topical therapy in children

OBJECTIVE: To determine the duration of time to the recurrence of pain attributable to endometriosis after the discontinuation of treatment with danazol or a GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) in patients who have had a satisfactory response to the treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Nine academic medical centers in three countries. PATIENT(S): Three hundred twenty-seven women with diagnosed and staged endometriosis who were treated with at least 6 months of danazol or a GnRH-a and who experienced significant pain relief with therapy. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Duration of pain relief after completion of treatment as determined by a patient-initiated report of pain recurrence or increase in pain severity requiring intervention. RESULT(S): The median time to the recurrence of pain was 6.1 months for patients treated with danazol and 5.2 months for patients treated with a GnRH-a. CONCLUSION(S): Although there was a lack of uniformity in treatment effects across sites, the analyses have taken into account major covariant effects. The time to the recurrence of endometriosis-associated pain after danazol treatment was slightly longer than that after GnRH-a treatment.     

A reader's guide to the evaluation of causation

In this article, we review the criteria used to establish a causal association. A literature search strategy will be outlined. We present a clinical scenario that was formulated to examine the evidence for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a possible cause of gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. Several of the studies identified in the literature search were critically appraised and the criteria needed to confirm a causal link were then applied. These guidelines may be employed to not only demonstrate the aetiology of a disease but have wider applicability in terms of determining whether a medication may be causing certain adverse events.