Miscibility and phase behavior in blends of phenolphthalein poly(ether sulfone) and poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A)

Miscibility and phase behavior in the blends of phenolphthalein poly(ether sulfone) (PES-C) with poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) (PH) were investigated by means of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), high resolution solid state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). It was found that the homogeneity of the as-prepared blends depended on the solvents used; N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) provided the segmental mixing for PH and PES-C, which is confirmed by the behavior of single, composition-dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). To examine the homogeneity of the blends at the molecular level, the proton spin-lattice relaxation times in the rotating frame T_1ρ(H) were measured via ¹³C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy as a function of blend composition. In view of the T_1ρ(H) values, it is concluded that the PH and PES-C chains are intimately mixed on the scale of 20-30 Å. FTIR studies indicate that there were the intermolecular specific interactions in this blends, involved with the hydrogen-bonding between the hydroxyls of PH and the carbonyls of PES-C, and the strength of the intermolecular hydrogen bonding is weaker than that of PH self-association. At higher temperature, the PH/PES-C blends underwent phase separation. By means of thermal analysis, the phase boundaries of the blends were determined, and the system displayed the lower critical solution temperature behavior. Thermogravity analysis (TGA) showed that the blends exhibited the improved thermal stability, which increases with increasing PES-C content.     

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) and its blends with poly(ethylene oxide): miscibility, phase behavior and hydrogen bonding interactions

Poly(hydroxyether sulfone) (PHES) was synthesized through polycondensation of bisphenol S with epichlorohydrin. It was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The miscibility in the blends of PHES with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) was established on the basis of the thermal analysis results. DSC showed that the PHES/PEO blends prepared by casting from N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) possessed single, composition-dependent glass transition temperatures (T_gs), indicating that the blends are miscible in amorphous state. At elevated temperatures, the PHES/PEO blends underwent phase separation. The phase behavior was investigated by optical microscope and the cloud point curve was determined. A typical lower critical solution temperature behavior was observed in the moderate temperature range for this blend system. FTIR studies indicate that there are the competitive hydrogen bonding interactions upon adding PEO to the system, which was involved with the intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, i.e. -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO between PHES and PEO. In terms of the infrared spectroscopic investigation, it is judged that from weak to strong the strength of the hydrogen bonding interactions is in the following order: -OH?OS, -OH?-OH and -OH versus ether oxygen atoms of PEO.     

Miscibility and interactions in blends and complexes of poly(4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole) with proton-donating polymers

The miscibility and interactions in blends and complexes of poly(4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole) (PMVT) with poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and poly(vinylphosphonic acid) (PVPA) were studied. PMVT formed complexes with PVPA but not with PVPh and PAA. Each of the blends of PMVT with PVPh and PAA showed a single glass transition temperature (T_g), indicating miscibility. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies provided the existence of interactions in the PMVT blends and complexes. The XPS studies indicated that the thiazole nitrogen atoms are involved in hydrogen-bonding interactions with PVPh and PAA, and ionic interactions with PVPA. The sulfur atoms of PMVT also interact with PVPh, PAA and PVPA.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(methylthiomethyl methacrylate) (PMTMA) is miscible with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) over the whole composition range as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature in each blend. The interaction between PMTMA and PVA was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The interactions mainly involve the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the thioether sulfur atoms of PMTMA, and the involvement of the carbonyl groups of PMTMA in interactions is not significant. The measurements of proton spin-lattice relaxation time reveal that PMTMA and PVA do not mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm, but are miscible on a scale of 20-30 nm. In comparison, we have previously found that PMTMA is miscible with poly(p-vinylphenol) and the two polymers mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm.     

Miscible blends of poly(vinyl phenyl ketone hydrogenated) and poly(styrene-co-4-vinylpyridine)

Miscibility behavior over a wide composition range was detected for polymer blends of poly(vinyl phenyl ketone hydrogenated) (PVPhKH) with poly(styrene-co-4-vinylpyridine) (PS-co-4VPy). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermo mechanical analysis (TMA) reveal that each composition has only one glass transition temperature. The variation of the glass transition temperature with composition for PVPhKH/PS-co-4VPy miscible blends follows the Gordon-Taylor equation. FTIR analysis of this binary system indicates the existence of hydrogen bonding between pyridine ring of PS-co-4VPy and hydroxyl groups insert into PVPhKH. This specific interaction has a decisive influence in the phase behavior of PVPhKH/PS-co-4VPy blends.     

Miscibility and hydrogen bonding in blends of poly(vinyl acetate) with phenolic resin

The miscibility of phenolic resin and poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends was investigated by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). This blend displays single glass transition temperature (T_g) over entire compositions indicating that this blend system is miscible in the amorphous phase due to the formation of hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl groups of phenolic resin and carbonyl groups of PVAc. Quantitative measurements on fraction of hydrogen-bonded carbonyl group using both ¹³C solid-state NMR and FT-IR analyses result in good agreement between these two spectroscopic techniques. According to the proton spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T_1ρ^H), the phenolic/PVAc blend is intimately mixed on a scale less than 2-3 nm. Furthermore, the inter-association equilibrium constant and its related enthalpy of phenolic/PVAc blends were determined as a function of temperatures by infrared spectra based on the Painter-Coleman association model.     

Miscibility and crystallization in crystalline/crystalline blends of poly(butylene succinate)/poly(ethylene oxide)

Miscibility and crystallization behavior have been investigated in blends of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSU) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both semicrystalline polymers, by differential scanning calorimetry and optical microscopy. Experimental results indicate that PBSU is miscible with PEO as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. In addition, the polymer-polymer interaction parameter, obtained from the melting depression of the high-T_m component PBSU using the Flory-Huggins equation, is composition dependent, and its value is always negative. This indicates that PBSU/PEO blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. The morphological study of the isothermal crystallization at 95 °C (where only PBSU crystallized) showed the similar crystallization behavior as in amorphous/crystalline blends. Much more attention has been paid to the crystallization and morphology of the low-T_m component PEO, which was studied through both one-step and two-step crystallization. It was found that the crystallization of PEO was affected clearly by the presence of the crystals of PBSU formed through different crystallization processes. The two components crystallized sequentially not simultaneously when the blends were quenched from the melt directly to 50 °C (one-step crystallization), and the PEO spherulites crystallized within the matrix of the crystals of the preexisted PBSU phase. Crystallization at 95 °C followed by quenching to 50 °C (two-step crystallization) also showed the similar crystallization behavior as in one-step crystallization. However, the radial growth rate of the PEO spherulites was reduced significantly in two-step crystallization than in one-step crystallization.     

Miscibility studies in blends of polybenzimidazoles and poly(4-vinyl pyridine)

Poly[2,2'-(m-phenylene)-5,5'-bibenzimidazole] (PBI) is shown to be miscible with poly(4-vinyl pyridine) over the entire composition range. Experiments were performed with commercial PBI as well as a lower molecular weight material synthesized by us. Blend miscibility is evidenced by single glass transition temperature intermediate between the pure polymers. Hydrogen bonding between the components was detected by infrared spectroscopy.     

Miscibility of C60-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(vinyl chloride)

The miscibility of blends of single [60]fullerene (C₆₀)-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEO) or double C₆₀-end-capped poly(ethylene oxide) (FPEOF) with poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) has been studied. Similar to poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), both FPEO and FPEOF are also miscible with PVC over the entire composition range. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed the development of a new low-binding-energy Cl2p doublet and a new high-binding-energy O1s peak in FPEO/PVC blends. The results show that the miscibility between FPEO and PVC arises from hydrogen bonding interaction between the α-hydrogen of PVC and the ether oxygen of FPEO. From the melting point depression of PEO, FPEO or FPEOF in the blends, the Flory-Huggins interaction parameters were found to be −0.169, −0.142, −0.093 for PVC/PEO, PVC/FPEO and PVC/FPEOF, respectively, demonstrating that all the three blend systems are miscible in the melt. However, the incorporation of C₆₀ slightly impairs the interaction between PEO and PVC.     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), both semicrystalline polymers, were prepared by co-dissolving the two polyesters in chloroform and casting the mixture. Phase contrast microscopy was used to probe the miscibility of PEOB/PCL blends. Experimental results indicated that PEO was immiscible with PCL because the melt was biphasic. Crystallization of PEO/PCL blends was studied by differential scanning calorimetry and analyzed by the Avrami equation. The crystallization rate of PEO decreased with the increase of PCL in the blends while the crystallization mechanism did not change. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of PCL, the crystallization mechanism did not change, and the change in the crystallization rate was not very big, or almost constant with the addition of PEO, compared with the change of the crystallization rate of PEO.     

Structure and mechanical properties of poly(sulfone of bisphenol A)/poly(butylene terephthalate) blends

Blends of poly(sulfone of bisphenol A) (PSU) with poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) were obtained by direct injection moulding across the composition range. The two components of the blends reacted slightly in the melt state, producing linear copolymers. The slight changes observed in the two glass transition temperatures indicate that the copolymers were present in the two amorphous phases of the blends. The observed reactions and the high viscosity of the matrix of the PSU‐rich compositions led to a very fine morphology which could not be attained in the PBT‐rich compositions due to the low viscosity of the matrix and the direct injection moulding procedure used. This procedure is fast and economically advantageous, but leads to poor mixing. The different morphologies influenced neither the modulus nor the yield stress, which tended to follow the rule of mixtures. However, the low fracture properties of the PBT‐rich compositions contrasted with the ductility behaviour, and even the impact strength of the PSU‐rich blends, which also tended to be proportional to the blend composition. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Miscibility and crystallization of poly(ethylene succinate)/poly(vinyl phenol) blends

Miscibility of biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) (PES)/poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) blends has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in this work. PES is found to be miscible with PVPh as shown by the existence of single composition dependent glass transition temperature over the entire composition range. Spherulitic morphology and the growth rates of neat and blended PES were investigated by optical microscopy (OM). Both neat and blended PES show a maximum growth rate value in the crystallization temperature range of 45-65 °C, with the growth rate of neat PES being higher than that of blended PES at the same crystallization temperature. The overall crystallization kinetics of neat and blended PES was also studied by DSC and analyzed by the Avrami equation at 60 and 65 °C. The crystallization rate decreases with increasing the temperature for both neat and blended PES. The crystallization rate of blended PES is lower than that of neat PES at the same crystallization temperature. However, the Avrami exponent n is almost the same despite the blend composition and crystallization temperature, indicating that the addition of PVPh does not change the crystallization mechanism of PES but only lowers the crystallization rate.     

The effect of prepolymer crystallinity on solid-state polymerization of poly(bisphenol A carbonate)

The effect of prepolymer crystallinity on the solid-state polymerization (SSP) of poly(bisphenol A carbonate) was examined using nitrogen as a sweep fluid. A low-molecular-weight prepolymer was synthesized by melt transesterification and prepolymers with different crystallinities (11.7%, 23.3%, 33.7%) were prepared with supercritical carbon dioxide treatment. SSP of the three prepolymers was then carried out at reaction temperatures in the range of 150-190 °C, with a prepolymer particle size of 75 μm and a N₂ flow rate of 1600 ml/min. The glass-transition temperature (T_g), absolute weight-average molecular weight (M_n), and percent crystallinity were measured at various times during each SSP. At each reaction temperature, SSP of the lower crystallinity prepolymer (11.7%) always resulted in higher-molecular-weight polymers, compared with the polymers synthesized using the higher crystallinity prepolymer (23.3% and 33.7%). The crystallinity of the polymers synthesized from the high crystallinity prepolymer was significantly higher than for those synthesized from the low crystallinity prepolymer. Higher crystallinity of the prepolymer and the synthesized polymers may lower the reaction rate by reducing chain-end mobility or/and by inhibiting byproduct diffusion.     

Miscibility and crystallisation behaviour of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends

Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends were produced in a twin-screw extruder with and without added transesterification catalyst, lanthanum acetyl acetonate. The miscibility of the blends was studied from their crystallisation behaviour and variation in glass transition temperature with composition using differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy and change in mechanical properties. The blends prepared without the catalyst showed completely immiscible over all compositions, while those prepared in the presence of the catalyst showed some limited miscible. The presence of PC inhibited the crystallisation of PET but this was much greater in the blends prepared in the presence of catalyst suggesting that some reaction had taken place between the two polyesters. The tensile properties showed little differences between the two types of blends.     

Miscibility and interactions in polystyrene and sodium sulfonated polystyrene with poly(vinyl methyl ether) PVME blends. Part II. FTIR

The miscibility and specific interactions of polystyrene (PS) and sodium sulfonated polystyrene (Na-SPS) with poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) blends (ranging from 10 to 90% PS by weight) were examined experimentally by FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR studies at different temperatures have shown that changes in spectra of polymer blends, as reported in the literature can be explained by temperature changes in pure homopolymers. This indicates that molecular interactions, which are responsible for miscibility, are not detectable by infrared absorptions and are therefore of unspecific strength and location. The FTIR of SPS/PVME blends show that sulfonate groups of PS affect polymer miscibility through changes in configuration of molecules, rather than through direct interaction with the PVME.     

Studies on the miscibility and phase structure in blends of poly(epichlorohydrin) and poly(vinyl acetate)

The miscibility of atactic poly(epichlorohydrin) (aPECH) with poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was examined under two different conditions: (i) in dilute solution, using vicometeric measurements and (ii) as cast films, using differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and FT-infrared spectroscopy. Phase separation on heating, i.e. lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior of the aPECH/PVAc blends was examined by the measurement of transmitted light intensity against temperature. From viscosity measurements, the Krigbaum-Wall polymer-polymer interaction (ΔB) was evaluated. The DSC results show that the aPECH/PVAc blends are miscible as evidenced by the observation of a single composition-dependent glass-transition temperature (T_g) which is well described by the Couchman and Gordon Taylor models. The Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ₁₂) calculated from the T_g-method was negative and equal to −0.01, indicating a relatively low interaction strength. The FT-IR results match very well with those of DSC. The cloud point phenomenon is thermodynamically driven but phase separation, once taken place, is diffusion controlled in normal accessible time.     

Miscibility and phase behavior in blends of poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) with poly(ethylene oxide-co-propylene oxide)

The miscibility of poly(hydroxyether of bisphenol A) (phenoxy) with a series of poly(ethylene oxide-co-propylene oxide) (EPO) has been studied. It was found that the critical copolymer composition for achieving miscibility with phenoxy around 60°C is about 22 mol % ethylene oxide (EO). Some blends undergo phase separation at elevated temperatures, but there is no maximum in the miscibility window. The mean-field approach has been used to describe this homopolymer/copolymer system. From the miscibility maps and the melting-point depression of the crystallizable component in the blends, the binary interaction energy densities, B_ij, have been calculated for all three pairs. The miscibility of phenoxy with EPO is considered to be caused mainly by the intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions between the hydroxyl groups of phenoxy and the ether oxygens of the EO units in the copolymers, while the intramolecular repulsion between EO and propylene oxide units in the copolymers contributes relatively little to the miscibility. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(n-propyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

Poly(n-propyl methacrylate) (PPMA) is miscible with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) over the whole composition range as shown by the existence of a single glass transition temperature in each blend. The interaction between PPMA and PVA was examined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The interactions mainly involve the hydroxyl groups of PVA and the carbonyl groups of PPMA. The measurements of proton spin-lattice relaxation time reveal that PPMA and PVA do not mix intimately on a scale of 1-3 nm, but are miscible on a scale of 20-30 nm. A small negative interaction parameter value has been obtained by melting point depression measurement.     

Miscibility with positive deviation in Tg-composition relationship in blends of poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(p-vinyl phenol)

Phase behavior and miscibility with positive deviation from linear T_g-composition relationship in a copolymer/homopolymer blend system, poly(2-vinyl pyridine)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP-b-PEO)/poly(p-vinyl phenol) (PVPh), were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid-state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C NMR), optical microscopy (OM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Optical and electron microscopy results as well as NMR proton spin-lattice relaxation times in laboratory frame () all confirmed the miscibility as judged by the T_g criterion using DSC. In comparison to the literature result on a homopolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP/PVPh, fitting with the Kwei equation on the T_g-composition relationship for the block-copolymer/homopolymer blend of P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend system yielded a smaller q value (q = 120) for P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh than that for P2VP/PVPh blend (q = 160). The FT-IR and ¹³C NMR results revealed hydrogen-bonding interactions between the pendant pyridine group of P2VP-b-PEO and phenol unit in PVPh, which is responsible for the noted positive deviation of the T_g-composition relationship. Comparison of the shifts of hydroxyl IR absorbance band, reflecting the average strength of H-bonding, indicates a decreasing order of P2VP/PVPh > P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh > PEO/PVPh blends. The PEO block in the copolymer segment tends to defray the interaction strength in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blends because of relative weaker interaction between PEO and PVPh than that between P2VP and PVPh pairs. A comparative ternary (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh blend was also studied as the controlling experiments for comparison to the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh blend. The thermal behavior and interaction strength in (P2VP/PEO)/PVPh ternary blends are discussed with those in the P2VP-b-PEO/PVPh copolymer/homopolymer blend.     

Miscibility and interactions in poly(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine)/poly(p-vinylphenol) blends

The miscibility and specific interactions in poly(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl methacrylate-co-4-vinylpyridine) (PFX, X=0, 28, 40 or 54, denoting the mol% of 4-vinylpyridine unit in the copolymer)/poly(p-vinylphenol) (PVPh) blends have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). DSC studies show that PF0 is immiscible with PVPh, and the presence of a sufficient amount of 4-vinylpyridine units in the copolymer produces miscible blends. AFM images also clearly show that the blends change from heterogeneous to homogeneous upon the incorporation of 4-vinylpyridine unit into the copolymer. FTIR and XPS show the existence of inter-polymer hydrogen bonding between PFX and PVPh. The intensity of the inter-polymer hydrogen bonding increases with increasing 4-vinylpyridine content in the copolymer.