Visual correlates of mobility in real world settings in older adults with low vision

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of reducing light level from photopic to mesopic on performance of real world mobility tasks and how performance of these tasks relates to measures of visual sensory and perceptual function. METHODS: The visual functions, acuity, peak letter contrast sensitivity, visual field extent, glare disability, color confusion, motion sensitivity, spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity, scanning ability, and figure-ground discrimination were measured to determine their ability to predict mobility performance of visually impaired adults on indoor hallway and outdoor residential travel routes under photopic and mesopic lighting conditions. RESULTS: Time to complete routes and number of mobility incidents were significantly increased under mesopic conditions. Depending on the task, lighting conditions, and performance measure, predictive models consisting of 4 vision variables were able to account for 30 to 42% of the variance in overall performance. The two most important variables in these models were visual field extent and scanning ability, followed by color confusion, grating contrast sensitivity, or spatial resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing illumination levels from photopic to mesopic has an adverse effect upon mobility in older visually impaired adults. The aspects of vision which best predict performance include measures of sensory and perceptual visual function. The results compare well with those obtained under controlled laboratory conditions.     

Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity)

The functional results (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity) of 19 multifocal (3M design) and 14 all polymethylmethacrylate biconvex monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), 6 mm in optical diameter were compared. Best corrected visual acuity was > or = 8/10 (Monoyer chart) Parinaud 2 in all cases. Major differences of functional performance in favour of monofocal IOLs were found outside standard conditions of vision (low contrast and illumination levels). A significant difference in contrast sensitivity was found for each spatial frequency in favour of multifocal IOLs (0.0016 < p < 0.05). Mesopic vision was statistically higher in the monofocal IOL group (p = 0.0015). Moreover, dynamic visual acuity allowed accurate evaluation of the difference in performance between these two models of implant. In view of these results multifocal IOLs should be reserved for patients with normal psychosensitive adaptation; an ocular pathology that could alter contrast sensitivity or mesopic vision is a contraindication for multifocal IOLs.     

National HIV surveillance in South Africa--1993-1995

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate contrast sensitivity in insulin-resistant obese patients and in aretinopathic diabetic patients. METHODS: Contrast sensitivity was measured at 3 letter sizes (44 x 44, 9 x 9, and 5 x 5 mm) in mesopic (5 candela [cd]/m2) and low photopic (85 cd/m2) vision in 20 dyslipidemic obese patients with insulin resistance, 20 age-matched patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 20 aged-matched healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Significant loss of contrast sensitivity at all 3 letter sizes was observed in low photopic vision (at 44 x 44-mm letter size, control vs obese, P<.002, and control vs diabetic, P<.005; at 9 x 9-mm letter size, control vs obese, P<.02, and control vs diabetic, P<.001; and at 5 x 5-mm letter size, control vs obese, P<.05, and control vs diabetic, P<.005) and mesopic vision (at 44 x 44-mm letter size, control vs diabetic, P<.005; at 9 x 9-mm letter size, control vs obese, P<.005, and control vs diabetic, P<.01; and at 5 x 5-mm letter size, control vs obese, P<.005, and control vs diabetic, P<.001) in insulin-resistant obese and diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that an early neurosensory dysfunction may occur without visible vascular involvement and without overt hyperglycemia.     

Cone and rod function in cone degenerations

Progressive cone dystrophy (CD) is usually marked in the initial stages by reduced visual acuity, color vision deficiency and alterations in the photopic electroretinogram, while morphological alterations can be very mild; in some forms rods are affected in a later stage as well. We examined 40 patients with progressive cone dystrophy to determine the extent of functional losses in the cone system with psychophysical tests. A great variety of visual acuity and fundus alterations was found. Myopia was present in 74% of the patients. An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance predominated (32%). No prevalence of gender was found. The age of onset ranged between 10 and 30 yr. All patients had progression of their symptoms. The total error score in color arrangement tests, the saturated Farnsworth Panel D-15 and the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test, was pathologic with a predominance of confusions along the tritan and scotopic axis. Especially if visual acuity was below 0.5, color vision defects increased, but color vision defects were also found in patients with normal visual acuity. A general decrease of sensitivity in all three cone mechanisms was observed in measurements of spectral sensitivity. Moreover, cone-cone interaction as tested by transient tritanopia measurements was usually disturbed. In the dark adaptation function the threshold of the cone branch was usually elevated. These tests provide a good means to ascertain the correct diagnosis in early stages of the disease and to monitor progression in patients suffering from cone dystrophy.     

Comparison of methods to assess visual impairment from glare and light scattering with posterior capsule opacification

PURPOSE: To compare 2 glare tests to determine their relative usefulness in the assessment of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and to evaluate the potential benefits of combined visual, acuity, contrast sensitivity, and glare testing. SETTING: Teaching hospital ophthalmology department. METHODS: Sixteen patients had glare, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity testing before and after neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy. Results with the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT, Mentor), which measures disability glare, and the Straylightmeter (Foundation for Eye Research, The Netherlands), which quantifies forward scatter by direct compensation techniques, were compared. The correlation between glare, ETDRS visual acuity, and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity was determined. RESULTS: Pretreatment visual acuity was significantly correlated with contrast sensitivity (P < .01). However, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were poorly correlated with both the BAT and Straylightmeter (P > .05), indicating that visual acuity is predictive of contrast sensitivity but a poor predictor of glare. Glare was significantly improved (Straylightmeter, P < .0001; BAT, P < .05) following capsulotomy. While the Straylightmeter consistently measured precapsulotomy forward scatter that improved with treatment, corresponding BAT disability glare was unmeasurable in 18.8% of patients with PCO, as their visual acuities improved rather than deteriorated with glare testing. CONCLUSIONS: Glare testing provided more information than contrast sensitivity when combined with visual acuity in the evaluation of PCO. Glare related to PCO is better assessed using the Straylightmeter because the BAT may yield aberrant disability glare results.     

Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that small letter contrast sensitivity (CS) is more sensitive than visual acuity (VA) to defocus, luminance, binocular enhancement, and visual differences among pilot trainees. It would be valuable to make this test available for general use. We developed a hard copy (letter chart) version called the Small Letter Contrast Test (SLCT) and evaluated its sensitivity and reliability in comparison to standard vision tests. METHODS: The SLCT has 14 lines of letters with 10 letters per line. The letters are of constant size (20/25 or 4/5 at 4 m), but vary in contrast by line in 0.1 log steps (0.01 log units per letter). Normal room illumination is used. The SLCT was evaluated in 16 subjects under various conditions (spherical and astigmatic blur, low luminance, 2 eyes vs. 1 eye) to determine test sensitivity and reliability, and in patients with clinical conditions. Scores were compared to those obtained with standard tests of VA (Bailey-Lovie) and CS (Pelli-Robson). RESULTS: SLCT scores were similar to previous measures, and retest reliability was one line. The SLCT was more sensitive than VA to spherical and astigmatic blur, low luminance, and vision with two eyes vs. one eye. Greater sensitivity of the SLCT endured despite correction for variability. The SLCT was more sensitive than standard tests to visual loss from early cataract, keratoconus, corneal infiltrates, edema, and amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: The SLCT is a sensitive, adjunctive test, which complements existing measures of VA. It can reveal subtle visual deficits that may be undetected by standard clinical techniques. The SLCT should prove useful for monitoring vision in refractive surgery, corneal and macular edema, optic neuritis, and for selection and evaluation of candidates for occupations requiring unique visual abilities like aviation.     

Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine the effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on best-corrected visual performance using psychophysical tests that were likely to be more sensitive to image degradation than high-contrast Snellen visual acuity. DESIGN: Prospective cases series. PATIENTS: A cohort of 18 subjects with an average of -5.08 diopters (D) of myopia (SD = +/- 1.63 D) was tested before PRK and at 3, 6, and 12 months after PRK. INTERVENTION: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed using a laser (Excimed UV200, Summit Technology, Waltham, Mass) and a polymethylmethacrylate mask; a 5-mm ablation zone was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected high-contrast visual acuity, best-corrected low-contrast visual acuity (18% Weber contrast), and best-corrected letter-contrast sensitivity. Measurements were repeated with dilated pupils and in the presence of a glare source. RESULTS: One year after PRK, the mean best-corrected high-contrast visual acuity was reduced by half a line (P = .01), and the mean best-corrected low-contrast visual acuity was reduced by 1 1/2 lines (P = .002). The losses were somewhat greater when the subject's pupils were dilated and a glare source was used. The reduction in dilated low-contrast visual acuity was positively correlated with the decentration of the ablation zone (r = 0.47), providing evidence of an association between corneal topography and the functional outcome of PRK. CONCLUSION: Low-contrast visual acuity losses after PRK are notably greater than high-contrast visual acuity losses for best-corrected vision. Low-contrast visual acuity is a sensitive measure for gauging the outcome success and safety of refractive surgery.     

Overcoming language barriers when teaching the Advanced Trauma Life Support course

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether blurred vision caused by exposure to triethylamine (TEA) can be detected by the measurement of contrast sensitivity. METHODS: 41 cold box core makers of three foundries and 82 control workers were examined. A detailed ocular and medical history was obtained from the subjects. The contrast sensitivity of the core makers was measured on Monday and Friday of the same week both before and immediately after work and also on a third day, when air samples of TEA were collected. Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity were measured by optotype figures at full contrast, 2.5% contrast, and 0.6% contrast. The changes in contrast sensitivity were used for the analysis. The results of binocular vision and the results of the dominant eye were analysed. Urine specimens for the analysis of TEA were collected on every occasion when contrast sensitivity was measured. RESULTS: 78% of the core makers had had symptoms of blurred vision, and 31% had had trouble driving or working. The breathing zone eight hour time weighted average TEA concentrations were 0.3-60 mg/m3. The mean urinary TEA concentration after the shift was 35 mmol/mol creatinine. Continuous monitoring showed high peaks of TEA leakage at a core making machine. Changes in binocular visual acuity did not differ between the exposed and unexposed workers. The contrast sensitivity decreased in 49% of the core makers and 21% of the controls (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The blurred vision caused by exposure to TEA can be documented by measuring contrast sensitivity. The mechanism by which TEA produces symptoms remains an issue of further study.     

A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus a refractive designed multifocal intraocular lens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively a diffractive (811E, Pharmacia; power add +4.0 D) versus a refractive (PA154N, Allergan; power add +3.5 D) designed multifocal lens. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients planned for cataract surgery without additional ocular pathologies were randomized into the diffractive or refractive group, respectively. INTERVENTION: A standardized no-stitch phacoemulsification with implantation of one of the two multifocal lenses was performed in each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distance and near-visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, low contrast visual acuity, glare visual acuity, and depth of focus were measured after surgery. RESULTS: All treated patients had best-corrected visual acuities of 20/30 or better. Near-uncorrected vision was significantly better (P < 0.0001) with the diffractive lens (mean, J1) than with the refractive lens (mean, J4). Low contrast visual acuity (61 +/- 12% versus 59 +/- 9%), glare visual acuity (39 +/- 19% versus 38 +/- 14%), and contrast sensitivity (1.48 +/- 0.08 versus 1.50 +/- 0.12) were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both lens designs showed satisfactory functional results with advantages for the diffractive lens design.     

Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery

AIMS: To determine the improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery. METHODS: Clinical vision (monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare), functional vision (face identity and expression recognition, reading speed, word acuity, and mobility orientation), and perceived visual disability (Activities of Daily Vision Scale) were measured in 25 subjects before and after uncomplicated cataract surgery (10 first eye surgery and 15 second eye surgery) and in 10 age matched controls. RESULTS: Significant improvements were found after surgery in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability. Greater improvements were found after first eye surgery than after second eye surgery. However, first eye surgery did not return all scores to age matched normal levels. There were significant improvements in several of the tests measured after second eye surgery, and all postoperative values were similar to those from age matched normals. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in clinical, functional, and perceived vision are obtained by cataract surgery. The improvements in objective measures of functional vision found in this study support previous findings of improvements in patients' perceived functional vision. In addition, these data provide support to the necessity of second eye surgery in some patients to improve certain aspects of visual function to age matched normal levels.     

Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a wide range of psychophysical and electrophysiological tests in the detection of early glaucomatous damage. METHODS: Forty-three normals and 43 patients with early glaucoma, some still without field defects, were tested with differential light threshold perimetry, short-wavelength automated perimetry, high-pass resolution perimetry, motion detection, flicker contrast sensitivity, flickering and isoluminantly matched letter tests, and pattern and flash electroretinography, including photopic, scotopic, oscillatory potentials, and 30 Hz flicker. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was applied to continuous variables derived from each of the tests. RESULTS: Most parameters reflected glaucomatous loss to some degree, even though only single variables were analyzed separately in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The pattern electroretinogram and some of the letter acuity tests had the best sensitivity and specificity, followed by short-wavelength automated perimetry and high-pass resolution-perimetry. Motion detection, flicker contrast, and flash electroretinogram parameters scored poorly. Six patients with normal results on the Humphrey field test had abnormal results on many of the other tests. CONCLUSIONS: Applying different psychophysical and electrophysiological tests may add to our ability to detect early glaucomatous damage.     

Small letter contrast sensitivity: an alternative measure of visual resolution for aviation candidates

Exceptional vision is needed to maintain high levels of aviation performance. Current standards for helicopter pilot training include superior visual acuity with minimal refractive error. Despite these demanding criteria, it is likely that visual ability varies among those who meet the standards for pilot training. A more complete knowledge of visual capabilities in these individuals will allow us to better correlate vision with performance and to develop more incisive criteria for selection. The purpose of this study was to investigate an alternative test of visual resolution for aviation candidates using small letter contrast sensitivity (SLCS). Computer-generated letter charts were used to measure visual acuity (VA) and SLCS in 16 candidates who had satisfied military vision standards for pilot training. The acuity and contrast charts varied, by line, in equal log steps such that the letter recognition task was comparable for the two types of measurement. VA and SLCS were highly correlated in these subjects, indicating that the two tests measure similar aspects of visual resolution. Scores were distributed across two lines on the acuity chart, but across four lines on the contrast chart, suggesting that SLCS offers a more discriminating test of resolution. This assumption was confirmed in that SLCS was more highly correlated with small amounts of refractive error in the candidates tested. SLCS offers a sensitive, adjunctive measure of visual resolution which may be useful for identifying the unique visual abilities required for aviation.     

Endocrine and behavioral effects of airpuff-startle in rats

Computerized tests of neurobehavioral function are frequently administered in neurotoxicological studies with little attention given to the optical properties of test stimuli or to the vision of subjects. Yet many test stimuli are small or briefly presented, and test endpoints often involve short reaction times. Stimulus detection and reaction time are known to be strongly dependent upon stimulus luminance, contrast, and size, as well as on the subject's visual abilities. The current study assessed the influence of visual contrast sensitivity on Neurobehavioral Evaluation System 2 (NES2) test results in three data sets. Analyses indicated that vision was associated with up to 24% of the variance (Hand Eye Coordination test) in NES2 scores, even when visual acuity was normal, and that vision often influenced the significance of group differences. It is suggested that researchers measure the luminance, contrast, and size of test stimuli, the distance from the subject's eyes to the monitor, and the subject's visual contrast sensitivity. The measurement and control of stimulus parameters and the inclusion of visual function scores in analysis models could reduce the variability among computerized test scores both within and between studies. Models that assess the influence of vision on computerized test results may help to identify the CNS domains and specialized functions adversely affected by neurotoxicant exposures.     

Motion parallax: effects of blur, contrast, and field size in normal and low vision

Can people with different forms of low vision use motion parallax to improve depth judgments? We used a staircase method to compare depth thresholds using motion parallax and static viewing. We tested eighteen normal-vision subjects with a range of simulated deficits in acuity, contrast sensitivity, and simulated peripheral-field loss, and ten low-vision subjects with a wide range of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and field loss. Subjects viewed three vertical cylinders monocularly and indicated which one was at a different depth from the other two. For motion-parallax trials, observers moved their heads (in a viewing assembly on rollers) from side to side over a range of 6-12 cm. For static trials, the viewing assembly was fixed in place. Normal-vision subjects' depth thresholds with motion parallax were significantly smaller than those with static viewing by an average factor of 1.95 (p < 0.05) across all levels of acuity and contrast. For low-vision observers, the depth thresholds exhibited large individual differences; however, the motion-parallax thresholds were smaller than the static thresholds by an average factor of 2.05 (p < 0.01). These findings indicate that motion parallax can provide useful depth information for people with low vision.     

Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity

Although previous investigations have reported that changes in background luminance, stimulus contrast, and dioptric blur can each affect visual acuity independently, it has not been shown how these three variables interact to influence visual acuity. This is a particularly important issue if one is interested in predicting how individuals with different refractive characteristics will be able to perform acuity-based tasks in degraded visual environments with low background lighting and contrast levels. To investigate these relations, we conducted a series of experiments in which measurements of visual acuity were obtained for four subjects using Landolt C targets of varying contrast at several background luminances for levels of blur between 0 and 8 diopters (D). Our results show that visual acuity is significantly affected by all three factors, and that their effects are essentially additive. At all luminance and contrast levels, the reduction in visual acuity is greatest for dioptric blur up to 2.0 D, with a more gradual reduction in visual acuity for dioptric blur of greater than 2.0 D. At all blur and luminance levels, visual acuity decreases gradually for contrast levels down to 20%, and decreases sharply for lower contrast levels. Over the range of background luminances we tested (75.0 to 0.075 cd/m2), visual acuity decreases linearly with reductions in luminance. The additive effects of dioptric blur, contrast, and luminance provide a basis for predicting visual acuity-related task performance for individuals in different visual environments. For example, an individual with 6/6 (20/20) visual acuity under high luminance-high contrast conditions will fall to 6/18 (20/60) acuity for low luminance conditions and 6/30 (20/100) for low luminance-low contrast conditions. Similarly, an individual with an uncorrected visual acuity of 6/30 (20/100) under optimal conditions will fall to approximately 6/120 (20/400) under low luminance conditions and 6/240 (20/800) under low luminance-low contrast conditions.     

Away from a unisex psychology: individual differences in visual sensory and perceptual processes

Four tests of visual perception were given to twenty-five men and twenty-five women. These were a test of acuity, threshold for four field positions, visual persistence, and a measure of comfortable brightness. Subjects also completed five personality questionnaires. In most measures, differences were found to be related to sex rather than to personality factors. In fact, the analyses performed suggest that persenality tests do not measure equivalent processes in men and women. Correlational anaylsis showed all visual functions to be independent of one another with the exception of photopic acuity and scotopic threshold, which were highly correlated. Two new findings on the visual system emerged which have not been reported elsewhere: (i) Four distinct dark adaptation curves were produced, and have been labeled as exponential, flat-exponential, linear, and plateau. All subjects fell into one of these categories and showed a consistent trend to exhibit these curves for all field positions. (ii) Highly significant differences were found in sensitivity for the four visual fields, the upper field was superior, followed by the right, then left, with the lower visual field considerably poorer.     

Spatial contrast sensitivity through aviator's night vision imaging system

Visual acuity is often used to assess vision through image intensifying devices such as night vision goggles (NVG's). Fewer attempts have been made to measure contrast sensitivity through NVG's. Such information would be useful to better understand contrast processing through NVG's under various stimulus conditions. In this study, computer-generated letter charts were used to measure contrast sensitivity through third generation NVG's for a range of letter sizes. The red phosphor of a standard color monitor proved to be an effective stimulus for third generation devices. Different night sky conditions were simulated over a 3 log unit range. The results illustrate the profile of contrast sensitivity through third generation NVG's over a range of night sky conditions. Comparison of measurements through NVG's to measurements obtained without the device but at the same luminance and color distinguish between effects of luminance and noise on contrast sensitivity.     

Changes in visual acuity in a population. The Beaver Dam Eye Study

PURPOSE: To describe the change in visual acuity over a 5-year period in persons participating in a large population-based study. METHODS: Best-corrected visual acuity was measured, after refraction, with logMAR charts using a modification of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol in 3684 persons living in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, who ranged in age from 43 to 86 years at the time of a baseline examination from 1988 to 1990, and at a follow-up examination from 1993 to 1995. RESULTS: The change in the number of letters read correctly over the 5-year period varied from 0.4 +/- 4.9 (mean +/- standard deviation) in people between 43 and 54 years of age to -5.2 +/- 15.4 in people 75 years of age or older at baseline. Over the 5-year period, vision became impaired (20/40 or worse in the better eye) in 2.9% of the population and severely impaired (20/200 or worse in the better eye) in 0.3%. The visual angle doubled in 1.7% of the population, and 2.4% had improved vision. People 75 years of age or older at baseline were 12.5 times (95% confidence interval [Cl], 8.6-18.2; P < 0.001) more likely to have impaired vision, 9.7 times (95% Cl, 5.9-16.0; P < 0.001) more likely to have doubling of the visual angle, and 78 times more likely (95% Cl, 9.9-614.1; P < 0.001) to have severe visual impairment than people younger than 75 years of age at baseline. People 75 years of age or older who were living in nursing homes or group homes were 3.8 times more likely to have impaired vision, 3.3 times more likely to have severely impaired vision, and 5.7 times more likely to have a doubling of the visual angle than those not residing in a nursing home or a group home. CONCLUSION: These data provide precise population-based estimates of incidence of visual loss over a wide spectrum of ages and show that decreased visual acuity in people 75 years of age is a common finding, especially in those who are in nursing homes or group homes.     

Evaluation of vestibular and visual oculomotor function

The visual system interacts synergistically with the vestibular system. A normally functioning vestibulo-ocular reflex is necessary but not sufficient for optimum visual acuity during head motion. Studies of dynamic visual acuity, the acuity achieved during relative motion of visual targets or of the observer, indicate that motion of images on the retina markedly compromises vision. The vestibulo-ocular reflex normally provides a substantial measure of stabilization of the retina during head movements, but purely vestibular compensatory eye movements are not sufficiently precise for optimal vision under all circumstances. Other mechanisms, including visual tracking, motor preprogramming, prediction, and mental set, interact synergistically to optimize the gain (eye velocity divided by head velocity) of compensatory head movements. All of these mechanisms are limited in their capacity to produce effective visual-vestibular interaction at higher rotational frequencies and velocities. It is under these conditions that vestibular deficits give rise to symptoms of oscillopsia. Patients having vestibular lesions exploit mechanisms of visual-vestibular interaction to compensate by substitution for deficient vestibular function. Thus, for accurate topographic clinical diagnosis of vestibular lesions, testing conditions should isolate purely vestibular responses. This may be done by testing reflex eye movements during passively generated rotations in darkness, or perhaps by testing during other types of motion under conditions of extreme frequency and velocity sufficient to attenuate the effects of visual-vestibular interaction. This article reviews clinical tests of vestibular function in relation to synergistic interactions with vision.     

Increased absolute light sensitivity in Himalayan mice with cold-induced ocular pigmentation

Controversy over the relationship between ocular pigmentation and absolute dark-adapted light sensitivity has persisted for over two decades. Previous electrophysiological experiments in hypopigmented mammals (mice, rats, rabbits) show increased thresholds in the dark-adapted state proportional to the deficit in ocular melanin. Animals with the least amount of ocular melanin have the most elevated thresholds. Dark-adapted thresholds in hypopigmented mice show similar threshold elevations in behavioral tests. The present study extends these findings to show that a specific increase in ocular pigmentation results in the converse effect, lowered absolute dark-adapted thresholds. The increase in ocular melanin was accomplished by keeping Himalayan mice in the cold (4 degrees C) for 6 weeks. Himalayan mice (C57BL/6J cH/cH) were compared to black mice (C57BL/6J (+/+)) and albino mice (C57BL/6J c2J/c2J) after 6 weeks at either 4 degrees C or 20 degrees C in 12-h cycling light (<1 cd/m2). The Himalayan mice that were kept in the cold exhibited a 44% increase in ocular melanin compared to Himalayan mice kept at room temperature. Cold rearing did not effect ocular melanin or visual thresholds in control animals (black mice = 10(-5.9) cd/m2 and albino mice = 10(-4.4) cd/m2). In contrast, the Himalayan mice maintained at 4 degrees C had thresholds of 10(-5.7) cd/m2 compared to 10(-5.1) cd/m2 for Himalayan mice kept at 20 degrees C. This represents compelling evidence of a direct relationship between ocular melanin concentration and absolute dark-adapted light sensitivity.