MAO Inhibitory Activity of 2‐Arylbenzofurans versus 3‐Arylcoumarins: Synthesis,in vitro Study,and Docking Calculations

Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is an important drug target for the treatment of neurological disorders. Several 3‐arylcoumarin derivatives were previously described as interesting selective MAO‐B inhibitors. Preserving the trans‐stilbene structure, a series of 2‐arylbenzofuran and corresponding 3‐arylcoumarin derivatives were synthesized and evaluated as inhibitors of both MAO isoforms, MAO‐A and MAO‐B. In general, both types of derivatives were found to be selective MAO‐B inhibitors, with IC₅₀ values in the nano‐ to micromolar range. 5‐Nitro‐2‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)benzofuran ( 8 ) is the most active compound of the benzofuran series, presenting MAO‐B selectivity and reversible inhibition (IC₅₀=140 nM ). 3‐(4′‐Methoxyphenyl)‐6‐nitrocoumarin ( 15 ), with the same substitution pattern as that of compound 8 , was found to be the most active MAO‐B inhibitor of the coumarin series (IC₅₀=3 nM ). However, 3‐phenylcoumarin 14 showed activity in the same range (IC₅₀=6 nM ), is reversible, and also severalfold more selective than compound 15 . Docking experiments for the most active compounds into the MAO‐B and MAO‐A binding pockets highlighted different interactions between the derivative classes (2‐arylbenzofurans and 3‐arylcoumarins), and provided new information about the enzyme–inhibitor interaction and the potential therapeutic application of these scaffolds.     

Discovery of 3‐Hydroxy‐3‐phenacyloxindole Analogues of Isatin as Potential Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors

A series of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐phenacyloxindole analogues of isatin were designed, synthesized, and evaluated in vitro for their inhibitory activity toward monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B. Most of the synthesized compounds proved to be potent and selective inhibitors of MAO‐A rather than MAO‐B. 1‐Benzyl‐3‐hydroxy‐3‐(4′‐hydroxyphenacyl)oxindole (compound 18 ) showed the highest MAO‐A inhibitory activity (IC₅₀: 0.009±0.001 μm , K_i: 3.69±0.003 nm ) and good selectivity (selectivity index: 60.44). Kinetic studies revealed that compounds 18 and 16 (1‐benzyl‐3‐hydroxy‐3‐(4′‐bromophenacyl)oxindole) exhibit competitive inhibition against MAO‐A and MAO‐B, respectively. Structure–activity relationship studies suggested that the 3‐hydroxy group is an essential feature for these analogues to exhibit potent MAO‐A inhibitory activity. Computational studies revealed the possible molecular interactions between the inhibitors and MAO isozymes. The computational data obtained are congruent with experimental results. Further studies on the lead inhibitors, including co‐crystallization of inhibitor–MAO complexes and in vivo evaluations, are essential for their development as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of MAO‐associated neurological disorders.     

Design,Synthesis, and Evaluation of 2‐Amino‐6‐nitrobenzothiazole‐Derived Hydrazones as MAO Inhibitors: Role of the Methylene Spacer Group

A series of 2‐amino‐6‐nitrobenzothiazole‐derived extended hydrazones were designed, synthesized, and investigated for their ability to inhibit monoamine oxidase A and B (MAO‐A/MAO‐B). The compounds were found to exhibit inhibitory activities in the nanomolar to micromolar range. Some of the compounds showed excellent potency and selectivity against the MAO‐B isoform. N′‐(5‐Chloro‐2‐oxoindolin‐3‐ylidene)‐2‐(6‐nitrobenzothiazol‐2‐ylamino)acetohydrazide (compound 31 ) showed the highest MAO‐B inhibitory activity (IC₅₀=1.8±0.3 nm , selectivity index [SI]=766.67), whereas compound 6 [N′‐(1‐(4‐bromophenyl)ethylidene)‐2‐(6‐nitrobenzothiazol‐2‐ylamino)acetohydrazide] was found to be the most active MAO‐A inhibitor (IC₅₀=0.42±0.003 μm ). Kinetic studies revealed that compounds 6 and 31 exhibit competitive‐type reversible inhibition against both MAO‐A and MAO‐B, respectively. Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies disclosed several structural aspects significant for potency and the contribution of the methylene spacer toward MAO‐B inhibitory potency, with minimal or no neurotoxicity. Molecular modeling studies yielded a good correlation between experimental and theoretical inhibitory data. Binding pose analysis revealed the significance of cumulative effects of π–π stacking and hydrogen bond interactions for effective stabilization of virtual ligand–protein complexes. Further optimization studies of compound 31 , including co‐crystallization of inhibitor–MAO‐B complexes, are essential to develop these compounds as potential therapeutic agents for MAO‐B‐associated neurodegenerative diseases.     

Synthesis,Biological Evaluation and Molecular Modeling Studies of Propargyl‐Containing 2,4,6‐Trisubstituted Pyrimidine Derivatives as Potential Anti‐Parkinson Agents

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) inhibitors are potential drug candidates for the treatment of various neurological disorders including Parkinson's disease. A total of 20 new propargyl‐containing 2,4,6‐trisubstituted pyrimidine derivatives were synthesized and screened for MAO inhibition using Amplex Red assays. All the synthesized compounds were found to be reversible and selective inhibitors of the MAO‐B isoform at sub‐micromolar concentrations. MVB3 was the most potent MAO‐B inhibitor with an IC₅₀ value of 0.38±0.02 μμ , whereas MVB6 (IC₅₀=0.51±0.04 μμ ) and MVB16 (IC₅₀=0.48±0.06 μμ ) were the most selective for MAO‐B with a selectivity index of more than 100‐fold. In cytotoxic studies, these compounds were found to be nontoxic to human neuroblastoma SH‐SY5Y cells at concentrations of 25 μm . MVB6 was found to decrease the intracellular level of reactive oxygen species to 68 % at 10 μm concentration, whereas other compounds did not produce significant changes in reactive oxygen species levels. In molecular modeling studies, MVB3 displayed strong binding affinity for the MAO‐B isoform with a dock score of ?10.45, in agreement with the observed activity. All the compounds fitted well in the hydrophobic cavity of MAO‐B. Thus, propargyl‐substituted pyrimidine derivatives can be promising leads in the development of potent, selective and reversible MAO‐B inhibitors for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.     

Design,Synthesis, in vitro MAO‐B Inhibitory Evaluation,and Computational Studies of Some 6‐Nitrobenzothiazole‐Derived Semicarbazones

Monoamine oxidase B (MAO‐B) is an important drug target for the treatment of neurological disorders. A series of 6‐nitrobenzothiazole‐derived semicarbazones were designed, synthesized, and evaluated as inhibitors of the rat brain MAO‐B isoenzyme. Most of the compounds were found to be potent inhibitors of MAO‐B, with IC₅₀ values in the nanomolar to micromolar range. Molecular docking studies were performed with AutoDock 4.2 to deduce the affinity and binding mode of these inhibitors toward the MAO‐B active site. The free energies of binding (ΔG) and inhibition constants (K_i) of the docked compounds were calculated by the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA) of AutoDock 4.2. Good correlations between the calculated and experimental results were obtained. 1‐[(4‐Chlorophenyl)(phenyl)methylene]‐4‐(6‐nitrobenzothiazol‐2‐yl)semicarbazide emerged as the lead MAO‐B inhibitor, with top ranking in both the experimental MAO‐B assay (IC₅₀: 0.004±0.001 μM ) and in computational docking studies (K_i: 1.08 μM ). Binding mode analysis of potent inhibitors suggests that these compounds are well accommodated by the MAO‐B active site through stable hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions. Interestingly, the 6‐nitrobenzothiazole moiety is stabilized in the substrate cavity with the aryl or diaryl residues extending up into the entrance cavity of the active site. According to our results, docking experiments could be an interesting approach for predicting the activity and binding interactions of this class of semicarbazones against MAO‐B. Thus, a binding site model consisting of three essential pharmacophoric features is proposed, and this can be used for the design of future MAO‐B inhibitors.     

Indanones As High‐Potency Reversible Inhibitors of Monoamine Oxidase

Recent reports document that α‐tetralone (3,4‐dihydro‐2H‐naphthalen‐1‐one) is an appropriate scaffold for the design of high‐potency monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. Based on the structural similarity between α‐tetralone and 1‐indanone, the present study involved synthesis of 34 1‐indanone and related indane derivatives as potential inhibitors of recombinant human MAO‐A and MAO‐B. The results show that C6‐substituted indanones are particularly potent and selective MAO‐B inhibitors, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.001 to 0.030 μM . C5‐Substituted indanone and indane derivatives are comparatively weaker MAO‐B inhibitors. Although the 1‐indanone and indane derivatives are selective inhibitors of the MAO‐B isoform, a number of homologues are also potent MAO‐A inhibitors, with three homologues possessing IC₅₀ values <0.1 μM . Dialysis of enzyme–inhibitor mixtures further established a selected 1‐indanone as a reversible MAO inhibitor with a competitive mode of inhibition. It may be concluded that 1‐indanones are promising leads for the design of therapies for neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders such as Parkinson’s disease and depression.     

Synthesis and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of 2‐(1,3,4‐Oxadiazole‐2(3H)‐thione)‐3‐amino‐5‐arylthieno[2,3‐b]pyridines as Inhibitors of DRAK2

In recent years, DAPK‐related apoptosis‐inducing protein kinase 2 (DRAK2) has emerged as a promising target for the treatment of a variety of autoimmune diseases and for the prevention of graft rejection after organ transplantation. However, medicinal chemistry optimization campaigns for the discovery of novel small‐molecule inhibitors of DRAK2 have not yet been published. Screening of a proprietary compound library led to the discovery of a benzothiophene analogue that displays an affinity constant (K_d) value of 0.25 μM . Variation of the core scaffold and of the substitution pattern afforded a series of 5‐arylthieno[2,3‐b]pyridines with strong binding affinity (K_d=0.008 μM for the most potent representative). These compounds also show promising activity in a functional biochemical DRAK2 enzyme assay, with an IC₅₀ value of 0.029 μM for the most potent congener. Selectivity profiling of the most potent compounds revealed that they lack selectivity within the DAPK family of kinases. However, one of the less potent analogues is a selective ligand for DRAK2 and can be used as starting point for the synthesis of selective and potent DRAK2 inhibitors.     

Structure–Activity Relationship of Tumor‐Selective 5‐Substituted 2‐Amino‐3‐carboxymethylthiophene Derivatives

Methyl‐2‐amino‐5‐[2‐(4‐methoxyphenethyl)]thiophene‐3‐carboxylate ( 8 c ) is the prototype of a well‐defined class of tumor‐selective agents. Compound 8 c preferentially inhibited the proliferation of a number of tumor cell lines including many human T‐lymphoma/leukemia cells, but also several prostate, renal, central nervous system and liver tumor cell types. Instead, a broad variety of other tumor cell lines including B‐lymphomas and HeLa cells were not affected. The tumor selectivity (TS; selectivity index or preferential suppression of CEM lymphoma (IC₅₀=0.90 μM ) versus HeLa tumor cell carcinoma (IC₅₀=39 μM )) amounted up to ～43 for 8 c . At higher concentrations, the compound proved cytotoxic rather than cytostatic. The antiproliferative potency and selectivity of 8 c could be preserved by replacing the ethyl linker between the 2‐amino‐3‐carboxymethylthiophene and the substituted aryl by a thioalkyl but not by an oxyalkyl nor an aminoalkyl. Among >50 novel 8 c derivatives, the 5‐(4‐ethyl‐ and 4‐isopropylarylmethylthio)thiophene analogues, methyl‐2‐amino‐5‐((4‐ethylphenylthio)methyl)thiophene‐3‐carboxylate ( 13 m ) and methyl‐2‐amino‐5‐((4‐isopropylphenylthio)methyl)thiophene‐3‐carboxylate ( 13 n ), were more potent (IC₅₀: 0.3–0.4 μM ) and selective (TS: 100–144) anti‐T‐lymphoma/leukemia agents than the prototype compound.     

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity: Methyl‐ versus Chlorochalcone Derivatives

Numerous studies have shown that chalcones are promising scaffolds for the development of new monoamine oxidase‐B (MAO‐B) inhibitors. As a continuation of our ongoing research into the development of reversible human MAO‐B (hMAO‐B) inhibitors, two series of twenty chalcones containing electron‐donating and electron‐withdrawing substituents were synthesized. All compounds were found to be competitive, selective, and reversible inhibitors of hMAO‐B except (2E)‐1‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P7 ) and (2E)‐1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P17 ), which were found to be selective inhibitors of hMAO‐A. The most potent hMAO‐B inhibitor, (2E)‐1‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐3‐(4‐ethylphenyl)prop‐2‐en‐1‐one ( P16 ), showed a K_i value of 0.11±0.01 μm . Molecular docking simulations were carried out to identify the hypothetical binding mode for the most potent compounds in the active sites of hMAO‐A and B. The ability of the compounds to cross the blood–brain barrier was assessed by parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA). Additionally, the most potent hMAO‐B inhibitor P16 showed no toxicity in cultured hepatic cells at concentrations of 5 and 25 μm .     

A Novel Competitive Class of α‐Glucosidase Inhibitors: (E)‐1‐Phenyl‐3‐(4‐Styrylphenyl)Urea Derivatives

Competitive glycosidase inhibitors are generally sugar mimics that are costly and tedious to obtain because they require challenging and elongated chemical synthesis, which must be stereo‐ and regiocontrolled. Here, we show that readily accessible achiral (E)‐1‐phenyl‐3‐(4‐strylphenyl)ureas are potent competitive α‐glucosidase inhibitors. A systematic synthesis study shows that the 1‐phenyl moiety on the urea is critical for ensuring competitive inhibition, and substituents on both terminal phenyl groups contribute to inhibition potency. The most potent inhibitor, compound 12 (IC₅₀=8.4 μM , K_i=3.2 μM ), manifested a simple slow‐binding inhibition profile for α‐glucosidase with the kinetic parameters k₃=0.005256 μM ^?1 min^?1, k₄=0.003024 min^?1, and ${K{{{\rm app}\hfill \atop {\rm i}\hfill}}}$ =0.5753 μM .     

3‐Heterocycle‐Phenyl N‐Alkylcarbamates as FAAH Inhibitors: Design,Synthesis and 3D‐QSAR Studies

Carbamates are a well‐established class of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors. Here we describe the synthesis of meta‐substituted phenolic N‐alkyl/aryl carbamates and their in vitro FAAH inhibitory activities. The most potent compound, 3‐(oxazol‐2yl)phenyl cyclohexylcarbamate ( 2 a ), inhibited FAAH with a sub‐nanomolar IC₅₀ value (IC₅₀=0.74 nM ). Additionally, we developed and validated three‐dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR) models of FAAH inhibition combining the newly disclosed carbamates with our previously published inhibitors to give a total set of 99 compounds. Prior to 3D‐QSAR modeling, the degree of correlation between FAAH inhibition and in silico reactivity was also established. Both 3D‐QSAR methods used, CoMSIA and GRID/GOLPE, produced statistically significant models with coefficient of correlation for external prediction (R²_PRED) values of 0.732 and 0.760, respectively. These models could be of high value in further FAAH inhibitor design.     

Exploration of a Library of 3,4‐(Methylenedioxy)aniline‐Derived Semicarbazones as Dual Inhibitors of Monoamine Oxidase and Acetylcholinesterase: Design,Synthesis, and Evaluation

A library of 3,4‐(methylenedioxy)aniline‐derived semicarbazones was designed, synthesized, and evaluated as monoamine oxidase (MAO) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Most of the new compounds selectively inhibited MAO‐B and AChE, with IC₅₀ values in the micro‐ or nanomolar ranges. Compound 16 , 1‐(2,6‐dichlorobenzylidene)‐4‐(benzo[1,3]dioxol‐5‐yl)semicarbazide presented a balanced multifunctional profile of MAO‐A (IC₅₀=4.52±0.032 μm ), MAO‐B (IC₅₀=0.059±0.002 μm ), and AChE (IC₅₀=0.0087±0.0002 μm ) inhibition without neurotoxicity. Kinetic studies revealed that compound 16 exhibits competitive and reversible inhibition against MAO‐A and MAO‐B, and mixed‐type inhibition against AChE. Molecular docking studies further revealed insight into the possible interactions within the enzyme–inhibitor complexes. The most active compounds were found to interact with the enzymes through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Additionally, in silico molecular properties and ADME properties of the synthesized compounds were calculated to explore their drug‐like characteristics.     

Synthesis of novel 3‐hetaryl‐substituted 6‐ and 8‐hydroxybenzo[f]coumarin derivatives

Eight novel 3‐hetaryl‐substituted 6‐ and 8‐hydroxybenzo[f]iminocoumarin compounds were synthesised by the reaction of 2,5‐dihydroxynaphthaldehydes or 2,7‐dihydroxynaphthaldehydes with 2‐cyanomethylbenzo‐thiazole, 2‐cyanomethylbenzoimidazole, 1‐methyl‐2‐cyanomethylbenzoimidazole and 2‐cyanomethyl‐4‐phenylthiazole. The iminocompounds obtained were hydrolysed with hydrochloric acid to the benzo[f]coumarins. Becaue of the high reactivity of the iminocoumarins, only mixtures which also contained the corresponding coumarin compounds were isolated. The absorption and steady‐state fluorescence characteristics of the benzo[f]coumarins (benzo[f]chromen‐2‐ones) synthesised were studied in ethanol and in toluene.     

5‐Benzylidenethiazolidin‐4‐ones as Multitarget Inhibitors of Bacterial Mur Ligases

Mur ligases participate in the intracellular path of bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis and constitute attractive, although so far underexploited, targets for antibacterial drug discovery. A series of hydroxy‐substituted 5‐benzylidenethiazolidin‐4‐ones were synthesized and tested as inhibitors of Mur ligases. The most potent compound 5 a was active against MurD–F with IC₅₀ values between 2 and 6 μm, making it a promising multitarget inhibitor of Mur ligases. Antibacterial activity against different strains, inhibitory activity against protein kinases, mutagenicity and genotoxicity of 5 a were also investigated, and kinetic and NMR studies were conducted.     

Synthesis and Structure–Activity Relationship Studies of Derivatives of the Dual Aromatase–Sulfatase Inhibitor 4‐{[(4‐Cyanophenyl)(4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)amino]methyl}phenyl sulfamate

4‐{[(4‐Cyanophenyl)(4H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)amino]methyl}phenyl sulfamate and its ortho‐halogenated (F, Cl, Br) derivatives are first‐generation dual aromatase and sulfatase inhibitors (DASIs). Structure–activity relationship studies were performed on these compounds, and various modifications were made to their structures involving relocation of the halogen atom, introduction of more halogen atoms, replacement of the halogen with another group, replacement of the methylene linker with a difluoromethylene linker, replacement of the para‐cyanophenyl ring with other ring structures, and replacement of the triazolyl group with an imidazolyl group. The most potent in vitro DASI discovered is an imidazole derivative with IC₅₀ values against aromatase and steroid sulfatase in a JEG‐3 cell preparation of 0.2 and 2.5 nM , respectively. The parent phenol of this compound inhibits aromatase with an IC₅₀ value of 0.028 nM in the same assay.     

8‐Benzyltetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones: Water‐Soluble Tricyclic Xanthine Derivatives as Multitarget Drugs for Neurodegenerative Diseases

8‐Benzyl‐substituted tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purinediones were designed as tricyclic xanthine derivatives containing a basic nitrogen atom in the tetrahydropyrazine ring to improve water solubility. A library of 69 derivatives was prepared and evaluated in radioligand binding studies at adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes and for their ability to inhibit monoamine oxidases (MAO). Potent dual‐target‐directed A₁/A_2A adenosine receptor antagonists were identified. Several compounds showed triple‐target inhibition; one of the best compounds was 8‐(2,4‐dichloro‐5‐fluorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione ( 72 ) (human AR: K_i A₁ 217 nM , A_2A 233 nM ; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 508 nM ). Dichlorinated compound 36 [8‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzyl)‐1,3‐dimethyl‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydropyrazino[2,1‐f]purine‐2,4(1H,3H)‐dione] was found to be the best triple‐target drug in rat (K_i A₁ 351 nM , A_2A 322 nm; IC₅₀ MAO‐B: 260 nM ), and may serve as a useful tool for preclinical proof‐of‐principle studies. Compounds that act at multiple targets relevant for symptomatic as well as disease‐modifying treatment of neurodegenerative diseases are expected to show advantages over single‐target therapeutics.     

Design,Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of 3‐Benzazepin‐1‐ols as NR2B‐Selective NMDA Receptor Antagonists

Cleavage and reconstitution of a bond in the piperidine ring of ifenprodil ( 1 ) leads to 7‐methoxy‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐3‐benzazepin‐1‐ols, a novel class of NR2B‐selective NMDA receptor antagonists. The secondary amine 7‐methoxy‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1H‐3‐benzazepin‐1‐ol ( 12 ), which was synthesized in six steps starting from 2‐phenylethylamine 3 , represents the central building block for the introduction of several N‐linked residues. A distance of four methylene units between the basic nitrogen atom and the phenyl residue in the side chain results in high NR2B affinity. The 4‐phenylbutyl derivative 13 (WMS‐1405, K_i=5.4 nM ) and the conformationally restricted 4‐phenylcyclohexyl derivative 31 (K_i=10 nM ) represent the most potent NR2B ligands of this series. Whereas 13 shows excellent selectivity, the 4‐phenylcyclohexyl derivative 31 also interacts with σ₁ (K_i=33 nM ) and σ₂ receptors (K_i=82 nM ). In the excitotoxicity assay the phenylbutyl derivative 13 inhibits the glutamate‐induced cytotoxicity with an IC₅₀ value of 360 nM , indicating that 13 is an NMDA antagonist.     

Discovery of Adamantyl Ethanone Derivatives as Potent 11β‐Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 (11β‐HSD1) Inhibitors

11β‐Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (11β‐HSDs) are key enzymes regulating the pre‐receptor metabolism of glucocorticoid hormones. The modulation of 11β‐HSD type 1 activity with selective inhibitors has beneficial effects on various conditions including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and obesity. Inhibition of tissue‐specific glucocorticoid action by regulating 11β‐HSD1 constitutes a promising treatment for metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. A series of novel adamantyl ethanone compounds was identified as potent inhibitors of human 11β‐HSD1. The most active compounds identified ( 52 , 62 , 72 , 92 , 103 and 104 ) display potent inhibition of 11β‐HSD1 with IC₅₀ values in the 50–70 nM range. Compound 72 also proved to be metabolically stable when incubated with human liver microsomes. Furthermore, compound 72 showed very weak inhibitory activity for human cytochrome P450 enzymes and is therefore a candidate for in vivo studies. Comparison of the publicly available X‐ray crystal structures of human 11β‐HSD1 led to docking studies of the potent compounds, revealing how these molecules may interact with the enzyme and cofactor.     

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 1‐Methyl‐1H‐indole–Pyrazoline Hybrids as Potential Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors

A series of 1‐methyl‐1H‐indole–pyrazoline hybrids were designed, synthesized, and biologically evaluated as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors. Among them, compound e19 [5‐(5‐bromo‐1‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)‐3‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazole‐1‐carboxamide] showed the most potent inhibitory effect on tubulin assembly (IC₅₀=2.12 μm ) and in vitro growth inhibitory activity against a panel of four human cancer cell lines (IC₅₀ values of 0.21–0.31 μm ). Further studies confirmed that compound e19 can induce HeLa cell apoptosis, cause cell‐cycle arrest in G₂/M phase, and disrupt the cellular microtubule network. These studies, along with molecular docking and 3D‐QSAR modeling, provide an important basis for further optimization of compound e19 as a potential anticancer agent.