Liquefaction Resistance of Clean and Nonplastic Silty Sands Based on Cone Penetration Resistance

Liquefaction of granular soil deposits is one of the major causes of loss resulting from earthquakes. The accuracy in the assessment of the likelihood of liquefaction at a site affects the safety and economy of the design. In this paper, curves of cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) versus cone penetration test (CPT) stress-normalized cone resistance qc1 are developed from a combination of analysis and laboratory testing. The approach consists of two steps: (1) determination of the CRR as a function of relative density from cyclic triaxial tests performed on samples isotropically consolidated to 100 kPa; and (2) estimation of the stress-normalized cone resistance qc1 for the relative densities at which the soil liquefaction tests were performed. A well-tested penetration resistance analysis based on cavity expansion analysis was used to calculate qc1 for the various soil densities. A set of 64 cyclic triaxial tests were performed on specimens of Ottawa sand with nonplastic silt content in the range of 0–15% by weight, and relative densities from loose to dense for each gradation, to establish the relationship of the CRR to the soil state and fines content. The resulting (CRR)7.5-qc1 relationship for clean sand is consistent with widely accepted empirical relationships. The (CRR)7.5-qc1 relationships for the silty sands depend on the relative effect of silt content on the CRR and qc1. It is shown that the cone resistance increases at a higher rate with increasing silt content than does liquefaction resistance, shifting the (CRR)7.5-qc1 curves to the right. The (CRR)7.5-qc1 curves proposed for both clean and silty sands are consistent with field observations.     

Effects of Nonplastic Fines on the Liquefaction Resistance of Sands

A laboratory parametric study utilizing cyclic triaxial tests was performed to clarify the effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction susceptibility of sands. Studies previously published in the literature have reported what appear to be conflicting results as to the effects of silt content on the liquefaction susceptibility of sandy soils. The current study has shown that if the soil structure is composed of silt particles contained within a sand matrix, the resistance to liquefaction of the soil is controlled by the relative density of the soil and is independent of the silt content of the soil. For soils whose structure is composed of sand particles suspended within a silt matrix, the resistance to liquefaction is again controlled by the relative density of the soil, but is lower than for soils with sand-dominated matrices at similar relative densities. In this case, the resistance to liquefaction is essentially independent of the amount and type of sand. These findings suggest the need for further evaluation of the effects of nonplastic fines content upon penetration resistance, and the manner in which this relationship affects the simplified methods currently used in engineering practice to evaluate the liquefaction resistance of silty soils.     

Influence of Nonplastic Fines on Shear Wave Velocity-Based Assessment of Liquefaction

Many false positives (no liquefaction detected when the normalized shear wave velocity-cyclic stress ratio (Vs1-CSR) combination indicated that it should have been) are observed in the database used in the simplified liquefaction assessment procedure based on shear wave velocity. Two possible reasons for false positives are the presence of a thick surface layer of nonliquefiable soil and the effects of fines on cyclic shear resistance (CRR) and Vs1. About 67% of the false positives that could not have been caused by an overlying thick surface layer are associated with silty sands with less than 35% fines. The effects of fines on the liquefaction resistance of silty sands and on the shear wave velocity are analyzed. Theoretical CRRfield?versus?Vs1 curves for silty sands containing 0 to 15% nonplastic fines are established. They show that the theoretical CRR-Vs1 correlations for silty sands with 5 to 15% nonplastic fines are all located to the far left of the semi-empirical curves that separate liquefaction from no-liquefaction zones in the simplified liquefaction potential assessment procedures. The results suggest the currently used shear wave velocity-based liquefaction potential curves may be overly conservative when applied to sands containing nonplastic fines.     

Verification of the Soil-Type Specific Correlation between Liquefaction Resistance and Shear-Wave Velocity of Sand by Dynamic Centrifuge Test

Liquefaction of granular soil deposits is one of the major causes of loss resulting from earthquakes. The accuracy of the liquefaction potential assessment at a site affects the safety and economy of an engineering project. Although shear-wave velocity (Vs)-based methods have become prevailing, very few works have addressed the problem of the reliability of various relationships between liquefaction resistance (CRR) and Vs used in practices. In this paper, both cyclic triaxial and dynamic centrifuge model tests were performed on saturated Silica sand No. 8 with Vs measurements using bender elements to investigate the reliability of the CRR-Vs1 correlation previously proposed by the authors. The test results show that the semiempirical CRR-Vs1 curve derived from laboratory liquefaction test of Silica sand No. 8 can accurately classify the (CRR,Vs1) database produced by dynamic centrifuge test of the same sand, while other existing correlations based on various sandy soils will significantly under or overestimate the cyclic resistance of this sand. This study verifies that CRR-Vs1 curve for liquefaction assessment is strongly soil-type dependent, and it is necessary to develop site-specific liquefaction resistance curves from laboratory cyclic tests for engineering practices.     

Monotonic and Cyclic Liquefaction of Very Loose Sands with High Silt Content

The results from an experimental study on sands with high nonplastic silt content are presented. Drained and undrained triaxial compression tests, undrained cyclic triaxial tests, and drained∕undrained instability tests were performed on specimens of loose Nevada sand with 40% silt content. The behavior was observed to be somewhat different from previously published tests with sands at lower silt content. The greater silt content appears to provide a more volumetrically contractive response throughout the entire stress-strain curve. However, some aspects of the response were similar to sands with lower silt content. Monotonic undrained tests indicated “reverse” behavior, i.e., static liquefaction occurred at low confining pressures and increasing dilatant volume-change tendency was observed with increasing confining pressure. Analyzing the results using the concepts of steady state resulted in a unique steady-state line only when undrained tests were sheared from the same isotropic compression line. When specimens of different initial densities were tested at the same initial confining pressures, the resulting steady-state points did not fall on the same steady-state line.     

Liquefaction, Cyclic Mobility, and Failure of Silt

It is known that the mechanical properties of low-plasticity silt are similar to those of sand, and yet silts are frequently used as coastal reclamation materials in many cities and industrial areas and will thus be susceptible to liquefaction. Samples of a low-plasticity silt have been tested under monotonic and cyclic loading under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions to characterize liquefaction, cyclic failure, and to develop an empirical model describing its cyclic strength. A sedimentation technique produced samples that had the highest susceptibility to liquefaction. Contractive behavior of monotonically loaded samples was triggered when the stress path reached an initial phase transformation (IPT) in both compression and extension tests. The samples became dilative after reaching a phase transformation (PT) point. The cyclic shear behavior of the silt samples prepared using the sedimentation method and consolidated at various initial sustained deviator stress ratios was examined in terms of two different failure criteria: a double amplitude axial strain εa,DA = 5% for reversal conditions; or axial plastic strain εa,P = 5% for nonreversal. For isotropically consolidated samples the initial phase transformation determined from undrained monotonic extension tests was the boundary between stable and contractive behavior. For anisotropically consolidated samples failure was defined by a bounding surface formed by undrained monotonic compression tests. An empirical model was developed relating the number of cycles to failure under conditions of both liquefaction and cyclic mobility to the initial anisotropic sustained deviator stress and cyclic deviator stress ratio.     

Laboratory Investigation on Assessing Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils by Shear Wave Velocity

Shear wave velocity (Vs) offers engineers a promising alternative tool to evaluate liquefaction resistance of sandy soils, and the lack of sufficient in-situ databases makes controlled laboratory study very important. In this study, semitheoretical considerations were first given based on review of previous liquefaction studies, which predicted a possible relationship between laboratory cyclic resistance ratio (CRRtx) and Vs normalized with respect to the minimum void ratio, confining stress and exponent n of Hardin equation. Undrained cyclic triaxial tests were then performed on three reconstituted sands with Vs measured by bender elements, which verified this soil-type-dependent relationship. Further investigation on similar laboratory studies resulted in a database of 291 sets of data from 34 types of sandy soils, based on which the correlation between liquefaction resistance and Vs was established statistically and further converted to equivalent field conditions with well-defined parameters, revealing that CRR will vary proportionally with (Vs1)4. Detailed comparisons with Vs-based site-specific investigations show that the present lower-bound CRR–Vs1 curve is a reliable prediction especially for sites with higher CSR or Vs1. The framework of liquefaction assessment based on the present laboratory study is proposed for engineering practice.     

Use of Artificial Neural Networks in the Prediction of Liquefaction Resistance of Sands

A backpropagation artificial neural network (ANN) model has been developed to predict the liquefaction cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) of sands using data from several laboratory studies involving undrained cyclic triaxial and cyclic simple shear testing. The model was verified using data that was not used for training as well as a set of independent data available from laboratory cyclic shear tests on another soil. The observed agreement between the predictions and the measured CRR values indicate that the model is capable of effectively capturing the liquefaction resistance of a number of sands under varying initial conditions. The predicted CRR values are mostly sensitive to the variations in relative density thus confirming the ability of the model to mimic the dominant dependence of liquefaction susceptibility on soil density already known from field and experimental observations. Although it is common to use mechanics-based approaches to understand fundamental soil response, the results clearly demonstrate that non-mechanistic ANN modeling also has a strong potential in the prediction of complex phenomena such as liquefaction resistance.     

Liquefaction Testing of Stratified Silty Sands

The cyclic behavior of stratified silty sandy soils is at present poorly understood, yet these materials are commonly found in alluvial deposits and hydraulic fill, which have a history of liquefaction during earthquakes. The main objective of this research project was to compare the behavior of stratified and homogeneous silty sands during seismic liquefaction conditions for various silt contents and confining pressures. A comprehensive experimental program was undertaken in which a total of 150 stress-controlled undrained cyclic triaxial tests were performed. Two methods of sample preparation were used for each soil type. These methods included moist tamping (representing uniform soil conditions) and sedimentation (representing layered soil conditions). The silt contents ranged from 10 to 50%, and confining pressures in the range of 50 to 250 KPa were considered. The results indicated that the liquefaction resistances of layered and uniform soils are not significantly different, despite the fact that the soil fabric produced by the two methods of sample preparation is totally different. The findings of this study justify applying the laboratory test results to the field conditions for the range of variables studied.     

Characterization of Liquefaction Susceptibility of Sands by Means of Extreme Void Ratios and/or Void Ratio Range

The liquefaction susceptibility of various graded fine to medium saturated sands are evaluated by stress controlled cyclic triaxial laboratory tests. Cyclic triaxial tests are performed on reconstituted specimens having global relative density of 60%. In all cyclic triaxial tests, loading pattern is selected as a sinusoidal wave form with 1.0 Hz frequency and effective consolidation pressure is chosen as 100 kPa. Liquefaction resistance is defined as the required cyclic stress ratio causing initial liquefaction in 10 cycles during the cyclic triaxial test. The results are used to draw conclusions on the effect of the extreme void ratios and void ratio range on the liquefaction resistance of various graded sands.     

Liquefaction of Silts and Silt-Clay Mixtures

Low plasticity silts and silty clays occur extensively in the central United States. For evaluating their liquefaction potential during an earthquake, no guidelines are available based on their density, void ratio, plasticity index, standard penetration values, or any other simple soil property. Their liquefaction behavior is not properly understood at present and is often confused with that of sand-silt mixtures. Pore water pressures and liquefaction in silt and silt-clay mixtures are discussed, and the influences of plasticity index on their cyclic strength are reviewed critically. It is concluded that considerable additional work is needed to fully understand the liquefaction behavior of these soils.     

Coupled Use of Cone Tip Resistance and Small Strain Shear Modulus to Assess Liquefaction Potential

Resistance against earthquake-related liquefaction is usually assessed using relationships between an index of soil strength such as normalized cone tip resistance and the cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) developed from observed field performance. The alternative approach based on laboratory testing is rarely used, mainly because of the apprehension that laboratory results may not reflect field behavior since the quality of laboratory data is often compromised by sampling disturbance. In this study, a database of laboratory data obtained mainly from cyclic testing of frozen (undisturbed) samples and in situ index measurements from near sampling locations comprised of cone tip resistance, qc, and shear wave velocity, Vs, have been assembled. These data indicate that neither normalized cone tip resistance nor normalized shear wave velocity individually correlate well with laboratory-measured CRR. However, the ratio of qc to the small strain shear modulus, G0, relates reasonably with CRR via separate correlations depending on geologic age. The derived qc/G0-CRR relationships were also found to be consistent with earthquake field-performance case histories.     

Correlation between Cyclic Resistance Ratios of Intact and Reconstituted Offshore Saturated Sands and Silts with the Same Shear Wave Velocity

The cyclic liquefaction resistance of intact medium dense specimens of sands and silts obtained from offshore platform sites was compared to that of specimens reconstituted to the same values of shear wave velocity. The shear wave velocity was measured using a new system that is comprised of torsional piezoelectric ceramic ring transducers mounted in a triaxial cell, a multiwave measuring device, and special watertight connectors. The relationship between cyclic resistance ratio and the number of cycles to liquefaction Nf of intact and reconstituted specimens was compared at the same values of consolidation pressure and shear wave velocity. There was good agreement between cyclic resistance ratios of intact and reconstituted specimens with similar values of shear wave velocity if liquefaction is defined as ? 6% peak-to-peak axial strain. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the cyclic liquefaction resistance of reconstituted specimens may be restored to in situ conditions when their shear wave velocity is restored to in situ values.     

Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils under Partially Drained Condition

In order to simulate the effect of drainage on soils adjacent to gravel drains that are installed as countermeasure against liquefaction, several series of cyclic triaxial tests were performed on saturated sands under partially drained conditions. The condition of partial drainage under cyclic loading was simulated in the laboratory using triaxial testing equipment installed with a drainage control valve to precisely regulate the volume of water being drained from test specimens. Effects of both drainage conditions and loading frequencies on cyclic response were incorporated through the coefficient of drainage effect, α*. Experimental results showed that for sand exhibiting strain softening, the partially drained response was controlled by the critical effective stress ratio while for sand showing strain hardening behavior, the controlling factor was the phase transformation stress ratio. Moreover, test results indicated that the minimum liquefaction resistance under partially drained conditions can be used as a parameter to describe the liquefaction resistance of sands improved by the gravel drain method. From these results, a simplified procedure for designing gravel drains based on the factor of safety (FL) concept was proposed.     

Updated Liquefaction Resistance Correction Factors for Aged Sands

Data from over 30 sites in 5 countries are analyzed to develop updated factors for correcting liquefaction resistance for aged sand deposits. Results of cyclic laboratory tests on relatively undisturbed and reconstituted specimens suggest an increase in the correction factors of 0.12 per log cycle of time and an average reference age of 2 days for the reconstitute specimens. Laboratory and field test results combined with cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) charts suggest an increase in the correction factors of 0.13 per log cycle of time and an average reference age of 23 years. A reference age of 23 years seems appropriate for the commonly used CRR charts derived from field liquefaction and no liquefaction case history data. Because age of natural deposits is often difficult to accurately determine, a relationship between measured to estimated shear-wave velocity ratio (MEVR) and liquefaction resistance correction factor is also derived directly from the compiled data. This new MEVR-liquefaction resistance correction factor relationship is not as sensitive to MEVR as in the relationship derived indirectly in a previous paper.     

In Situ Pore-Pressure Generation Behavior of Liquefiable Sand

To overcome current limitations in predicting in situ pore-pressure generation, a new field testing technique is used to measure directly the coupled, local response between the induced shear strains and the generated excess pore pressure. The pore-pressure generation characteristics from two in situ liquefaction tests performed on field reconstituted specimens are presented, including the pore- pressure generation patterns at various strain levels, the observed stages of pore-pressure generation, and pore-pressure generation curves. Comparisons of the in situ pore-pressure generation curves with data in the literature and from laboratory strain-controlled, cyclic direct simple shear tests support the in situ testing results. In addition, the effects of effective confining stress on threshold shear strain and pore- pressure generation curves are discussed. Comparisons of the rate of pore-pressure generation among the in situ tests, laboratory strain-controlled tests, and a model based on stress-controlled tests reveal that in situ pore pressures generated in reconstituted soil specimens during dynamic loading develop more similarly to those from cyclic strain-controlled laboratory testing. This observation implies that the evaluation of induced strains rather than induced shear stresses may be more appropriate for the simulation of pore-pressure generation.     

Subsurface Characterization at Ground Failure Sites in Adapazari, Turkey

Ground failure in Adapazari, Turkey during the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake was severe. Hundreds of structures settled, slid, tilted, and collapsed due in part to liquefaction and ground softening. Ground failure was more severe adjacent to and under buildings. The soils that led to severe building damage were generally low plasticity silts. In this paper, the results of a comprehensive investigation of the soils of Adapazari, which included cone penetration test (CPT) profiles followed by borings with standard penetration tests (SPTs) and soil index tests, are presented. The effects of subsurface conditions on the occurrence of ground failure and its resulting effect on building performance are explored through representative case histories. CPT- and SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures adequately identified soils that liquefied if the clay-size criterion of the Chinese criteria was disregarded. The CPT was able to identify thin seams of loose liquefiable silt, and the SPT (with retrieved samples) allowed for reliable evaluation of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. A well-documented database of in situ and index testing is now available for incorporating in future CPT- and SPT-based liquefaction triggering correlations.     

Evaluation of Cyclic Softening in Silts and Clays

Procedures are presented for evaluating the potential for cyclic softening (i.e., onset of significant strains or strength loss) in saturated silts and clays during earthquakes. The recommended procedures are applicable for fine-grained soils with sufficient plasticity that they would be characterized as behaving more fundamentally like clays in undrained monotonic or cyclic loading. The procedures are presented in a form that is similar to that used in semiempirical liquefaction procedures. Expressions are developed for a static shear stress correction factor and a magnitude scaling factor. Guidelines and empirical relations are presented for determining cyclic resistance ratios based on different approaches to characterizing fine-grained soil deposits. The potential consequences of cyclic softening, and the major variables affecting such consequences, are discussed. Application of these procedures is demonstrated through the analysis of the Carrefour Shopping Center case history from the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. The proposed procedures, in conjunction with associated liquefaction susceptibility criteria, provide an improved means for distinguishing between the conditions that do and those that do not lead to ground deformations in fine-grained soil deposits during earthquakes.     

Degree of Saturation and Liquefaction Resistances of Sand Improved with Sand Compaction Pile

Sand compaction pile (SCP) is a ground improvement technique extensively used to ameliorate liquefaction resistance of loose sand deposits. This paper discusses results of laboratory tests on high-quality undisturbed samples obtained by the in situ freezing method at six sites where foundation soils had been improved with SCP. Inspection of samples revealed that the improved ground was desaturated during the ground improvement. Degree of saturation (Sr) was lower than 77% for the sand piles and 91% for the improved sand layers, while Sr was approximately 100% for improved clayey and silty soils. A good correlation was found between Sr and 5% diameter of the soil; the larger 5% diameter of soils (D5), the lower the degree of saturation. It appeared that the variation of Sr with D5 for soils within a month after the ground improvement work was quite similar in trend to that after more than several years. Degree of saturation of soils after several years was noticeably, but not significantly, higher as compared with that shortly after ground improvement, indicating longevity of air bubbles injected in the improved soil. Undrained cyclic shear tests were also carried out on saturated and unsaturated specimens and effects of desaturation on undrained cyclic shear strength were studied. The test results were summarized in a form of liquefaction resistance with reference to normalized standard penetration test N-value.     

Assessment of the Axial Load Response of an H Pile Driven in Multilayered Soil

Most of the current design methods for driven piles were developed for closed-ended pipe piles driven in either pure clay or clean sand. These methods are sometimes used for H piles as well, even though the axial load response of H piles is different from that of pipe piles. Furthermore, in reality, soil profiles often consist of multiple layers of soils that may contain sand, clay, silt or a mixture of these three particle sizes. Therefore, accurate prediction of the ultimate bearing capacity of H piles driven in a mixed soil is very challenging. In addition, although results of well documented load tests on pipe piles are available, the literature contains limited information on the design of H piles. Most of the current design methods for driven piles do not provide specific recommendations for H piles. In order to evaluate the static load response of an H pile, fully instrumented axial load tests were performed on an H pile (HP?310×110) driven into a multilayered soil profile consisting of soils composed of various amounts of clay, silt and sand. The base of the H pile was embedded in a very dense nonplastic silt layer overlying a clay layer. This paper presents the results of the laboratory tests performed to characterize the soil profile and of the pile load tests. It also compares the measured pile resistances with those predicted with soil property- and in situ test-based methods.