2004年浙江省蚕茧生产情况

据浙江省丝绸协会对浙江省近30家市(县)蚕茧收购单位的数据统计，浙江省今年蚕茧发种量173．7万张，比上年增长5％，蚕茧生产量7．59万t(152万担)，比上年增长10％，蚕茧收购量5．81万t(116万担)，比上年增长16．7％，平均收购价格865．28元／50kg(担)，比上年增加109．01元／50kg(担)，增幅为14．4％(其中春茧收购价899．94元，夏茧687．15元，秋茧844．8元)。     

四川省纤维检验局开展春茧收购执法检查工作

四川省春茧收购工作已全面开始，各地纤检机构陆续开展了蚕茧收购执法检查工作。2005年6月8日至今，四川省纤维检验局的两个执法检查组在分管领导李明的带领下分别到宜宾、泸州、德阳、绵阳等地对当地的蚕茧收购进行了检查和督查工作。从检查的情况看，今年的蚕茧收购与往年的情况类似，即各地在收购蚕茧时普遍以手感目测口喊价、     

今年春茧收购形势复杂多变

蚕茧主产区江浙地区的春茧收购即将全面展开，由于春茧期出现了许多不利于蚕宝宝正常发育的自然因素。对春茧优质高产造成一定影响，但同时在各地区的努力下，加之国内外需求旺盛、贸工农各方热情高涨等，有利于春茧收购，但不利因素仍然存在，使得——[编者按]     

对毛脚茧说“不”

<正>一年一度茧丝绸行业紧张而又繁忙的春茧收购至6月中旬落下帷幕,江、浙两地传来喜人消息:今年的春茧收购秩序较好,蚕茧质量也好于去年。究其原因,除了今年气候适宜,风调雨顺,那就是响应了江、浙两省丝绸协会的倡议:不收毛脚茧,交售化蛹茧。     

遂宁市加强蚕茧收购管理的措施

1 我市 2 0 0 1年蚕茧收购情况2 0 0 1年全市发蚕种 1 4 3万张 ,收购鲜茧31 7 4万公斤 ,同比增长 3 3% ;全年正茧均价1 2 54元 /ｋｇ ,蚕农茧款收入 380 0多万元 ,保持了 2 0 0 0年水平。我市蚕茧有以下特点 :1 1　整顿蚕茧市场 ,维护了市场秩序按照中、省的统一要求 ,召开了蚕茧收购工作会 ,安排部署了全年的蚕茧收购工作 ,对蚕茧收购经营继续实行“三不放开”政策 ,即不放开蚕茧收购经营渠道 ,不放开蚕茧市场 ,不放开蚕茧收购价格 ,继续由各级丝绸公司统一管理、收购与经营。各区、县采取政府发通告等方式将蚕茧收购政策及价格信息发布…     

泰安纤检所组织开展2006年春茧收购执法检查

泰安市纤维检验所自2006年6月7日起组织开展了春茧收购执法检查。根据在去年发现的问题．泰安纤检所集中优势力量对2005年新建的、存在问题较多的3家民营企业进行了突击检查．发现他们都有了一定的改进。对仍存在的个别问题．执法人员现场向企业领导提出了具体措施。要求他们在今后工作中进一步完善蚕茧收购工作。     

湖北省专业纤检机构开展春茧收烘环节质量监督检查

根据中纤局统一部署，黄冈、宜昌、襄阳等市专业纤检机构对辖区内春茧收烘环节进行了质量监督检查。共出动执法人员50余人次．检查蚕茧收购站（点）11个，抽验13批．代表数量159．8吨。检查情况表明．我省今年蚕茧质量状况基本平稳，没有发现公开的掺杂掺假、以次充好等严重质量违法行为．     

2008年春茧产量下降收购秩序良好

2008年全国春茧生产收购工作已经结束。据初步统计，全国19个蚕茧生产省，桑园面积1375万亩，同比下降0.15%，蚕种发种量889.39万线，同比下降9.51%，蚕茧产量32.84万t，同比下降8.59%，综合均价928元/担（50kg），同比下降2.72%，但比去年秋茧价格回升13.81%，收购秩序总体好于去年，蚕农实现收入60.95亿元。     

行业动态

安徽省确定今年蚕茧收购价格；浙江省春茧收购均价为950元／50kg；陕西省春茧收购均价为760元／50kg；江苏宿迁春季鲜茧收购价格730元／50kg；四川绵阳鲜茧收购中准价每公斤13．8元；2005年广西茧丝绸工作会议在南宁召开；国内第一只绢丝股票在新加坡上市；     

淮阴市纤检所宣贯鲜茧标准

2000年春茧收购前夕,由江苏省淮阴市质量技术监督局、淮阴市茧丝绸行业总会共同组织,由淮阴市纤检所承办的“江苏省桑蚕茧(鲜茧)地方强制性标准淮阴宣贯班”在淮阴举办。全市各(鲜茧)收烘站站长及检验人员共计40人参加了培训。培训班上聘请了省有关专家对《江苏省桑蚕茧(鲜茧)分级及检验方法》地方强制性标准以及《江苏省产品质量监督管理办法》、     

2010年河南省部分食品中重金属污染状况分析

了解河南省部分食品中重金属污染的现状。方法 在河南省18个省辖市采集8大类3 657份食品样品,按照国家标准检测食品中铅、镉和汞的含量,检测结果按照GB 2762—2012《食品安全国家标准食品中污染物限量》进行评价。结果 河南省部分食品中铅含量的平均值为0.34 mg/kg,总体超标率为8.8%(320/3 656),其中粮食、肉类和蔬菜中超标率较高,分别为17.2%(95/552)、14.5%(85/587)和10.7%(57/534);部分食品中镉含量的平均值为0.054 mg/kg,总体超标率为3.9%(143/3 657),其中食用菌和蛋类中超标率较高,分别为9.6%(49/508)和8.1%(42/518);部分食品中汞含量的平均值为0.077 mg/kg,总体超标率为8.3%(303/3 657),其中蔬菜和粮食中超标率较高,分别为25.3%(135/534)和12.3%(68/551)。结论 河南省部分食品中铅、汞污染情况较为严重,其中粮食、蔬菜和肉类食品中污染情况尤为突出,需要加强监管。     

Changes in smoking prevalence in Ukraine in 2001-5

Objectives

To analyse trends in smoking prevalence in Ukraine from three surveys conducted in 2001–5, and to explore correlates of observed changes, in order to estimate the stage of tobacco epidemic in Ukraine.

Design

Repeated national interview surveys in Ukraine in 2001, 2002 and 2005.

Main outcome measure

Prevalence of current smoking among the population aged ⩾15 years.

Results

The age‐standardised prevalence of current smoking in Ukrainian men was 54.8% in 2001 and 66.8% in 2005. Among Ukrainian women, prevalence increased from 11.5% in 2001 to 20.0% in 2005. ORs for yearly increase in prevalence were estimated as 1.164 (95% CI 1.111 to 1.220) for men and 1.187 (1.124 to 1.253) for women, which implies that, on average, 3–4% of men and 1.5–2% of women living in Ukraine join the smoking population each year.

Conclusions

In Ukraine, smoking prevalence is increasing in most population groups. Among men, the medium deprivation group with secondary education has the highest smoking prevalence. Among women, while the most educated, young and those living in larger cities are the leading group for tobacco use, other groups are also increasing their tobacco use. Tobacco promotion efforts appear to have been significantly more effective in Ukraine than smoking control efforts. The decrease in real cigarette prices in Ukraine in 2001–5 could be the main factor explaining the recent growth in smoking prevalence.Ukraine is a large eastern European country with high smoking prevalence. Tobacco products are widely available at very low prices, and the transnational tobacco industry is extremely successful in promoting its products and lobbying for its interests in the legislative field. Advocacy of tobacco control has only recently achieved some success in the legislative field, with the first tobacco control law being adopted in late 2005. Ukraine ratified the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in 2006, but there is still much cause for concern regarding the enforcement and effectiveness of the adopted legislative measures. Unfortunately, the government is not yet involved in nationwide surveillance of the tobacco problem, and the available data have mostly been gathered with funding from foreign donors. Several attempts have been made to measure the extent of the tobacco epidemic in the countries of the former Soviet Union (FSU).^{1,2,3,4,5,6,7} Most of these studies have shown rather high smoking prevalence among men (50–70%) and comparatively low prevalence among women (5–20%). Most countries in the FSU have similar smoking rates, while certain trends are shown to be related to the differences in how the transnational tobacco industry succeeds in every national tobacco market.⁶ Unfortunately, few studies have been published showing trends in smoking prevalence in the FSU.⁷ In Ukraine, two studies^3,4 provided point estimates of smoking prevalence.The aim of this study was to analyse trends in smoking prevalence in Ukraine, on the basis of three surveys conducted in 2001–5, and to explore correlates of observed changes in order to estimate the stage of the tobacco epidemic in Ukraine.