An experimental investigation on a DI diesel engine using waste plastic oil with exhaust gas recirculation

Environmental degradation and depleting oil reserves are matters of great concern around the globe. Developing countries like India depend heavily on oil import of about 125 Mt per annum (7:1 diesel/gasoline). Diesel being the main transport fuel in India, finding a suitable alternative to diesel is an urgent need. In this context, waste plastic solid is currently receiving renewed interest. Waste plastic oil is suitable for compression ignition engines and more attention is focused in India because of its potential to generate large-scale employment and relatively low environmental degradation. The present investigation was to study the effect of cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on four stroke, single cylinder, direct injection (DI) diesel engine using 100% waste plastic oil. Experimental results showed higher oxides of nitrogen emissions when fueled with waste plastic oil without EGR. NO_x emissions were reduced when the engine was operated with cooled EGR. The EGR level was optimized as 20% based on significant reduction in NO_x emissions, minimum possible smoke, CO, HC emissions and comparable brake thermal efficiency. Smoke emissions of waste plastic oil were higher at all loads. Combustion parameters were found to be comparable with and without EGR. Compression ignition engines run on waste plastic oil are found to emit higher oxides of nitrogen.     

An experimental study for the effects of boost pressure on the performance and exhaust emissions of a DI-HCCI gasoline engine

As an alternative combustion mode, the HCCI combustion has some benefits compared to conventional SI and CI engines, such as low NO_x emission and high thermal efficiency. However, this combustion mode can produce higher UHC and CO emissions than those of conventional engines. In the naturally aspirated HCCI engines, the low engine output power limits its use in the current engine technologies. Intake air pressure boosting is a common way to improve the engine output power which is widely used in high performance SI and CI engine applications. Therefore, in this study, the effect of inlet air pressure on the performance and exhaust emissions of a DI-HCCI gasoline engine has been investigated after converting a heavy-duty diesel engine to a HCCI direct-injection gasoline engine. The experiments were performed at three different inlet air pressures while operating the engine at the same equivalence ratio and intake air temperature as in normally aspirated HCCI engine condition at different engine speeds. The SOI timing was set dependently to achieve the maximum engine torque at each test condition. The effects of inlet air pressure both on the emissions such as CO, UHC and NO_x and on the performance parameters such as BSFC, torque, thermal and combustion efficiencies have been discussed. The relationships between the emissions are also provided.     

Comparison of emissions of a direct injection diesel engine operating on biodiesel with emulsified and fumigated methanol

Biodiesel is an alternative fuel for internal combustion engines. It can reduce carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) and particulate matter (PM) emissions, compared with diesel fuel, but there is also an increase in nitrogen oxides (NO_x) emission. This study is aimed to compare the effect of applying a biodiesel with either 10% blended methanol or 10% fumigation methanol. The biodiesel used in this study was converted from waste cooking oil. Experiments were performed on a 4-cylinder naturally aspirated direct injection diesel engine operating at a constant speed of 1800 rev/min with five different engine loads. The results indicate a reduction of CO₂, NO_x, and particulate mass emissions and a reduction in mean particle diameter, in both cases, compared with diesel fuel. It is of interest to compare the two modes of fueling with methanol in combination with biodiesel. For the blended mode, there is a slightly higher brake thermal efficiency at low engine load while the fumigation mode gives slightly higher brake thermal efficiency at medium and high engine loads. In the fumigation mode, an extra fuel injection control system is required, and there is also an increase in CO, HC and NO₂ (nitrogen dioxide) and particulate emissions in the engine exhaust, which are disadvantages compared with the blended mode.     

Determination of performance and exhaust emissions properties of B75 in a CI engine application

In this study, performance and exhaust emissions of biodiesel in a compression ignition engine was experimentally investigated. Therefore, biodiesel has been made by transesterification from cotton seed oil and then it was mixed with diesel fuel by 25% volumetrically, called here as B75 fuel. B75 fuel was tested, as alternative fuel, in a single cylinder, four strokes, and air-cooled diesel engine. The effect of B75 and diesel fuels on the engine power, engine torque and break specific fuel consumption were clarified by the performance tests. The influences of B75 fuel on CO, HC, NOx, Smoke opacity, CO₂, and O₂ emissions were investigated by emission tests. The engine torque and power, for B75 fuel, were lower than that of diesel fuel in range of 2-3%. However, for the B75, specific fuel consumption was higher than that of diesel fuel by approximately 3%. CO₂, CO, HC, smoke opacity and NO_x emissions of B75 fuel were lower than that of diesel fuel. The experimental results showed that B75 fuel can be substituted for the diesel fuel without any modifications in diesel engines.     

Combustion of n-butanol in a spark-ignition IC engine

Alcohols, because of their potential to be produced from renewable sources and because of their high quality characteristics for spark-ignition (SI) engines, are considered quality fuels which can be blended with fossil-based gasoline for use in internal combustion engines. They enable the transformation of our energy basis in transportation to reduce dependence on fossil fuels as an energy source for vehicles. The research presented in this work is focused on applying n-butanol as a blending agent additive to gasoline to reduce the fossil part in the fuel mixture and in this way to reduce life cycle CO₂ emissions. The impact on combustion processes in a spark-ignited internal combustion engine is also detailed. Blends of n-butanol to gasoline with ratios of 0%, 20%, and 60% in addition to near n-butanol have been studied in a single cylinder cooperative fuels research engine (CFR) SI engine with variable compression ratio manufactured by Waukesha Engine Company. The engine is modified to provide air control and port fuel injection. Engine control and monitoring was performed using a target-based rapid-prototyping system with electronic sensors and actuators installed on the engine [1]. A real-time combustion analysis system was applied for data acquisition and online analysis of combustion quantities. Tests were performed under stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratios, fixed engine torque, and compression ratios of 8:1 and 10:1 with spark timing sweeps from 18° to 4° before top dead center (BTDC). On the basis of the experimental data, combustion characteristics for these fuels have been determined as follows: mass fraction burned (MFB) profile, rate of MFB, combustion duration and location of 50% MFB. Analysis of these data gives conclusions about combustion phasing for optimal spark timing for maximum break torque (MBT) and normalized rate for heat release. Additionally, susceptibility of 20% and 60% butanol-gasoline blends on combustion knock was investigated. Simultaneously, comparison between these fuels and pure gasoline in the above areas was investigated. Finally, on the basis of these conclusions, characteristic of these fuel blends as substitutes of gasoline for a series production engine were discussed.     

Development of Catalysts for Diesel Particulate NO x Reduction

While diesel vehicles feature high fuel economy with low CO₂ emissions, further suppression of particulate matter (PM) and NO _x in the exhaust stream is demanded worldwide. We have been working to develop a new diesel particulate-NO _x reduction (DPNR) system to decrease both PM and NO _x emissions by combining the NO _x storage-reduction catalyst for direct injection gasoline engines with the most advanced engine control technologies. This paper describes the development of the DPNR system, a post-treatment technology for PM and NO _x , which was achieved through a combination of catalysis and engine control technologies.     

Performance and emission characteristics of an CI engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel–bioethanol blends

The paper presents the experimental results obtained concerning performances and pollution of a diesel engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel–ethanol blends compared with diesel fuel in laboratory tests. The main properties of the researched fuels are presented within this paper, in comparison with classical diesel fuel (chemical composition, density, kinematic viscosity, cold filter plugging point, flash point). Engines’ performances were evaluated by determining the brake specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency. For pollution evaluation the emissions of CO, CO₂, NO_x, HC and smoke have been measured. An increasing of brake specific fuel consumption has been observed, especially at lower engines’ loads, with maximum 32.4%, reducing engine brake thermal efficiency with maximum 21.7%. CO emissions decrease, especially at high loads with maximum 59%, on the basis of CO₂ increased emissions. NO_x emissions slightly increase, especially at partial and high loads, meanwhile HC and smoke emissions decrease in all engines’ load cycles.     

The Impact of Ethanol Fuel Blends on PM Emissions from a Light-Duty GDI Vehicle

This study explores the influence of ethanol on particulate matter (PM) emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicles, a technology introduced to improve fuel economy and lower CO₂ emissions, but facing challenges to meet next-generation emissions standards. Because PM formation in GDI engines is sensitive to a number of operating parameters, two engine calibrations are examined to gauge the robustness of the results. As the ethanol level in gasoline increases from 0% to 20%, there is possibly a small (<20%) benefit in PM mass and particle number emissions, but this is within test variability. When the ethanol content increases to >30%, there is a statistically significant 30%–45% reduction in PM mass and number emissions observed for both engine calibrations. Particle size is unaffected by ethanol level. PM composition is primarily elemental carbon; the organic fraction increases from ～5% for E0 to 15% for E45 fuel. Engine-out hydrocarbon and NO_x emissions exhibit 10–20% decreases, consistent with oxygenated fuel additives. These results are discussed in the context of the changing commercial fuel and engine technology landscapes.

Copyright 2012 American Association for Aerosol Research     

Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions

This work compares the performance and emissions from a production 1.0-l, eight-valve, and four-stroke engine fuelled by hydrous ethanol (6.8% water content in ethanol) or 78% gasoline-22% ethanol blend. The engine was tested in a dynamometer bench in compliance with NBR/ISO 1585 standard. The performance parameters investigated were torque, brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), brake power, specific fuel consumption (SFC), and thermal efficiency. Carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO₂), hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NO_X) exhaust emissions levels are also presented. The results showed that torque and BMEP were higher when the gasoline-ethanol blend was used as fuel on low engine speeds. On the other hand, for high engine speeds, higher torque and BMEP were achieved when hydrous ethanol fuel was used. The use of hydrous ethanol caused higher power at high engine speeds, whereas, for low engine speeds, both fuels produced about the same power. Hydrous ethanol produced higher thermal efficiency and higher SFC than the gasoline-ethanol blend throughout all the engine speed range studied. With regard to exhaust emissions hydrous ethanol reduced CO and HC, but increased CO₂ and NO_X levels.     

Effect of hydrogen addition on lean burn performance of a spark-ignited gasoline engine at 800 rpm and low loads

To reduce the fuel consumption and emissions of spark-ignited (SI) engines, hydrogen enrichment was used to improve the performance of a lean burn SI engine operating at low speed and load conditions. A hydrogen port-injection system was mounted on the intake manifolds to introduce hydrogen into the intake ports sequentially while keeping the original gasoline injection system unchanged. A hybrid electronic control unit (HECU) was adopted to control injection timings and durations of gasoline and hydrogen, accomplishing four excess air ratios of 1.00, 1.18, 1.43 and 1.67 and three hydrogen volume fractions in the intake of 3%, 5%, 8%. The experimental results showed that engine brake thermal efficiency and torque output were increased, combustion durations were shortened, cyclic variation and HC emissions were reduced, but NO_x emissions were increased with the increase of hydrogen addition. CO emission was also reduced under lean conditions with hydrogen enrichment.     

Experimental study of the performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine using direct and indirect injection systems and different fuels

An experimental study of the performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine using direct and indirect injection combustion systems are carried out on a same model of two diesel engines fuelled with diesel and the blend of diesel and Chinese pistache biodiesel. The results show that the NO_x emissions from the indirect injection combustion system (ICS) fuelled with diesel are reduced by around two thirds, compared to that from direct injection combustion system (DCS). Smoke emissions from the engine using ICS are all significantly lower than that of DCS, reduced by 70% for diesel; by 50-60% for the blend. The brake thermal efficiencies (BTEs) reduced by 8-10%, compared to that of DCS; the fuel consumptions increased by around 7-9%. It is also found that carbon monoxide (CO) emissions are reduced when the engine run at engine high power outputs, so are the hydrocarbon (HC) emissions from ICS at the peak power outputs. It is found that, when fuelled with the blend, the effects of ICS to the performance and emissions of diesel engine are very similar to that of running with diesel. For ICS engine fuelled with diesel and the blend fuel, the BSFCs for the blend are around 5% higher; the BTEs are around 2-4% lower; the reductions of NO_x from the blend fuel are 5.1-8.4% on average for the ICS; the reductions of smoke from the blend fuel are 26.8-31.7% on average for the ICS. CO emissions are around a half lower; and HC emissions are around one fifth lower, compared to that of fuelling with diesel. Comparing to that of DCS fuelled with diesel, using ICS fuelled with the blended fuel has much lower emissions. NO_x emissions decreased by 65.6% and 66.1%; smoke emissions decreased by 75.7% and 80.2%; CO emissions decreased by 55.8% and 46.0%; HC emissions decreased by 24.9% and 18.9%; with the BSFCs around 14.6-14.9% higher and the BTEs around 9.7-10.0% lower.     

Spark-ignition engine performance with ‘Powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO/H2): A comparison with gasoline and natural gas

Results are presented of tests from a variable compression ratio Ricardo E6 single-cylinder spark-ignition (SI) engine operating on ‘Powergas’—a synthetic fuel consisting mainly of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The tests cover a range of air/fuel ratios from rich to the lean operating limit at different speeds and two different compression ratios. Measured results are given for brake torque, brake specific fuel consumption and the concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NO_x) and total unburnt hydro-carbon (THC) emissions in the exhaust gases. Experimental results indicate that ‘Powergas’ produces about 20 and 30% lower engine power output than natural gas (NG) and gasoline fuelling respectively under similar operating conditions. For ‘Powergas’, concentrations of THC and CO in the exhaust were negligible, but carbon dioxide (CO₂) and NO_x were found to be higher compared to other fuels. The engine simulation program ISIS has been used to simulate some of the exhaust emissions and the results show agreement with the experimental values and help explain the experimental results.     

Effect of biodiesel blends on North American heavy‐duty diesel engine emissions

We conducted an assessment of North American heavy‐duty engine emission test results for biodiesel from 49 experimental studies, including both engine dynamometer and vehicle test results. Comparison with a commercial database showed that the engines in the emissions database are not representative of the existing North American in‐use fleet as of 2007; more than 50% of the tested engines were of 1995 or earlier vintage. Nevertheless, the results show that the use of a common biodiesel blend (B20) consistently reduces emissions of particulate matter, hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide by 10–20%. Tests with B20 show varying effects on oxides of nitrogen (NO_x). If results for pre‐1992 two‐cycle 6V‐92TA(E) engines (which represent 0.2% of the 2007 in‐use fleet but 28% of the engines tested) are removed, then there is no statistical evidence that the average NO_x emissions from B0 and B20 are different (p value of 0.50 for an estimated average increase of 1%). Several researchers have used changes in engine calibration to eliminate any NO_x penalty associated with B20 (in engines that show an increase in NO_x with B20), while still maintaining the advantages of B20 in reducing other pollutants. The emissions effect of B20 on heavy‐duty diesel truck emissions did not show any correlation with model year or type of fuel injection equipment.     

Homogeneous charge compression ignition of LPG and gasoline using variable valve timing in an engine

The combustion characteristics and exhaust emissions in an engine were investigated under homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) operation fueled with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and gasoline with regard to variable valve timing (VVT) and the addition of di-methyl ether (DME). LPG is a low carbon, high octane number fuel. These two features lead to lower carbon dioxide (CO₂) emission and later combustion in an LPG HCCI engine as compared to a gasoline HCCI engine. To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the LPG HCCI engine, experimental results for the LPG HCCI engine are compared with those for the gasoline HCCI engine. LPG was injected at an intake port as the main fuel in a liquid phase using a liquefied injection system, while a small amount of DME was also injected directly into the cylinder during the intake stroke as an ignition promoter. Different intake valve timings and fuel injection amount were tested in order to identify their effects on exhaust emissions and combustion characteristics. Combustion pressure, heat release rate, and indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) were investigated to characterize the combustion performance. The optimal intake valve open (IVO) timing for the maximum IMEP was retarded as the λ_TOTAL was decreased. The start of combustion was affected by the IVO timing and the mixture strength (λ_TOTAL) due to the volumetric efficiency and latent heat of vaporization. At rich operating conditions, the θ_90-20 of the LPG HCCI engine was longer than that of the gasoline HCCI engine. Hydrocarbon (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions were increased as the IVO timing was retarded. However, CO₂ was decreased as the IVO timing was retarded. CO₂ emission of the LPG HCCI engine was lower than that of the gasoline HCCI engine. However, CO and HC emissions of the LPG HCCI engine were higher than those of the gasoline HCCI engine.     

The influence of oxygenated fuels on emissions of aldehydes and ketones from a two-stroke spark ignition engine

A spark-ignited two-stroke chainsaw engine was used to study the influence of pure oxygenated fuels on exhaust emissions of carbonyls (aldehydes and ketones) and regulated emissions, i.e. hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NO_x). Three fuels—methanol, methyl tert-butylether (MTBE), and ethyl tert-butylether (ETBE)—were used in the tests, each at three air/fuel ratios (λ) and the generated emissions were compared to those observed in previous tests with ethanol, aliphatic gasoline, and regular gasoline. Use of all four oxygenated fuels (ETBE, ethanol, methanol and MTBE) resulted in substantially higher total carbonyl emissions (11, 11, 8.9 and 7.8 g/kWh, respectively) than use of both aliphatic and regular gasoline (2.1 and 2.6 g/kWh, respectively). Further, up to 44-fold higher levels of specific carbonyls were generated from the oxygenated fuels than from regular gasoline: significant amounts of formaldehyde were produced from all of the oxygenated fuels, but they were especially high from methanol and MTBE; acetaldehyde was formed in high amounts from ethanol and ETBE; while acetone and methacrolein were formed from both MTBE and ETBE. In addition, increases in λ increased exhaust emissions of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone, and methacrolein in cases where these were the main carbonyls formed. Increasing λ also variously increased, reduced or had no significant effect on emissions of other measured carbonyls. Lower amounts of CO and NO_x emissions were formed from all oxygenates (especially methanol) than from regular gasoline.     

Experimental investigation on dual fuel operation of acetylene in a DI diesel engine

Depletion of fossils fuels and environmental degradation have prompted researchers throughout the world to search for a suitable alternative fuel for diesel engine. One such step is to utilize renewable fuels in diesel engines by partial or total replacement of diesel in dual fuel mode. In this study, acetylene gas has been considered as an alternative fuel for compression ignition engine, which has excellent combustion properties.Investigation has been carried out on a single cylinder, air cooled, direct injection (DI), compression ignition engine designed to develop the rated power output of 4.4 kW at 1500 rpm under variable load conditions, run on dual fuel mode with diesel as injected primary fuel and acetylene inducted as secondary gaseous fuel at various flow rates. Acetylene aspiration resulted in lower thermal efficiency. Smoke, HC and CO emissions reduced, when compared with baseline diesel operation. With acetylene induction, due to high combustion rates, NO_x emission significantly increased. Peak pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise also increased in the dual fuel mode of operation due to higher flame speed. It is concluded that induction of acetylene can significantly reduce smoke, CO and HC emissions with a small penalty on efficiency.     

Engine performance and emission characteristics of a three-phase emulsion of biodiesel produced by peroxidation

Biodiesel, which is produced from vegetable oils, animal fats or used cooking oils, can be used as an alternative fuel for diesel engines. The high oxygen content of biodiesel not only enhances its burning efficiency, but also generally promotes the formation of more nitrogen oxides (NO_x) during the burning process. Fuel emulsification and the use of NO_x inhibitor agents in fuel are considered to be effective in reducing NO_x emissions. In the study reported herein, soybean oil was used as raw oil to produce biodiesel by transesterification reaction accompanied by peroxidation to further improve the fuel properties of the biodiesel, which was water washed and distilled to remove un-reacted methanol, water, and other impurities. The biodiesel product was then emulsified with distilled water and emulsifying surfactant by a high-speed mechanical homogenizer to produce a three-phase oil-droplets-in-water-droplets-in-oil (i.e. O/W/O) biodiesel emulsion and an O/W/O emulsion that contained aqueous ammonia, which is a NO_x inhibitor agent. A four-stroke diesel engine, in combination with an eddy-current dynamometer, was used to investigate the engine performance and emission characteristics of the biodiesel, the O/W/O biodiesel emulsion, the O/W/O biodiesel emulsion that contained aqueous ammonia, and ASTM No. 2D diesel. The experimental results show that the O/W/O emulsion has the lowest carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions, exhaust gas temperature, and heating value, and the largest brake specific fuel consumption, fuel consumption rate, and kinematic viscosity of the four tested fuels. The increase of engine speed causes the increase of equivalence ratio, exhaust gas temperature, CO₂ emissions, fuel consumption rate, and brake specific fuel consumption, but a decrease of NO_x emissions. Moreover, the existence of aqueous ammonia in the O/W/O biodiesel emulsion curtails NO_x formation, thus resulting in the lowest NO_x emissions among the four tested fuels in burning the O/W/O biodiesel emulsion that contained aqueous ammonia.     

Combustion and emissions characteristics of compression-ignition engine using dual ammonia-diesel fuel

This study investigated the combustion and emissions characteristics of a compression-ignition engine using a dual-fuel approach with ammonia and diesel fuel. Ammonia can be regarded as a hydrogen carrier and used as a fuel, and its combustion does not produce carbon dioxide. In this study, ammonia vapor was introduced into the intake manifold and diesel fuel was injected into the cylinder to initiate combustion. The test engine was a four-cylinder, turbocharged diesel engine with slight modifications to the intake manifold for ammonia induction. An ammonia fueling system was developed, and various combinations of ammonia and diesel fuel were successfully tested. One scheme was to use different combinations of ammonia and diesel fuel to achieve a constant engine power. The other was to use a small quantity of diesel fuel and vary the amount of ammonia to achieve variable engine power. Under the constant engine power operation, in order to achieve favorable fuel efficiency, the preferred operation range was to use 40-60% energy provided by diesel fuel in conjunction with 60-40% energy supplied by ammonia. Exhaust carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions using the dual-fuel approach were generally higher than those of using pure diesel fuel to achieve the same power output, while NO_x emissions varied with different fueling combinations. NO_x emissions could be reduced if ammonia accounted for less than 40% of the total fuel energy due to the lower combustion temperature resulting in lower thermal NO_x. If ammonia accounted for the majority of the fuel energy, NO_x emissions increased significantly due to the fuel-bound nitrogen. On the other hand, soot emissions could be reduced significantly if a significant amount of ammonia was used due to the lack of carbon present in the combination of fuels. Despite the overall high ammonia conversion efficiency (nearly 100%), exhaust ammonia emissions ranged from 1000 to 3000 ppmV and further after-treatment will be required due to health concerns. On the other hand, the variable engine power operation resulted in relatively poor fuel efficiency and high exhaust ammonia emissions due to the lack of diesel energy to initiate effective combustion of the lean ammonia-air mixture. The in-cylinder pressure history was also analyzed, and results indicated that ignition delay increased with increasing amounts of ammonia due to its high resistance to autoignition. The peak cylinder pressure also decreased because of the lower combustion temperature of ammonia. It is recommended that further combustion optimization using direct ammonia/diesel injection strategies be performed to increase the combustion efficiency and reduce exhaust ammonia emissions.     

Mitigation of NOx emissions from a jatropha biodiesel fuelled DI diesel engine using antioxidant additives

Biodiesel offers cleaner combustion over conventional diesel fuel including reduced particulate matter, carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbon emissions. However, several studies point to slight increase in NO_x emissions (about 10%) for biodiesel fuel compared with conventional diesel fuel. Use of antioxidant additives is one of the most cost-effective ways to mitigate the formation of prompt NO_x. In this study, the effect of antioxidant additives on NO_x emissions in a jatropha methyl ester fuelled direct injection diesel engine have been investigated experimentally and compared. A survey of literature regarding the causes of biodiesel NO_x effect and control strategies is presented. The antioxidant additives L-ascorbic acid, α tocopherol acetate, butylated hydroxytoluene, p-phenylenediamine and ethylenediamine were tested on computerised Kirloskar-make 4 stroke water cooled single cylinder diesel engine of 4.4 kW rated power. Results showed that antioxidants considered in the present study are effective in controlling the NO_x emissions of biodiesel fuelled diesel engines. A 0.025%-m concentration of p-phenylenediamine additive was optimal as NO_x levels were substantially reduced in the whole load range in comparison with neat biodiesel. However, hydrocarbon and CO emissions were found to have increased by the addition of antioxidants.     

Alternative fuel and gasoline in an SI engine: A comparative study of performance and emissions characteristics

The strict regulation of environmental laws, the price of oil and its restricted resources, has made engine manufacturers use other energy resources instead of oil and its products. Despite the fact that nowadays alternative fuels are not currently widely used in vehicular applications, using these kinds of fuels will be definitely inevitable in the future. In this paper, a computer code is developed in Matlab environment and then its results are validated with experimental data. This simulated engine model could be used as an powerful tool to investigate the performance and emission of a given SI engine fueled by alternative fuels including hydrogen, propane, methane, ethanol and methanol. Also, the superior of alternative fuels is shown by comparing the performance and emissions of alternative fueled engines to those in conventional fueled engines. Eventually, it is concluded that volumetric efficiency of the engine working on hydrogen is the lowest (28% less that gasoline fueled engine), gasoline produce more power than the all being tested alternative fuels and BSFC of methanol is 91% higher than that of gasoline while BSFC of hydrogen is 63% less than gasoline.