Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic digestive surgery is right now like a revolution. The author, after a short historic hommage to Raoul Palmer who in 1940 realized the first laparoscopy and also to Philippe Mouret and Fran?ois Dubois who performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the world in 1987, is doing some comments. The comments are based in the experience of the author who performed in his surgical department about 400 cholecystectomies and another study realized with B. Delaitre on 6512 cases showing a decrease of morbidity however a dramatic increase of biliary complications from 1/1000 to 1% this leads the author to two types of reflexions. One based on technical problem especially in high frequency surgery, the other in training of this new surgical technic and also on rapid extension, sometime anarchistic, of the indications of this new digestive laparoscopic surgery. In conclusion, we have to performed clinical research before doing next applications of laparoscopic surgery and keep in mind the necessity for a new technic to be better for patients.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Advances in surgical technology have enabled the concept of 'keyhole surgery' to become a reality. The author describes the technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the advantages it offers over conventional methods of surgically removing the gall bladder.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Traditional cholecystectomy has been the standard surgical treatment of the gallstone disease for more than 100 years. The technical development led to a new surgical procedure and its rapid acceptance. This is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Its application is becoming widespread in therapy too. But most of the surgeons are lack of technical experiences in this field. Currently it restricts the indications those are anyway the same of standard cholecystectomy. Besides its many advantages, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has its own disadvantages and being an invasive procedure, there are possibilities of complications. The latest can be reduced by the adequate choice of patients, the careful learning of the operative technic and by turning to open surgery (conversion) when it is necessary. Its morbidity is nearly equal to complications of standard cholecystectomy, but mortality rate is lower (0.05-0.2%). Our morbidity of performed 300 laparoscopic cholecystectomies was 6.4%. We had no death. The hospitalization became as short as 4 days. Our early clinical results (90%) are the same of traditional cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a new surgical procedure involves the efficiency of the standard cholecystectomy and the noninvasive endoscopic technic. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by well trained surgeons is a safe surgical procedure, its early results are excellent and makes the choice of surgical treatment, used in bile surgery richer.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classical cholecystectomy

The authors evaluated the results after classical (CCHE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCHE) in the period from March 16 1994 to June 30 1995. In this period they operated on 408 patients, out of which 208 were operated by the laparoscopic technique. There were no differences in postoperative morbidity. The mortality after laparoscopic surgery was 0% and the classical cholecystectomy reached the morbidity of 1.4%. Complicated patients were usually operated in the classical way. The time of hospitalisation after LCHE was 5.2 days and after CCHE 8.3 days. The results of LCHE were as follows: morbidity 10.5%, conversions 2.4%, reoperations 1.4%, and no leakage of the bile duct. We saved 40% of costs using LCHE. All these facts show that LCHE is advantageous, secure and well tolerated by patients. The patients prefer comfort after the operation, good cosmetic effect and a short hospital isation. CCHE did not lose its position, especially in complicated cases. (Tab. 5, Ref. 21.)     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under epidural anesthesia in patients with chronic respiratory disease

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become firmly established as a procedure of choice for gallstone disease. The procedure usually necessitates general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation to prevent aspiration and respiratory embarrassment secondary to the induction of pneumoperitoneum. There is a paucity of data in the literature on the procedure being performed under regional (epidural) anaesthesia, especially in patients with coexisting pulmonary disease and pregnancy, who are deemed high risk for general anaesthesia. We report our preliminary experience with LC using epidural anaesthesia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: We performed LC in six patients (one man and five women), with a median age of 56 years (range, 38-74), under epidural anaesthesia over an 8-month period. All patients were ASA grade III/IV and the mean FEB1/FVC was 0.52 (range, 0.4-0.68), due to chronic asthma (two cases) and COPD (four cases). They were admitted a day prior to surgery for pulmonary function tests, nebulisers, and chest physiotherapy. An epidural catheter was introduced at T10/11 intervertebral space, and a bolus of 0.5% Bupivacaine was administered. Depending on the patient's pain threshold and the segmental level of analgesia achieved, incremental doses of 2 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine along with boluses of intravenous 100 mcg Alfentanil was given to each patient. The patients were breathing spontaneously. No nasogastric tube was inserted, and a low-pressure (10 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum was created. LC was performed according to the standard technique. RESULTS: All the patients tolerated the procedure well and made an uneventful postoperative recovery. Median operating time was 50 min; average length of hospital stay was 2.5 days (range, 2-4). The epidural catheter was removed the morning after the operation. Only one patient required postoperative opioid analgesia. Two patients complained of persistent shoulder tip pain during surgery and required intraoperative analgesia (Alfentanil). There was no change in the patient's cardiorespiratory status, including PO2 and pCO2, and no complications occurred either intra- or postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: LC can be performed safely under epidural anaesthesia in patients with severe COPD. Intraoperative shoulder tip or abdominal pain does not seem to be a major deterrent and can be effectively controlled with small doses of opioid analgesia.     

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy

Subtotal cholecystectomy is a definitive and safe operation to treat diseases of the gallbladder, whenever there are major difficulties in dissection from the liver. Described herein is successful experience with 6 patients using this technique, through the laparoscopic approach. In cases with severe inflammatory changes, gallbladder embedded in liver tissue, and liver cirrhosis, they enabled reduction of operative time and avoidance of excessive bleeding that could have caused the conversion of the laparoscopic approach to open laparotomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy

Several recent literature reviews have shown that Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in pregnant females with symptomatic gallbladder disease. We have performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a cholecystectomy (6,080 patients) from January 1, 1990 until December 31, 1996 at San Pablo Medical Center. Lapa-cholecystecomy was performed in 4,252 (64%) and in the remaining 1,828 (36%) patients, an open cholecystectomy performed. Of the Laparoscopic cases, 5(0.1%) were performed in pregnant females with complicated gallbladder disease(GBD). The diagnosis of GBD was done with an abdominal sonogram. Four of the 5 patients had suffered from gallstones pancreatitis and one acute cholecystitis, prior to the operation. The records of patients were reviewed to secure the following variables, age, pre and post operative course and outcome. Intraoperative cholangiogram performed in 1 patient. No complications were seen in the mother or in the fetus in any of the five cases. Literature was reviewed to assess our reports. Conclusions: Pregnant females with complicated gallbladder disease can be safely managed with Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy

Acute calculus cholecystitis during pregnancy can be a difficult management problem. Two pregnant patients with cholecystitis refractory to conservative management underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a community hospital. One patient was treated under epidural anesthesia. Pregnancy should not be an absolute contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and epidural anesthesia should be considered.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder stones

The authors describe the technique for the treatment of gallbladder stones using a laparoscopic approach and discuss the diagnostic and operative flow chart stressing complications and ways to avoid them. A total of 2517 non-selected patients underwent surgery since october 1990 up to september 1995. 252 were affected by acute cholecystitis (10%); 172 underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ERCP was performed in 278 patients (11.04%): 177 underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 21 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy before sphincterotomy, 8 laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ESWL. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was converted into laparotomy in 37 patients (1.4%); surgery was abandoned in 3 patients following to onset of intense bradycardia. Major complications were observed in 0.63%; bile duct injury occurred in four patients (0.15%). One patient died following a massive intraoperative myocardial infarction. Average operative time was 21 minutes. Only 22.8% of patients required mild analgesia on the first day after surgery. The average hospital postoperative stay was 2.6 days. Return to work took place in 98% of non complicated patients within one week of being discharged from hospital.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was fulfilled in 108 patients admitted to the clinic with acute cholecystitis. Operations were made on 73% of them during the first four days from the beginning of the disease, 18.5% were operated upon within 5-7 days, 8.5% - 8 days later. Endoscopic papillotomy with removing the stones from the choledochus was performed in 10% of the patients before operation. Serious problems during taking the gallbladder from the inflammatory infiltration were observed in 29% of the patients. Technical problems took place more often if the patients were operated upon 5 days after the beginning of the disease. Change for open laparoscopy and standard cholecystectomy were necessary in 9 patients (8.3%). There were no lethal outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Complications were observed in 12 patients (11.1%). The average period of staying at the hospital was (5.2 +/- 2.1) days. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be successfully performed in patients with acute cholecystitis by a sufficiently experienced surgeon.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy are the safest procedures for all diseases related to stones in the gallbladder as they have a low morbidity and mortality rate. However, the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients has not been investigated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic versus non-cirrhotic patients was performed. Between January 1991 and November 1994, 605 laparoscopic cholecystectomies for symptomatic gallbladder diseases were performed. There were 21 patients in the cirrhotic (group A) and 584 patients in the non-cirrhotic (group B). RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group and the postoperative complication rates were 4.8% and 5.8% in group A and B, respectively (p > 0.05). Prolonged operative time in group A was 84.47 +/- 36.01 min vs group B 62.20 +/- 25.37 min (p < 0.01). The estimated intraoperative blood loss in group A was larger than in group B (140.76 +/- 201.19 ml vs 35.02 +/- 50.11 ml, p < 0.01). The readmission rate was higher in group A (9.5%) than in group B (1.37%) (p < 0.05). The hospital stay in group A and B were 4.12 +/- 2.15 D, 3.50 +/- 1.50 D respectively (p > 0.05). The incidence of conversion and re-operation rates indicated no difference between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in mild cirrhotic patients with more operative times and meticulous management of intraoperative bleeding.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The Netherlands

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the Netherlands in the Spring of 1990. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the procedure in Dutch hospitals over the first 2 years to obtain some insight into its safety and efficacy in general surgical practice. A written questionnaire was sent to all 138 Dutch surgical institutions enquiring about conversion rate, complications (with emphasis on mortality rate and common bile duct injuries), operating time and hospital stay. The surgeons' opinions were also sought on possible contraindications such as previous operation, bile duct stones and cholecystitis, as were their estimations of the percentage of patients in their practice eligible for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Data were obtained for 6076 laparoscopic cholecystectomies; the response rate was 100 per cent. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in 413 patients (6.8 per cent), mostly because of adhesions, cholecystitis, haemorrhage and unclear anatomy. Postoperative complications were reported in 260 patients (4.3 per cent). There were seven deaths (0.12 per cent) and 52 (0.86 per cent) bile duct injuries, of which 20 were recognized during laparoscopy. The mean operating time for the ten most recent patients in each institute was 70 (range 30-180) min and the mean hospital stay 4.5 (range 2-8) days. Previous lower abdominal operations were not considered to be a contraindication by 96 per cent of surgeons, whereas previous upper abdominal procedures were regarded as a contraindication by 66 per cent. After successful clearance of the bile duct at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, only 12 per cent would perform an open procedure. Moderate cholecystitis was not considered a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy by 71 per cent of surgeons, but severe cholecystitis was a reason for open cholecystectomy for 83 per cent. In most surgical practices 70-80 per cent of patients were considered to be eligible for the laparoscopic procedure. In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained rapid acceptance in the Netherlands. Although the number of bile duct injuries is high, the findings of this general survey are similar to those from highly specialized centres and match the overall results of conventional cholecystectomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pancreas transplant recipients

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Since its introduction in 1987, this procedure has been employed with increasing frequency as its safety has been documented in numerous studies. Absolute contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy have become relative contraindications, and patients previously felt to be at excessive risk for laparoscopic cholecystectomy are viewed as patients who may benefit from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of this procedure in patients with comorbid medical conditions has the potential to decrease patient morbidity. Patients who have previously undergone solid organ transplantation and require immunosuppressive therapy are a group of patients who may benefit from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We report four patients who have previously undergone combined renal and pancreas transplantation who underwent successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the geriatric population

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and conversion rates of inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in older people living in the community. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: All acute care hospitals providing cholecystectomy in a single state. Medicare patients who underwent inpatient cholecystectomy in fiscal year 1994 in Arkansas. METHODS: A random sample comprising 449 of 2182 geriatric patients who underwent inpatient cholecystectomy in fiscal year 1994, stratified by hospital bed size, had charts reviewed for type of cholecystectomy performed, occurrence of conversion from a laparoscopic to an open cholecystectomy, surgical complications, and need for transfusion. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of nonincidental cholecystectomies were initially laparoscopic. Total conversion rate for all inpatient laparoscopic cases was 20%. Forty-two percent of this group suffered acute cholecystitis with male patients exhibiting a higher rate of acute cholecystitis than female patients. Conversion rates for elective cholecystectomy for both sexes was between 13 and 14%. Conversion rate to an open procedures was 28% for patients with acute disease, with male patients again having a higher rate than female patients (40% vs 19%, P < .001). Surgical complications and intraoperative transfusions were rare. Conversion rates did not vary between large and small hospitals or among different age groups within the older population. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is common in older people both for acute and chronic gallbladder conditions. Conversion rates ranged from 13% for elective cholecystectomy to 28% for acute disease. These rates are higher than published literature, which focuses on younger populations undergoing elective procedures. Audit committees need to be aware of this higher conversion rate in older people when assessing surgical proficiency.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the densely scarred abdomen

Extensive intra-abdominal adhesions are a possible contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and are known to occur after peritonitis because of perforated hollow viscus or multiple abdominal operations. Four such patients, who had undergone three or more previous abdominal operations, and had additional complicating factors, were successfully treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An initial subxiphoid incision with blunt finger dissection was used to place the primary port. This approach achieves greater success and is safer than the traditional open umbilical dissection, because it avoids extensive lysis of small bowel and transverse colon adhesions from the anterior abdominal wall.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using ultrasonically activated coagulating shears

A 4-year-old girl with bilateral striatal oedema in association with an echovirus type 21 infection is reported. In the course of a prolonged upper respiratory-tract infection, the patient developed muscular hypotonia, resting tremor, ataxia, sleepiness, hyperaesthesia, and indistinct speech. T2-weighted cranial MRI revealed bilateral oedema of the basal ganglia and the cerebellar peduncles. At follow-up after 3 months MRI changes and clinical symptoms had fully resolved.