Peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Culture of peritoneal dialysate fluid

Conventional aerobic and anaerobic culture of peritoneal dialysate effluent from patients in continuous peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was compared to culture in a semiautomated blood culture system. During a two-year period 78 of 79 consecutive episodes of peritonitis among 45 Danish CAPD patients were cultured and the etiology of the infection found in 73 (94%). The sensitivity of the blood culture system was 88%, whereas the sensitivity of the conventional culture of the dialysate effluent was 81%. This difference is not significant (McNemar test; 0.5 > p > 0.3). The majority of isolates were Gram-positive bacteria dominated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (38%). In comparison, only 2% of the cultures of peritoneal dialysate effluent taken within the same period from patients without clinical signs of peritonitis were positive. All the Gram-positive aerobic bacteria were sensitive to vancomycin whereas 97% of the Gram-negative aerobic bacteria were sensitive to gentamicin. An initial empiric treatment of peritonitis with a combination of vancomycin and gentamicin is recommended.     

Desiderata for product labeling of medical expert systems

The ability of seventy clinical laboratories in nine European countries to detect glycopeptide resistance in Gram-positive bacteria was investigated. Results of routine tests were compared with those on the same strains by a reference method in national co-ordinating laboratories. In addition, control strains were tested by some of the participants. Errors in reporting susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to teicoplanin and vancomycin and coagulase-negative staphylococci to vancomycin were < 1%. With coagulase-negative staphylococci however, 44 (3.4%) teicoplanin susceptible isolates were reported intermediate and six (0.4%) resistant; 18 (58.1%) of 31 teicoplanin intermediate isolates were reported susceptible and five (16.1%) resistant; and six of nine teicoplanin resistant isolates were reported susceptible and two intermediate. All seven isolates of enterococci intermediate to vancomycin were reported susceptible. Distribution of a known vancomycin intermediate strain of E. gallinarum indicated problems with vancomycin susceptibility testing (44.4% reported susceptible, 32.7% intermediate, 32.1% resistant) and identification (only 34.1% correct) of this organism. Two of 28 teicoplanin resistant enterococci and three of 30 vancomycin resistant isolates were reported susceptible. Among other organisms, one resistant Lactobacillus sp. was reported susceptible to teicoplanin and vancomycin. In reporting teicoplanin susceptible organisms, there were fewer errors with comparative/Stokes methods than with most other methods and more errors with the ATB and Sceptor methods than most other methods. None of the methods used were reliable for testing teicoplanin intermediate and resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci or low-level vancomycin resistant enterococci. Alternative methods, such as breakpoint screening, should be considered for detecting glycopeptide resistance.     

Ceftazidime plus amikacin plus teicoplanin or vancomycin in the empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients

A prospective randomized trial was performed to compare teicoplanin to vancomycin as part of the empirical antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Fifty-three patients were randomized to receive ceftazidime (100 mg/kg daily every 8 h), amikacin (15 mg/kg daily every 8 h) and teicoplanin (6 mg/kg once a day) and 53 other patients received ceftazidime, amikacin (same dosages) and vancomycin (30 mg/kg/day every 6 h). In 99 evaluable episodes, the success rates were 54% for patients receiving teicoplanin and 52% for patients receiving vancomycin (p=0.76, 95% CI-18-23). The response rates were similar for patients with unexplained fever and for patients with documented infections. There were no differences in renal toxicity or cutaneous side effects between the two groups. The overall death rate was 18.9%, with 10 deaths in each group. The most important factor associated with death was the diagnosis of a fungal infection (p=0.001). Teicoplanin seems to be well tolerated and as effective as vancomycin in the empirical antibiotic therapy of fever in neutropenic cancer patients.     

Randomised comparison of ceftazidime and imipenem as initial monotherapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients

With the availability of new, broad-spectrum antibiotics, initial therapy with a single agent has become an alternative to classic combinations in the management of febrile, neutropenic cancer patients. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime and imipenem as empirical monotherapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, and to examine the frequency with which second-line antibiotics (amikacin, vancomycin, or both) were required. A prospective clinical trial was carried out in a single centre. Eligible patients with solid tumours or lymphoma were randomised to receive monotherapy with ceftazidime or imipenem. In the event of no response, amikacin and/or vancomycin were added in 48-72 h intervals (sequentially, or according to clinical or microbiological data). Efficacy was evaluable for 111 assessable episodes. Median neutrophil count at entry was 100 cells/microliters and median duration of neutropenia was 4 days. Febrile episodes were classified as microbiologically (34%) or clinically documented (42%), and fever of unknown origin (24%). Gram-negative infections (57%) predominated over gram-positive isolates (30%). The overall success rate with monotherapy (69% versus 70%), or with modification (20% versus 23%) were equivalent for ceftazidime and imipenem (P = 0.75). The mortality in this series was 5%. Single-agent therapy with either ceftazidime or imipenem is effective for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with solid tumours. Early addition of amikacin and/or vancomycin resolves most failures of the first step.     

Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of somatostatin and biogenic amines in grown primates reared by mothers exposed to manipulated foraging conditions

The glycopeptide antibacterial drugs, vancomycin and teicoplanin, are widely used in hospitals for therapy of severe or multiresistant infection that has a positive results on Gram's stain test. Although vancomycin resistance is common in some hospital-acquired Enterococcus sp and resistance to teicoplanin occurs among Staphylococci sp glycopeptides remain the cornerstone of therapy for infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus organisms, and infection related to implanted devices. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these agents remains controversial, but advances in our understanding of their pharmacodynamics and further clinical studies are helping clarify the situation. In the future, a more rational approach to monitoring will probably result in less intensive monitoring of vancomycin but more intensive monitoring of teicoplanin.     

Bacteriologic surveillance of nosocomial septicemia and bacteremia in a pediatric hospital

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature pertaining to the use of adjunctive thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted (January 1966-December 1997) to find articles using the terms peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis, and each thrombolytic drug. References from these articles were then reviewed to identify further sources. DATA EXTRACTION: Representative case reports and clinical trials are summarized in this report. Information regarding thrombolytic dosing, administration techniques, and reported efficacy rates are included from both case reports and clinical trials. DISCUSSION: Thrombolytic agents administered intraperitoneally appear to facilitate antibiotic penetration into the biofilm formed by certain bacteria. Numerous case reports of intraperitoneal thrombolytic adjunctive therapy for recurrent or persistent PDAP have indicated that these agents may have a role in the treatment of selected patients. Urokinase and streptokinase are the only thrombolytics that have been studied. They appear to have similar efficacy, but the adverse drug event rate with streptokinase is unacceptably high. The efficacy of therapy with urokinase is probably inferior to removal of the peritoneal dialysis catheter, but, if successful, allows for the continuation of peritoneal dialysis therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In conjunction with appropriate antibiotic therapy, intraperitoneal instillation of urokinase should be reserved for patients who develop two or more episodes of recurrent or persistent PDAP in the absence of poor compliance and in whom dialysis catheter removal should be avoided (i.e., they cannot tolerate hemodialysis).     

Activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against penicillin-resistant pneumococci in vitro and in vivo and correlation to pharmacokinetic parameters in the mouse peritonitis model

The activities of glycopeptides against pneumococci were studied in vitro and in vivo. The MICs of two glycopeptides, vancomycin and teicoplanin, in different media against 10 strains of pneumococci with different susceptibilities to penicillin were determined. The MICs of teicoplanin were four times lower than those of vancomycin in Mueller-Hinton media supplemented with 5% blood, but the MICs were similar in mouse and human sera supplemented with 5% blood. The serum protein binding levels in mouse and human sera were 90% for teicoplanin in both and 25 and 35%, respectively, for vancomycin. The MICs for vancomycin and teicoplanin were only correlated in human serum (P < 0.001). The single doses giving protection to 50% of the animals in the mouse peritonitis model after a lethal challenge of pneumococci, the ED50s, were similar for vancomycin and teicoplanin, between 0.1 and 1 mg/kg of body weight for all 10 strains. The log ED50s were significantly correlated only to the log MICs of teicoplanin determined for mouse serum with 5% blood (P = 0.01) and to the log MICs of vancomycin determined by the E test (P = 0.03). Among the pharmacokinetic parameters analyzed at the ED50s, the most constant parameter was the time for which the drug concentration exceeded the MIC (T(>MIC)) when each drug was considered separately; however, when both drugs were considered together, the maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) varied the least. This indicates that both these parameters are of importance for predicting the effect of the drugs. We conclude that the effect of glycopeptides was not influenced by the penicillin resistance of the pneumococci, either in vitro or in vivo, and that the superior activity of teicoplanin over that of vancomycin in vitro was abolished in vivo, an effect which probably was due to the high serum protein binding of teicoplanin. Both the pharmacokinetic parameters T(>MIC) and Cmax are important predicting the effect of glycopeptides, but the pharmacodynamics of glycopeptides are still not completely elucidated.     

A closer look at vancomycin, teicoplanin, and antimicrobial resistance

The worldwide increase in the incidence of resistant Gram-positive infections has renewed interest in the glycopeptide class of antimicrobial agents. Two glycopeptides are available in many parts of the world--vancomycin and teicoplanin. These two agents appear to differ in several respects, including: potential for selecting microbial resistance, dosing convenience, safety, and efficacy in severe infection. Teicoplanin appears to have lower toxicity and greater convenience; however, its widespread acceptance has been plagued by concerns over antimicrobial resistance, efficacy, and appropriate dosing. A review of available studies suggests that teicoplanin, when dosed at 6 mg/kg/day, is better tolerated than vancomycin 15 mg/kg/q12h; however, at these doses, it appears to be somewhat less effective than vancomycin in serious Staphylococcus aureus infection, such as endocarditis. Although higher doses of teicoplanin, 12 mg/kg/day to 30 mg/kg/day, have been associated with efficacy comparable to that of vancomycin in serious S. aureus infections, such doses may eliminate some of the safety advantages conferred by lower teicoplanin doses. Teicoplanin has been associated with resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci and the selection of resistance in S. aureus. There is some evidence that widespread use of teicoplanin might accelerate the development of S. aureus resistance to both teicoplanin and vancomycin. The selection of an appropriate glycopeptide in an individual patient should be based not only on convenience, but also on a determination of optimal efficacy, safety at an efficacious dose, and the potential for resistance.     

A case of Buerger''s disease solitary involved in the left subclavian and axillary artery

The pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime have been investigated in eight patients with chronic renal failure undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Each subject was given ceftazidime 1 g intravenously and 1 g intraperitoneally at an interval of 1 week. Ceftazidime was assayed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. After intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftazidime were: elimination plasma half-life (t1/2 beta) = 24.6 +/- 4.6 hours; apparent volume of distribution (V(area)): 0.37 +/- 0.09 1/kg, total plasma clearance (CL): 11.9 +/- 3.3 mL/minute, peritoneal clearance (CLp): 1.7 +/- 0.3 mL/minute. Over 72 hours, only 15.6 +/- 4.7% of the dose was eliminated by the peritoneal route. After intraperitoneal administration, ceftazidime appeared in the plasma rapidly, and the peak plasma concentration of 24.5 +/- 5.2 mg/L was achieved at the fourth hour; the elimination half-life (t1/2ke) was 20.8 +/- 1.7 hours. The absorption of ceftazidime from the peritoneal space was 74.1 +/- 7.4%. These data suggest that ceftazidime has bidirectional exchange characteristics through the peritoneal membrane. A single 1-g intraperitoneal dose led to serum and dialysate concentrations of ceftazidime above the minimum concentrations for susceptible pathogen germs for 24 hours.     

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is present in effluents of patients with Gram-negative and Gram-positive CAPD peritonitis

BACKGROUND: Bacterial peritonitis is a frequent complication during treatment of end-stage renal failure by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Local host defence mechanisms including the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by peritoneal macrophages are of particular importance in the pathogenesis of infectious complications. LPS-binding protein (LBP) and soluble CD14 (sCD14) are serum factors known to regulate the endotoxin-induced cellular immune response. However, it is still unknown whether LBP and sCD14 are also present in the peritoneal effluent of CAPD patients. METHODS: Using specific immunoassays, we examined the concentration of LBP, sCD14 and the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-6 in the dialysis effluents of 31 patients with CAPD-associated peritonitis. Twenty patients without peritonitis served as controls. Intraperitoneal LPS concentrations were determined using the limulus amebocyte lysate assay. RESULTS: Bacterial lipopolysaccharide could be detected in 42% of the infected dialysis effluents. In comparison to controls (0.2 +/- 0.05 microg/ml), LBP was significantly elevated in both gram-negative/LPS-positive (1.03 +/- 0.3 microg/ml) and gram-positive infections (0.5 +/- 0.14 microg/ml) (P<0.05). No significant differences were detected concerning the intraperitoneal sCD14 levels in the three patient groups. Levels of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and IL-6 were significantly increased in the effluents of patients with bacterial peritonitis compared to noninfected controls. Moreover the respective cytokine concentrations were significantly higher in the gram-negative/LPS-positive compared to the gram-positive bacterial infections (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that LBP is significantly elevated in the dialysis effluents of patients with CAPD-associated peritonitis caused by both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria and might be used as a marker of intraperitoneal infection. Moreover, our findings support the concept that LBP enhances the effects of LPS on cytokine production by peritoneal macrophages. The function of LBP in gram-positive infection remains to be further elucidated.     

Characterization of staphylococci with reduced susceptibilities to vancomycin and other glycopeptides

During the last several years a series of staphylococcal isolates that demonstrated reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or other glycopeptides have been reported. We selected 12 isolates of staphylococci for which the vancomycin MICs were > or =4 microg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were > or =8 microg/ml and 24 control strains for which the vancomycin MICs were < or =2 microg/ml or for which the teicoplanin MICs were < or =4 microg/ml to determine the ability of commercial susceptibility testing procedures and vancomycin agar screening methods to detect isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. By PCR analysis, none of the isolates with decreased glycopeptide susceptibility contained known vancomycin resistance genes. Broth microdilution tests held a full 24 h were best at detecting strains with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility. Disk diffusion did not differentiate the strains inhibited by 8 microg of vancomycin per ml from more susceptible isolates. Most of the isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility were recognized by MicroScan conventional panels and Etest vancomycin strips. Sensititre panels read visually were more variable, although with some of the panels MICs of 8 microg/ml were noted for these isolates. Vitek results were 4 microg/ml for all strains for which the vancomycin MICs were > or =4 microg/ml. Vancomycin MICs on Rapid MicroScan panels were not predictive, giving MICs of either < or =2 or > or =16 microg/ml for these isolates. Commercial brain heart infusion vancomycin agar screening plates containing 6 microg of vancomycin per ml consistently differentiated those strains inhibited by 8 microg/ml from more susceptible strains. Vancomycin-containing media prepared in-house showed occasional growth of susceptible strains, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and on occasion, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Thus, strains of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides, such as vancomycin, are best detected in the laboratory by nonautomated quantitative tests incubated for a full 24 h. Furthermore, it appears that commercial vancomycin agar screening plates can be used to detect these isolates.     

Non-natural aglycones of glycopeptide antibiotics of the vancomycin group. Synthesis and antibacterial activity

A new approach for the modification of the heptapeptide core of glycopeptide antibiotics was proposed based on the replacement of amino acid residues in positions 1 and 3 in teicoplanin aglycone and in position 1 in the eremomycin aglycone. Six novel nonnatural aglycones of the vancomycin type were obtained. Compounds derived from the teicoplanin aglycone exhibited in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria, and two of them were also active against the vancomycin-resistant enterococci.     

Peritonitis influences mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients

Mortality remains high in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Known risk factors for mortality include age, diabetes, race, initial albumin level, and cardiovascular disease. Peritonitis is reported to cause death in 1 to 6% of PD patients but has not been well studied as a risk factor for mortality. This study examined 516 adults with a total of 896 yr on PD at one center to determine if peritonitis influenced mortality. Time at risk began on Day 1 of training and ended at death, transplant, or 60 days after transfer to hemodialysis or intermittent peritoneal dialysis. The overall mortality rate was 17.4/100 patient yr. Survival was lower for whites, men, diabetic patients, and older patients. Independent risk factors for mortality (by Cox proportional hazards) were race, diabetes, increased age, and increased peritonitis rate. Use of the Y-set was not associated with decreased mortality. Peritonitis was a risk factor only in whites, nondiabetic patients, and those patients over the age of 60. For every 0.5/yr increase in the peritonitis rate, the risk of death increased 10% in whites, 11% in those patients who were over the age of 60, and 4% for nondiabetic patients. Mortality rates did not decrease over time (1979 to 1995), although peritonitis rates fell significantly (P < 0.001). Rates of Gram-negative and fungal peritonitis showed no trend over time. Peritonitis contributed to 25 of 158 (15.8%) of deaths. Gram-negative/fungal peritonitis accounted for 14 deaths (9.5% of all Gram-negative/fungal episodes) whereas Staphylococcus epidermidis accounted for only 1 death (0.5% of all S. epidermidis episodes) (P < 0.001). Cardiovascular disease was more common in those patients whose deaths were unrelated to peritonitis (P < 0.01), whereas an infectious cause was more common in those patients whose deaths were peritonitis-related (P < 0.001). In this study, peritonitis was a risk factor for death in whites, nondiabetic patients, and older patients. However, the Y-set did not improve survival, perhaps because it does not decrease Gram-negative/fungal peritonitis. To have an impact on survival, efforts are needed to reduce the peritonitis that results from these more serious pathogens.     

Successful single-dose teicoplanin prophylaxis against experimental streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal aortic valve endocarditis

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that is administered both intramuscularly and intravenously. It has a prolonged half-life and a less toxic profile in comparison to those of vancomycin. The efficacy of a single dose of teicoplanin (18 mg/kg of body weight given intramuscularly) for the prevention of endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis, Enterococcus faecium, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was evaluated after applying the rabbit model. Vancomycin at a single dose of 30 mg/kg given intravenously was used as the comparative agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to MRSA and E. faecium, while ampicillin at a single dose of 40 mg/kg given intravenously was used as the comparative agent for the prevention of endocarditis due to S. oralis. Rabbits in the teicoplanin group were infected at 1 h postdosing with approximately 10(7) CFU of each strain. Rabbits in the other groups were infected at 0.5 h postdosing with approximately 10(7) CFU of S. oralis (ampicillin group) or E. faecium and MRSA (vancomycin group). All rabbits were sacrificed 5 days later. Teicoplanin and vancomycin protected the animals challenged with E. faecium by 87.5 and 50%, respectively, and protected the animals challenged with MRSA by 100 and 92%, respectively. Teicoplanin and ampicillin protected the animals challenged with S. oralis by 100 and 77%, respectively. Prevention of endocarditis by teicoplanin was likely to be due to a prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth by the sustained supra-MICs. It is concluded that teicoplanin is very effective in preventing experimental streptococcal, enterococcal, and staphylococcal endocarditis and may be an attractive alternative antibiotic in patients allergic to beta-lactams, especially in the outpatient setting.     

Should vancomycin be used empirically in febrile patients with prolonged and profound neutropenia? Results of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a randomized trial with ceftazidine alone or associated with amikacin or vancomycin to investigate the efficacy of the daily 3 g dosage of ceftazidime and the efficacy of monotherapy with ceftazidime and to determine if vancomycin should be added empirically. METHODS: Patient inclusion criteria were: age over 10 years, therapeutically-induced neutropenia and fever for at least three hours above 38.5 degrees C in absence of a clear non-infectious aetiology. Patients were randomized into three groups: group C, ceftazidime alone 3 g/day; group CA, ceftazidime 3 g/day plus amikacin 15 mg/kg/day; or group C, ceftazidime 3 g/day plus vancomycin 1.5 g/day. RESULTS: Results from one hundred and two episodes of fever were analyzed. The underlying diseases were haematological malignancies (89 patients) and solid tumours (13 patients). The median duration of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9) PMN/L) was 18 days and the minimum duration of 7 days. The main criterion for the analysis of efficacy was the onset of a major infectious event, i.e. death related to documented or suspected infection and any infectious event considered life-threatening or hindering future treatment of the underlying disease. Eight (22%) patients in group C developed major infectious events compared with four (13%) in group CA and none in group CV (p < 0.01). Major infectious events were mainly due to Gram-positive organisms, particularly Streptococcus species. CONCLUSION: We conclude that: 1) ceftazidime alone and in association with amikacin is effective in preventing Gram-negative major infectious events; and 2) vancomycin should not be added only when a Gram-positive infection is documented, but used empirically.     

A fundamental study of 99mTc-HMPAO double injection method and clinical application to stress scintigraphy in orthostatic hypotension

Enterococcus faecium, which was highly resistant to vancomycin (MIC 256 mg/liter), but susceptible to teicoplanin (MIC 2 mg/liter), caused two distinct episodes of infection on a renal unit in the United Kingdom. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) indicated that a single strain caused the first episode, while the second episode, which occurred 1 year later, involved multiple strains, all of which were distinct from the original strain. Vancomycin resistance in all but one of these strains was mediated by transferable plasmids that carried the vanB glycopeptide resistance gene. Transfer either of resistance plasmids or the vanB resistance determinant itself to different strains occurred during the second episode. Plasmid-mediated vanB resistance has not been widely documented. A retrospective study of a reference collection revealed two other vanB-encoding plasmids from an E. faecalis and an E. faecium referred from two further UK centers. Although restriction analysis indicated no similarity between the plasmids from the three different centers, all contained a 2.1-kb EcoRV fragment that hybridized with a probe for the vanB gene. This suggests that there has been dissemination of a conserved glycopeptide resistance determinant, of which vanB is a part.     

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin during hemodialysis therapy using high-flux polysulfone membranes

Teicoplanin is a new glycopeptide antibiotic with potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria. It has been considered to be non-dialyzable due to its high molecular weight (1875-1891 d) and high protein binding (89%). Therefore, a reduced dose was recommended for patients on hemodialysis therapy, with the loading dose being followed by a considerably lower maintenance dose and/or extension of the interval between doses. The present study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin during hemodialysis therapy using high flux membranes. The pharmacokinetic parameters of teicoplanin were studied in 15 patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. A high flux polysulfone membrane (ultrafiltration coefficient of 40 ml/h/mmHg) was used. Teicoplanin was administered at a dosage of 10 mg.kg-1 body weight in 100 ml isotonic saline solution during the first 10 minutes of hemodialysis therapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a three compartment analysis. After a single dose of teicoplanin plasma peak levels were 26.4 +/- 12.0 micrograms/mL (mean +/- SD) after 30 minutes. Teicoplanin concentrations rapidly declined to a nadir of 6.1 +/- 2.5 micrograms/mL at the end of the 3.5-hour session dialysis. Extracorporeal clearance was 39.7 +/- 24.5 mL/min. Removal of 19.3 +/- 7.7% of the drug was estimated if infused during hemodialysis. T 1/2 alpha were 0.37 +/- 0.25 hrs, t 1/2 beta 20.1 +/- 7.1 hrs, and t 1/2 gamma 549.7 +/- 210.5 hrs. We conclude that teicoplanin levels are reduced to a subtherapeutic range during one single high-flux dialysis session if the drug is administered during hemodialysis. Thus, in contrast to previous suggestions relevant amounts of teicoplanin are removed during hemodialysis and thus teicoplanin cannot be viewed as non-dialyzable drug. We recommend obligatory drug monitoring to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations.     

Structural and biochemical changes in lungs of 3-methylindole-treated rats

This study compared co-amoxiclav, vancomycin and teicoplanin with and without netilmicin or amikacin for treating experimental subcutaneous fibrin-clot infection in rabbits due to a clinical beta-lactamase-positive methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain (MGRSE). MICs (mg/L) for this strain were: oxacillin 125, gentamicin 32, vancomycin 4, teicoplanin 8, netilmicin 1, amikacin 4, amoxycillin 64 with clavulanate at 2 mg/L. In rabbits treated with a single-dose i.v. regimen (netilmicin 8 mg/kg, amikacin 20 mg/kg, vancomycin 30 mg/kg, teicoplanin 15 mg/kg, co-amoxiclav 150-30 mg/kg), the bacterial count 24 h post-dose was reduced whatever the combination used (ANOVA, P < or = 0.001). Regimens were statistically classified in decreasing order of efficacy as follows: co-amoxiclav combined with netilmicin > vancomycin either alone or combined with either netilmicin or amikacin, teicoplanin with netilmicin > netilmicin and co-amoxiclav alone > teicoplanin or co-amoxiclav combined with amikacin, and teicoplanin alone > amikacin > no drug. From these findings, it is concluded that: co-amoxiclav could be useful for the treatment of beta-lactamase-positive and methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis infection; some enzyme-resistant aminoglycoside could be considered for treating gentamicin-resistant but netilmicin/amikacin-sensitive S. epidermidis infection; the combination of co-amoxiclav with netilmicin was synergistic and more rapidly bactericidal than vancomycin in this animal model.     

Bacteremia complicating peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients

Bacteremia is a rare complication of peritonitis in end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients treated by peritoneal dialysis. Three of our ESRF patients on peritoneal dialysis developed bacteremia during a peritonitis episode (1/19 peritonitis episodes). In 2 cases, the responsible organism was Escherichia coli and peritonitis was most likely associated with infection of the biliary tract. The 3rd patient had a perforation of the colon and Klebsiella spp. was the infective organism. Only the last patient survived but had to be transferred to hemodialysis. Bacteremia during peritonitis is infrequent in peritoneal dialysis patients and it appears to be related to other intra-abdominal events.     

Meropenem versus ceftazidime plus amikacin in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients: a randomized study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Meropenem is the first of a new class of carbapenems which may be administered without cilastatin. This study was performed to assess the clinical efficacy and tolerability of meropenem monotherapy (1 g/8 h) compared with the standard combination of ceftazidime (2 g/8 h) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg/day) for the empirical treatment of infective febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients. METHODS: This was a three-center, randomized, non-blind parallel group trial. The primary objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of meropenem monotherapy with that of ceftazidime plus amikacin in the empirical treatment of febrile infective episodes in neutropenic patients. This was evaluated by the number of patients surviving on unmodified therapy at 72 h (primary end point) and by the clinical response at the end of therapy (secondary end point). RESULTS: A total of 93 febrile episodes (46 meropenem, 47 ceftazidime/amikacin) were evaluable. Bone marrow transplant patients accounted for 49.5% of all cases. There was a high incidence of Gram-positive infections but no pseudomonal infections. Microbiologically documented infections, clinically documented infections and unexplained fever accounted for 45%, 10% and 45% of episodes, respectively. There was a similar proportion of patients in the meropenem and ceftazidime/amikacin groups on unmodified empiric therapy at 72 h (80.4% vs 76.6%, p = 0.65,) and cured at the end of therapy (37% vs 36.2%, p = 0.9). No significant difference in tolerability was observed between the groups. Meropenem was well tolerated; of note, there were no cases of nausea/vomiting or seizure related to its use. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Meropenem monotherapy was well tolerated and produced response rates similar to those obtained with ceftazidime/amikacin. The low overall success rates with both treatments concur with those of other recent studies and are probably due to a combination of several factors, including the adoption of strict assessment criteria.