Polypropylene‐dispersed domain as potential nucleating agent in PS and PMMA solid‐state foaming

The potential of using dispersive domains in a polymer blend as a bubble nucleating agent was investigated by exploiting its high dispersibility in a matrix polymer in the molten state and its immiscibility in the solid state. In this experiments, polypropylene (PP) was used as the nucleating agent in polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) foams at the weight fraction of 10, 20, and 30 wt %. PP creates highly dispersed domains in PS and PMMA matrices during the extrusion processing. The high diffusivity of the physical foaming agent, i.e., CO₂ in PP, and the high interfacial tension of PP with PS and PMMA could be beneficial for providing preferential bubble nucleation sites. The experimental results of the pressure quench solid‐state foaming of PS/PP and PMMA/PP blends verified that the dispersed PP could successfully increase the cell density over 10⁶ cells/cm³ for PS/PP and 10⁷ cells/cm³ for PMMA/PP blend and reduce the cell size to 24 μm for PS/PP and 9 μm for PMMA/PP blends foams. The higher interfacial tension between PP and the matrix polymer created a unique cell morphology where dispersed PP particles were trapped inside cells in the foam. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

The characteristic properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/polystyrene core‐shell composite polymer latex

In this study, the poly(methyl methacrylate/polystyrene (PMMA/PS) core‐shell composite latex was synthesized by the method of soapless seeded emulsion polymerization. The morphology of the PMMA/PS composite latex was core‐shell structure, with PMMA as the core and PS as the shell. The core‐shell morphology of the composite polymer latex was found to be thermally unstable. Under the effect of thermal annealing, the PS shell region first dispersed into the PMMA core region, and later separated out to the outside of the PMMA core region. This was explained on the basis of lowing interfacial tension between the PMMA and PS phases owing to the interpenetration layer. The interpenetration layer, which was located at the interface of the core and shell region, contained graft copolymer and entangled polymer chains. Both the graft copolymer and entangled polymer chains had the ability to lower the interfacial tension between the PMMA and PS phases. Also, the effect of thermal annealing on the morphology of commercial polymer/composite latex polymer blends was examined. The result showed that the core‐shell composite latex had the ability to enhance the compatibility of the components of polymer blends. The compatibilizing ability of the core‐shell composite latex was better than that of a random copolymer. Moreover, the effect of the amount of core‐shell composite latex on the morphology of the polymer blend was investigated. The polymer blends, which contained composite latex above 50% wt, showed the morphology of a double sea‐island structure. In addition, the composite latex was completely dissolved in solvent to destroy the core‐shell structure and release the entangled polymer chains, and then dried to form the entangled free composite polymer. The entangled free composite polymer had the ability to enhance the compatibility of the components of the polymer blend as usual. The weight ratio 3/7 commercial polymer/entangled free composite polymer blend showed the morphology of the phase inversion structure. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 312–321, 2003     

Promoting effect of crystallization on the foaming behavior in polypropylene homopolymer/polypropylene block copolymer blends

Polypropylene (PP) is a kind of semi‐crystalline polymer so it is hard to foam with supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO₂). We used polypropylene block (PP‐B) copolymer as a modifier to improve the crystallization behaviors and foaming performance of polypropylene homo polymer (HPP). HPP, PP‐B, and a series of HPP/PP‐B blends were characterized by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), X‐ray diffraction, and polarized optical microscope. Results show that both the crystallization behaviors and melt strength have influence on the cell structure. The crystallization temperature of PP‐B is about 7°C higher than that of HPP and that the crystallization behavior of HPP/PP‐B blends is similar to that of PP‐B. Much denser and smaller size spherulites are observed in PP‐B and HPP/PP‐B blends than in HPP, and the crystal structure is unchanged after blending. Scanning electron microscope results show that much more uniform, smaller cells can be obtained for the HPP/PP‐B blends. The crystal nuclei formed earlier can act as physical crosslink points, increasing the melt strength and improving dramatically the cell structure and morphology of the HPP/PP‐B blends. Furthermore, the best cell structure and morphology was achieved for HPP/PP‐B blends with the ratio of 70/30 under the same foaming conditions. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1175–1181, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

CO2 foaming of poly(ethylene glycol)/polystyrene blends: Relationship of the blend morphology,CO2 mass transfer,and cellular structure

When polymer blends are foamed by physical foaming agents, such as CO₂ or N₂, not only the morphology and viscosity of the blend polymers but also the solubility and diffusivity of the physical foaming agents in the polymers determine the cellular structure: closed cell or open cell and monomodal or bimodal. The foam of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)/polystyrene (PS) blends shows a unique bimodal (large and small) cellular structure, in which the large‐size cells embrace a PEG particle. Depending on the foaming condition, the average size of the large cells ranges from 40 to 500 μm, whereas that of small cells becomes less than 20 μm, which is smaller than that of neat PS foams. The formation mechanism of the cellular structure has been investigated from the viewpoint of the morphology and viscosity of the blend polymer and the mass‐transfer rate of the physical foaming agent in each polymer phase. The solubility and diffusivity of CO₂, which determine the mass‐transfer rate of CO₂ from the matrix to the bubbles, were measured by a gravimetric measurement, that is, a magnetic suspension balance. The solubility and diffusivity of CO₂ in PS differed from those in PEG: the diffusion coefficient of CO₂ in PEG at 110°C was 3.36 × 10^?9 m²/s, and that in PS was 2.38 × 10^?10 m²/s. Henry's constant in PEG was 5600 cm³ (STP)/(kg MPa) at 110°C, and that in PS was 3100 cm³ (STP)/(kg MPa). These differences in the transport properties, morphology of the blend, and CO₂‐induced viscosity depression are the control factors for creating the unique cellular structure in PEG/PS blends. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1899–1906, 2005     

The effect of incorporation of POSS units on polymer blend compatibility

In this work, the compatibility of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polystyrene (PS) polymers with their polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) copolymers combined by solution blending is investigated, to determine the effect of incorporation of the POSS unit on polymer compatibility. The morphology of these tethered POSS copolymer/polymer blends was studied by electron microscopy, thermal analysis, and density. Although the basic PS/PMMA blend was clearly immiscible, it was also found that the incorporation of POSS into the PS chain led to incompatibility when the POSScoPS copolymer was blended with PS homopolymer. However, conversely, in the case where the POSS moiety was included as part of a copolymer with PMMA, the copolymer was miscible with the PMMA homopolymer. The presence of isobutyl units on the corners of POSS cage is clearly sufficient to encourage miscibility with PMMA. Interestingly, blends of the two different POSS copolymers led to an immiscible structure, despite having the common POSS units, the interactions between the POSS moieties clearly not being sufficient to drive compatibility. The POSS copolymers have also been used as interfacial agents in immiscible PS and PMMA blend, and it has been found that the appearance of the interface bonding is improved, although the phase morphology is only slightly changed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

CO2 foaming based on polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend and nanoclay

A poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and nanoclay composite was dispersed into polystyrene (PS) using a twin‐screw extruder. The mixture was then batch foamed with supercritical CO₂. It was found that the cell density of foams based on the blend is higher than that based on the weight average of the two pure polymer components at the same foaming conditions. The cell size decreases and the cell density increases with the increase of the PMMA domain size. One explanation is that the large PMMA domains serve as a CO₂ reservoir and the nucleation in the PS phase is enhanced by the diffusion of CO₂ from the PMMA phase to the PS phase. Very small PMMA domains cannot function as a CO₂ reservoir, and so they are not able to facilitate the nucleation. A much higher cell density and smaller cell size were observed when nanoclay was located at the interface of the PMMA and the PS domains, serving as the heterogeneous nucleating agents. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:103–111, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Elongational viscosity for miscible and immiscible polymer blends. II. Blends with a small amount of UHMW polymer

The effect of miscibility on elongational viscosity of polymer blends was investigated in homogeneous, miscible, and immiscible states by the blend of 1.5 wt % of ultrahigh‐molecular‐weight (UHMW) polymer. The matrix polymer was either poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), or poly(acrylonitrile‐co‐styrene) (AS) that has a comparable elongational viscosity value. The homogeneous blend consisted of 98.5 wt % of PMMA and 1.5 wt % of UHMW–PMMA. The miscible blend was composed of AS and UHMW–PMMA at the same ratio. The immiscible blend was a combination of AS and UHMW–polystyrene (PS) at the same ratio. The strain‐hardening behavior of the different blends were compared with that of pure PMMA. It was demonstrated that 1.5 wt % of UHMW induces a strong strain‐hardening property in the homogeneous and miscible blends but was hardly changed in the immiscible blend. The optical microscope observation of the immiscible blend suggested that the UHMW domains were stretched, but that the degree of domain deformation was less than a given elongational strain. It was concluded that the strain‐hardening property is strongly affected by the miscibility of UHMW chain and matrix. The strong strain‐hardening property is caused by the deformation of the UHMW polymer. UHMW chains are stretched when they are entangled with surrounding polymers. However, UHMW chains in an immiscible state are not so deformed because of viscosity difference and no entanglements between domain and matrix. A smaller degree of UHMW chain deformation in immiscible state results in weaker strain‐hardening property. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 961–969, 1999     

Nanostructured polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐polybutadiene‐b‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers modified with polystyrene and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) homopolymers

Morphologies of polymer blends based on polystyrene‐b‐ polybutadiene‐b ‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM) triblock copolymer were predicted, adopting the phase diagram proposed by Stadler and co‐workers for neat SBM block copolymer, and were experimentally proved using atomic force microscopy. All investigated polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymer modified with polystyrene (PS) and/or poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) homopolymers showed the expected nanostructures. For polymer blends of symmetric SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with PS homopolymer, the cylinders in cylinders core?shell morphology and the perforated lamellae morphology were obtained. Moreover, modifying the same SBM‐1 triblock copolymer with both PS and PMMA homopolymers the cylinders at cylinders morphology was reached. The predictions for morphologies of blends based on asymmetric SBM‐2 triblock copolymer were also confirmed experimentally, visualizing a spheres over spheres structure. This work presents an easy way of using PS and/or PMMA homopolymers for preparing nanostructured polymer blends based on SBM triblock copolymers with desired morphologies, similar to those of neat SBM block copolymers. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphology of polystyrene/poly(dimethyl siloxane) blends compatibilized with star polymers containing a γ-cyclodextrin core and polystyrene arms

A star polymer with a γ-CD core and PS arms is used to compatibilize blends of the immiscible polymers PS and PDMS. The mechanism of compatibilization is threading of the CD core by PDMS and subsequent solubilization in the PS matrix facilitated by the star arms. Spun-cast films of this blend are examined with optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. Blends without CD-star exhibit large-scale phase separation, whereas those containing CD-star exhibit very homogeneous morphologies in the optical microscope and nanometer-sized phase domains in the AFM. The effect of PDMS molecular weight on the blend morphology is insignificant. The morphology of the compatibilized films does not change significantly after annealing at 125 °C for 3 days, indicating that the CD-star polymer effectively stabilizes these blends at temperatures where both polymers are mobile and could otherwise undergo large-scale phase separation. The degree of compatibilization in these blends is correlated with the molar ratio of PDMS repeat units to CD-star molecules.     

A modified model predictions and experimental results of weld-line strength in injection molded PS/PMMA blends

In this paper, the model based on melt diffusion and Flory-Huggins free energy theory for predicting the weld-line strength of injection molded amorphous polymers and polymer blends parts were modified by considering the diffusion thickness in the interface as a function of contact time. The modified model for weld-line strength prediction of homopolymers and polymer blends were, respectively, used to evaluate the weld-line strength of Polystyrene (PS) and Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), and that of PS/PMMA blends. The model predictions show that the theoretic predictions as a function of temperature and contact time for PS, PMMA and PS/PMMA (80/20, 70/30) are in good agreements with corresponding experimental results. However, the model predictions for PS/PMMA (20/80, 30/70) blends are much higher than experimental results. The morphology in weld-line regions for PS/PMMA (20/80, 30/70) shows lack of dispersed PS phase. Near the weld-line regions, dispersed PS phase is highly oriented along the weld-line. In theoretic prediction for polymer blends, three kinds of diffusion: Polymer A-Polymer A and Polymer B-Polymer B self-diffusions and Polymer A-Polymer B mutual diffusion were considered. This is why model predictions for PS/PMMA (20/80, 30/70) blends are higher than experimental results.     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

The effect of dispersed elastomer particle size on heterogeneous nucleation of TPO with N2 foaming

Blending polypropylene (PP) with elastomeric modifiers provides a simple method of improving polymer's impact strength. Such PP/elastomer blends are commonly called thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) blends. Developing TPO materials suitable for foaming is of great interest because they can be applied in high-volume markets such as the automotive industry. For immiscible polymer blends such as TPO, it has been often noted that the dispersed particles can act as cell nucleating agents, thereby enhancing heterogeneous nucleation. However, little work has been done to assess the effects of blend morphology on the nucleation behavior. Furthermore, the effects of elastomer dispersion on TPO foamability are still unknown. In this work, TPO blends with different blend morphologies were prepared by controlling the viscosity ratio between the blending components. Experimental results from both batch foaming and extrusion foaming processes with nitrogen (N₂) indicate that the foam structure is influenced by the size and the number density of the dispersed particles.     

A study on weld line morphology and mechanical strength of injection molded polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

In this work, the mechanical strength and weld line morphology of injection molded polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS/PMMA) blends were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mechanical property test. The experimental results show that the tensile strength of PS/PMMA blends get greatly decreased due to the presence of the weld line. Although the tensile strength without the weld line of PS/PMMA (70/30) is much higher than that of the PS/PMMA (30/70) blend, their tensile strength with weld line shows reversed change. The viscosity ratio of dispersed phase over matrix is a very important parameter for control of weld‐line morphology of the immiscible polymer blend. In PS/PMMA (70/30) blend, the PMMA dispersed domains at the core of the weld line are spherically shaped, which is the same as bulk. While in the PS/PMMA (30/70) blend, the viscosity of the dispersed PS phase is lower than that of the PMMA matrix, the PS phase is absent at the weld line, and PS particles are highly oriented parallel to the weld line, which is a stress concentrator. This is why weld line strength of PS/PMMA (30/70) is lower than that of PS/PMMA (70/30) blend. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 1856–1865, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10450     

Investigation on particular phase morphology of immiscible polyamide 12 and polystyrene blends prepared via anionic ring‐opening polymerization

In this article, the particular phase morphology of immiscible polyamide 12/polystyrene (PA12/PS) blends prepared via in situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization of laurolactam (LL) in the presence of polystyrene (PS) was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier Transform infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to analyze the morphology of the blends. The results show that the PS is dispersed as small droplets in the continuous matrix of PA12 when PS content is 5 wt%. However, when the PS content is higher than 10 wt%, two particular phase morphologies appeared. Firstly, dispersed PS‐rich particles with the spherical inclusions of PA12 can be found when PS content is between 10 and 15 wt%. Then the phase inversion occurred (the phase morphology of the PA12/PS blends changed from the PS dispersed/PA12 matrix to PA12 dispersed/PS matrix system) when PS content is 20 wt% or higher, which is unusual for polymer blends prepared via conventional methods such as mixing, hydrolytic polycondensation and so on. The formation of this particular phase morphology development was simply elucidated via a phase inversion mechanism. Furthermore, the stability of the phase morphology of the PA12/PS blends after annealing at 230°C was also investigated via SEM. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 52:1831–1838, 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of poly(butylenes succinate) on the microcellular foaming of polylactide using supercritical carbon dioxide

Microcellular Polylactide (PLA) and PLA/poly(butylenes succinate) (PBS) foams were prepared by batch foaming process with supercritical carbon dioxide. The introduced PBS phase was immiscible with the PLA matrix and separated as domains. The study of CO₂ solubility in PLA and PLA/PBS blends indicated the addition of PBS decreased the gas solubility due to the poor affinity of CO₂ for PBS. The crystallization behavior of PLA was enhanced by small amount of PBS with lower cold crystallization temperature and higher crystallinity. However, separated PBS droplets led to less perfect and small crystallites, which showed greatly effect for the PLA foaming process. The investigation on the foaming conditions dependence indicated the PLA/PBS blends required higher temperature and longer time for the cell growth, which were nucleated around the interface between PLA and PBS. With less CO₂ content in the PLA or PLA/PBS blends after different desorption time, the final cell morphology exhibited more uniform size distribution with bigger average cell size and smaller cell density. Different from the well closed-cell structure for neat PLA foam, the PLA/PBS foam presented open cell structure due to the cell nucleation around the PLA/PBS interface and the lower melt strength of PBS phase.     

Compatibilization Mechanism of Nanoclay in Immiscible PS/PMMA Blend Using Unmodified Nanoclay

Organically modified nanoclays have been reported to play the role of a compatibilizer for immiscible polymer blends. However, the mechanism of compatibilization by nanoclay has been reported differently. In this work, we investigated the exact mechanism of compatibilization of nanoclay in immiscible polystyrene (PS)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blend in the presence of sodium-montmorillonite (Na-MMT) through selective dispersion of clay in the matrix phase. Through a detailed investigation of the morphology of PS/PMMA/Na-MMT blend nanocomposites, the plausible mechanism behind the compatibilization effect of clay in immiscible blends has been proposed.     

Thermal behavior and properties of polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The thermal behavior and properties of immiscible blends of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with and without PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer at different melt blending times were investigated by use of a differential scanning calorimeter. The weight fraction of PS in the blends ranged from 0.1 to 0.9. From the measured glass transition temperature (T_g) and specific heat increment (ΔC_p) at the T_g, the PMMA appeared to dissolve more in the PS phase than did the PS in the PMMA phase. The addition of a PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends slightly promoted the solubility of the PMMA in the PS and increased the interfacial adhesion between PS and PMMA phases during processing. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the presence of the PS‐b‐PMMA diblock copolymer in the PS/PMMA blends afforded protection against thermal degradation and improved their thermal stability. Also, it was found that the PS was more stable against thermal degradation than that of the PMMA over the entire heating range. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 609–620, 2004     

Correlation of the melt rheological properties with the foaming behavior of immiscible blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)

Immiscible blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (PPE/SAN) were batch‐foamed using CO₂ as a blowing agent as a function of foaming temperature, foaming time, and blend composition. Evaluation of the resulting cellular morphology revealed an enhanced foamability of SAN with PPE contents up to 20 wt% as indicated by a similar volume expansion but a significantly reduced mean cell size. This behavior is related to a heterogeneous nucleation activity by the dispersed PPE phase. A further increasing PPE content, however, leads to increasing foam densities as well as nonuniform foam morphologies. The changes in the foaming behavior can be correlated with the melt rheological properties and the corresponding blend morphology. Shear‐rheological investigations revealed an onset of percolation of the dispersed PPE phase between 20 and 40 wt%, and a transition towards cocontinuity at 60 wt%. The materials response under uniaxial elongational flow, as assessed by Rheotens measurements, revealed an increase in elongational viscosity scaling with the PPE content, similar to the shear data. However, the strain hardening behavior was reduced by increasing PPE contents and, at 20 wt%, the drawability revealed a significant drop‐both phenomena limiting the foamability of polymers. In summary, the present study discusses fundamental aspects of foaming immiscible PPE/SAN blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 48:2111–2125, 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Temperature‐induced morphological evolution in polymer blends produced by cryogenic mechanical alloying

Novel nanoscale morphologies are achieved in blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and either polyisoprene (PI) or poly(ethylene‐alt‐propylene) (PEP) produced by high‐energy mechanical alloying at cryogenic temperatures. Since the blends are prepared as solid powders, they must be post‐processed in the melt to be of practical relevance. In this study, we employ scanning transmission X‐ray microscopy (STXM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and light microscopy (LM) to investigate the stability of nanostructural features and the dynamics of phase coarsening at elevated temperatures (above the glass transition temperature of milled PMMA). Substantial coarsening is observed in PEP/PMMA blends at relatively short times, indicating that the two polymers are highly immiscible and mobile at the conditions examined. The nanostructure evident in PI/PMMA blends is, however, more robust and undergoes less evolution due to milling‐induced PI crosslinking. Instead of forming discrete dispersions in a PMMA matrix, the PI molecules organize into a fine network morphology upon annealing in the melt.     

Kinetics-controlled compatibilization of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene blends using nano-SiO2 particles

Rigid inorganic filler has been long time used as a reinforcement agent for polymer materials. Recently, more work is focused on the possibility that using filler as a compatibilizer for immiscible polymer blends. In this article, we reported our efforts on the change of phase morphology and properties of immiscible polypropylene(PP)/polystyrene(PS) blends compatibilized with nano-SiO₂ particles. The effects of filler content and mixing time on the phase morphology, crystallization behavior, rheology, and mechanical properties were investigated by SEM, DSC, ARES and mechanical test. A drastic reduction of PS phase size and a very homogeneous size distribution were observed by introducing nano-SiO₂ particles in the blends at short mixing time. However, at longer mixing time an increase of PS size was seen again, indicating a kinetics-controlled compatibilization. This conclusion was further supported by the unchanged glass transition temperature of PS and by increased viscosity in the blends after adding nano-SiO₂ particles. The compatibilization mechanism of nano-SiO₂ particles in PP/PS blends was proposed based on kinetics consideration.