A double-blind, controlled comparison of the novel antipsychotic olanzapine versus haloperidol or placebo on anxious and depressive symptoms accompanying schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are a common feature of schizophrenia and may represent a core part of the illness. Where present, it has been associated with greater overall morbidity and mortality. Monotherapy with conventional dopamine antagonists may either worsen or bestow a limited therapeutic benefit. Accordingly the use of adjunctive thymoleptics has been explored. In contrast, olanzapine (OLZ), an atypical antipsychotic agent, offers a distinctive and pleotropic pharmacology suggestive of a broader efficacy profile than conventional neuroleptic agents. METHODS: In a 6-week placebo- and haloperidol (HAL)-controlled trial with 335 randomized subjects with chronic schizophrenia in an acute exacerbation, three fixed dose ranges of OLZ (5, 10, or 15 +/- 2.5 mg) were evaluated versus HAL (10-20 mg) or placebo. RESULTS: Baseline to endpoint change in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale including the anxiety-depression cluster (items 1, 2, 5, 9) was analyzed. Two dose ranges of OLZ (10 +/- 2.5, 15 +/- 2.5) were superior to placebo (p < 05) in improving mood status, whereas HAL was not. CONCLUSION: Contributions from a more selective mesolimbic dopaminergic profile, D1 or D4 activity, the release of dopamine/norepinephrine in the prefrontal cortex, and/or serotonin 5-HT2A,C antagonism may explain the differential benefit seen with OLZ in the treatment of comorbid anxious and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia.     

Blind, controlled, long-term study of the comparative incidence of treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia with olanzapine or haloperidol

OBJECTIVE: Tardive dyskinesia is a serious and common complication of neuroleptic treatment. Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic agent exhibiting regional mesolimbic dopaminergic selectivity and a broad-based pharmacology encompassing serotonin, dopamine, muscarinic, and adrenergic receptor binding affinities. The authors' goal was to compare the incidence of tardive dyskinesia among patients receiving olanzapine and those receiving the conventional dopamine 2 antagonist haloperidol. METHOD: Data were analyzed from three actively controlled and blind long-term responder studies of subjects meeting DSM-III-R criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder treated with olanzapine (N = 707, up to 20 mg/day, 237 median days of exposure) or haloperidol (N = 197, up to 20 mg/day, 203 median days of exposure) who did not have evidence of tardive dyskinesia at baseline. All of the subjects had a chronic disease course (mean greater than 10 years), and there were no significant between-treatment group differences in demographic or disease characteristics. The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale and research diagnostic criteria for tardive dyskinesia were used to define the comparative incidence rates of long-term treatment-emergent tardive dyskinesia. RESULTS: The incidence of newly emergent tardive dyskinesia at any visit after baseline, at the final visit, and at the final two clinical assessments was statistically significantly lower among olanzapine-treated patients than among haloperidol-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an atypical extrapyramidal symptom profile and the potential of a significantly lower risk of tardive dyskinesia with olanzapine than with haloperidol among patients requiring maintenance antipsychotic treatment.     

Symptomatic colonic polyps in childhood: not so benign

We investigated the degree of striatal dopamine-2 (D2) receptor occupancy in six schizophrenic patients receiving clinically effective antipsychotic treatment with olanzapine 10-25 mg/day in comparison to patients treated with clozapine 300-600 mg/day (n = 6) or haloperidol 5-20 mg/day (n = 10). 123I Iodobenzamide (IBZM) and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) were used for the visualization of striatal D2 receptors. For the quantification of striatal D2 receptor occupancy, striatal IBZM binding in patients treated with antipsychotics was compared to that in untreated healthy controls (n = 8) reported earlier. Olanzapine led to a mean striatal D2 receptor occupancy rate of 75% (range 63-85). Haloperidol-treated patients showed dose-dependently (Pearson r = 0.64; P < 0.05) a significantly higher (P < 0.05) mean occupancy rate of 84% (range 67-94). During clozapine treatment, the mean D2 receptor occupancy of 33% (range < 20-49) was significantly lower than with olanzapine (P < 0.005). The higher striatal D2 receptor occupancy of haloperidol was correlated with the incidence and severity of extrapyramidal motor side-effects (EPS). No clinical relevant EPS occurred during treatment with olanzapine or clozapine. There was no correlation between the degree of striatal D2 receptor occupancy and clinical improvement.     

A randomized, placebo-controlled dose-comparison trial of haloperidol for psychosis and disruptive behaviors in Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of two doses of haloperidol and placebo in the treatment of psychosis and disruptive behaviors in patients with Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: In a 6-week random-assignment, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (phase A), haloperidol, 2-3 mg/day (standard dose), and haloperidol, 0.50-0.75 mg/day (low dose), were compared in 71 outpatients with Alzheimer's disease. For the subsequent 6-week double-blind crossover phase (phase B), patients taking standard- or low-dose haloperidol were switched to placebo, and patients taking placebo were randomly assigned to standard- or low-dose haloperidol. RESULTS: For the 60 patients who completed phase A, standard-dose haloperidol was efficacious and superior to both low-dose haloperidol and placebo for scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale psychosis factor and on psychomotor agitation. Response rates according to three sets of criteria were greater with the standard dose (55%-60%) than the low dose (25%-35%) and placebo (25%-30%). The advantage of standard dose over low dose was replicated in phase B. In phase A, extrapyramidal signs tended to be greater with the standard dose than in the other two conditions, primarily because of a subgroup (20%) who developed moderate to severe signs. Low-dose haloperidol did not differ from placebo on any measure of efficacy or side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated a favorable therapeutic profile for haloperidol in doses of 2-3 mg/day, although a subgroup developed moderate to severe extrapyramidal signs. A starting dose of 1 mg/day with gradual, upward dose titration is recommended. The narrow therapeutic window observed with haloperidol may also apply to other neuroleptics used in Alzheimer's disease patients with psychosis and disruptive behaviors.     

The effects of risperidone on the five dimensions of schizophrenia derived by factor analysis: combined results of the North American trials

BACKGROUND: In two double-blind trials conducted in North America, 513 patients with chronic schizophrenia received risperidone, haloperidol, or placebo. In the present study, combined data from the two trials were analyzed. METHOD: Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo, fixed doses of risperidone (2, 6, 10, and 16 mg/day) or 20 mg/day of haloperidol for 8 weeks. Factor analysis of scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) produced five dimensions (negative symptoms, positive symptoms, disorganized thought, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression), similar to the five dimensions of previous factor-analytic studies of PANSS data. RESULTS: Mean changes (symptom reductions) in PANSS factor scores from baseline to treatment Weeks 6 and 8 were significantly greater in patients receiving 6-16 mg/day of risperidone than in patients receiving placebo or haloperidol. The advantages of risperidone were greatest for negative symptoms, uncontrolled hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression. Even at the lowest dose, 2 mg/day, risperidone was significantly (p < or = .05) superior to haloperidol in reducing negative symptoms. The differences in outcomes between risperidone and haloperidol on PANSS scores were not related to extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Risperidone produced significantly (p < or = .05) greater improvements than haloperidol on all five dimensions. The large between-group differences on negative symptoms, hostility/excitement, and anxiety/depression suggest that risperidone and other serotonin/dopamine antagonists have qualitatively different effects from those of conventional antipsychotic agents.     

5-HT2 and D2 receptor occupancy of olanzapine in schizophrenia: a PET investigation

OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine is a new atypical antipsychotic recently introduced for the treatment of schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to investigate olanzapine's binding to the serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptors in schizophrenic patients being treated with clinically relevant doses. METHOD: Twelve patients with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/day of olanzapine in a prospective fashion. Three other subjects taking 30-40 mg/day were also included. Once steady-state plasma levels were achieved, dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptors were assessed by using [11C]raclopride and [18F]setoperone positron emission tomography imaging, respectively. Ratings of clinical status, extrapyramidal side effects, and prolactin levels were also obtained. RESULTS: Olanzapine induced near saturation of the 5-HT2 receptors, even at 5 mg/day. Its D2 occupancy increased with dose: patients taking 5-20 mg/day showed 43%-80% D2 occupancy, while patients taking 30-40 mg/day showed 83%-88%. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine is a potent 5-HT2 blocker and shows a higher 5-HT2 than D2 occupancy at all doses. However, its D2 occupancy is higher than that of clozapine and similar to that of risperidone. In the usual clinical dose range of 10-20 mg/day, its occupancy varies from 71% to 80%, and this restricted range may explain its freedom from extrapyramidal side effects and prolactin elevation. However, doses of 30 mg/day and higher are associated with more than 80% D2 occupancy and may have a higher likelihood of prolactin elevation and extrapyramidal side effects.     

Dextromethorphan phenotyping and haloperidol disposition in schizophrenic patients

This study examined the relationship between the metabolic ratios of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan, haloperidol disposition, and the incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in schizophrenic patients. Eighteen schizophrenic patients were phenotyped with a test dose of dextromethorphan prior to the initiation of haloperidol treatment. The metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan was determined in each patient. Patients were treated with oral haloperidol 10 mg/day for 2 weeks. Blood samples for haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were obtained at week 2 of haloperidol treatment. Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma concentrations were assayed by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Significant correlations of dextromethorphan/dextrorphan metabolic ratios vs. plasma haloperidol concentrations, reduced haloperidol concentrations, and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios were found (r = 0.726, P = 0.0007; r = 0.782, P = 0.0001; and r = 0.619, P = 0.006, respectively). Ten patients who experienced extrapyramidal side effects had higher reduced haloperidol concentrations and reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios than the other patients (2.49 +/- 1.42 [S.D.] ng/ml vs. 1.10 +/- 0.46 ng/ml, P = 0.014 and 0.287 +/- 0.102 vs. 0.192 +/- 0.065, P = 0.030). The former also had a trend to have higher haloperidol concentrations and dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios than the latter (8.04 +/- 2.91 ng/ml vs. 5.83 +/- 1.79 ng/ml, P = 0.066 and 0.023 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.011 +/- 0.010, P = 0.077). Phenotyping patients has the potential to assist clinicians in predicting plasma drug concentrations during the subsequent neuroleptic drug treatment. Further research with phenotyping and psychotropic drug metabolism in psychiatric patients is needed.     

Electrophoretic mobility of five polypeptides using nine different capillary chemistries over the pH range of 3.5-6.5

Clozapine has been shown to have superior effectiveness compared with classic neuroleptics in treating refractory schizophrenia in Caucasians, but its efficacy and safety in Chinese have not been adequately studied. Forty Chinese schizophrenic patients were recruited in a 12-week, double-blind, comparative trial. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to clozapine treatment and 19 to chlorpromazine treatment. The average dose was 543 +/- 157 and 1163 +/- 228 mg/day for clozapine and chlorpromazine, respectively. The results showed that six clozapine-treated patients (28.6%) had more than 20% improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score and were classified as responders, whereas none of the chlorpromazine-treated patients was classified as a responder. The degree of improvement in positive symptoms, negative symptoms and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores in the clozapine group was inversely correlated with the severity of negative symptoms at entry into the trial. Two clozapine-treated patients were withdrawn from the study, one because of leukopenia and nausea, and the other because of vomiting and hypotension. Chlorpromazine treatment was prematurely discontinued in two patients, because of jaundice and over sedation in one, and because of severe weight loss in the other (9 kg). The rate of moderate-to-severe sialorrhea was high in clozapine-treated patients (28.6%). Two clozapine-treated patients and two chlorpromazine-treated patients showed significant improvement in previously existing tardive dyskinesia and one chlorpromazine-treated patient exhibited aggravation of tardive dyskinesia. The results of this study indicate that clozapine treatment might have advantages over chlorpromazine for Chinese schizophrenic patients who are refractory to typical neuroleptic treatment.     

Clinical and theoretical implications of 5-HT2 and D2 receptor occupancy of clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy measurements provide a valid predictor of antipsychotic response, extrapyramidal side effects, and elevation of prolactin levels. The new antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine obtain antipsychotic response with few extrapyramidal side effects and little prolactin elevation. The purpose of this study was to compare the D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 receptor occupancies of these drugs in patients receiving multiple-dose, steady-state regimens. METHOD: Forty-four patients with schizophrenia (16 taking risperidone, 2-12 mg/day; 17 taking olanzapine, 5-60 mg/day; and 11 taking clozapine, 75-900 mg/day) had their D2 and 5-HT2 occupancies determined with the use of [11C]raclopride and [18F]setoperone, respectively, and positron emission tomography imaging. RESULTS: Clozapine showed a much lower D2 occupancy (16%-68%) than risperidone (63%-89%) and olanzapine (43%-89%). Risperidone and olanzapine gave equal D2 occupancies at doses of 5 and 20 mg/day, respectively. All three drugs showed greater 5-HT2 than D2 occupancy at all doses, although the difference was greatest for clozapine. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine, at doses known to be effective in routine clinical settings, showed a D2 occupancy clearly lower than that of typical antipsychotics, while risperidone and olanzapine at their usual clinical doses gave the same level of D2 occupancy as low-dose typical antipsychotics. The results also suggest that some previous clinical comparisons of antipsychotics may have been confounded by different levels of D2 occupancy. Clinical comparisons of these drugs, matching for D2 occupancy, may provide a better measure of their true "atypicality" and will help in understanding the contribution of non-D2 receptors to antipsychotic effects.     

A pharmacokinetic interaction between carbamazepine and olanzapine: observations on possible mechanism

OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic, which is effective against both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and causes fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than conventional antipsychotics. The purpose of the present study was to assess the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between olanzapine and carbamazepine, since these agents are likely to be used concomitantly in the treatment of manic psychotic disorder. METHOD: The pharmacokinetics of two single therapeutic doses of olanzapine were determined in 11 healthy volunteers. The first dose of olanzapine (10 mg) was taken alone and the second dose (10 mg) after 2 weeks of treatment with carbamazepine (200 mg BID). Measurement of urinary 6beta-hydroxycortisol/cortisol excretion was used as an endogenous marker to confirm that induction of CYP3A4 by carbamazepine had occurred. RESULTS: The dose of olanzapine given after a 2-week pretreatment with carbamazepine was cleared more rapidly than olanzapine given alone. Olanzapine pharmacokinetic values for Cmax and AUC were significantly lower after the second dose, the elimination half-life was significantly shorter, and the clearance and volume of distribution were significantly increased. CONCLUSION: Carbamazepine has been shown to induce several P450 cytochromes including CYP3A4 and CYP1A2. Since CYP1A2 plays a role in the metabolic clearance of olanzapine, the interaction may be attributed to induction of CYP1A2 by carbamazepine, leading to increased first-pass and systemic metabolism of olanzapine. The interaction is not considered to be of clinical significance because olanzapine has a wide therapeutic index, and the changes in plasma concentration of olanzapine are within the fourfold variation that occurs without concern for safety in a patient population.     

Transcultural differences in illness behaviour and clinical outcome: an underestimated aspect of general practice?

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic effective in the treatment of schizophrenic patients. After a 2- to 9-day placebo lead-in, 79 inpatients with schizophrenia according to DSM-III-R criteria were placed on an olanzapine dosage of 10 mg/day or 1 mg/day for up to 6 weeks. Blood samples were obtained weekly during this period. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale rating scale data suggested a minimum effective therapeutic concentration of 9 ng/mL. Using an intent-to treat analysis, 45% of the patients with olanzapine plasma concentrations > or = 9.3 ng/mL responded (> or = 20% decrease in BPRS), whereas only 13% of the patients with concentrations < 9.3 ng/mL responded. Use of olanzapine plasma concentrations of > 9 ng/mL as a predictor for treatment response in acutely ill schizophrenic patients is practicable because this therapeutic marker significantly increases the likelihood of a patient responding to olanzapine.     

Use of risperidone in pervasive developmental disorders: a case series

A series of 14 children and adolescents (ages 9-17 years, 10 males) were treated with risperidone for pervasive developmental disorder. The rationale for using an atypical neuroleptic agent is based on its ability to target both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It was postulated that symptoms similar to the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia may be observed in the pervasive developmental disorders and might respond favorably to risperidone. Twelve of the 14 youths had been treated previously with several psychotropic drugs, often concurrently. Risperidone was initiated at a starting dose of 0.25 mg twice daily and increased in 0.25 mg/day increments every 5-7 days. Optimal dosages ranged from 0.75 to 1.5 mg daily in divided doses. Thirteen of the 14 youths appeared to benefit from risperidone. Improvement in functionality on the Children's Global Assessment Scale was demonstrated in 13 of 14 cases. Disruptive behaviors, when present, markedly decreased on risperidone. Ten patients showed a marked reduction in agitation and anxiety. Social awareness improved markedly in 10 patients, moderately in 3, and only slightly in 1. All but 1 patient demonstrated a lessening in obsessional behaviors. Effects on attention were uniformly positive. Side effects were minimal at the dosages used in this study; 5 patients had initial sedation. Neither extrapyramidal side effects nor agitation was observed in any case. Ten of 14 youths could be managed with risperidone monotherapy. During the follow-up period (mean 7 months), none of the patients experienced a major relapse while taking risperidone. Positive and negative symptoms, as typically characterized in schizophrenia, were both found to improve equally well with risperidone treatment. Based on these findings, a prospective clinical trial with a randomized controlled design is warranted.     

Quetiapine: a new atypical antipsychotic

Quetiapine has recently been approved for treatment of psychotic disorders. In short term (6 weeks) trials this atypical antipsychotic was shown to be as efficacious as the standard antipsychotics for the treatment of the positive symptoms of schizophrenia without causing any extrapyramidal symptoms or increase in the prolactin levels. Its efficacy for treating the negative symptoms was variable. Preliminary observations suggest its potential to improve the cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. It is metabolized by the p450 CYP 3A4 system with an estimated elimination half life of 6 hours. The optimal treatment is 300 mg to 400 mg/day in two to three divided oral doses. The most common side effects include dizziness, hypotension, somnolence and weight gain. Changes in the ECG, the thyroid hormone and hepatic enzymes levels appear to be clinically insignificant. Quetiapine interacts with phenytoin, carbamazepine, barbiturates, rifampin and glucocorticoids; and coadministration with these drugs may require dosage adjustment. Doses need not be adjusted when fluoxetine, imipramine, haloperidol and resperidone are coadministered. Quetiapine may enhance the effects of antihypertensive agents and may antagonize those of levodopa and dopamine. Long term efficacy of quetiapine has not been determined. Also undetermined are its effectiveness for treating the first episode and treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Data suggest that quetiapine may be used for the management of psychotic disorders in patients who may not tolerate the side effects of the typical antipsychotics and clozapine. It may also be helpful in patients whose psychotic manifestations did not adequately respond to risperidone and olanzapine.     

Therapeutic implications of microglia activation by lipopolysaccharide and reactive oxygen species generation in septic shock and central nervous system pathologies: a review

OBJECTIVE: Olanzapine, a potent 5-HT2a/2c, dopamine D1D2D4 antagonist with anticholinergic activity, has a profile of known receptor affinity similar to that of clozapine. This pilot study examined the efficacy of olanzapine for treatment-refractory childhood-onset schizophrenia in eight patients who had received 8-week open-label trials. For comparison, data are included from 15 patients who had received 6-week open-label clozapine trials using identical rating instruments (largely by the same raters) in the same treatment setting. METHOD: Twenty-three children and adolescents with an onset of DSM-III-R schizophrenia by age 12 for whom at least two different typical neuroleptics had been ineffective participated in the two separate studies. Some of the patients were intolerant of clozapine, although it had been effective (n = 4). Patients receiving olanzapine were evaluated over 8 weeks with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Improvement. RESULTS: For the eight patients who received olanzapine trials, at week 8 there was a 17% improvement in the BPRS total score, a 27% improvement in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and a 1% improvement in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, relative to "ideal" admission status on typical neuroleptics. In contrast, the magnitude of the effect sizes for each of the clinical ratings was larger at week 6 of the previous clozapine trial than for an 8-week olanzapine trial, relative to admission status on typical neuroleptics. For the four children who had received both clozapine and olanzapine, BPRS total scores were significantly lower at week 6 of clozapine treatment compared with week 6 of olanzapine treatment (p = .03). CONCLUSION: These data provide preliminary evidence for the efficacy of olanzapine for some children and adolescents with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, but they also suggest the need for a more rigorous double-blind comparison of these two atypical antipsychotics.     

Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced growth suppression with growth hormone. National Cooperative Growth Study

Growth failure is common during long term treatment with glucocorticoids (GC) due to blunting of GH release, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) bioactivity, and collagen synthesis. These effects could theoretically be reversed with GH therapy. The National Cooperative Growth Study database (n = 22,005) was searched for children meeting the following criteria: 1) pharmacological treatment with GC and GH for more than 12 months, 2) known type and dose of GC, and 3) height measurements for more than 12 months. A total of 83 patients were identified. Monitoring of glucose, insulin, IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3, type 1 procollagen, osteocalcin, and glycosylated hemoglobin levels was performed in a subset of patients. Stimulated endogenous GH levels were less than 10 microg/L in 51% of patients and less than 7 microg/L in 37% of patients. The mean GC dose, expressed as prednisone equivalents, was 0.5 +/- 0.6 mg/kg day. Baseline evaluation revealed extreme short stature (mean height SD score = -3.7 +/- 1.2), delayed skeletal maturation (mean delay, 3.1 yr), and slowed growth rates (mean, 3.0 +/- 2.5 cm/yr). After 12 months of GH therapy (mean dose, 0.29 mg/kg x weeks), mean growth rate increased to 6.3 +/- 2.6 cm/yr, and height SD score improved by 0.21 +/- 0.4 (P < 0.01). During the second year of GH therapy (n = 44), the mean growth rate was 6.3 +/- 2.0 cm/yr. Prednisone equivalent dose and growth response to GH therapy were negatively correlated (r = -0.264; P < 0.05). Plasma concentrations of IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3, procollagen, osteocalcin, and glycosylated hemoglobin increased with GH therapy, whereas glucose and insulin levels did not change. The following conclusions were reached. The growth-suppressing effects of GC are counterbalanced by GH therapy; the mean response is a doubling of baseline growth rate. Responsiveness to GH is negatively correlated with GC dose. Glycosylated hemoglobin levels increased slightly, but glucose and insulin levels were not altered by GH therapy.     

Clozapine and olanzapine treatment decreases rat cortical and limbic GABA(A) receptors

The density of GABA(A) receptors in the hippocampus and the temporal cortex from rats treated for 28 days with either haloperidol, chlorpromazine, clozapine or olanzapine was measured. Compared to haloperidol (0.01 and 0.1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) and chlorpromazine (0.1 and 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)), clozapine and olanzapine (0.1 and 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) markedly decreased the density of GABA(A) receptors in these two brain regions. These data suggest that modulation of GABAergic transmission could be an important action of some antipsychotic drugs.     

Similarity of clozapine's and olanzapine's acute effects on rats' lapping behavior

As a way of further comparing the behavioral effects of clozapine and olanzapine, dose ranges of these drugs were studied in a task emphasizing fine motor detail of rats' tongue movements during lapping behavior. Rats lapped drops of tap water from a force-sensing disk. From this behavior four variables were derived: peak-force of tongue strikes, duration of tongue contact, number of separate tongue contacts in 2 min, and the rhythm of the lapping behavior as quantified by Fourier analysis. Both clozapine (0.5-4.0 mg/kg, IP, 45 min) and olanzapine (0.25-2.0 mg/kg, IP, 45 min) dose dependently reduced all four measures of behavior. With respect to lick rhythm, a behavioral marker which clearly distinguishes haloperidol from clozapine in this behavioral paradigm, olanzapine was about twice as potent as clozapine, with the two drugs having parallel dose-effect functions. Within-session decrements in behavior previously reported for haloperidol in the lick task were not produced by clozapine nor by olanzapine. Taken together, these data strengthen the idea that the behavioral effects of clozapine and olanzapine are strikingly similar, and thereby emphasize the potential of olanzapine as an atypical anti-psychotic agent.     

A clinical trial of escalating doses of flumazenil for reversal of suspected benzodiazepine overdose in the emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if flumazenil, when used in doses higher than those currently recommended, could reverse the effects of a benzodiazepine (BDZ) overdose in patients who might not otherwise respond and whether the higher dose was associated with increased adverse effects. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, balanced, with parallel groups. Open-label flumazenil administration was available if a patient failed to respond or became resedated. SETTING: Sixteen emergency departments in the United States. POPULATION: Patients presenting to the ED with clinically significant signs and symptoms of a known or suspected BDZ overdose. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 10 mL/min of placebo or flumazenil (1 mg/10 mL) each minute for ten minutes. If there was no response, up to 3 mg of open-label flumazenil could be administered. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 170 patients enrolled, 87 received flumazenil and 83 received placebo. The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable. Ten minutes after the beginning of study drug infusion, patients were evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC), and Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (NAS). The mean +/- SD CGIS score at ten minutes for BDZ-positive patients was 1.41 +/- 0.72 for patients who received flumazenil and 3.41 +/- 0.91 for the placebo group (P < .01). There was no difference in the mean CGIS score between the flumazenil (3.25 +/- 1.15) and placebo (3.75 +/- 0.69) groups in BDZ-negative patients. The GCS and NAS were also significantly better in patients who were BDZ-positive and received flumazenil. The mean +/- SD dose of flumazenil administered during the double-blind phase was 71.3 +/- 34.2 mL (7.13 mg) compared with 95.06 +/- 16.03 mL of placebo. Of the 39 patients who had BDZ-positive drug screens and received flumazenil, 29 (74%) responded to 3 mg or less. Six additional patients responded to 4 or 5 mg, and one patient responded to 8 mg. The most common adverse effects in patients who received flumazenil were injection site pain (10.3%), agitation (8%), vomiting (3.4%), dizziness (3.4%), headache (3.4%), tachycardia (3.4%), and crying (3.4%). Three patients developed seizures. Two were associated with significant tricyclic antidepressant overdoses and one with propoxyphene ingestion. Two patients had positive drug screens for BDZ. CONCLUSION: Flumazenil rapidly and effectively reverses the clinical signs and symptoms of a BDZ overdose. Most patients will respond to 3 mg or less, but a small number may require a higher dose for reversal of clinical symptoms. Patients with concomitant tricyclic antidepressant overdose may be at risk for developing seizures.     

Environmental ways forward in a postmodern (nursing) world

Anticholinergic treatment of neuroleptic extrapyramidal movement disorders (EPS) has been associated with induction of tardive dyskinesia. Also an increasing abuse of anticholinergics by schizophrenic patients is noted. Since as early as 1976, positive effects of amantadine (AMA) on neuroleptic EPS have been described, therefore a controlled study of these reports seemed worthwhile. Forty-two schizophrenic patients (of which 7 were dropouts) of three centers entered the study and were treated for EPS in a double-blind design: 18 (11 m, 7 f) with AMA and 17 (8 m, 9 f) with biperiden (BIP). Identical preparations of AMA 100 mg, tid) and BIP (2 mg, tid) were used in treatment of haloperidol-induced EPS (AMA, mean 22.4 mg haloperidol; BIP, mean 19.6 mg haloperidol). Effects of treatment and possible side effects were rated: EPS for the intensity of EPS, BPRS for quantification of psychotic symptoms, FSUCL for rating the side effects and KUSTA to document patients' mood. Ratings were recorded on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 and at discontinuation, respectively. All patients were treated with haloperidol and levomepromazine (for tranquilization/sleep induction) and the respective antiparkinsonian agent for 14 days. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly in either groups. In the AMA treatment group, 2 patients dropped out for noncompliance, in the BIP group, 5 (3 no effect, 1 noncompliance, 1 agitation). All results as recorded with the different rating instruments showed a significant (p < 0.01) overall improvement, whereas no significant differences between treatment groups could be determined, notably the treatment effect of both drugs on EPS was similar. Thus, the application of AMA in cases of neuroleptic EPS seems justified and is a useful alternative of anticholinergic drugs. Certain advantageous aspects of AMA treatment of EPS with regard to the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and tardive dyskinesia are discussed.     

Haloperidol serum concentrations and D2 dopamine receptor occupancy during low-dose treatment with haloperidol decanoate

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between serum concentrations of haloperidol and central D2 receptor occupancy in eight schizophrenic patients treated with low doses of haloperidol decanoate. The accompanying psychopathology was assessed. During a 4-week interval after administration of haloperidol decanoate (dose range 30-70 mg), serum concentrations of haloperidol were determined once a week by using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography method. The patients' D2 receptor occupancy was determined with single-photon emission computed tomography on two separate occasions. One week after depot administration the mean haloperidol serum concentration was 7.3 nmol/l (range 3.9-22.7 nmol/l) and the mean D2 receptor occupancy was 75% (range 52-100%). After 4 weeks the mean haloperidol serum concentration had decreased to 1.8 nmol/l (range 0-5.7 nmol/l) and the mean D2 receptor occupancy to 53% (range 12-89%). Differences were seen in two subgroups, defined by their history of neuroleptic exposure before inclusion into the study. Patients treated with depots of haloperidol decanoate for months showed higher D2 receptor occupancy and corresponding higher serum haloperidol concentrations at week 4 than did patients who had a history of oral haloperidol treatment. Because the difference in the dynamics of D2 receptor occupancy could be reflected by corresponding serum concentrations of haloperidol, it seems useful to involve haloperidol drug monitoring as a possible surrogate marker for D2 receptor occupancy in optimizing low-dose treatment with haloperidol decanoate.