The receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator is present in plasma from healthy donors and elevated in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria

The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a proteolytic enzyme which converts the proenzyme plasminogen to the active serine protease plasmin. A cell surface receptor for uPA (uPAR) is attached to the cell membrane by a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchor. Binding of uPA to uPAR leads to an enhanced plasmin formation and thereby an amplification of pericellular proteolysis. We have shown previously that uPAR is expressed on normal blood monocytes and granulocytes, but is deficient on affected blood monocytes and granulocytes in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), and that uPAR is present in plasma from these patients. In this study a newly established sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been applied for quantitation of uPAR in plasma. Unexpectedly, we found that uPAR is not only present in PNH plasma but also in plasma from healthy individuals. In 39 healthy individuals the mean plasma-uPAR value +/- SD was 31 +/- 15 pM, median 28 (range 11-108), and the corresponding value for six PNH patients was 116 +/- 67 pM, median 90 (range 61-228). The elevated uPAR-level in PNH patients was highly significant (Mann-Whitney test; P < 0.0001), and may possibly contribute to the propensity for thrombosis in PNH by inhibition of the fibrinolytic system. Binding of pro-uPA by uPAR in plasma may interfere with the appropriate binding of pro-uPA to cell-bound uPAR and therefore inhibit cell-associated plasmin generation and fibrinolysis. It is likely that the uPAR in normal plasma reflects the overall level of activity of the uPAR-mediated cell surface proteolysis. The present ELISA may be used for studies of uPAR levels in plasma from patients with conditions in which this activity might be increased, such as cancer and inflammatory disorders. Future studies will determine if uPAR in plasma is a parameter of clinical importance in these diseases.     

A competitive chromogenic assay to study the functional interaction of urokinase-type plasminogen activator with its receptor

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) converts plasminogen to plasmin which degrades various extracellular matrix components. uPA is focused to the cell surface via binding to a specific receptor (uPAR, also termed CD87). uPAR-bound uPA mediates pericellular proteolysis in a variety of biological processes, e.g. cell migration, tissue remodeling and tumor invasion. We have developed a competitive microtiter plate-based chromogenic assay which allows the analysis of uPA/uPAR interaction. The plates are coated with recombinant uPAR expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Proteolytically active uPA (HMW-uPA) is added to the microtiter plate-attached uPAR. The amount of receptor-bound uPA is then determined indirectly via addition of plasminogen, which is activated to plasmin, followed by cleavage of a plasmin-specific chromogenic substrate. Substances interfering with binding of HMW-uPA to uPAR diminish the generation of plasmin, as indicated by a reduction of cleaved chromogenic substrate. This assay was used to analyze the inhibitory capacity of a variety of proteins and peptides, respectively, on the uPA/uPAR interaction: i) uPAR and uPAR-variants expressed in CHO cells, yeast or E. coli, ii) the aminoterminal fragment (ATF) of human uPA or yeast recombinant pro-uPA, iii) synthetic peptides derived from the sequence of the uPAR-binding region of uPA, and iv) antibodies directed against uPAR. This assay may be helpful in identifying uPA and uPAR analogues or antagonists which efficiently block uPA/uPAR interaction.     

Potentiation of plasminogen activation by an anti-urokinase monoclonal antibody due to ternary complex formation. A mechanistic model for receptor-mediated plasminogen activation

We have observed that a murine IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against human urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) greatly potentiates pro-uPA-mediated plasminogen activation. This effect was dependent on the interaction between the immunoglobulin and the kringle domain of pro-uPA and could be competed efficiently by kringle-containing proteolytic fragments of uPA. In addition, the potentiation could also be competed by the lysine analog 6-aminohexanoic acid, an antagonist of plasminogen binding. This unexpected plasminogen binding dependence was found to be due to a carboxyl-terminal lysine residue on the immunoglobulin gamma chain, which by analogy with other proteins represents a potential binding site for plasminogen. Removal of this residue with carboxypeptidase B resulted in a complete abolition of the potentiation. It appears therefore that the potentiatory effect involves a novel mechanism with the antibody acting to provide a specific template for the assembly of a ternary complex involving pro-uPA/uPA and plasminogen, enabling them to interact in a catalytically favorable manner. This interpretation was confirmed by studying the kinetics of plasminogen activation by the complex between active, two-chain uPA and the antibody, which resulted in an overall 50-fold increase in reaction efficiency (kcat/Km), primarily due to a reduction in Km from 20 to 0.1 microM. Pro-uPA activation by plasmin was also accelerated, although to a lesser extent. The potentiation due to complex formation also provides a mechanism for the initiation of this system, dependent only on the low intrinsic proteolytic activity of the zymogen forms. The effects observed here, mediated by ternary complex formation, simulate the effects we have previously observed on assembly of the uPA receptor-mediated cellular plasminogen activation system and may therefore represent a mechanistic model for both its activity and initiation.     

Plasminogen activation by pro-urokinase in complex with its receptor--dependence on a tripeptide (Spectrozyme plasmin)

The intrinsic activity of single-chain pro-urinary-type plasminogen activator (pro-uPA) and whether its receptor (uPAR) potentiates this activity remains controversial. In this report, the pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex in solution is shown to have equivalent plasminogen-activator activity to that of active two-chain uPA (tc-uPA). However, the activity of the complex was dependent on a synthetic tripeptide, Spectrozyme plasmin (Spl, H-D-2-aminohexanoic acid(Ahx)-hexatyrosyl-lysine-p-nitroanilide), which can also be used as a chromogenic substrate for plasmin. Furthermore, this activity could be completely suppressed by commonly used carrier proteins and detergents. The pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex at 1 nM displayed similar activity to that of tc-uPA for either [Glu1]plasminogen or [Lys77]plasminogen in chromogenic assays with Spl present as the plasmin substrate. When assayed with another plasmin substrate, S2251, the pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex was unable to activate plasminogen. The pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex and tc-uPA also showed a similar extent of plasminogen activation as measured by SDS/PAGE, when incubated with plasminogen and Spl in the presence of 100 micro M aprotinin, and plasminogen activation by pro-uPA alone was also stimulated in the presence of Spl in this assay. Activation of plasminogen by the pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide strictly required the presence of Spl, and pro-uPA remained in single-chain form during these assays. This activity of the pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex but not that of tc-uPA was completely inhibited by human serum albumin, bovine serum albumin, Tween-80, Triton X-100, and Pluronic-F68. Taken together, the data indicates that uPAR-(1-281)-peptide itself is not sufficient to augment pro-uPA activity and the presence of an effector molecule (e.g. Spl) is required to elicit the full plasminogen-activator activity of the pro-uPA/uPAR-(1-281)-peptide complex. It remains to be seen whether there is a physiological counterpart to this phenomenon.     

Increased cell-surface urokinase in advanced ovarian cancer

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), uPA receptors, and cathepsin B were quantitated by using an immunological method, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and amidolytic activity assays in 15 malignant and 10 benign epithelial ovarian tumors. The levels of uPA and uPA receptors, as well as cathepsin B, were found to be higher in membrane preparations obtained from malignant tumors than in those obtained from benign tumors. Acid-treated membranes acquired the ability to bind uPA, indicating that uPA is bound to a specific surface receptor that is not completely saturated. Levels of single-chain uPA (pro-uPA) and high-molecular-weight uPA in membrane preparations were measured by immunoadsorbent-amidolytic assay. The finding of a significant increase in amidolytic activity following activation of uPAs by plasmin suggested that less than half (30-40%) of all membrane immunoreactive uPAs is present in the enzymatically inactive pro-uPA form. In the membranes of malignant tumors, levels of uPA receptor and cathepsin B did not vary with stage of disease. On the other hand, we found that the level of receptor-bound uPA antigen/activity was significantly increased in advanced malignant tumors. Receptor-bound uPA may play an important role in determining invasive potential of tumor cells. Since ovarian cancer cells produce both pro-uPA and cathepsin B, the possibility of activation of tumor cell-derived pro-uPA by cellular protease cathepsin B must be considered.     

Requirement of receptor-bound urokinase-type plasminogen activator for integrin alphavbeta5-directed cell migration

The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) interacts with its cell surface receptor (uPAR), providing an inducible, localized cell surface proteolytic activity, thereby promoting cellular invasion. Evidence is provided for a novel function of cell surface-associated uPA.uPAR. Specifically, induction of cell surface expression of uPA. uPAR by growth factors or phorbol ester was necessary for vitronectin-dependent carcinoma cell migration, an event mediated by integrin alphavbeta5. Cell migration on vitronectin was blocked with either a soluble form of uPAR, an antibody that disrupts uPA binding to uPAR, or a monoclonal antibody to alphavbeta5. Moreover, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 blocked this migration event but did not affect adhesion, suggesting a direct role for uPA enzyme activity in this process and that migration but not adhesion of these cells is regulated by uPA.uPAR. Growth factor-mediated induction of uPA.uPAR on the carcinoma cell surface promotes a specific motility event mediated by integrin alphavbeta5, since cells transfected with the beta3 integrin subunit expressed alphavbeta3 and migrated on vitronectin independently of growth factors or uPA.uPAR expression. This relationship between alphavbeta5 and the uPA.uPAR system has significant implications for regulation of motility events associated with development, angiogenesis, and tumor metastasis.     

Urokinase receptor-dependent upregulation of smooth muscle cell adhesion to vitronectin by urokinase

The plasminogen activator system has been implicated in the modulation of the response to vascular injury. Although urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) may enhance matrix degradation as well as migration and invasion by smooth muscle cells (SMCs), their roles in cell adhesion are uncertain. Therefore, we examined the ability of uPA and uPAR to modulate adhesion of cultured human vascular SMCs to various matrices. We demonstrated a dose-dependent stimulation of adhesion by single-chain uPA (scuPA) to vitronectin (maximum 1.55-fold [+/-0. 04-fold] increase, 10 nmol/L, P<0.002) but not to laminin, collagen I, or collagen IV. Baseline adhesion to vitronectin was completely inhibited by both EDTA and RGD peptide but was restored to >40% of control in the presence of scuPA (P=0.001 and 0.046, respectively). Adhesion to vitronectin was also significantly enhanced by the amino-terminal fragment of uPA (P=0.007) and two-chain, high-molecular-weight uPA (P<0.01) but not by the low-molecular-weight fragment of uPA, which lacks the receptor-binding domain. Aprotinin, a plasmin inhibitor, had no effect on baseline or scuPA-stimulated adhesion, suggesting a plasmin-independent process. Preincubation of scuPA with soluble uPAR inhibited scuPA stimulation of adhesion by 88+/-14% (P=0.01), as did pretreatment of SMCs with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, which removes glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, including uPAR. Antibodies to both alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrin inhibited baseline adhesion but not scuPA stimulation. Finally, coating plates with scuPA alone enabled cell adhesion, which could be inhibited by both soluble uPAR and anti-uPAR antibodies. These data suggest that uPA stimulates adhesion of SMCs specifically to vitronectin and that it is mediated by an interaction with uPAR. Upregulation of both proteins after vascular injury may facilitate migration through stimulation of both matrix degradation and cell adhesion.     

Plasminogen activator system modulates invasive capacity and proliferation in prostatic tumor cells

The malignant phenotype of prostatic tumor cells correlates with the expression of both uPA and its cell-membrane receptor (uPAR); however, there is little information concerning the role of cell-bound uPA in matrix degradation and invasion. Our results suggest that cell-associated uPA plays a key role in regulating the amount of plasmin present at the surface of prostatic carcinoma (PRCA) cells and show that differential production of uPA corresponds with the capacity to bind and activate plasminogen. In addition, we provide direct evidence that both uPA secretion and the presence of uPA-uPAR complexes characterize the invasive phenotype of PRCA cells and suggest the existence of several pathways by which tumor cells acquire plasmin activity. LNCaP cells (which do not produce uPA but express uPAR) may activate plasmin through exogenous uPA. In vivo, the source of uPA may be infiltrating macrophages and/or fibroblasts as observed in several other systems. PAI-1 accumulation in the conditioned medium (CM) limits plasmin action to the pericellular microenvironment. Our results indicate that MMP-9 and MMP-2 are also activated by plasmin generated by cell-bound but not by soluble, extracellular uPA. Plasmin activation and triggering of the proteolytic cascade involved in Matrigel invasion is blocked by antibodies against uPA (especially by anti- A-chain of uPA which interacts with uPAR) and by PA inhibitors such as p-aminobenzamidine which may regulate levels of cell-bound uPA. uPA may also regulate growth in PRCA cells. Indeed, antibodies against uPA A-chain (and also p-aminobenzamidine treatment) interfere with the ATF domain and inhibit cell growth in uPA-producing PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines, whereas exogenous uPA (HMW-uPA with ATF) induces growth of LNCaP prostate tumor cell line. These data support the hypothesis that in prostatic cancer patients at risk of progression, uPA/plasmin blockade may be of therapeutic value by blocking both growth of the primary tumor and dissemination of metastatic cells.     

Activation of the serine proteinase system in chronic kidney rejection

BACKGROUND: Activation of the serine proteinase system is an important mechanism that contributes to tissue remodeling. In the present study, we analyzed the expression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) in samples of chronically rejected human kidneys. METHODS: Using Northern blot analysis, immunohistochemistry, and a uPA activity assay, specimens from 10 chronically rejected kidneys and 10 normal kidney samples were analyzed. RESULTS: By Northern blot analysis, the expression of uPAR and PAI-1 mRNA was 2.9-fold (P<0.05) and 2.3-fold (P<0.05) increased in chronically rejected kidney samples, respectively, compared with normal controls. In contrast, uPA mRNA levels in chronically rejected kidneys were comparable to those in the normal controls. Immunohistochemical analysis in normal kidneys showed weak immunostaining of uPA, moderate to intense uPAR and PAI-1 immunostaining in proximal tubules, and moderate immunostaining in distal tubules, but no signal in the glomeruli or cortical vessels. A similar staining pattern was found in the distal and proximal tubules in rejected kidney tissue samples. However, in the rejected kidneys, the number of tubules was markedly reduced. In addition, within the glomeruli of rejected kidney samples, there was positive immunostaining for uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in the mesangial cells, but negative staining in most of the endothelial cells, whereas the normal kidneys revealed no immunoreactivity in these structures. CONCLUSION: The demonstrated up-regulation of uPA/uPAR/PAI-1 in chronic renal rejection is consistent with the plasminogen/plasmin system contributing to tissue remodeling in this disorder. These factors might activate latent transforming growth factor-betas, which have been reported to be enhanced in this disorder, contributing to the generation of the extracellular matrix.     

Photoaffinity labeling of the human receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator using a decapeptide antagonist. Evidence for a composite ligand-binding site and a short interdomain separation

Binding of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to its cellular receptor (uPAR) renders the cell surface a favored site for plasminogen activation. Recently, a 15-mer peptide antagonist of the uPA-uPAR interaction, with an IC50 value of 10 nM, was identified using phage display technology [Goodson, R. J., Doyle, M. V., Kaufman, S. E., and Rosenberg, S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91, 7129-7133]. In the present study, the molecular aspects of the interaction between this peptide and uPAR have been investigated. We have characterized the real-time receptor binding kinetics for the antagonist using surface plasmon resonance and identified critical residues by alanine replacements. The minimal peptide antagonist thus derived (SLNFSQYLWS) was rendered photoactivatable by replacing residues important for uPAR binding with photochemically active derivatives of phenylalanine containing either (trifluoromethyl)diazirine or benzophenone. These peptides incorporated covalently into purified soluble uPAR upon photoactivation, and this was inhibited by preincubation with receptor binding derivatives of uPA. The intact three-domain structure of uPAR was essential for efficient photoaffinity labeling. Proteolytic domain mapping using chymotrypsin revealed a specific labeling of both uPAR domain I and domains II + III dependent on the position of the photoprobe in the antagonist. On the basis of these studies, we propose the existence of a composite ligand binding site in uPAR combined of residues located in distinct structural domains. According to this model, a close spatial proximity between uPAR domain I and either domains II or III in intact uPAR is required for the assembly of this composite binding site. Since the receptor binding properties of the peptide antagonist closely mimic those of uPA itself, these two ligands presumably share coincident binding site in uPAR.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces rapid prourokinase (pro-uPA) activation on the surface of endothelial cells

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the pivotal angiogenic growth factor activating endothelial cells to migrate, proliferate, and form capillary tubes. For an ordered endothelial cell migration, tissue invasion, and degradation of the extracellular matrix, proteolytic machinery is indispensable. Such machinery, suitable for localized proteolysis, is provided by the prourokinase-urokinase-plasmin system. Prourokinase (pro-uPA), the initial component of this system, is, however, synthesized in its inactive precursor form and as such bound to its cellular receptor uPAR. Here we identify a mechanism via which VEGF(165) interacting with its receptor VEGFR-2 rapidly induces prourokinase activation that is dependent on a change in integrin affinity, activation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2), and pro-uPA being bound to its surface receptor uPAR. This VEGF-induced pro-uPA activation on endothelial cells is responsible for VEGF-dependent local fibrinolytic activity and might be one of the initial steps in the angiogenic process.     

Regulation and role of urokinase plasminogen activator in vascular remodelling

1. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is produced and secreted by multiple vascular cell types, thus influencing the processes and the extent to which the vasculature is remodelled during the development of the intima or a neointima and during hypertrophy and angiogenesis. 2. Urokinase plasminogen activator mRNA expression is up- and down-regulated by growth factors, cytokines and steroids. Urokinase plasminogen activator is secreted as a single chain inactive form that may be proteolytically converted to active or inactive forms. Targeting of proteolytic activity may occur via focalized expression of uPA and its cell surface receptors (uPAR). Proteolytic activity is also controlled through the often co-ordinated expression of specific inhibitors. 3. A proteolytic cascade involving uPA provides its major role in tissue remodelling through the primary degradation of extracellular matrix and secondarily through the activation of transforming growth factor-beta or release from the matrix of basic fibroblast growth factor. In addition, uPA secreted by growth factor-stimulated vascular cells may contribute to the chemotactic and mitogenic responses ascribed to the growth factor and recent evidence strongly suggests that uPA has direct biological actions on vascular cells. 4. The cell surface binding of uPA via its growth factor-like domain to uPAR localizes and activates the protease, but may also initiate transmembrane signalling of biological responses, including migration/invasion and proliferation. As the uPAR lacks intracellular signalling domains, the signals may be transduced via interactions between uPA/uPAR and more classical signalling receptors. The mechanism by which uPA may be involved in cell signalling is yet to be elucidated.     

Immunohistochemical identification of the receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator associated with fibrin deposition in normal and ectopic human placenta

The receptor for urokinase plasminogen activator (uPAR) is a key molecule in cell surface-directed plasminogen activation. uPAR binds urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and thereby focuses plasminogen activation on the cell surface. Plasmin dissolves fibrin deposits and facilitates cell migration during tissue repair processes by degrading the extracellular matrix. During human implantation and placental development, plasmin is considered important for both trophoblast migration/invasion and for fibrin surveillance. This study examined the expression of uPAR in normal and ectopic human placentae by immunohistochemistry. In first and third trimester normal placentae as well as in tubal ectopic placental tissues, a high uPAR expression was seen in the trophoblast associated with deposits of fibrin-type fibrinoid. Extravillous trophoblast of the basal plate, of the cell islands, and of the cell columns was also positive for uPAR in the first trimester whereas at term the expression of the protein was decreased. Moreover, uPAR immunostaining was observed in decidual cells throughout normal gestation and in endometrial tissues of patients with ectopic pregnancies. These findings suggest that uPAR participates in placental development and in trophoblast invasion particularly in the first trimester of pregnancy and that uPAR is involved in repair mechanisms of the trophoblast and fibrin surveillance.     

Enhanced urokinase plasminogen activation in chronic pancreatitis suggests a role in its pathogenesis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) regulates plasmin generation from plasminogen. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of the plasminogen activator/plasmin system in chronic pancreatitis (CP). METHODS: Using Northern blot analysis, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry, the expression of uPA, its receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) was studied in 14 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for CP. Normal control pancreatic tissue was obtained through an organ donor program. RESULTS: Eight of 14 CP samples showed concomitant increased expression (P < 0.001) of uPA (5.2-fold), uPAR (5.9-fold), and TGF-beta 1 (8.8-fold) messenger RNA (mRNA) compared with normal controls. PAI-1 mRNA expression was increased (6.5-fold; P < 0.001) in all CP samples. By in situ hybridization, moderate to strong mRNA staining of all four factors was present in acinar cells, some ductal cells, and areas with ductal metaplasia in CP samples. A similar staining pattern was found by immunohistochemistry. Intense mRNA and immunostaining for all of these factors in CP samples was associated with a higher degree of pancreatic damage. CONCLUSIONS: uPA and its receptor may contribute to the lytic damage observed in CP by plasmin generation. Similarly, increased amounts of plasmin may activate latent TGF-beta, thereby leading to the accumulation of fibrotic tissue.     

In vitro regulation of pericellular proteolysis in prostatic tumor cells treated with bombesin

Bombesin is a potent inducer of signal trasduction pathways involved in the proliferation and invasion of androgen-insensitive prostatic tumor cells. This study examines the bombesin-mediated modulation of pericellular proteolysis, monitoring cell capability to migrate and invade basement membranes, using a chemo-invasion assay and analyzing protease production. The results suggest that bombesin could modulate the invasive potential of prostatic cell lines regulating secretion and cell-surface uptake of uPA and MMP-9 activation. In fact, in PC3 and DU145 cells but not in LNCaP cells, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are induced by bombesin treatment. Bombesin also stimulates cell proliferation and this effect can be inhibited blocking uPA by antibodies and/or uPA inhibitor p-aminobenzamidine. Moreover, HMW-uPA induces cell proliferation in LNCaP cells, which do not produce uPA in the basal conditions, while PC3 and DU145 cell growth is supported by autocrine production of uPA. The increment of uPA activity on the external plasma membrane causes an increased pericellular plasmin activation. This effect is inhibited by antibodies against uPA and by p-aminobenzamidine. Similarly to EGF, bombesin stimulates secretion and activation of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 production. MMP-9 activation can be also obtained by HMW-uPA treatment, suggesting that plasma-membrane-bound uPA can start a proteolytic cascade involving MMP-9. Therefore, in in vitro assays, bombesin is able to modulate pericellular proteolysis and cell proliferation, differently distributing and activating proteolytic activities. This effect can be related to the "non-random" degradation of the extracellular matrix in which membrane uPA-uPAreceptor complexes could start bombesin-induced directional protein degradation during metastatic spread.     

Guidance of circumferentially growing axons by netrin-dependent and -independent floor plate chemotropism in the vertebrate brain

BACKGROUND: A strong positive correlation exists between the breast cancer tissue content of either urokinase-plasminogen activator (uPA) or plasminogen activator, inhibitor type I (PAI-1), quantified in the tissue extracts by immunoassays, and the survival of patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, several studies assign to the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) a pivotal role in triggering the proteolytic activity of the urokinase pathway involved in tumor stroma degradation, tumor spread and metastasis. However, the pattern of distribution of uPAR in normal and cancerous human tissue and the pattern of coexpression of activators and inhibitors that occurs in breast cancer tissues is not completely known. METHODS: The immunohistochemical localization of uPAR, uPA, tPA) and PAI-1 was evaluated by using the avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase technique and affinity-purified monoclonal antibodies from American Diagnostica Inc. Studies were performed in formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue prepared from 23 surgically excised non-neoplastic breast tissues and 18 ductal breast carcinomas. RESULTS: While the expression of uPAR protein represents a constant feature of invasive ductal breast cancer, it was also observed in most of the breast tissue samples, including the normal breast tissues. The staining for uPAR was mainly localized on normal or tumoral epithelial cells, even if the co-expression of uPAR in stromal cells was frequently observed in adjacent slides. A semiquantitative analysis of immunohistochemical results showed that uPAR and PAI-1 were overexpressed in invasive breast cancer in comparison with normal and benign breast tissues. In addition, uPA was higher in both invasive breast carcinomas and benign breast lesions with respect to normal breast tissues. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that overexpression of uPAR, uPA, and its main inhibitor, PAI-1, is a constant feature of invasive ductal breast carcinomas. However, the expression of the above fibrinolytic reactants is not specific for breast cancer since positive staining for these molecules was frequently observed in benign breast lesions as well as in normal breast tissues. The combined increased expression of uPA and its cellular receptor, uPAR on the surface of tumor epithelial cells may account for the activation of the proteolytic system which occurs in breast cancer.     

The factor structure of the Anorexia Nervosa Inventory for Self-Rating in a population-based sample and derivation of a shortened form

Blood loss during and after open-heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is largely caused by platelet dysfunction. Previous studies indicate that plasmin can induce platelet dysfunction and affect primary hemostasis by proteolytic degradation and/or redistribution of essential platelet membrane glycoprotein complexes such as the glycoprotein Ib/IX complex. In this study, we present a model for plasmin generation localized on the platelet surface. Platelets treated with soluble fibrin or platelets in a mixture with soluble fibrin, t-PA, and plasminogen caused a significantly increased plasmin generation (p<0.01), dependent on t-PA, soluble fibrin, and platelet concentration. The plasmin generation resulted in a downregulation of platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib/IX glycoprotein complexes. Finally, we demonstrated that inhibitors of fibrinolysis, such as %2-antiplasmin, tranexamic acid, and aprotinin, can inhibit plasmin activity in the fluid phase. The downregulation of platelet glycoprotein Ib/IX complexes, however, was only prevented by aprotinin and not by alpha2-antiplasmin and tranexamic acid. These in vitro observations suggest a platelet localized activation of plasminogen, dependent on t-PA, enhanced by the presence of soluble fibrin. Since high concentrations of soluble fibrin and elevated levels of t-PA during CPB are observed, plasmin activity on the platelet surface during this period is anticipated. This plasmin activity reduces platelet metabolic functions and can be directed towards membrane glycoproteins such as glycoprotein Ib/IX complexes, thereby affecting hemostasis during and after CPB.     

A urokinase-sensitive region of the human urokinase receptor is responsible for its chemotactic activity

The role of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR/CD87) in cell migration and invasion is well substantiated. Recently, uPA has been shown to be essential in cell migration, since uPA-/- mice are greatly impaired in inflammatory cell recruitment. We have shown previously that the uPA-induced chemotaxis requires interaction with and modification of uPAR/CD87, which is the true chemoattracting molecule acting through an unidentified cell surface component which mediates this cell surface chemokine activity. By expressing and testing several uPAR/CD87 variants, we have located and functionally characterized a potent uPAR/CD87 epitope that mimics the effects of the uPA-uPAR interaction. The chemotactic activity lies in the region linking domains 1 and 2, the only protease-sensitive region of uPAR/CD87, efficiently cleaved by uPA at physiological concentrations. Synthetic peptides carrying this epitope promote chemotaxis and activate p56/p59(hck) tyrosine kinase. Both chemotaxis and kinase activation are pertussis toxin sensitive, involving a Gi/o protein in the pathway.     

Plasminogen activation in synovial tissues: differences between normal, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis joints

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the functional activity of the plasminogen activators urokinase (uPA) and tissue type plasminogen activator (tPA) in human synovial membrane, and to compare the pattern of expression between normal, osteoarthritic, and rheumatoid synovium. The molecular mechanisms underlying differences in PA activities between normal and pathological synovial tissues have been further examined. METHODS: Synovial membranes from seven normal (N) subjects, 14 osteoarthritis (OA), and 10 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were analysed for plasminogen activator activity by conventional zymography and in situ zymography on tissue sections. The tissue distribution of uPA, tPA, uPA receptor (uPAR), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) was studied by immunohistochemistry. uPA, tPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 mRNA values and mRNA distribution were assessed by northern blot and in situ hybridisations respectively. RESULTS: All normal and most OA synovial tissues expressed predominantly tPA catalysed proteolytic activity mainly associated to the synovial vasculature. In some OA, tPA activity was expressed together with variable amounts of uPA mediated activity. By contrast, most RA synovial tissues exhibited considerably increased uPA activity over the proliferative lining areas, while tPA activity was reduced when compared with N and OA synovial tissues. This increase in uPA activity was associated with increased levels of uPA antigen and its corresponding mRNA, which were localised over the synovial proliferative lining areas. In addition, in RA tissues, expression of the specific uPA receptor (uPAR) and of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1