Use of oral and intravenous ondansetron in patients treated with cisplatin

Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 antagonist, has been shown to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. From July and August 1991, 25 patients were accrued in a phase II study to assess the efficacy of ondansetron in patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2, given either as a 24-hour infusion on day 1 or in divided doses as eight-hour infusions daily on days 1 to 3. Each patient received 24 mg of ondansetron per day for six days. Intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg was given daily on the days of cisplatin infusion. The emetic episodes and degree of nausea were evaluated daily. "Good" control of emesis (0-2 episodes of vomiting) and nausea (mild or no nausea) ranged from 64-100% and 88-100% respectively. Failure in emesis control occurred most frequently on days 3 and 4. Ondansetron was generally well tolerated with only minimal side-effects. One patient developed unexplained encephalopathy which resolved completely. Our results suggest that ondansetron is an effective anti-emetic agent with minimal toxicities. Randomised studies comparing ondansetron against "standard" anti-emetics should be conducted.     

Oral ondansetron for the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis: a large, multicenter, double-blind, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron versus placebo

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis in patients who do not require rescue antiemetic therapy for acute emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy (> or = 70 mg/m2), and who were not rescued for acute emesis, were eligible to be randomized to receive one of the three oral regimens to control delayed emesis. Group I received placebo on days 2 to 6; group II received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 and 3 and placebo on days 4 to 6; group III received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 6. All patients received intravenous ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours for three doses) for the control of acute emesis on day 1. The number of emetic episodes on days 2 and 3 combined (days 2/3, when incidence and severity of delayed emesis were expected to be greatest) was considered the primary measure of efficacy. RESULTS: Patients who received odansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes on days 2/3, 4, and 5 than those who received placebo (P < or = .002 on each day). Additionally, significantly more patients who received ondansetron had a complete plus major response (C+MR; < or = two two emetic episodes) than those who received placebo on days 2/3 (56% v 37%, P = .001), 4 (94% v 85%, P = .005), and 5 (98% v 88%, P = .006). Patients who received ondansetron had significantly less nausea on day 2/3 when day-1 nausea was used as the baseline score (P = .025). Patients who received ondansetron also had significantly less nausea on day 4 (P = .042) and the results approached significance on day 5 (P = .066). CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron had a significant effect in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea in patients who had not required rescue antiemetics during the acute emesis period. The control of delayed nausea and vomiting was most notable in the immediate 2 days following cisplatin administration, with the clinical difference narrowing between the two treatment arms on subsequent days.     

Early neuropsychological impairment in HIV-seropositive intravenous drug users: evidence from the Italian Multicentre Neuropsychological HIV Study

The purpose of this study was to document the emetogenic potential of intrathecal chemotherapy (IC) in children and to evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron in reducing nausea and vomiting with this chemotherapy treatment. Patients less than 18 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukemia were eligible to participate in a survey project measuring the emetogenic potential of various chemotherapy treatments. Patients surveyed for 1 or more IC treatments were included in this report. The IC consisted of methotrexate, hydrocortisone and cytarabine, dosed according to patient age. A nausea/vomiting survey instrument was completed by each patient and/or parent following IC treatment. The instrument rated nausea, vomiting and daily activity interference (DAI) on a 4-point scale of 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe, and collected data on the number of vomiting and/or retching episodes in addition to the child's appetite following the chemotherapy treatment. When ondansetron was employed, it was administered in an i.v. infusion at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg before and after chemotherapy or as an oral dose of 4 mg or 8 mg before chemotherapy. Courses of IC without antiemetics were analyzed to determine the emetogenic potential of IC. For patients receiving IC both with and without ondansetron, courses were compared with each patient used as their own control to determine the influence of ondansetron upon survey responses. Statistical analysis consisted of nonparametric Friedman 2-way ANOVA for ordinal variables and a paired t-test for continuous variables. The binomial test was employed to analyze for differences between ondansetron and no antiemetic in the number of patients with complete control of both nausea and vomiting or vomiting alone. A total of 63 children with a mean age of 7.6 +/- 4.2 years were each studied on one or more occasions. Thirty-seven children were surveyed for 87 IC treatments without antiemetics (group I), and 17 children from this group were surveyed for 48 IC courses with i.v. ondansetron (group IA). An additional 18 children were subsequently surveyed for 39 IC courses with i.v. ondansetron (group II). Fifteen patients (7 of whom were members of group I) were surveyed following 33 IC courses with oral ondansetron (group III). The survey scores for group I patients were: nausea severity 1.3 +/- 1.1, vomiting severity 1.2 +/- 1.1, DAI 1.2 +/- 1.0 and mean number of emetic episodes 4.7 +/- 8.4. The mean appetite score was 1.5 +/- 1.1. For patients in group IA, nausea severity (0.8 +/- 0.9), vomiting severity (0.5 +/- 0.8), DAI (0.7 +/- 0.8), and the number of emetic episodes (1.4 +/- 2.8) were all significantly lower than with prior IC treatments without ondansetron. For complete protection, children receiving i.v. ondansetron had greater complete protection rates from both nausea and vomiting or vomiting alone than did patients receiving no antiemetic. Survey responses were also lower for patients receiving oral ondansetron, but insufficient control data did not allow for statistical analysis. IC results in mild to moderate nausea and vomiting in children. The emetogenic potential of IC is significantly reduced by i.v. ondansetron.     

Treatment of cisplatin-related nausea and vomiting with a combination of ondansetron and metoclopramide: a pilot study

Forty chemotherapy-naive patients receiving high-dose cisplatin were included in a pilot study of a combination of ondansetron plus metoclopramide as antiemetic therapy. Patients received ondansetron 16 mg plus metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg in 250 cm3 of normal saline i.v. 15 min before cisplatin administration on day 1; then ondansetron 8 mg was given orally b.i.d. and metoclopramide 0.5 mg/kg was given intramuscularly t.i.d. for 4 days. This combination was given to all patients receiving the first cycle of chemotherapy. At the second cycle of chemotherapy all patients received the same antiemetic treatment as above plus methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. on day 1 and the intramuscularly once a day for 4 days. There were 20 females and 20 males with a mean performance status of 1 (range 0-2) and a mean age of 58 years (range 36-68). Ten patients had ovarian carcinoma, eight patients had uterine adenocarcinoma and 22 and non-small cell lung carcinoma. The mean cisplatin dose was 96 mg/m2. All patients denied significant alcohol consumption. At cycle 1, complete protection against acute emesis was achieved in 22 patients (55%), major protection in 12 cases (30%), minor protection in four patients (10%) and failure in two cases (5%). On the other hand, the efficacy of this combination on delayed vomiting was not striking. For delayed vomiting, complete protection was observed in nine patients (23%), major protection in 13 cases (33%), minor protection in 10 patients (25%) and failure in eight cases (20%). At cycle 2, patients also received methylprednisolone showing complete protection from vomiting in 19 cases (47%) and major protection on 12 cases (30%). Results achieved with ondansetron plus metoclopramide are in the range reported for ondansetron alone in the medical literature. Although this study was not prospectively carried out in a randomized fashion, the results are not suggestive of a possible positive effect of metoclopramide addition to ondansetron. On the other hand, these results stress the role that corticosteroids may play in the control of delayed emesis. Toxicity was predictable and the frequency of side-effects was in the range reported in other studies with ondansetron.     

Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis

This multinational, multicentre, randomised, parallel-group study compared the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ondansetron 8 mg orally twice a day with ondansetron suppository 16 mg once daily in patients receiving cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy. A total of 406 patients were randomised to receive ondansetron 8 mg p.o. (198 patients) or ondansetron suppository (208 patients) medication in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. The primary efficacy analysis revealed that ondansetron provided good anti-emetic control with 81% of patients in the 8 mg p.o. b.d. group and 73% of patients in the 16 mg ondansetron suppository o.d. group experiencing complete or major control of emesis (< or = 2 emetic episodes) on the worst day of days 1-3. The 90% confidence interval for the difference between the two treatments for complete or major control (1.4, 15.0%) showed that the treatments could be regarded as equivalent. A difference in favour of oral ondansetron treatment was noted for the complete control (0 emetic episodes) rates over days 1-3, but no differences were found on day 1. There were no significant differences in the distribution of nausea grades between the treatment groups on the worst day of days 1-3 or on day 1. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two treatment groups, the most frequently reported events were headache and constipation. There were no significant laboratory findings in either treatment group. In conclusion this study showed that the ondansetron treatments could be regarded as equivalent for the primary efficacy endpoint and that ondansetron suppository was well tolerated and effective in the prevention of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis.     

Homoharringtonine in combination with cytarabine for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia

Homoharringtonine (HHT) is one of several cephalotaxine alkaloids that has shown clinical efficacy in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In a phase I trial we evaluated cytarabine 100 mg/m2 by continuous infusion daily for 7 days in combination with four dose levels of HHT ranging from 1.5-5 mg/m2 by continuous infusion daily for 7 days to see if an effective regimen could be developed. Twenty-two patients with relapsed and/or primary refractory AML were treated. Seventeen males and five females were treated, with a median age of 40 years (range 19-63). There were five remissions in 14 patients with relapsed AML and none of eight responders in patients with primary refractory AML. None of the three patients treated at 1.5 mg/m2 dose level of HHT responded. Of three patients treated at the 3 mg/m2 dose level, there was one complete remission. At both 4 mg/m2 and 5 mg/m2, two of eight patients achieved complete remission. Four of the five remissions occurred in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Drug induced pancytopenia was universal, and hypotension and fluid retention were more common at the higher dose levels. Other toxicity was mild and included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis. No significant hepatic, renal, or cardiac toxicity was seen. We conclude that the dose of HHT 4 mg/m2 for 7 days by continuous infusion in combination with cytarabine is safe for patients with AML; and this combination is appropriate for a phase II evaluation.     

Immunoglobulin production by human peripheral B cells against Staphylococcus aureus

Patterns of antiemetic therapy and its outcomes in patients undergoing high-dose antineoplastic therapy were studied. The study, conducted at a cancer center, included both a retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing highly emetogenic high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem-cell rescue between November 1994 and December 1995 and a concurrent evaluation of patients treated between January and May 1996. During the study period the recommended antiemetic regimen for highly emetogenic chemotherapy was a single dose of granisetron 1 mg i.v. daily 30 minutes before treatment on days of chemotherapy. Severity of nausea and vomiting during both the acute phase (from day 1 of chemotherapy to 24 hours after its completion) and delayed phase (from 24 hours to five days after the end of chemotherapy) was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Grading Scale. A total of 59 patients were evaluable; 41 were reviewed retrospectively, and 18 were reviewed concurrently. On day 1 of the acute phase, 53 patients (90%) had no vomiting and 51 patients (86%) had no nausea. The frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting increased on successive acute-phase days, and it was necessary to add other antiemetics. Nausea and vomiting continued to be significant problems throughout the delayed phase; 32 (54%) of the patients had a maximum of grade 3 nausea, and 29 patients (49%) had a maximum of grade 2 vomiting. Substantial numbers of patients who received selective serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists before high-dose antineoplastic agents had significant nausea and vomiting that required the addition of other antiemetics.     

Tropisetron or ondansetron compared with placebo for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, the efficacy of prophylactic tropisetron (2 mg) or ondansetron (4 mg) for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting after abdominal or non-abdominal surgery with general balanced anaesthesia was studied in 842 ASA I-III patients. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, ondansetron and tropisetron reduced the frequency of emetic episodes compared with the placebo (29%, 30% vs. 42% respectively). In men, neither tropisetron nor ondansetron had an effect different from the placebo, whereas in women both drugs led to lower rates of emetic episodes and nausea. In comparison with abdominal surgery, fewer patients in the non-abdominal surgery subgroup had emetic episodes (42% vs. 23% in the placebo group). However, neither tropisetron nor ondansetron was significantly different from the placebo in this patient subgroup. In conclusion, for patients at increased risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting, a prophylactic therapy at the lowest effective dose with tropisetron or ondansetron may be useful.     

What is core? Guidelines for the core curriculum in paediatrics

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was investigated in order to compare on 3 days the efficacy and the safety of the 16 mg once a day (od) ondansetron suppository (suppository group) with the recommended ondansetron treatment, i.e. 8 mg intravenous (i.v.) ondansetron on day 1 followed by 8 mg tablet (p.o.) twice daily (i.v. + p.o. group) on days 2 and 3 in patients receiving cisplatin (> or = 50 mg/m2) containing chemotherapy. In the 420 patients included in the intent-to-treat population, 209 received the 16 mg suppository and 211 the i.v. + p.o. treatment. The number of emetic episodes and the nausea score were recorded each day. Concerning the primary criterion, both treatments provided good anti-emetic control with 87% of all patients having a complete or major response (0-2 emetic episodes) on day 1 in the suppository group and 92% in the i.v. + p.o. group (P = 0.058). The 90% confidence interval for the difference between the two treatments for complete or major control was included in the interval (-15%, 15%) and showed that the treatment groups could be regarded as equivalent. Small differences in favour of the i.v. + p.o. group were observed concerning the secondary parameters. Both treatments were well tolerated. The results of this study show that both treatments are equivalent in the prevention of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy induced emesis for the primary efficacy criteria and that the ondansetron suppository is efficient and well tolerated and is a suitable alternative to the anti-emetic treatment combining the intravenous and oral routes.     

CNS glia are targets for GDNF and neurturin

Carboplatin is one of the most common drugs used for radiochemotherapy of cancer. However, the best way to combine the drug with fractionated radiotherapy has not been established. In the present study the authors investigated which maximum tolerated daily bolus dose of carboplatin would allow safe radiopotentiation for 10 consecutive radiotherapy days, the scheme being repeated twice during the 6 weeks that a conventional radiotherapy scheme lasts. Seventy-two patients with lung or pelvis malignancies were included in a dose escalation study. Twenty-four patients comprised the first baseline cohort and were treated with radiotherapy alone. The daily dose of carboplatin was escalated starting from 38 mg/m2 daily (for 10 days) and increasing by 7 mg/m2 per day. Six patients were to be included in each cohort. All 12 patients treated at the 38 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 dose level completed two cycles of 10-day carboplatin treatment with no grade III-IV toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor effectively averted the incidence of neutropenia and allowed the administration of the second carboplatin 10-day cycle in five of six patients at the 52 mg/m2 daily dose level. Platelet grade III-IV toxicity was observed in all 12 patients (six supported with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and six with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and recombinant human erythropoietin) treated at the 59 mg/m2 daily dose level and none of them received the second cycle of chemotherapy. Twelve patients were treated at the same dose level using amifostine 500 mg before carboplatin infusion. Two patients interrupted chemotherapy because of severe nausea and vomiting. Nine of 10 who accomplished the 10-day treatment had platelet levels more than 90,000/microl on day 28 and completed the second 10-day cycle without severe toxicity. Acute radiation toxicity did not increase in the carboplatin cohorts. In this study the authors established a high-dose fractionated carboplatin schedule that can be safely administered during radical radiotherapy.     

Control of emesis by intravenous granisetron in breast cancer patients treated with 5-FU, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide

Granisetron, a potent and selective 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was reported to be an effective antiemetic agent both in animal studies and in patients given highly emetogenic chemotherapy. A sample of 43 patients with breast cancer was accrued from September to November 1992 in a phase II study to assess the efficacy of granisetron in patients receiving FEC (5-FU, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide). Each patient received 3 mg intravenous granisetron as a single dose just prior to chemotherapy. Oral metoclopromide was prescribed to each patient as a rescue anti-emetic. The emetic episodes and degree of nausea were evaluated on a daily basis. Good control of emesis (0-2 episodes of vomiting) and nausea (mild or no nausea) was in the range 77%-98% and 77%-93% respectively. There was a complete response (no emetic episodes throughout the 6-day period) in 16 patients (37.2%). Onset of emesis tends to occur on day 1 and tend to subside after day 3; 85% of patients had onset of emesis in the first 2 days after chemotherapy. Control of emesis and nausea tends to improve after day 3, which could be the result of the reduced emetogenicity of the combination FEC with time. Altogether, 77% had good control of acute emesis; control of delayed emesis was better with 84% achieving a major response on day 2 after chemotherapy, which improved to more than 90% after day 4. Granisetron was generally tolerated with headache being the most common side-effect followed by constipation and flushing. This study suggests that granisetron is an effective and well-tolerated anti-emetic agent, which deserves randomised trials to elucidate its efficacy further.     

Computer simulation of changes in nursing productivity from early tracheal extubation of coronary artery bypass graft patients

A total of 530 patients were treated in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study to compare the anti-emetic efficacy and safety of a once daily ondansetron oral regimen with a once daily i.v. dosing regimen over a 24 h period, administered to patients prior to receiving cisplatin (50 mg/m2 or greater) chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single dose of ondansetron plus dexamethasone given either orally (ondansetron 24 mg and dexamethasone 12 mg, n=262) or i.v. (ondansetron 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg, n=268). Complete control of emesis (i.e. no emetic episodes, no rescue and no premature withdrawal) was achieved for 85% of patients (224 of 262) in the oral group and 83% (223 of 268) in the i.v. group. No nausea was reported in 70% of patients in the oral group and 68% in the i.v. group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for any of the assessments of efficacy, which included time to first emetic episode, number of emetic episodes and the worst grade of nausea occurring over the 24 h study period. Once daily ondansetron oral and i.v., in combination with dexamethasone, was well tolerated in this study. In conclusion, once daily oral ondansetron 24 mg plus dexamethasone is equally effective in the control of emesis and nausea induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy as once daily ondansetron 8 mg i.v. plus dexamethasone.     

Intensive postremission chemotherapy in adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B

BACKGROUND: About 65 percent of previously untreated adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) enter complete remission when treated with cytarabine and an anthracycline. However, such responses are rarely durable when conventional postremission therapy is administered. Uncontrolled trials have suggested that intensive postremission therapy may prolong these complete remissions. METHODS: We treated 1088 adults with newly diagnosed AML with three days of daunorubicin and seven days of cytarabine and randomly assigned patients who had a complete remission to receive four courses of cytarabine at one of three doses: 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for five days by continuous infusion, 400 mg per square meter per day for five days by continuous infusion, or 3 g per square meter in a 3-hour infusion every 12 hours (twice daily) on days 1, 3, and 5. All patients then received four courses of monthly maintenance treatment. RESULTS: Of the 693 patients who had a complete remission, 596 were randomly assigned to receive postremission cytarabine. After a median follow-up of 52 months, the disease-free survival rates in the three treatment groups were significantly different (P = 0.003). Relative to the 100-mg group, the hazard ratios were 0.67 for the 3-g group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.86) and 0.75 for the 400-mg group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.94). The probability of remaining in continuous complete remission after four years for patients 60 years of age or younger was 24 percent in the 100-mg group, 29 percent in the 400-mg group, and 44 percent in the 3-g group (P = 0.002). In contrast, for patients older than 60, the probability of remaining disease-free after four years was 16 percent or less in each of the three postremission cytarabine groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the concept of a dose-response effect for cytarabine in patients with AML who are 60 years of age or younger. The results with the high-dose schedule in this age group are comparable to those reported in similar patients who have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplantation during a first remission.     

Efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron versus prochlorperazine in the prevention of emesis associated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy and maintenance of health-related quality of life

This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of oral ondansetron (8 mg twice daily [BID] for up to 3 days) with those of phenothiazine prochlorperazine (10 mg BID for up to 3 days) in 133 cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. In addition, the study evaluated the impact of these treatments on patients' health-related quality of life, measured with both the Functional Living Index--Cancer and the Functional Living Index--Emesis questionnaires. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic at their request or if the investigator deemed it necessary. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of patients with no emetic episodes over the 3-day study period: 60% in the ondansetron group compared with 21% in the prochlorperazine group. Twenty-five percent of ondansetron-treated patients compared with 68% of prochlorperazine-treated patients experienced three or more emetic episodes, rescue medication use, or withdrawal from the study due to adverse events or lack of efficacy of the study drug. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was significantly longer (13 hours and 37 minutes) in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group (9 hours and 30 minutes). Nausea and appetite scores did not differ significantly between groups. The score on the vomiting subscale of the Functional Living Index--Emesis was significantly more favorable in the ondansetron group compared with the prochlorperazine group, indicating better maintenance of health-related quality of life in ondansetron-treated patients. Both treatments were well tolerated. The most common potentially drug-related adverse event was headache, which occurred in significantly more (16%) ondansetron-treated patients compared with prochlorperazine-treated patients (3%). The results of this study demonstrate that oral ondansetron 8 mg BID for up to 3 days is more effective than prochlorperazine 10 mg BID for up to 3 days in the prevention of emesis associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.     

Successful induction and consolidation therapy of acute myeloid leukaemia in a renal allograft recipient

Immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients have a markedly increased risk of neoplasia. Among these malignancies acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is rare. However, until now no case of successful chemotherapy has been reported. We present a 39-year-old male patient who developed AML (FAB M4 Eo) 4 years after renal transplantation and achieved a stable complete remission after induction therapy with standard dose cytarabine and daunorubicin. Remission duration is now 11 months. At present the transplant is functioning well after two additional courses of consolidation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine combined with mitoxantrone and idarubicine respectively. Cyclosporin A was given during all cycles of chemotherapy. We conclude that intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML following renal transplantation in good performance status is feasible.     

Complete remission in acute promyelocytic leukemia. The advantages of all-trans-retinoic acid compared to conventional chemotherapy

In all of seven patients (six men, one woman; mean age 43 [24-55] years) with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukaemia, treated between 1989 and 1993, complete remission was achieved. In three of these patients, treated between 1989 and 1991, remission was induced with conventional chemotherapy (cytarabine and anthracycline), after this in four patients with all-trans retinoic acid (tretinoin). The seventh patient who had a very rapid increase in leucocytes during tretinoin administration, was as a precaution also given conventional chemotherapy. All seven patients received consolidating chemotherapy with an intensive treatment cycle. Retrospective analysis indicated that induction with tretinoin had marked advantages: quicker regression of the clotting abnormalities (mean of 9 vs 25 days), shorter period of leukopenia (mean of 3.5 vs 30 days), shorter time until complete remission (mean of 38 vs 48 days). There were no specific side effects ascribable to tretinoin. Toxicity after chemotherapy corresponded to WHO grades 2-4. The results indicate that tretinoin markedly reduces the two main risks in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukaemia: bleeding and infection.     

Patients' self-reported functional status after granisetron or ondansetron therapy to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at six cancer centers

Patient functional status after administration of either granisetron or ondansetron to prevent acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) was studied. Pharmacists and nurses from six cancer centers distributed Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaires to 115 outpatients receiving either granisetron or ondansetron for prevention of CINV. The emetogenic potential of each patient's chemotherapy regimen was high, moderately high, or moderate. Immediately before and 72 hours after chemotherapy, each patient rated his or her reaction to each of 18 items on the questionnaire on a 7-point scale. Possible scores ranged from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning. The occurrence of nausea in the granisetron group was 40.0% compared with 43.2% in the ondansetron group; the occurrence of vomiting was 18.8% in the granisetron group and 11.1% in the ondansetron group. Patients who received highly emetogenic chemotherapy had significantly lower scores on the FLIE after chemotherapy than before. Patients with both nausea and vomiting reported a much higher negative impact on functional status after chemotherapy than those with nausea only. The mean prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy FLIE scores were 124.2 and 110.4 for granisetron and 124.9 and 111.9 for ondansetron. Granisetron and ondansetron did not differ significantly in their effect on functional status reported by patients before and 72 hours after receiving cancer chemotherapy.     

Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide

In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The patients received either i.v. ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. The number of patients with no nausea or vomiting in the ondansteron group was 50 (82%) compared with 29 (47%) in the metoclopramide group (P < 0.001). In those patients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondansetron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclude that preoperative prophylactic administration of i.v. ondansetron was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.     

Cardiac sympathetic nerve stimulation enhances cardiovascular performance during hyperkalaemia in the anaesthetized pig

A total of 74 patients with poor risk AML (median age 36.7 years, range 4.5-60.6) received a single course of a regimen including mitoxantrone (6 mg/m2 intravenous bolus daily, days 1 to 6), etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenous over 1 h, daily, days 1 to 6) and intermediate-dose Ara-C (1 g/m2 over 6 h, daily days 1 to 6). 28 patients had failed initial remission induction with daunorubicin and conventional doses of Ara-C, 16 patients had secondary AML and 30 patients had relapsed from initial remission (five within six months, 15 over six months and ten after autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation). Overall 41/74 patients (55%) achieved complete remission, 26 (35%) had resistant disease and seven (10%) died of infection during marrow hypoplasia. A 4-day course of the same regimen was given as consolidation to patients in complete remission. Subsequent antileukemic therapy was individualized. Profound myelosuppression and pancytopenia were universal resulting in fever or documented infections in almost 100% of patient; major hemorrhagic complications occurred in 39% of patients. Extrahematologic toxicity was mild to moderate consisting mostly of nausea and vomiting, oral mucositis and transient liver and cardiac dysfunction. We conclude that the MEC combination chemotherapy program seems to be an effective antileukemic regimen for secondary and advanced AML, with acceptable toxicity.     

Phase II-trial of double-consolidation following intensive induction treatment for improvement of survival in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Thirty-two consecutive, unselected acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) of all FAB-subtypes with a median age of 68 years were treated with intensive induction chemotherapy consisting of one or two cycles of daunorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 1-3 and Ara C 100 mg/m2 as continuous infusion day 1-7. The overall CR rate was 50%, 14/24 (58%) in de novo AML, and 2/8 (25%) with preceding MDS. One patient achieved a PR of 21 months duration, 3 pts died within 7 days of the induction treatment (ED), 6 died during hypoplasia (HD), and 6 remained refractory to 2 cycles of induction. Four pts died after achieving CR. Of the remaining 12 responders, 11 pts received 2 cycles of consolidation consisting of daunorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 1, and Ara C 100 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion day 1-7. No deaths were observed during consolidation. DFS and survival of responders were 7 and 13 months respectively, survival of all pts, responders and non-responders, was 7 months. Large cooperative trials are necessary to identify those elderly pts who may benefit from intensified consolidation treatment.