Structure-activity relationships and mechanism of action of Eph-ephrin antagonists: interaction of cholanic acid with the EphA2 receptor

The Eph-ephrin system, including the EphA2 receptor and the ephrinA1 ligand, plays a critical role in tumor and vascular functions during carcinogenesis. We previously identified (3α,5β)-3-hydroxycholan-24-oic acid (lithocholic acid) as an Eph-ephrin antagonist that is able to inhibit EphA2 receptor activation; it is therefore potentially useful as a novel EphA2 receptor-targeting agent. Herein we explore the structure-activity relationships of a focused set of lithocholic acid derivatives based on molecular modeling investigations and displacement binding assays. Our exploration shows that while the 3-α-hydroxy group of lithocholic acid has a negligible role in recognition of the EphA2 receptor, its carboxylate group is critical for disrupting the binding of ephrinA1 to EphA2. As a result of our investigation, we identified (5β)-cholan-24-oic acid (cholanic acid) as a novel compound that competitively inhibits the EphA2-ephrinA1 interaction with higher potency than lithocholic acid. Surface plasmon resonance analysis indicates that cholanic acid binds specifically and reversibly to the ligand binding domain of EphA2, with a steady-state dissociation constant (K(D) ) in the low micromolar range. Furthermore, cholanic acid blocks the phosphorylation of EphA2 as well as cell retraction and rounding in PC3 prostate cancer cells, two effects that depend on EphA2 activation by the ephrinA1 ligand. These findings suggest that cholanic acid can be used as a template structure for the design of effective EphA2 antagonists, and may have potential impact in the elucidation of the role played by this receptor in pathological conditions.     

Design,Synthesis, and Structure–Activity Relationships of 3,4,5‐Trisubstituted 4,5‐Dihydro‐1,2,4‐oxadiazoles as TGR5 Agonists

Given its role in the mediation of energy and glucose homeostasis, the G‐protein‐coupled bile acid receptor 1 (TGR5) is considered a potential target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and other metabolic disorders. By thorough analysis of diverse structures of published TGR5 agonists, a hypothetical ligand‐based pharmacophore model was built, and a new class of potent TGR5 agonists, based on the novel 3,4,5‐trisubstituted 4,5‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐oxadiazole core, was discovered by rational design. Three distinct synthetic methods for constructing 4,5‐dihydro‐1,2,4‐oxadiazoles and extensive structure–activity relationship studies are reported herein. Compound (R)‐ 54 n , the structure of which was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and quantum chemical solid‐state TDDFT‐ECD calculations, showed the best potency, with an EC₅₀ value of 1.4 nM toward hTGR5. Its favorable properties in vitro warrant further investigation.     

Development of Selective TGR5 Ligands Based on the 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethylnaphthalene Skeleton

TGR5, a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), plays an important role in several physiological functions. TGR5 activation through bile acids induces an increase in energy expenditure. Therefore, synthetic TGR5 ligands could be useful for the treatment of obesity or dyslipidemia. In this study, we designed and synthesized a set of TGR5 ligands with a 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethylnaphthalene (TMN) skeleton, and evaluated their TGR5 agonistic activity. We also investigated the selectivity of the synthesized compounds for TGR5 relative to the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and retinoic acid receptor (RAR). Our results show that compound 4 b [N-(2-chlorophenyl)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenecarboxamide] exhibited potent TGR5 agonist activity with an IC₅₀ value of 8.4 nM without significant cytotoxicity. In addition, compound 4 b showed only slight agonistic activity toward FXR and RAR at 1 μM treatment. These data indicate that compound 4 b is a selective TGR5 agonist, and could be a promising therapeutic agent for dyslipidemia.     

Design,Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Nonsteroidal Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Antagonists: Molecular Basis of FXR Antagonism

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) plays an important role in the regulation of cholesterol, lipid, and glucose metabolism. Recently, several studies on the molecular basis of FXR antagonism have been reported. However, none of these studies employs an FXR antagonist with nonsteroidal scaffold. On the basis of our previously reported FXR antagonist with a trisubstituted isoxazole scaffold, a novel nonsteroidal FXR ligand was designed and used as a lead for structural modification. In total, 39 new trisubstituted isoxazole derivatives were designed and synthesized, which led to pharmacological profiles ranging from agonist to antagonist toward FXR. Notably, compound 5s (4′‐[(3‐{[3‐(2‐chlorophenyl)‐5‐(2‐thienyl)isoxazol‐4‐yl]methoxy}‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]biphenyl‐2‐carboxylic acid), containing a thienyl‐substituted isoxazole ring, displayed the best antagonistic activity against FXR with good cellular potency (IC₅₀=12.2±0.2 μM ). Eventually, this compound was used as a probe in a molecular dynamics simulation assay. Our results allowed us to propose an essential molecular basis for FXR antagonism, which is consistent with a previously reported antagonistic mechanism; furthermore, E467 on H12 was found to be a hot‐spot residue and may be important for the future design of nonsteroidal antagonists of FXR.     

Discovery of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors by Docking into an Inactive Kinase Conformation Generated by Molecular Dynamics

Several small molecules that bind to the inactive DFG‐out conformation of tyrosine kinases (called type II inhibitors) have shown a good selectivity profile over other kinase targets. To obtain a set of DFG‐out structures, we performed an explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the complex of the catalytic domain of a tyrosine kinase receptor, ephrin type‐A receptor 3 (EphA3), and a manually docked type II inhibitor. Automatic docking of four previously reported type II inhibitors was used to select a single snapshot from the MD trajectory for virtual screening. High‐throughput docking of a pharmacophore‐tailored library of 175 000 molecules resulted in about 4 million poses, which were further filtered by van der Waals efficiency and ranked according to a force‐field‐based energy function. Notably, around 20 % of the compounds with predicted binding energy smaller than ?10 kcal mol^?1 are known type II inhibitors. Moreover, a series of 5‐(piperazine‐1‐yl)isoquinoline derivatives was identified as a novel class of low‐micromolar inhibitors of EphA3 and unphosphorylated Abelson tyrosine kinase (Abl1). The in silico predicted binding mode of the new inhibitors suggested a similar affinity to the gatekeeper mutant T315I of Abl1, which was verified in vitro by using a competition binding assay. Additional evidence for the type II binding mode was obtained by two 300 ns MD simulations of the complex between N‐(3‐chloro‐4‐(difluoromethoxy)phenyl)‐2‐(4‐(8‐nitroisoquinolin‐5‐yl)piperazin‐1‐yl)acetamide and EphA3.     

Binding Kinetics of ZM241385 Derivatives at the Human Adenosine A2A Receptor

Classical drug design and development rely mostly on affinity‐ or potency‐driven structure–activity relationships (SAR). Thus far, a given compound’s binding kinetics have been largely ignored, the importance of which is now being increasingly recognized. In the present study, we performed an extensive structure–kinetics relationship (SKR) study in addition to a traditional SAR analysis at the adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR). The ensemble of 24 A_2AR compounds, all triazolotriazine derivatives resembling the prototypic antagonist ZM241385 (4‐(2‐((7‐amino‐2‐(furan‐2‐yl)‐[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5‐a][1,3,5]triazin‐5‐yl)amino)ethyl)phenol), displayed only minor differences in affinity, although they varied substantially in their dissociation rates from the receptor. We believe that such a combination of SKR and SAR analyses, as we have done with the A_2AR, will have general importance for the superfamily of G protein‐coupled receptors, as it can serve as a new strategy to tailor the interaction between ligand and receptor.     

Heterotypic Sam–Sam Association between Odin‐Sam1 and Arap3‐Sam: Binding Affinity and Structural Insights

Arap3 is a phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase effector protein that plays a role as GTPase activator (GAP) for Arf6 and RhoA. Arap3 contains a sterile alpha motif (Sam) domain that has high sequence homology with the Sam domain of the EphA2‐receptor (EphA2‐Sam). Both Arap3‐Sam and EphA2‐Sam are able to associate with the Sam domain of the lipid phosphatase Ship2 (Ship2‐Sam). Recently, we reported a novel interaction between the first Sam domain of Odin (Odin‐Sam1), a protein belonging to the ANKS (ANKyrin repeat and Sam domain containing) family, and EphA2‐Sam. In our latest work, we applied NMR spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to characterize the association between Arap3‐Sam and Odin‐Sam1. We show that these two Sam domains interact with low micromolar affinity. Moreover, by means of molecular docking techniques, supported by NMR data, we demonstrate that Odin‐Sam1 and Arap3‐Sam might bind with a topology that is common to several Sam‐Sam complexes. The revealed structural details form the basis for the design of potential peptide antagonists that could be used as chemical tools to investigate functional aspects related to heterotypic Arap3‐Sam associations.     

A Novel Class of Natural FXR Modulators with a Unique Mode of Selective Co‐regulator Assembly

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is an important target for drug discovery. Small molecules induce a conformational change in FXR that modulates its binding to co‐regulators, thus resulting in distinct FXR functional profiles. However, the mechanisms for selectively recruiting co‐regulators by FXR remain elusive, partly because of the lack of FXR‐selective modulators. We report the identification of two natural terpenoids, tschimgine and feroline, as novel FXR modulators. Remarkably, their crystal structures uncovered a secondary binding pocket important for ligand binding. Further, tschimgine or feroline induced dynamic conformational changes in the activation function 2 (AF‐2) surface, thus leading to differential co‐regulator recruiting profiles, modulated by both hydrophobic and selective hydrogen‐bond interactions unique to specific co‐regulators. Our findings thus provide a novel structure template for optimization for FXR‐selective modulators of clinical value.     

Structural and Functional Insights into the Transmembrane Domain Association of Eph Receptors

Eph receptors are the largest family of receptor tyrosine kinases and by interactions with ephrin ligands mediate a myriad of processes from embryonic development to adult tissue homeostasis. The interaction of Eph receptors, especially at their transmembrane (TM) domains is key to understanding their mechanism of signal transduction across cellular membranes. We review the structural and functional aspects of EphA1/A2 association and the techniques used to investigate their TM domains: NMR, molecular modelling/dynamics simulations and fluorescence. We also introduce transmembrane peptides, which can be used to alter Eph receptor signaling and we provide a perspective for future studies.     

Peptide Fragments of Odin‐Sam1: Conformational Analysis and Interaction Studies with EphA2‐Sam

Odin is a protein belonging to the ANKS family, and has two tandem Sam domains. The first, Odin‐Sam1, binds to the Sam domain of the EphA2 receptor (EphA2‐Sam); this interaction could be crucial for the regulation of receptor endocytosis and might have an impact on cancer. Odin‐Sam1 associates with EphA2‐Sam by adopting a “mid‐loop/end‐helix” model. In this study three peptide sequences, encompassing the mid‐loop interacting portion of Odin‐Sam1 and its C‐terminal α5 helix, were designed. Their conformational properties were analyzed by CD and NMR. In addition, their abilities to interact with EphA2‐Sam were investigated by SPR studies. The peptides adopt a predominantly disordered state in aqueous buffer, but a higher helical content is evident in the presence of the cosolvent trifluoroethanol. Dissociation constants towards EphA2‐Sam were in the high micromolar range. The structural findings suggest further routes for the design of potential anti‐cancer therapeutics as inhibitors of EphA2‐Sam heterotypic interactions.     

Synthesis and evaluation of a fluorescent non-peptidic cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptor specific antagonist for cancer cell imaging

Fluorescent labeling has enabled a better understanding of the relationships between receptor location, function, and life cycle. Each of these perspectives contributes new insights into drug action, particularly for G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). The aim of this study was to develop a fluorescein derivative, FLUO‐QUIN—a novel antagonist of the cholecystokinin‐B/gastrin receptor. A radioligand‐binding experiment revealed an IC₅₀ of 4.79 nm, and the antagonist inhibited gastric acid secretion in an isolated lumen‐perfused mouse stomach assay (up to 51 % at 100 nm) . The fluorescence properties altered upon binding to the receptor, and the fluorophore was quenched to a greater extent when free than in the bound form. FLUO‐QUIN specifically bound to human pancreatic carcinoma cells, MiaPaca‐2, which are known to express the receptor, as evidenced by rapid clustering followed by time‐dependent receptor internalization. This proves the stability of FLUO‐QUIN and its ability to penetrate vesicular membranes and reach various cell targets. Hence it might be used as an agent for the detection of CCK‐B‐receptor‐positive tumors by fluorescence imaging.     

The Predicted Ensemble of Low‐Energy Conformations of Human Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 5 and the Binding of Antagonists

Human somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (hSSTR5) regulates cell proliferation and hormone secretion. However, the identification of effective therapeutic small‐molecule ligands is impeded because experimental structures are not available for any SSTR subtypes. Here, we predict the ensemble of low‐energy 3D structures of hSSTR5 using a modified GPCR Ensemble of Structures in Membrane BiLayer Environment (GEnSeMBLE) complete sampling computational method. We find that this conformational ensemble displays most interhelical interactions conserved in class A G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) plus seven additional interactions (e.g., Y2.43–D3.49, T3.38–S4.53, K5.64–Y3.51) likely conserved among SSTRs. We then predicted the binding sites for a series of five known antagonists, leading to predicted binding energies consistent with experimental results reported in the literature. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of 50 ns in explicit water and lipid retained the predicted ligand‐bound structure and formed new interaction patterns (e.g. R3.50–T6.34) consistent with the inactive μ‐opioid receptor X‐ray structure. We suggest more than six mutations for experimental validation of our prediction. The final predicted receptor conformations and antagonist binding sites provide valuable insights for designing new small‐molecule drugs targeting SSTRs.     

Inhibition of EphA2 by Dasatinib Suppresses Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury

Radiation-induced multiorgan dysfunction is thought to result primarily from damage to the endothelial system, leading to a systemic inflammatory response that is mediated by the recruitment of leukocytes. The Eph–ephrin signaling pathway in the vascular system participates in various disease developmental processes, including cancer and inflammation. In this study, we demonstrate that radiation exposure increased intestinal inflammation via endothelial dysfunction, caused by the radiation-induced activation of EphA2, an Eph receptor tyrosine kinase, and its ligand ephrinA1. Barrier dysfunction in endothelial and epithelial cells was aggravated by vascular endothelial–cadherin disruption and leukocyte adhesion in radiation-induced inflammation both in vitro and in vivo. Among all Eph receptors and their ligands, EphA2 and ephrinA1 were required for barrier destabilization and leukocyte adhesion. Knockdown of EphA2 in endothelial cells reduced radiation-induced endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of EphA2–ephrinA1 by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib attenuated the loss of vascular integrity and leukocyte adhesion in vitro. Mice administered dasatinib exhibited resistance to radiation injury characterized by reduced barrier leakage and decreased leukocyte infiltration into the intestine. Taken together, these data suggest that dasatinib therapy represents a potential approach for the protection of radiation-mediated intestinal damage by targeting the EphA2–ephrinA1 complex.     

Ligand-binding domain of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) had the highest sensitivity and activity among FXR variants in a fluorescence-based assay

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR, NR1H4) has been recognized as an attractive therapeutic target because it is a nuclear hormone receptor that controls the expression level of cholesterol-7α-hydroxylase, which in turn regulates bile acid production and cholesterol excretion. To compare receptor activity between each domain and the full-length protein, human FXR cDNA was cloned from a human liver cDNA library. Three human FXR cDNA, designated FXR₂₀, FXR₃₃, and FXR₅₃ cDNA, were subcloned and ligated into a pET28a expression vector. Each protein was expressed in Escherichia coli (BL21) and purified by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column chromatography. Approximately 5 mg of FXR₃₃ (1–182 amino acids deleted from FXR, 37 kDa) and 2 mg of FXR₅₃ (the full-length protein of FXR, 59 kDa) was purified from 1 L of Luria-Bertani culture, achieving at least 90% purity. The coactivator recruitment assay for FXR activation was carried out with the three variants of the FXR protein by using dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluoroimmunoassay-europium-N¹-labeled anti-His antibody. From an optimized assay, a saturated hyperbolic fluorescence signal curve was produced when 250 nM of FXR₃₃ and 100 nM of steroid receptor coactivator-1 peptide, a coactivator of FXR consisting of 26 amino acids, were used with a concentration dependence on chenodeoxycholic acid (from 0 to 200 μM). The ligand-binding domain of FXR (FXR₃₃) was the most suitable protein for studying the activation of FXR with a fluorescence-based assay, because it showed better structural stability than either the full length of FXR (FXR₅₃) or the DNA-binding domain of FXR (FXR₂₀).     

Targeting G Protein‐Coupled Receptors by Capture Compound Mass Spectrometry: A Case Study with Sertindole

Unbiased chemoproteomic profiling of small‐molecule interactions with endogenous proteins is important for drug discovery. For meaningful results, all protein classes have to be tractable, including G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors are hardly tractable by affinity pulldown from lysates. We report a capture compound (CC)‐based strategy to target and identify GPCRs directly from living cells. We synthesized CCs with sertindole attached to the CC scaffold in different orientations to target the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) heterologously expressed in HEK 293 cells. The structure–activity relationship of sertindole for DRD2 binding was reflected in the activities of the sertindole CCs in radioligand displacement, cell‐based assays, and capture compound mass spectrometry (CCMS). The activity pattern was rationalized by molecular modelling. The most‐active CC showed activities very similar to that of unmodified sertindole. A concentration of DRD2 in living cells well below 100 fmol used as an experimental input was sufficient for unambiguous identification of captured DRD2 by mass spectrometry. Our new CCMS workflow broadens the arsenal of chemoproteomic technologies to close a critical gap for the comprehensive characterization of drug–protein interactions.     

Ursodeoxycholic Acid Suppresses Lipogenesis in Mouse Liver: Possible Role of the Decrease in β-Muricholic Acid,a Farnesoid X Receptor Antagonist

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a major nuclear receptor of bile acids; its activation suppresses sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP1c)-mediated lipogenesis and decreases the lipid contents in the liver. There are many reports showing that the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) suppresses lipogenesis and reduces the lipid contents in the liver of experimental animals. Since UDCA is not recognized as an FXR agonist, these effects of UDCA cannot be readily explained by its direct activation of FXR. We observed that the dietary administration of UDCA in mice decreased the expression levels of SREBP1c and its target lipogenic genes. Alpha- and β-muricholic acids (MCA) and cholic acid (CA) were the major bile acids in the mouse liver but their contents decreased upon UDCA administration. The hepatic contents of chenodeoxycholic acid and deoxycholic acid (DCA) were relatively low but were not changed by UDCA. UDCA did not show FXR agonistic or antagonistic potency in in vitro FXR transactivation assay. Taking these together, we deduced that the above-mentioned change in hepatic bile acid composition induced upon UDCA administration might cause the relative increase in the FXR activity in the liver, mainly by the reduction in the content of β-MCA, a farnesoid X receptor antagonist, which suggests a mechanism by which UDCA suppresses lipogenesis and decreases the lipid contents in the mouse liver.     

When Two Become One: Conformational Changes in FXR/RXR Heterodimers Bound to Steroidal Antagonists

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear receptor with an essential role in regulating bile acid synthesis and cholesterol homeostasis. FXR activation by agonists is explained by an αAF-2-trapping mechanism; however, antagonism mechanisms are diverse. We discuss microsecond molecular dynamics (MD) simulations investigating our recently reported FXR antagonists 2a and 2 h. We study the antagonist-induced conformational changes in the FXR ligand-binding domain, when compared to the synthetic (GW4064) or steroidal (chenodeoxycholic acid, CDCA) FXR agonists in the FXR monomer or FXR/RXR heterodimer r, and in the presence and absence of the coactivator. Our MD data suggest ligand-specific influence on conformations of different FXR-LBD regions, including the α5/α6 region, αAF-2, and α9-11. Changes in the heterodimerization interface induced by antagonists seem to be associated with αAF-2 destabilization, which prevents both co-activator and co-repressor recruitment. Our results provide new insights into the conformational behaviour of FXR, suggesting that FXR antagonism/agonism shift requires a deeper assessment than originally proposed by crystal structures.     

Dietary Hyodeoxycholic Acid Exerts Hypolipidemic Effects by Reducing Farnesoid X Receptor Antagonist Bile Acids in Mouse Enterohepatic Tissues

Mice were fed a control diet or a diet supplemented with hyodeoxycholic acid, the most abundant bile acid contained in pig bile, for 4 weeks, after which their serum and livers were collected. The contents of total fatty acids of serum and liver cholesteryl esters, and of liver triglycerides, were reduced following the administration of the hyodeoxycholic acid‐supplemented diet, which was mainly due to the reductions in the contents of monounsaturated fatty acids. Free cholesterol contents in the serum and liver were not changed by hyodeoxycholic acid administration. Hyodeoxycholic acid administration reduced the gene expression levels of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1c, acetyl‐CoA carboxylase, fatty acid synthase, and stearoyl‐CoA desaturase‐1. Hyodeoxycholic acid administration markedly changes the ratio of FXR‐antagonist/FXR‐agonist bile acids in the enterohepatic tissues of the mice (1.13 and 7.60 in hyodeoxycholic acid and control diet groups, respectively). Our findings demonstrate that hyodeoxycholic acid administration exerts the hypolipidemic effect in mice, in which downregulations of de novo lipogenesis and desaturation of saturated fatty acids are suggested to play important roles. In addition, regulation of FXR activation through the selective modification of the enterohepatic bile acid pool may be involved in the hypolipidemic effect of hyodeoxycholic acid administration.     

GluN2B‐Selective N‐Methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists Derived from 3‐Benzazepines: Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amines

Given their high neuroprotective potential, ligands that block GluN2B‐containing N‐methyl‐D ‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors by interacting with the ifenprodil binding site located on the GluN2B subunit are of great interest for the treatment of various neuronal disorders. In this study, a novel class of GluN2B‐selective NMDA receptor antagonists with the benzo[7]annulene scaffold was prepared and pharmacologically evaluated. The key intermediate, N‐(2‐methoxy‐5‐oxo‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐yl)acetamide ( 11 ), was obtained by cyclization of 3‐acetamido‐5‐(3‐methoxyphenyl)pentanoic acid ( 10 b ). The final reaction steps comprise hydrolysis of the amide, reduction of the ketone, and reductive alkylation, leading to cis‐ and trans‐configured 7‐(ω‐phenylalkylamino)benzo[7]annulen‐5‐ols. High GluN2B affinity was observed with cis‐configured γ‐amino alcohols substituted with a 3‐phenylpropyl moiety at the amino group. Removal of the benzylic hydroxy moiety led to the most potent GluN2B antagonists of this series: 2‐methoxy‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 20 a , K_i=10 nM ) and 2‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐(3‐phenylpropyl)‐6,7,8,9‐tetrahydro‐5H‐benzo[7]annulen‐7‐amine ( 23 a , K_i=7.9 nM ). The selectivity over related receptors (phencyclidine binding site of the NMDA receptor, σ₁ and σ₂ receptors) was recorded. In a functional assay measuring the cytoprotective activity of the benzo[7]annulenamines, all tested compounds showed potent NMDA receptor antagonistic activity. Cytotoxicity induced via GluN2A subunit‐containing NMDA receptors was not inhibited by the new ligands.     

Structure Modification of FXR Antagonistic Chalcones and Their Inhibitory Effects on NSCLC Cell Proliferation and Metastasis

Although the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) has been regarded as a promising drug target for metabolic diseases as well as anti-inflammatory, antitumor and antiviral actions, the antagonism by FXR ligands are still underrepresented in current FXR targeted therapies. In this study, we discovered selective FXR antagonists through structure optimization from the polyoxygenated chalcone scaffold. The selective antagonist 6 p [2-methoxy-2’-hydroxy-4’-(4’’-methoxy-4’’-oxo-E-crotonyl) chalcone] is not only inhibitory toward non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell proliferation in an FXR-dependent manner, but is also active in metastasis models. Taken together, this chalcone-based FXR antagonist has the potential for the targeted therapy of NSCLC in which FXR is highly expressed.