Desiderata for product labeling of medical expert systems

The ability of seventy clinical laboratories in nine European countries to detect glycopeptide resistance in Gram-positive bacteria was investigated. Results of routine tests were compared with those on the same strains by a reference method in national co-ordinating laboratories. In addition, control strains were tested by some of the participants. Errors in reporting susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to teicoplanin and vancomycin and coagulase-negative staphylococci to vancomycin were < 1%. With coagulase-negative staphylococci however, 44 (3.4%) teicoplanin susceptible isolates were reported intermediate and six (0.4%) resistant; 18 (58.1%) of 31 teicoplanin intermediate isolates were reported susceptible and five (16.1%) resistant; and six of nine teicoplanin resistant isolates were reported susceptible and two intermediate. All seven isolates of enterococci intermediate to vancomycin were reported susceptible. Distribution of a known vancomycin intermediate strain of E. gallinarum indicated problems with vancomycin susceptibility testing (44.4% reported susceptible, 32.7% intermediate, 32.1% resistant) and identification (only 34.1% correct) of this organism. Two of 28 teicoplanin resistant enterococci and three of 30 vancomycin resistant isolates were reported susceptible. Among other organisms, one resistant Lactobacillus sp. was reported susceptible to teicoplanin and vancomycin. In reporting teicoplanin susceptible organisms, there were fewer errors with comparative/Stokes methods than with most other methods and more errors with the ATB and Sceptor methods than most other methods. None of the methods used were reliable for testing teicoplanin intermediate and resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci or low-level vancomycin resistant enterococci. Alternative methods, such as breakpoint screening, should be considered for detecting glycopeptide resistance.     

A closer look at vancomycin, teicoplanin, and antimicrobial resistance

The worldwide increase in the incidence of resistant Gram-positive infections has renewed interest in the glycopeptide class of antimicrobial agents. Two glycopeptides are available in many parts of the world--vancomycin and teicoplanin. These two agents appear to differ in several respects, including: potential for selecting microbial resistance, dosing convenience, safety, and efficacy in severe infection. Teicoplanin appears to have lower toxicity and greater convenience; however, its widespread acceptance has been plagued by concerns over antimicrobial resistance, efficacy, and appropriate dosing. A review of available studies suggests that teicoplanin, when dosed at 6 mg/kg/day, is better tolerated than vancomycin 15 mg/kg/q12h; however, at these doses, it appears to be somewhat less effective than vancomycin in serious Staphylococcus aureus infection, such as endocarditis. Although higher doses of teicoplanin, 12 mg/kg/day to 30 mg/kg/day, have been associated with efficacy comparable to that of vancomycin in serious S. aureus infections, such doses may eliminate some of the safety advantages conferred by lower teicoplanin doses. Teicoplanin has been associated with resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci and the selection of resistance in S. aureus. There is some evidence that widespread use of teicoplanin might accelerate the development of S. aureus resistance to both teicoplanin and vancomycin. The selection of an appropriate glycopeptide in an individual patient should be based not only on convenience, but also on a determination of optimal efficacy, safety at an efficacious dose, and the potential for resistance.     

Structural and biochemical changes in lungs of 3-methylindole-treated rats

This study compared co-amoxiclav, vancomycin and teicoplanin with and without netilmicin or amikacin for treating experimental subcutaneous fibrin-clot infection in rabbits due to a clinical beta-lactamase-positive methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain (MGRSE). MICs (mg/L) for this strain were: oxacillin 125, gentamicin 32, vancomycin 4, teicoplanin 8, netilmicin 1, amikacin 4, amoxycillin 64 with clavulanate at 2 mg/L. In rabbits treated with a single-dose i.v. regimen (netilmicin 8 mg/kg, amikacin 20 mg/kg, vancomycin 30 mg/kg, teicoplanin 15 mg/kg, co-amoxiclav 150-30 mg/kg), the bacterial count 24 h post-dose was reduced whatever the combination used (ANOVA, P < or = 0.001). Regimens were statistically classified in decreasing order of efficacy as follows: co-amoxiclav combined with netilmicin > vancomycin either alone or combined with either netilmicin or amikacin, teicoplanin with netilmicin > netilmicin and co-amoxiclav alone > teicoplanin or co-amoxiclav combined with amikacin, and teicoplanin alone > amikacin > no drug. From these findings, it is concluded that: co-amoxiclav could be useful for the treatment of beta-lactamase-positive and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis infection; some enzyme-resistant aminoglycoside could be considered for treating gentamicin-resistant but netilmicin/amikacin-sensitive S. epidermidis infection; the combination of co-amoxiclav with netilmicin was synergistic and more rapidly bactericidal than vancomycin in this animal model.     

Reduced intracortical facilitation in patients with cerebellar degeneration

Susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Enterococcus faecium obtained from various hospitals of the Tohoku district were documented. MICs of 6 antimicrobial agents against a total of 480 strains (380 strains were MRSA and 100 were E. faecium) were estimated. All MRSAs were susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and quinupristin/dalfopristin, but all of them were resistant to ampicillin and benzylpenicillin. None of the E. faecium strains were found to be resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin and quinupristin/dalfopristin. Excluding these, almost all strains of E. faecium were resistant to the remaining drugs. These data suggest that despite the emergence of vancomycin resistance to E. faecium in Europe and in the United States, vancomycin, teicoplanin and quinupristin/dalfopristin will nevertheless provide effective bactericidal activity in the Tohoku area of Japan.     

Efficacy of teicoplanin and autoradiographic diffusion pattern of [14C]teicoplanin in experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection of joint prostheses

Prosthesis infections are difficult to cure. Infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci is becoming more common in patients with orthopedic implants. Using a recently developed model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection of a knee prosthesis, we compared the efficacies of teicoplanin and vancomycin. [14C]teicoplanin diffusion in this model was also studied by autoradiography. A partial knee replacement was performed with a silicone implant fitting into the intramedullary canal of the tibia, and 10(7) CFU of MRSA was injected into the knee. Treatment with teicoplanin or vancomycin (20 or 60 mg/kg of body weight, respectively, given intramuscularly twice daily) was started 7 days after inoculation and was continued for 7 days. The teicoplanin and vancomycin MICs for MRSA were 1 microg/ml. Mean peak and trough levels in serum were 39.1 and 23.5 microg/ml, respectively, for teicoplanin and 34.4 and 18.5 microg/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. Fifteen days after the end of therapy, the animals were killed and their tibias were removed, pulverized, and quantitatively cultured. Teicoplanin and vancomycin significantly reduced (P < 0. 05) the bacterial density (2.7 +/- 1.3 and 3.3 +/- 1.6 log10 CFU/g of bone, respectively) compared to those for the controls (5.04 +/- 1.4 log10 CFU/g of bone). The bacterial covents of teicoplanin- and vancomycin-treated rabbits were comparable. The [14C]teicoplanin autoradiographic diffusion patterns in rabbits with prostheses, two of which were uninfected and two of which were infected, were studied 15 days after inoculation. Sixty minutes after the end of an infusion of 250 microCi of [14C]teicoplanin, autoradiography showed that in the infected animals, the highest levels of radioactivity were located around the prosthesis and in the periosteum, bone marrow, and trabecular bone. Radioactivity was less intense in epiphyseal disk cartilage, femoral cartilage, articular ligaments, and muscles and was weak in compact bone. A similar distribution pattern was seen in uninfected rabbits. Thus, teicoplanin may represent an effective alternative therapy for the treatment of these infections.     

The value of ultrafast computed tomography in the investigation of pediatric chest disease

A significant number of open and comparative studies have now addressed the use of teicoplanin in the treatment of documented or presumed infection in patients with haematological and non-haematological malignancy. Available evidence suggests that teicoplanin is an effective agent against such infections, with an excellent safety profile. The use of teicoplanin and vancomycin may be justified as part of the initial management of clinically infected right atrial catheters in patients with malignancy. The first-line use of glycopeptides may also be appropriate in units where streptococcal and methicillin resistant staphylococcal infections are prevalent. However, such a policy should be reviewed regularly. Except in the above situations, a delay in the introduction of either teicoplanin or vancomycin in cancer patients does not appear to produce any excess mortality, but there may be some additional morbidity in terms of fever and malaise. The introduction of glycopeptides as second-line agents is indicated for sensitive, microbiologically documented infections and for patients who have not responded to empirical, first-line therapy. Non-inpatient treatment with teicoplanin is an area of ongoing interest and may be justified on both humanitarian and pharmacoeconomic grounds. The use of glycopeptides in the prophylactic setting remains controversial and should be avoided while the emergence of resistance, particularly in enterococci, should be monitored closely.     

Activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against penicillin-resistant pneumococci in vitro and in vivo and correlation to pharmacokinetic parameters in the mouse peritonitis model

The activities of glycopeptides against pneumococci were studied in vitro and in vivo. The MICs of two glycopeptides, vancomycin and teicoplanin, in different media against 10 strains of pneumococci with different susceptibilities to penicillin were determined. The MICs of teicoplanin were four times lower than those of vancomycin in Mueller-Hinton media supplemented with 5% blood, but the MICs were similar in mouse and human sera supplemented with 5% blood. The serum protein binding levels in mouse and human sera were 90% for teicoplanin in both and 25 and 35%, respectively, for vancomycin. The MICs for vancomycin and teicoplanin were only correlated in human serum (P < 0.001). The single doses giving protection to 50% of the animals in the mouse peritonitis model after a lethal challenge of pneumococci, the ED50s, were similar for vancomycin and teicoplanin, between 0.1 and 1 mg/kg of body weight for all 10 strains. The log ED50s were significantly correlated only to the log MICs of teicoplanin determined for mouse serum with 5% blood (P = 0.01) and to the log MICs of vancomycin determined by the E test (P = 0.03). Among the pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed at the ED50s, the most constant parameter was the time for which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T(>MIC)) when each drug was considered separately; however, when both drugs were considered together, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) varied the least. This indicates that both these parameters are of importance for predicting the effect of the drugs. We conclude that the effect of glycopeptides was not influenced by the penicillin resistance of the pneumococci, either in vitro or in vivo, and that the superior activity of teicoplanin over that of vancomycin in vitro was abolished in vivo, an effect which probably was due to the high serum protein binding of teicoplanin. Both the pharmacokinetic parameters T(>MIC) and Cmax are important predicting the effect of glycopeptides, but the pharmacodynamics of glycopeptides are still not completely elucidated.     

Ceftazidime plus amikacin plus teicoplanin or vancomycin in the empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare teicoplanin to vancomycin as part of the empirical antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive ceftazidime (100 mg/kg daily every 8 h), amikacin (15 mg/kg daily every 8 h) and teicoplanin (6 mg/kg once a day) and 53 other patients received ceftazidime, amikacin (same dosages) and vancomycin (30 mg/kg/day every 6 h). In 99 evaluable episodes, the success rates were 54% for patients receiving teicoplanin and 52% for patients receiving vancomycin (p=0.76, 95% CI-18-23). The response rates were similar for patients with unexplained fever and for patients with documented infections. There were no differences in renal toxicity or cutaneous side effects between the two groups. The overall death rate was 18.9%, with 10 deaths in each group. The most important factor associated with death was the diagnosis of a fungal infection (p=0.001). Teicoplanin seems to be well tolerated and as effective as vancomycin in the empirical antibiotic therapy of fever in neutropenic cancer patients.     

Severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Emergence of resistance to fusidic acid or fosfomycin during treatment with continuous infusion of vancomycin

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the development of resistance to fosfomycin or fucidic acid in severe infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to assess the relationship with serum levels of vancomycin METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in patients hospitalized in our intensive care unit during a 3-year period (1993-1995) who were treated for severe MRSA infection with continuous infusion vacomycin and fosfomycin or fucidic acid. We analyzed the development of resistance and serum levels of vancomycin. RESULTS: During this period, only 20 patients received continuous infusion vancomycin plus fucidic acid or fosfomycin. MSRA resistant to fucidic or fosfomycin developed in 9. Vancomycin serum levels were significantly lower in patients who developed resistance to focidic acid or fosfomycin, both during the first 5 days of treatment (16.68 +/- 1.07 micrograms/ml vs. 22.64 +/- 1.05 mg/ml, p < 0.01) and throughout treatment duration (17.29 +/- 1.07 micrograms/ml vs. 21.85 +/- 0.78 microgram/ml, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that in spite of continuous vancomycin infusion at an initial rate of 2 g/24 h, Staphylococcus aureus resistance to fosfomycin or fucidic acid an develop during ongoing treatment. Vancomycin levels of at least 20 micrograms/ml should be obtained as rapidly as possible.     

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with both upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding

We retrospectively evaluated antiinfective therapy for methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) endocarditis in 54 patients who had 57 treatment courses for the disease. Three treatments were assessed: 27 nafcillin-treated courses of MSSA endocarditis, 18 vancomycin-treated courses of MSSA endocarditis, and 11 vancomycin-treated courses of MRSA endocarditis. At baseline, patients with MSSA treated with vancomycin had more chronic conditions (p<0.01), a lower frequency of intravenous drug use (p<0.01), a lower hematocrit concentration (p<0.05), and a higher serum creatinine concentration (p<0.05) than the nafcillin group. Vancomycin-treated patients had a higher complication rate during therapy (p<0.05) and a longer duration in an intensive care unit (p<0.01) than the nafcillin group. The trend was for a higher complete response rate in the nafcillin group (74% vs 50%, p=0.12), but no difference in mortality (22% vs 28%, p=0.73). Patients with MRSA infection treated with vancomycin had higher mortality than those with MSSA who received that drug (55% vs 28%, p=0.24). Patients with vancomycin-treated MSSA endocarditis may have a poorer outcome than those who receive nafcillin, but this may be influenced by different or more severe clinical features.     

Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides

During the last several years a series of staphylococcal isolates that demonstrated reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or other glycopeptides have been reported. We selected 12 isolates of staphylococci for which the vancomycin MICs were > or =4 microg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were > or =8 microg/ml and 24 control strains for which the vancomycin MICs were < or =2 microg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were < or =4 microg/ml to determine the ability of commercial susceptibility testing procedures and vancomycin agar screening methods to detect isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. By PCR analysis, none of the isolates with decreased glycopeptide susceptibility contained known vancomycin resistance genes. Broth microdilution tests held a full 24 h were best at detecting strains with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. Disk diffusion did not differentiate the strains inhibited by 8 microg of vancomycin per ml from more susceptible isolates. Most of the isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility were recognized by MicroScan conventional panels and Etest vancomycin strips. Sensititre panels read visually were more variable, although with some of the panels MICs of 8 microg/ml were noted for these isolates. Vitek results were 4 microg/ml for all strains for which the vancomycin MICs were > or =4 microg/ml. Vancomycin MICs on Rapid MicroScan panels were not predictive, giving MICs of either < or =2 or > or =16 microg/ml for these isolates. Commercial brain heart infusion vancomycin agar screening plates containing 6 microg of vancomycin per ml consistently differentiated those strains inhibited by 8 microg/ml from more susceptible strains. Vancomycin-containing media prepared in-house showed occasional growth of susceptible strains, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and on occasion, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Thus, strains of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, such as vancomycin, are best detected in the laboratory by nonautomated quantitative tests incubated for a full 24 h. Furthermore, it appears that commercial vancomycin agar screening plates can be used to detect these isolates.     

Review article: treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

AIM: A systematic review of controlled trials of therapy of Clostridium difficile intestinal infection using methodology described by the Cochrane Collaboration. METHODS: Trials were identified by searching computer databases over the years 1978-1996. Trials were included if they were (a) prospective randomized, controlled trials and (b) included patients with symptomatic disease. The primary end-point was clinical resolution of diarrhoea. Secondary end-points were clinical relapse and stool clearance of C. difficile and C. difficile toxin. RESULTS: Nine trials (469 patients) satisfying the inclusion criteria were identified. Two trials were placebo controlled. Six trials compared vancomycin to other antibiotics (fusidic acid, bacitracin, teicoplanin and metronidazole). For clinical resolution response rates ranged from 21 (placebo) to 100% (vancomycin). On pooling the trials, no antibiotic showed clear therapeutic superiority. Rates of clinical relapse ranged from 5 to 42%. Only one trial showed significant advantage of one antibiotic over another for prevention of relapse (teicoplanin vs. fusidic acid). CONCLUSION: The published data are limited, and further studies are required.     

Demonstration of safety of probiotics -- a review

Probiotics are commonly defined as viable microorganisms (bacteria or yeasts) that exhibit a beneficial effect on the health of the host when they are ingested. They are used in foods, especially in fermented dairy products, but also in pharmaceutical preparations. The development of new probiotic strains aims at more active beneficial organisms. In the case of novel microorganisms and modified organisms the question of their safety and the risk to benefit ratio have to be assessed. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in foods have a long history of safe use. Members of the genera Lactococcus and Lactobacillus are most commonly given generally-recognised-as-safe (GRAS) status whilst members of the genera Streptococcus and Enterococcus and some other genera of LAB contain some opportunistic pathogens. Lactic acid bacteria are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. In many cases resistances are not, however, transmissible, and the species are also sensitive to many clinically used antibiotics even in the case of a lactic acid bacteria- associated opportunistic infection. Therefore no particular safety concern is associated with intrinsic type of resistance. Plasmid-associated antibiotic resistance, which occasionally occurs, is another matter because of the possibility of the resistance spreading to other, more harmful species and genera. The transmissible enterococcal resistance against glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin and teicoplanin) is particularly noteworthy, as vancomycin is one of the last effective antibiotics left in the treatment of certain multidrug-resistant pathogens. New species and more specific strains of probiotic bacteria are constantly identified. Prior to incorporating new strains into products their efficacy should be carefully assessed, and a case by case evaluation as to whether they share the safety status of traditional food-grade organisms should be made. The current documentation of adverse effects in the literature is reviewed. Future recommendations for the safety of already existing and new probiotics will be given.     

Antibacterial activity of teicoplanin against Clostridium difficile

The in vitro inhibitory action of teicoplanin, vancomycin, metronidazole and clindamycin against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile was investigated. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using E test. Teicoplanin (MIC range 0.023-0.75 microgram/ml), vancomycin (MIC range 0.5-3 micrograms/ml) and metronidazole (MIC range 0.19-1 microgram/ml) were all very active against the isolates examined. No resistant strains of C. difficile to those three antimicrobial agents were observed, whereas resistance to clindamycin was found in 39.5% of the tested strains. Teicoplanin was about 4-times more potent than vancomycin. It appears to be a more promising antimicrobial for treatment of C. difficile enteric disease.     

Postoperative mediastinitis due to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis with low sensitivity to vancomycin

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is the drug of choice for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus. Antibiotherapy failure is rarely clinically related to Staphylococcus with vancomycin low susceptibility. CASE REPORT: A surgical cure of an aortic stenosis in a neonate was complicated by a Staphylococcus mediastinitis. After initiation of antibiotherapy with vancomycin and rifampin and surgical debridement, there was a rapid improvement. Few days later, failure of therapy was obvious. Despite continuous infusion of vancomycin, with a serum level of 29 mg/L, blood cultures were positive again to Staphylococcus. There was no endocarditis or inadequate surgical drainage. Susceptibility of the Staphylococcus was tested, looking for a tolerant strain. The vancomycin minimum bactericidal concentration was 30 mg/L (above usual value 2 to 8 mg/L), while the minimum inhibitory concentration was 3.75 mg/L. A higher dosage of vancomycin associated with fusidic acid was rapidly efficient, and total recovery was achieved. CONCLUSION: In case of failure of vancomycin therapy, despite correct serum levels, the susceptibility of the Staphylococcus strain has to be determined. A low susceptibility strain prescribes more prolonged combination of two antibiotics.     

Successful single-dose teicoplanin prophylaxis against experimental streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal aortic valve endocarditis

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that is administered both intramuscularly and intravenously. It has a prolonged half-life and a less toxic profile in comparison to those of vancomycin. The efficacy of a single dose of teicoplanin (18 mg/kg of body weight given intramuscularly) for the prevention of endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis, Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was evaluated after applying the rabbit model. Vancomycin at a single dose of 30 mg/kg given intravenously was used as the comparative agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to MRSA and E. faecium, while ampicillin at a single dose of 40 mg/kg given intravenously was used as the comparative agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to S. oralis. Rabbits in the teicoplanin group were infected at 1 h postdosing with approximately 10(7) CFU of each strain. Rabbits in the other groups were infected at 0.5 h postdosing with approximately 10(7) CFU of S. oralis (ampicillin group) or E. faecium and MRSA (vancomycin group). All rabbits were sacrificed 5 days later. Teicoplanin and vancomycin protected the animals challenged with E. faecium by 87.5 and 50%, respectively, and protected the animals challenged with MRSA by 100 and 92%, respectively. Teicoplanin and ampicillin protected the animals challenged with S. oralis by 100 and 77%, respectively. Prevention of endocarditis by teicoplanin was likely to be due to a prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth by the sustained supra-MICs. It is concluded that teicoplanin is very effective in preventing experimental streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal endocarditis and may be an attractive alternative antibiotic in patients allergic to beta-lactams, especially in the outpatient setting.     

Synergy and resistance to synergy between beta-lactam antibiotics and glycopeptides against glycopeptide-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium

A synergistic effect between vancomycin or teicoplanin and different beta-lactam antibiotics was found for two strains of Enterococcus faecium, EFM4 and EFM11, expressing resistance to glycopeptides and belonging to the VANA class. The MICs of penicillin for these two strains were 16 and 128 micrograms/ml, respectively. By using a penicillin-binding protein (PBP) competition assay, it was shown that the affinities of PBPs for different beta-lactam antibiotics and the MICs of these antibiotics obtained in the presence of teicoplanin correlated with the substitution of two high-molecular-weight PBPs for the low-molecular-weight PBP5 as the essential target. Mutants of EFM4 and EFM11 which had lost the synergistic effect between beta-lactams and glycopeptides were selected on teicoplanin plus ceftriaxone at a frequency of 10(-5) and 10(-3), respectively. The mechanism of the loss of synergy was explored. For the mutants derived from EFM4, it was associated with a change in PBPs, while for the mutants derived from EFM11, it was related to some unknown change on the conjugative plasmid responsible for the glycopeptide resistance. These combined observations reflect the relationship which seems to exist between the new D-lactate peptidoglycan precursor, synthesized when the vancomycin resistance is expressed, and the affinity of the different PBPs for this precursor.     

Low-level vancomycin resistance in Clostridium innocuum

Low-level vancomycin resistance was observed for 28 clinical Clostridium innocuum isolates and C. innocuum NCIB 10674, whereas teicoplanin was active. DNA from three clinical isolates and the type strain could not be amplified by PCR with primers specific for the genes vanA, vanB, and vanC, suggesting that C. innocuum is intrinsically resistant to vancomycin.     

In vivo verification of in vitro model of antibiotic treatment of device-related infection

Device-related infections are difficult to treat with antibiotics alone. Standard susceptibility tests do not correlate with treatment success. Therefore, the utility of a pharmacokinetic in vitro model has been evaluated in comparison with the tissue-cage infection model in guinea pigs. The bactericidal activity of 28 treatment regimens has been studied by using three different test strains. In vitro efficacy was defined as reduction in the number of suspended or adherent bacteria, and in vivo efficacy was defined as reduction in the number of bacteria in tissue-cage fluid. Test results between the two models (in vivo and in vitro) correlated well, with correlation coefficients of 0.85 for in vivo efficacy versus in vitro efficacy against suspended bacteria and 0.72 for in vivo efficacy versus in vitro efficacy against adherent bacteria (P < 0.05) for Staphylococcus aureus, 0.96 and 0.82 (P < 0.05) for Staphylococcus epidermidis, and 0.89 and 0.97 for Escherichia coli, respectively. In contrast, standard susceptibility tests, ratios of MICs to trough or peak levels, ratios of the area under the curve to the MIC, or time above the MIC were not predictive for therapeutic outcome in either the in vitro or in vivo model. In both models, the bactericidal activity levels with combination regimens were significantly higher than those with single-drug regimens (P < 0.001). Furthermore, rifampin combinations with either vancomycin, teicoplanin, fleroxacin, or ciprofloxacin were significantly more bactericidal against adherent bacteria than netilmicin combinations with vancomycin or daptomycin (P < 0.01). Thus, in vivo verification of the pharmacokinetic in vitro model correlated well with the animal model. The in vitro model offers an alternative to ther animal model in experiments that screen and assess antibiotic regimens against device-related infections.     

A fundamental study of 99mTc-HMPAO double injection method and clinical application to stress scintigraphy in orthostatic hypotension

Enterococcus faecium, which was highly resistant to vancomycin (MIC 256 mg/liter), but susceptible to teicoplanin (MIC 2 mg/liter), caused two distinct episodes of infection on a renal unit in the United Kingdom. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) indicated that a single strain caused the first episode, while the second episode, which occurred 1 year later, involved multiple strains, all of which were distinct from the original strain. Vancomycin resistance in all but one of these strains was mediated by transferable plasmids that carried the vanB glycopeptide resistance gene. Transfer either of resistance plasmids or the vanB resistance determinant itself to different strains occurred during the second episode. Plasmid-mediated vanB resistance has not been widely documented. A retrospective study of a reference collection revealed two other vanB-encoding plasmids from an E. faecalis and an E. faecium referred from two further UK centers. Although restriction analysis indicated no similarity between the plasmids from the three different centers, all contained a 2.1-kb EcoRV fragment that hybridized with a probe for the vanB gene. This suggests that there has been dissemination of a conserved glycopeptide resistance determinant, of which vanB is a part.