Impact of nocturnal hypoglycemia on hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction in type 1 diabetes

To test the hypothesis that glycemic thresholds for cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycemia, like those for autonomic and symptomatic responses, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), 15 patients were studied on two occasions. Cognitive functions were assessed during morning hyperinsulinemic stepped hypoglycemic clamps (85, 75, 65, 55, and 45 mg/dl steps) after, in random sequence, nocturnal (2330-0300) hypoglycemia (48 +/- 2 mg/dl) on one occasion and nocturnal euglycemia (109 +/- 1 mg/dl) on the other. Compared with nondiabetic control subjects (n = 12), patients with T1DM had absent glucagon (P = 0.0009) and reduced epinephrine (P = 0.0010), norepinephrine (P = 0.0001), and neurogenic symptom (P = 0.0480) responses to hypoglycemia; the epinephrine (P = 0.0460) and neurogenic symptom (P = 0.0480) responses were reduced further after nocturnal hypoglycemia. After nocturnal hypoglycemia, in contrast to nocturnal euglycemia, there was less deterioration of cognitive function overall (P = 0.0065) during hypoglycemia based on analysis of the sum of standardized scores (z-scores). There was relative preservation of measures of pattern recognition and memory (the delayed non-match to sample task, P = 0.0371) and of attention (the Stroop arrow-word task, P = 0.0395), but not of measures of information processing (the paced serial addition task) or declarative memory (the delayed paragraph recall task), after nocturnal hypoglycemia. Thus, glycemic thresholds for hypoglycemic cognitive dysfunction, like those for autonomic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia, shift to lower plasma glucose concentrations after recent antecedent hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.     

Preservation of physiological responses to hypoglycemia 2 days after antecedent hypoglycemia in patients with IDDM

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of short-term antecedent hypoglycemia on responses to further hypoglycemia 2 days later in patients with IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied eight type I diabetic patients without hypoglycemia unawareness or autonomic neuropathy during two periods at least 4 weeks apart. On day 1, 2 h of either clamped hyperinsulinemic (60 mU.m-2.min-1) hypoglycemia at 2.8 mmol/l or euglycemia at 5.0 mmol/l were induced. Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia was induced 2 days later with 40 min glucose steps of 5.0, 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5 mmol/l. Catecholamine levels and symptomatic and physiological responses were measured every 10-20 min. RESULTS: When compared with the responses measured following euglycemia, the responses of norepinephrine 2 days after hypoglycemia were reduced (peak, 1.4 +/- 0.4 [mean +/- SE] vs.1.0 +/- 0.3 nmol/l [P < 0.05]; threshold, 3.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l glucose [P < 0.01]). The responses of epinephrine (peak, 4.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.8 nmol/l [P = 0.84]; threshold, 3.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/l glucose [P = 0.38]), water loss (peak, 194 +/- 34 vs. 179 +/- 47 g-1.m-2.h-1 [P = 0.73]; threshold, 2.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol/l glucose [P = 0.90]), tremor (peak, 0.28 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.06 root mean square volts (RMS V) [P = 0.19]; threshold, 3.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l glucose [P = 0.70]), total symptom scores (peak, 10.6 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.8 +/- 1.9 [P = 0.95]; threshold, 3.3 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.6 +/0 0.1 mmol/l glucose [P = 0.15]), and cognitive function (four-choice reaction time: threshold, 2.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.2 mmol/l glucose [P = 0.69]) were unaffected. CONCLUSIONS: The effect on hypoglycemic physiological responses of 2 h of experimental hypoglycemia lasts for 1-2 days in these patients with IDDM . The pathophysiological effect of antecedent hypoglycemia may be of shorter duration in IDDM patients, compared with nondiabetic subjects.     

Reduced beta-adrenergic sensitivity in patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that impaired tissue sensitivity to catecholamines contributes to hypoglycemia unawareness in subjects with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 21 subjects with type 1 diabetes underwent a standardized insulin infusion protocol to produce a stepwise decrease in plasma glucose to 45-min plateaus of 4.3, 3.6, 3.0, and 2.3 mmol/l. Glycemic thresholds, maximum responses for adrenergic and neuroglycopenic symptoms, and counterregulatory hormones were determined. Patients were classified as hypoglycemia unaware if the initiation of adrenergic symptoms occurred at a plasma glucose level 2 SD below that of nondiabetic volunteers. beta-Adrenergic sensitivity was measured as the dose of isoproterenol required to produce an increment in heart rate of 25 beats per minute above baseline (I25) in resting subjects. RESULTS: Subjects with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness experienced the onset of adrenergic symptoms at a lower plasma glucose level than did those with awareness (2.5+/-0.1 vs. 3.7+/-0.1 mmol/l, P < 0.001), whereas neuroglycopenic symptoms occurred at similar glucose levels (2.7+/-0.2 vs. 2.8+/- 0.1 mmol/l). The plasma glucose levels for counterregulatory hormone secretion (epinephrine 2.9+/-0.2 vs. 4.1+/-0.2 mmol/l; norepinephrine 2.7+/-0.1 vs. 3.2+/-0.2 mmol/l; cortisol 2.5+/-0.2 vs. 3.3+/-0.2 mmol/l, P < 0.01) were also lower in subjects with unawareness. The maximal epinephrine (1,954+/-486 vs. 5,332+/- 1,059 pmol/l, P < 0.01), norepinephrine (0.73 +/- 0.14 vs. 1.47+/-0.21 nmol/l, P = 0.04), and cortisol (276+/-110 vs. 579+/-83 nmol/l, P < 0.01) responses were reduced in the unaware group. I25 was greater in unaware subjects than in subjects without unawareness (1.5+/-0.3 vs. 0.8+/-0.2 microg), where I25 was not different from that of controls (0.8 +/-0.2 microg). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that subjects with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemia unawareness have reduced beta-adrenergic sensitivity, which may contribute to their impaired adrenergic warning symptoms during hypoglycemia.     

Decreased epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia during sleep

BACKGROUND: In patients with type I diabetes mellitus, hypoglycemia occurs commonly during sleep and is frequently asymptomatic. This raises the question of whether sleep is associated with reduced counterregulatory-hormone responses to hypoglycemia. METHODS: We studied the counterregulatory-hormone responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in eight adolescent patients with type I diabetes and six age-matched normal subjects when they were awake during the day, asleep at night, and awake at night. In each study, the plasma glucose concentration was stabilized for 60 minutes at approximately 100 mg per deciliter (5.6 mmol per liter) and then reduced to 50 mg per deciliter (2.8 mmol per liter) and maintained at that concentration for 40 minutes. Plasma free insulin, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone were measured frequently during each study. Sleep was monitored by polysomnography. RESULTS: The plasma glucose and free insulin concentrations were similar in both groups during all studies. During the studies when the subjects were asleep, no one was awakened during the hypoglycemic phase, but during the final 30 minutes of the studies when the subjects were awake both the patients with diabetes and the normal subjects had symptoms of hypoglycemia. In the patients with diabetes, plasma epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia were blunted when they were asleep (mean [+/-SE] peak plasma epinephrine concentration, 70+/-14 pg per milliliter [382+/-76 pmol per liter]; P=0.3 for the comparison with base line), as compared with when they were awake during the day or night (238+/-39 pg per milliliter [1299+/-213 pmol per liter] P=0.004 for the comparison with base line, and 296+/-60 pg per milliliter [1616+/-327 pmol per liter], P=0.004, respectively). The patients' plasma norepinephrine responses were also reduced during sleep, whereas their plasma cortisol concentrations did not increase and their plasma growth hormone concentrations increased slightly. The patterns of counterregulatory-hormone responses in the normal subjects were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Sleep impairs counterregulatory-hormone responses to hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes and normal subjects.     

Mixed meal tolerance test and reactive hypoglycemia

Twenty-six patients with symptoms suggestive of postprandial hypoglycemia were investigated by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). During the OGTT, symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred in 10 (38.5%). Nine of these 10 sugjects were given mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and symptomatic hypoglycemia failed to occur in any case. During the OGTT the nadir glucose was significantly lower than that during MMTT (44.1 +/- 1.5 vs. 77.3 +/- 4.8 mg/dl +/- SEM, respectively; p less than 0.0005). Serum insulin during MMTT peaked significantly earlier than during OGTT (46.7 +/- 7.3 vs. 86.7 +/- 11.7 minutes (SEM, respectively; p less than 0.0125). The early secretion of insulin during MMTT may explain the lack of symptomatic hypoglycemia in these patients. We conclude that reactive hypoglycemia, when tested by a more natural stimulus (such as mixed meal) rather than by OGTT, is uncommon.     

Effect of glycemic control on glucose counterregulation during hypoglycemia in NIDDM

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of glycemic control of NIDDM on counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia and compared the effect with that seen in patients with IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven subjects with NIDDM and eight age- and weight-matched control subjects and ten subjects with IDDM and ten age- and weight-matched control subjects were studied. All subjects underwent a stepped hypoglycemic-hyper-insulinemic clamp study during which plasma glucose levels were lowered in a stepwise manner from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l in steps of 0.6 mmol/l every 30 min. Counterregulatory hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucagon, ACTH, cortisol, and growth hormone [GH]) were measured, and a symptom survey was administered during the last 10 min of each 30-min interval. RESULTS: The threshold for release of epinephrine, norepinephrine, ACTH, and cortisol occurred at higher plasma glucose levels in NIDDM than in IDDM patients (P < 0.05-0.01). The glucose threshold for release of epinephrine and norepinephrine correlated with glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (P < 0.05-0.01). However, for a given level of glycemic control, the threshold for release of epinephrine and norepinephrine occurred at a higher glucose level in NIDDM versus IDDM patients (P < 0.05-0.01). At the nadir level of hypoglycemia, glucagon, ACTH, and cortisol levels were all higher in NIDDM compared with IDDM subjects, whereas GH levels were lower. CONCLUSIONS: Glycemic control alters counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia in NIDDM as has been previously reported in IDDM. However, at similar levels of glycemic control, NIDDM patients release counterregulatory hormones at a higher plasma glucose level than patients with IDDM. In addition, subjects with NIDDM maintain their glucagon response to hypoglycemia. These data suggest that patients with NIDDM may be at reduced risk of severe hypoglycemia when compared with a group of IDDM patients in similar glycemic control, thus providing a more favorable risk-benefit ratio for intensive diabetes therapy in NIDDM.     

Prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to hypoglycemia are reduced in well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Several pituitary hormones, including corticotropin (ACTH), growth hormone (GH), prolactin, and beta-endorphin (but not thyrotropin, follicle-stimulating hormone, or luteinizing hormone), are released in response to hypoglycemia in normal subjects. In patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), the degree of glycemic control is known to alter ACTH and GH responses to hypoglycemia. The current study was performed to examine the effect of glycemic control on prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to hypoglycemia in subjects with IDDM. We performed 3-hour stopped hypoglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies (12 pmol/kg/min) during which plasma glucose was decreased from 5.0 mmol/L to 2.2 mmol/L in steps of 0.6 mmol/L every 30 minutes in 20 subjects with uncomplicated IDDM (12 males and eight females; age, 26 +/- 2 years; IDDM duration, 10 +/- 1 years; body mass index, 23.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 10 healthy subjects (five males and five females aged 30 +/- 1 years). The 10 diabetic subjects in good glycemic control (mean hemoglobin A1 [HbA1], 7.5% +/- 0.3%; normal range, 5.4% to 7.4%) were compared with the 10 poorly controlled patients (mean HbA1, 12.6% +/- 0.5%; P < .001 v well-controlled diabetic group). During hypoglycemia, prolactin levels in the well-controlled diabetic group did not change (7 +/- 1 microgram/L at plasma glucose 5.0 mmol/L to 9 +/- 2 micrograms/L at plasma glucose 2.2 mmol/L), whereas prolactin levels increased markedly in the poorly controlled diabetic group (7 +/- 2 micrograms/L to 44 +/- 17 micrograms/L) and healthy volunteers (12 +/- 2 micrograms/L to 60 +/- 19 micrograms/L, P < .05 between IDDM groups). The plasma glucose threshold required for stimulation of prolactin secretion was 2.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in well-controlled IDDM, 3.0 +/- 0.4 mmol/L in poorly controlled IDDM, and 2.4 +/- 0.1 mmol/L in healthy subjects (P < .05 between IDDM groups). Responses in males and females were similar. The increase in beta-endorphin levels was also attenuated in well-controlled IDDM patients (4 +/- 1 pmol/L at plasma glucose 5.0 mmol/L to 11 +/- 4 pmol/L at plasma glucose 2.2 mmol/L) versus poorly controlled IDDM patients (5 +/- 1 pmol/L to 26 +/- 7 pmol/L) and healthy subjects (8 +/- 1 pmol/L to 56 +/- 13 pmol/L). The plasma glucose threshold required for stimulation of beta-endorphin release was again lower in well-controlled IDDM versus poorly controlled IDDM patients (2.2 +/- 0.1 v 3.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/L) and healthy subjects (2.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/L, P < .05 between IDDM groups). In conclusion, prolactin and beta-endorphin responses to a standardized hypoglycemic stimulus (plasma glucose, 2.2 mmol/L) are reduced and plasma glucose levels required to stimulate release of prolactin and beta-endorphin are lower in well-controlled IDDM compared with poorly controlled IDDM and healthy subjects. Thus, stress hormones not previously considered to have a primary role in plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia are affected by glycemic control, suggesting a more generalized alteration of hypothalamic-pituitary responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM patients with strict glycemic control.     

The use of tolbutamide-induced hypoglycemia to examine the intraislet role of insulin in mediating glucagon release in normal humans

Disruption of intraislet mechanisms could account for the impaired glucagon response to hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. However, in contrast to animals, there is conflicting evidence that such mechanisms operate in humans. We have used i.v. tolbutamide (T) (1.7 g bolus + 130 mg/h infusion) to create high portal insulin concentrations and compared this with equivalent hypoglycemia using an i.v. insulin infusion (I) (30 mU/m2 x min). Ten normal subjects underwent two hypoglycemic clamps; mean glucose; I (53 +/- 1 mg/dL); and T (53 +/- 1 mg/dL) (2.9 +/- 0.04 mmol/L vs. 2.9 +/- 0.05 mmol/L), held for 30 min. During hypoglycemia, mean peripheral insulin levels were greater with I (59 +/- 4 mU/L) than T (18 +/- 3 mU/L), P < 0.001. Calculated peak portal insulin concentrations were greater during T (282 +/- 28 mU/L) than I (78 +/- 4 mU/L), P < 0.00005. The demonstration of a reduced glucagon response during T-induced hypoglycemia (111 +/- 8 ng/L vs. 135 +/- 12 ng/L, P < 0.05) with higher portal insulin concentrations suggests that intraislet mechanisms may contribute to the release of glucagon during hypoglycemia in man.     

Effect of hypoglycemia on beta-adrenergic sensitivity in normal and type 1 diabetic subjects

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the potential role of reduced tissue sensitivity to catecholamines in the pathogenesis of hypoglycemia unawareness in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The effect of a single episode of hypoglycemia on beta-adrenergic sensitivity was studied in 10 type 1 diabetic patients with apparently normal awareness of hypoglycemia (age 29 +/- 5 years, diabetes duration 13 +/- 8 years, HbA1c 7.3 +/- 0.9%) and 10 age-matched healthy control subjects. Beta-adrenergic sensitivity was measured with the isoproterenol test after a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp and after a hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp. Beta-adrenergic sensitivity was expressed as the dose of intravenous isoproterenol that increased the heart rate by 25 beats/min (IC25). RESULTS: During hypoglycemia, diabetic subjects had an impaired plasma epinephrine response compared with that of the control subjects (16.7 +/- 5.0 vs. 40.1 +/- 6.8 ng/ml, P = 0.02). In control subjects, the IC25 was lower after hypoglycemia than after euglycemia (0.83 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.13 +/- 0.21 microg, P = 0.02) indicating an increase in beta-adrenergic sensitivity. In diabetic subjects, on the other hand, the IC25 was greater after hypoglycemia than after euglycemia (1.00 +/- 0.26 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.14 microg, P = 0.04), indicating a decrease in beta-adrenergic sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects, a single episode of hypoglycemia increases beta-adrenergic sensitivity. In diabetic subjects, in contrast, hypoglycemia reduces beta-adrenergic sensitivity. These results provide evidence that in type 1 diabetic patients, some maladaptation of tissue sensitivity to catecholamines contributes to the development of hypoglycemia unawareness. A unifying hypothesis is presented for the pathogenesis of hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetic patients incorporating the concepts of both a reduced catecholamine response and reduced adrenergic sensitivity     

Physiologic hyperinsulinemia enhances counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM

We evaluated the effect of physiologic hyperinsulinemia (plasma insulin 329 +/- 62 vs 687 +/- 62 pmol/L) on counterregulatory hormone responses in 8 IDDM subjects studied during a 2-hour hypoglycemic clamp study with an equivalent degree of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose 3.1 +/- 0.1 and 3.0 +/- 0.1 mmol/L, respectively). Plasma epinephrine levels were increased by 71% during the last 60 minutes of hypoglycemia in the high insulin study (840 +/- 180 vs 1440 +/- 310 pmol/L, respectively p = 0.006). In addition, plasma cortisol and norepinephrine were also increased in the high insulin study (by 19% and 24% respectively, p < 0.01, for both). Plasma growth hormone and glucagon concentrations were not altered by high dose insulin infusion. In spite of increased epinephrine secretion, the glucose infusion rate required to maintain glucose was 2-fold greater in the high insulin study, and there was greater suppression of lipolysis in that group. We conclude that hyperinsulinemia may enhance counterregulatory hormone secretion in IDDM.     

Renal lactate metabolism and gluconeogenesis during insulin-induced hypoglycemia

The contribution of gluconeogenic precursors to renal glucose production (RGP) during insulin-induced hypoglycemia was assessed in conscious dogs. Ten days after surgical placement of sampling catheters in the right and left renal veins and femoral artery and an infusion catheter in the left renal artery, systemic and renal glucose and glycerol kinetics were measured with peripheral infusions of [6-3H]glucose and [2-13C]glycerol. Renal blood flow was determined with a flowprobe, and the renal balance of lactate, alanine, and glycerol was calculated by arteriovenous difference. After baseline, six dogs received 2-h simultaneous infusions of peripheral insulin (4 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and left intrarenal [6,6-2H]dextrose (14 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) to achieve and maintain left renal normoglycemia during systemic hypoglycemia. Arterial glucose decreased from 5.3 +/- 0.1 to 2.2 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; insulin increased from 46 +/- 5 to 1,050 +/- 50 pmol/l; epinephrine, from 130 +/- 8 to 1,825 +/- 50 pg/ml; norepinephrine, from 129 +/- 6 to 387 +/- 15 pg/ml; and glucagon, from 52 +/- 2 to 156 +/- 12 pg/ml (all P < 0.01). RGP increased from 1.7 +/- 0.4 to 3.0 +/- 0.5 (left) and from 0.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.2 (right) micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P < 0.01). Whole-body glycerol appearance increased from 6.0 +/- 0.5 to 7.7 +/- 0.7 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)(P < 0.01); renal conversion of glycerol to glucose increased from 0.13 +/- 0.04 to 0.30 +/- 0.10 (left) and from 0.11 +/- 0.03 to 0.25 +/- 0.05 (right) micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), (P < 0.05). Net renal gluconeogenic precursor uptake increased from 1.5 +/- 0.4 to 5.0 +/- 0.4 (left) and from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 3.8 +/- 0.4 (right) micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P < 0.01). Renal lactate uptake could account for approximately 40% of postabsorptive RGP and for 60% of RGP during hypoglycemia. These results indicate that gluconeogenic precursor extraction by the kidney, particularly lactate, is stimulated by counterregulatory hormones and accounts for a significant fraction of the enhanced gluconeogenesis induced by hypoglycemia.     

Morphologic and cytochemical characteristics of blood cells from Hawaiian green turtles

Previous studies have shown that hypoglycemia may reduce counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia in healthy subjects and in patients with diabetes. The effect of hypoglycemia on the hormonal response to a nonhypoglycemic stimulus is uncertain. To test the hypothesis that the cortisol response to corticotropin (ACTH) infusion is independent of antecedent hypoglycemia, 10 healthy subjects received a standard ACTH infusion (0.25 mg Cosyntropin [Organon, West Orange, NJ] intravenously over 240 minutes) at 8:00 AM on day 1 and day 3 and a hypoglycemic insulin clamp study (1 mU/kg/min) at 8:00 AM on day 2. During the hypoglycemic clamp, plasma glucose decreased from 5.0 mmol/L to 2.8 mmol/L for two periods of 120 minutes (mean glucose, 2.9 +/- 0.03 and 2.8 +/- 0.02 mmol/L, respectively) separated by a 60-minute interval of euglycemia (mean glucose, 4.7 +/- 0.01 mmol/L). Seven subjects also had paired control studies in random order during which a 330-minute euglycemic clamp (mean glucose, 5.0 +/- 0.11 mmol/L) instead of a hypoglycemic clamp was performed on day 2. Basal ACTH (4.6 +/- 0.7 v 2.6 +/- 0.4 pmol/L, P < .02) and basal cortisol (435 +/- 46 v 317 +/- 40 nmol/L, P < .02) both decreased from day 1 to day 3 following intervening hypoglycemia. In contrast, with intervening euglycemia, neither basal ACTH (5.9 +/- 1.5 v 4.5 +/- 1.0 pmol/L) nor basal cortisol (340 +/- 38 v 318 +/- 60 nmol/L) were reduced significantly on day 3 compared with day 1. Following interval hypoglycemia, the area under the curve (AUC) for the cortisol response to successive ACTH infusions was increased (4,734 +/- 428 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 3] v 3,526 +/- 434 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 1], P < .01). The maximum incremental cortisol response was also significantly increased (805 +/- 63 nmol/L (day 3) v 583 +/- 58 nmol/L (day 1), P < .05). In contrast, the AUC for the cortisol response to successive ACTH infusions with interval euglycemia (3,402 +/- 345 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 3] v 3,709 +/- 391 nmol/L over 240 minutes [day 1] and the incremental cortisol response (702 +/- 62 nmol/L [day 3] v 592 +/- 85 nmol/L [day 1] were unchanged. Following exposure to intermittent hypoglycemia in healthy humans, fasting morning ACTH and cortisol levels are reduced and the incremental cortisol response to an infusion of ACTH is enhanced. The enhanced cortisol response to exogenous ACTH infusion after intervening hypoglycemia (but not intervening euglycemia) may reflect priming of the adrenal gland by endogenous ACTH produced during the hypoglycemia. These data suggest that adrenal function testing by exogenous ACTH administration is not impaired by prior exposure to hypoglycemia. Moreover, the reduced cortisol response to recurrent hypoglycemia in patients with well-controlled diabetes is not likely the result of impaired adrenal responsiveness.     

The influence of antenatal corticosteroids on hypoglycemia in newborn rats with intrauterine growth retardation

This study examines the effect of maternally injected glucocorticoid on the pattern of hypoglycemia exhibited by rat pups with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). The majority of surgical procedures designed to produce small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborns for biochemical studies were carried out on days 18 and 19 of gestation because of favorable vields of pups with IUGR at those operative days. At birth, normal controls showed a mean +/- SE plasma glucose value of 63 +/- 2 mg/dl; mean glucose for the group with IUGR was significantly lower at 43 +/- 2 mg/dl. There was a further decrease in the plasma glucose concentration of pups with IUGR at 2-4 hr of age, whereas values in the control littermates did not fall during this interval. Through the first 2 hr of neonatal life, 46% of the pups with IUGR exhibited plasma glucose values less than 40 mg/dl, whereas only 18% of the control littermates manifiested hypoglycemia. During the 2-4-hr interval, the incidence of hypoglycemia in animals with IUGR increased to 91%; however, the incidence in control remained at 18% from 2-4 hr and fell to 4% at 4-6 hr of age. At birth, the pups with IUGR had a lower mean liver weight compared to their control littermates, but glycogen concentration of liver was similar to the control mean +/- SE of 25.7 +/- 1.8 (IUGR = 22.2 +/- 1.3 mg/g wet weight). Total hepatic glycogen stores, however, were markedly lower in dysmature rat pups (IUGR = 2.96 +/- 0.17 mg; control = 7.23 +/- 0.43 mg). Concentrations of plasma glucose at birth of individual control and IUGR animals were found to correlate significantly (r = 0.64, p less than 0.001) with total liver glycogen content. The decline in plasma glucose values in pups with IUGR was not present in animals whose dams received glucocorticoid injection 24 and 48 hr before delivery. At 4-6 hr of age, for instance, the mean plasma glucose concentration in the corticoid-treated IUGR group (70.1 +/- 6.9 mg/dl) approximated that of the control group. Instead on the 91% incidence of hypoglycemia noted in the nontreated dysmature pups, an incidence of 55% was found at 2-4 hr of age in offspring of mothers given glucocorticoid. At 4-6 hr, the treated group showed an incidence of 18% compared to a 67% figure in the nontreated IUGR animals. The concentration of liver glycogen in these animals also differed in that the treated IUGR pups showed significantly higher values (26.9 +/- 1.7 mg/g wet weight, mean +/- SE) than nontreated progeny. It is concluded that antenatally administered corticosteroid influence the development of neonatal hypoglycemia in the dysmature rat pup and that the major effect is not at birth, but during the 2-4-hr period of neonatal life.     

Mass spectrometric characterization of nicked fragments of the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin

To test the hypothesis that hypoglycemia unawareness and impaired counterregulation are reversible after meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN), 21 patients (8 without DAN [DAN-]; 13 with DAN [DAN+]; of the latter, 7 had orthostatic hypotension [DAN+PH+] and 6 did not [DAN+PH-]) and 15 nondiabetic subjects were studied during stepped hypoglycemia (plateau plasma glucose decrements from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l) before and 6 months after prevention of hypoglycemia (intensive therapy). After 6 months, frequency of mild hypoglycemia decreased from approximately 20 to approximately 2 episodes/patient-month while HbA1c increased from 6.2 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.2% (P < 0.05). Responses of adrenaline improved more in DAN- patients (from 1.17 +/- 0.12 to 2.4 +/- 0.22 nmol/l) than in DAN+PH- (from 0.75 +/- 0.25 to 1.56 +/- 0.23 nmol/l) and DAN+PH+ patients (from 0.80 +/- 0.24 to 1.15 +/- 0.27 nmol/l, P < 0.05) but remained lower than in nondiabetic subjects (4.9 +/- 0.37 nmol/l, P < 0.05), whereas glycemic thresholds normalized only in DAN-, not DAN+. Autonomic symptoms of hypoglycemia improved but remained lower in DAN- (6.2 +/- 0.6) than in nondiabetic subjects (8.1 +/- 1.1) and lower in DAN+PH+ (4 +/- 0.8) than in DAN+PH- subjects (5.1 +/- 0.8, P < 0.05), whereas neuroglycopenic symptoms normalized (NS). Cognitive function deteriorated less before than after prevention of hypoglycemia (P < 0.05). Thus, intensive therapy with emphasis on preventing hypoglycemia reverses hypoglycemia unawareness in DAN+ patients despite marginal improvement of adrenaline responses, results in low frequency of hypoglycemia despite impaired counterregulation, and maintains HbA1c in the range of intensive therapy. We conclude that DAN, long IDDM duration per se, and antecedent recent hypoglycemia contribute to different extents to impaired adrenaline responses and hypoglycemia unawareness.     

Increased nonoxidative glucose metabolism in idiopathic reactive hypoglycemia

Idiopathic reactive hypoglycemia (IRH) is responsible for postprandial hypoglycemia. Normal insulin secretion and reduced response of glucagon to acute hypoglycemia, but mostly increased insulin sensitivity, represent the metabolic features of this syndrome- The present study has two aims: first, to investigate the fate of glucose utilization inside the cells to assess whether increased glucose disposal in IRH is due to the oxidative and/or nonoxidative pathway; and second, to evaluate glucagon response to prolonged insulin-induced hypoglycemia. In eight patients with IRH and eight normal (N) subjects, we performed two studies on different days: (1) 120-minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic (1.0 mU . kg-1 . min-1 regular human insulin) clamp associated with indirect calorimetry; and (2) 180-minute hypoglycemic (2.22 to 2.49 mmo/L achieved through 0.85 mU . kg-1 . min-1 intravenous [IV] regular human insulin) clamp. The results showed an increased insulin-mediated glucose uptake in IRH (9.10 +/- 0.19 v 6.78 +/- 0.18 mg kg-1 . min-1, P < .005). Glucose oxidation was similar in IRH subjects and controls both in basal conditions (1.39 +/- 0.16 v 1.42 +/- 0.15 mg . kg-1 . min-1 and during the clamp studies (2.57 +/- 0.21 v 2.78 +/- 0.26 mg . kg-1 . min-1. In contrast, nonoxidative glucose disposal was significantly higher in IRH than in N subjects (6.53 +/- 0.30 v 4.00 +/- 0.21 mg . kg-1 . min-1, P < .001). During insulinization, fat oxidation was reduced slightly more in IRH than in control subjects. During the hypoglycemic clamp, a significant (P < .01) increase in plasma glucagon concentrations was observed in normal subjects as compared with baseline, whereas no change occurred in IRH patients. In conclusion, in IRH: (1) increased insulin-mediated glucose disposal is due to the increase of nonoxidative glucose metabolism; and (2) glucagon secretion has been confirmed to be inadequate. The increase of insulin sensitivity associated with a deficiency in glucagon secretion can widely explain the occurrence of hypoglycemia in the late postprandial phase.     

Plasma lipoprotein distribution of apoC-III in normolipidemic and hypertriglyceridemic subjects: comparison of the apoC-III to apoE ratio in different lipoprotein fractions

In order to assess the relationship between plasma accumulation of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) and lipoprotein levels of apoC-III and apoE, we have measured apoC-III and apoE in lipoproteins separated according to size (by automated gel filtration chromatography) from plasma of normolipidemic subjects (plasma triglyceride (TG): 0.84 +/- 0.10 mmol/l; mean +/- SE, n = 8), and from type III (n = 8) and type IV (n = 8) hyperlipoproteinemic patients, matched for plasma TG (5.76 +/- 0.62 v 5.55 +/- 0.45 mmol/l, resp.). Total plasma apoC-III concentration was similar in type III and type IV patients (33.1 +/- 3.4 v 37.6 +/- 4.4 mg/dl, respectively), but was significantly increased compared to normolipidemic controls (10.0 +/- 1.0 mg/dl, P < 0.001). TRL apoC-III was lower and high density lipoprotein (HDL) apoC-III was significantly higher in type III versus type IV subjects (14.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 22.8 +/- 3.0 mg/dl, P < 0.05; 8.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 5.2 +/- 0.5 mg/dl, P < 0.05). Plasma concentration of apoC-III in lipoproteins that eluted between TRL and HDL (intermediate-sized lipoproteins, ISL) was similar in the two hypertriglyceridemic groups (10.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 9.7 +/- 1.6 mg/dl), but was significantly higher (P< 0.05) than controls (2.2 +/- 0.3 mg/dl). TRL, ISL, and HDL apoE concentrations were significantly higher in type III versus type IV subjects (P < 0.05). All lipoprotein fractions in type III patients were characterized by lower apoC-III to apoE ratios. In contrast, the TRL apoC-III to apoE ratio of type IV patients was similar and the ISL apoC-III to apoE ratio was significantly higher, compared to normolipidemic individuals. These results indicate that compared to normolipidemic individuals, remnant-like lipoproteins in the ISL fraction of type IV patients are enriched in apoC-III relative to apoE, whereas those of type III patients are enriched in apoE relative to apoC-III.     

Use of cholestyramine in the treatment of children with familial combined hyperlipidemia

We studied the effectiveness of and compliance with the use of cholestyramine in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). During a 10-year period, 673 children (aged 10.5 +/- 4.0 years) were referred for evaluation of hyperlipidemia, of whom 87 (36 with FH; 51 with FCHL) were treated with cholestyramine (8 to 24 gm/day). In both groups, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B levels were significantly reduced after cholestyramine use. In those with FH, plasma LDL-cholesterol levels decreased from 258 +/- 35 mg/dl (6.67 +/- 0.90 mmol/L) to 190 +/- 31 mg/dl (4.91 +/- 0.80 mmol/L); in those with FCHL, LDL-cholesterol levels dropped from 207 +/- 40 mg/dl (5.35 +/- 1.03 mmol/L) to 141 +/- 35 mg/dl (3.64 +/- 0.90 mmol/L). High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were not significantly changed after cholestyramine use in either group. In the FCHL group, plasma triglyceride levels increased significantly from 81 +/- 35 mg/dl (0.92 +/- 0.40 mmol/L) to 134 +/- 42 mg/dl (1.52 +/- 0.48 mmol/L). Seven patients were lost to follow-up; 18 discontinued the medication within 1 month. Of the remaining 62 children, 59 had a good response to the drug. Of the 62 patients, 52 discontinued the medication after 21.9 +/- 10 months. Adverse effects included foul taste (73%), nausea with bloating (18%), and constipation. Cholestyramine is effective in reducing LDL-cholesterol levels in children with inherited hyperlipidemia, but the majority of children will not comply with its long-term use.     

Counterregulation by epinephrine and glucagon during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in the conscious dog

We assessed the combined role of epinephrine and glucagon in regulating gluconeogenic precursor metabolism during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in the overnight-fasted, adrenalectomized, conscious dog. In paired studies (n = 5), insulin was infused intraportally at 5 mU.kg-1.min-1 for 3 h. Epinephrine was infused at a basal rate (B-EPI) or variable rate to simulate the normal epinephrine response to hypoglycemia (H-EPI), whereas in both groups the hypoglycemia-induced rise in cortisol was simulated by cortisol infusion. Plasma glucose fell to approximately 42 mg/dl in both groups. Glucagon failed to rise in B-EPI, but increased normally in H-EPI. Hepatic glucose release fell in B-EPI but increased in H-EPI. In B-EPI, the normal rise in lactate levels and net hepatic lactate uptake was prevented. Alanine and glycerol metabolism were similar in both groups. Since glucagon plays little role in regulating gluconeogenic precursor metabolism during 3 h of insulin-induced hypoglycemia, epinephrine must be responsible for increasing lactate release from muscle, but is minimally involved in the lipolytic response. In conclusion, a normal rise in epinephrine appears to be required to elicit an increase in glucagon during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in the dog. During insulin-induced hypoglycemia, epinephrine plays a major role in maintaining an elevated rate of glucose production, probably via muscle lactate release and hepatic lactate uptake.     

Troglitazone in combination with sulfonylurea restores glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Troglitazone Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the combination of troglitazone (a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activator) and sulfonylurea will provide efficacy not attainable by either medication alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 552 patients inadequately controlled on maximum doses of sulfonylurea who participated in a 52-week randomized active-controlled multicenter study. Patients were randomized to micronized glyburide 12 mg q.d. (G12); troglitazone monotherapy 200, 400, or 600 mg q.d. (T200, T400, T600); or combined troglitazone and glyburide q.d. (T200/G12, T400/G12, T600/G12). Efficacy measures included HbA1c, fasting serum glucose (FSG), insulin, and C-peptide. Effects on lipids and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Patients on T600/G12 had significantly lower mean (+/- SEM) FSG (9.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/l; 167.4 +/- 6.6 mg/dl) compared with control subjects (13.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l; 246.5 +/- 6.8 mg/dl; P < 0.0001) and significantly lower mean HbA1c (7.79 +/- 0.2 vs. 10.58 +/- 0.18%, P < 0.0001). Significant dose-related decreases were also seen with T200/G12 and T400/G12. Among patients on T600/G12, 60% achieved HbA1c < or =8%, 42% achieved HbA1c < or =7%, and 40% achieved FSG < or =7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl). Fasting insulin and C-peptide decreased with all treatments. Overall, triglycerides and free fatty acids decreased, whereas HDL cholesterol increased. LDL cholesterol increased slightly, with no change in apolipoprotein B. Adverse events were similar across treatments. Hypoglycemia occurred in 3% of T600/G 12 patients compared with <1% on G12 or troglitazone monotherapy CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea can be effectively managed with a combination of troglitazone and sulfonylurea that is safe, well tolerated, and represents a new approach to achieving the glycemic targets recommended by the American Diabetes Association.     

Primacy of liver glucosensors in the sympathetic response to progressive hypoglycemia

The impact of hepatic glucose concentration on the sympathetic response to progressive hypoglycemia was examined in chronically cannulated conscious male dogs (n = 6). Graded hypoglycemia was induced via peripheral insulin infusion (30 pmol.kg-1.min-1) with either peripheral (PER) or portal (POR) glucose infusion. Over the 260-min experimental period, arterial glycemia was adjusted from 5.2 +/- 0.1 to 2.5 +/- 0.1 mM in decrements of approximately 0.5 mM every 40 min. Arterial glycemias were not significantly different between PER and POR at any measured level. However, hepatic glycemia was significantly elevated at all times during POR (8.4 +/- 0.8 to 3.4 +/- 0.2 mM) when compared to PER (5.2 +/- 0.2 to 2.5 +/- 0.1 mM). Plasma epinephrine values were significantly greater during PER vs. POR at all arterial glycemias below 4.0 mM. At the lowest level of arterial glycemia studied (2.5 +/- 0.2 mM) the epinephrine response above basal was 3-fold greater for PER (8.7 +/- 1.7 nM) when compared to POR (2.6 +/- 0.6 nM) (P < 0.01). Plasma norepinephrine results were similar for the two protocols, with PER demonstrating a 3-fold greater response above basal when compared to POR at 2.5 mM arterial glycemia (P < 0.05). While the sympathetic response was markedly different between protocols when expressed as a function of arterial glycemia, when expressed as a function of hepatic glycemia this discrepancy was largely eliminated. This latter observation supports the liver as the primary locus for glycemic detection relevant to the sympathoadrenal response when hypoglycemia develops slowly--i.e., over a period of 2-3 h. A comparison of the current findings with our previous observations suggests that the hepatic glucosensors may play a greater role in hypoglycemic counterregulation as the rate of fall in glycemia is less.