Categorical proof theory of classical propositional calculus

We investigate semantics for classical proof based on the sequent calculus. We show that the propositional connectives are not quite well-behaved from a traditional categorical perspective, and give a more refined, but necessarily complex, analysis of how connectives may be characterised abstractly. Finally we explain the consequences of insisting on more familiar categorical behaviour.     

Finite-valued Semantics for Canonical Labelled Calculi

We define a general family of canonical labelled calculi, of which many previously studied sequent and labelled calculi are particular instances. We then provide a uniform and modular method to obtain finite-valued semantics for every canonical labelled calculus by introducing the notion of partial non-deterministic matrices. The semantics is applied to provide simple decidable semantic criteria for two crucial syntactic properties of these calculi: (strong) analyticity and cut-admissibility. Finally, we demonstrate an application of this framework for a large family of paraconsistent logics.     

A new framework for declarative programming

We propose a new framework for the syntax and semantics of Weak Hereditarily Harrop logic programming with constraints, based on resolution over τ-categories: finite product categories with canonical structure.

Constraint information is directly built-in to the notion of signature via categorical syntax. Many-sorted equational are a special case of the formalism which combines features of uniform logic programming languages (moduels and hypothetical implication) with those of constraint logic programming. Using the cannoical structure supplied by τ-categories, we define a diagrammatic generalization of formulas, goals, programs and resolution proofs up to equality (rather than just up to isomorphism).

We extend the Kowalski-van Emden fixed point interpretation, a cornerstone of declarative semantics, to an operational, non-ground, categorical semantics based on indexing over sorts and programs.

We also introduce a topos-theoretic declarative semantics and show soundness and completeness of resolution proofs and of a sequent calculus over the categorical signature. We conclude with a discussion of semantic perspectives on uniform logic programming.     

Presenting functors on many-sorted varieties and applications

This paper studies several applications of the notion of a presentation of a functor by operations and equations. We show that the technically straightforward generalisation of this notion from the one-sorted to the many-sorted case has several interesting consequences. First, it can be applied to give equational logic for the binding algebras modelling abstract syntax. Second, it provides a categorical approach to algebraic semantics of first-order logic. Third, this notion links the uniform treatment of logics for coalgebras of an arbitrary type T with concrete syntax and proof systems. Analysing the many-sorted case is essential for modular completeness proofs of coalgebraic logics.     

Uniform semantic treatment of default and autoepistemic logics

We revisit the issue of epistemological and semantic foundations for autoepistemic and default logics, two leading formalisms in nonmonotonic reasoning. We develop a general semantic approach to autoepistemic and default logics that is based on the notion of a belief pair and that exploits the lattice structure of the collection of all belief pairs. For each logic, we introduce a monotone operator on the lattice of belief pairs. We then show that a whole family of semantics can be defined in a systematic and principled way in terms of fixpoints of this operator (or as fixpoints of certain closely related operators). Our approach elucidates fundamental constructive principles in which agents form their belief sets, and leads to approximation semantics for autoepistemic and default logics. It also allows us to establish a precise one-to-one correspondence between the family of semantics for default logic and the family of semantics for autoepistemic logic. The correspondence exploits the modal interpretation of a default proposed by Konolige. Our results establish conclusively that default logic can be viewed as a fragment of autoepistemic logic, a result that has been long anticipated. At the same time, they explain the source of the difficulty to formally relate the semantics of default extensions by Reiter and autoepistemic expansions by Moore. These two semantics occupy different locations in the corresponding families of semantics for default and autoepistemic logics.     

Lifting Infinite Normal Form Definitions From Term Rewriting to Term Graph Rewriting

nfinite normal forms are a way of giving semantics to non-terminating rewrite systems. The notion is a generalization of the Böhm tree in the lambda calculus. It was first introduced in [Ariola, Z. M. and S. Blom, Cyclic lambda calculi, in: Abadi and Ito [Abadi, M. and T. Ito, editors, “Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1281, Springer Verlag, 1997], pp. 77–106] to provide semantics for a lambda calculus on terms with letrec. In that paper infinite normal forms were defined directly on the graph rewrite system. In [Blom, S., “Term Graph Rewriting - syntax and semantics,” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2001)] the framework was improved by defining the infinite normal form of a term graph using the infinite normal form on terms. This approach of lifting the definition makes the non-confluence problems introduced into term graph rewriting by substitution rules much easier to deal with. In this paper, we give a simplified presentation of the latter approach.     

Filter models for conjunctive-disjunctive λ-calculi

The distinction between the conjunctive nature of non-determinism as opposed to the disjunctive character of parallelism constitutes the motivation and the starting point of the present work. λ-calculus is extended with both a non-deterministic choice and a parallel operator; a notion of reduction is introduced, extending β-reduction of the classical calculus. We study type assignment systems for this calculus, together with a denotational semantics which is initially defined constructing a set semimodel via simple types. We enrich the type system with intersection and union types, dually reflecting the disjunctive and conjunctive behaviour of the operators, and we build a filter model. The theory of this model is compared both with a Morris-style operational semantics and with a semantics based on a notion of capabilities.     

Maximal traces and path-based coalgebraic temporal logics

This paper gives a general coalgebraic account of temporal logics whose semantics involves a notion of computation path. Examples of such logics include the logic CTL* for transition systems and the logic PCTL for probabilistic transition systems. Our path-based temporal logics are interpreted over coalgebras of endofunctors obtained as the composition of a computation type (e.g. non-deterministic or stochastic) with a general transition type. The semantics of such logics relies on the existence of execution maps similar to the trace maps introduced by Jacobs and co-authors as part of the coalgebraic theory of finite traces (Hasuo et al., 2007 [1]). We consider finite execution maps derived from the theory of finite traces, and a new notion of maximal execution map that accounts for maximal, possibly infinite executions. The latter is needed to recover the logics CTL* and PCTL as specific path-based logics.     

Constructive linear-time temporal logic: Proof systems and Kripke semantics

In this paper we study a version of constructive linear-time temporal logic (LTL) with the “next” temporal operator. The logic is originally due to Davies, who has shown that the proof system of the logic corresponds to a type system for binding-time analysis via the Curry-Howard isomorphism. However, he did not investigate the logic itself in detail; he has proved only that the logic augmented with negation and classical reasoning is equivalent to (the “next” fragment of) the standard formulation of classical linear-time temporal logic. We give natural deduction, sequent calculus and Hilbert-style proof systems for constructive LTL with conjunction, disjunction and falsehood, and show that the sequent calculus enjoys cut elimination. Moreover, we also consider Kripke semantics and prove soundness and completeness. One distinguishing feature of this logic is that distributivity of the “next” operator over disjunction “?(A∨B)⊃?A∨?B” is rejected in view of a type-theoretic interpretation.     

A proof-theoretic foundation of abortive continuations

We give an analysis of various classical axioms and characterize a notion of minimal classical logic that enforces Peirce’s law without enforcing Ex Falso Quodlibet. We show that a “natural” implementation of this logic is Parigot’s classical natural deduction. We then move on to the computational side and emphasize that Parigot’s λ μ corresponds to minimal classical logic. A continuation constant must be added to λ μ to get full classical logic. The extended calculus is isomorphic to a syntactical restriction of Felleisen’s theory of control that offers a more expressive reduction semantics. This isomorphic calculus is in correspondence with a refined version of Prawitz’s natural deduction. This article is an extended version of the conference article “Minimal Classical Logic and Control Operators” (Ariola and Herbelin, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2719, pp. 871–885, 2003). A longer version is available as a technical report (Ariola et al., Technical Report TR608, Indiana University, 2005). Z.M. Ariola supported by National Science Foundation grant number CCR-0204389. A. Sabry supported by National Science Foundation grant number CCR-0204389, by a Visiting Researcher position at Microsoft Research, Cambridge, U.K., and by a Visiting Professor position at the University of Genova, Italy.     

A categorical model for the geometry of interaction

We consider the multiplicative and exponential fragment of linear logic (MELL) and give a geometry of interaction (GoI) semantics for it based on unique decomposition categories. We prove a soundness and finiteness theorem for this interpretation. We show that Girard's original approach to GoI 1 via operator algebras is exactly captured in this categorical framework.     

Specifying coalgebras with modal logic

We propose to use modal logic as a logic for coalgebras and discuss it in view of the work done on coalgebras as a semantics of object-oriented programming. Two approaches are taken: First, standard concepts of modal logic are applied to coalgebras. For a certain kind of functor it is shown that the logic exactly captures the notion of bisimulation and a complete calculus is given. Examples of verifications of object properties are given. Second, we discuss the relationship of this approach with the coalgebraic logic of Moss (Coalgebraic logic, Ann Pure Appl. Logic 96 (1999) 277–317.).     

An improved refutation system for intuitionistic predicate logic

In this paper a refutation calculus for intuitionistic predicate logic is presented where the necessity of duplicating formulas to which rules are applied is analyzed. In line with the semantics of intuitionistic logic in terms of Kripke models a new signF _C beside the SignsT andF is added which reduces the size of the proofs and the involved nondeterminism. The resulting calculus is proved to be correct and complete. An extension of it for Kuroda logic is given.     

移动界程演算理论及应用研究综述

移动界程演算通过界程这一核心概念来表达有边界的计算场所,并提供界程移动,认证和授权等能力从最基础层次刻画移动计算的本质,成为了移动计算系统形式化理论和应用领域内的重要研究分支。对移动界程演算的理论及应用方面的研究和发展进行了概述,对移动界演算的扩展语义和代数性质的分析方法、移动界演算的空间逻辑和模型检测算法以及移动界程在计算系统建模方面应用现状进行了整理和分析,并对该领域未来进一步研究的方向进行了展望。     

A semantic measure of the execution time in linear logic

We give a semantic account of the execution time (i.e. the number of cut elimination steps leading to the normal form) of an untyped MELL net. We first prove that: (1) a net is head-normalizable (i.e. normalizable at depth 0) if and only if its interpretation in the multiset based relational semantics is not empty and (2) a net is normalizable if and only if its exhaustive interpretation (a suitable restriction of its interpretation) is not empty. We then give a semantic measure of execution time: we prove that we can compute the number of cut elimination steps leading to a cut free normal form of the net obtained by connecting two cut free nets by means of a cut-link, from the interpretations of the two cut free nets. These results are inspired by similar ones obtained by the first author for the untyped lambda-calculus.     

A modal logic internalizing normal proofs

In the proof-theoretic study of logic, the notion of normal proof has been understood and investigated as a metalogical property. Usually we formulate a system of logic, identify a class of proofs as normal proofs, and show that every proof in the system reduces to a corresponding normal proof. This paper develops a system of modal logic that is capable of expressing the notion of normal proof within the system itself, thereby making normal proofs an inherent property of the logic. Using a modality △ to express the existence of a normal proof, the system provides a means for both recognizing and manipulating its own normal proofs. We develop the system as a sequent calculus with the implication connective ⊃ and the modality △, and prove the cut elimination theorem. From the sequent calculus, we derive two equivalent natural deduction systems.     

ERL: Logic for entity-relationship databases

We develop a logic for entity-relationship databases, ERL, that is a generalization of database logic. ERL provides advantages to the ER model much as FOL (first-order logic) does to the relational model: a uniform language for expressing database schema, integrity constraints, and database manipulation; clearly defined semantics; the capability to express database transformations; and deductive capabilities. We propose three query languages for ER databases called ERRC, ERSQL, and ERQBE, which are generalizations of the relational calculus, SQL, and QBE, respectively. We use example queries and updates to demonstrate the capabilities of these languages. We apply database transformations to introduce the notion of views and to show that both ERRC and ERSQL are relationally complete.Research sponsored in part by the National Science Foundation under grant IRI-8921951 and by Towson State University.     

An Observational Theory for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (full version)

We propose a process calculus to study the behavioural theory of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. The operational semantics of our calculus is given both in terms of a Reduction Semantics and in terms of a Labelled Transition Semantics. We prove that the two semantics coincide. The labelled transition system is then used to derive the notions of (weak) simulation and bisimulation for ad hoc networks. The labelled bisimilarity completely characterises reduction barbed congruence, a standard branching-time and contextually-defined program equivalence. We then use our (bi)simulation proof method to formally prove a number of non-trivial properties of ad hoc networks.