Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens

PurposeTo compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with ocular response analyzer (ORA) with and without soft contact lenses (CL) on eye.MethodsGoldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were measured in 56 eyes of 28 subjects without any ocular pathology, using ORA. One eye was fitted with Narafilcon A (1-Day Acuvue True Eye, Johnson & Johnson) and the other eye with Nelfilcon A (Daily AquaComfort Plus, Ciba Vision), each with −3.00D and IOPg and IOPcc were again measured over CL. The variation in the IOP with and without CL was determined.ResultsOut of 28 subjects, 54% (15) were female. Mean age of the subjects was 29.4 ± 9.8 years. Both the IOPg and IOPcc when measured with CL, were found statistically significantly lower than without CL (p < 0.05). In subjects wearing Narafilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found 0.88 ± 2.04 mmHg and 1.55 ± 2.16 mmHg lower than without CL, respectively. Similarly, with Nelfilcon A lens, IOPg and IOPcc were found to be 1.03 ± 1.93 mmHg and 1.62 ± 3.12 mmHg lower, respectively. IOPcc was highly affected and underestimated by more than 3 mmHg in upto 36% of the subjects.ConclusionMeasurement of IOP over minus (−3.00D) CL with ORA is dependent upon CL properties when measured in normal IOP population. It showed lower IOP over Narafilcon A and Nelfilcon A soft CL in comparison to the pressures measured without lenses. IOPg was found less affected by CL. For the accurate measurement of IOP with ORA, CL should be removed.     

Corneal changes following short-term rigid contact lens wear

PurposeThe aim of this cross-over study was to investigate the changes in corneal thickness, anterior and posterior corneal topography, corneal refractive power and ocular wavefront aberrations, following the short term use of rigid contact lenses.MethodFourteen participants wore 4 different types of contact lenses (RGP lenses of 9.5 mm and 10.5 mm diameter, and for comparison a PMMA lens of 9.5 mm diameter and a soft silicone hydrogel lens) on 4 different days for a period of 8 h on each day. Measures were collected before and after contact lens wear and additionally on a baseline day.ResultsAnterior corneal curvature generally showed a flattening with both of the RGP lenses and a steepening with the PMMA lens. A significant negative correlation was found between the change in corneal swelling and central and peripheral posterior corneal curvature (all p ≤ 0.001). RGP contact lenses caused a significant decrease in corneal refractive power (hyperopic shift) of approximately 0.5 D. The PMMA contact lenses caused the greatest corneal swelling in both the central (27.92 ± 15.49 μm, p < 0.001) and peripheral (17.78 ± 12.11 μm, p = 0.001) corneal regions, a significant flattening of the posterior cornea and an increase in ocular aberrations (all p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionThe corneal swelling associated with RGP lenses was relatively minor, but there was slight central corneal flattening and a clinically significant hyperopic change in corneal refractive power after the first day of lens wear. The PMMA contact lenses resulted in significant corneal swelling and reduced optical performance of the cornea.     

Corneal biomechanical properties: Precision and influence on tonometry

PurposeTo assess the precision and reproducibility of the corneal biomechanical parameters, and their relationships with the intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with the Goldmann tonometer and a noncontact tonometer.MethodsReadings for biomechanical properties and for IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers, were taken on one randomly selected eye of 106 normal subjects, on each one of two measurement sessions. Measurements with the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the noncontact tonometer were randomized, followed by the measurement of central corneal thickness and with the Goldmann tonometer.ResultsRepeatability coefficients for CCT, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in Session 1 were ±0.01 μm, ±3.05 mmHg and ±2.62 mmHg, respectively. The mean CCT, CH, CRF, Goldmann and noncontact tonometry did not vary significantly between sessions. Reproducibility coefficients for CCT, CH and CRF were ±0.02 μm, ±2.19 mmHg and ±1.97 mmHg, respectively. Univariate regression analysis showed that CCT, CH and CRF significantly (P < 0.0001) correlated with the IOP measured with the Goldmann and noncontact tonometers (and with the differences between tonometers) in Session 1. There were no significant correlations with the differences between tonometers in Session 2. Multivariate analysis revealed a minimal effect of CCT on Goldmann measurements but a significant effect on those of the noncontact tonometer.ConclusionsMeasurement of the biomechanical properties of the cornea, using the ORA, are repeatable and reproducible, affect Goldmann tonometry less than noncontact tonometry, and have a minimal influence on the difference in measured intraocular pressure between tonometers.     

The accuracy of Goldmann applanation tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lenses in patients with glaucoma

PurposeTo investigate the accuracy of measuring intraocular pressure over a silicone hydrogel contact lens using Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes with glaucoma.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized study and enrolled 28 patients (28 right eyes) with primary open angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was taken with and without a silicone hydrogel contact lens (−0.50 D), in situ (using Goldmann applanation tonometry), in a randomized order of measurements. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and Bland–Altman plot.ResultsThe mean difference (± standard deviation) found between intraocular pressure measurement without (mean 16.7 ± 3.2 mmHg) and with (mean 17.3 ± 3.0 mmHg) contact lens was found to be −0.57 ± 2.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval, −1.5 to 0.3). No significant statistical difference was found between the two groups with paired t-test (p = 0.19). The Bland Altman plot showed some evidence of increasing variability of differences between two measures of intraocular pressure, with increasing intraocular pressure. The 95% limits of agreement of the Bland Altman plot were unacceptably large (−5 mmHg to 3.9 mmHg).ConclusionAgreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry with and without contact lenses seems to be poor in patients with glaucoma, especially for high intraocular pressure.     

Trend of soft contact lens prescribing in an optometry centre in India: A 6-year analysis

This six-year retrospective longitudinal study was conducted to examine the changes in the pattern of prescribing soft contact lenses in an optometry centre located in a University in South India. Details regarding the type of lenses, lens material, wearing pattern and the clinical diagnoses were analyzed from January 2006 to December 2011. A total of 1273 soft contact lens fits (n = 1273) were analyzed. Two-third of the total lenses dispensed was for females and their mean age (24.0 ± 8.3 yrs) was less than that of male (27.0 ± 11.2 yrs) lens users. Nearly 70% of them had myopia and 48% wore conventional soft contact lenses. During the studied six years, the percentage of conventional lenses declined by 60%. This study demonstrated a gradual and significant increase in popularity of disposable contact lenses and silicone hydrogel lens material which is comparable to the global trend.     

Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: Long term outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the success rate of highly gas permeable scleral contact lenses (SCL) for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty (PK), over a period of up to 9 years.MethodsA total database of 31 consecutive patient fitted with SCL between January 2004 and December 2009 was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, etiology prior to lens fitting, visual outcomes, follow up time and complications were analyzed.ResultsAll eyes were fitted due to inadequate spectacle-corrected vision after successful penetrating keratoplasty or failure of other contact lens modalities. Out of 31 patients fitted, 28 (33 eyes) continue to wear SCL for periods between 0.5 and 8.8 years. The mean duration of follow-up after contact lens fitting was 5.2 ± 2.2 years. The mean age of corneal graft was 17.6 ± 11.4 years (range 4.3–42), and the mean interval between PK and initial contact lens fitting was 12.2 ± 10.7 years (range 0.7–36.0). The average steepest keratometry of our cohort was 55.0 ± 7.5 diopter (D) and the refractive astigmatism was 8.0 ± 4.4 D. The mean contact lens corrected visual acuity (BCVAcl) was 0.78 ± 0.25 (range 0.3–1.2). Twenty-three (82%) patients achieved a functional vision of 0.5 or more.During the studied period, ten (30.0%) eyes presented at least one graft rejection episode and two eyes (6%) had an episode of microbial keratitis. Corneal transplants of 20 years or more show a higher rate of refits due to ectasia recurrence.ConclusionsScleral lenses should be considered as lens of choice in eyes with complex corneal geometry, as besides visual rehabilitation, their use may delay or prevent further surgical involvement.     

The effect of tinted soft contact lens wear on functional visual acuity and higher-order aberrations

PurposeTo investigate the differences of functional visual acuity (FVA) and high order aberrations (HOAs) in relation to tinted and clear hydrogel soft contact lens (SCL) wear.MethodsA prospective comparative study was performed in 16 eyes of 16 healthy volunteers. Dynamic visual acuity (using a FVA measurement system) and higher-order aberrations (using a wavefront sensor) were compared in subjects wearing two types of soft contact lenses: 1-day Acuvue^® (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) clear and the 1-day Acuvue^® Define^TM (Vistakon, Jacksonville, FL) tinted lens. The blink rates were recorded during FVA testing. The correlation between the difference of HOAs and differences in FVA values was analyzed.ResultsThe mean LogMAR FVA scores with clear and tinted SCLs were 0.07 ± 0.13 and 0.14 ± 0.17 (P < 0.05). The mean blink frequencies with clear and tinted SCL wear were 18.4 ± 8.3 and 25.3 ± 4.7 blinks/min (P < 0.05). Both 3rd-order aberrations and total HOAs showed statistically significant differences between the two types of soft contact lenses for 6 mm pupil measurements (P < 0.05). A significant positive linear correlation was observed between ΔHOAs and ΔLogMAR FVA for 6 mm pupil measurements (R = 0.53, P = 0.04).ConclusionsTinted contact lens wear appears to induce a reduction in optical quality. Functional visual acuity measurement is a useful procedure to study the changes of visual performance and quality in tinted contact lens wear.     

In vitro power profiles of daily disposable contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the distribution of refractive power within the optic zone of different soft contact lenses and to investigate the effect of lens decentration on the power profiles.MethodsThe Nimo TR1504 instrument was used to measure the optical power across different aperture diameters (from 1.5 mm to 5.5 mm in steps of 0.5 mm) of four daily disposable contact lenses: DAILIES TOTAL1, Proclear 1-Day, SofLens daily disposable and 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST. Measurements were performed using a wet cell. Power data were evaluated when contact lenses were in its centered position and after inducing different amounts of lens decentration (from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm in steps of 0.2 mm).ResultsAll contact lenses showed an increase – more negative – in lens power with distance from the lens center. The amount of change varied depending on the lens. It was about 10% of lens power for DAILIES TOTAL1 (−0.29 diopters (D)), SofLens daily disposable (−0.36 D), and Proclear 1-Day (−0.32 D) whereas 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST showed a percentage variation of 3.3% (−0.10 D). After inducing a lens decentration up to 1 mm, the power curves were shifted in the negative direction. However, the change obtained in lens power compared with well-centered position was always lower than a quarter of diopter both for all the lenses and aperture diameters.ConclusionsOur results showed a variation of the refractive power from the lens center, becoming more negative toward the periphery, with a negligible effect of the decentration for all disposable contact lenses studied.     

Efficacy of spherical aberration correction based on contact lens power

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy of spherical aberration (SA) correction with aspheric contact lenses (aspheric lenses) based on lens power, and compare the results with those of spherical contact lenses (spherical lenses).MethodsOcular higher-order aberrations were measured with a wavefront sensor, in 11 myopic subjects wearing an aspheric lens (Medalist Fresh fit (PUREVISION 2 HD); Bausch + Lomb) or a spherical lens (ACUVUE Oasys; Johnson & Johnson). Six different lens powers (−7.00 diopters (D), −5.00 D, −3.00 D, −1.00 D, +1.00 D, +3.00 D) were used for all subjects. The amount of SA correction from the contact lens at each power was calculated as the difference between SA with the contact lens on-eye and SA of the eye alone.ResultsFor the spherical lenses, SA correction was close to 0.00 μm for the +1.00 D lens, became more positive as the labeled lens power increased and became more negative as the labeled lens power decreased. For the aspheric lenses, SA correction was consistent, from −0.15 to −0.05 μm, for all lens powers except for the −1.00 D lens. SA correction for the spherical and aspheric lenses was significantly different at −7.00 D (p = 0.040), −3.00 D (p = 0.015), −1.00 D (p < 0.001), +1.00 D (p = 0.006), and +3.00 D (p < 0.001) powers.ConclusionAn aspheric lens is capable of correcting SA at different lens powers, and has SA correction in the range of −0.15 to −0.05 μm over a 6 mm aperture.     

Clinical performance of an orthokeratology lens fitted with the aid of a computer software in Chinese children

PurposeTo report the clinical performance of the orthokeratology (ortho-k) lens fitted with computer assisted system after 1-month of lens wear, in a group of children undergoing ortho-k treatment in a 2-year randomized myopic control study.MethodChildren aged 6–11 years old were fitted with the ortho-k lenses using computerized fitting. The initial myopia was 4.00–0.50 D and the initial refractive astigmatism was within 1.25 D. Lens performance, in terms of centration, myopic reduction, vision, ocular health status and lens binding incidence, was evaluated at one night, one week and one month after lens wear. Only data from the right eye was presented.ResultsThe initial spherical equivalent refraction (SER) for the 51 subjects was ?2.29 ± 0.81 D. The first fit success rate was 90%. The reduction of SER after one night and one week aftercare visit were 57% and 81%, respectively. At the one month visit, the mean reduction in SER was 89% with unaided logMAR visual acuity of 0.03 ± 0.11. Mild central corneal staining was found in 9–20% of the subjects at the aftercare visits. The incidences of lens binding at one night, one week and one month aftercare visits were 17%, 39% and 30%, respectively.ConclusionsComputer assisted system for Menicon Z Night lens fitting gave a high first fit success rate. Menicon Z Night lens was effective in myopic reduction and provided stable vision after one week of lens wear. Ocular health of the subjects after lens wear was generally unremarkable.     

Comparison of conventional method of contact lens fitting and software based contact lens fitting with Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with corneal scar

PurposeTo compare conventional method of contact lens fitting with software based contact lens fitting using Medmont corneal topographer in eyes with nebular and macular corneal scars.MethodsFifteen participants who were diagnosed with nebular and macular scars were fitted with rigid gas permeable lenses using conventional method of contact lens fitting. During the lens dispensing visit, participants underwent Medmont corneal topography. Agreement between the two methods of contact lens fitting was studied.ResultsParameters of contact lenses which were concluded using conventional method was compared to that of software based fitting. Mean difference in base curve of contact lens between the two methods was 0.094 mm ± 0.147 mm (95% CI: +0.383 to −0.194). Mean difference in diameter of contact lens between the two methods was 0.16 mm ± 0.172 mm (95% CI: +0.497 to −0.177). Contact lens parameters that were achieved using two different methods of fitting showed good correlation. Correlation coefficients, as comparison of two methods in base curve and diameter were 0.96 (P < 0.05) and 0.94 (P < 0.05), respectively.ConclusionSoftware based contact lens fitting would be useful for contact lens practitioners to predict initial base curve of contact lens in corneal scars.     

Which soft contact lens power is better for piggyback fitting in keratoconus?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of differente soft contact lens power in the anterior corneal curvature and regularity in subjects with keratoconus.MethodsNineteen subjects (30 eyes) with keratoconus were included in the study. Six corneal topographies were taken with Pentacam Eye System over the naked eye and successively with soft lens (Senofilcon A) powers of −3.00, −1.50, 0.00, +1.50 and +3.00 D. Corneal measurements of mean central keratometry (MCK), maximum tangential curvature (TK), maximum front elevation (MFE) and eccentricity (Ecc) at 6 and 8 mm diameters as well as anterior corneal surface high order aberrations (i.e. total RMS, spherical- and coma-like and secondary astigmatism) were evaluated.ResultsNegative- and plano-powered soft lenses flattened (p < 0.05 in all cases), whereas positive-powered lenses did not induce any significant changes (p > 0.05 in all cases) in MCK in comparison to the naked eye. The TK power decreased with negative lenses (p < 0.05 in both cases) and increased with +3.00 D lenses (p = 0.03) in comparison to the naked eye. No statistically significant differences were found in MFE with any soft lens power in comparison to the naked eye (p > 0.05 in all cases). Corneal eccentricity increased at 8 mm diameter for all lens powers (p < 0.05 in all cases). No statistically differences were found in HOA RMS and spherical-like aberration (both p > 0.05). Statistically differences were found in coma-like and secondary astigmatism (both p < 0.05).ConclusionNegative-powered soft contact lenses provide a flatter anterior surface in comparison to positive-powered lenses in subjects with keratoconus and thus they might be more suitable for piggyback contact lens fitting.     

Kerasoft IC compared to Rose-K in the management of corneal ectasias

PurposeTo determine the efficacy of the KeraSoft^® IC (KIC) (Ultravision International Limited, Bedfordshire, UK), a silicone hydrogel contact lens, for the optical management of non-surgical corneal ectasias and to compare it with the Rose-K 2 RGP contact lens.MethodsIn a retrospective study ninety-four eyes fitted with KIC (group A) were compared with seventy-seven eyes fitted with Rose-K^® RGP lenses as a control group. Ocular diagnoses, corneal curvature by topography, refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and age at time of fitting were noted. Outcome data included average daily wearing time, contact lens complications, visual acuity with the lens (BCLCVA), power of the lenses and length of follow-up.ResultsDifferences in either BCLCVA or wearing time could not be statistically established (p = 0.63, p = 0.15) between both groups. More biomicroscopic complications were found in the RGP group, basically corneal staining (P < 0.0001). In the KIC group, BCLCVA was statistically similar between types of ectasia (p = 0.19) as well as in mild and moderate keratoconus (p = 0.45).ConclusionsKIC is a good alternative for the optical management of irregular corneal astigmatism in non surgical corneal ectasias such as keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration.     

Peripheral myopization and visual performance with experimental rigid gas permeable and soft contact lens design

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of two experimental contact lenses (CL) designed to induce relative peripheral myopic defocus in myopic eyes.MethodsTen right eyes of 10 subjects were fitted with three different CL: a soft experimental lens (ExpSCL), a rigid gas permeable experimental lens (ExpRGP) and a standard RGP lens made of the same material (StdRGP). Central and peripheral refraction was measured using a Grand Seiko open-field autorefractometer across the central 60° of the horizontal visual field. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartman-Shack aberrometer, and monocular contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was measured with a VCTS6500 without and with the three contact lenses.ResultsBoth experimental lenses were able to increase significantly the relative peripheral myopic defocus up to −0.50 D in the nasal field and −1.00 D in the temporal field (p < 0.05). The ExpRGP induced a significantly higher myopic defocus in the temporal field compared to the ExpSCL. ExpSCL induced significantly lower levels of Spherical-like HOA than ExpRGP for the 5 mm pupil size (p < 0.05). Both experimental lenses kept CSF within normal limits without any statistically significant change from baseline (p > 0.05).ConclusionsRGP lens design seems to be more effective to induce a significant myopic change in the relative peripheral refractive error. Both lenses preserve a good visual performance. The worsened optical quality observed in ExpRGP was due to an increased coma-like and spherical-like HOA. However, no impact on the visual quality as measured by CSF was observed.     

Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort,tear stability and ocular physiology

Aim

Retrospective analysis of different contact lens wearing groups suggests lens surface lubricity is the main factor influencing contact lens comfort. However, the examined commercially available contact lenses differ in material and design as well as surface properties. Hence this study isolates the contribution of lens surface properties using an ultra-thin coating technology.

Disability glare in soft multifocal contact lenses

Purpose

The study investigated the effect of the design of multifocal contact lenses on the sensitivity to contrast and disability glare.

Comparison of fitting stability of the different soft toric contact lenses

PurposeTo compare lens orientation and rotational recovery of five currently available soft toric lenses.MethodsTwenty subjects were recruited and trialed with each of the study lenses in a random order. Study lenses were PureVision^® Toric (B&L), Air Optix^® for Astigmatism (Alcon), Biofinity^® Toric (CooperVision), Acuvue^® Advance for Astigmatism (Vistakon), and Proclear^® Toric (CooperVision). Lens orientation in primary position to determine the lens rotation form the vertical position and rotational recovery to primary gaze orientation following a 45° manual misorientation for the different lenses was compared.ResultsThe Biofinity Toric showed the lowest rotation from the vertical position and the Proclear Toric the highest. Also, the highest and the lowest reorientation speed were related to the Biofinity Toric and the Acuvue Advance for Astigmatism, respectively. The Repeated Measures ANOVA showed a significant difference in the lens rotation (P = 0.004) and rotational recovery (P < 0.001) among different contact lenses and the performed multiple comparisons indicated differences in rotation and also in reorientation speed were only seen between the Biofinity Toric when compared to four other lenses (P < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough there was appropriate fitting, based upon lens orientation and reorientation speed, with each of the study lenses it would appear that the optimized ballast technique used in the design of the Biofinity Toric helps reduce lens rotation and improve rotational recovery compared to others.     

Objective and subjective visual performance of multifocal contact lenses: Pilot study

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to compare the objective and subjective visual performance of three different soft multifocal contact lenses.Methods10 subjects (habitual soft contact lens wearers) between the ages of 40 and 45 years participated in the study. Three different multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lenses (Acuvue Oasys, Air Optix and Biofinity) were fit within the same visit. All the lenses were fit according to the manufacturers’ recommendation using the respective fitting guide. Visual performance tests included low and high contrast distance and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, range of clear vision and through-focus curve. Objective visual performance tests included measurement of open field accommodative response at different defocus levels and optical aberrations at different viewing distances.ResultsAccommodative response was not significantly different between the three types of multifocal contact lenses at each of the accommodative stimulus levels (p > 0.05). Accommodative lag increased for higher stimulus levels for all 3 types of contact lenses. Ocular aberrations were not significantly different between these 3 contact lens designs at each of the different viewing distances (p > 0.05). In addition, optical aberrations did not significantly differ between different viewing distances for any of these lenses (p > 0.05). ANOVA revealed no significant difference in high and low contrast distance visual acuity as well as near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function between the 3 multifocal contact lenses and spectacles (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThere was no statistically significant difference in accommodative response, optical aberrations or visual performance between the 3 multifocal contact lenses in early presbyopes.     

Morphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot study

PurposeConjunctival epithelial flap (CEF) is a conjunctival condition most commonly seen in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers. This study utilized impression cytology to investigate the cellular composition and health of CEFs.MethodsNine (9) subjects were enrolled – 3 non-lens wearers, 3 contact lens wearers without CEF, and 3 contact lens wearers with CEFs wearing 8.4/13.8 lotrafilcon A lenses. Impression cytology samples were collected from the flap or similar locations, if CEF was absent, using rectangular 5 mm × 2 mm Millipore HAWP02500 membrane filters. The filters were gently pressed onto the conjunctiva, subsequently fixed in 95% alcohol, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated under an Olympus IX70 microscope. Measurements of the longest cell and nucleus dimensions were measured on 40 cells from each filter by utilizing NIH Image 1.63.ResultsCEF consisted of multilayers of epithelial and goblet cells and were devoid of inflammatory cells, basement membrane material and stromal tissue. The cytoplasmic and nuclear dimensions were similar within the groups and the cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio was not different between the flap group and the non-lens wearing group.ConclusionThe CEF appeared to be formed by healthy epithelial and goblet cells that have been dislocated from their normal location along the conjunctival surface by the lens edge. No inflammatory cells were present in this contact lens induced condition, which is reported to be associated most commonly with the silicone hydrogel material.     

Overnight orthokeratology with two brands of reverse-geometry contact lenses

PurposeTo evaluate the refractive and corneal topographical changes of overnight orthokeratology in myopia with two brands of contact lenses.MethodsFourty-four eyes of 22 myopic patients with manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of −1.00 to −5.00 D (cylinder ≤ −1.0) were fitted with either DreamLens (Hanita Lenses Investments, Hanita, Israel) (group A) or Rinehart–Reeves (R&R; Danker Laboratories, Sarasota, FL) (group B) reverse-geometry lenses. Each subject eye was evaluated in regards to the uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities, manifest refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and corneal topography at each follow-up examination.ResultsThe follow-up was 1 year. For groups A and B, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was −0.02 ± 0.10 log MAR (20/20) and −0.08 ± 0.12 log MAR (20/20) respectively at year-1 examination. The mean MRSE decreased from −2.70 ± 0.9 D to −0.50 ± 0.08 D in group A and −3.1 ± 1.1 to −0.62 ± 0.18 D in group B at week-1; and remained stable thereafter in each group. For both groups, starting with week-1, the mean anterior best-fit sphere (ABFS) was statistically significantly flatter from baseline. A high correlation was found between the change in apical corneal power (ACP) and MRSE (r₁ = 0.79, r₂ = 0.71), and there was a good correlation between the change in ABFS and MRSE (r₁ = 0.67, r₂ = 0.64) in both groups. No significant ocular adverse events were observed during study.ConclusionsBoth types of contact lenses safely and effectively decreased the myopic refractive error at 1 year follow-up. The refractive effect was mainly induced by the changes in the anterior corneal shape and the ACP.