Evaluation of written reinforcements used in counseling cardiovascular patients

The acceptance and effectiveness of medication cards and booklets for cardiovascular patients were evaluated. Approximately one month after discharge counseling which included the written reinforcements, 22 out of 50 patients discharged from cardiothoracic surgery and cardiovascular medicine units were questioned to assess patient usage of the medication cards/booklets and patient knowledge of their particular drugs. All patients except one indicated that they had read the material after leaving the hospital, and many had read it more than once. The effectiveness of the material was found to be only partially acceptable when general and specific medical questions were asked. The names and uses of most of the drugs taken by the patients were identified correctly.     

Incremental prognostic value of adenosine stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and impact on subsequent management in patients with or suspected of having myocardial ischemia

We examined 1,159 consecutive patients who underwent adenosine stress dual isotope single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and had follow-up performed at a mean of 27.5 +/- 9.1 months (94% complete) for hard events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction) and referral to cardiac catheterization after nuclear testing. During follow-up, 120 hard events occurred (11.0% hard event rate; 72 cardiac deaths [6.7% cardiac death rate] and 57 myocardial infarctions [5.3% myocardial infarction rate]). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that nuclear testing added incremental value after adjusting for clinical and historical variables (global chi-square increased 13 to 98 for cardiac death as the end point, global chi-square increased 19 to 105 for hard events as the end point; p <0.0001 for both). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that after clinical risk stratification of the patient population, the results of nuclear testing were further able to significantly stratify both low- and intermediate- to high-risk patients. Patients with both normal and mildly abnormal scans were at low risk of cardiac death (<1% cardiac death per year of follow-up) and the risk of events increased significantly with worsening scan result. Multivariable analysis revealed that the only predictor of referral to catheterization was the extent and severity of reversible defect present on the scan. Referral rates to early catheterization were very low in patients with normal scans and increased significantly as a function of worsening scan results. In patients who underwent myocardial perfusion SPECT using adenosine stress, the results of nuclear testing yielded incremental prognostic information and clinically relevant risk stratification. Referring physicians predominantly utilized nuclear information when referring patients to catheterization after nuclear testing and do so at rates comparable with those after exercise SPECT despite the higher risk of events in patients undergoing pharmacologic stress.     

Influence of gender, race, and education on patient preferences and receipt of cardiac catheterizations among coronary care unit patients

The extent to which a preference for less aggressive care explains the lower rate of invasive cardiac services for women and African-Americans is unknown. A prospective observational study of 272 patients admitted to the coronary care unit was conducted at a tertiary referral teaching hospital and a community teaching hospital. In stepwise multivariate analysis, having less than a college education, poor cardiac function, not having undergone a previous cardiac catheterization, being a patient in a nonreferral community hospital, and current smoking were positively associated with a patient's stating that he or she would disagree with a physician's recommendation for a cardiac catheterization. The step-wise multivariate model with cardiac catheterization as the dependent variable indicated that being a patient in a referral medical center, patient willingness to accept a physician's recommendation for a cardiac catheterization, severe heart disease, and having attended high school were predictive. Women did not differ from men in their preference for or receipt of cardiac catheterization. Patients in the coronary care unit with lower levels of education were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization. This association was only partly explained by less educated patients' being less willing to accept a physician's recommendation to undergo cardiac catheterization.     

The knowledge nurses need to educate patients about stroke

Ensuring that patients and clients receive the information they need and/or want, in a form that is comprehensible, is a major part of the nurse's role. This role has expanded in recent years, and many wards and units have prepared information booklets that answer some of the more frequently asked questions about particular conditions. However, many of these cannot be used outside a small area, because the information contained is too specific. This article launches a new series presenting up-to-date material that complements existing information booklets and packs or which may be used to start them. An example is given, using cerebrovascular accident, to demonstrate the format.     

Projected cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction under varying assumptions about effectiveness, existing facilities and staffing and volume of services. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has reduced mortality in some studies, but its actual effectiveness may vary, and most U.S. hospitals do not have cardiac catheterization laboratories. Projections of cost-effectiveness in various settings are needed for decisions about adoption. METHODS: We created a decision analytic model to compare three policies: primary angioplasty, intravenous thrombolysis and no intervention. Probabilities of health outcomes were taken from randomized trials (base case efficacy assumptions) and community-based studies (effectiveness assumptions). The base case analysis assumed that a hospital with an existing laboratory with night/weekend staffing coverage admitted 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually. In alternative scenarios, a new laboratory was built, and its capacity for elective procedures was either 1) needed or 2) redundant with existing laboratories. RESULTS: Under base case efficacy assumptions, primary angioplasty resulted in cost savings compared with thrombolysis and had a cost of $12,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved compared with no intervention. In sensitivity analyses, when there was an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory at a hospital with > or = 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually, primary angioplasty had a cost of < $30,000/QALY saved under a wide range of assumptions. However, the cost/QALY saved increased sharply under effectiveness assumptions when the hospital had < 150 patients with a myocardial infarction annually or when a redundant laboratory was built. CONCLUSIONS: At hospitals with an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory, primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction would be cost-effective relative to other medical interventions under a wide range of assumptions. The procedure's relative cost-ineffectiveness at low volumes or redundant laboratories supports regionalization of cardiac services in urban areas. However, approaches to overcoming competitive barriers and close monitoring of outcomes and costs will be needed.     

Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials.

Effective management of chronic diseases (e.g., diabetes) can depend on the extent to which patients can learn and remember disease-relevant information. In two experiments, we explored a technique motivated by theories of self-regulated learning for improving people's learning of information relevant to managing a chronic disease. Materials were passages from patient education booklets on diabetes from NIDDK. Session 1 included an initial study trial, Session 2 included self-regulated restudy, and Session 3 included a final memory test. The key manipulation concerned the kind of support provided for self-regulated learning during Session 2. In Experiment 1, participants either were prompted to self-test and then evaluate their learning before selecting passages to restudy, were shown the prompt questions but did not overtly self-test or evaluate learning prior to selecting passages, or were not shown any prompts and were simply given the menu for selecting passages to restudy. Participants who self-tested and evaluated learning during Session 2 had a small but significant advantage over the other groups on the final test. Secondary analyses provided evidence that the performance advantage may have been modest because of inaccurate monitoring. Experiment 2 included a group who also self-tested but who evaluated their learning using idea-unit judgments (i.e., by checking their responses against a list of key ideas from the correct response). Participants who self-tested and made idea-unit judgments exhibited a sizable advantage on final test performance. Secondary analyses indicated that the performance advantage was attributable in part to more accurate monitoring and more effective self-regulated learning. An important practical implication is that learning of patient education materials can be enhanced by including appropriate support for learners' self-regulatory processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of heavy metals and storage time on two types of forest litter: basal respiration rate and exchangeable metals

BACKGROUND: Techniques are needed to assess anesthesiologists' performance when responding to critical events. Patient simulators allow presentation of similar crisis situations to different clinicians. This study evaluated ratings of performance, and the interrater variability of the ratings, made by multiple independent observers viewing videotapes of simulated crises. METHODS: Raters scored the videotapes of 14 different teams that were managing two scenarios: malignant hyperthermia (MH) and cardiac arrest. Technical performance and crisis management behaviors were rated. Technical ratings could range from 0.0 to 1.0 based on scenario-specific checklists of appropriate actions. Ratings of 12 crisis management behaviors were made using a five-point ordinal scale. Several statistical assessments of interrater variability were applied. RESULTS: Technical ratings were high for most teams in both scenarios (0.78 +/- 0.08 for MH, 0.83 +/- 0.06 for cardiac arrest). Ratings of crisis management behavior varied, with some teams rated as minimally acceptable or poor (28% for MH, 14% for cardiac arrest). The agreement between raters was fair to excellent, depending on the item rated and the statistical test used. CONCLUSIONS: Both technical and behavioral performance can be assessed from videotapes of simulations. The behavioral rating system can be improved; one particular difficulty was aggregating a single rating for a behavior that fluctuated over time. These performance assessment tools might be useful for educational research or for tracking a resident's progress. The rating system needs more refinement before it can be used to assess clinical competence for residency graduation or board certification.     

Admission to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities :impact on long-term costs and outcomes

BACKGROUND: Admission to a hospital with a capability for cardiac procedures is associated with a higher likelihood of referral for a cardiac procedure but not with a better short-term clinical outcome. Whether there are differences in long-term mortality and resource consumption is not clear. We sought to determine whether elderly Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities have lower long-term hospital costs and better outcomes than patients admitted to hospitals without such facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot in Connecticut, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files. The study sample included 2521 patients with acute myocardial infarction covered by Medicare from 1992 to 1993. The cardiac catheterization rate was higher in the hospitals with facilities (38.6% versus 26.9%; P<0.001), but the revascularization rate was similar (20.5% versus 19.5%) during the initial episode of care and at 3 years (29.7% versus 29.7%). Mortality rates were similar for patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals at 30 days (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.42) and at 3 years (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26). The adjusted readmission rates were significantly lower among patients admitted to hospitals with cardiac catheterization facilities (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94). However, the overall mean days in the hospital for the 3 years after admission was 25.9 for patients admitted to hospitals with facilities and 24.6 for the other patients (P=0.234). Adjusting for baseline patient characteristics, there was no significant difference in the 3-year costs between patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: With higher rates of cardiac catheterization and lower readmission rates, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities did not have significantly different hospital costs compared with patients admitted to hospitals without these facilities. There was also no significant difference in short- or long-term mortality rates.     

Pre- and post-operative management of cesarean section in a parturient with severe preeclampsia accompanied by hyperdynamic state

A 37-year-old parturient with severe preeclampsia accompanied by pulmonary edema underwent emergency cesarean section. Pulmonary artery (PA) catheter inserted while the patient was awake revealed hyperdynamic state with increased cardiac index and preload, and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia were provided with a satisfactory outcome. Monitoring of PA pressure and cardiac index was continued postoperatively in ICU for fluid management. We conclude that preoperative PA catheterization provides useful hemodynamic information in severe preeclamptic patients associated with persistent oliguria, pulmonary edema and hyperdynamic state.     

The effect of early ambulation on hematoma formation and vascular complications following 7 French diagnostic cardiac catheterization

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of early ambulation 3 to 4 h after diagnostic 7 French cardiac catheterization. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind assignment to one of 3, 4 or 6 h ambulation postcardiac catheterization groups. SETTING: Tertiary care community hospital in an urban region. PATIENTS: Eight hundred and seventy-four consecutive inpatients and out-patients presenting for routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization. INTERVENTION: Hematoma formation and other vascular complications recorded at the time of discharge and 24 h later. MAIN RESULTS: No significant difference in hematoma formation rates was noted among patients mobilized at 3 h (3.6%), 4 h (4.8%) or 6 h (3.2%). Late hematoma formation occurred in 2.3% of patients. Other vascular complications were very rare. Reported rates of hematoma formation varied significantly (P < 0.05) among physicians, ranging from 0.9% to 8.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Early ambulation of patients 3 to 4 h after routine diagnostic 7 French cardiac catheterization is both safe and feasible. These findings could result in more efficient recovery bed utilization, reduced nursing costs and improved patient compliance with bed rest.     

Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization

Measurements of coronary flow reserve, once used only for research, have gained wide acceptance as an additional diagnostic approach in the decision-making process of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions. Apart from the noninvasive determination of coronary flow reserve, intracoronary Doppler flow wires have facilitated decision making in the catheterization laboratory. Different techniques, unstandardized procedures, and data from uncomparable patient populations have remained a confounding factor. This review examines current concepts of coronary flow reserve as well as methodologic considerations and pitfalls. Applications of coronary flow reserve for periinterventional assessment are evaluated on the background of practical guidance. According to a detailed examination of arterial structure and function, a normal coronary flow reserve exceeds a value of 3.0. Values below 3.0 suggest involvement of microvascular disease caused by functional or structural alterations. The influences of various factors such as age, hemodynamics, hypercholesterolemia, hypertrophy, hypertension, syndrome X, and coronary artery disease are discussed in relation to the effect on coronary flow reserve. From available information, measurements of coronary flow reserve are an adjunct to current interventional technology to optimize individual patient care. Further efforts should be undertaken to incorporate these new methods into our routine clinical decision making.     

Long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented the strong association between availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and increased use of coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although these studies have shown little influence of the availability of catheterization labs on hospital mortality, no long-term follow-up has been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a cohort of 12,331 AMI patients admitted to 19 Seattle area hospitals, we compared long-term outcome in 7985 patients admitted to hospitals with and 4346 patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization labs. During the index hospitalization, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (67.1% versus 39.3%, P<.0001), coronary angioplasty (32.5% versus 13.2%, P<.0001), or coronary bypass surgery (12.5% versus 9.5%, P<.0001). At 3-year follow-up, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization labs were more likely to undergo postdischarge angiography (19.2% versus 15.2%, P=.0001) and coronary angioplasty (11.6% versus 8.2%, P<.0001). This was associated with approximately $2500.00 per patient in higher cumulative costs. Despite this higher rate of procedure use, there was no association between admission to a hospital with on-site catheterization facilities and lower long-term mortality (multivariate hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.1., the hazard being associated with admission to hospitals with on-site catheterization facilities). CONCLUSIONS: In an urban area with unconstrained patient transfer mechanisms and high overall cardiac procedure use rates, AMI patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization facilities were managed with fewer procedures during hospitalization and follow-up. This more conservative treatment approach was not associated with any observed increase in long-term mortality.     

The Charles Bonnet syndrome: a review

OBJECTIVES: To discuss the advantages of different methods of determining the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, to evaluate the basis for the assumption that right heart catheterization is effective, and to consider how right heart catheterization may fail to improve outcomes in some circumstances. DATA SOURCE: Published English language literature on right heart catheterization and patient outcomes. DISCUSSION: We recently reported an association between the use of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients and increased risk of death. This finding is troubling and warrants future study. In this article I address the role of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the evaluation of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. I discuss the basis in the published literature for assuming that right heart catheterization improves outcomes. Finally I present a variety of problems with right heart catheterization which might allow this procedure, which logically should help patients, to fail to achieve a beneficial effect for some patients. CONCLUSION: We must do appropriate prospective studies to determine who benefits from right heart catheterization and who does not. We owe our patients nothing less.     

Mechanism for improved cardiac performance with arteriolar dilators in aortic insufficiency

To determine how arteriolar dilation improves cardiac performance in aortic insufficiency, we evaluated the acute effects of hydralazine in 10 patients with chronic severe aortic insufficiency. Control measurements of intracardiac and intravascular pressures, cardiac output and left ventricular volumes were obtained at cardiac catheterization. Hydralazine, 0.3 mg/kg i.v. (maximal dose 20 mg), was administered and all measurements were repeated 30 minutes later. A reduction in systemic vascular resistance from 1264 to 710 dyn-sec-cm-5 was associated with significant increases in forward cardiac index (2.9 to 5.1 l/min/m2) and stroke volume index (37 to 55 ml/m2). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was reduced from 19 to 12 mm Hg. There was a significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (88 to 83 mm Hg) and a significant increase in heart rate (81 to 94 beats/min). Regurgitant stroke volume was reduced by more than 10 ml/m2 in seven patients and for the group was significantly reduced, from 65 to 53 ml/m2. Regurgitant fraction was reduced in all patients; the overall reduction from 0.64 to 0.48 was highly significant. Ejection fraction increased more than 0.10 in four patients, by 0.08 in an additional patient and for the group increased significantly from 0.50 to 0.57. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by more than 25 ml/m2 in four patients, by 19 ml/m2 in an additional patient and was decreased significantly, from 208 to 190 ml/m2, for the group. Arteriolar dilators improve cardiac performance in aortic insufficiency by reducing the amount of aortic regurgitation and, in some patients, by substantially improving systolic pump fraction. These data suggest a role for arteriolar dilators in the management of selected patients with aortic insufficiency.     

The use of ungating with the Medstone lithotriptor

PURPOSE: Ungating using the Medstone* lithotriptor by 200 urologists was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 1994, 3,288 patients were treated by 200 urologists at 46 sites in 6 upper midwest states using 5 fixed and 3 mobile Medstone lithotriptors. Ungating was used with 58 treatments in 57 asymptomatic patients (1.8%) due to irregular cardiac rhythm in 48 caused by a bundle branch block (11), atrial fibrillation (10), slow heart rate (6) and irregular cardiac complex (21); all 48 cases were clinically insignificant, and because of urologist choice in 9 with normal cardiac rhythm (10 treatments). The cardiac simulator used for ungated lithotripsy was set at 85 shocks per minute for irregular cardiac rhythm and at 120 shocks per minute for elective use. RESULTS: The 48 treatments in patients with clinically insignificant irregular cardiac rhythm (average age 66.4 years) were performed during an average of 41 minutes of shock time. One patient had clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia that resolved with gating. The 10 elective treatments were performed during an average of 34 minutes of shock time in patients an average of 60.4 years old. The 3,231 gated treatments were performed during an average of 40 minutes of shock time in patients an average of 51 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Ungating was safe and effective in allowing patients with an irregular cardiac rhythm to be treated with the same shock time as gated cases (normal cardiac rhythm).     

Utilization of transcutaneous anesthetics during heart catheterization

OBJECTIVES: Assess the efficacy of an anesthetic cream for cardiac catheterization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Percutaneous anesthesia was studied in a series of 100 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. The anesthesia was composed with an eutetic mixture of local anesthetics and applied precisely over the puncture area in a randomized controlled study. After admission, patients were randomized into two groups: 50 patients received lidocaine infiltration and 50 patients received associated cream and infiltration. Percutaneous anesthesia was to be applied 2 hours before entering the operating room. RESULTS: No complication developed with this cream combined with lidocaine infiltration. Serum concentration indicated very low levels which were very well tolerated. Patient comfort improved with the anesthetic cream-lidocaine infiltration association. CONCLUSION: The use of an anesthetic cream is safe and effective, especially combined with lidocaine infiltration during cardiac catheterization. Cost is high and the association might be reserved for special indications (obesity, children).     

Expression of CD1a monocytes cultured with supernatants from periodontally diseased gingival epithelial cells

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated the role of color Doppler US-guided compression in the non-invasive treatment of femoral artery pseudoaneurysms after cardiac catheterization, including 22 PTCA procedures. The diagnosis of 32 pseudoaneurysms in 32 patients was accomplished by detection of the typical US-Doppler pattern consisting of the swirling color Doppler flow and the "to and fro" pulsed Doppler waveform at a mean 3.6 days (1 to 14) after the cardiac catheterization. Thirteen patients had multiple cavity pseudoaneurysms (2 to 4). All the patients immediately underwent compression therapy. RESULTS: Treatment was successful in 42/49 cavities (86%) and 25/32 patients (78%), usually after 1 to 3 compression cycles of 6 to 8 minutes duration. Only one recurrence was noted at the 24 hour US-Doppler follow-up. In all cases, pain relief during compression was an excellent clinical sign of hemostatic plug formation and conversion from pseudoaneurysm to simple hematoma. Failures occurred among patients under high dose anticoagulants in spite of 4 to 10 compression cycles. COMMENTARY: In conclusion, color Doppler US-guided compression of post-cardiac catheterization pseudoaneurysms should be the first line therapeutic modality, even in cases of multiple cavities and among patients under effective anticoagulation therapy.     

Positioning post-outpatient cardiac catheterization

The optimal positioning post-outpatient cardiac catheterization is a largely unexplored area of research. Traditionally, patients have been placed supine, with the head of the bed (HOB) flat. This study sought to explore the influence of three different post-procedure positions on the incidence of complications and patient perceptions of satisfaction. Sixty-nine patients were randomized into three groups immediately after hemostasis of the arterial puncture site was achieved. Group 1 patients were placed supine with the HOB flat. Group 2 patients were placed on their sides, with the affected extremity straight. Group 3 patients were placed on their backs, with the HOB at 15-30 degrees. Endpoints included the presence of any complication (bleeding, hematoma formation or expansion, back pain and urinary retention) and patient comfort and satisfaction with the randomized position. Patients were asked prior to discharge to select the position they would have preferred post-procedure. Selection of an alternative position was felt to indicate dissatisfaction with the randomized position. Ten patients in Group 1, and nine patients in Group 2 and Group 3 experienced a complication (X2 = 3.682, df = 1, p = 0.05). Eighty-five percent of Group 1 patients selected an alternative position vs. 24% of those patients in Group 2 and Group 3 (X2 = 27.6, df = 1, p < .001). Conclusion: varying patient position post-outpatient cardiac catheterization is at least as safe as the traditional supine position and is more comfortable for patients.     

Peripheral arterial complications after heart catheterization

After diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, local vascular complications at the arterial entry site must be expected. With respect to the method applied for catheterization and the puncture site, the type of complications may vary. With transfemoral approach a large variety of vascular complications have to be feared, mostly in the form of bleeding complications and hematomas, arterial dissections or occlusions, pseudoaneurysms and AV-fistulas. Each of these complications may have the potential for serious morbidity. When cardiac catheterization is performed via the arteries of the arm (either in the classical Sones technique by arterial cutdown to the brachial artery or by direct puncture of the brachial or radial artery) vascular occlusions will mostly occur as local vascular complications. These occlusions can often be managed conservatively or by a surgical procedure. The incidence of a vascular complication is mainly dependent on patient-related (sex, age, height, weight, arterial hypertension, diabetes, presence of peripheral vascular disease and compliance of the patient after withdrawal of the sheath) and procedure-related (arterial access site, diagnostic or interventional study, sheath size, periprocedural anticoagulation, duration of intra-arterial sheath placement, faulty puncture technique, operator skill) factors. In addition, the definition of a complication, the publication year of a certain study and the technique used for identification of complications seem to play a role for the reported incidence of peripheral vascular complications after cardiac catheterization. Currently, incidences of 0.1 to 2% for significant local vascular complications after diagnostic transfemoral catheterization are reported, after interventional transfemoral treatment 0.5 to 5% and after complex procedures using large sheath sizes with periprocedural anticoagulation (directional atherectomy, IABP, left-heart assist, valvuloplasty) up to 14%. Following transbrachial and transradial catheterization, local vascular complications at the entry site amount to 1 to 3% after diagnostic and 1 to 5% after interventional procedures. Local vascular complications may be diminished by a cautious and sensitive puncture technique with additional care in patients at higher risk for vascular complications (females, prediagnosed peripheral vascular disease, mandatory anticoagulation, necessity for large sheaths). By using smaller sized catheters and an adequate, defensive anticoagulation regimen, the rate of arterial access site complications may be reduced. Proper methods for achievement of hemostasis as well as a close and careful observation after sheath withdrawal are required.     

Variation in utilization of cardiac procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system: effect of race

OBJECTIVES: Utilization rates for cardiac catheterization and cardiac surgery in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system were studied to determine whether racial differences existed in a delivery plan in which access is not determined by patient finances. BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated significant differences in utilization of cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic resources by white and black patients. Reasons for the reduced utilization by black patients include socioeconomic, biologic and sociocultural effects. METHODS: Computerized discharge records of 30,300 patients with coronary artery disease and 1,335 patients with valvular heart disease who were discharged from any of 172 VA Medical Centers between October 1, 1990 and September 30, 1991 were studied. RESULTS: For patients with coronary artery disease, utilization rates of cardiac catheterization were significantly greater for white patients (503.4 procedures/1,000 patients) than for black patients (433.2/1,000 patients), with a relative odds ratio of 1.33. Rates for surgery (179.0 vs. 124.5/1,000 patients) were also greater for whites than for blacks, with a relative odds ratio of 1.53. For the subset with valve disease, the catheterization rate was significantly greater for whites than for blacks (575.4 vs. 432.6 procedures/1,000 patients), with a relative odds ratio of 1.78. Surgical rates were not significantly different (423.8 vs. 354.6 operations/1,000 patients). Racial differences for both catheterization and surgery varied widely as a function of geographic region and the level of complexity of the local VA facility. CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in resource utilization exist in a health care system in which economic influences are minimized. The pattern of these differences depends on numerous variables and suggests both biologic and sociocultural factors as underlying causes.