Comparisons of oral propafenone and sotalol as an initial treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propafenone versus sotalol as an initial choice of treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), according to a double-blind randomized system. In the oral propafenone group (n = 41), 2 patients (5%) discontinued therapy because of gastrointestinal discomfort in 1 and dizziness in the other. Thirty-one (79%) of the 39 patients who continued the treatment had effective response to oral propafenone (>75% reduction of symptomatic arrhythmic attacks) on a mean dose of 663 +/- 99 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 10 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. In the oral sotalol group (n = 38), 4 patients (11%) discontinued treatment because of dizziness in 2 and symptomatic bradycardia in 2. Twenty-six of the 34 patients (76%) who continued the treatment had effective response to oral sotalol on a mean dose of 200 +/- 57 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 11 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. Comparisons of the results between propafenone and sotalol groups showed a similar incidence of intolerable (2 of 41 vs 4 of 38, p = 0.42) and tolerable side effects (10 of 39 vs 8 of 34, p = 1.0). The attack frequency at baseline (11 +/- 3 vs 10 +/- 4 times per week, p = 0.23) and after treatment (3 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 2 times per week, p = 0.85) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The incidence of effective response to drugs was also similar (31 of 39 vs 26 of 34, p = 0.78). Furthermore, the decrease of symptom scores (-32 +/- 8% vs -29 +/- 7%, p = 0.18) and percentage decrease of ventricular rate (-15 +/- 4% vs -18 +/- 4%, p = 0.10) during AF were also similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, oral propafenone and sotalol are equally effective and safe in preventing attacks and alleviating symptoms of paroxysmal AF.     

The effect of sotalol hydrochloride therapy on atrial signal-averaged ECG in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: There has been a continuing public debate about assisted suicide and the proper role, if any, of physicians in this practice. Legislative bans and various forms of legalization have been proposed. METHODS: We mailed questionnaires to three stratified random samples of Michigan physicians in specialties likely to involve the care of terminally ill patients: 500 in the spring of 1994, 500 in the summer of 1994, and 600 in the spring of 1995. Similar questionnaires were mailed to stratified random samples of Michigan adults: 449 in the spring of 1994 and 899 in the summer of 1994. Several different questionnaire forms were used, all of which included questions about whether physician-assisted suicide should be banned in Michigan or legalized under certain conditions. RESULTS: Usable questionnaires were returned by 1119 of 1518 physicians eligible for the study (74 percent), and 998 of 1307 eligible adults in the sample of the general public (76 percent). Asked to choose between legalization of physician-assisted suicide and an explicit ban, 56 percent of physicians and 66 percent of the public support legalization, 37 percent of physicians and 26 percent of the public preferred a ban, and 8 percent of each group were uncertain. When the physicians were given a wider range of choices, 40 percent preferred legalization, 37 percent preferred "no law" (i.e., no government regulation), 17 percent favored prohibition, and 5 percent were uncertain. If physician-assisted suicide were legal, 35 percent of physicians said they might participate if requested--22 percent would participate in either assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, and 13 percent would participate only in assisted suicide. Support for physician-assisted suicide was lowest among the strongly religious. CONCLUSIONS: Most Michigan physicians prefer either the legalization of physician-assisted suicide or no law at all; fewer than one fifth prefer a complete ban on the practice. Given a choice between legalization and a ban, two thirds of the Michigan public prefer legalization and one quarter prefer a ban.     

Preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation occurs commonly after open-heart surgery and may delay hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized study, 124 patients were given either oral amiodarone (64 patients) or placebo (60 patients) for a minimum of seven days before elective cardiac surgery. Therapy consisted of 600 mg of amiodarone per day for seven days, then 200 mg per day until the day of discharge from the hospital. The mean (+/-SD) preoperative total dose of amiodarone was 4.8+/-0.96 g over a period of 13+/-7 days. RESULTS: Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 16 of the 64 patients in the amiodarone group (25 percent) and 32 of the 60 patients in the placebo group (53 percent) (P=0.003). Patients in the amiodarone group were hospitalized for significantly fewer days than were patients in the placebo group (6.5+/-2.6 vs. 7.9+/-4.3 days, P=0.04). Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in eight amiodarone-treated patients (12 percent) and in six patients receiving placebo (10 percent, P=0.78). Fatal postoperative complications occurred in three patients who received amiodarone (5 percent) and in two who received placebo (3 percent, P= 1.00). Total hospitalization costs were significantly less for the amiodarone group than for the placebo group ($18,375+/-$13,863 vs. $26,491+/-$23,837, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative oral amiodarone in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and the duration and cost of hospitalization.     

Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing

OBJECTIVES: We investigated 1) the feasibility, safety and efficacy of multisite right atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF); and 2) the ability of atrial pacing in single- and dual-site modes to increase arrhythmia-free intervals in patients with drug-refractory AF. BACKGROUND: We recently developed and applied a novel technique of dual-site right atrial pacing in an unselected group of consecutive patients with AF requiring demand pacing. A prospective crossover study design was used to evaluate single- and dual-site right atrial pacing modes. METHODS: The frequency of AF during the 3 months before pacemaker implantation was analyzed. Consecutive consenting patients underwent insertion of two atrial leads and one ventricular lead with a DDDR pulse generator. Patients were placed in a dual-site pacing mode for the first 3 months and subsequently mode switched to single site pacing for 3 months. Mode switching was repeated at 6-month intervals thereafter. RESULTS: Atrial pacing resulted in a marked decline in AF recurrences (p < 0.001). During dual-site pacing with an optimal drug regimen, there was no AF recurrence in any patient compared with five recurrences in 12 patients during single-site pacing (p = 0.03). The mean (+/-SD) arrhythmia-free interval before pacing (14 +/- 14 days) was prolonged with dual- (89 +/- 7 days, p < 0.0001) and single-site pacing (76 +/- 27 days, p < 0.0001). Symptomatic AF episodes showed a declining trend during dual- and single-site pacing compared with those during the preimplantation period (p = 0.10). Mean antiarrhythmic drug use for all classes declined from 4 +/- 1.9 drugs before implantation to 1.5 +/- 0.5 (p < 0.01) drugs after implantation. Twelve (80%) of 15 patients remained in atrial paced rhythm at 13 +/- 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that multisite right atrial pacing is feasible, effective and safe for long-term application. Atrial pacing significantly prolongs arrhythmia-free intervals in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Dual-site right atrial pacing may offer additional benefits and should be considered either as the primary mode or in patients unresponsive to single-site pacing.     

Comparison of sotalol with digoxin-quinidine for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (the Sotalol-Digoxin-Quinidine Trial)

We randomized 61 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ( < 48 hours from onset) to either sotalol or quinidine treatment. Conversion of rhythm was recorded by Holter monitoring. The starting 80 mg dose of sotalol was repeated at 2, 6, and 10 hours if AF persisted (heart rate > 80 beats/min), and if systolic blood was > or = 120 mm Hg. In the quinidine group, if heart rate > 100 beats/min, it was decreased with intravenous digoxin, whereafter 200 mg of oral quinidine sulfate was given maximally 3 times, each dose 2 hours apart. Conversion of AF to sinus rhythm occurred in 17 or 33 patients (52%) taking sotalol, and in 24 of 28 patients (86%) taking quinidine (p < 0.0001). Electric cardioversion was necessary in 39% of the former and in 14% of the latter group. The mean delay from first trial drug to sinus rhythm with the trial medication was 10.2 +/- 7.6 hours in the sotalol group and 4.0 +/- 2.9 hours in the quinidine group (p < 0.01). Treatment was discontinued in 16 patients taking sotalol (48%) because of asymptomatic bradycardia or hypotension, and in 20 taking quinidine (71%) because of rhythm conversion. Asymptomatic wide complex tachycardia (QRS > 0.12 second) was found in 13% and 27% of patients taking sotalol and quinidine, respectively. The longest RR intervals were 6.4 and 3.8 seconds in the sotalol and quinidine groups, respectively. Oral sotalol did not appear as effective as quinidine sulfate treatment in conversion of paroxysmal AF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative hemodynamic effects of amiodarone, sotalol, and d-sotalol

The effects of intravenous boluses of amiodarone (5 mg/kg), racemic sotalol (enantiomeric ratio d/l-sotalol 1:1;1.5 mg/kg), and d-sotalol (0.75 mg/kg) on mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and peak rate of change of left ventricular pressure (LV dp/dt) were assessed in conscious rabbits. Amiodarone and sotalol had a modest negative inotropic effect: amiodarone reduced peak LV dp/dt by 8 +/ 2% (mean +/- SEM) (p < 0.05) and sotalol by 6 +/- 2% (p < 0.05). These two drugs had quite different effects on CO as a result of differences in their actions on peripheral blood vessels: amiodarone caused a 13 +/- 3% (p < 0.05) increase in CO associated with a substantial vasodilatory effect (TPR reduced 25 +/- 3%; p < 0.01); sotalol did not produce any substantial change in either CO or TPR. Bolus intravenous injection of amiodarone was associated with a significant increase in HR (12 +/- 3%; p < 0.01), whereas sotalol reduced HR by 7 +/- 1% (p < 0.05). In contrast, administration of the dextro-rotatory optical isomer, d-sotalol, produced no significant change in peak LV dp/dt, LVEDP, CO, TPR, or HR. These results confirm that amiodarone and racemic sotalol have a comparatively weak cardiodepressant action. The experiments also show that the reduction in cardiac performance associated with racemic sotalol is mediated predominantly through the beta-adrenoreceptor blocking action of the levo-rotatory isomer (l-sotalol) rather than any substantial cardiodepressant effect of the dextro-rotatory isomer.     

Implantable atrial defibrillator for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common problem. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches have limited therapeutic efficacy in many patients. Low energy transvenous atrial defibrillation using catheters positioned inside the right atrium and cornonary sinus has been shown to be efficacious in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. We report the successful use of this technology in an implantable form in a patient with symptomatic atrial fibrillation. The patient could be kept in sinus rhythm using an implanted atrial defibrillator.     

Asymptomatic arrhythmias in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are recognized clinically when patients seek treatment for symptoms due to recurrent arrhythmias; atrial fibrillation also increases the risk of stroke. The frequency with which asymptomatic arrhythmias occur in patients with these arrhythmias is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 8) or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n = 14) were studied for 29 days with two different ambulatory ECG-monitoring techniques to measure the relative frequency of asymptomatic and symptomatic arrhythmias. All class I antiarrhythmic drugs, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, and digitalis were withheld. Sustained asymptomatic arrhythmia events (defined as lasting at least 30 seconds) were documented using continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring once weekly for a total of 5 of the 29 study days; symptomatic arrhythmia events were documented using transtelephonic ECG monitoring for all 29 days of the study. In the group of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, asymptomatic arrhythmia events occurred significantly more frequently than symptomatic arrhythmia events; the mean rates, expressed as events/100 d/patient (95% confidence interval), were 62.5 (40.4, 87.3) and 5.2 (2.7, 9.0) (P < .01); the ratio of the mean rates was 12.1 (5.8, 26.4). In contrast, in the group of patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, asymptomatic arrhythmia events were significantly less frequent than symptomatic arrhythmia events; the mean rates were 0.0 (0.0, 5.3) and 7.4 (5.0, 10.6) (P = .02). The ratio of the mean rates was 0.0 (0.0, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: In a group of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, sustained asymptomatic atrial fibrillation occurs far more frequently than symptomatic atrial fibrillation. However, it is not known whether asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is a potential risk factor for stroke even when patients are not having symptomatic arrhythmias.     

Surgical therapy for atrial fibrillation

Women who presented to a University psychiatric hospital were categorized into those with childbearing-related onset illness (CBROI, n = 168) and compared to those with non-childbearing-related onset illness (NCBROI, n = 1004). Women with CBROI were an average of five years younger. The two groups did not differ in membership across five major psychiatric diagnostic categories. However, women with CBROI were given the specific diagnosis adjustment disorder with depressed mood more frequently. Anxiety disorders were also common in women with CBROI. Most women with CBROI had the onset of illness during the postpartum period compared to during pregnancy or after pregnancy loss.     

Drugs for conversion of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients visiting a primary care practice. Although many patients with atrial fibrillation experience relief of symptoms with control of the heart rate, some patients require restoration of sinus rhythm. External direct current (DC) cardioversion is the most effective means of converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Pharmacologic cardioversion, although less effective, offers an alternative to DC cardioversion. Several advances have been made in antiarrhythmic medications, including the development of ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug indicated for acute cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Other methods of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic cardioversion remain under development. Until the results of several large-scale randomized clinical trials are available, the decision to choose cardioversion or maintenance of sinus rhythm must be individualized, based on relief of symptoms and reduction of the morbidity and mortality associated with atrial fibrillation.     

Right atrial isolation for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect

Two patients with atrial fibrillation associated with an atrial septal defect underwent simultaneous surgical correction of the atrial septal defect and right atrial isolation. The right atrium was surgically isolated while the continuity with the sinoatrial node was preserved in the remainder of the heart. After the operation, the patients maintained normal sinus rhythm for 99 and 65 months. Thus, right atrial isolation offers an alternative to the current surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation associated with an atrial septal defect.     

A trial of the long-term use of Sedacorone (amiodarone) under polyclinic conditions for the prevention of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation

Sedacorone (amiodarone) was given to 70 outpatients with coronary heart disease for 1.5-2 years to prevent paroxysms of cardiac arrhythmia after recovery of sinus rhythm. Sedacorone was administered initially in the dose 600 mg/day for 10-12 days, then the dose lowering was adjusted to the tolerance, heart rate and ECG readings. The minimal dose of 200 mg/day was taken for 5 days a week with a 2-day interval. In adequate individual dose Sedacorone prevented paroxysms of cardiac fibrillation or made the paroxysms less frequent in 91.4% of patients. Careful selection of patients and regular control helped avoid serious cardial and extracardiac complications. Sedacorone is recommended as a first-line medicine for outpatients with frequent paroxysms of cardiac fibrillations after recovery of the sinus rhythm to prevent the paroxysms recurrences.     

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Cardioversion to sinus rhythm should be considered for all patients in atrial fibrillation in order to improve cardiac performance and perhaps to reduce the long-term risk of thromboembolic complications. Different methods of cardioversion, whether electrical or pharmacological, exist and there is often uncertainty about performing the procedure. In particular, there is often confusion about the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs and the suitable length of anticoagulant therapy required pre- and post-cardioversion. This review discusses the current understanding of electrical and pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, the clinical effects and the role of prophylactic anti-arrhythmic and anticoagulant therapy in this procedure.     

Anatomy-guided linear atrial lesions for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

The surgical atrial maze procedure has provided proof that atrial fibrillation can be cured by performing atrial incisions based on anatomical and electrophysiological principles. Preliminary reports of attempts at radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing an anatomy-based "linear incision" method have shown the feasibility of the method. However, postprocedural atrial fibrillation recurrence has been common and in addition new, uniform tachycardias have developed in some patients. Both of these outcomes may be in part due to incomplete or inconsistent lesion deployment. This article details the use of the CARTO system for deploying anatomy guided linear atrial lesions for the purpose of curing atrial fibrillation. The procedure is comprised of three phases, which are discussed in detail: (1) baseline map; (2) lesion deployment and; (3) lesion assessment. Using a single standard ablation electrode, lesions can be deployed safely, and complete lesions can be confirmed. Paradigms for right and left atrial incisions are proposed.     

Management of postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common complication of heart surgery. Consequences for the patient who develops this dysrhythmia are many. It prolongs hospitalization, may induce hemodynamic compromise, and carries the risks of thromboembolism and stroke. Ongoing research for the past 30 years has identified several potential etiologies; therefore, management must be highly individualized. This article reviews current and past research on postoperative atrial fibrillation with a focus on individualized prevention and treatment of this problematic heart surgery complication.