Effect of long-term treatment with salmeterol on asthma control: a double blind, randomised crossover study

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of adding salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily for six months to current treatment in subjects with asthma who control their inhaled corticosteroid dose according to a management plan. DESIGN: A double blind, randomised crossover study. SETTING: Nottingham. SUBJECTS: 101 subjects with mild or moderate asthma taking at least 200 micrograms twice daily of beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide. INTERVENTIONS: Salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily and placebo for six months each, with a one month washout. Subjects adjusted inhaled steroid dose according to guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reduction in inhaled steroid use, exacerbations of asthma, and use of oral steroids. RESULTS: Data were available for 87 subjects. When compared with placebo salmeterol treatment was associated with a 17% reduction in inhaled steroid use (95% confidence interval 12% to 22%) with no significant difference in the number of subjects who had an exacerbation (placebo 25%, salmeterol 16%) or use of oral steroids. For secondary end points salmeterol treatment was associated with higher morning and evening peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second; a reduction in symptoms, bronchodilator use and airway responsiveness to methacholine; and no effect on serum potassium concentration, 24 hour heart rate, or the final forced expiratory volume in one second achieved during a salbutamol dose-response study. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects who adjusted their inhaled steroid treatment according to guidelines the addition of salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily was associated with a reduction in inhaled steroid use and improved lung function and symptom control.     

Salmeterol xinafoate as maintenance therapy compared with albuterol in patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, with that of albuterol, a short-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist, in the treatment of asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. SETTING: Eleven outpatient clinical centers. SUBJECTS: A total of 322 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with chronic symptomatic asthma requiring daily therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with salmeterol xinafoate (42 micrograms inhaled twice daily), albuterol (180 micrograms inhaled four times daily), or placebo (four times a day) for 12 weeks; patients in all three groups could use inhaled albuterol as backup medication for breakthrough symptoms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial 12-hour forced expiratory flow in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings due to asthma, episodes of asthma exacerbations, and electrocardiography. RESULTS: The mean area under the curve for FEV1 throughout each 12-hour period was consistently greater after a single dose of salmeterol than after two doses of albuterol administered 6 hours apart (P < .001), with the difference ranging from 3.1 to 4.3 L.h. Salmeterol produced an average increase in morning and evening PEF of 26 and 29 L/min, respectively, over pretreatment values compared with decreases of -13 and -3 L/min, respectively, in the albuterol group and -2 L/min both in the morning and evening in the placebo group (P < .001). Patients in the salmeterol group had significantly fewer days and nights with symptoms than did either the albuterol or placebo group (P < .001). Responses to salmeterol were similar at day 1 and at week 12. Adverse events in all treatment groups were equally infrequent, and no clinically significant change in cardiac rhythm was observed with salmeterol treatment. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol inhaled twice daily is more effective than albuterol inhaled four times a day (or as needed) in patients with asthma requiring maintenance therapy. No deterioration of asthma control was observed with the use of salmeterol over a 3-month period.     

Proteins in uterine secretions of fertile and sterile patients using SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol has been shown in several in vitro studies to produce non-beta-mediated relaxant effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects have any relevance in humans in vivo. Thirteen healthy individuals were studied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study on five separate days. The subjects were pre-treated orally with either propranolol 400 mg in order to block beta-adrenoceptor mediated effects or placebo. Two hours after drug intake, three increasing doses of salmeterol (25 + 50 + 100 micrograms), salbutamol (100 + 200 + 400 micrograms) or placebo were given from matched meter dose inhalers at 1-h intervals between doses. Specific airway conductance (sGAW) was measured in a body plethysmograph at the beginning of the experiment and 30 and 60 min after each inhaled dose of the beta-agonists. Salmeterol and salbutamol produced the same maximal increase in sGAW and had the same area under the dose-response curves. Pre-treatment with propranolol totally inhibited the effect of both drugs. In conclusion, salmeterol at clinically used doses did not produce any non-beta-mediated bronchodilating effect in normal individuals, measured as sGAW. Salmeterol and salbutamol showed the same efficacy but salmeterol was four times more potent than salbutamol.     

Salmeterol compared with slow-release terbutaline in nocturnal asthma. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, sequential clinical trial. French Multicenter Study Group

The aim of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group clinical trial with a 2-week treatment period was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol (50 micrograms twice daily) with slow-release (SR) terbutaline (5 mg orally, twice daily) in nocturnal asthma. A total of 159 asthmatic adults (FEV, 50-90% of predicted value; sex ratio: 0.87) with at least two nocturnal awakenings during a 7-d run-in period was included in the study. Patients were centrally randomized with a national computer network (Minitel). The main variable (number of awakening-free nights during the last week of treatment) was analyzed according to a sequential method with the one-sided triangular test. The number of awakening-free nights (+/- SD) was significantly higher in the salmeterol group: 5.3 +/- 2.4 vs 4.6 +/- 2.3 (P = 0.006). Salmeterol was significantly more effective than SR-terbutaline in the following factors: number of patients without any awakening during the last week of treatment (50% vs 27%, P = 0.003), mean morning PEF (351 +/- 109 l/min-1 vs 332 +/- 105 l/min-1, P = 0.04), PEF diurnal variation 6 +/- 10% vs 11 +/- 12%, P = 0.01), overall assessment of efficacy by the patient and the investigator (P = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively), and daily rescue salbutamol intakes (P = 0.004). In the salmeterol group, significantly fewer patients reported adverse events (16% vs 29%, P = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A 6-month comparison between formoterol and salmeterol in patients with reversible obstructive airways disease

The aim of this randomized, open, parallel group study was to compare the clinical efficacy of formoterol dry powder capsule 12 micrograms b.i.d. and salmeterol dry powder 50 micrograms b.i.d. in the treatment of patients with reversible obstructive airways disease. The 6-month treatment was preceded by a 2 week run-in period. Morning pre-dose peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last 7 days of treatment was the primary variable. Throughout the study, patients recorded morning and evening pre-dose PEF, use of rescue medication, respiratory symptoms and adverse events. Clinic visits were scheduled at monthly intervals. Of the 482 patients randomized (equal numbers in the two treatment groups), 428 completed the study. Four hundred and twenty-five patients were included in the efficacy analysis for the primary variable. For mean morning pre-dose PEF during the last 7 days of treatment, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment contrast formoterol minus salmeterol was included entirely in the pre-defined range of equivalence (CI limits = -8.69, +9.841 min-1). This was also the case for the morning PEF during the last week before each clinic visit. For mean evening pre-dose PEF, the estimated treatment contrasts showed a trend towards superiority of formoterol over salmeterol, which became statistically significant at 2, 3 and 4 months (P < 0.05; estimated contrasts 7.27, 10.45 and 10.511 min-1, respectively). No treatment group differences were found in use of rescue medication and respiratory symptom scores. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. These findings demonstrate that formoterol 12 micrograms b.i.d. and salmeterol 50 micrograms b.i.d., both formulated as dry powders, have similar long-term efficacy and safety profiles in patients with reversible obstructive airways disease.     

Overnight protection by inhaled salmeterol on exercise-induced asthma in children

The main aim of the present study was to evaluate whether inhaled salmeterol given in the evening protected against exercise-induced asthma the next morning. Twenty three children (12 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 11 yrs and with exercise-induced asthma participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The children inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms, salmeterol 50 micrograms and placebo by Diskhaler at 10 p.m. on 3 separate days. Next morning, half of the children ran on a motor-driven treadmill for 6 min at submaximal load at 8 a.m. and the remainder at 10 a.m. Lung function was measured by maximal expiratory flow-volume loops before running, immediately after, and 3, 6, 10 and 15 min after running. The mean maximum reduction in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after treadmill run was 34% before inclusion in the study. Mean maximum fall in FEV1 was significantly greater after placebo: 30% (23-36) 95% confidence interval) than after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 19% (12-23) or salmeterol 50 micrograms: 18% (12-25). In addition to the reduced postexercise bronchoconstriction, pre-exercise lung function (FEV1) was significantly higher both after salmeterol 25 micrograms: 2.4 L.s-1 (2.1-2.7) and salmeterol 50 micrograms: 2.5 L.s-1 (2.2-2.8) than after placebo: 2.2 L.s-1 (1.9-2.5). No significant differences in pre- and postexercise lung function were found between children tested at 8 or 10 a.m., or in relation to salmeterol dosage. Thus, inhaled salmeterol 25 and 50 micrograms offered similar overnight protection against exercise-induced asthma and improved baseline lung function in the morning as compared to placebo.     

The preterm prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

This study has compared the efficacy and tolerability of formoterol (FORADIL) dry powder and salbutamol in elderly patients with reversible obstructive airways disease (ROAD). A total of 262 elderly outpatients with clinically stable ROAD participated in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel study. Patients were randomized in equal numbers to receive formoterol 12 micrograms b.i.d. formoterol 24 micrograms b.i.d. or salbutamol 400 micrograms q.i.d. for a 3 month period. All study drugs were inhaled through an Aeroliser device. Daily morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values, symptom scores and additional bronchodilator use were recorded by the patients throughout the study. Clinic assessment which included spirometry and PEF measurements was made at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Morning and evening PEF values were significantly higher with both doses of formoterol compared with salbutamol. This difference was statistically significant both for the overall study period and during the week preceding each of the clinic visits (4, 8 and 12 weeks). There was no significant difference for the two doses of formoterol with respect to PEF values. The FEV1 and FVC values between the three treatment groups were similar. The daily use of rescue medication was significantly lower for the formoterol 24 micrograms group compared with the salbutamol group. The percentage of patients rating the therapeutic effect as 'very good' was significantly higher for formoterol: 41% on 12 micrograms; 34% on 24 micrograms; 19% on salbutamol. All treatments were well tolerated. This study demonstrates that formoterol 12 micrograms and 24 micrograms b.i.d. by dry powder inhalation are equally effective and are both significantly superior to salbutamol 400 micrograms q.i.d. in the treatment of ROAD in the elderly.     

Randomised, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study of chimeric antibody to CD4 (keliximab) in chronic severe asthma

BACKGROUND: There is substantial circumstantial evidence that CD4 lymphocytes have a role in the pathogenesis of chronic asthma. We investigated the efficacy and safety in severe corticosteroid-dependent asthma of a single intravenous infusion of keliximab (IDEC CE9.1), a chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD4. METHODS: 22 patients were recruited from two asthma clinics. In an ascending-dose design, the first eight patients were assigned 0.5 mg/kg keliximab (six) or placebo (two); the next seven were assigned 1.5 mg/kg (five) or placebo (two); and the last seven were assigned 3.0 mg/kg (five) or placebo (two). Masked data on safety for each dose group were assessed before progression to the next dose. Patients kept a daily symptom diary and measured morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) at home. PEF and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured at follow-up clinic visits. FINDINGS: Patients given 0.5 mg/kg or 1.5 mg/kg keliximab and placebo recipients did not differ in change from baseline of PEF, FEV1, or symptom score. Those given 3.0 mg/kg keliximab differed significantly from placebo recipients in change in morning PEF (median area under curve [AUC] 445 vs -82.5, p=0.005) and evening PEF (median AUC 548 vs -85, p=0.014). Symptom score showed the same pattern (though differences did not achieve significance), but there was no difference in clinic FEV1. There were no serious adverse effects related to treatment. Two patients had mild exacerbations of eczema and one developed a transient maculopapular rash. All doses of keliximab were associated with a reduction from baseline in CD4 count. INTERPRETATION: Our findings raise the possibility that T-cell-directed treatment may be an alternative approach to the treatment of severe asthma.     

Efficacy, tolerability, and effects on quality of life of inhaled salmeterol and oral theophylline in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. SLMT02 Italian Study Group

The aims of management in mild-to-moderate stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are to improve symptoms and quality of life (QOL), reduce decline in lung function, prevent and treat complications, increase survival while maintaining QOL, and minimize the adverse effects of treatment. Bronchodilator therapy is the keystone of improving COPD symptoms and functional capacity. The primary objective of this open-label study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol 50 microg BID administered by metered-dose inhaler versus oral, titrated, sustained-release theophylline BID, both given for 3 months to patients with a clinical history of chronic bronchitis. The secondary objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety profile of the two drugs for an additional 9-month period and to assess changes in QOL both within and between treatment groups, using the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey. One hundred seventy-eight outpatients (122 men, 56 women; mean age, 56 +/- 12.9 years; mean body weight, 76.1 +/- 11.8 kg) were randomized to the two treatment groups. Patients receiving salmeterol showed significant improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (16.56 L/min) over the 3-month period compared with patients receiving theophylline (P = 0.02). Salmeterol also significantly increased the percentage of symptom-free days and nights with no additional salbutamol requirement (P < 0.01). A significant difference was found between increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with baseline for salmeterol compared with theophylline throughout the initial 3-month period (0.13, 0.16, and 0.16 L at months 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and during the additional 9 months. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups (salmeterol, 49.5%; theophylline, 49.4%), with a lower percentage of pharmacologically predictable adverse events in patients receiving salmeterol (4%) compared with those receiving theophylline (14.8%). Both drugs improved QOL, as measured by effects on the eight aspects of life experience analyzed by the SF-36 questionnaire. Salmeterol therapy was effective in more aspects, and the improvements seen in each were numerically greater than those seen with theophylline therapy. Statistically different changes between the two treatment groups were reported for physical functioning, changes in health perception, and social functioning (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, and P = 0.004, respectively). These data suggest that inhaled salmeterol 50 microg BID was more effective and better tolerated than oral, titrated theophylline and allowed better long-term control of airways obstruction and symptoms with improved lung function in patients with COPD.     

Efficacy and safety of inhaled Salmeterol (Serevent) as maintenance therapy for asthma in Nairobi

An open study to assess the efficacy and safety of 50 micrograms inhaled Salmeterol (Serevent) administered twice daily as maintenance therapy for asthma was undertaken by the Respiratory Diseases Research Unit (RDRU) in Nairobi between August and October, 1992. Salmeterol (Hydroxynaphthoate) is a long acting selective beta-2-agonist. Seventy-three adult patients recruited at Kenyatta National Hospital underwent a two weeks treatment period during which they were assessed over three visits. At Visit 1, eligibility was confirmed, baseline lung function indices measured, the study drug introduced and all the previous medications withdrawn. After treatment for one week (Visit 2) and two weeks (Visit 3), lung function indices were measured again and subjective patients' and physicians' assessments of efficacy documented. Patients with obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) at baseline had significant improvement in their lung function compared to those without at the end of the treatment period. A significant number of patients reported decreased number of nocturnal awakenings and increased tolerance to physical activity. Cough, headache and itchy throat were adverse events possibly related to the use of Salmeterol. The patients treated with Salmeterol gained improved control of their asthma symptoms. The drug offers a convenient dose schedule and we recommend its use for maintenance therapy for mild to moderate asthma.     

High-dose inhaled budesonide may substitute for oral therapy after an acute asthma attack

Patients attending the emergency room with acute asthma, participating in a study comparing salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) via a dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) with pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), were included in this 1-week follow-up study with the aim of assessing whether inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler may be an alternative to prednisolone tablets after an acute asthma attack. Eighty-one patients with a mean age of 38 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of 64% predicted normal value after treatment with salbutamol were randomized in this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The doses given were budesonide 1600 microg b.i.d. or prednisolone in daily doses from 40 mg (day 1) decreased to 5 mg (day 7). FEV1 was recorded before and after the 7-day treatments and peak expiratory flow (PEF) morning and evening, clinical symptoms (visual analogue scale 0-100), and doses of rescue medication (terbutaline Turbuhaler 0.25 mg/dose) were recorded daily. The mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to day 7 was 17.3% in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and 17.6% in the prednisolone group. Mean values of morning PEF increased from day 1 to day 7 by 67 L/min in the budesonide Turbuhaler group and by 57 L/min in the prednisolone group (not significant). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clinical symptoms and in the number of doses of rescue medication. Because of disease deterioration, five patients in the Turbuhaler group and three in the prednisolone group needed additional symptomatic as well as corticosteroid treatment. Inhaled budesonide in high doses may be a substitute for oral therapy as follow-up treatment after an acute asthma attack.     

Sub-clinical worsening of bronchial asthma during estrogen replacement therapy in asthmatic post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND: Changes in asthma activity, in part related to the female hormonal profile, have been observed during pre-menstrual periods and during pregnancy. Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is an accepted routine treatment for post-menopausal women. The effect of ERT on disease activity in post-menopausal asthmatic women has not been investigated in the past and is the subject of the present study. METHODS: Fifteen post-menopausal women with mild to moderate asthma completed two 30-day periods in which they measured peak expiratory flow (PEF) at home and filled in a daily diary of asthma-related symptoms. The first monitoring period was pre-ERT and the second was during ERT. In addition spirometry was performed on each woman three times, twice pre-ERT and once during ERT. RESULTS: The average daily PEF decreased from 241 (57.9, S.D.) l/min pre-ERT to 226.7 (62.7) l/min during ERT (P < 0.004). Significant differences between the two study periods were also found in morning and evening PEF values. Diurnal variation, measured as the difference between morning and evening PEF values, decreased significantly from 22.3 (26.7) l/min pre-ERT to 17.5 (26.8) l/min during ERT (P < 0.007). The average daily consumption of bronchodilator inhalers increased significantly from 3.7 puffs/day pre-ERT to 4.3 puffs/day during ERT (P < 0.006). Although the differences in spirometry between the two periods did not reach statistical significance, a trend towards a worsening of the obstructive disorder during ERT was observed. However, the general feeling of well-being of the asthmatics did not change during the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: During ERT a sub-clinical worsening of disease activity was found in postmenopausal women with mild to moderate asthma. We also detected a decrease in diurnal variation. Our findings should be substantiated by additional studies.     

Differences between asthma exacerbations and poor asthma control

BACKGROUND: Increased variation in peak expiratory flow (PEF) is characteristic of poorly controlled asthma, and measurement of diurnal variability of PEF has been recommended for assessment of asthma severity, including during exacerbations. We aimed to test whether asthma exacerbations had the same PEF characteristics as poor asthma control. METHODS: Electronic PEF records from 43 patients with initially poorly controlled asthma were examined for all exacerbations that occurred after PEF reached a plateau with inhaled corticosteroid treatment. Diurnal variability of PEF was compared during exacerbations, run-in (poor asthma control), and the period of stable asthma before each exacerbation. FINDINGS: Diurnal variability was 21.3% during poor asthma control and improved to 5.3% (stable asthma) with inhaled corticosteroid treatment. 40 exacerbations occurred in 26 patients over 2-16 months; 38 (95%) of exacerbations were associated with symptoms of clinical respiratory infection. During exacerbations, consecutive PEF values fell linearly over several days then improved linearly. However, diurnal variability during exacerbations (7.7%) was not significantly higher than during stable asthma (5.4%, p=0.1). PEF data were consistent with impaired response to inhaled beta2-agonist during exacerbations but not during poorly controlled asthma. INTERPRETATION: Asthmatics remain vulnerable to exacerbations during clinical respiratory infections, even after asthma is brought under control. Calculation of diurnal variability may fail to detect important changes in lung function. PEF variation is strikingly different during exacerbations compared with poor asthma control, suggesting differences in beta2-adrenoceptor function between these conditions.     

Grasping spatial relationships: failure to demonstrate allocentric visual coding in a patient with visual form agnosia

The aim of this multicenter, double-masked study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two different doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder--50 micrograms and 100 micrograms--administered BID via a multidose powder inhaler with those of placebo in the treatment of children with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, 263 patients were randomized to treatment with twice-daily placebo (n = 92), fluticasone 50 micrograms (n = 85), or fluticasone 100 micrograms (n = 86) for 12 weeks. One hundred sixty-six (63%) patients were male, and 224 (85%) were white, with a mean age of 8 years. Two hundred twenty-one (84%) patients were atopic, and 167 (63%) had been asthmatic for 1 to 5 years. Baseline mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were 207 L/min, 199 L/min, and 194 L/min, and baseline percentages of predicted normal values were 86%, 80%, and 81% for the groups receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. At the end of the first week of treatment, patients in both fluticasone groups had significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did those receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 4 L/min, 22 L/min, and 26 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. At the end point (the last evaluable visit), patients in both fluticasone groups continued to have significantly greater improvements in morning PEF than did patients receiving placebo. Patients experienced mean increases of 17 L/min, 50 L/min, and 57 L/min with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. Changes in the percentage of predicted values by end point were 8%, 20%, and 26% with placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. The probability of remaining in the study, according to predefined withdrawal criteria, indicated a significant treatment difference in favor of fluticasone. Withdrawal criteria were met by 63%, 42%, and 29% of patients receiving placebo, fluticasone 50 micrograms, and fluticasone 100 micrograms, respectively. This study clearly demonstrates the superiority of fluticasone 50 and 100 micrograms BID over placebo in the treatment of persistent asthma in children.     

Salmeterol: a novel, long-acting beta 2-agonist

OBJECTIVE: The clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol are reviewed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was performed to identify English-language publications pertaining to salmeterol. STUDY SELECTION: Open and controlled trials were reviewed in assessing clinical efficacy. Only the results of controlled, randomized trials were considered in the effectiveness evaluation. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary measures of effectiveness in the clinical trials were bronchodilator activity and reduction of hyperresponsiveness that may reflect antiinflammatory activity. Bronchodilator activity was measured as changes in pulmonary function; reduction of hyperresponsiveness was evaluated using respiratory challenge with methacholine, histamine, allergen, or cold air. Secondary measures included symptom scores, need for rescue doses, and patient preference. DATA SYNTHESIS: Salmeterol is a selective, beta 2-agonist that has been studied in the treatment of exercise-induced, nocturnal, and allergen-induced asthma. Salmeterol interacts with the traditional beta-receptor in a similar manner as other beta-agonists, and it exhibits potent in vitro antiinflammatory effects as an inhibitor of inflammatory mediator release. Less evidence exists for its in vivo antiinflammatory activity. Salmeterol demonstrates prolonged receptor occupancy, which is thought to contribute to its long duration of action. The recommended dose is 50 micrograms via metered-dose inhaler or dry-powdered inhalation. In the published clinical trials, salmeterol was more effective than albuterol in treating asthma, including exercise and allergen-induced asthma. Salmeterol's major advantage over other inhaled beta-agonists is its long duration of action (12 hours), making it an excellent choice for treatment of nocturnal asthma. A potential disadvantage is delayed onset of action. Tachyphylaxis to salmeterol's bronchodilator effects has not been shown, but tolerance to its protective effects against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction has occurred. Adverse effects reported have been mild and have included headache, tremor, and palpitations. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol is an effective beta 2-agonist in the treatment of asthma. However, several issues require further investigation regarding its long-term effects on disease control, significance of antiinflammatory activity, and role as a rescue medication.     

Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is the most widely prescribed short acting beta 2 agonist and salmeterol is the first long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist. The dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol is disputed. Estimates of weight-for-weight dose ratio have ranged from 1:2 to 1:16. A study was undertaken to clarify the true dose ratio. METHODS: The bronchoprotection afforded against repeated methacholine challenge by inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms and 100 micrograms and salbutamol 100 micrograms and 400 micrograms was compared in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were 16 stable asthmatics with a baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% predicted, screening concentration provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20FEV1) of < or = 8mg/ml, and a shift in PC20FEV1 of more than two doubling concentration steps following inhalation of salbutamol 400 micrograms. On five separate occasions subjects underwent methacholine challenge before and 30 and 120 minutes after drug administration. PD20FEV1 was calculated for each challenge. FEV1 at 90 minutes after drug administration was also recorded. RESULTS: Bronchoprotection afforded by salmeterol was increased at 120 minutes compared with 30 minutes and protection by salbutamol was decreased. Protection by both doses of salmeterol was similar to salbutamol 100 micrograms at 30 minutes but significantly greater at 120 minutes. FEV1 at 90 minutes was significantly greater after salmeterol 100 micrograms than after placebo, but there were no other significant differences between treatments. Maximal observed protection was equivalent for salmeterol 100 micrograms and salbutamol 400 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: The data are compatible with a weight-for-weight dose ratio for salmeterol:salbutamol of < or = 1:4.     

High dose fluticasone propionate, 1 mg daily, versus fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, or budesonide, 1.6 mg daily, in patients with chronic severe asthma. International Study Group

Airway inflammation is now regarded as fundamental in the pathogenesis of asthma and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids has proved effective. There is a need for drugs in this category with higher topical potency but fewer side-effects than those presently available. A double-blind, parallel group study was conducted in 671 patients with severe asthma (already taking between 0.8-2.0 mg of inhaled corticosteroid daily) to compare the safety and efficacy of 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1 mg daily, to fluticasone propionate, 2 mg daily, and budesonide (BUD), 1.6 mg daily, delivered via a metered-dose inhaler. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and usage of rescue medication were recorded daily by the patient. At each clinic visit (-2, 0, 3 and 6 weeks) morning serum cortisol levels, bone markers and spirometry were assessed. The changes in mean morning PEF from baseline (weeks 1-6) were: FP 2 mg daily +24 l.min-1; FP 1 mg daily +21 l.min-1; BUD 1.6 mg daily +13 l.min-1. A similar rank order for the three treatments was seen for evening PEF, clinic spirometry, reduction of diurnal PEF variation, symptom scores, and requirement for rescue bronchodilators. The mean serum cortisol levels remained well within the normal range in all three groups. Analysis of the geometric mean cortisol ratio (treatment/baseline ratio after 6 weeks treatment) showed a changed rank order, the values being: FP 1 mg daily 1.04; BUD 1.6 mg daily 0.97; FP 2 mg daily 0.88.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effectiveness of salbutamol powder (Ventodisk Glaxo) compared to dosed aerosols (sultanol)

The study deals with the effect of salbutamol powder (Ventodisk) administered with Diskhaler device comparatively to salbutamol dosed aerosols. The analysis of PEF variations on morning and evening in a group of patients unable to use correctly the dosed aerosols leads to the conclusion that salbutamol powder succeeds in a higher effect since the administration by Diskhaler is far easier.     

The effect of salmeterol on nocturnal symptoms, airway function, and inflammation in asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of salmeterol alone in a group of patients with moderate asthma with nocturnal worsening of symptoms. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital specializing in respiratory diseases. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with nocturnal asthma. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized to salmeterol, 100 micrograms twice daily, or placebo for 6 weeks with a 1-week washout between treatment periods. Symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and beta 2-agonist use were recorded daily. Spirometry was performed at weeks 1 and 6 of each period at bedtime and at 4 AM, and methacholine challenge was performed at 4 AM followed by bronchoscopy with BAL. BAL fluid analysis included cell count and differential count, eosinophil cationic protein, Charcot-Leyden crystal protein, leukotriene B4, and thromboxane B2. RESULTS: The percentage of nights with awakenings decreased significantly with salmeterol (69.8 +/- 8.7% vs 30.6 +/- 10.8% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.02). The percentage of 24-h days with supplemental inhaled beta 2-agonist use significantly decreased with salmeterol (85.9 +/- 9.4% vs 70.4 +/- 10.1% for placebo and salmeterol, respectively; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in bronchial reactivity, 4 AM FEV1, overnight percentage change in FEV1, or indexes of airway inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Salmeterol alone improves the number of nocturnal awakenings and supplemental 24-h beta 2-agonist use in nocturnal asthma without significantly altering lung function and airway inflammation.     

Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, causes dose-related improvements in chronic asthma. Montelukast Asthma Study Group

The leukotrienes are known to be important mediators of bronchial asthma. The ability of montelukast, a potent and selective CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonist, to cause a dose-related improvement in chronic asthma was investigated in a placebo-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. After a two week placebo run-in period, chronic asthmatic patients with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 40-80% predicted with > or = 15% increase (absolute value) after beta2-agonist were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (placebo or montelukast 2, 10, or 50 mg once daily in the evening) for a three week, double-blind treatment period. For patient-reported end-points (daytime symptom score, use of as needed inhaled beta2 agonist, asthma-specific quality of life) and frequency of asthma exacerbations, montelukast 10 and 50 mg caused similar responses, superior to 2 mg and significantly (p<0.05; linear trend test) different from placebo. All three doses caused improvements in FEV1 and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) that were significantly (p<0.05) different from placebo. Differences (least square mean) between the pooled 10 and 50 mg montelukast treatment groups and placebo were: 7.1% change from baseline in FEV1, 19.23 L x min(-1) in morning PEFR, -0.29 in daytime asthma symptom score (absolute value), and -0.82 in beta2-agonist use (puff x day(-1)). The incidence of adverse experiences was neither dose-related nor different between montelukast and placebo treatments. We conclude that montelukast causes a dose-related improvement in patient-reported asthma end-points over the range 2-50 mg. Montelukast causes benefit to chronic asthmatic patients by improving asthma control end-points.