Small-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 98 parturients undergoing cesarean section received either hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural procedure. To prevent hypotension, 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%, and ephedrine 5 mg were administered i.v. The height of the block was equal in both groups, but more patients in the plain group had blocks that were either too high or too low (P < 0.01). The number of patients requiring epidural supplementation was equal in both groups. Strict criteria were used to treat hypotension. The overall incidence of systolic blood pressure (<90 mm Hg) was 13%, whereas it was more pronounced in the plain group (21% vs 6% in the hyperbaric group, P < 0.05), which required more ephedrine (P < 0.05) and in which a greater incidence of nausea was noticed (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of a small dose of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with sufentanil plus our described preloading regimen resulted in a lower incidence of hypotension. Further, we conclude that the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine in this manner provides a more reliable block and a lower incidence of hypotension than plain bupivacaine. Implications: A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with sufentanil used intrathecally during cesarean section offered a more reliable cephalad spread of the spinal block than the glucose-free combination, which was reflected in a lower incidence of hypotension and nausea.     

Unilateral spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: The dosage of local anaesthetic and the time the patient must be kept in the lateral decubitus position for a unilateral spinal anaesthesia is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the ideal dosage of hyperbaric bupivacaine and the time required for the lateral decubitus position for a unilateral spinal block. METHODS: Ninety patients who were scheduled to receive spinal block for surgery in the lower extremity were randomised into 9 groups (n = 10). The spinal block was performed through the L4-L5 intervertebral space with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Patients in groups Ia, Ib, Ic; IIa, IIb, IIc; IIIa, IIIb, IIIc received 1.5 ml of 0.5%, 2 ml of 0.5%, and 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solutions, respectively. The patients were turned to the supine position for 5 min after the injection in groups Ia, IIa, IIIa, 10 min after the injection in groups Ib, IIb, IIIb, and 15 min after the injection in groups Ic, IIc, IIIc. The onset and regression of sensory and motor block were checked and compared between the dependent and non-dependent sides in each group. RESULTS: The rate of block progression of the non-dependent side was higher in the groups receiving 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution than in the other groups; at the same time the level of block was higher and the duration of block was longer. The incidence of hypotension was 10-20% in these groups. In the 2 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution groups, a satisfactory block level and duration of anaesthesia for surgery was obtained. The rate of block progression to non-dependent side in the groups receiving 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution was lower than the other groups, but the duration of block was shorter and the level of block was lower than the other groups. CONCLUSION: For unilateral spinal anaesthesia in lower extremity operations, 2ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution for operations above the knee and 1.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution for operations below the knee and keeping the patients for 10 min in the lateral decubitus position were found to be appropriate.     

Evaluation of intravenous tenoxicam for postoperative cesarean delivery pain relief. Preliminary report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess safety and efficacy of tenoxicam for postoperative pain relief after cesarean delivery. METHODS: Postoperative pain relief, supplemental analgesic requirements, and adverse side effects were evaluated in 80 patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Forty patients received a slow intravenous injection of tenoxicam at a fixed dose of 20 mg (2 mL), immediately before induction of spinal anesthesia with 15 mg (3 mL) of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The other 40 patients received 2 mL of saline solution. Newborns were evaluated by means of Apgar score and umbilical cord blood gases. RESULTS: There was a significant prolongation of analgesia in the tenoxicam group (365 +/- 91.1 minutes versus 305 +/- 53.2 minutes in control group, P < .001). Supplementary analgesic requirements were significantly decreased by intravenous tenoxicam (1.55 +/- 0.70 versus 2.25 +/- 0.68). Adverse side effects did not differ between groups and few complaints of phlebitis were noted. Apgar scores and blood gas analyses were similar in neonates from both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous tenoxicam is safe and slightly increases the length of postoperative analgesia provided by the local anesthetic. It is effective in decreasing analgesic consumption in cesarean delivery patients.     

Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a large series of elective lumbar spine surgical procedures by a single surgeon whose patients were all offered spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The records of all elective lumbar spine procedures between 1984 and 1995 performed by one surgeon (GRB) were obtained, and 803 were identified. Of those 803 patients, 611 accepted spinal anesthesia. Data collected included patient demographics, details of the spinal and general anesthesia, perioperative complications, and impact of the spinal anesthetic options on the outcome of spinal anesthesia. General and spinal anesthesia patients were comparable for age, gender, height, and ASA physical status. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly heavier than the general anesthesia patients. Among perioperative complications, nausea and deep venous thrombosis occurred significantly more often in the general than spinal anesthesia patients. Mild hypotension and decreased heart rate (HR) were the most common hemodynamic changes with spinal anesthesia, whereas hypertension and increased HR were the result of general anesthesia. Among spinal anesthetic drugs, plain bupivacaine was associated with the lowest incidence of supplemental local anesthetic use intraoperatively compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine or hyperbaric tetracaine. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is an effective alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery and has a reduced rate of minor complications.     

Peridural anesthesia versus subarachnoid anesthesia in cesarean section. Prospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical and clinical differences between epidural and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64 pregnant women at term scheduled for elective cesarean section. Two groups were randomized: A) PD Group (n = 32): continuous epidural anesthesia by administration of bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1/400,000 via an epidural catheter. Epidural morphine 3 mg was administered at the end of surgery. B) SP Group (n = 32): "single shot" spinal anesthesia by intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 1% bupivacaine 1-1.4 ml plus morphine 0.2 mg. The pin prick block level reached T2-T6 at incision time. DATA COLLECTION: 1) Time from the beginning of anesthesia to surgical incision. 2) Hypotension episodes. 3) Ephedrine consumption. 4) Intraoperative discomfort at delivery, traction and uterine manipulation, peritoneal toilette. 5) Nausea and vomiting. 6) Apgar score. 7) Postoperative headache. RESULTS: Women in the SP group had more hypotensive episodes (81% vs 53%: p < 0.05) and more ephedrine consumption with a large individual variability (29.12 mg +/- 20.4 vs 12.83 +/- 13.8: p < 0.01) when compared to PD group, without any difference in the Apgar score. The SP group required less time consumption (10.5 min. +/- 6.7 vs 35.9 min. +/- 17.3: p < 0.01) and had less intraoperative discomfort with less analgesic and/or sedative drugs consumption (9.7% vs 29%: p < 0.05) and less vomiting (3% vs 22.5%: p < 0.05). No postoperative headache was noticed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the described pharmacological and technical approach, spinal anesthesia is more suitable than continuous epidural technique for cesarean section, unless contraindicated.     

Spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: effect of site of injection on spread of analgesia

In this randomized, observer-blind study, we have examined, in elderly patients, the effect of site of injection on analgesia levels after spinal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution. Thirty male patients, aged 68-87 yr, undergoing minor urological surgery during spinal anaesthesia received 3 ml of a 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine solution at either the L3-4 (n = 15) or L4-5 (n = 15) interspace. The solution was injected with the patient in the sitting position. The patient remained sitting for 2 min and was then placed in the supine horizontal position. Analgesia levels were assessed bilaterally using pin-prick. The highest analgesia levels did not differ between groups (medians were approximately T7). There were no significant differences in the time to maximum cephalad spread of analgesia, maximum degree of motor block or haemodynamic changes. We conclude that injection at the L4-5 interspace has no advantage compared with injection at the L3-4 interspace.     

Pharmacology of local anesthetics and clinical aspects of segmental blocking. II. Spinal anesthesia

Clinical picture of development of segmental blocking after subarachnoidal injection of hyperbaric solutions of 0.75% bupivacaine, 5% ultracaine, and isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine is studied. A total of 152 patients operated on the lower part of the body and the lower limbs were examined under conditions of single, prolonged subarachnoidal, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Ultracaine and bupivacaine in different concentrations with different barism provided anesthesia equivalent by the efficacy, depth, and dissemination of sensory block. Segmental blocking with 5% ultracaine was characterized by the shortest latent period (3.14 +/- 0.16 min, p < 0.05) but was no shorter (124.1 +/- 3.37 min) than operative analgesia with 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine (120.0 +/- 5.10 min). Isobaric bupivacaine provided the longest effective analgesia (215.0 +/- 45.0 min, p < 0.05). Microcatheter technique improved the safety and control of subarachnoidal anesthesia in comparison with a single injection, and combined spinal epidural anesthesia shortened the latent period of segmental blocking and ensured intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia at the expense of the epidural component.     

Prospective study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND: There is considerable controversy regarding the role of subarachnoid 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in the syndrome transient radicular irritation (TRI). This randomized, double-blinded, prospective study was designed to determine the incidence of TRI and identify factors possibly contributing to its development. METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing outpatient knee arthroscopy or unilateral inguinal hernia repair were prospectively randomized to receive spinal anesthesia with 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (60 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for arthroscopy or 75 mg with 0.2 mg epinephrine for hernia repair), 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (60 mg for arthroscopy or 75 mg for hernia repair), or 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine without epinephrine (7.5 mg for arthroscopy or 9.0 mg for hernia repair) in a double-blinded fashion. On the 3rd postoperative day, patients were contacted by a blinded investigator and questioned regarding the incidence of postoperative complications including TRI, defined as back pain with radiation down one or both buttocks or legs occurring within 24 h after surgery. Postoperatively, time from injection to block resolution, ambulation, voiding, and ready for discharge were recorded by a postanesthesia care unit nurse blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS: The incidence of TRI was greater in patients receiving lidocaine than in those receiving bupivacaine (16% vs. 0%; P = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of TRI between the patients receiving 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine and those receiving 2% isobaric lidocaine without epinephrine (16% vs. 16%; P = 0.98). The incidence of TRI was greater in patients undergoing arthroscopy than in those undergoing hernia repair (13% vs. 5%; P = 0.04). There was no difference in discharge times in patients receiving bupivacaine versus those receiving hyperbaric lidocaine with epinephrine (292 vs. 322 min; P = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRI is greater with lidocaine than bupivacaine, decreasing the lidocaine concentration to 2% does not prevent TRI, and surgical position may be an important contributing factor. Discharge times at our institution are not different when equipotent doses of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 5% hyperbaric lidocaine with 0.2 mg epinephrine are used in ambulatory patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.     

Femoral and genitofemoral nerve blocks versus spinal anesthesia for outpatients undergoing long saphenous vein stripping surgery

Long saphenous vein stripping (LSVS) surgery is often used to treat varicose veins. We tested the hypothesis that femoral nerve block (FNB) with genitofemoral nerve infiltration provides sufficient analgesia and superior recovery characteristics to spinal anesthesia for LSVS procedures in the ambulatory setting. Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive FNB with 30 mL of 3% alkalinized chloroprocaine, and 32 patients received spinal anesthesia with 65 mg of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine. Data collected included patient demographics, time required for induction of and recovery from anesthesia, postoperative anesthesia complications, and patient report of pain severity after the operation. During a follow-up call, a blinded observer noted the onset of any complications, the requirement for analgesics, and the patients' satisfaction with the anesthetic technique. Patients in the FNB group had significantly faster recovery (P < 0.01) and lower incidences of pain (P < 0.05) and complications (P < 0.05) than the patients in the spinal group. All patients who received FNB indicated that they would choose this type of anesthesia in the future, whereas five (15%) patients in the spinal group would refuse spinal anesthesia in the future (P < 0.01). We conclude that FNB is an excellent anesthetic choice for LSVS.     

The effect of epinephrine on small-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: clinical implications for ambulatory surgery

The effect of adding epinephrine to small doses of spinal bupivacaine on the duration of sensory motor block has not been carefully investigated. Twelve volunteers underwent hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (7.5 mg) with and without epinephrine (0.2 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over fashion. Sensory block was assessed with pinprick, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) equivalent to surgical stimulation (at umbilicus, pubis, knee, and ankle), and tolerance of a pneumatic thigh tourniquet. Motor block was assessed with isometric force dynamometry. Discharge criteria were defined as return of pinprick sensation to dermatome S2, ability to ambulate, and ability to urinate. Extent of sensory block to pinprick over time was unaffected by the addition of epinephrine. However, epinephrine prolonged tolerance of TES at the pubis, knee, and ankle (33-48 min, P < 0.05) and of thigh tourniquet (30 min, P < 0.01). Motor block was prolonged by epinephrine at the quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles (by 23 and 51 min, respectively, P < 0.002). Achievement of discharge criteria was prolonged by 48 min by the addition of epinephrine (P < 0.01). Thus, epinephrine may prolong surgical anesthesia for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery and delay time until patients achieve discharge criteria. Implications: Using a cross-over study design, 12 volunteers underwent bupivacaine spinal anesthesia with and without epinephrine. This study suggests that adding epinephrine to bupivacaine may prolong surgical anesthesia and also delay patients' discharge.     

The addition of phenylephrine contributes to the development of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 0.5% tetracaine

BACKGROUND: Recent reports indicate that transient neurologic symptoms commonly occur after single-injection spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. Information regarding tetracaine has been limited to a single case report. In addition, little is known about the cause of these symptoms or the cofactors that affect their occurrence. The present study sought to determine whether the presence of phenylephrine or the concentration of glucose in the anesthetic solution affects the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 0.5% tetracaine. METHODS: One-hundred sixty patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled for elective surgery on a lower limb or perineum were sequentially assigned to one of four equal groups to receive intrathecal 0.5% tetracaine in 7.5% or 0.75% glucose, with or without 0.125% phenylephrine. Patients were evaluated on postoperative day one for the presence of pain, dysesthesia, or both in the legs or buttocks by an investigator unaware of the drug given. RESULTS: Symptoms were present in 10 patients (12.5%) receiving a spinal anesthetic containing phenylephrine, but in only one patient (1.3%) receiving spinal anesthesia without phenylephrine. There was no significant difference in the incidence of symptoms between groups receiving 7.5% glucose and those receiving 0.75% glucose (8.8% and 5% of patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that adding phenylephrine to tetracaine for spinal anesthesia increases the potential for transient neurologic symptoms, but that the concentration of glucose does not affect their occurrence.     

The anesthetic management of cesarean section for multiple pregnant patients

Anesthetic management of cesarean section for twenty multiple pregnant patients, who were pregnant with triplet or quadruplet, was compared with that for 325 single pregnant patients and 21 twin pregnant patients. For anesthetic methods, spinal anesthesia was chosen most frequently in the multiple pregnant patients, as in single and twin (more than 75 percent). In multiple pregnant patients, the incidence of emergency operation was less. In multiple pregnant patients who received spinal anesthesia, gestational age was lower; birth weight was lighter; length of fundus uteri was longer; and blood loss including amniotic fluid was larger. In triplets, the third infants' UID-time was prolonged and their Apgar score was lower.     

Spread of spinal anesthesia with 3 different hyperbaric solutions used in Japan

We studied the spread of spinal anesthesia with 3 different hyperbaric solutions commercially available in Japan. Percamin-S [0.3% dibucaine in 5% hyperbaric saline] (P), Neo-Percamin.S [0.24% dibucaine with 0.12% T-caine in 9.5% glucose] (N) and 0.5% Tetcaine [tetracaine] in 10% glucose (T) were studied. Two ml of each solution was administered intrathecally using a 25 gauge Quincke needle. Patients (n = 90) were allocated to one of 9 groups receiving 2 ml of P, N or T at L 2-3, L 3-4 or L 4-5 interspace. Both N and T produced significantly higher spread of analgesia than P at any of L 3-4 and L 4-5 interspaces. P and N have the same specific gravity, even though significant differences were found in spread of segmental analgesia. Local anesthesic agents and solvent solutions themselves are considered to influence the spread of spinal anesthesia as the specific gravity of hyperbaric solution does.     

Intrathecal fentanyl prolongs sensory bupivacaine spinal block

The purpose of investigation was to study the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the onset and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine-induced spinal block in adult male patients. Forty-three patients undergoing lower extremity or genitourinary surgery were enrolled to receive either 13.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% + 0.5 ml CSF it, (Group I) or 13.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.75% + 25 micrograms fentanyl it, (Group II) according to a randomized assessor-blind protocol. The onset and duration of sensory block were assessed by pinching the skin with forceps in the midclavicular line bilaterally every two minutes for first twenty minutes and then every five to ten minutes. Similarly, the onset and duration of motor block were assessed and graded at the same time intervals using the criteria described by Bromage. The time required for two sensory segment regression and sensory regression to L1 dermatome was 74 +/- 18 and 110 +/- 33 min vs 93 +/- 22 and 141 +/- 37 min in Groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.05). Intrathecal fentanyl did not enhance the onset of sensory or motor block, or prolong the duration of bupivacaine-induced motor spinal block. Fewer patients demanded pain relief in the fentanyl-treated group than in the control group in the early postoperative period (19% vs 59%; P < 0.05). Episodes of hypotension were more frequent in the fentanyl-treated group than in the control group (43% vs 14%; P < 0.05). We conclude that fentanyl, 25 micrograms it, prolonged the duration of bupivacaine-induced sensory block (sensory regression to L1 dermatone) by 28% and reduced the analgesic requirement in the early postoperative period following bupivacaine spinal block.     

Treatment of human pulmonary paragonimiasis with triclabendazole: clinical tolerance and drug efficacy

We report the anesthetic management of a patient with aortitis syndrome using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. A 28-year-old gravida with aortitis syndrome accompanied by faints was scheduled for an urgent cesarean section. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was thought to be better for this case in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by her consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change during surgery as compared to spinal or epidural anesthesia alone. After inserting an epidural catheter at the Th 12/L 1 interspace, spinal anesthesia was performed with 1.5 ml of 0.3% dibucaine at the L 4/L 5 interspace. The level of analgesia was under L 1 with the pinprick method 10 min after the spinal anesthesia. Next, 5 ml of 1.5% mepivacaine was injected through the epidural catheter. The level of analgesia reached to Th 6 without major hemodynamic changes. A healthy 2740 g infant was delivered and she had an uneventful recovery. We conclude that combined spinal and epidural anesthesia is useful in a patient with aortitis syndrome undergoing an urgent cesarean section in order to monitor the cerebral circulation by the consciousness level and to reduce the hemodynamic change.     

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma

PURPOSE: To determine the relative corneal endothelial toxicities of the following topical anesthetic agents: bupivacaine HCl 0.75%, unpreserved lidocaine HCl 4%, proparacaine HCl 0.5%, and tetracaine HCl 0.5%. METHODS: The experiment was conducted using pigmented rabbits. Approximately nine animals each were randomly assigned to eight groups. Right eyes received injections of 0.2 ml of one of the four anesthetic agents at one of two concentrations and left eyes received injections of 0.2 ml of balanced salt solution. Corneal thickness and clarity were measured before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in corneal thickness and opacification over preoperative measurements was noted with injections of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and proparacaine, controlling for changes occurring in control eyes from surgery alone. Proparacaine was statistically more toxic than were the others. The toxicity of tetracaine was statistically indistinguishable from balanced salt solution, although mild toxicity was evident clinically. Injection of 1:10 dilutions of the same anesthetic agents failed to produce a statistically significant increase in corneal thickness or opacification on any postoperative examination. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior chamber injection of bupivacaine HCl 0.75%, unpreserved lidocaine HCl 4%, and proparacaine HCl 0.5% produces corneal thickening and opacification that is clinically and statistically significant. Tetracaine HCl 0.5% injection produces corneal thickening and opacification that is clinically apparent in some eyes but statistically insignificant. Ophthalmic surgeons should be aware of the potential for endothelial cell injury if anesthetic agents enter or are injected into the eye during cataract surgery in the concentrations supplied commercially.     

The influence of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of subarachnoid block for caesarean section

Forty healthy parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean section were randomly allocated to receive either 0.3 ml 0.9% saline (control group, n = 20), or 15 micrograms (0.3 ml) fentanyl (treatment group, n = 20) added to 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine given intrathecally in the sitting position. A sensory block to T4 was achieved after 6.5 min in those who received fentanyl compared to 8.0 min in the control group; this was not significantly different. The highest level of sensory block achieved in both groups was similar. Ephedrine was required earlier (p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but the total requirement of ephedrine intra-operatively was similar. Fentanyl significantly improved the quality of intra-operative surgical anaesthesia as none of the patients in the treatment group complained of discomfort compared with seven in the control group (p < 0.05). Similarly those in the treatment group had better comfort scores as evaluated by visual analogue score (p < 0.01). Regression of anaesthesia to T12 took longer (184 vs 156 min, p < 0.05) in those who received fentanyl but this did not affect the total requirement of morphine in the first 24 h after operation. There was no difference in the incidence of side effects in the mother and no adverse effects were detected in the baby. The results indicate that adding 15 micrograms fentanyl to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia markedly improves intra-operative anaesthesia for Caesarean section.     

A comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block

The onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during an interscalene block are not known. The potentially improved safety profile of ropivacaine may allow the use of higher concentrations to try and speed onset time. We compared bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anesthetic and concentration for interscalene brachial plexus block. Seventy-five adult patients scheduled for outpatient shoulder surgery under interscalene block were entered into this double-blind, randomized study. Patients were assigned (n = 25 per group) to receive an interscalene block using 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.75% ropivacaine. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. At 1-min intervals after local anesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of shoulder abduction and loss of pinprick in the C5-6 dermatomes. Before discharge, patients were asked to document the time of first oral narcotic use, when incisional discomfort began, and when full sensation returned to the shoulder. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was <6 min in all groups. Duration of sensory blockade was similar in all groups as defined by the three recovery measures. We conclude that there is no clinically important difference in times to onset and recovery of interscalene block for bupivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5%, and ropivacaine 0.75% when injected in equal volumes. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we demonstrated a similar efficacy between equal concentrations of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In addition, increasing the concentration of ropivacaine from 0.5% to 0.75% fails to improve the onset or duration of interscalene brachial plexus block.     

Correction of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with a new type of offset apical instrumentation: preliminary results

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the approximate incidence of transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) [formerly known as transient radicular irritation (TRI)] associated with procaine spinal anesthesia, and whether fentanyl prolongs the duration of procaine spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Unrandomized pilot study. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 106 consecutive patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia for procedures anticipated to last less than 90 minutes. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received 5% procaine for spinal anesthesia. Fentanyl 20 micrograms was added for procedures anticipated to last longer than 45 minutes (but less than 90 min). Intraoperatively the adequacy of duration, level, and intensity of anesthesia were observed. Time from injection of local anesthetic until knee-bending was recorded. Three days postoperatively, patients were questioned intensively in an effort to determine whether back pain and/or symptoms consistent with TNS had occurred. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of anesthesia was adequate in all but one instance. The intensity and the sensory level of anesthesia were satisfactory with one exception, a woman who had an unexpectedly low sensory level (L1) after 60 mg of procaine for cerclage, and who was also was the only patients to develop TNS. The incidence of TNS (0.9%) was markedly less than that reported after lidocaine and similar to the incidence observed after bupivacaine. Mild back pain without radiation occurred in 11 patients (10%), an incidence that is similar to that seen after bupivacaine and lidocaine. Compared with procaine alone, the addition of fentanyl significantly (p = 0.0001) prolonged the time to bending knees from 72 minutes to 97 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Procaine may be a useful alternative to lidocaine for short procedures, and it is less likely to produce TNS. Fentanyl prolongs motor block when added to procaine.     

Concept of stress ulcer prevention. Is re-thinking necessary?

BACKGROUND: Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) has been considered to be better in temporal and dose flexibility, as well as hemodynamic stability than single dose spinal anesthesia. However, the failure of spinal anesthesia is not a rare experience for anesthesiologists. Here we present our experience in solving the problem and discuss the possible causes for the failure. METHODS: 236 cases were studied retrospectively from January to December in 1996. All were over 65 years old, ASA III, scheduled for transurethral procedures or orthopedic operation. CSA was performed with 0.2% bupivacaine. Failed CSA was confirmed by positive pin-prick test at T10 dermatome(umbilicus) 30 minutes after 20 mg bupivacaine was injected. For failed cases, 5 mL 1% lidocaine was injected intrathecally for rescue. The failure rate, sensory and motor blockade, success rate by changing to lidocaine and its dosage were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven of 236 cases (4.7%) were considered spinal failure since the initial 20 mg bupivacaine could not provide adequate T10 anesthesia in 30 minutes. Addition of 5 mL 1% lidocaine produced a profound sensory and motor blockade in 9 cases, while further lidocaine injection was required in two cases. The success rate by rescuing lidocaine was 100% with an average lidocaine consumption by 52.5 +/- 4.5 mg. DISCUSSION: Factors contributed to failure spinal anesthesia including failure of technique, errors of judgment, maldistribution and failure of local anesthetic itself. However, we thought that change of pH value of local anesthetic in CSF may play a great part in these failed CSAs. Despite the reasons for failure, we demonstrate that failure of continuous spinal anesthesia by 0.2% bupivacaine can be readily resolved by 1% lidocaine.