Influence of interfacial structure on morphology and deformation behavior of SBS block copolymers

Linear styrene-block-butadiene-block-styrene (SBS) triblock copolymers having different interfacial structures were investigated. In spite of the nearly equivalent chemical composition (about 70 vol% of styrene), these copolymers show significantly different morphologies. It was shown that the origin of the modified morphology in asymmetric block copolymers is the intermixing of short polystyrene (PS) chains or chain segments into the polybutadiene (PB) phase. It has a consequence of an increase in the glass transition temperature of the soft phase (PB phase here) and a significant decrease of the whole relaxation time of the materials. The larger the interfacial volume, the more PS molecules can mix into the PB phase. Moreover, it seems that the extent of the stress transfer in heterogeneous polymeric systems is crucially influenced by the interface. The tapered interface in an SBS block copolymer, for example, permits a more effective stress transfer compared to the sharp interface resulting in a higher degree of orientation in the individual phases of the materials.     

Evolution of interphase in styrene-butadiene block copolymers as revealed by H solid-state NMR: Effect of temperature and molecular architecture

¹H spin-diffusion solid-state NMR, in combination with other techniques, was utilized to investigate the effect of molecular architecture and temperature on the interphase thickness and domain size in poly(styrene)-block-poly(butadiene) and poly(styrene)-block-poly(butadiene)-block-poly(styrene) copolymers (SB and SBS) over the temperature range from 25 to 80 °C. These two block copolymers contain equal PS weight fraction of 32 wt%, and especially, polystyrene (PS) and polybutadiene (PB) blocks are in glass and melt state, respectively, within the experimental temperature range. It was found that the domain sizes of the dispersed phase and interphase thicknesses in these two block copolymers increased with increasing temperature. Surprisingly we found that the interphase thicknesses in these two block copolymers were obviously different, which was inconsistent with the theoretical predictions about the evolution of interphase in block copolymer melts by self-consistent mean-field theory (SCFT). This implies that the interphase thickness not only depends strongly on the binary thermodynamic interaction (χ) between the PS and PB blocks, but also is influenced by their molecular architectures in the experimental temperature range.     

Micro‐ and macrophase separation of thermosetting systems modified with epoxidized styrene‐block‐butadiene‐ block‐styrene linear triblock copolymers and their influence on final mechanical properties

BACKGROUND: The goal of this work was to establish the minimum degree of epoxidation needed to develop nanostructured epoxy systems by modification with poly(styrene‐block‐butadiene‐block‐styrene) (SBS) triblock copolymers epoxidized to several degrees, and also to investigate the effect of polystyrene (PS) content on the final morphologies. By using two SBS copolymers, the influence of the weight ratio of the two blocks on the generated morphologies and mechanical properties was also analysed. RESULTS: Nanostructured thermosets were effectively obtained through reaction‐induced microphase separation of PS blocks from the matrix. A minimum of 27 mol% of epoxidation, which corresponds to 4.8 wt% of epoxidized polybutadiene (PB) units in the overall mixture, was needed to ensure nanostructuring of final mixtures and thus their transparency. Hexagonally ordered nanostructures were achieved for PS contents of around 16–20 wt%, which agrees with our previous results for mixtures with other SBS copolymers with different ratios between blocks. The fracture toughness of the epoxy matrix was improved or at least retained with mixing. CONCLUSION: The degree of epoxidation of PB blocks needed to switch epoxy/SBS mixtures from a macrophase‐separated to a nanostructured state has been established. The generated morphologies in the epoxy systems are mainly dependent on the PS content in the mixture. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Investigation of morphology formation in SBS block copolymer/homopolystyrene blends

Polymer blends comprising a polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐polystyrene (SBS) block copolymer and atactic homopolystyrene (hPS) were investigated using injection molded and solution cast samples. The morphology of the materials was studied by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning force microscopy (SFM). Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was used to characterize the phase behavior and the morphology formation of the block copolymer as well as of the SBS/hPS blends. The glass transition temperatures seem to strongly depend on the homogeneity of the corresponding phases. A distinct difference was found between the morphologies of the blends prepared by different methods. While the SBS block copolymer always shows a lamellar morphology in injection molded or as‐cast samples, the injection molded blends show a disturbance in the morphology consisting of alternating layers. In contrast, in the case of as‐cast samples, added hPS forms polystyrene domains dispersed in a matrix of the pure block copolymer. Regarding the change in the glass transition temperature, in the effective volume and in the interfacial volume obtained from DMA curves, the morphology formation of the injection molded samples (pure SBS block copolymer and the corresponding blends) was investigated. Two different structural models for the blends are proposed. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1534–1542, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Adhesion properties of UV crosslinked polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene copolymer and tackifier mixture

The peel and tack properties of mixtures of polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene (SBS) and a tackifier were investigated after these were crosslinked by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation at various amounts of benzophenone (BP) as a photoinitiator and trimethylolpropane mercaptopropionate (TRIS) as a crosslinking agent.The degree of crosslinking of polybutadiene (PB) block in the SBS mixture was qualitatively estimated from the amount of gel fraction as well as the change in the glass transition temperature of the PB block. The crosslinking of the PB block was done within 3 min after UV irradiation and the peel strength of crosslinked specimens was as low as 45[percnt] of specimens without crosslinking. Nano-tack and bulk tack properties as well as the surface tension of mixtures were measured depending upon amounts of BP and TRIS.     

Nonlinear stress properties of poly(styrene-block-butadiene-block-styrene) melt under elongational and shear deformation

Effects of block copolymerized structure on nonlinear stress properties under elongational and shear deformation were investigated. Samples used in this study were poly(styrene-block-butadiene-block-styrene) (SBS, weight rate of S/B = 40/60) and polystyrene (PS) as a reference. Tensile stress–strain and shear stress relaxation properties were measured at the molten state. SBS showed high elasticity after reaching the yield point under elongational deformation at room temperature. PS melt showed substantial tensile stress increase after the yield point as strain rates increased. However, SBS melt did not exhibit noticeable tensile stress rise at higher elongation, and this property was almost independent of strain rates. Stress relaxation experiments revealed that the damping function of SBS melt was more strain-softening than that of PS melt. The results suggested that the block copolymerized structure decreases melt elasticity under elongational and shear deformation. A transmission electron micrograph indicated that the lack of melt elasticity in SBS melt is caused by orientation of the lamellar structure toward the stretched direction during deformation. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Controlling the morphology of polybutadiene-poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymers in bulk and the orientation in thin films by attachment of alkyl side chains

A polybutadiene₁₉-block-poly(ethylene oxide)₉₄ (PB-PEO) has been modified by free-radical additions of 2-ethylhexanethiol, 1-decanethiol, and 1-dodecanethiol separately to the PB block. The block copolymers were characterized by DSC, SAXS, XRD and AFM measurements. Above the melting temperature of PEO, PB-PEO showed hexagonal morphology having PB cylinders in the PEO matrix. The addition of alkyl side chains decreased the volume fraction of PEO and the morphology changed to lamellar for ethylhexyl side chains and to reversed hexagonal morphology with PEO cylinders in the PB/alkyl chain matrix for decyl and dodecyl side chains. Below the melting temperature of PEO, all polymers showed lamellar morphology. In the case of dodecyl side chains, the lamellar morphology oriented perpendicular to the air/film interface and was stable against high temperature annealing.     

Temperature-composition phase diagrams of binary blends of block copolymer and homopolymer

The temperature-composition phase diagrams for six pairs of diblock copolymer and homopolymer are presented, putting emphasis on the effects of block copolymer composition and the molecular weight of added homopolymers. For the study, two polystyrene-block-polyisoprene (SI diblock) copolymers having lamellar or spherical microdomains, a polystyrene-block-polybutadiene (SB diblock) copolymer having lamellar microdomains, and a series of polystyrene (PS), polyisoprene (PI), and polybutadiene (PB) were used to prepare SI/PS, SI/PI, SB/PS, and SB/PB binary blends, via solvent casting, over a wide range of compositions. The shape of temperature-composition phase diagram of block copolymer/homopolymer blend is greatly affected by a small change in the ratio of the molecular weight of added homopolymer to the molecular weight of corresponding block (M_H,A/M_C,A or M_H,B/M_C,B) when the block copolymer is highly asymmetric in composition but only moderately even for a large change in M_H,A/M_C,A ratio when the block copolymer is symmetric or nearly symmetric in composition. The boundary between the mesophase (M₁) of block copolymer and the homogeneous phase (H) of block copolymer/homopolymer blend was determined using oscillatory shear rheometry, and the boundary between the homogeneous phase (H) and two-phase liquid mixture (L₁+L₂) with L₁ being disordered block copolymer and L₂ being macrophase-separated homopolymer was determined using cloud point measurement. It is found that the addition of PI to a lamella-forming SI diblock copolymer or the addition of PB to a lamella-forming SB diblock copolymer gives rise to disordered micelles (DM) having no long-range order, while the addition of PS to a lamella-forming SB diblock copolymer retains lamellar microdomain structure until microdomains disappear completely. Thus, the phase diagram of SI/PI or SB/PB blends looks more complicated than that of SI/PS or SB/PS blends.     

Synergistic effect of dual rubber system in toughening styrene maleic anhydride copolymers

Styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymers were toughened by blending with two distinctly different rubber modifiers: styrene‐butadiene‐styrene (SBS) block copolymer and methacrylated butadiene‐styrene emulsion‐made graft copolymer (MBS). The modifiers were used both individually and in combination for the examination of their roles in toughening SMA. SMA was miscible with poly(methylmethacrylate) shell of MBS, whereas it was partially miscible with the polystyrene (PS) phase of SBS. When 40–50% of SBS was used in blends, the PS phase of SBS became immiscible with SMA. SBS did not improve the Izod impact strength of SMA appreciably. A prominent synergistic toughening effect was experimentally observed when SBS and MBS were used in combination in brittle SMA. This effect may be attributed to the fact that the large SBS particles initiate crazes and small MBS particles with good adhesion to SMA matrix improve the ligament thickness, which may play a critical role in craze growth and termination. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2260–2267, 2003     

Morphology and micromechanical behavior of binary blends comprising block copolymers having different architectures

Morphology and deformation behavior of binary blends comprising styrene/butadiene block copolymers (polystyrene content, Φ_PS∼0.70) having different molecular architectures were studied by means of transmission electron microscopy and tensile testing. In contrast to the binary diblock copolymer blends discussed in literature, the phase separation behavior of the blends investigated was found to be strongly affected by asymmetric molecular architecture. The blends showed macrophase separated grains, in which the structures resembled the microphase morphology of none of the blend components. Unlike the classical rubber-modified or particle-filled thermoplastics, neither debonding at the particle/matrix interface nor the particle cavitation was observed in these nanostructured blends. The microdeformation of the blends revealed plastic drawing of polystyrene lamellae or PS struts dispersed in rubbery matrix and orientation of the whole deformation structures along the strain direction.     

极性化SBS／增粘树脂共混物的相容性研究

利用动态力学分析(DMA)方法,研究了吡啶基官能化的SBS(极性化SBS或SBSVP)热塑弹性体与数种增粘树脂共混物的动态力学性能,以此表征SBSVP与不同增粘树脂的相容性.试验结果表明,SBSVP与不同增粘树脂共混后,共混物的玻璃化转变温度(Tg)会发生相应的变化,表明不同种类的增粘树脂与SBSVP中PS及PB相的相容性各不相同.其相客性为以下几种情况不同程度的组合:树脂与SBSVP中的PB相相容;树脂与PS相相容;树脂与PB、PS相都相容;树脂与PB、PS相都不相容.同时可能会有过渡相和中间相的产生.     

Self‐assembled structures in blends of disordered and lamellar block copolymers: SAXS,SANS and TEM study

BACKGROUND: The phase behaviour of copolymers and their blends is of great interest due to the phase transitions, self‐assembly and formation of ordered structures. Phenomena associated with the microdomain morphology of parent copolymers and phase behaviour in blends of deuterated block copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), i.e. (dPS‐block‐dPMMA)₁/(dPS‐block‐PMMA)₂, were investigated using small‐angle X‐ray scattering, small‐angle neutron scattering and transmission electron microscopy as a function of molecular weight, concentration of added copolymers and temperature. RESULTS: Binary blends of the diblock copolymers having different molecular weights and different original micromorphology (one copolymer was in a disordered state and the others were of lamellar phase) were prepared by a solution‐cast process. The blends were found to be completely miscible on the molecular level at all compositions, if their molecular weight ratio was smaller than about 5. The domain spacing D of the blends can be scaled with M_n by D ～ M_n^2/3 as predicted by a previously published postulate (originally suggested and proved for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers). CONCLUSIONS: The criterion for forming a single‐domain morphology (molecularly mixed blend) taking into account the different solubilization of copolymer blocks has been applied to explain the changes in microdomain morphology during the self‐assembling process in two copolymer blends. Evidently the criterion, suggested originally for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers, can be employed to a much broader range of block copolymer blends. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization effects of styrenic/rubber block copolymers in polypropylene/polystyrene blends

Compatibilizing effects of styrene/rubber block copolymers poly(styrene‐b‐butadiene‐b‐styrene) (SBS), poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐propylene) (SEP), and two types of poly(styrene‐b‐ethylene‐co‐butylene‐b‐styrene) (SEBS), which differ in their molecular weights on morphology and selected mechanical properties of immiscible polypropylene/polystyrene (PP/PS) 70/30 blend were investigated. Three different concentrations of styrene/rubber block copolymers were used (2.5, 5, and 10 wt %). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to examine the phase morphology of blends. The SEM analysis revealed that the size of the dispersed particles decreases as the content of the compatibilizer increases. Reduction of the dispersed particles sizes of blends compatibilized with SEP, SBS, and low‐molecular weight SEBS agrees well with the theoretical predictions based on interaction energy densities determined by the binary interaction model of Paul and Barlow. The SEM analysis confirmed improved interfacial adhesion between matrix and dispersed phase. The TEM micrographs showed that SBS, SEP, and low‐molecular weight SEBS enveloped and joined pure PS particles into complex dispersed aggregates. Bimodal particle size distribution was observed in the case of SEP and low‐molecular weight SEBS addition. Notched impact strength (a_k), elongation at yield (ε_y), and Young's modulus (E) were measured as a function of weight percent of different types of styrene/rubber block copolymers. The a_k and ε_y were improved whereas E gradually decreased with increasing amount of the compatibilizer. The a_k was improved significantly by the addition of SEP. It was found that the compatibilizing efficiency of block copolymer used is strongly dependent on the chemical structure of rubber block, molecular weight of block copolymer molecule, and its concentration. The SEP diblock copolymer proved to be a superior compatibilizer over SBS and SEBS triblock copolymers. Low‐molecular weight SEBS appeared to be a more efficient compatibilizer in PP/PS blend than high‐molecular weight SEBS. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 291–307, 1999     

Temperature-dependent interaction parameters of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(2-vinyl pyridine) and poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(4-vinyl pyridine) pairs

Temperature-dependent interaction parameters (α) of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(2-vinyl pyridine) (PMMA/P2VP) pair and PMMA/poly(4-vinyl pyridine) (PMMA/P4VP) pair were obtained from the SAXS profiles at various temperatures, and curve fitting to the random phase approximation theory. For this purpose, symmetric P2VP-block-PMMA and P4VP-block-PMMA copolymers were synthesized anionically. The molecular weights of both block copolymers were controlled to exhibit the disordered state over the entire experimental temperatures. We found that the value of α for PMMA/P4VP was larger than PMMA/P2VP, similar to polystyrene (PS)/poly(vinyl pyridine) pairs. However, the difference between in α between PMMA/P2VP and PMMA/P4VP was much smaller than that between PS/P2VP and PS/P4VP. This might be attributed to the hydrophilic PMMA block compared with hydrophobic PS block. Finally, the order-to-disorder transition temperature for symmetric P2VP-block-PMMA copolymers was determined by small angle X-ray scattering and birefringence methods.     

Effect of styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymer structure on its compatibilization efficiency in PS/PB and PS/PP blends

Two styrene‐butadiene triblock copolymers differing in the length of their styrene blocks (40S‐60B‐40S and 10S‐60B‐10S) were used as compatibilizers for PS/PB (4/1) and PS/PP (4/1) blends. The supramolecular structure of the copolymers determined by small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS), morphology of the blends using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and their tensile impact strength were chosen as criteria of the compatibilization efficiency of the copolymers used. Different mechanisms of compatibilization for “symmetrical” system (PS/PB/SBS) and “asymmetrical” system (PS/PP/SBS) were proved. While for the PS/PB blend, the 40S‐60B‐40S copolymer proved to be a good compatibilizer, for the PS/PP blend, surprisingly, the 10S‐60B‐10S copolymer is more efficient.     

Synthesis of block copolymers with thermodynamically compatible chain segments: di‐ and triblock copolymers of polystyrene and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Mono‐ and bifunctional poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) macroinitiators for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were prepared by esterification of mono‐ and bishydroxy telechelic PPO with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The macroinitiators were used for ATRP of styrene to give block copolymers with PPO and polystyrene (PS) segments, namely PPO‐block‐PS and PS‐block‐PPO‐block‐PS. Various ligands were studied in combination with CuBr as ATRP catalysts. Kinetic investigations revealed controlled polymerization processes for certain ligands and temperature ranges. Thermal analysis of the block copolymers by means of DSC revealed only one glass transition temperature as a result of the compatibility of the PS and PPO chain segments and the formation of a single phase; this glass transition temperature can be adjusted over a wide temperature range (ca 100–199 °C), depending on the composition of the block copolymer. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Influence of the extrusion process on the morphology and micromechanical behavior of polystyrene‐block‐(polystyrene‐co‐butadiene)‐block‐polystyrene star block copolymer/homopolystyrene blends

The influence of the extrusion process on the morphology and micromechanical behavior of an asymmetric polystyrene‐block‐(polystyrene‐co‐butadiene)‐block‐polystyrene (SBS) star block copolymer and its blends with general‐purpose homopolystyrene (hPS) was studied with films prepared with a single‐screw extruder. The techniques used were transmission electron microscopy and uniaxial tensile testing. Unlike the pure SBS block copolymer possessing a gyroid‐like morphology, whose deformation was found to be insensitive to the processing conditions, the mechanical properties of the blends strongly depended on the extrusion temperature as well as the apparent shear rate. The deformation micromechanism was primarily dictated by the blend morphology. The yielding and cavitation of the nanostructures were the principal deformation mechanism for the blends having a droplet‐like microphase‐separated morphology, whereas cavitation dominated for the blends containing macrophase‐separated layers of polystyrene. The mechanical properties of the blends were further examined with respect to the influence of the temperature and shear rate on the phase behavior of the blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Strain-induced ordering of microdomain structures in polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene triblock copolymers cross-linked in the disordered state

Strain-induced ordering of microdomain structures in cross-linked polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene (SBS) triblock copolymers was examined by the small-angle X-ray scattering technique. To stretch the SBS samples at elevated temperature above the glass transition temperature of polystyrene, polybutadiene blocks were chemically cross-linked in the disordered state. The initial morphology was disorder-like or bicontinuous due to incompletion of microphase separation in the presence of the chemical cross-links. When the cross-linked SBS samples were mechanically stretched at 130 °C and were further annealed for 24 h under a stretched state, the random domain structures ordered gradually and lamellar-like regularity was finally attained. It was found that the ordering proceeded more for the case of the higher strain.     

Organic/inorganic nanoobjects with controlled shapes from gelable triblock copolymers

A functional gelable triblock copolymer, poly(2-vinylpyridine)-block-poly(3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate)-block-polystyrene (P2VP-b-PTEPM-b-PS), was prepared by the combination of reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) mediated radical polymerization and copper catalyzed click chemistry. Bulk microphase separation of P2VP₃₁₀-b-PTEPM₅₈-b-PS₃₂₂ under different conditions was studied in order to prepare organic/inorganic nanoobjects by a procedure of crosslinking PTEPM phases and dispersing in a solvent. The conditions included using different annealing solvents and adding stearic acids to form supramolecular complexes with P2VP blocks respectively. Then the packed cylinders with P2VP cores and PTEPM shells dispersed in the PS matrix, lamella with alternating PS, PTEPM and P2VP layers, and the inverse cylindrical morphology with PS cores and PTEPM shells dispersed in the matrix of P2VP/stearic acid complex were obtained respectively just from the same triblock copolymer sample. After crosslinking PTEPM microdomains by sol-gel process and dispersing in solvents, a series of organic/inorganic polymeric nanoobjects, including two types of nanofibers with inverse internal structure and one novel kind of nanoplates, were produced. Further modification of the fibers with P2VP cores has been studied.     

Molecular Characterization of Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene Block Copolymers (SBS) by GPC, NMR, and FTIR

Summary This paper deals with the characterization of styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) block copolymers at molecular level through different techniques. SBS molecular weight distributions (MWD) were measured by Gel Permeation chromatography (GPC) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solvent and using a calibration curve based on mono-dispersed polystyrene standards; afterwards, the relative molecular weights obtained by GPC were adjusted using a correction factor based on Mark-Houwink-Sakurada parameters for SBS in THF. Quantitative characterization of polybutadiene (PB) structures in SBS was made by solid-state ¹³C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). A novel method using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) has been developed for characterizing the SBS composition. This method covers the determination of composition in SBS ranging from 20 to 75 wt% of polybutadiene (PB) and was performed based on a FTIR calibration curve, which was prepared using mixtures of polystyrene (PS) and polybutadiene (PB) of known compositions.