Effect of different immunosuppressive agents on acute pancreatitis: a comparative study in an improved animal model

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drugs have been associated with the development and progression of acute pancreatitis after organ transplantation. Consequently, a reduction or a change in immunosuppressive therapy has been recommended once posttransplantation pancreatitis has been suspected. However, it is not known which of the available immunosuppressive agents is most harmful to the pancreas and which may be used safely in this situation. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different immunosuppressive drugs in various dosages on intrapancreatic protease activation, acinar cell necrosis, and mortality in an improved model of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the rat. The rat model of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, like posttransplantation pancreatitis, is characterized by ischemia and microcirculatory disorders. METHOD: Acute pancreatitis was induced in rats by using a combination of low-dose controlled intraductal glycodeoxycholic acid superimposed on intravenous cerulein hyperstimulation. Six hours thereafter, animals were randomized to intravenous therapy with 2, 10, or 50 mg/kg/day prednisolone (PRED); 3, 15, or 60 mg/kg/day cyclosporine A (CsA); 10 mg/kg/day azathioprine (AZA); 0.6 mg/kg/day orthoclone OKT3 (OKT3); or saline. After 36 hr, surviving animals were killed to determine acinar cell necrosis and trypsinogen activation peptides levels (TAP) in blood and ascites. RESULTS: Compared with saline-treated control rats, animals treated with 60 mg/kg/day CsA developed significantly more acinar cell necrosis and had increased amounts of TAP in ascites. Likewise, there was more extensive acinar cell necrosis in animals subjected to AZA therapy. However, this was not associated with incremental TAP. Animals treated with 3 or 15 mg/kg/day CsA, OKT3, or PRED showed no significant changes in these target parameters. Animals given 10 or 50 mg/kg/day PRED even had decreased hematocrit values and produced significantly less ascites than animals in the other groups. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that AZA and high doses of CsA aggravate acute pancreatitis and should, therefore, be avoided once posttransplantation pancreatitis has been suspected, whereas lower doses of CsA, OKT3, and PRED may be used safely. PRED can even be used at higher doses as may be required when graft rejection is suspected.     

Image analysis of Ag-NOR proteins in transitional cell bladder cancer

Cyclosporin (CsA) and azathioprine (AZA) are useful immunosuppressive drugs in the management of kidney and liver transplant recipients. We investigated urinary mutagenicity in three groups of kidney transplant recipients after different immunosuppressive protocols. Urinary mutagenicity was detected in a base-pair strain, E. coli WP2uvrA, in a liquid incubation assay. No mutagenic activity was detected in the urines of patients treated with CsA (4.5 mg/kg); 85% of the urines in the second group treated with AZA (1.26 mg/kg) showed high mutagenic activity, whereas mutagenic activity was found in 40% of the urines of subjects treated with CsA and AZA (3.89 mg/kg + 1.15 mg/kg). These data suggest that immunosuppressive therapy with AZA carriers a high risk of urinary mutagenicity, while immunosuppressive combined treatment with CsA and AZA significantly reduces this risk.     

Mycophenolate mofetil, together with cyclosporin A, prevents anti-OKT3 antibody response in kidney transplant recipients

OKT3 monoclonal antibody, a murine IgG2a monoclonal antibody targeting the T cell CD3 antigen, elicits a neutralizing humoral response in 20 to 50% of kidney transplant recipients when the concomitant immunosuppression consists of CsA-Sandimmun (SAND) and azathioprine (AZA). In the present study, we investigated the impact of the newer agents, CsA-Neoral (NEO) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on OKT3 sensitization. Sixty-two consecutive kidney transplant recipients received prophylactic OKT3 (5 mg/d) from days 0 to 13, together with steroids. Concomitant immunosuppression consisted of either AZA + SAND (n=20), AZA + NEO (n=31), or MMF + NEO (n=11). The following doses were used: AZA, 2 mg/kg per d from days 0 to 13, then 1 mg/kg per d; MMF, 2 g/d starting on day 1; and CsA, either SAND or NEO, 6 mg/kg per d from day 6. At least two serum samples per month were available during the initial 3 mo for each patient. IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies were first evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were considered sensitized if their serum scored positive at a dilution > or = 1/1000. Peak titers of IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies and the incidence of patients harboring neutralizing anti-idiotypic antibodies were also determined. A first reduction in OKT3 sensitization was seen in patients receiving Neoral instead of Sandimmun (AZA + SAND: 10 of 20 [50%] patients sensitized versus 6 of 31 [19%] in the AZA + NEO group; P=0.03). This was probably related to the achievement of higher mean CsA trough blood levels in the NEO group during the first month (253+/-44 versus 186+/-49 ng/ml in SAND patients). Peak antibody titers and the proportion of patients with anti-idiotypic antibodies were similar in the AZA + SAND and AZA + NEO groups. A further reduction in the sensitization rate was observed with the replacement of AZA by MMF (MMF + NEO: 0% sensitized patients; P=0.0013). It is concluded that the combination of CsA-Neoral and MMF efficiently prevents sensitization against OKT3.     

Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: Historically, the acute rejection rates in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients have been extremely high (50-80%), with many second and third rejection episodes despite the use of quadruple immunosuppression (antibody induction and cyclosporine [CsA]-azathioprine [AZA]-based maintenance immunosuppression). Although this acute rejection has rarely led to graft loss, it has been a great cause of morbidity and of significantly increased cost. In an attempt to decrease the acute rejection rate and related morbidity in SPK transplant recipients, we compared two "state-of-the-art" immunosuppression regimens in a prospective, randomized, single-center study. METHODS: Patients who received SPK transplants were randomized to receive either tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=18) or CsA (Neoral formulation) and MMF (n=18). All patients received OKT3 induction and prednisone, which was tapered to 5 mg/day by 6 months after transplantation. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven. In addition, metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, serum cholesterol), drug toxicity, and infection also were measured. Data were compared with that of a historical group (n=18) who received conventional CsA (Sandimmune formulation) and AZA-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11% in both the TAC-MMF and CsA-MMF groups with only two patients in each group experiencing a rejection episode. This rejection rate was significantly decreased from that of the CsA-AZA historical group (77%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in infection rates, including cytomegalovirus, or in metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, and cholesterol levels). All patients remained on their initial immunosuppression regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Between 3 and 6 months after transplantation, three patients were switched from TAC to CsA for recurrent migraine headaches, posttransplant diabetes, and chronic cytomegalovirus infection. Two patients in the CsA-MMF group died of nonimmunologic causes (aspiration pneumonia and arrhythmia) between 3 and 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study show that MMF treatment significantly decreases the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in SPK transplant recipients compared with AZA-treated historical controls. In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control.     

A study comparing mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cell-Cept) is a potent and selective inhibitor of B and T lymphocyte proliferation that has proven effective in reducing the incidence of acute rejection in cadaveric kidney transplant recipients in several randomized, blinded clinical studies. Because the frequency and characteristics of rejection episodes may be different and more severe after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, we hypothesized that MMF would have a significant impact on pancreas-kidney rejection and graft outcome. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of MMF versus azathioprine (AZA) in cyclosporine-treated simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. METHODS: A retrospective comparison of 358 consecutive primary SPK transplantations performed from 1990 to 1997 was conducted. Patients received either MMF (n=109, 3 g/day) or AZA (n=249, 2 mg/kg q.d.) in combination with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. All patients received a quadruple-drug sequential induction protocol with either OKT3 or Atgam. Several outcome parameters, including patient and graft survival rates and frequency of rejection, were analyzed. RESULTS: MMF-treated patients demonstrated a markedly reduced rate of biopsy-proven kidney rejection (31 vs. 75% AZA, P=0.0001), clinically significant pancreas rejection (7 vs. 24% AZA; P=0.003), and steroid-refractory rejection (15 vs. 52% AZA; P=0.01). As a result, kidney and pancreas allograft survival was significantly better in MMF patients compared with AZA patients (2-year survival rates: kidney, 95 vs. 86%; and pancreas, 95 vs. 83%). Although surgical infections after transplantation were more frequent in MMF patients, MMF patients were more likely to have undergone enteric drainage. Importantly, we did not observe an increased incidence of any of the bacterial, fungal, or viral infections that typically plague immunosuppressed transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study demonstrates that MMF is a highly effective immunosuppressant in SPK transplantation. It is not associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections when a balanced immunosuppressive management approach is used. MMF strikingly reduces the frequency of acute cellular and steroid-resistant rejection. As a result of this combined experience, it is not unexpected then that we observe significantly improved graft survival rates in MMF-treated SPK patients compared with patients receiving a more traditional immunosuppressive regimen.     

Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. METHODS: Patients with preformed reactive antibodies < 500% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age > or = 40 years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time > or = 24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. RESULTS: delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (24%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159+/-59 micromol/1. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.     

Oculoplastic surgery with a contact Nd:YAG laser silica scalpel. A case report

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local immunosuppression with intraportal administration of cyclosporine (CsA) in liver transplantation. Mongrel dogs weighing 12-18kg were used. Orthotopic liver transplantation was performed, and animals were divided to the following groups. Group I (n = 7): no treatment, group II (n = 7): CsA 5mg/kg/day intermittent iv, group III (n = 5): CsA 3mg/kg/day continuous iv and group IV (n = 8): CsA 3mg/kg/day continuous portal infusion. Immunosuppressive treatments were carried out for two weeks postransplant. Median survival time (MST) of group IV was significantly prolonged (MST = 18 days, range 10-85 days; p < 0.025) compared with group I (7 days, range 6-13), group II (10 days, range 7-16) and group III (7 days, range 6-10). Data of blood chemical analyses showed that hepatic dysfunction was significantly diminished in group IV compared with other groups (p < 0.05). Blood concentration of CsA on the 5th day (mean +/- SEM) was significantly lower in group IV (238 +/- 22ng/ml) than in group III (438 +/- 113ng/ml). Histologic findings showed that rejection reaction was effectively suppressed in group IV, although SG2M% (mean +/- SEM) of peripheral mononuclear cells of group IV (10.6 +/- 3.3%) was equal to that of group III (11.3 +/- 1.7%). In conclusion, local immunosuppression could achieve prominent effect in preventing hepatic graft rejection with limited systemic immunosuppression.     

Prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection using FTY720 in combination with subtherapeutic doses of cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: In rodent transplant models, FTY720 exerts a synergistic affect with cyclosporine (CsA) to prolong allograft survival. The present experiments sought to test this combination in subhuman primates. METHODS: Cynomolgus monkeys were transplanted with kidney allografts that were incompatible in mixed lymphocyte culture reactions. The animals were treated with daily intramuscular injections of CsA using doses selected to maintain whole blood trough concentrations at therapeutic values between 40 and 200 ng/ml. The 4 experimental groups included CsA without or with 0.1, 0.3, or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 delivered daily by intravenous bolus injection. Therapeutic effects were suggested both by the graft histology of biopsy within the first 10 posttransplant days and by the length of host survival. RESULTS: Whereas recipients treated with CsA alone rejected kidney allografts at a median survival time of 8.5 days (n=4), those treated with either 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 in addition to CsA showed significant prolongation of kidney allograft survival to 71 days (n=3; P<0.04) or 63 days (n=5; P<0.05), respectively. The hosts in the 1.0 mg/kg/day FTY720 group survived 48 days, with 2 of 5 recipients succumbing at 9 or 17 days postgraft, suggesting possible complications caused by overimmunosuppression. Biopsies of the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group on posttransplant day 7 documented mild to moderate rejection (grade I), indicated by multiple focal areas of tubular destruction. The histology results of transplants in the 0.3 or 1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed only minimal interstitial inflammatory infiltrates (borderline grade), with no evidence of tubular or arterial damage. Serum creatinine values among the animals in the 0.1 mg/kg/day FTY720 group showed increases in 2 of 3 recipients by day 20 and in the third by day 41 postgraft. Among the 0.3 mg/kg/day FTY720 group, 3 of 5 recipients maintained baseline creatinine values to 45 days postgraft; 1 recipient had stable kidney function for 120 days postgraft. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of FTY720 therapy to a subtherapeutic CsA immunosuppressive regimen delays the rejection of renal allografts in subhuman primates.     

Inhibitory effect of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii on coronary arteriosclerosis after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND: Graft coronary arteriosclerosis (GCA) is the major limiting factor for long-term survival after heart transplantation. In this study, we investigated the effect of Multiglycosidorum tripterygii (MT) on GCA and platelet-derived growth factor A (PDGF-A) mRNA expression of transplanted hearts. METHODS: Two groups of Lewis rats (n=7/group) underwent heterotopic heart transplantation from Wistar-King donors and were treated with either cyclosporine (CsA;10 mg/kg/day) or MT (30 mg/kg/ day). Histological evaluations of rejection and coronary arteriosclerosis, as well as Northern blot analysis on graft PDGF-A mRNA expression were made 60 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Morphometric results indicated no significant difference in rejection between the CsA- and MT-treated groups. However, the extent of GCA in the MT-treated group was significantly less than that seen in the CsA-treated group (P<0.01). The expression of PDGF-A mRNA of cardiac allograft was also significantly suppressed in the MT-treated group when compared with the CsA-treated group (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: MT is superior to CsA in preventing graft coronary arteriosclerosis, and this efficacy is probably associated with the depressed expression of graft PDGF-A mRNA in the MT-treated group.     

Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: The long-term complications of immunosuppressive therapy such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are a major source of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study we completely withdrew prednisone (PRED) 14 days after liver transplantation in an effort to decrease these metabolic complications. Patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral formulation) or tacrolimus (TAC). Thus, we also were able to compare CsA to TAC in patients not receiving PRED with respect to efficacy, toxicity, and effect on posttransplant metabolic complications. METHODS: A total of 71 patients were randomized to receive either TAC-MMF (n=35) or CsA-MMF (n=36) after liver transplantation and were analyzed for patient and graft survival. Fifty-eight patients continued the immunosuppressive protocol for at least 6 months after transplantation and were analyzed for the incidence of acute rejection and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: The 6-month patient survival rates were 94.4% for CsA-MMF and 88.6% for TAC-MMF. Corresponding 6-month graft survival rates were 88.7% and 85.71% with no immunologic graft losses in either group. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 46% for CsA-MMF and 42.3% for TAC-MMF. Six patients were converted from CsA to TAC (four for recurrent rejection) and seven patients were converted from TAC to CsA (four for neurotoxicity). Only one patient (in the TAC-MMF group) developed new-onset posttransplant diabetes. In contrast, four of eight patients in the CsA-MMF group who were diabetic before transplant became nondiabetic in the first 3 months after transplant. The mean serum cholesterol level was significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (145.2+/-41.8 mg/dl and 190.3+/-62.2, respectively; P<0.001) and the incidence of hypertension was lower in the TAC-MMF group (12% vs. 30.3% in the CsA-MMF group, P<0.01). Both groups had a lower incidence of metabolic complications compared with a historical group (n=100) maintained on CsA and PRED (10 mg/day at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: MMF in combination with either TAC or CsA allows withdrawal of PRED 14 days after liver transplantation with a moderate rejection rate and no immunologic graft losses. Early PRED withdrawal decreases posttransplant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, but patients maintained on TAC have lower serum cholesterol levels and a lower incidence of hypertension than CsA-treated patients.     

Automated information system for controlling the sociopsychological adaptation of junior grade schoolchildren during learning activities

Acute graft rejection and delayed function are considered to be the major risk factors of short-term as well as long-term graft survival. We studied the impact of these factors on graft outcome among 109 renal transplant recipients. All recipients were treated with triple drug protocol. The recipients were divided into two groups: I group included 57 patients with delayed graft function (DGF), II group included 52 patients with immediate graft function (IGF). We studied graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, serum creatinine levels and the cause of graft loss for patients in both groups. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 49% of patients from DGF group and 45% of patients from IGF group. Graft survival in IGF group was better than in DGF group. Actuarial graft survival at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years in examined groups was 84%, 82%, 72%, 65% vs. 92%, 86%, 84%, 84%, respectively. One-year graft survival in patients with acute rejection from DGF group and IGF group was significantly lower than in patients who remained rejection free (69%, 74% vs. 94%, 96%). We concluded that delayed graft function decreases long-term graft survival, while immediate graft function has an excellent impact on graft outcome. Acute graft rejection is the strongest risk factor of graft loss.     

Steroid withdrawal from long-term immunosuppression in liver allograft recipients

Corticosteroids were withdrawn from the immunosuppressive regimen of 168/197 (85%) of liver transplant patients who survived for more than three months. In 14, steroids were restarted for reasons other than rejection. The remaining 154 patients were evaluated for the occurrence of rejection and graft loss. Risk factors for the development of rejection after steroid withdrawal were assessed. There were 13 episodes of rejection in 12 (7.8%) grafts; 7 (4.5%) experienced acute cellular rejection, and 6 (3.9%) developed chronic ductopenic rejection. All cases of acute rejection resolved with high-dose steroids. Graft and patient loss due to chronic rejection was 3 (1.9%) and 2 (1.3%), respectively. Chronic rejection resolved in 1 patient, 1 was successfully retransplanted, and in the other 2 the principal cause of death was recurrent tumor. None of the risk factors examined (primary indication for transplant, severity of previous acute rejection, use of OKT3, retransplantation, ABO blood group donor/recipient match, CMV infection, and CsA mono versus CsA and AZA double therapy) were associated with the development of chronic rejection poststeroid withdrawal. The prevalence of side effects, after steroid withdrawal, was low; 66% of patients never required antihypertensive medication; 14% experienced a significant septic episode, and only 4 died with sepsis as the major factor. There were no fungal sepsis and no new cases of diabetes. Withdrawal of corticosteroids after 3 months can be successfully achieved in the majority of liver allograft recipients and is associated with a low rate of rejection, graft loss, and complications attributable to immunosuppressive medication.     

Immunosuppressants decrease neutrophil chemoattractant and attenuate ischemia/reperfusion injury of the liver in rats

BACKGROUND: Neutrophils may play an important role in the development of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. We investigated the effects of the immunosuppressants azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus (FK506), and rapamycin (RPM) on the expression of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC) after ischemia/reperfusion of the liver. METHODS: Liver ischemia was induced in male Wistar rats by occluding the portal vein with a microvascular clip for 30 minutes. Rats received two intramuscular injections of AZA (4 mg/kg), CsA (5 mg/kg), FK506 (0.5 mg/kg), or RPM (0.5 mg/kg) 3 and 24 hours before ischemia/reperfusion of the liver. RESULTS: Serum CINC concentrations in untreated animals increased, peaked 6 hours after reperfusion, and thereafter decreased gradually. Pretreatment with AZA, CsA, FK506, and RPM, however, inhibited the increase in serum CINC concentrations after reperfusion. CINC mRNA in liver tissue increased and peaked 3 hours after reperfusion, but was significantly lower in animals treated with AZA, CsA, FK506, and RPM. In vitro CINC production by Kupffer cells harvested from animals treated with AZA, CsA, FK506, or RPM 3 hours after reperfusion was also significantly lower than that observed in untreated animals. Both myeloperoxidase activity and the number of neutrophils accumulating in the liver 24 hours after reperfusion in animals treated with AZA, CsA, FK506, and RPM were significantly lower than in untreated animals. This correlated with lower serum aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase levels in animals treated with AZA, CsA, FK506, and RPM 24 hours after reperfusion. CONCLUSION: The immunosuppressants AZA, CsA, FK506, and RPM reduce neutrophil accumulation and attenuate ischemia/reperfusion injury of the liver.     

Acute schistosomiasis: report on five singular cases

BACKGROUND: It is commonly believed that abnormal blood glucose levels indicate irreversible rejection. We were interested in determining the stage at which rejection remains reversible. METHODS: A total of 54 Lewis rats were rendered diabetic with 55 mg/kg streptozocin and were then given a pancreas transplant from Brown Norway donors. Pancreatic juice was collected in a subcutaneous reservoir. All recipients received 15 mg/kg cyclosporine A (CsA) for 5 days. CsA was then discontinued for 2 days (n=7, group 1), 4 days (n=7, group 2), 6 days (n=9, group 3), 8 days (n=9, group 4), 9 days (n=11, group 5), and 10 days (n=11, group 6). Two animals of each group were euthanized at the end of the immunosuppressive-free interval, for histological assessment of the grade of rejection (G0, GI, GII, GIII). Rejection was treated with methylprednisolone (7 mg/kg body weight) and CsA (15 mg/kg body weight). The volume of pancreatic juice, together with juice cytology (C0, CI, CII) and blood glucose levels, was assessed daily. RESULTS: Blood glucose remained normal throughout the observation period in animals with GI and GII rejection. The numbers of animals that became diabetic were as follows: 5 of 9 (group 4), 7 of 11 (group 5), and 8 of 11 (group 6). Decreased amounts of pancreatic juice were observed in all animals, except those in group 1. The histology returned to normal after anti-rejection therapy in four animals (57%) of group 1, in two animals (28%) of group 2, and in one animal (11%) of groups 3 and 4, respectively. Although there was no animal in groups 5 and 6 with normal graft histology after treatment, there were still four (36%) and three (27%) animals, respectively, that were normoglycemic and that had pancreatic grafts with well-preserved islets. CONCLUSIONS: From these data, we conclude that even GIII rejection with severe endothelialitis and isleitis can be reversed. Therefore, we suggest that a trial of enhanced immunosuppression is justified in patients with advanced pancreas allograft rejection.     

A randomized trial comparing cyclosporine induction with sequential therapy in renal transplant recipients

Calcium antagonists may reduce the nephrotoxicity of cyclosporine (CsA), allowing CsA to be introduced immediately after renal transplantation and thereby obviating the need for sequential induction therapy with a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody. To test this hypothesis, in a pilot feasibility trial 100 cadaveric or one-haplotype-mismatched living-related renal transplant recipients were randomized to either (1) sequential therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (ATGAM; Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI) 20 mg/kg/d for 7 to 14 days until renal function was established and CsA (Sandimmune; Sandoz, East Hanover, NJ) was started, or (2) CsA 8 mg/kg/d begun immediately before surgery with diltiazem (Cardizem; Marion Merrell Dow, Kansas City, MO) 60 mg sustained release twice daily. Acute rejection episodes during the first 90 days were not different with ATG versus CsA induction (42% v 28%; P = 0.142 by chi-square analysis). Graft failures (10% v 16%; P = 0.372) and the incidence of delayed graft function (28% v 34%; P = 0.516) were also similar with ATG compared with CsA. ATG caused lower platelet counts (138 +/- 59 x 10(3) v 197 +/- 75 x 10(3) at 7 days; P < 0.001) and lower white blood cell counts (9.6 +/- 4.6 x 10(3) v 12.3 +/- 4.9 x 10(3) at 7 days; P = 0.003). Diltiazem reduced the dose of CsA required to maintain target blood levels (479 +/- 189 mg/d v 576 +/- 178 mg/d at 14 days; P = 0.015). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in serum creatinine levels at days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 28, 60, or 90. The results of this pilot feasibility trial suggest that prophylactic treatment with CsA and diltiazem may be equally effective and less toxic than ATG induction after renal transplantation.     

CsA levels in the early posttransplant period--predictive of chronic rejection in liver transplantation?

The increasing success of clinical liver transplantation has brought rejection to the forefront as a cause of morbidity and graft loss. The relationship of immunosuppressive drug doses and levels to acute and chronic rejection remains a matter of debate. The effect of blood CsA levels and drug doses on the incidence of acute and chronic rejection and the impact of acute rejection episodes on the occurrence of chronic rejection were studied in 146 grafts in 132 patients. These patients were transplanted in the 4-year period from June 1989 using CsA-based immunosuppression (CsA, azathioprine, prednisolone). Liver grafts in patients maintained on median CsA levels (whole blood, trough level) of > or = 175 micrograms/L in the first 28 days posttransplant had a significantly lower incidence of chronic rejection (2 out of 49 vs. 22 out of 97; P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in incidence of graft loss due to fatal sepsis (6% vs. 5%) or nephrotoxicity between the high and low CsA level groups. The overall graft loss rate was lower in the higher CsA level group (22% vs. 37%). The total doses of the individual drugs did not correlate with the incidence of acute or chronic rejection. Although the occurrence of acute rejection itself did not determine later chronic rejection, late occurrence (P < 0.00001) and multiple episodes (two or more; P = 0.0002) of acute rejection were significant risk factors for the occurrence of chronic rejection. We conclude that to minimize graft loss to rejection, CsA levels should be maintained at greater than 175 micrograms/L in the early posttransplant period, and late and recurrent episodes of acute rejection should be prevented.     

Localization of Six4/AREC3 in the developing mouse retina; implications in mammalian retinal development

BACKGROUND: We designed an antisense phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide (oligo) to specifically inhibit the expression of rat intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) mRNA (IP-9125). METHODS: IP-9125 oligo was delivered intravenously by osmotic pump alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to recipients in order to prevent the rejection of kidney or heart allografts. In additional experiments, kidney allografts were perfused with IP-9125 before grafting. RESULTS: IP-9125 inhibited ICAM-1 mRNA and ICAM-1 protein expression in rat aortic endothelial cells; scrambled controls IP-12140 and IP-13944 were ineffective. Untreated ACI (RT1a) recipients rejected Lewis (RT1l) kidney allografts at a mean survival time of 8.5+/-1.1 days. A 14-day intravenous administration of 2.5 mg/kg/day IP-9125 prolonged the survival of kidney allografts to 39.2+/-16.4 days; 5.0 mg/kg/day, to 43.0+/-17.5 days; and 10.0 mg/kg/day, to 50.4+/-21.6 days. In contrast, a scrambled control IP-12140 was not effective. A combination of 10 mg/kg/day IP-9125 and 1.0 mg/kg/day CsA delivered for 14 days synergistically extended kidney allograft survival times 88.5+/-7.5 days. In contrast, the combination of 10.0 mg/kg/day control IP-12140 with CsA was ineffective (20.7+/-3.2 days) when compared with CsA alone (20.2+/-4.0 days). Similar results were obtained for heart transplants in recipients treated with IP-9125 alone or in combination with CsA. Furthermore, in situ immunostaining showed that IP-9125 significantly reduced the expression of ICAM-1 protein in kidney allografts. Finally, perfusion of kidney grafts alone with 20.0 mg per 2 ml of IP-9125 protected kidney allografts from rejection (37.5+/-7.5 days; P < 0.001), whereas perfusion with 20 mg per 2 ml of control IP-12140 was ineffective (12.6+/-5.0 days). CONCLUSIONS: Rat ICAM-1 IP-9125 oligo inhibits ICAM-1 protein expression in vitro and in vivo as well as blocks allograft rejection when used for pretreatment of donors, graft perfusion, or postoperative treatment of recipients.     

Effects of vesnarinone, a novel orally active inotropic agent with an immunosuppressive action, on experimental cardiac transplantation in rats

BACKGROUND: Vesnarinone (VES) has been used for treatment of patients with congestive heart failure. In addition to inotropic effects, it seems to have immunosuppressive action. We tested the hypothesis that VES suppresses graft rejection, inotropic dysfunction caused by early rejection, and chronic coronary obstruction in a heterotopic rat cardiac transplantation model. METHODS: (1) To study acute rejection, hearts from Lewis-Brown Norway (LBN) rats were transplanted into Lewis rats, which were treated with or without VES (50 or 100 mg/kg/day orally). (2) In a functional study, LBN hearts with or without VES (100 mg/kg/ day) were isolated and perfused on day 3 after transplantation to assess inotropic response to isoproterenol (3 x 10(-8) M). (3) To study chronic rejection, Lewis hearts were transplanted into Fisher 344 rats, which were treated with or without VES (50 mg/kg/day) for 90 days. Coronary obstructive disease was assessed by morphometric analysis. There were five to six animals in each group. RESULTS: (1) VES (100 mg/kg/day) prolonged LBN heart survival (11.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 9.6 +/- 0.7 days in control; P < 0.05). (2) Left ventricular developed pressure was depressed in transplanted hearts regardless of VES treatment (84 +/- 12, 90 +/- 8 vs. 144 +/- 16 mmHg in untransplanted hearts; P < 0.01). The developed pressure after administration of isoproterenol in VES-treated hearts (184 +/- 20 mmHg) was higher than transplanted hearts without VES (118 +/- 16 mmHg; P < 0.05), and similar to untransplanted hearts (203 +/- 27 mmHg; P = NS). (3) Transplanted hearts treated with or without VES showed similar grades of rejection (2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.2; P = NS), intimal area (6,996 +/- 3,186 vs. 13,441 +/- 5,165 microns2; NS), and coronary luminal obstruction (45 +/- 16% vs. 67 +/- 14%; NS). CONCLUSIONS: VES produces mild prolongation in survival of rat heart grafts, but has no significant effect on chronic graft atherosclerosis. VES preserves the positive inotropic effects of isoproterenol that are otherwise deteriorated by early acute rejection.     

Angiotensin II receptor antagonist TCV-116 reduces graft coronary artery disease and preserves graft status in a murine model. A comparative study with captopril

BACKGROUND: Despite the current progress in immunosuppressive regimens, the incidence of graft coronary artery disease (CAD) after cardiac transplantation has not decreased. Recent study has revealed that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition decreases CAD in rats; however, it is not clear whether this beneficial effect of ACE inhibition is due to a decrease in production of angiotensin II (Ang II) or inhibition of bradykinin degradation. To determine whether Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) blockade has an inhibitory effect on CAD, we evaluated the effects of TCV-116, an AT1-R antagonist, in a murine model of cardiac transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hearts of DBA/2 mice (H-2d) were transplanted heterotopically to B10.D2 mice (H-2d). Recipients were treated orally with TCV-116 (10 mg/kg per day), captopril (100 mg/kg per day), or vehicle only. Graft status, as assessed by palpation and inspection at laparotomy 70 days after transplantation, was preserved better in the TCV-116-treated group (P < .005) and in the captopril-treated group (P < .05) than in the vehicle-treated group. Intimal area in the graft coronary arterial wall decreased to 31% in the TCV-116-treated group (P < .001 versus vehicle-treated group) and to 34% (P < .005) in the captopril-treated group but was 45% in the vehicle-treated group. Fibrotic lesions of the left ventricle were less prominent in the TCV-116-treated (31%; P < .01 versus vehicle-treated group) and captopril-treated groups (33%; P < .05) than in the vehicle-treated group (54%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that AT1-R blockade is at least as effective as ACE inhibition in management of chronic allograft rejection and suggest that Ang II may play an important role in chronic allograft rejection.     

The Nordic multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid in liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been reported to reduce the incidence of acute rejection after liver transplantation compared with historical controls. We investigated this in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study. METHODS: Fifty-four liver transplant patients were allocated to the UDCA treatment group (15 mg/kg/day), and 48 patients were allocated to the placebo group. Trial medicine was started on the first postoperative day and was given for 3 months. Follow-up was for 12 months. Treatment was stratified for adults with chronic liver disease (n=77), adults with acute liver failure (n=10), and children (n=15). RESULTS: The frequency of patients with acute rejection was 65% in the UDCA treatment group and 68% in the placebo group. The frequency of steroid-resistant rejection was similar in both groups. The probability of acute rejection, analyzed according to the intention-to-treat policy with Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found in patient survival and graft survival probabilities. For the biochemical markers of cholestasis, only gamma-glutamyltransferase was significantly improved after 2 months of UDCA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The initial optimistic report of a beneficial effect of prophylactic treatment with UDCA on acute rejection after liver transplantation was not confirmed in this controlled study.