Cochlear implantation of children with minimal open-set speech recognition skills

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative performance of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant with a view toward expanding the selection criteria for cochlear implant candidacy to include children who derive minimal benefit from amplification. DESIGN: Pre- and postoperative performance of two groups of children were compared. Group 1 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated some open-set speech recognition skills before receiving a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant (Borderline group). Group 2 consisted of 12 children who demonstrated no open-set speech recognition skills before implantation with a Nucleus device (Traditional group). In all children, candidacy was determined based on preimplant binaural aided performance. For most subjects, the poorer ear was selected for implantation. Mean pre- and postoperative speech recognition scores of the Borderline subjects were compared to determine the benefit provided by their cochlear implants. Secondly, matched-pair analyses were used to compare the mean speech recognition scores obtained by the Borderline and Traditional subjects. RESULTS: The scores of the Borderline group improved significantly on five of six speech recognition measures when 6 mo postoperative scores obtained with the implant were compared with preoperative test scores obtained with hearing aids. By the 12 mo postoperative interval, the scores of the Borderline group had improved significantly (p < 0.05) on all six measures. In contrast, scores obtained by the Traditional group had improved significantly on three of six measures at both the 6 and 12 mo postoperative intervals. Comparison of postoperative test scores revealed that the Borderline group scored significantly higher than the Traditional group on three of six measures at the 6 mo test interval and on six of six measures at the 12 mo test interval (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that both groups derive significant benefit from their cochlear implants. Although the mean preoperative audiograms for the implanted ears did not differ significantly for the two groups of subjects, members of the Borderline group exhibited significantly better speech recognition skills than the Traditional group during the first year after implantation. These findings suggest that the increased auditory experience of the Borderline subjects positively influenced their performance with a cochlear implant. The authors advocate that the selection criteria used to determine pediatric cochlear implant candidacy be broadened to include consideration of children who demonstrate minimal open-set speech recognition skills.     

Indications for middle ear obliteration within the scope of cochlear implant management

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants have gained worldwide acceptance as a reliable method of rehabilitation of profoundly hearing-impaired patients. Due to thorough patient selection major postoperative complications rarely occur and are flap related in most cases. Deafness can develop during chronic suppurative otitis media, either coincidentally or secondary to the medical treatment; normally this condition is regarded as a contraindication for cochlear implantation. In cases with a mastoid cavity after surgical treatment for cholesteatoma, the electrode covered only by the epithelial lining will likely become exposed or extruded. Therefore we suggest the obliteration of the middle ear cleft with abdominal fat and the blindsac closure of the external ear canal before cochlear implantation in these conditions. PATIENTS: The average age of our 12 patients was 48 years, whereas the youngest was 2 1/2 years of age. Due to chronic inflammatory ear disease. 11 patients had a mastoid cavity on both ears. Eight patients had a cholesteatoma, the chronic bone destroying process in the temporal bone of two female patients was considered as a fibroinflammatory pseudotumor. The child had a congenital deafness in both ears with a Mondini dysplasia in CT scan. She had already developed two episodes of pneumococcal meningitis which was caused by a defect in the stapes footplate through which a liquor-filled cystic sac herniated in the middle ear. Because of a massive liquorrhoea after opening of the sac, we decided to obliterate the middle ear cleft after successful insertion of the electrode array. RESULTS: All active electrodes of 10 Nucleus implants (Cochlear) and two Clarion devices (Advanced Bionics Corp.) were successfully inserted in the cochlea of the 12 patients. After an average follow-up of 15 months, a temporary facial palsy in one patient and an insufficient closure of a retroauricular fistula over the mastoid cavity in two cases were observed as postoperative complications. One patient with a fibroinflammatory pseudotumor developed a massive inflammatory reaction in the implanted ear two months after cochlear implantation, which could not be controlled by conservative treatment. The implant had to be removed and local conditions settled after administration of immunosuppressive treatment with cyclophosphamide. The patient received a new implant seven months ago. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a foreign body in a potentially infected space which communicates intracranially means a surgical challenge which can be managed by obliteration of the middle ear after subtotal petrosectomy with abdominal wall fat combined with a reliable closure of the external ear canal. In case of massive inflammation we would prefer a two-stage procedure.     

Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders

Cochlear implants have proven to be effective and reliable in postlingually deaf adults. This is also true for congenitally deaf and perilingually deaf children up to the age of six years. Due to the increasing experience, the improvement of implant technology and the proven reliability the selection criteria are broadened with shifting borders. The main extensions are related to age, additional handicaps, residual hearing and special etiologies of deafness. Increasing evidence shows that very early implantation results in better performance and better hearing and speech development. Near-normal language acquisition can be achieved in children implanted under the age of four. Additional handicaps do not automatically exclude a candidate from cochlear implantation. A case-to-case decision has to be made based on additional diagnostics and the experience of the implant centre. A list of suitable handicaps is provided. Severely hearing impaired patients may also be considered for cochlear implantation if their residual hearing provides no benefit for speech discrimination. The same holds true for children. Cochlear implantation in obliterated cochleae and inner ear malformation requires a special surgical technique and special electrode arrays. In this way even difficult cases can be managed with remarkable outcome. Over all, the selection criteria have been broadened with increasing experience and technological improvement. This development may continue and the borderline between hearing aids and cochlear implants will shift further towards severe hearing loss. However, the basis for success still remains good rehabilitation, a team approach and the willingness of the patient to undergo the whole process of cochlear implantation.     

Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations

We performed a case study and intervention study, with follow-up of 1 to 5 years, in 4 children with inner ear malformations who underwent implantation of a multichannel cochlear implant (Nucleus, Cochlear Corporation) at ages 3 to 12 years. Malformations included a common cavity deformity, 2 incomplete partitions, and 1 case of isolated bilateral vestibular aqueduct enlargement. One child had a single-channel implant placed at 3 years of age, and this was exchanged for a 22-channel implant at age 9. One child had her implant placed at age 4.5 years, but due to complications from a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak had the initial implant removed and replaced at age 5 years during repair of the CSF leak. Intraoperative findings included a CSF leak at the time of surgery in 3 patients. One patient contracted bacterial meningitis 7 months postimplantation that was thought to be secondary to acute otitis media in the unoperated ear. Bilateral CSF leaks were noted in the middle ear by a lumbar puncture radionuclide and fluorescein dye study. Successful repair of the CSF leaks and reimplantation of the cochlear implant was carried out in this patient. Mapping and programming of the implant was found to be challenging in each of these patients. All patients demonstrated improved performance after implantation. Two patients demonstrated some open-set speech perception. One patient demonstrates improved use of temporal cues in a structured closed set. One patient has achieved no significant speech recognition at this time, but does have improved sound detection and awareness. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital inner ear abnormalities can be a successful method of rehabilitation. It should be recognized that the postoperative speech perception results may be highly variable among patients, and that intraoperative complications may occur.     

Criteria and procedures for selection of children with acquired or congenital deafness for cochlear implants in Europe

The Nucleus Mini System 22 cochlear implant has been implanted in over 2,000 children worldwide. Selection criteria have evolved similar to that for adults since implantation in children began in 1985. The appropriate selection of children for implantation is made by a professional pediatric team which considers audiological and non-audiological issues in determining if the child is a cochlear implant candidate. The main philosophy is to establish if the child has the potential to benefit from a cochlear implant.     

Interaction between bile salts and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists

Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) in profoundly deaf patients is a contraindication for cochlear implantation. Eight (6%) of the 126 patients referred to cochlear implantation at this center between 1986 and 1992 became deafened as a result of bilateral CSOM but were otherwise suitable candidates. This study details the methods used in four patients to prepare the septic ear for a sterile device. Two patients had wet radical cavities with residual cholesteatoma, and two had discharging safe perforations resistant to surgical repair. Obliteration of the middle ear cleft with blind pit closure of the ear canal was attempted in all four patients, and cochlear implants were installed at a second operation 3 to 6 months later. The hearing results were as good as in implanted patients without CSOM, and the only complication has been the finding of a cholesteatoma pearl at the second operation in one patient. Fat obliteration of the mastoid and middle ear with blind pit closure of the ear canal can be adapted to make most chronic ears fit for implantation, if the patient is prepared to undergo two operations.     

Cochlear implantation: a review of the literature and the Nijmegen results

The field of cochlear implantation is developing rapidly. In subjects with bilateral profound deafness who gain no benefit from conventional hearing aids the aim of cochlear implantation is to provide a means for them to receive auditory sensations. Throughout the world, most cochlear implant centres are still continuing their research efforts to improve the results with this technique. Although it is still difficult to predict how an individual will perform with a cochlear implant, the success of cochlear implantation can no longer be denied. In this paper, we review some recent papers and reports, and the results of the various Nijmegen cochlear implant studies. Data about subject selection, examinations, surgery and the outcome are discussed. Our results were in good agreement with those of other authors. It can be concluded once again that cochlear implantation is an effective treatment for postlingually deaf adults and children, and for prelingually (congenital or acquired) deaf children with profound bilateral sensorineural deafness.     

Cochlear implants in children: an analysis of use over a three-year period

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether children continue to wear their cochlear implant systems 1 and 3 years after implantation. STUDY DESIGN: The design was a prospective study based on the analysis of forced-choice questionnaires on implant use completed independently by parents and teachers. SETTING: The study was performed at a dedicated pediatric cochlear implant program in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS: All 85 consecutively implanted children who had reached the 1-year interval after implantation and 37 children who had reached the 3-year assessment interval after implantation participated. The patients represented all socioeconomic status groups, the entire range of educational settings, and often lived at a considerable distance from the implant center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parents and local teachers were asked to describe implant use in the following categories: 1) all of the time; 2) most of the time; 3) some of the time; and 4) none of the time. RESULTS: One year after implantation, parents and teachers, respectively, rated 79 (93%) and 82 (96%) children as full-time users (category 1). Parents rated six children (7%) as users most of the time (category 2), and teachers rated three children (4%) as users most of the time. No child was rated as an occasional or nonuser (category 3 or 4). At 3 years after implantation, 33 (89%) and 34 (95%) children were rated as full-time users (category 1) by parents and teachers, respectively. Parents judged four children (11%) and teachers rated two children (5%) to be users most of the time (category 2). Again, no child was rated in category 3 or 4 as an occasional or nonuser. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of implanted children use their implant systems all of the time over a 3-year period after implantation when selected appropriately and given appropriate follow-up.     

Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique

It is commonly accepted that the intracochlear placement of the cochlear implant electrode is potentially damaging to the hearing rests which may exist. Consequently, cochlear implants have been recommended for totally deaf ears only. The question has been raised whether or not it is possible to preserve residual hearing during intracochlear implantation through extremely careful surgical techniques. Experience has shown, that the cochleotomy of the scala tympani anterior to the round window niche, careful preservation of the fibrine endost layer and the use of Healon are amongst the surgical procedures described which may assist in retaining the rest function of the inner ear. These observations which are discussed in detail suggest that the experienced surgeon can effect preservation of residual hearing for patients who cannot derive significant benefits from conventional acoustic amplifiers.     

Cochlear implants in children

Cochlear implants are no longer considered new or experimental technology. Difficulty in evaluating the degree of hearing loss and response to traditional forms of amplification in young children makes pediatric cochlear implant candidacy a complex issue. Cochlear implantation and, in particular, pediatric cochlear implantation, requires a team commitment with contributions from surgeons, audiologists, speech pathologists, psychologists, and special educators. Elements discussed include assessment and candidacy issues, surgical technique, elements of a cochlear implant team, outcome assessment, and potential complications. The decision to perform pediatric cochlear implantation should not be undertaken without serious consideration to the enormous commitment required in both financial and personnel terms.     

Replacement of ear ossicles with titanium prostheses

BACKGROUND: Titanium has been a well established implant material for many years. New material processing techniques now permit the manufacture of small implants for ossicular chain reconstruction. METHODS: Between November 1994 and September 1995, 100 titanium middle ear implants (55 PORP, 45 TORP) were used for reconstruction of the ossicular chain. A range of five different sizes for partial and total protheses suits all implantation needs. The shape of the implants can be altered by bending. Time consuming intraoperative shaping and trimming is avoided. RESULTS: At a follow-up time of three months (33 patients) and six months (17 patients), no adverse reactions or extrusions occurred. Biologic fixation between the foot of the partial prothesis and the head of the stapes was found eight months after implantation. A hearing result of 0-20 dB residual air-bone gap was achieved in 79%. CONCLUSION: Titanium middle ear implants show good bio-compatibility and are readily integrated into the ossicular chain. Although delicate in shape, they offer excellent mechanical properties in respect to sound conduction and implantation. Initial results show Titanium to be a perfect implant material for middle ear prostheses, although long-term results are not yet available.     

The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users

Electrically evoked brainstem responses (EABR) and event-related cortical potentials were recorded in seven postlingually deaf adults who were experienced users of a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. The patients were divided into two subgroups: good performers and moderate performers. Poor EABR were found in two of the moderate performers. The latencies and amplitudes of the cortical N1 P2 complex in the good performers were within the same range as those of subjects with normal hearing, but were deviant in the group of moderate performers. This may indicate disturbed cochleotopical organization of the auditory cortex in the latter group. P300 measurements in the good performers showed normal latencies, whereas in the moderate performers they were prolonged. The results suggest that the outcomes of electrophysiological measurements to assess the integrity of a patient's auditory neural system on a brainstem and a cortical level, are related to the patient's performance with the cochlear implant.     

Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection

In patients with some residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional hearing aids, the benefits of cochlear implantation have to be weighed carefully against eventual adverse effects. In this study, pre- and post-operative thresholds as well as functional results after cochlear implantation are reported; 17 of 44 implanted adults had residual hearing pre-operatively (mean threshold(250 to 4000 Hz): 106 dB HL) in the implanted ear. Residual hearing in the implanted ear could not, in general, be preserved post-operatively. Seventeen of 44 implanted children had some amount of residual hearing in the implanted ear pre-operatively (implanted ear: 114 dB HL; contralateral ear: 109.9 dB HL; mean thresholds(250 to 4000 Hz))). Contrary to the results in adults, residual hearing in the implanted ear remained statistically unchanged. Hearing in the contralateral ear increased significantly from 109.9 to 101.9 dB HL post-operatively. This increase was mainly attributed to maturation of the central auditory pathway. In adults with residual hearing, the monosyllable word recognition scores increased significantly from 9 per cent pre-operatively to 42 per cent post-operatively. Children with residual hearing tended to perform better on speech-related test material compared to children without prior auditory experience. Cochlear implantation is indicated in adults and children with residual hearing and minor benefit from conventional amplification. The contralateral ear in children should be considered for additional acoustical stimulation.     

Unilateral pulmonary vein atresia in early adulthood

Despite the fact that elderly people live frequently alone and frequently have difficulties of vision, is it reasonable to refuse to supply a patient with a cochlear implant only because he is too old? We compare the results of 87 post-lingually implantees as a function of age, less than 60 years (young) and 60 years or more (old). We assessed the implant efficacy using the Protocole Francophone d'Evaluation (PFE), appreciated the speech-therapist's opinion and the patient's satisfaction, and counted the number of hours per day the implant was used (H/D). The PFE score was significantly higher in young than old. However the speech-therapist's opinion and the patient's satisfaction as well as H/D did not differ significantly in the 2 series. Elderly people are supplied with a great benefit from cochlear implants. Therefore age is not a contraindication for implantation.     

Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: This study compares auditory performance between original and replacement cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data from 18 U.S. cochlear implant programs were obtained by retrospective chart review. Patients received and returned subjective questionnaires. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight adults with once-functioning Nucleus 22 cochlear implants that failed received replacement Nucleus 22 cochlear implants in the same ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective measures included sentence (CID Everyday Sentences or Iowa Sentences) and monosyllabic word (NU-6 Words or CNC Words) speech discrimination scores. Patients also rated and compared performance using subjective scales. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients had significantly higher sentence or word scores with their replacement cochlear implants than with their original implants, 26% had no significant change, and 37% had significantly poorer scores. Subjectively, 57% of patients reported that the performance of their replacement device was better or the same and 43% reported that it was poorer. There was no correlation between performance with the replacement cochlear implant and cause of the original device failure, duration of original device use before failure, surgical complications with either implantation, changes in electrode insertion depths, or preoperative variables, such as age, etiology, or duration of deafness. CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition ability with a replacement cochlear implant may significantly increase or decrease from that with the original implant. Experienced cochlear implant patients facing reimplantation must be counseled regarding the possibility of differences in sound quality and speech recognition performance with their replacement device.     

Multichannel cochlear implantation with inner ear malformation: case report of performance and management

A small percentage of children who have received the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant have cochlear malformations of the inner ear and consequent partial electrode insertions. This case describes one child with a cochlear "common cavity" who received an implant at a young age. The case has been further complicated by a gradual malfunction of the electrode array, although the device has not failed completely. Despite the increase in the number of nonfunctional electrodes over time, the subject has continued to improve in auditory, speech production, and language development over a 30-month period. Methods are discussed for clinical monitoring of both performance and the stability of electrodes over time. The circumstances of this case reinforce the importance of postimplant collaboration with families and school staff and highlight the need for objective measures to evaluate both longitudinal changes in performance and device integrity.     

Oropharyngeal tumors of dogs--a clinical study of 79 cases

Secretory otitis media is defined as a fluid in the middle ear without signs or symptoms of infection. As the aetiology and pathogenesis of the disease are unknown, and as it affects children aged from 3 to 12 years, treatment procedures proposed for management of secretory otitis media, are not uniform. Some authors [1, 4, 6] consider that functional or mechanical obstructions of the Eustachian tube could provoke secretory otitis. The purpose of the treatment is to remove exudate from the middle ear and appropriately ventilate it for a longer period. That could instantly normalize the hearing and exclude the appearance of late complications of secretory otitis. Although the disease could heal spontaneously, the treatment should be performed immediately for preventing sequelae of secretory otitis. The aim of the study was to evaluate possible aetiologic factors of secretory otitis in our population, and to evaluate results of lympanometry in children with exudate in the middle ear. There were 65 children, aged from 3 to 12 years (Table 1), who complained of deafness and were examined at the ORL Department in Banja Luka. The clinical examination revealed the integrity and color of tympanic membrane, scars, adhesions and atrophic areas. Audiometry and tympanometry had been performed in addition. Patients who proved to have exudate in the middle ear received nasal decongestants and mucolitics during three months, and were evaluated every three weeks by audiometry and tympanometry. Pathologic findings in the nose and epipharynx were the most common findings: enlarged adenoids in 38 (58%) patients, hypetrophic rhinitis in 15 (23%) and allergic rhinitis in 5 (8%) patients. Frequent relapses of middle ear infection in the first three years of life were found in 26 (40%) patients and early first attacks in the first year of life in 15 (23%) patients (Table 2). Premature onset (15%) and allergy (21%) had also been frequently found. Results of tympanometry and audiometry are shown in Table 3. Exudate in the middle ear and type B tympanogram were found in 86 ears, while in other patients dysfunction of the Eustachian tube and type C1 and C2 tympanograms were found. After 6 weeks the exudate disappeared in 16 ears and tympanogram converted in type A and type C2, while the initially found C1 tympanogram was transformed in type A in 5 of 13 ears. After 12 weeks the tympanogram type B was found in 46 ears, while in 40 ears (47%) the tympanogram was changed in type A and type C2. After 6 and 12 weeks of therapy tympanometric types were statistically examined by chi 2 test. We have found a significant difference in tympanometric types and prevalence of type A and C1 tympanograms. Paracentesis and insertion of ventilating tubes were done in 46 ears with the remaining exudate. We have found mucous exudate in 35 (76%) ears associated with retraction and scars of tympanic membrane (Table 4), what indicated that the longer duration of mucous exudate caused degenerative changes in the middle ear. Serous exudate, found in 9 ears (24%), did not affect the color and integrity of the tympanic membrane. Sensitivity of tympanometry in detection of exudate in the middle ear was 96%. Secretory otitis media is a frequent disease in childhood, that could cause functional and morphological sequelae in the middle ear. As for now, there is no unique concept of diagnosis and treatment of the disease, and it is still a current problem. We suggest a three-month evaluation of tympanometric and audiometric patterns, repeated every three weeks, in children suspected of having exudate in the middle ear. There is a large trend of spontaneous disappearance of exudate in the middle ear and changing of tympanogram type. Such children should be evaluated over the period of one year, and if there is no relapse additional treatment should not be carried out. If exudate in the middle ear persists for three months and type of the tympanogram is unchanged, myringotomy and insert     

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in young children before and after tympanostomy tube placement

To evaluate the effect of tympanostomy tube placement upon the hearing function of infants and young children, brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) were recorded in a group of young children (mean age 22 mos) receiving this treatment for otitis media with effusion (OME). For comparison, a group of healthy infants with normal behavioral audiometry were also tested with BAEP. Hearing loss was estimated for each ear using peak V latency-intensity curves. To evaluate the immediate effect of tube placement, 98 ears in 52 children were tested immediately before and after tube insertion. The 63 ears with effusion had prolonged peak latencies that decreased significantly (P < 0.001) immediately after tube placement and a mean hearing loss estimate of 22 dB that improved significantly (P < 0.0001) to 11 dB immediately after tube insertion. The 35 ears without effusion at myringotomy had a mean hearing loss estimate of 8 dB that did not change significantly after tube insertion. To evaluate the short-term effect of tube presence, 39 ears in 25 children were tested 3 weeks to 18 months after tube insertion. The 28 ears with dry tubes had a mean hearing loss estimate of 3 dB, and the 11 ears with otorrhea had a mean hearing loss estimate of 31 dB. The magnitude of mean hearing loss estimates in these young children with OME and the improvement in hearing function with tube placement is similar to that reported in older children studied with BAEP and audiometry. The study groups with a history of otitis media that had resolved by the time of testing had isolated prolongation of mean III-V interpeak latencies compared to normals (P < 0.01). These studies show that BAEP techniques are useful in estimating hearing loss in children with OME who are difficult to test by behavioral audiometry and show changes in rostral brainstem transmission in very young children with a history of OME.     

Iatrogenic tinnitus and kophosis treated by cochlear implant. Apropos of a case

A severe iatrogenic tinnitus has been successfully improved by cochlear implant, despite the hearing and intelligibility of the opposite ear were not profoundly impaired. This case report allows to discuss the eventual enlargement of the classic cochlear implant indications.     

Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli

We have previously shown that acute electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using charge-balanced biphasic current pulses presented continuously can lead to a prolonged decrement in auditory nerve excitability (Tykocinski et al., Hear. Res. 88 (1995), 124-142). This work also demonstrated a reduction in electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) amplitude decrement when using an otherwise equivalent pulse train with a 50% duty cycle. In the present study we have extended this work in order to compare the effects of electrical stimulation using both fixed amplitude electrical pulse trains and amplitude modulated (AM) pulse trains that more accurately model the dynamic stimulus paradigms used in cochlear implants. EABRs were recorded from guinea pigs following acute stimulation using AM trains of charge-balanced biphasic current pulses. The extent of stimulus-induced reductions in the EABR were compared with our previous results using either fixed amplitude continuous, or 50% duty cycle pulse trains operating at 0.34 microC/phase (2 mA, 170 micros/phase) at 400 or 1000 pulses/s (Tykocinski et al., Hear. Res. 88 (1995) 124-142). The AM pulse train, operating at the same rates, was based on a 1-s sequence of the most extensively activated electrode of a Nucleus Mini-22 cochlear implant using the SPEAK speech processing strategy exposed to 4-talker babble, and delivered the same total charge as the fixed amplitude 50% duty cycle pulse train. Two hours of continuous stimulation induced a significant, rate-dependent reduction in auditory nerve excitability, and showed only a slight post-stimulus recovery for monitoring periods of up to 6 hours. Following 2 or 4 h of stimulation using an otherwise equivalent pulse train with a 50% duty cycle or the AM pulse train, significantly less reduction in the EABR was observed, and recovery to pre-stimulus levels was generally rapid and complete. These differences in the extent of the recovery between the continuous waveform and both the 50% duty cycle and AM waveforms were statistically significant for both 400 and 1000 pulses/s stimuli. Consistent with our previous results, the stimulus changes observed using AM pulse trains were rate dependent, with higher rate stimuli evoking more extensive stimulus-induced changes. The present findings show that while stimulus-induced reductions in neural excitability are dependent on the extent of stimulus-induced neuronal activity, the use of an AM stimulus paradigm further reduces post-stimulus neural fatigue.