Ex-vivo gene therapy using cytokine-transduced tumor vaccines: molecular and clinical pharmacology

Whether the current generation of cytokine gene-transduced tumor vaccines will show clinical efficacy is under study. Fortunately, the large safety profile so far observed with gene-transduced tumor vaccines can allow outpatient testing in large populations of patients in the adjuvant therapy situation. This will allow large studies statistically powered to see potentially important adjuvant therapy effects in the range that are observed for tamoxifen in breast cancer. For example, the outpatient, adjuvant therapy safety context has been established in the use of GM-CSF gene-transduced autologous prostate cancer vaccines following radical prostatectomy. Similar adjuvant therapy clinical trial efforts are anticipated with allogeneic breast, colon, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer in addition to prostate, renal cell carcinoma, and melanoma. The reverse translation of early clinical data back to basic laboratory research also suggests the field of cytokine gene-transduced tumor vaccine research will remain vibrant. Efforts are currently being directed on optimizing DC activation with polycistronic constructs of cytokine genes, and overexpressing the most relevant tumor-associated peptides. As in the case of antineoplastic drug development, not all lead compounds will become approved drugs in medical oncology. Rigorous yet innovative clinical trial designs will be key to the accelerated identification of cytokine gene-transduced vaccines that improve survival in cancer patients.     

Active immunotherapy with allogeneic tumor cell vaccines: present status

This review will concentrate on allogeneic vaccines for melanoma The important principles of melanoma vaccine effectiveness are discussed in detail, followed by a review of the progress of several clinical trials investigating allogeneic vaccines. No therapeutic cancer vaccine has yet been approved for general use by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, much progress has been made in the field of vaccine immunotherapy, especially for the treatment of melanoma. Active immunotherapy with tumor vaccines is progressing rapidly as an emerging option for cancer therapy.     

Typhoid fever vaccines: a meta-analysis of studies on efficacy and toxicity

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the efficacy and toxicity of typhoid fever vaccines. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised efficacy trials and both randomised and non-randomised toxicity studies of the parenteral whole cell, oral Ty21a, and parenteral Vi vaccines. SUBJECTS: 1,866,951 subjects in 17 efficacy trials; 11,204 subjects in 20 toxicity studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pooled estimates of three year cumulative efficacy, year specific efficacy, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Three year cumulative efficacy was 73% (95% confidence interval 65% to 80%) for two doses of whole cell vaccines (based on seven trials); 51% (35% to 63%) for three doses of Ty21a vaccine (four trials); and 55% (30% to 71%) for one dose of Vi vaccine (one trial). For whole cell and Ty21a vaccines, regimens of fewer doses were less effective. Efficacy was shown to be significant for five years for whole cell vaccines, four years for Ty21a vaccine, and two years for Vi vaccine. Neither the age of vaccine recipient nor the incidence of typhoid fever in the control group (varying from 6 to 810 cases per 100,000 person years) affected the efficacy of the whole cell or Ty21a vaccines. After vaccination, fever occurred in 15.7% (11.5% to 21.2%) of whole cell vaccine recipients, 2.0% (0.7% to 5.3%) of Ty21a vaccine recipients, and 1.1% (0.1% to 12.3%) of Vi vaccine recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Whole cell vaccines are more effective than the Ty21a and Vi vaccines but are more frequently associated with adverse events. Whether the added efficacy of the whole cell vaccines outweighs their toxicity will depend on the setting in which vaccination is used.     

Reflections on the effectiveness of the new combined vaccines]

The combination vaccines are very useful to reduce the number of contacts required to immunize a child fully and to improve the vaccine coverage. Recently the new combinations between Haemophilus Influenzae vaccine (PRP-T) and pertussis vaccines in D-T-P (IVP) combined vaccines have suggested interferences with immunogenicity for PRP-T vaccines. The interference for pertussis antibodies is not significative. The depression of antiPRP antibodies is shown with the whole-cell pertussis vaccine, but the level of antibodies is related to a good protective efficacy. Inversely, when PRP-T vaccine is combined with acellular pertussis vaccines, the antibodies levels are lower, especially the number of children with a level higher than 1 mcg/ml. At the present time, these combinations between PRP-T vaccines and acellular pertussis vaccines are not recommended for primary immunization in infants in France. Such constations emphasize the necessity to perform wide comparative trials to test immunogenicity for all the next combinations between old and new vaccines. A decrease in immunogenicity of combination vaccines is acceptable as long as protective efficacy is preserved. It is possible that the growing number of new vaccines to combine will be limited to keep a clinical efficacy.     

Current status of melanoma vaccines

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is increasing worldwide faster than any other cancer and the American lifetime risk is estimated to reach 1 in 75 by the year 2000. Active specific immunotherapy with vaccines is evolving as a promising new modality in the treatment of malignant melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To present a concise and understandable summary of the key molecular and clinical concepts of melanoma vaccines currently under investigation, the history that led to their development, and their anticipated clinical response. METHODS: The recent advances in the field of melanoma immunobiology and the newest experiment vaccines are reviewed. RESULTS: There is no effective melanoma vaccine that successfully treats or prevents melanoma. However, their use has been associated with regression or delayed disease progression in some cases. The minority of patients who do have a major clinical response to vaccine therapy experience an improvement in survival. Even in those patients in whom melanoma vaccines cannot improve survival, the paucity of severe side effects has provided a quality of life superior to standard multiagent chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Melanoma vaccines are relatively safe immunotherapeutic modalities for the management of malignant melanoma. The clinical effectiveness of melanoma vaccines is unclear and adequately controlled studies need yet to be performed. Current melanoma vaccines manipulate antigen presentation networks and combine the best cellular and antibody antitumor immune response effective in mediating tumor protective immunity; these combination vaccines hold the most promise. The ideal melanoma vaccine will ultimately prevent melanoma.     

Adjuvant medical therapy for colorectal cancer

In the mid-1980s, trials of adjuvant therapy for colon cancer in the United States had a "no treatment" arm, which reflected the belief that effective adjuvant chemotherapy did not exist for patients with surgically resected disease at high risk for recurrence. However, with the observation in the early 1990s that postsurgical adjuvant 5-FU plus levamisole reduced tumor recurrence and ultimately increased overall survival in stage III colon cancer, the potential of effective adjuvant chemotherapy was realized. Questions about the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy, the specifics of chemotherapy schedule/drug selection, and its use in stage II colon cancer are beginning to be clarified in large, randomized adjuvant therapy trials. In rectal carcinomas, combined modality postoperative pelvic irradiation plus chemotherapy for stage II and III disease has been shown to reduce both local and systemic recurrences and to prolong survival compared with that in patients treated with local surgery and radiation. Again, large randomized trials are attempting to clarify both the optimal chemotherapeutic agents and schedules to be used and also whether preoperative combined modality therapy can improve the resectability rate, rate of sphincter preservation, and survival. Future trials will examine new agents shown to be effective in advanced disease as well as monoclonal antibodies, such as MoAb 17-1A, that may have selective activity in minimal disease. Improvement in overall survival remains the ultimate endpoint of future adjuvant therapy trials; however, trials will also critically examine toxicity, quality of life, pharmacoeconomics, and genetic and biologic correlates that may help select more appropriate candidates for adjuvant therapies.     

Bacterial adhesion to orthopedic implant polymers

Previous chapters have shown that there are a large number of therapeutic approaches under consideration for the gene therapy of cancer. Many of these have progressed into Phase I clinical trials. However, many of the early results are perceived to be disappointing in terms of low levels of gene transfer and systemic efficacy. In this concluding chapter, possible solutions to this state of unease are addressed, so that gene therapy of cancer can resume on its course to become a major contributor to clinical oncology in the years ahead.     

Bioactive glass fiber/polymeric composites bond to bone tissue

Cancer cells genetically modified to secrete immunoregulatory cytokines offer great promise for human cancer treatment as tumor vaccines. However, in preclinical animal studies, large established cancer burdens have appeared difficult to eradicate with such vaccines. For example, lethally-irradiated GM-CSF-secreting CT26 colon carcinoma cell vaccine therapy tends to cure only animals bearing 1 x 10(5) wild-type CT26 cells or less. For many human cancers, antineoplastic chemotherapy can often significantly reduce systemic cancer burdens. Unfortunately, for most advanced metastatic solid organ cancers, such as cancers of the breast, colon, and prostate, antineoplastic drug treatments generally fail to effect cancer cures. Treatment regimens combining genetically-modified cancer cell vaccine therapy and antineoplastic chemotherapy have the potential to increase advanced cancer cure rates if antineoplastic drugs and drug combinations that do not inhibit vaccine-induced immune responses can be identified. To assess the potential immunomodulatory properties of commonly-used antineoplastic drugs that might be used in combination with cancer vaccine treatments, we studied the effects of the drugs on antitumor immune responses manifest by animals receiving lethally-irradiated GM-CSF-secreting CT26 cell vaccines. Immunomodulatory properties of the antineoplastic drugs were evaluated i) by monitoring drug effects on the generation of tumor-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) in response to GM-CSF-secreting CT26 vaccine administration, ii) by determining drug effects on the resistance of vaccinated animals to subsequent challenge with lethal inoculac of CT26 cells, and iii) by evaluating combination drug and vaccine treatment efficacy against established CT26 tumors. Using this approach, doxorubicin was found to possess apparent immunostimulatory activities, depending on the dose and schedule of administration, while cyclophosphamide appeared immunosuppressive. The different immunomodulatory properties of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide may be clinically relevant: combination doxorubicin and vaccine treatment of established CT26 cancers increased cure rates over that achieved with either agent alone, while combination cyclophosphamide and vaccine treatment of animals carrying CT26 tumors was no better in curing the animals than drug treatment alone.     

HIV preventive vaccines. Progress to date

The major conceptual problem for HIV vaccine development has been the lack of information on immune responses known to correlate with protection against HIV infection in humans. In this regard, studies on the natural history of HIV infection and AIDS, especially of people with apparent resistance to HIV infection and of patients with HIV infection who have long term survival without disease progression, may provide important information for vaccine development. In addition, a major concern for the development of broadly effective vaccines has been the extensive genetic variability which is characteristic of HIV. In spite of these unknowns, the first generation of HIV candidate vaccines has been developed and evaluated. HIV candidate vaccines based on the subunit recombinant envelope concept (gp120 or gp160) have been shown to protect chimpanzees from HIV infection on challenge, and have now been evaluated in humans in phase I and phase II trials. These products are well tolerated, and capable of inducing neutralising antibodies, but not cytotoxic T lymphocytes. A second vaccine concept, currently in phase I trials, is based on live recombinant vectors, especially using poxvirus vectors followed by boosting with subunit recombinant envelope vaccines. This concept is theoretically very attractive because preliminary data suggest that these vaccines induce both humoral and cell-mediated immunity. However, no published information is available on the ability of live recombinant vector vaccines to protect chimpanzees from HIV infection. The next step in HIV vaccine development is to proceed carefully to expanded phase II and phase III trials to assess the protective efficacy of these candidate vaccines in humans. These trials will be extremely complex from the logistical, scientific and ethical points of view, and will require close collaboration between clinical, basic science and behavioural researchers, national and international organisations, and the pharmaceutical industry.     

Gene therapy for colon cancer

The enormous number of newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer that occur each year and the lack of agents that are highly effective for all patients underscore the need for novel approaches to combating the disease. Gene therapy as a developing treatment modality is already well established, with a number of trials ongoing and a vast range of other approaches being assessed in animal and cell culture experiments. In this brief review, we have discussed five gene therapy trials in colon carcinoma that are ongoing or in the approval process in the United States. The gene therapy approaches being employed can be divided into three major categories: (1) enzyme/prodrug systems (HSVtk/ganciclovir; CD/5-fluorocytosine); (2) tumor suppressor gene replacement therapy with wild-type p53; and (3) immune-gene therapy which is based on cytokine or tumor antigen expression to induce tumor immunity (e.g., CEA). Replication-deficient recombinant adenoviral vectors are predominantly used for colon cancer gene therapy, because they can be produced at high titer and they readily infect a number of different cell types. One trial uses polynucleotide therapy for antitumor immunization with intramuscular injection. All of these studies are phase I trials, principally designed to evaluate safety, but they will also provide data on gene delivery. Some trials may provide some insight into potential therapeutic effects. We have alluded to some of the concerns on toxicity related to the use of adenovirus, risks and side effects from transgenes, lack of tumor-specificity of transgene expression, and potential problems with efficient gene delivery to solid tumors. The clinical trials, however, will provide insight that will inform design of future studies with respect to dose, form, and frequency of administration, as well as to the value of biologic and clinical endpoints. The molecular analysis of the fundamental basis of colon cancer has moved at a remarkable pace and that progress seems set to continue. Thus, the basic foundations for gene therapy are undoubtedly in place: a clinical need; growing understanding of basic tumor biology; and ever-improving delivery systems. The field is at a very early stage in its evolution, and one concern is that the considerable hurdles that must be overcome are seen as examples of the failure of cancer gene therapy; however, we believe these challenges will be overcome. The authors also believe that colon cancer gene therapy is likely to take new directions, such as use as adjuvant to radical surgery, rather than attempts to treat end-stage disease when the liver is replaced by metastases. Other new directions might include prophylactic gene-based immunization against a panel of well-characterized tumor antigens, at least for persons shown to be at high risk of colon cancer because of genetic or other predisposition. A marriage between gene therapy approaches and conventional anticancer treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy also seems likely. There is already evidence of this move with demonstration of synergism between p53 replacement and radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It is also likely that therapies will be developed that combine elements from the cancer gene therapies discussed previously, namely, suicide gene transfer, immune modulation, and modulation of defective cancer genes. Perhaps one of the main concerns is not that researchers in cancer gene therapy want to walk before they can run, but that the public and government agencies believe they can. The next 10 years will be an interesting time in the development of novel treatments against colon cancer.     

Bone marrow-generated dendritic cells pulsed with tumor extracts or tumor RNA induce antitumor immunity against central nervous system tumors

Recent studies have shown that the brain is not a barrier to successful active immunotherapy that uses gene-modified autologous tumor cell vaccines. In this study, we compared the efficacy of two types of vaccines for the treatment of tumors within the central nervous system (CNS): dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccines pulsed with either tumor extract or tumor RNA, and cytokine gene-modified tumor vaccines. Using the B16/F10 murine melanoma (B16) as a model for CNS tumor, we show that vaccination with bone marrow-generated DCs, pulsed with either B16 cell extract or B16 total RNA, can induce specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes against B16 tumor cells. Both types of DC vaccines were able to protect animals from tumors located in the CNS. DC-based vaccines also led to prolonged survival in mice with tumors placed before the initiation of vaccine therapy. The DC-based vaccines were at least as effective, if not more so, as vaccines containing B16 tumor cells in which the granulocytic macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene had been modified. These data support the use of DC-based vaccines for the treatment of patients with CNS tumors.     

Cell fate and morphogenetic movement in the late mouse primitive streak

Metastatic breast cancer remains incurable by conventional means and is the second leading cause of all cancer deaths in women in the United States. Laboratory and clinical studies have shown chemotherapy dose intensity may be important in breast cancer therapy, and therefore clinical trials have been investigating high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell rescue (ASCR) for the past decade. Initial Phase I trials in heavily pretreated patients demonstrated good response rates but short survival times. The next generation of trials used HDC as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer and showed improved results. Most recently, patients receive HDC after "induction" chemotherapy to minimize tumor burden prior to HDC. Results from these most recent trials are encouraging, with complete remissions (CR) achievable in at least half of patients and long-term survivors noted. An ongoing randomized trial of HDC versus conventional chemotherapy should answer whether HDC is superior to conventional chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Based on encouraging data from a preliminary trial, two ongoing randomized trials are comparing HDC versus conventional chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer. Technological improvements, better supportive care and experience have all contributed to decrease the morbidity and mortality of this procedure. Additionally, hospitalizations have become shorter and costs may be decreasing. This review will discuss the issues pertinent to this modality in the past and present, including chemotherapy regimens, stem cell technology and related issues, outcomes, ongoing trials and future directions for consideration.     

Experimental vaccine strategies for cancer immunotherapy

Recently, cancer immunotherapy has emerged as a therapeutic option for the management of cancer patients. This is based on the fact that our immune system, once activated, is capable of developing specific immunity against neoplastic but not normal cells. Increasing evidence suggests that cell-mediated immunity, particularly T-cell-mediated immunity, is important for the control of tumor cells. Several experimental vaccine strategies have been developed to enhance cell-mediated immunity against tumors. Some of these tumor vaccines have generated promising results in murine tumor systems. In addition, several phase I/II clinical trials using these vaccine strategies have shown extremely encouraging results in patients. In this review, we will discuss many of these promising cancer vaccine strategies. We will pay particular attention to the strategies employing dendritic cells, the central player for tumor vaccine development.     

Cancer gene therapy using tumor cells infected with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing GM-CSF

The efficacy of a recombinant vaccinia virus (rvv-mGM-CSF) expressing murine granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for use in cancer gene therapy was evaluated. C57BL/6 mice with established B16-F10 melanoma were treated by s.c. injection of irradiated B16 cells infected with two different recombinant vaccinia virus (rvv) constructs. Mice treated with rvv-mGM-CSF vaccine survived longer (p < 0.05), were free of palpable tumors (> 4 mm) longer (p < 0.02), and had smaller mean tumor volumes (p < 0.005) compared to those treated with irradiated B16 cells infected with a control rvv (rvv-lacZ) expressing Escherichia coli beta-galactosidase or irradiated uninfected B16 cells. The vaccine appeared to be B16 tumor cell specific, because there was no therapeutic effect when heterologous but syngeneic (H-2b) colon adenocarcinoma cells, MC-38 infected with rvv-mGM-CSF were used as vaccine. In this model, rvv expressing interleukin-2 (IL-2) was ineffective. In addition, experimental lung metastasis of B16 tumor cells was significantly inhibited by rvv-mGM-CSF vaccine compared to several control vaccines when the vaccine was applied either by i.p. route (p < 0.006) or by s.c. injection (p < 0.0008). B16 cells expressing mGM-CSF after infection with rvv-mGM-CSF or transduction with a retroviral vector, were equally effective (p > 0.14) as vaccines against lung metastasis. Inhibition of metastasis was also B16 tumor cell specific. These data suggest that this approach of cancer gene therapy has a potential for use in cancer patients.     

Recent progress in live influenza vaccine development]

As live influenza vaccine, cold-adapted influenza virus vaccines (ca vaccine) have been extensively investigated in both the U.S and Russia. In Russia it has been licensed since 1988 and it is going to be licensed in the U.S. within a year or two. In general, the ca vaccine is more effective in seronegative population than the inactivated vaccine. In seropositive adult population, both are equally effective. In the elderly, inactivated vaccine is better than the live vaccine. In Japan, clinical trials were also conducted with the American ca vaccines. Although the efficacy was confirmed in limited locations, the vaccine could not be evaluated from the point of license approval because big epidemic did not occur during the studies.     

Toward a human papillomavirus vaccine

Much progress has been made over the past 10 years with regard to development of a vaccine active against HPV. Successful protection has been achieved in animal models using species-specific papillomaviruses; however, HPV diversity may delay the development of successful HPV vaccines, especially those designed as therapeutic vaccines for the treatment of HPV-induced carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia of the cervix. Difficulties arise with regard to assessment of efficacy of potential vaccines. The impetus for long-term studies on vaccine efficacy will initially stem from in vitro evidence of responsiveness to the vaccine. The time when a vaccine will have an impact on the prevalence of high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer is still some way off.     

Molecular size characterization of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines

Current vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) consist of capsular polysaccharide, polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP), chemically conjugated to a carrier protein. The stability of the conjugate is essential for vaccine efficacy, as the target population for this vaccine includes infants, who do not mount an immune response to free polysaccharide vaccines. A method has been developed for determining structural stability and batch-to-batch consistency of Hib vaccines by the application of fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC). This FPLC method is fast, reproducible, and can be used to evaluate single human doses of Hib vaccines. We have shown that the FPLC elution profiles provide a suitable indicator of vaccine stability under normal and degradative conditions. The method may also be applicable to other conjugate vaccines such as meningococcal and pneumococcal protein-polysaccharide conjugates.     

Bioactivity of autologous irradiated renal cell carcinoma vaccines generated by ex vivo granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene transfer

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) gene-transduced, irradiated tumor vaccines induce potent, T-cell-mediated antitumor immune responses in preclinical models. We report the initial results of a Phase I trial evaluating this strategy for safety and the induction of immune responses in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients were treated in a randomized, double-blind dose-escalation study with equivalent doses of autologous, irradiated RCC vaccine cells with or without ex vivo human GM-CSF gene transfer. The replication-defective retroviral vector MFG was used for GM-CSF gene transfer. No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered in 16 fully evaluable patients. GM-CSF gene-transduced vaccines were equivalent in toxicity to nontransduced vaccines up to the feasible limits of autologous tumor vaccine yield. No evidence of autoimmune disease was observed. Biopsies of intradermal sites of injection with GM-CSF gene-transduced vaccines contained distinctive macrophage, dendritic cell, eosinophil, neutrophil, and T-cell infiltrates similar to those observed in preclinical models of efficacy. Histological analysis of delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in patients vaccinated with GM-CSF-transduced vaccines demonstrated an intense eosinophil infiltrate that was not observed in patients who received nontransduced vaccines. An objective partial response was observed in a patient treated with GM-CSF gene-transduced vaccine who displayed the largest delayed-type hypersensitivity conversion. No replication-competent retrovirus was detected in vaccinated patients. This Phase I study demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and bioactivity of an autologous GM-CSF gene-transduced tumor vaccine for RCC patients.     

Papillomaviruses and cervical cancer: pathogenesis and vaccine development

A subset of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) has been implicated as the principal etiologic agents of cervical cancer. Cervical cancers consistently retain and express two of the viral genes, E6 and E7. Although infection with HPV seems to be necessary, other factors, such as cellular immune function, play an important role in determining whether cervical infection will regress, persist, or progress to cancer. The close relationship between viral infection and cancer makes HPV an attractive target for prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. Candidate vaccines have been shown to have efficacy in animal models, and human clinical trials are planned or in progress.     

Structural basis for inhibition of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone by the antitumor antibiotics radicicol and geldanamycin

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer recurrence, evidenced by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy, is an increasingly prevalent clinical problem in need of new treatment options. Preclinical studies have suggested that for tumors in general, settings of minimal cancer volume may be uniquely suitable for recombinant vaccine therapy targeting tumor-associated antigens. A clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and biologic effects of vaccinia-PSA (PROSTVAC) administered to subjects with postprostatectomy recurrence of prostate cancer and to assess the feasibility of interrupted androgen deprivation as a tool for modulating expression of the vaccine target antigen, as well as detecting vaccine bioactivity in vivo. METHODS: A limited Phase I clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and biologic effects of vaccinia-PSA administered in 6 patients with androgen-modulated recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. End points included toxicity, serum PSA rise related to serum testosterone restoration, and immunologic effects measured by Western blot analysis for anti-PSA antibody induction. RESULTS: Toxicity was minimal, and dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Noteworthy variability in time required for testosterone restoration (after interruption of androgen deprivation therapy) was observed. One subject showed continued undetectable serum PSA (less than 0.2 ng/mL) for over 8 months after testosterone restoration, an interval longer than those reported in previous androgen deprivation interruption studies. Primary anti-PSA IgG antibody activity was induced after vaccinia-PSA immunization in 1 subject, although such antibodies were detectable in several subjects at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Interrupted androgen deprivation may be a useful tool for modulating prostate cancer bioactivity in clinical trials developing novel biologic therapies. Immune responses against PSA may be present among some patients with prostate cancer at baseline and may be induced in others through vaccinia-PSA immunization.