Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics

ABSTRACT

The grinding and polishing efficiency of self-glazed zirconia and Zenostar zirconia, prepared by wet and dry approaches, respectively, were evaluated. Each sample was divided into two subgroups (n?=?5). One was ground, and the other was polished by following the clinical adjustment protocol. Statistics were analysed by independent t-test to a significance level of p?<?.05. More material was ground off in self-glazed zirconia than in Zenostar zirconia (p?<?.05) during the same period, especially during the coarse grinding procedure (p?<?.05), whereas the grinding efficiency in fine grinding stage was not significantly different (p?>?.05). The polishing efficiency of the whole and of the fine polishing procedure of the two kinds of zirconia was significantly different (p?<?.05). It thus can be concluded that grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia is significantly higher than that of the conventional Zenostar zirconia.     

Adhesion of resin cements to contaminated zirconia resin cements on zirconia: effect saliva-contamination and surface conditioning

This study evaluated the adhesion of resin cements to zirconia after saliva contamination using resin cements with different chemistries. Zirconia discs (N?=?240, n?=?10 per group) were randomly divided into three groups: (a) C: No contamination (Control), (b) S: Contamination with saliva, (c) S?+?AA: Contamination with saliva followed by air-abrasion (CoJet). While half of the specimens were not conditioned, the other half were conditioned with 37.5% H₃PO₄ for 60?s. After rinsing, all specimen surfaces were silanized (Monobond Plus). Resin cements based on either methacrylate (Variolink II–VL) or MDP monomer (Panavia 21-PN) were polymerized on the substrates. The specimens were randomly divided into two further groups to be tested either after (a) 24?h dry storage at 37?°C or (b) thermocycling (×5000, 5–55?°C). Microshear bond (MSB) tests were conducted in a Universal Testing Machine and failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using Univariate analysis and Tukey’s tests (alpha = 0.05). While saliva contamination, 37.5% H₃PO₄ application (p?<?.001) and aging (p?<?.05) significantly affected the bond results, cement type did not show significant difference after aging (p?>?.05). Adhesive strength of PN (1.2–4.4?MPa) on saliva contaminated and etched zirconia was more stable than that of VL (0–2.8?MPa). After aging, bond strength results decreased the most with VL (3–100%) compared to PN (32–71%) but the decrease was less in the air-abraded groups after aging (VL: 3%; PN: 32%). Exclusively adhesive failures were experienced in all groups.     

Friction and wear behaviors of dental ceramics against natural tooth enamel

The friction and wear behaviors of dental ceramics against the natural tooth enamel were investigated. In this study three dental ceramics, namely zirconia with both polished and rough surfaces, hot-forged lithium disilicate glass ceramics and silicates based veneer porcelain were involved with two metallic materials, gold–palladium alloy and Nickel–chromium alloy, as references. The tribological tests were carried out under artificial saliva lubrication condition by using freshly extracted natural teeth and samples with controlled surface roughness. The frictional coefficients versus reciprocating cycles were recorded. Scanning Electron Microscopy was used to observe the topography of worn teeth enamel surfaces and antagonists. The frictional coefficient of enamel against gold palladium alloy or Nickel–chromium alloy was the smallest. The frictional coefficient of enamel against polished zirconia or porcelain was between that of metal and glass-ceramic. Upon surface polishing, frictional coefficient between zirconia and enamel was radically decreased. Furrows and granular debris were observed on the worn surfaces of enamel while sliding against the rough zirconia or glass ceramic, indicating a abrasive wear mechanism. While chipping flake and pit-like structure after stripping and crack were observed on the enamel surface while sliding against polished zirconia or Nickel–chromium alloy, indicating a type of fatigue wear. It appeared that the friction and wear performances of zirconia could be improved significantly by adequate surface polishing. This observation indicated that attention must be paid to carefully design proper occlusal surface contours and correctly choose dental materials in clinical practice.     

Effect of temporary cement removal methods from human dentin on zirconia-dentin adhesion

This study evaluated the effect of temporary cement residue removal methods from human coronary dentin on the bond strength of adhesively-luted zirconia on dentin. Forty non-carious human molars were embedded in acrylic resin and the dentin surfaces were exposed. Temporary acrylic crowns were provisionally cemented with zinc oxide cement without eugenol and stored in distilled water (37?°C/15?days). After crown removal, the excess temporary cement was removed from dentin according to one of the following cleaning methods: (n?=?8 per group): (a) air-water rinse (AW), (b) pumice paste (PP), (c) air-abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (Al₂O₃) (AA), (d) sodium bicarbonate spray (SB) or (e) glycine powder (CP). Forty zirconia cylinders were made and each cylinder was adhesively luted onto each tooth after adhesive resin (Scotch Bond Universal, 3?M ESPE-SBU) application using resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3?M ESPE) and photo-polymerized from each surface for 20?s. The bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37?°C) for 90?days. The bonded interface was loaded under shear (1?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α?=?0.05). Mean bond strength was significantly affected by the cleaning method (p?=?0.0289). Cleaning with AA method resulted in significantly higher bond strength than with SB (p?<?0.05) but similar to CP, PP and AW (p?>?0.05). All cleaning methods were effective in removing temporary resin cement from dentin surfaces. Air-abrasion with aluminum oxide particles was more effective than with sodium bicarbonate spray promoting adhesion between zirconia and dentin.     

Fatigue and fracture resistance of minimally invasive ceramic and resin composite veneers with different designs bonded adhesively to severely eroded teeth

This study evaluated the load bearing capacity of minimal invasive restoration alternatives on severely worn teeth after cyclic loading. Sound human maxillary incisors (N?=?72, n?=?9 per group) were randomly divided into nine experimental groups to receive one of the following restoration types: Group 1: Intact tooth, Group 2: Direct resin composite, Group 3: Lingual: Indirect resin composite, Labial: Ceramic veneer with lingual overlap, Group 4: Lingual: Indirect resin composite with lingual overlap, Labial: Ceramic, Group 5: Lingual: Direct composite, Labial: Ceramic, Group 6: Lingual: Feldspathic Ceramic, Labial: Feldspathic ceramic, Group 7: Lithium disilicate crown, Group 8: Metal-ceramic crown. Teeth were prepared simulating erosion/wear conditions. Specimens were subjected to cyclic loading (1,200,000 cycles, 5–55?°C) and then loaded to failure from the lingual surface at 105° inclination (1?mm/min). Data (Newton) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey`s tests and Weibull moduli were calculated (α?=?0.05). Significant differences were observed between the groups for the initial (p?=?0.006) and maximum fracture load (p?=?0.002). Group 3 (55?±?36) presented significantly lower initial fracture load compared to other groups (79?±?35–134?±?36) (p?<?0.05). When maximum fracture load is considered, control group (1) (602?±?355) and from restored groups 2 (449?±?144) and 4 (495?±?291) showed significantly higher results (p?<?0.05). Weibull modulus for the maximum fracture load was the highest for Group 2 (m?=?3.47) among all groups (m?=?1.61–4.18). Groups 2, 3, 6 presented the highest incidence of repairable failures. Based on the results, severely worn teeth could be restored with lingual direct resin composite and labial veneering with indirect resin with overlap.     

Prime-and-rinse approach for improving the enamel micro-tensile bond strengths of self-etch adhesives

The study investigated the effects of prime-and-rinse approach using 15% MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate)-containing primer on the enamel micro-tensile bond strengths (MTBS) of (ultra-) mild self-etch adhesives, enamel surfaces and enamel-resin interfaces. The buccal enamel surfaces of 69 human third molars were polished and randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (control, self-etch approach): Polished enamel surfaces were not further pre-treated. The enamel surfaces were acid-etched (Group B, (selective) enamel etching) or primed with 15% MDP-containing primer (Group C, prime-and-rinse approach) for 15?s and thoroughly water-sprayed. The enamel surfaces were applied with self-etch adhesives and placed with composite resins (Adper Easy One?+?Filtek Z350 (3?M ESPE); Clearfil S3 Bond?+?Clearfil Majesty (Kuraray-Noritake Co.); G Bond?+?Gradia Direct (GC); iBond?+?Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer)), respectively. The specimens were prepared for MTBS test and scanning/transmission electron microscopy observations. Compared with group A, groups B and C produced significantly higher enamel MTBS (p?<?.01), regardless of the adhesives used. Groups B and C possessed similar enamel MTBS (p?>?.05). The SEM findings showed that smear layer remained on the polished enamel surface was completely removed by acid etching and almost completely removed by prime-and-rinse approach. The TEM microphotographs reveal that smear layer was detectable at the resin-enamel interface in group A, not in groups B and C. The novel prime-and-rinse approach using MDP-containing primer before the application of (ultra-) mild self-etch adhesives could greatly increase the enamel MTBS. That might be an alternative to selective enamel etching.     

Effects of chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of resin composite to different mineral trioxide aggregate based cements

This study investigated the adhesion of resin composite to mineral trioxide aggregate based cements after different chemical and physico-chemical surface conditioning methods. Mineral trioxide aggregate based cements (Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, Imicryl MTA) were embedded in Teflon disks (N?=?180). After storing at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 72?h, substrate surfaces were polished using silicon carbide papers. Specimens were allocated to 3 groups to be conditioned with one of the following (n?=?15 per group): a) Adhesive resin (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE), b) Adhesive resin (Adper Single Bond 2, SB2), c) air-abrasion with 30?μm alumina coated with silica?+?silane?+?adhesive resin (ALB), d) no surface conditioning, control group (CON). Microhybrid resin composite (Filtek Z250) was applied on the conditioned substrate surfaces and photo-polymerized. After storage at 37?°C at 100% humidity for 24?h, adhesive interfaces were loaded under shear (1?mm/min) in a universal testing machine. After debonding failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). SBS results were significantly affected by surface conditioning (p?<?0.05) and materials (p?<?0.05). Interaction terms were significant (p?<?0.05). Biodentine-ALB resulted in significantly higher SBS values (3.96?±?1.24) compared to those of other combinations, while ALB and SB2 resulted in no significant difference for ProRoot MTA and Imicryl MTA (p?>?.05). CSE (1.36?±?0.5- 1.98?±?0.76) did not significantly increase SBS for all MTA materials compared to the control group (0.8?±?0.52 – 2?±?0.91) (p?>?9.05). While CON groups resulted in exclusively adhesive failures, ALB presented the highest incidence of mixed failures for all materials tested (60–100%).     

Effect of different air-abrasion protocols on topography,surface wettability and adhesion of MDP monomer-based resin cement to zirconia

This study evaluated the effect of air-abrasion protocols on the topography, surface wettability and adhesion of resin cement to zirconia. Ceramic specimens (N?=?49; n?=?7) (15?mm × 2?mm) were randomly allocated to seven groups to be treated with: (1) Air-abrasion with 45?μm Al₂O₃ (A45), (2) 80?μm Al₂O₃ (A80), (3) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (CoJet) (C30), (4) 30?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Soft) (R30), (5) 110?μm Al₂O₃ coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec Plus) (R110); (6) R110R30 (Rocatec) (R110R30) and (7) control, no conditioning (NC). Air-abrasion was performed using a chairside air-abrasion device (2.5?bar, 10?mm, 90?s). Contact angle measurements were performed using goniometry (n?=?5). MDP-based dual resin cement (Panavia F2.0) was bonded on four locations after air-abrasion protocols (n?=?20 per group). Half of the specimens were tested after 24?h and the other half after thermal cycling (×3000, 5–55?°C). Data were analyzed using 1-, 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (alpha = 0.05). Significantly lower contact angle values were observed for groups C30 (62.6?±?0.91), R30 (61.91?±?1.05) and R110R30 (61.54?±?1.02) compared to those of other groups (65.5?±?0.9–110.61?±?0.9) (p?<?0.05). In dry conditions, surface conditioning methods tested did not show significant effect on bond strength (MPa) (10.57?±?1.42–16.86?±?2.54) (p?=?0.238). After thermocycling, bond strength results decreased significantly (p?<?0.05) (12.6–51.2%). R110 (7.18?±?1.34) and A80 (4.92?±?1.53) showed significantly higher bond strength compared to other groups (2.13?±?0.73–4.16?±?1.34) (p?<?0.05). The best wettability and adhesion results with MDP-based resin cement to zirconia was achieved with A80 and R110 air-abrasion.     

A study of compressive strength between zirconia framework and veneering ceramic as a function of thermal expansion coefficient using Shell–Nielsen test method

This study investigated the adhesion between zirconia framework and four veneering ceramic (VC) materials with varying coefficients of thermal expansions (CTE). Zirconia rods (N?=?40) (ICE Zirkon) (diameter: 4 mm, height: 20 mm) were milled and sintered. After firing, the zirconia rods were air-abraded and cleaned. They were randomly assigned to receive four VCs (n?=?10/group), namely (a) Vita VM9 (VZ; 9–9.2?×?10^?6? K^?1), (b) Cerabien ZR (CZ; 9.1?×?10^?6 K^?1), (c) Matchmaker ZR (MM; 9.4?×?10^?6?K^?1), and (d) Ice Zirconia Ceramic (IZ; 9.6?×?10^?6?K^?1). The VCs were then fired onto zirconia rods (height: 2 mm, thickness: 2 mm) circumferentially and were thermocycled for 6000 times (5/55 °C, dwell time: 30?s). Specimens were loaded from the top of the zirconia rods (0.5 mm/min) in a universal testing machine until debonding. Shell–Nielsen bond strength values were calculated (MPa). Failure types were evaluated under SEM. The data were statistically analyzed (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s; α?=?0.05). Weibull distribution values including the Weibull modulus (m) (0.05) was calculated. The highest mean bond strength (MPa) was obtained for CZ (42.08?±?4.08), followed by VZ (41.77?±?4.92), MM (40.7?±?3.64), and IZ (40.05?±?5.78). While mean bond strength for VZ, MM, and IZ were not significantly different (p?>?0.05), CZ was significantly higher than that of IZ (p?<?0.05). The lowest shape value was for VZ (m?=?16.94) and the highest for MM (m?=?20.16). Mainly, adhesive failures followed by mixed failures were observed. VCs with a greater mismatch of CTE with the zirconia framework exhibited similar Shell–Nielsen bond strength to those with fewer mismatches. CTE mismatch did not affect the results of CZ (9.1?×?10^?6 K^?1) and IZ (9.6?×?10^?6 K^?1).     

Adhesion potential of relining materials to polyamide and PMMA-based denture base materials: effect of surface conditioning methods

This study evaluated the bond strength of relining materials to different denture base materials polyamide and polymethylmethacrylate denture base materials after various surface conditioning methods. Denture base resin specimens (N?=?128; n?=?8 per group) (10?×?10?×?2.5?mm³) were fabricated out of injection-moulded thermoplastic polyamide resin (POL) (Deflex) and heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA, Dura Dent) (HC). The specimens were randomly divided into 4 main groups according to different surface conditioning methods: (a) No conditioning, control (C), (b) grinding with green stone (G), (c) application of primer (V), (d) silica coating with Al₂O₃ particles coated with SiO₂ (Rocatec) (R). Half of the specimens in each group received auto-polymerized hard relining resin (GC, GC Reline Hard) and the other half PMMA based relining resin (SC, Dura Dent). After thermocycling (×5000), the bonded specimens were tested under tensile forces (0.5?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests (alpha = 0.05). Bond strength of relining resins were significantly higher to PMMA than to POL, regardless of the conditioning method (p?<?0.05). While R positively affected the bond strength results (p?<?0.05) (4.99?±?1.65–3.27?±?1.31), application V or G did not show significant effect to POL-relining resin adhesion. After R conditioning, bond strength values were significantly higher in HC-GC group (7.48?±?2.32) than POL-GC group (3.27?±?1.31) (p?<?0.05). Adhesion of auto-polymerized relining materials to thermoplastic polyamide or polymethylmethacrylate denture resins could be improved after surface conditioning with silica-coating.     

Evaluation of different desensitizing agents effect on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin

Desensitizing agents can inhibit the bonding strength between dentin and adhesive resin cement. This study evaluated the effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Sixty freshly extracted and caries free teeth were classified into five experimental groups, randomly (n?=?12). Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Teethmate, Shield Force Plus, Admira Protect and Ultra-Ez) respectively, except for an untreated control group. After desensitizing agents and adhesive resin cement were applied to each dentin surface, all specimens were stored in incubator at 37?°C for 24?h. The shear bond strength was tested with a Universal testing machine at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analysed by using a statistical software (SPSS 22). The results of the measurements were analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and multiple comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test (p???.01). Specimens were examined by a scanning electron microscope, additionally. The Shield Force Plus showed significantly the highest shear bond strength compared with other groups (p?<?.01). Ultra-Ez showed the lowest shear bond strength (p?>?.01). There was no significant difference among Teethmate and Admira Protect groups (p?>?.01). Desensitizing agents containing resin monomers increased the bonding strength, however desensitizers containing calcium phosphate, potassium nitrate and fluoride did not effect the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin.     

Degree of conversion and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements with phosphonic or phosphoric acid acrylate to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin

This study evaluated the degree of conversion (DC) and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin. Single-rooted teeth (N?=?24, n?=?12 per group) were cut at the cement–enamel junction (CEJ), endodontically treated and post space (depth?=?8 mm) was prepared. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to the resin cements: (a) Group ML: methacrylate-based cement with phosphonic acid acrylate (Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent); (b) Group RXU: methacrylate-based cement with phosphoric acid acrylate (RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, 3 M ESPE). Fiber-reinforced composite root posts (RelyX Fiber Post, 3 M ESPE) were cemented according to the manufacturers’ instructions of the resin cements. Root slices of 2-mm thickness (n?=?3 per tooth) were cut below the CEJ 1, 3, and 5 mm apically. The DC of each section was analyzed with micro-Raman spectrometer and push-out test was performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). After debonding, all specimens were analyzed using optical microscope to categorize the failure modes. While data (MPa) were statistically evaluated using Kruskal Wallis, Mann–Whitney U tests for DC data 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used (α?=?0.05). Regardless of the resin cement type, the mean push-out bond strength results (MPa), were significantly higher for the coronal slices (ML: 9.1?±?2.7; RXU: 7.3?±?4.1) than those of the most apical ones (ML: 7?±?4.9; RXU: 2.89?±?1.5) (p?=?0.002). Resin cement type and (p?p?=?0.002) significantly affected the DC values, while the interaction terms were not significant (p?=?0.606). Overall, DC was significantly higher for ML (67?±?8.2%) than RXU (26?±?8.8%) (p?相似文献   

Bonding of novel self-glazed zirconia dental ceramics

ABSTRACT

Bonding behaviours of a novel self-glazed zirconia dental material were investigated. The effect of a preformed porous nanoceramic bonding surface and the different cleansing methods on saliva-contaminated bonding surfaces was assessed in this in vitro study. Cleaning procedures commonly used in dental offices were tested. All specimens demonstrated adhesive fracture patterns except for airborne particle abrasion group, which resulted in mixed-type fracture pattern and the highest bonding force values. No statistically significant differences in bonding force values were found between self-glazed zirconia with and without a preformed porous nanoceramic bonding surface when bonded with the self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX? Unicem 2). Scanning electron micrographs revealed no interaction between the bonding surface and the resin cement after priming. Mechanical retention is the predominant bonding mechanism between the bonding surface and the luting resin cement.     

Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhesives in class II resin restorations

Aim: The aim was to compare the microleakage of resin composite bonded with different adhesive systems in class-II cavities at enamel or dentine margins. Material and methods: 60 extracted human molar teeth received slot cavity preparations on mesial and distal surfaces (mesial cervical margin was prepared in enamel and distal in dentine). They were randomly divided into five groups (n?=?12) according to the adhesive system: Group-A: Silorane Bond (S), Group-B: Adper Single Bond 2 (SB), Group-C: Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), Group-D: Single Bond Universal (USel) (selective etch-and-rinse), Group-E: Single Bond Universal (USE) (all-in-one). The preparations were restored using the same resin composite (Filtek Ultimate) except Group A which was restored by Silorane composite. The teeth were thermocycled, immersed in dye, sectioned, and dye penetration was evaluated quantitatively using image analysis. The data were analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test. Results: In all groups, there was no statistically significant difference between enamel margins at occlusal and gingival sites (p?>?0.05). The statistical difference between Group-A (S) and Group-B (SB) was significant at all margins. Group-B (SB) presented the greatest microleakage amounts at all margins and the highest scores were obtained in the dentine. Likewise, SB demonstrated statistically significant differences between dentine and enamel margins (occlusal and gingival)(p?<?0.05). Conclusion: All adhesive systems showed similar microleakage values between enamel margins in occlusal and gingival regions. However, when the gingival margin is located in the dentine, etch&rinse adhesive systems may not be a choice in terms of microleakage prevention.     

Adhesion of resin cement to contemporary hybrid ceramic and polymeric CAD/CAM materials: effect of conditioning methods and ageing

This study assessed the effect of different surface conditioning methods and ageing protocols on adhesion of resin cement to hybrid ceramic and polymeric CAD/CAM materials. CAD/CAM materials (n?=?360, n?=?30 per group), namely (a) Lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD-LIS), (b) Zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD-ZIR), (c) Polymer (Lava Ultimate-LAV), (d) Polymer infiltrated ceramic network (Enamic-ENA), (e) Polymer infiltrated ceramic (Experimental-1-CS1), (f) Polymer infiltrated ceramic (Experimental-2-CS2), (g) Lithium disilicate reinforced alumina (n!ce-NIC) were cut into slices (3?×?6 × 8?mm³) and conditioned: (a) Method 1: 5% hydrofluoric acid etching (H)+silane and (b) Method 2: Silica coating (CoJet (A)+silane). Group LIS was conditioned with only Method 1 and Group ZIR only with Method 2 (control). Resin cement (Variolink Esthetic II) was bonded onto the conditioned specimens and photopolymerized. One-half of the specimens was subjected to ageing (thermocycling 5–55°, 5000 cycles) and the other half was stored in distilled water (37?°C, 24?h). The resin-substrate interface was loaded under shear forces in a Universal Testing Machine (1?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey`s tests (α?=?0.05). Substrate type, conditioning method and ageing had a significant effect on adhesion values (p?<?.05). In aged conditions, ENA-H, ENA-A, LAV-H, LAV-A, CS2-A (15?±?4 – 11.6?±?5) showed no significant difference (p?>?.05), with the CS2-A (15?±?4) showing the least reduction (5.5%) compared to all other groups (5.8–62.6%). CS1-A (100%) followed by ENA-H, ENA-A (93%), CS2-A (80%) presented the highest incidence of cohesive failures after ageing.     

Wear behavior of silica-infiltrated monolithic zirconia: Effects on the mechanical properties and surface characterization

The objective of this study was to assess the wear behavior and its effects on the flexural strength of silica-infiltrated zirconia compared to glaze and polishing finishing treatments. To do so, disc-shaped samples of a second-generation zirconia were prepared and divided into three groups: silica infiltration, glazing, or polishing. Half of the samples of each finishing were subjected to sliding wear testing using a steatite antagonist. The discs and antagonists had their volume loss measured. The wear-tested and the other half of samples were subjected to biaxial flexural strength testing and the following characterization analyses were also performed: roughness, hardness, X-ray diffraction, profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were evaluated with ANOVA and Weibull analyses. Glazing caused greater antagonist volume loss, followed by silica infiltration, and polishing. Silica-infiltrated zirconia surface was similarly worn to polished, which was lower than that for glazed zirconia. Polished zirconia presented the highest flexural strength. However,the strength decreased and became similar in all worn groups. Silica infiltration showed slightly lower characteristic strength after sliding wear. The highest roughness and hardness values were observed on glazed zirconia. These values decreased after wear testing and became similar to the other groups. SEM evidenced an irregular surface for glazing. No phase transformation occurred after sliding wear. Despite producing some volume loss on zirconia and antagonist surfaces, silica infiltration is a promising alternative for finishing monolithic restorations. Moreover, the damage caused by sliding wear leads to decreasing the strength of zirconia regardless of the surface finishing.     

Influence of phosphoric acid etching on the dentin bond durability of universal adhesives

This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (MSBS) of three universal adhesives and a three-step conventional adhesive to dentin after 24-hour and one-year storage in water. A new fluoride-releasing universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick: CUQ) and two commercially available adhesives (ScotchBond Universal: SBU and All-Bond Universal: ABU) were evaluated with phosphoric acid etching (PA-etch mode) or without it (self-etch mode). All-Bond 3 (AB3) served as control group. After bonding composite cylinders to dentin discs obtained from caries-free human teeth, the specimens were stored in deionized water at 37?°C for either 24 hours or one year (n?=?14) before MSBS measurement. Two-way ANOVA analysis of the results showed that the adhesives, storage time and their interactions had a significant effect on MSBS (p?<?0.01). In self-etch mode, there was no significant difference among universal adhesives at the baseline. In PA-etch, the CUQ and SBU showed significantly higher MSBS compared with AB3 (p?<?0.05). At baseline, no difference was found between the two modes for each universal adhesive (p?>?0.05). After one year, CUQ in self-etch mode showed a slight increase in nominal MSBS (p?>?0.05) and Weibull characteristic strength, which was significantly higher than SBU and ABU in the corresponding mode. There was no difference among the three universal adhesives in PA-etch mode after one year (p?>?0.05). In conclusion, the durability and reliability of dentin bonding with universal adhesives in different application modes depended on the material; and the self-etch approach showed promising results for the tested fluoride-releasing universal adhesive.     

Influence of different surface treatments on zirconia/resin shear bond strength using one-bottle universal adhesive

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different treatments on the zirconia/resin shear bond strength (SBS) using commercial one-bottle universal adhesive. Zirconia discs with different surface treatments (blank control; airborne-particle-abrasion; glazing) were bonded to the bovine enamel surfaces using one-bottle universal adhesive. All specimens were tested for SBS (MPa) before and after 10000 thermocycles. Statistically analysis were conducted by using one-way analysis of variance and multiple-comparison least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). Airborne-particle-abrasion group showed higher SBS (36.19 ± 11.86) than control group (14.98 ± 5.90) and glazing group (10.63 ± 5.39) (p < 0.05). After thermocycling test, the SBS significantly decreased for control group (8.84 ± 2.55) and glazing group (6.18 ± 2.78) while not for airborne-particle-abrasion group (41.5 ± 7.95). One-bottle universal adhesives combined with airborne-particle-abrasion showed quite high SBS of zirconia/resin, which was appropriate for bonding of zirconia restoration.     

Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives for use with artificially demineralized enamel,with and without pre-etching

The aim of this study was to investigate the microshear bond strength of five universal adhesives for use with demineralized enamel, with and without pre-etching. Using five universal adhesives (Single Bond Universal (SBU), Clearfil Universal (CU), Prime&Bond Elect Universal (PBU), Bisco All Bond Universal (ABU), Gluma Bond Universal (GU)), composite cylinders were bonded to the labial surfaces of extracted upper incisor teeth, with or without pre-etching. A micro-shear bond strength test was performed. The debonding surfaces were evaluated with the use of SEM. The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Post-hoc tests. SBU, ABU, and PBU increased the bond strength statistically when used in etch&rinse mode (p?<?0.05). GU and CU did not change the bond strength statistically with the use of pre-etching (p?>?0.05). The bond strength of universal adhesives on demineralized enamel, with and without initial acid etching, depends on the type of adhesive system used.     

Evaluation of the effects of different remineralizing agents on Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of different remineralization methods that are well established in clinical and daily use on S. mutans biofilm adhesion. In this study 72 human third molars were used. From each tooth two pieces of 4?mm x 7?mm enamel blocks were acquired. The samples were divided into 6 groups in which include 10 samples per time period (24h and 48?h) and for each remineralization method; control, flouride, ozone, CPP-ACP, arginine, novamin. After remineralization procedures, enamel surfaces were covered with saliva. 10⁵ CFU/mL of active S. mutans culture were inoculated onto the samples. S. mutans colonies were counted with Plate Count Agar (PCA) decimal dilution method. Micromorphologic effects of different remineralization methods were observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The most S. mutans biofilm formation for both time periods was observed in the control group whereas the less biofilm adhesion was showed in the arginine group. There were no statistically significant differences among remineralization agents (p?>?0.05). In the control group there was statistical difference between 24?h and 48?h (p?<?0.005) but in the other study groups there were no significant difference between the time periods (p?>?0.05). Remineralization agents did not significant differ on S. mutans biofilm adhesion.