The functional anatomy of sound intensity discrimination

The human neuroanatomical substrate of sound intensity discrimination was investigated by combining psychoacoustics and functional neuroimaging. Seven normal subjects were trained to detect deviant sounds presented with a slightly higher intensity than a standard harmonic sound, using a Go/No Go paradigm. Individual psychometric curves were carefully assessed using a three-step psychoacoustic procedure. Subjects were scanned while passively listening to the standard sound and while discriminating changes in sound intensity at four different performance levels (d' = 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5). Analysis of regional cerebral blood flow data outlined activation, during the discrimination conditions, of a right hemispheric frontoparietal network already reported in other studies of selective or sustained attention to sensory input, and in which activity appeared inversely proportional to intensity discriminability. Conversely, a right posterior temporal region included in secondary auditory cortex was activated during discrimination of sound intensity independently of performance level. These findings suggest that discrimination of sound intensity involves two different cortical networks: a supramodal right frontoparietal network responsible for allocation of sensory attentional resources, and a region of secondary auditory cortex specifically involved in sensory computation of sound intensity differences.     

Auditory attention in hyperactive children: Effects of stimulant medication on dichotic listening performance.

Administered dichotic digit tasks requiring free report and selective listening, respectively, to 20 6–16 yr old hyperactive children. Ss received methylphenidate before 2 experimental sessions and a placebo before 2 control sessions. The stimulant did not improve free-report performance significantly; rather it facilitated or impaired performance, depending on how it affected the order in which stimuli were reported. Similarly, medication had no effect on overall selective-listening performance, but it increased the difficulty of switching attention from one ear to the other. Results demonstrate that stimulants may act to maintain selective attention and to inhibit channel switching. Listening asymmetry, that is, right-ear superiority, was influenced by task variables but not by stimulant medication. (25 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An examination of the roles played by meaning of feedback and attention to feedback in the "Valins effect."

Assessed meaning and attention in mediating the cognitive effects of false autonomic feedback, first reported by S. Valins (1966). In the context of a study of the physiological correlates of selective attention, 43 undergraduates were instructed either to attend to or ignore pulsed sounds that were described either as veridical heart rate feedback or as electronic "bleeps." These auditory stimuli were presented in parallel with slides illustrating skin diseases. Consistent with previous findings, slides associated with acceleration of the pulsed sounds were subsequently rated as significantly more unpleasant than those associated with no change in the speed of these sounds. However, this effect was not contingent on the apparent meaning of these sounds (heart rate vs bleeps) but was contingent on the degree of attention paid to the sounds. The "Valins effect" was obtained only when Ss attended to the sounds. (10 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Bisensory response to temporal frequency in 4-month-old infants.

Three studies investigated detection of auditory–visual equivalence of rate among 55 4-mo-olds. In the 1st 2 studies, Ss were shown pairs of check patterns flashing at 2, 4, and 8 Hz either in silence or while listening to a tone corresponding in rate to 1 member of the pair. In Study 1, rate of stimulation varied, whereas duty cycle (i.e., intensity) was kept constant. No evidence of bisensory matching of rate was found. In Study 2, rate and duty cycle covaried. Although no matching was found, the presence of the 2 most intense sounds led to a shift in looking toward lower rates of visual stimulation. In Study 3, rate was kept constant (2 Hz), whereas duty cycle was varied. No matching was found, but as in Study 2, the presence of the most intense sound led to a shift in looking toward the less intense visual stimuli. Although these findings are contrary to previous reports of auditory–visual matching of rate, they do indicate that sound influences visual preferences via an intensity-based response mechanism. (21 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination.

A mixture extension of signal detection theory is applied to source discrimination. The basic idea of the approach is that only a portion of the sources (say A or B) of items to be discriminated is encoded or attended to during the study period. As a result, in addition to 2 underlying probability distributions associated with the 2 sources, there is a 3rd distribution that represents items for which sources were not attended to. Thus, over trials, the observed response results from a mixture of an attended (A or B) distribution and a nonattended distribution. The situation differs in an interesting way from detection in that, for detection, there is mixing only on signal trials and not on noise trials, whereas for discrimination, there is mixing on both A and B trials. Predictions of the mixture model are examined for data from several recent studies and in a new experiment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Echo suppression and discrimination suppression aspects of the precedence effect

The precedence effect is a phenomenon that may occur when a sound from one direction (the lead) is followed within a few milliseconds by the same or a similar sound from another direction (the lag, or the echo). Typically, the lag sound is not heard as a separate event, and changes in the lag sound's direction cannot be discriminated. The hypothesis is proposed in this study that these two aspects of precedence (echo suppression and discrimination suppression) are at least partially independent phenomena. Two experiments were conducted in which pairs of noise bursts were presented to subjects from two loudspeakers in the horizontal plane to simulate a lead sound and a lag sound (the echo). Echo suppression threshold was measured as the minimum echo delay at which subjects reported hearing two sounds rather than one sound; discrimination suppression threshold was measured as the minimum echo delay at which subjects could reliably discriminate between two positions of the echo. In Experiment 1, it was found that echo suppression threshold was the same as discrimination suppression threshold when measured with a single burst pair (average 5.4 msec). However, when measured after presentation of a train of burst pairs (a condition that may produce "buildup of suppression"), discrimination suppression threshold increased to 10.4 msec, while echo suppression threshold increased to 26.4 msec. The greater buildup of echo suppression than of discrimination suppression indicates that the two phenomena are distinct under buildup conditions and may be the reflection of different underlying mechanisms. Experiment 2 investigated the effect of the directional properties of the lead and lag sounds on discrimination suppression and echo suppression. There was no consistent effect of the spatial separation between lead and lag sources on discrimination suppression or echo suppression, nor was there any consistent difference between the two types of thresholds (overall average threshold was 5.9 msec). The negative result in Experiment 2 may have been due to the measurements being obtained only for single-stimulus conditions and not for buildup conditions that may involve more central processing by the auditory system.     

Intensity discrimination for precedence effect stimuli

When two identical stimuli are presented from two loudspeakers with a brief delay between them, a single image is heard near the source of the leading sound. The delayed sound or echo appears to be suppressed whereas the preceding sound determines perceived location, hence the name, the precedence effect. This study investigated normal-hearing listeners' sensitivity to changes in the intensity of the lagging sound. Pairs of 2-ms white noise bursts, with a 2-ms delay between the onsets of lead and lag, were presented from two loudspeakers 45 degrees left and right of midline in an anechoic chamber. A 2AFC procedure was used to test discrimination of intensity changes in the lead, lag, and both sounds together. The untreated results showed discrimination to be poorest for changes in the lag stimulus. However, when the intensity differences were transformed into predictions of equivalent monaural level based on KEMAR measurements and binaural loudness summation, discrimination for the lag was equal to the other two conditions. A follow-up experiment found that listeners were highly sensitive to the presence of the lag, more sensitive than would be predicted from loudness changes. It is concluded that the precedence effect does not consist of a general suppression or attenuation of the lagging sound, but rather that suppression may be limited to directionality cues.     

Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials

Auditory event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during auditory and visual selective attention tasks. Auditory stimuli consisted of frequent standard tones (1000 Hz) and infrequent deviant tones (1050 Hz and 1300 Hz) delivered randomly to the left and right ears. Visual stimuli were vertical line gratings randomly presented on a video monitor at mean intervals of 6 s. During auditory attention, the subject attended to the stimuli in a designated ear and responded to the 1300-Hz deviants occurring among the attended tones. During visual attention, the subject responded to the occasional visual stimuli. ERPs for tones delivered to the attended ear were negatively displaced relative to ERPs elicited by tones delivered to the unattended ear and to ERPs elicited by auditory stimuli during visual attention. This attention effect consisted of negative difference waves with early and late components. Mismatch negativities (MMNs) were elicited by 1300-Hz and 1050-Hz deviants irrespective of whether they occurred among attended or unattended tones. MMN amplitudes were unaffected by attention, supporting the proposal that the MMN is generated by an automatic cerebral discrimination process.     

When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?

What happens after visual attention is allocated to an object? Although many theories of attention assume that all of its features are selected and processed, there has been little direct evidence that an irrelevant feature dimension of an attended nontarget is processed. In 5 experiments presented here, the authors used a singleton paradigm to investigate the effect of attention on nontarget objects. Participants made a speeded feature discrimination of a target for which the response was either compatible or incompatible with an irrelevant feature dimension of a distractor. The results show that the irrelevant distractor features were processed to the point that they interfered with the response to the target. The response compatibility effect was observed even when the location of the target or the distractor was invariant, although it was much weaker when both locations were invariant. These results demonstrate that in many circumstances, an attended distractor is completely selected and fully processed, and the complete processing of distractors depends on a number of factors, many of which are related to the strength of attention to the distractor. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The spatial constraint in intersensory pairing: No role in temporal ventriloquism.

A sound presented in temporal proximity to a light can alter the perceived temporal occurrence of that light (temporal ventriloquism). The authors explored whether spatial discordance between the sound and light affects this phenomenon. Participants made temporal order judgments about which of 2 lights appeared first, while they heard sounds before the 1st and after the 2nd light. Sensitivity was higher (i.e., a lower just noticeable difference) when the sound-light interval was ～100 ms rather than ～0 ms. This temporal ventriloquist effect was unaffected by whether sounds came from the same or a different position as the lights, whether the sounds were static or moved, or whether they came from the same or opposite sides of fixation. Yet, discordant sounds interfered with speeded visual discrimination. These results challenge the view that intersensory interactions in general require spatial correspondence between the stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

The detection of anisochrony in monaural and interaural sound sequences

Nakao and Axelrod (1976) and van Noorden (1975) showed that the threshold for discriminating an anisochronous duple rhythm (a series of clicks with a temporal offset on every other one) from an isochronous rhythm (no offset) is poorer when the clicks are presented alternately to the two ears than when they are presented to the same ears. Van Noorden reported that the difference between the thresholds in the alternating and nonalternating conditions varied with the tempo of the sequence. Nakao and Axelrod found invariance of this threshold difference with sequence speed. According to our quantification of temporal processing of interaural sequences, the latter result should be expected. We carried out five psychophysical experiments to establish interaural and monaural discrimination between isochronous and anisochronous rhythms. Across experiments, base time intervals of 60-720 msec were spanned. The main result was that we replicated the poorer discrimination for interaural sequences. This deterioration in discrimination was the same for all sequence speeds. It was also the case that the thresholds were almost constant up to a sound repetition rate of about 3 per second, but increased linearly with slower rates. This result supports evidence in the literature that temporal processing of sequences faster than about 3-4 sounds per second differs from temporal processing of slower sequences.     

The analysis of stimulus probability inside and outside the focus of attention, as reflected by the auditory N? and P? components.

Studied how N? and P? reflect a continuous process of matching inputs to a memory-based probabilistic model of the environment. 12 Ss performed a selective 2-channel auditory frequency discrimination while their evoked responses were registered in the attended and rejected channels. The auditory N? component was suppressed for all stimuli in the rejected channel at all probability levels, suppression being greatest when target stimuli were most probable. The rejected channel responded to reduced stimulus probability with N? augmentation. P? amplitude increased linearly as targets were made rarer, but only in the attended channel. When targets were most frequent, P? amplitude in the attended channel dropped to the same level as P? in the rejected channel. Selective attention is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for a selective P? response. Results indicate that attended inputs are modified selectively on the basis of location and pitch prior to the generation of N?, and information about stimulus probability is processed both inside and outside the focus of attention. Results with respect to P? point to a different probability-sensitive mechanism whose operation is contingent on focal attention. (French abstract) (19 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss

Auditory perception with hearing protectors was assessed in three groups of subjects, two with normal hearing, but differing in age, and one with moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Individuals were tested with the ears unoccluded, and fitted with each of two level-dependent ear muffs and their conventional level-independent counterparts. One of the former devices provided limited amplification. In each of these five ear conditions, the threshold of audibility for one-third octave noise bands centered at 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 Hz, consonant discrimination, and word recognition were measured in quiet and in a continuous impulse noise background. The results showed that the attenuation of sounds (i.e. the difference between protected and unoccluded thresholds) in quiet did not vary as a function of age or hearing loss for any of the four protectors. In noise, the difference between protected and unoccluded listening was close to zero, as long as hearing was normal. With hearing loss as a factor, there was a significant increment in the protected threshold, the amount determined by the device. Word recognition in quiet was adversely affected in normal-hearing listeners by the three attenuating devices but improved in noise relative to unoccluded listening. Amplification had a deleterious effect for both consonant discrimination and word recognition in noise. In hearing-impaired listeners, speech perception was impeded by all four muffs but less so in quiet with limited amplification.     

Asymmetries of selective listening and attention switching in children.

Administered a selective listening task to 155 normal right-handed 3–12 yr old children. The stimuli consisted of dichotic digits, ranging from single pairs to strings of 4 pairs/trial. Each S attempted to focus attention on 1 ear for 8 practice trials and 28 test trials before switching attention to the opposite ear. Separate analyses of correct responses and intrusion errors yielded almost identical results: There was a significant right-ear advantage (REA) and a developmental increase in overall performance, but there was no developmental change in degree of asymmetry. The REA increased with increasing list length, but independent analyses for each list length failed to reveal any developmental changes in REA. Listening asymmetry was influenced markedly by the order in which the ears were monitored; Ss of all ages had difficulty in switching attention from right ear to left. Results support the developmental invariance hypothesis of cerebral lateralization and demonstrate that auditory asymmetry is not merely a direct reflection of some fixed structural asymmetry in the brain. (54 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Evaluating warning sound urgency with reaction times.

It is well-established that subjective judgments of perceived urgency of alarm sounds can be affected by acoustic parameters. In this study, the authors investigated an objective measurement, the reaction time (RT), to test the effectiveness of temporal parameters of sounds in the context of warning sounds. Three experiments were performed using a RT paradigm, with two different concurrent visuomotor tracking tasks simulating driving conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 show that RT decreases as interonset interval (IOI) decreases, where IOI is defined as the time elapsed from the onset of one sound pulse to the onset of the next. Experiment 3 shows that temporal irregularity between pulses can capture a listener's attention. These findings lead to concrete recommendations: IOI can be used to modulate warning sound urgency; and temporal irregularity can provoke an arousal effect in listeners. The authors also argue that the RT paradigm provides a useful tool for clarifying some of the factors involved in alarm processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Attention During Adaptation Weakens Negative Afterimages.

The effect of attention during adaptation on subsequent negative afterimages was examined. One of 2 overlapped outline figures was attended during a 7-10-s adaptation period. When the figures were readily perceptually segregated (on the basis of color or motion), the subsequent afterimages were initially weaker for the previously attended figure. This effect was confirmed by demonstrations that the onset of a single afterimage was delayed when an afterimage inducer was attended during adaptation compared with when a central digit stream or an overlapped (brightness-balanced) figure that did not generate an afterimage was attended. The attention effect was further confirmed using a criterion-independent (dot-integration) paradigm. The fact that selective attention during adaptation weakened or delayed afterimages suggests that attention primarily facilitates the adaptation of polarity-independent processes that modulate the visibility of afterimages rather than facilitating the adaptation of polarity-selective processes that mediate the formation of afterimages. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information.

Studied the neglected aspect of social cognition: the way people select information for further processing from the vast amount available in social environments. A dichotic listening task was used in which 141 undergraduate Ss attended to or ignored self-relevant stimuli. It was found that self-relevant information required fewer attentional resources when presented to the attended channel, but more when presented to the rejected channel, relative to neutral words. This differential capacity allocation occurred despite Ss' lack of awareness of the contents of the rejected channel. Results support the existence and interaction of the 2 processes of attention in social information processing: a control process that regulates the contents of conscious awareness and an automatic process that attracts attention to stimuli without conscious intent. (70 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Human salmonellosis in Singapore

1. Cats with one cochlea destroyed were trained to localize sound. After behavioral measures of the animal's accuracy of localization were made, cortical auditory areas were ablated unilaterally. 2. The results showed: a) like binaural localization, monaural localization of sound in space, as measured by the ability of an animal to move toward a sound source, depends on integrity of auditory cortex; b) it is only ablation of cortex contralateral to the functional ear that seriously affects localizing behavior; ablation of cortex ipsilateral to the intact cochlea has little or no effect on localizing behavior. 3. To explain the results, we suggest that auditory cortex is essential for an organized perception of space including the relation of the animal's position to other objects in space. We also suggest that auditory cortex contralateral to a given ear is necessary in order for the animal to recognize that a stimulus is presented to that ear of, when both ears are intact, to recognize that the stimulus to the given ear differs in some way (intensity, time of arrival, sequential arrangement of sounds) from the stimulus to the opposite ear.     

Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds

Sound-processing strategies that use the highly non-random structure of natural sounds may confer evolutionary advantage to many species. Auditory processing of natural sounds has been studied almost exclusively in the context of species-specific vocalizations, although these form only a small part of the acoustic biotope. To study the relationships between properties of natural soundscapes and neuronal processing mechanisms in the auditory system, we analysed sound from a range of different environments. Here we show that for many non-animal sounds and background mixtures of animal sounds, energy in different frequency bands is coherently modulated. Co-modulation of different frequency bands in background noise facilitates the detection of tones in noise by humans, a phenomenon known as co-modulation masking release (CMR). We show that co-modulation also improves the ability of auditory-cortex neurons to detect tones in noise, and we propose that this property of auditory neurons may underlie behavioural CMR. This correspondence may represent an adaptation of the auditory system for the use of an attribute of natural sounds to facilitate real-world processing tasks.     

Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: Attention alone does not explain why the discs are bouncing.

Two discs moving from opposite points in space, overlapping and stopping at the other disc's starting point, can be seen as either bouncing or streaming through each other. With silent displays, observers report the discs as streaming, whereas if a sound is played when the discs touch each other, observers report the discs as bouncing. The origin of the switch from streaming to bouncing response is not known yet. The sound either shifts perception toward that of an impact-elastic event (i.e., a bounce) or subtracts the attention that is necessary to perceive the discs as streaming. We used either impact-similar (abrupt amplitude attack, gradual decay) or impact-dissimilar sounds (gradual amplitude attack, abrupt decay) and found that the first sounds induce the bouncing response, whereas the latter, although as distracting as the first, render streaming and bouncing responses equally frequent at most. We interpret the audiovisual bouncing effect as resulting from attention subtraction, which raises the number of bounce responses in comparison with silent displays, and from perception, which further increments the number of bounce responses and turns the response into a strong bounce response. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)