Combatting sexual harassment.

Comments that S. Riger's (see record 1991-27670-001) overemphasis on presumed gender-biased definitions and on changing legislation and organizational policy related to sexual harassment (SH) detracts from her aim of promoting the growth and development of women in a changing society. Interventions are needed for modifying the social atmosphere that encourages SH and the educational procedures designed to help women recognize and combat SH. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The sexual harassment of uppity women.

In 3 studies, the author tested 2 competing views of sexual harassment: (a) It is motivated primarily by sexual desire and, therefore, is directed at women who meet feminine ideals, and (b) it is motivated primarily by a desire to punish gender-role deviants and, therefore, is directed at women who violate feminine ideals. Study 1 included male and female college students (N = 175) and showed that women with relatively masculine personalities (e.g., assertive, dominant, and independent) experienced the most sexual harassment. Study 2 (N = 134) showed that this effect was not because women with relatively masculine personalities were more likely than others to negatively evaluate potentially harassing scenarios. Study 3 included male and female employees at 5 organizations (N = 238) and showed that women in male-dominated organizations were harassed more than women in female-dominated organizations, and that women in male-dominated organizations who had relatively masculine personalities were sexually harassed the most. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Guidelines for the elimination of sexual harassment.

Presents a summary of the guidelines for the elimination of sexual harassment adopted by the Canadian Psychological Association. The guidelines include a definition of sexual harassment, and they outline the responsibilities of professional psychologists not only to refrain from practicing harassment but also to take responsible action when they know of sexual harassment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The sexual harassment of men: Evidence for a broader theory of sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

The article imposes a social science framework on a law-based theory of sexual harassment forwarded by Katherine Franke (1997), which sought to address shortcomings of extant theory and to account for atypical forms of sexual harassment, notably male same-sex sexual harassment (SSSH). Sex-role spillover theory, sexual harassment climate theory, and Person × Situation theory are discussed with regard to their ability to account for SSSH. Preliminary postulates of this framework are tested with data from the 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey of the U.S. military (J. E. Edwards, T. W. Elig, D. L. Edwards, & R. A. Riemer (1997). The results suggest that SSSH occurs because targeted men do not fit their offenders' gender-role stereotype of heterosexual hypermasculinity. Legal and workplace implications are discussed in an effort to expand existing theories and policies regarding sexual harassment to this more encompassing view. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Arbitration, mediation, and sexual harassment.

The 1998 Supreme Court decisions in Faragher v. City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth recognized an affirmative defense to hostile environment sexual harassment claims based in part on the existence of an effective policy prohibiting sexual harassment in the workplace. The promulgation or refinement of policies prohibiting sexual harassment will likely lead to an increase in complaints of sexual harassment. This article concludes that mediation and arbitration procedures which follow recognized standards of due process are appropriate means to resolve these claims and may substantially contribute to the Title VII goal of eradicating discrimination from the workplace. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Exploring gender-based differences to combat sexual harassment.

Comments on S. Riger's (see record 1991-27670-001) article on gender dilemmas in sexual harassment (SH) policies and procedures. It is lamented that Riger did not frame her discussion within the larger context of managing demographic diversity in the workplace and that she did not extend her analysis of gender-based differences to propose specific organizational strategies for combatting SH. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Patients' sexual behavior and sexual harassment: A survey of clinical supervisors.

How do clinical supervisors respond to supervisees' reports of sexualized or sexually harassing behaviors by patients? A survey of experienced supervisors was conducted to answer this question and to determine the incidence of such reports. A substantial number of participants reported receiving at least 1 report of patient sexual harassment of a supervisee. Reports ranged from persistent inappropriate sexual comments to physical sexual assaults. Supervisors' responses ranged from supervisory discussions to active interventions. Clinical supervisors must acknowledge the potential for supervisees to be sexually harassed by patients and incorporate strategies to deal with harassment in their training programs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Coping with sexual harassment: Reconceptualizing women's resistance.

This study explored the underlying structure of women's coping with sexual harassment from a rational-empirical approach. On the basis of multidimensional scaling, clustering, and confirmatory factor analysis across 8 data sets, 4 clusters of coping behaviors emerged, with little variance across the data sets. These clusters bear resemblance to Moos and colleagues' (C. J. Holahan, R. H. Moos, & J. A. Schaefer, 1996; R. Moos, 1992; R. H. Moos & J. A. Schaefer, 1993) distinction between coping strategies that differ in both method and foci. The four clusters that emerged are behavioral engagement, behavioral disengagement, cognitive engagement, and cognitive disengagement. This framework provides insight into the complex forms that women's coping with sexual harassment takes and has important legal implications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sexual harassment and sexual intimacy in learning environments.

This paper, prepared under the auspices of the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) Education and Training Committee, reviews the literature on sexual harassment and sexual intimacy between students and faculty or supervisors in educational contexts with a particular focus on the Canadian scene. Topics discussed include definitional issues, incidence and examples, consequences, ethical issues, and strategies for change. Past responses of CPA to these concerns are outlined. Also included is the set of recommendations recently approved by the CPA Board of Directors, designed to assist educational institutions in addressing the problems of sexual harassment and inappropriate sexual intimacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Social adjustment in victims of sexual assault.

93 rape victims (aged 15–71 yrs) were seen approximately 2 wks after the assault and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 mo postrape. A matched control group of nonvictims was seen at the same intervals. To control for the effects of repeated testing, 3 additional groups with 72 victims were assessed only once at either 2, 4, or 8 mo postrape. All Ss completed the Social Adjustment Scale–Self Report, which yielded a total adjustment score as well as subscale scores for 5 areas of adjustment: Work; Economic; Social and Leisure; Marital, Parental, and Family Unit; and Extended Family. Ss exhibited disruption in overall social adjustment and most of the subscale roles for the first few months following their assaults. By 4 mo postrape, most of the subscales had stabilized at levels similar to the nonvictims'. Work adjustment continued to be affected through 8 mo postrape. Single-testing control victims appeared to have more problems in social adjustment, particularly with regard to relationships with relatives. (14 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Patient sexual behavior and sexual harassment: A national survey of female psychologists.

A nationwide survey of 750 female psychologists practicing psychotherapy was conducted to determine the incidence of sexual harassment and potentially sexualized patient behaviors in clinical practice. A usable return rate of 48.7% was obtained (N?=?354). A total of 53.7% of the respondents reported at least 1 incident of sexual harassment. Events ranged from inappropriate verbal remarks to sexual assaults. Respondents reported an even higher incidence of sexually suggestive patient behaviors in clinical practice, although most of these were not experienced as sexual harassment. Implications for training and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Cognitive processing therapy for sexual assault victims.

Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) was developed to treat the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in rape victims. CPT is based on an information processing theory of PTSD and includes education, exposure, and cognitive components. 19 sexual assault survivors received CPT, which consists of 12 weekly sessions in a group format. They were assessed at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3- and 6-mo follow-up. CPT Ss were compared with a 20-S comparison sample, drawn from the same pool who waited for group therapy for at least 12 wks. CPT Ss improved significantly from pre- to posttreatment on both PTSD and depression measures and maintained their improvement for 6 mo. The comparison sample did not change from the pre- to the posttreatment assessment sessions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Junk logic: The abuse defense in sexual harassment litigation.

Recently, some defense-oriented authorities have proposed that a history of childhood sexual abuse can be used to attack virtually every aspect of a sexual harassment claimant's case, including the issues of unwelcomeness, reasonableness, damages, and even credibility. The authors critiqued these claims, arguing that they are not only grounded in faulty logic and fallacious reasoning but furthermore ignore or distort the large body of data that contradict them. Using evidence from 2 empirical studies, they argued that there is no scientific evidence for the claims of the "abuse defense" and provided a discussion of the dangers it poses to the integrity of the scientific contribution to judicial decision making. They concluded by briefly describing an alternative to the traditional method of damages determination that circumvents some of its most regressive aspects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.

Research on gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment informs an ongoing legal debate regarding the use of a reasonable person standard instead of a reasonable woman standard to evaluate sexual harassment claims. The authors report a meta-analysis of 62 studies of gender differences in harassment perceptions. An earlier quantitative review combined all types of social–sexual behaviors for a single meta-analysis; the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the magnitude of the female–male difference varies by type of behavior. An overall standardized mean difference of 0.30 was found, suggesting that women perceive a broader range of social–sexual behaviors as harassing. However, the meta-analysis also found that the female–male difference was larger for behaviors that involve hostile work environment harassment, derogatory attitudes toward women, dating pressure, or physical sexual contact than sexual propositions or sexual coercion. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Test of the cross-cultural generalizability of a model of sexual harassment.

Sexual harassment research has been primarily limited to examination of the phenomena in U.S. organizations; attempts to explore the generalizability of constructs and theoretical models across cultures are rare. This study examined (a) the measurement equivalence of survey scales in U.S. and Turkish samples using mean and covariance structure analysis and (b) the generalizability of the L. F. Fitzgerald, F. Drasgow, C. L. Hulin, M. J. Gelfand, and V. I Magley (1997) model of sexual harassment to the Turkish context using structural equations modeling. Analyses used questionnaire data from 336 Turkish women and 455 women from the United States. The results indicate that, in general, the survey scales demonstrate measurement equivalence and the pattern of relationships in the Fitzgerald et al. model generalizes to the Turkish culture. These results support the usefulness of the model for explaining sexual harassment experiences in a variety of organizational and cultural contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The fit and implementation of sexual harassment law to workplace evaluations.

Three studies used videotaped harassment complaints to examine the impact of legal standards on the evaluation of social-sexual conduct at work. Study 1 demonstrated that without legal instructions, college students' judgment strategies were highly variable. Study 2 compared 2 current legal standards, the "severity or pervasiveness test" and a proposed utilitarian alternative (i.e., the rational woman approach). Undergraduate participants taking the perspective of the complainant were more sensitive to offensive conduct than were those adopting an objective perspective. Although the utilitarian alternative further increased sensitivity on some measures, it failed to produce a principled judgment strategy. Finally, Study 3 examined the kinds of errors that full-time workers make when applying the "severity or pervasiveness" test to examine more closely the sensitivity of the subjective approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)