Toughening of polyamide 11 via addition of crystallizable polyethylene derivatives

BACKGROUND: Conventional rubber‐like toughening modifiers are soft and amorphous, and when used to toughen polyamide 11 (PA11) they commonly induce a decrease in the tensile strength and modulus. In this study, crystallizable polyethylene (PE) derivatives, i.e. linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) and maleic anhydride‐grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), were adopted to toughen PA11. RESULTS: Compared to pure PA11, a highest improvement by a factor of eight in the impact toughness was achieved; also, the tensile strength and modulus could be maintained at a relatively high level. PE‐g‐MA acted as a compatibilizer for PA11 and LLDPE, bringing strong interfacial adherence, and especially a domain‐in‐domain morphology observed in PA11/PE‐g‐MA/LLDPE (70/10/20 by weight) blends. The observation that PA11 was toughened by the crystallizable PE derivatives is discussed in depth, based on the combined effect of surface crystallization of LLDPE on pre‐formed PA11 crystallites and interfacial compatiblization between PA11 and PE‐g‐MA. CONCLUSION: The crystallizable PE derivatives LLDPE and PE‐g‐MA were shown to be effective toughening modifiers for the proportions PA11/PE‐g‐MA/LLDPE 70/10/20 (by weight), which is considered to be an optimum composition: special domain‐in‐domain morphology was observed indicating a good dispersion of PE in the PA11 matrix and strong interfacial adherence between PE phase and PA11 phase. The reason why strength and modulus were maintained at a high level in the as‐prepared blends was attributed to the existence of rigid crystalline domains in PE. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of blending sequence on the morphology and properties of polyamide 6/EPDM‐g‐MA/epoxy blends

The ternary blends of polyamide 6/maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber/epoxy (PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/EP) were prepared by a twin‐screw extruder with four different blending sequences. With the variation of blending sequence, the ternary blends presented distinct morphology and mechanical properties because of different interactions induced by various reactive orders. The addition of epoxy could increase the viscosity of the PA6 matrix, but a considerably larger size of the dispersed rubber phase was observed while first preblending PA6 with epoxy followed by blending a premix of PA6/EP with EDPM‐g‐MA, which was attested by rheological behaviors and SEM observations. It was probably ascribed to the fact that the great increase of the interfacial tension between the matrix and rubber phase aroused a great coalescence of rubber particles. The presence of epoxy in the rubber phase reduced the rubber's ability to cavitate so that the toughening efficiency of the EPDM‐g‐MA was decreased. The results of mechanical testing revealed that the optimum blending sequence to achieve balanced mechanical properties is blending PA6, EPDM‐g‐MA, and epoxy simultaneously in which the detrimental reactions might be effectively suppressed. In addition, thermal properties were investigated by TG and DSC, and the results showed that there was no distinct difference. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 12 blends with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene rubbers with and without maleation

Blends of polyamide 12 (PA12) with styrene/ethylene–butylene/styrene (SEBS) and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA) were prepared by twin‐screw extrusion and injection molding. The morphology, mechanical properties, and dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were studied. The morphology of the blends was evaluated from the etched surfaces of cryogenically fractured specimens with scanning electron microscopy. The morphological parameters showed that the PA12/SEBS‐g‐MA blends (PM series) exhibited a finer and more uniform rubber dispersion than the PA12/SEBS blends (PS series) because of the interfacial chemical reactions. SEBS functionalization via maleic anhydride grafting strongly affected the morphological parameters, such as the domain size, interfacial area per unit of volume, and critical interparticle distance, but the distribution of the rubber domains in the blends was less affected. Tensile and impact studies showed that the PS blends had worse mechanical properties than the PM blends. The tensile strength and elongation at break of the PM blends were considerably greater than those of the PS blends. The fracture toughness and energy values determined for notched Charpy specimens in high‐speed impact tests were markedly higher for the PM blends than for the PS blends. A similar observation was obtained from instrumented falling weight impact studies. Dynamic mechanical analysis confirmed the incompatibility of the blend components because the glass‐transition temperatures of PA12 and the rubber phase (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) were not affected. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl polym Sci 95: 1376–1387, 2005     

Toughening and compatibilization of polyphenylene sulfide/nylon 66 blends with SEBS and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS triblock copolymers

In this study, styrene‐b‐ethylene/butylene‐b‐styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS) and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA) were used as compatibilizers for the blends of polyphenylene sulfide/nylon 66 (PPS/PA66). The mechanical properties, including impact and tensile properties and morphology of the blends, were investigated by mechanical properties measurements and scanning electron microscopy. Impact measurements indicated that the impact strength of the blends increases slowly with elastomer (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) content upto 20 wt %; thereafter, it increases sharply with increasing elastomer content. The impact energy of the elastomer‐compatibilized PPS/PA66 blends exceeded that of pure nylon 66, implying that the nylon 66 can be further toughened by the incorporation of brittle PPS minor phase in the presence of SEBS or SEBS‐g‐MA. The compatibilization efficiency of SEBS‐g‐MA for nylon‐rich PPS/PA66 was found to be higher than SEBS due to the in situ forming SEBS interphase between PPS and nylon 66. The correlation between the impact property and morphology of the SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilized PPS/PA66 blends is discussed. The excellent impact strength of the nylon‐rich blends resulted from shield yielding of the matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Fabrication of polypropylene blends with excellent low‐temperature toughness and balanced toughness‐rigidity by a combination of EPR and SEEPS

To overcome serious rigidity depression of rubber‐toughened plastics and fabricate a rigidity‐toughness balanced thermoplastic, a combination of styrene‐[ethylene‐(ethylene‐propylene)]‐styrene block copolymer (SEEPS) and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) was used to toughen polypropylene. The dynamic mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behavior, and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/EPR/SEEPS blends were studied in detail. The results show that the combination of SEEPS and EPR can achieve the tremendous improvement of low‐temperature toughness without significant strength and rigidity loss. Dynamic mechanical properties and phase morphology results demonstrate that there is a good interfacial strength and increased loss of compound rubber phase comprised of EPR component and EP domain of SEEPS. Compared with PP/EPR binary blends, although neither glass transition temperature (T_g) of the rubber phase nor T_g of PP matrix in PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, the brittle‐tough transition temperature (T_bd) of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, indicating that the increased interfacial interaction between PP matrix and compound rubber phase is also an effective approach to decrease T_bd of the blends so as to improve low‐temperature toughness. The balance between rigidity and toughness of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends is ascribed to the synergistic effect of EPR and SEEPS on toughening PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45714.     

Effect of in situ synthesized macroactivator on morphology of PA6/PS blends via successive polymerization

In situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization was adopted for preparation of ternary PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends by means of successive polymerization of styrene, with TMI and ε‐caprolactam, via free radical copolymerization and anionic ring‐opening polymerization, respectively. Copolymer poly(St‐g‐TMI), the chain of which bears isocyanate (? NCO), acts as a macroactivator to initiate PA6 chain growth from the PS chain and graft copolymer of PS‐g‐PA6 and pure PA6 form, simultaneously. The effect of the macroactivator poly(St‐g‐TMI) on the phase morphology was investigated in detail, using scanning electron microscopy. In case of blends with higher content of PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer, copolymer nanoparticles coexisting with the PS formed the matrix, in which PA6 microspheres were dispersed evenly as minor phase. The content of the compositions (homopolystyrene, homopolyamide 6, and PS‐g‐PA6) of the blends were determined by selective solvent extraction technique. The mechanical properties of PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends were better than that of PA6/PS blends. Especially for the blends T10 with lower PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer content, both the flexural strength and flexural modulus showed significantly improving because of the improved interfacial adhesion between PS and PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Effect of core‐shell morphology evolution on the rheology,crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE ternary blend

In this article, polyamide 6 (PA6), maleic anhydride grafted ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer (EPDM‐g‐MA), high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) were simultaneously added into an internal mixer to melt‐mixing for different periods. The relationship between morphology and rheological behaviors, crystallization, mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blends were studied. The phase morphology observation revealed that PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE (70/15/15 wt %) blend is constituted from PA6 matrix in which is dispersed core‐shell droplets of HDPE core encapsulated by EPDM‐g‐MA phase and indicated that the mixing time played a crucial role on the evolution of the core‐shell morphology. Rheological measurement manifested that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of ternary blends were notable higher than the pure polymer blends and binary blends which ascribed different phase morphology. Moreover, the maximum notched impact strength of PA6/EPDM‐g‐MA/HDPE blend was 80.7 KJ/m² and this value was 10–11 times higher than that of pure PA6. Particularly, differential scanning calorimetry results indicated that the bulk crystallization temperature of HDPE (114.6°C) was partly weakened and a new crystallization peak appeared at a lower temperature of around 102.2°C as a result of co‐crystal of HDPE and EPDM‐g‐MA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Synergetic toughness and morphology of poly(propylene)/nylon 11/maleated ethylene‐propylene diene copolymer blends

Polypropylene (PP)/nylon 11/maleated ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM‐g‐MAH) ternary polymer blends were prepared via melt blending in a corotating twin‐screw extruder. The effect of nylon 11 and EPDM‐g‐MAH on the phase morphology and mechanical properties was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy observation revealed that there was apparent phase separation for PP/EPDM‐g‐MAH binary blends at the level of 10 wt % maleated elastomer. For the PP/nylon 11/EPDM‐g‐MAH ternary blends, the dispersed phase morphology of the maleated elastomer was hardly affected by the addition of nylon 11, whereas the reduced dispersed phase domains of nylon 11 were observed with the increasing maleated elastomer loading. Furthermore, a core‐shell structure, in which nylon 11 as a rigid core was surrounded by a soft EPDM‐g‐MAH shell, was formed in the case of 10 wt % nylon 11 and higher EPDM‐g‐MAH concentration. In general, the results of mechanical property measurement showed that the ternary blends exhibited inferior tensile strength in comparison with the PP matrix, but superior toughness. Especially low‐temperature impact strength was obtained. The toughening mechanism was discussed with reference to the phase morphology. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Interfacial slip‐stick transition induced by reactive compatibilization in ethylene‐co‐butyl acrylate elastomer dispersed polyamide 6 blend subjected to high shear flow and extensional flow

The effect of phase interaction induced by reactive compatibilization during high shear and extensional flow in polyamide (PA6) and ethylene‐co‐butyl acrylate (EBA) blends was studied using advanced dual bore capillary rheometer. The viscosity‐composition behavior of the uncompatibilized PA6/EBA blends exhibited negative deviation behavior from log‐additivity rule. The interfacial slip mechanism, operative between the matrix PA6 and dispersed EBA during shear flow was studied by the use of Lin's and Bousmina‐Palierne‐Utracki (BPU) model for viscosity for the blends under the processing conditions. On the other hand, the compatibilized PA6/EBA‐g‐MAH^0.49/EBA blends with varying dispersed phase volume fraction show positive deviation behavior. The reactive compatibilizers EBA‐g‐MAH^0.49 and EBA‐g‐MAH^0.96 increased the phase interaction with adequate reduction in the dynamic interfacial tension, which favored the particle break‐up and stabilized the morphology in the compatibilized blends. The extensional viscosity of the blends has enhanced because of the inclusion of EBA in all the uncompatibilized and compatibilized blends. The melt elasticity and elasticity function were systematically studied from first normal stress coefficient functions (ψ₁). The variation in the recoverable shear strain (γ_R), shear rate dependent relaxation time (λ) and shear compliance (J_c) under various shear rates were thoroughly analyzed for all the blend compositions. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide‐6/K resin blends

Mechanical properties and morphological studies of compatibilized blends of polyamide‐6 (PA‐6)/K resin grafted with maleic anhydride (K‐g‐MAH) and PA‐6/K resin/K‐g‐MAH were investigated as functions of K resin/K‐g‐MAH and dispersed phase K resin concentrations, and all the blends were prepared using twin screw extruder followed by injection molding. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to assess the fracture surface morphology and the dispersion of the K resin in PA‐6 continuous phase, the results showing extensive deformation in presence of K‐g‐MAH, whereas, uncompatibilized PA‐6/K resin blends show dislodging of K resin domains from the PA‐6 matrix. Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) test reveals the partially miscibility of PA‐6 with K‐g‐MAH, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results further identified that the introduction of K‐g‐MAH greatly improved the miscibility between PA‐6 and K resin. The mechanical properties of PA‐6/K resin blends and K‐g‐MAH were studied through bending, tensile, and impact properties. The Izod notch impact strength of PA‐6/K‐g‐MAH blends increase with the addition of K‐g‐MAH, when the K‐g‐MAH content adds up to 20 wt %, the impact strength is as more than 6.2 times as pure PA‐6, and accompanied with small decrease in the tensile and bending strength less than 12.9% and 17.5%, respectively. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Rubber‐toughened PLA blends with low thermal expansion

In this study, poly (lactic acid) (PLA) blended with various rubber components, i.e., poly (ethylene‐glycidyl methacrylate) (EGMA), maleic anhydride grafted poly(styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene) triblock elastomer (m‐SEBS), and poly(ethylene‐co‐octene) (EOR), was investigated. It was observed that EGMA is highly compatible due to its reaction with PLA. m‐SEBS is less compatible with PLA and EOR is incompatible with PLA. Electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) revealed that a fine co‐continuous microlayer structure is formed in the injection‐molded PLA/EGMA blends. This leads to polymer blends with high toughness and very low linear thermal expansion both in the flow direction and in the transverse direction. The microlayer thickness of rubber in PLA blends was found to play key roles in reducing the linear thermal expansion and achieving high toughness of the blends. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 toughened by maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers: Mechanical properties,morphology, and rheology

Poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)/polyamide 6 (PPO/PA6 30/70) blends were impact modified by addition of three kinds of maleated polystyrene‐based copolymers, i.e., maleated styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), maleated methyl methacrylate‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (MBS‐g‐MA), and maleated acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA). The mechanical properties, morphology and rheological behavior of the impact modified PPO/PA6 blends were investigated. The selective location of the maleated copolymers in one phase or at interface accounted for the different toughening effects of the maleated copolymer, which is closely related to their molecular structure and composition. SEBS‐g‐MA was uniformly dispersed in PPO phase and greatly toughened PPO/PA6 blends even at low temperature. MBS‐g‐MA particles were mainly dispersed in the PA6 phase and around the PPO phase, resulting in a significant enhancement of the notched Izod impact strength of PPO/PA6 blends from 45 J/m to 281 J/m at the MBS‐g‐MA content of 20 phr. In comparison, the ABS‐g‐MA was mainly dispersed in PA6 phase without much influencing the original mechanical properties of the PPO/PA6 blend. The different molecule structure and selective location of the maleated copolymers in the blends were reflected by the change of rheological behavior as well. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

The role of polycarbonate molecular weight in the poly(L‐lactide) blends compatibilized with poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L‐lactate)

Poly(butylene succinate‐co‐L ‐lactate) (PBSL)–compatibilized poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) polymer blends with two commercial grades of polycarbonate (PC) were investigated. The capillary tests showed that the steady shear viscosity of high molecular weight PC (PC‐L) was 10 times higher than that of low molecular weight PC (PC‐AD) throughout the shear rate range under investigation. Morphologic examination revealed that the shape of the dispersed PC‐L phase in the as‐extruded blends was largely spherical, but the PC‐AD phase was more like a rod and elongated further during injection molding. Notched Izod impact strength (IS) of the unmodified PLLA/PC‐L blend was higher than that of PC‐AD blend. The IS of modified ternary blends increased with PBSL content because of enhanced phase interaction indicated from thermal and morphologic analysis. The PBSL modification also enhanced IS more significantly in PLLA/PC‐L than in PLLA/PC‐AD blends. On the contrary, the heat deflection temperature (HDT) of PLLA/PC‐L binary system was much lower than that of PLLA/PC‐AD. HDT of PBSL‐modified PLLA/PC‐AD blends dropped with increasing PBSL content, which is a ductile polymer. Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of the ternary blends showed that individual components were immiscible with distinct T_gs for PC and PLLA and distinct T_ms for PBSL and PLLA. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2013. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of maleated styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene on the morphology and mechanical and thermal properties of polystyrene/polyamide 1212 blends

Polystyrene (PS)/polyamide 1212 (PA 1212) blends were compatibilized with a maleated triblock copolymer of styrene–(ethylene‐co‐butene)–styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA was beneficial to the dispersion of PA 1212 in the PS matrix because of the reaction between them. The variation of the fraction of SEBS‐g‐MA in the blends allowed the manipulation of the phase structure, which first formed a sheetlike structure and then formed a cocontinuous phase containing PA 1212/SEBS‐g‐MA core–shell morphologies. As a result, the mechanical properties, especially the Charpy notched impact resistance, were significantly improved with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MA. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data indicated that the strong interaction between SEBS‐g‐MA and PA 1212 in the blends retarded the crystallization of PA 1212. The heat distortion temperature of the compatibilized blends was improved in comparison with that of the unmodified blend, probably because of the apparent increase in the glass‐transition temperature with an increasing concentration of SEBS‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 95: 1354–1360, 2005     

Blends of polyamide1010 with unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐grafted high‐impact polystyrene

The crystallization behaviors, dynamic mechanical properties, tensile, and morphology features of polyamide1010 (PA1010) blends with the high‐impact polystyrene (HIPS) were examined at a wide composition range. Both unmodified and maleic‐anhydride‐(MA)‐grafted HIPS (HIPS‐g‐MA) were used. It was found that the domain size of HIPS‐g‐MA was much smaller than that of HIPS at the same compositions in the blends. The mechanical performances of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA blends were enhanced much more than that of PA1010–HIPS blends. The crystallization temperature of PA1010 shifted towards higher temperature as HIPS‐g‐MA increased from 20 to 50% in the blends. For the blends with a dispersed PA phase (≤35 wt %), the T_c of PA1010 shifted towards lower temperature, from 178 to 83°C. An additional transition was detected at a temperature located between the T_g's of PA1010 and PS. It was associated with the interphase relaxation peak. Its intensity increased with increasing content of PA1010, and the maximum occurred at the composition of PA1010–HIPS‐g‐MA 80/20. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 857–865, 1999     

Compatibilizing effect of starch‐grafted‐poly(L‐lactide) on the poly(ε‐caprolactone)/starch composites

The poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL)/starch blends were prepared with a coextruder by using the starch grafted PLLA copolymer (St‐g‐PLLA) as compatibilizers. The thermal, mechanical, thermo‐mechanical, and morphological characterizations were performed to show the better performance of these blends compared with the virgin PCL/starch blend without the compatibilizer. Interfacial adhesion between PCL matrix and starch dispersion phases dominated by the compatibilizing effects of the St‐g‐PLLA copolymers was significantly improved. Mechanical and other physical properties were correlated with the compatibilizing effect of the St‐g‐PLLA copolymer. With the addition of starch acted as rigid filler, the Young's modulus of the PCL/starch blends with or without compatibilizer all increased, and the strength and elongation were decreased compared with pure PCL. Whereas when St‐g‐PLLA added into the blend, starch and PCL, the properties of the blends were improved markedly. The 50/50 composite of PCL/starch compatibilized by 10% St‐g‐PLLA gave a tensile strength of 16.6 MPa and Young's modulus of 996 MPa, respectively, vs. 8.0 MPa and 597 MPa, respectively, for the simple 50/50 blend of PCL/starch. At the same time, the storage modulus of compatibilized blends improved to 2940 MPa. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Effect of extruder type on the properties and morphology of reactive blends based on polyamides

The morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide-based blends prepared in single and corotating twin-screw extruders were compared using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. Reactive polyamide blends with SEBS-g-MA (a maleated styrenic triblock copolymer with ethylene–butvlene midblocks), EPR-g-MA (a maleated ethylene/propylene rubber), and ABS were selected for the purpose of this investigation. For blends of SEBS-g-MA with difunctional (nylon x,y) polyamides (e.g., nylon 6,6; nylon 12,12), the twin-screw extruder was more effective in producing a finer dispersion of the rubber phase, which resulted in a significant lowering of the ductile–brittle transition temperature in case of the nylon 6,6 blend. On the other hand, blends of SEBS-g-MA with the mono-functional nylon 6 material led to rubber particles that were too small for toughening for both extruder types employed in this work. For nylon 6/EPR-g-MA blends, the single-screw extruder led to blends with excellent low-temperature impact properties for both single-step and masterbatch mixing techniques, whereas nylon 6/EPR-g-MA blends prepared in a single-step operation in the twin-screw extruder were brittle under ambient conditions. For difunctional polyamide blends with ABS (compatibilized with an imidized acrylic polymer), the morphology and mechanical properties were found to be independent of the extruder type employed for processing. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Influence of epoxy resin on the properties of maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer toughened polyamide 6 blends

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS‐g‐MA) was used as an impact modifier of polyamide 6 (PA6). Epoxy resin was introduced into PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends to further improve their properties. Notched Izod impact tests showed that the impact strength of PA6/ABS‐g‐MA could be improved from 253 to 800 J/m with the addition of epoxy resin when the ABS‐g‐MA content was set at 25 wt %. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the addition of epoxy resin made the crystallization temperature and melting temperature shift to lower temperatures; this indicated the decrease in the PA6 crystallization ability. Dynamic mechanical analysis testing showed that the addition of epoxy resin induced the glass‐transition temperature of PA6 and the styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile copolymer phase to shift to higher temperatures due to the chemical reactions between PA6, ABS‐g‐MA, and epoxy resin. The scanning electron microscopy results indicated that the ABS‐g‐MA copolymer dispersed into the PA6 matrix uniformly and that the phase morphology of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends did not change with the addition of the epoxy resin. Transmission electron microscopy showed that the epoxy resin did not change the deformation mechanisms of the PA6/ABS‐g‐MA blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of transfer film on tribological behavior of polyamide 66‐based binary and ternary nanocomposites

BACKGROUND: In a polymer–metal sliding system, the formation and performance of the transfer film have important effects on the tribological behavior of the polymer. In order to reveal the wear mechanism of polyamide 66 (PA 66) and its composites consisting of styrene–(ethylene/butylene)–styrene triblock rubber grafted with maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) particles and organoclay nano‐layers, the tribological behavior and transfer films of polyamide 66 and its composites were investigated under dry sliding. RESULTS: The incorporation of SEBS‐g‐MA rubber particles reduces the wear mass loss of PA 66, while the addition of organoclay nano‐layers increases the wear mass loss. The transfer films formed by neat PA 66 and PA 66/organoclay binary nanocomposite include a dark portion and bright portion. In the dark portion, the transfer film is thicker; in the bright portion, the steel ring surface is exposed. The transfer film formed by PA 66/SEBS‐g‐MA/organoclay ternary nanocomposite is thinner and more uniform than the transfer films formed by the other materials. CONCLUSION: When SEBS‐g‐MA rubber particles and organoclay nano‐layers are added simultaneously to PA 66, the wear resistance of PA 66 can be improved markedly. The main reason is that PA 66/SEBS‐g‐MA/organoclay ternary nanocomposite can form a thin and uniform transfer film on the steel ring surface. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Toughening of polyamide 6 with a maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer

Maleic anhydride functionalized acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS‐g‐MA) copolymers were prepared via an emulsion polymerization process. The ABS‐g‐MA copolymers were used to toughen polyamide 6 (PA‐6). Fourier transform infrared results show that the maleic anhydride (MA) grafted onto the polybutadiene phase of acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS). Rheological testing identified chemical reactions between PA‐6 and ABS‐g‐MA. Transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy displayed the compatibilization reactions between MA of ABS‐g‐MA and the amine and/or amide groups of PA‐6 chain ends, which improved the disperse morphology of the ABS‐g‐MA copolymers in the PA‐6 matrix. The blends compatibilized with ABS‐g‐MA exhibited notched impact strengths of more than 900 J/m. A 1 wt % concentration of MA in ABS‐g‐MA appeared sufficient to improve the impact properties and decreased the brittle–ductile transition temperature from 50 to 10°C. Scanning electron microscopy results show that the shear yielding of the PA‐6 matrix was the major toughening mechanism. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008