Do "America's Best Hospitals" perform better for acute myocardial infarction?

BACKGROUND: "America's Best Hospitals," an influential list published annually by U.S. News and World Report, assesses the quality of hospitals. It is not known whether patients admitted to hospitals ranked at the top in cardiology have lower short-term mortality from acute myocardial infarction than those admitted to other hospitals or whether differences in mortality are explained by differential use of recommended therapies. METHODS: Using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project on 149,177 elderly Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995, we examined the care and outcomes of patients admitted to three types of hospitals: those ranked high in cardiology (top-ranked hospitals); hospitals not in the top rank that had on-site facilities for cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass surgery (similarly equipped hospitals); and the remaining hospitals (non-similarly equipped hospitals). We compared 30-day mortality; the rates of use of aspirin, beta-blockers, and reperfusion; and the relation of differences in rates of therapy to short-term mortality. RESULTS: Admission to a top-ranked hospital was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.87; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.00; P=0.05 for top-ranked hospitals vs. the others). Among patients without contraindications to therapy, top-ranked hospitals had significantly higher rates of use of aspirin (96.2 percent, as compared with 88.6 percent for similarly equipped hospitals and 83.4 percent for non-similarly equipped hospitals; P<0.01) and beta-blockers (75.0 percent vs. 61.8 percent and 58.7 percent, P<0.01), but lower rates of reperfusion therapy (61.0 percent vs. 70.7 percent and 65.6 percent, P=0.03). The survival advantage associated with admission to top-ranked hospitals was less strong after we adjusted for factors including the use of aspirin and beta-blockers (odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.08; P=0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Admission to a hospital ranked high on the list of "America's Best Hospitals" was associated with lower 30-day mortality among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. A substantial portion of the survival advantage may be associated with these hospitals' higher rates of use of aspirin and beta-blocker therapy.     

High level expression and structural characterisation of herpes simplex virus type I transcriptional activator VP16 (alpha-trans inducing factor)

BACKGROUND: Impaired platelet function has been reported in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke. However, prospective data on the changes of platelet status in patients before the occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke after thrombolytic therapy are unavailable. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 86-year-old male patient was among the 23 AMI patients enrolled in the platelet study for the GUSTO-III trial. He received 325 mg of aspirin daily for at least 6 years, suffered an AMI, and was successfully reperfused with alteplase, but after 44 hours developed a large hemorrhagic stroke resulting in paraplegia. Platelet aggregation and receptor expression were measured by flow cytometry and ELISA before thrombolysis and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours thereafter. The percentage of platelet aggregation was lower in the stroke patient at every time point when induced by 5 micromol/L of ADP, by 10 micromol/L of ADP, and by thrombin than in the rest of the AMI group. Ristocetin and collagen-induced aggregability were within the group range. Decreased platelet glycoprotein Ib, IIb, IIIa, and IIb/IIIa and vitronectin receptor expression were observed in the stroke patient. No other differences in p24 (CD9), very late antigen-2, P-selectin, and platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 expression were determined. CONCLUSIONS: Profound depression of platelet status preceded the occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke in an elderly long-term aspirin user treated with thrombolytic therapy. Initial "exhausted" platelets may be responsible for the increased risk for hemorrhagic stroke after coronary thrombolysis.     

Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock continues to be an ominous complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Evidence from retrospective analyses, registries and observational studies suggests that aggressive management using emergent revascularization strategies can bring about significant improvement in survival in this setting. Several studies have identified age as an independent predictor of survival. OBJECTIVE: To study retrospectively the possible changes in practice patterns in the management of patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in a tertiary care referral centre, and to determine what effect these changes may have had on survival of the patients, stratified by age. METHODS: From 1989 to 1995, 115 patients fulfilled the study criteria of cardiogenic shock based on pump failure and of presenting within 48 h of onset of shock. Prespecified data were extracted from medical records. All available coronary angiograms (n = 72) were analyzed by two experienced angiographers and consensus of findings was obtained. RESULTS: The study revealed a significant increase in the use of cardiac catheterization, interventional procedures and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support in patients in the age groups 65 years or less, 66 to 75 years, and older than 75 years in 1989 to 1990, through 1991 to 1992, to 1993 to 1995. Significantly fewer patients aged older than 75 years received cardiac catheterization, coronary intervention and IABP support throughout the study period and even in the final period analyzed. In-hospital survival improved from 4% in 1989-90 to 33% in 1991-92, and 44% in 1993-95 (P = 0.001). Patients aged 65 years or less improved from 10% in 1989-90 to 59% in 1993-95 (P = 0.032). Only 20% of patients aged older than 75 years survived in the 1993-95 period. By univariate analysis, use of coronary angiography (catheterization 46% versus no catheterization 5%; P < 0.0001), coronary intervention procedures (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting) (intervention 48% versus no intervention 9%; P < 0.0001) and IABP support (IABP 41% versus no IABP 18%; P = 0.0096) were all associated with improved in-hospital survival. Use of thrombolytic therapy showed possible survival benefit only in patients aged older than 75 years (thrombolysis 33% versus no thrombolysis 5%; P = 0.10). Patients who underwent coronary intervention were younger (P = 0.002), had a lower incidence of previous myocardial infarction (P = 0.0002), lower heart rate (P = 0.04), higher peak creatine phosphokinase (P = 0.04) and fewer vessels with at least 70% stenosis (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis only lower age, lower heart rate and presence of coronary intervention procedures were found to have an independent effect on survival. CONCLUSIONS: Use of invasive treatment strategies has increased significantly since 1989-90 in the management of patients with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock. This increase has been associated with improved in-hospital survival in all age groups except possibly the very elderly. Patients undergoing coronary interventional procedures are significantly different in baseline clinical characteristics from patients not undergoing these procedures. These observations underscore the need for randomized trials to define the optimal treatment strategies in these patients. Efficacy of invasive treatment strategies in elderly patients aged older than 75 years-deserves special attention.     

Therapy of acute myocardial infarct (1994-1996) at non-university hospitals in Switzerland (CHAMI Study)

The CHAMI study (Confederatio Helvetica Acute Myocardial Infarction) recorded the therapies administered for acute myocardial infarction in 520 consecutive patients between October 1994 and February 1996 at 10 non-academic hospitals in Switzerland. The patients in this group consisted of 363 men and 157 women with an average age of 63.2 years. The prescribed medications administered from the day of hospital admission until the day of discharge were recorded. In the acute phase, the patients were given the following therapy: thrombolytic agents 40%, i.v. nitrates 65%, i.v. beta-blockers 22%, aspirin 95%, oral beta-blockers 36%, ACE inhibitors 14%. Impressive was the lower distribution of thrombolytic agents and beta-blockers among the older patients (age > 70) (thrombolytic agents 52.1% vs 28.4%; oral beta-blockers 44.0% vs 29.1%) and in particular among women (thrombolytic agents 26.8% vs 46%; oral beta-blockers 29.3% vs 39.7%) in men. Therapy at hospital discharge consisted, inter alia, of aspirin (73%), beta-blockers (54%), ACE inhibitors (3%), and lipid lowering agents (10%). The hospital mortality was 12.6%. The CHAMI study provided the participating hospitals with a quality control comparison with other participating centers and impressively demonstrated with the example of the lipid lowering agents, that the significance of secondary prophylaxis is assigned too little importance in contrast to acute therapy.     

Aspirin versus coumadin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after successful thrombolysis: a prospective placebo-controlled angiographic study. Results of the APRICOT Study

BACKGROUND: Successful coronary thrombolysis involves a risk for reocclusion that cannot be prevented by invasive strategies. Therefore, we studied the effects of three antithrombotic regimens on the angiographic and clinical courses after successful thrombolysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy followed by intravenous heparin were eligible when a patent infarct-related artery was demonstrated at angiography < 48 hours. Three hundred patients were randomized to either 325 mg aspirin daily or placebo with discontinuation of heparin or to Coumadin with continuation of heparin until oral anticoagulation was established (international normalized ratio, 2.8-4.0). After 3 months, in which conservative treatment was intended, vessel patency and ventricular function were reassessed in 248 patients. Reocclusion rates were not significantly different: 25% (23 of 93) with aspirin, 30% (24 of 81) with Coumadin, and 32% (24 of 74) with placebo. Reinfarction was seen in 3% of patients on aspirin, in 8% on Coumadin, and in 11% on placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.025; other comparison, p = NS). Revascularization rate was 6% with aspirin, 13% with Coumadin, and 16% with placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.05; other comparisons, p = NS). Mortality was 2% and did not differ between groups. An event-free clinical course was seen in 93% with aspirin, in 82% with Coumadin, and in 76% with placebo (aspirin versus placebo, p < 0.001; aspirin versus Coumadin, p < 0.05). An event-free course without reocclusion was observed in 73% with aspirin, in 63% with Coumadin, and in 59% with placebo (p = NS). An increase of left ventricular ejection fraction was only found in the aspirin group (4.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 months after successful thrombolysis, reocclusion occurred in about 30% of patients, regardless of the use of antithrombotics. Compared with placebo, aspirin significantly reduces reinfarction rate and revascularization rate, improves event-free survival, and better preserves left ventricular function. The efficacy of Coumadin on these end points appears less than that of aspirin. The still-high reocclusion rate emphasizes the need for better antithrombotic therapy in these patients.     

Suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of d,l-sotalol with no antiarrhythmic drug treatment

CONTEXT: Antenatal corticosteroids for fetal maturation have been underused, despite evidence for their benefits in cases of preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dissemination strategies aimed at increasing appropriate use of this therapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Twenty-seven tertiary care institutions were randomly assigned to either usual dissemination of practice recommendations (n = 14) or usual dissemination plus an active, focused dissemination effort (n = 13). SUBJECTS: Obstetricians and their preterm delivery cases at participating hospitals. INTERVENTION: Recommendations by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference held in late February-early March 1994 were disseminated in early May 1994. Usual dissemination was publication of the recommendations and endorsement by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Active dissemination was a year-long educational effort led by an influential physician and a nurse coordinator at each facility, consisting of grand rounds, a chart reminder system, group discussion of case scenarios, monitoring, and feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Use or nonuse of antenatal corticosteroids was abstracted from medical records of eligible women delivering at the participating hospitals in the 12 months immediately prior to release of the NIH recommendations (average number of records abstracted, 130) and in the 12 months following their release (average number of records abstracted, 122). RESULTS: Active dissemination significantly increased the odds of corticosteroid use after the conference. Use increased from 33.0% of eligible patients receiving corticosteroids to 57.6%, or by 75% over baseline, in usual dissemination hospitals. Use increased from 32.9% to 68.3%, oran 108% increase, in active dissemination hospitals. Gestational age and maternal diagnosis affected use of the therapy in complex ways. CONCLUSION: An active, focused dissemination effort increased the effectiveness of usual dissemination methods when combined with key principles to change physician practices.     

Pharmacologic profile of survivors of acute myocardial infarction at United States academic hospitals

Optimal drug therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well described in the medical literature. However, data on the actual pharmacologic management of patients surviving AMI at academic hospitals is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to document treatment profiles in 500 patients surviving AMI at 12 academic hospitals in the United States. These profiles were compared with established guidelines and were evaluated for trends. Overall, thrombolytics (streptokinase > or = tissue-type plasminogen activator) were administered in 29% of the patients, with a greater proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers than calcium channel antagonists in the initial 72 hours (61% vs 40%; p < 0.005) and at discharge (51% vs 35%; p < 0.005). Further, women were less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.69) or beta-blocker therapy within the first 72 hours (OR = 0.61; CI, 0.55 to 0.67) or at hospital discharge (OR = 0.53; CI, 0.48 to 0.58). Overall, improvements could still be made in the number of patients who receive thrombolytic and acute and chronic beta-blocker therapies after AMI, particularly in women. Changes in treatment profiles may be a reflection of the publication of large clinical trials.     

Improvement in long-term prognosis of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction after the introduction of intravenous thrombolytic therapy

Survival rate from a "thrombolytic" period of 351 patients above 66 years of age with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was compared with that of 289 patients from a "prethrombolytic" period. The two groups were comparable regarding sex, age, previous AMI, cerebrovascular events, morbidity and mortality during admission. Survival rates after four years were 45.0% in the "thrombolytic" group and 38.4% in the "prethrombolytic" group (p = 0.047, log rank test). Using the Cox proportional hazard analysis, thrombolytic therapy was shown to be an independent prognostic predictor in "the thrombolytic population" with a relative risk of death from day 30 to end of follow-up of 0.4 (95% confidence interval 0.2-0.8). No interaction was found between age and thrombolysis. Although only one-fifth of the patients with AMI were eligible for thrombolysis, this treatment may have contributed to the improved long-term survival.     

Adjuvant therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarct

Besides the thrombolytic therapy several adjuvant therapeutic measures were identified which significantly improve the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These measures include the treatment by means of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors. Early administration of ASA and beta-blockers are indicated in all patients with AMI who have no contraindications for this therapy. They are especially the patients with manifest heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction who benefit from ACE inhibitors. The effectivity of routine administration of other medicaments such as anticoagulants, nitrates, calcium channel blockers and magnesium, have not been convincingly proved. However, some selected patients with AMI can benefit from these medicaments. Intravenous administration of heparin is unambiguously justified only in thrombolysis with t-PA. Thrombolyses with streptokinase, urokinase, and anistreplase are justified only at high risk of thromboembolic complications. Their prevention and therapy include also the necessity to restrict the administration of pelentan. The use of nitrates is indicated in patients with AMI in case of sustaining stenocardia, arterial hypertension and manifest heart left ventricular failure. Until the definitive standpoint is gained regarding the effect of magnesium in patients with AIM, its administration remains especially indicated in cases of arterial hypertension, tachycardiac disturbances of the heart rhythm and states of assumed or proved hypomagnesiemia. In AMI cases when magnesium is used in order to protect the patient from reperfusion lesion, it must be administered prior to the reperfusion therapy. An intensive research in the field of therapeutical measures in patients with AMI still continues. It is certain that it will soon bring further knowledge which will in turn improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with AMI. (Tab. 4, Ref. 133.)     

Analysis of coronary ultrasound thrombolysis endpoints in acute myocardial infarction (ACUTE trial). Results of the feasibility phase

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that therapeutic ultrasound effects ultrasound thrombolysis by selectively disrupting the fibrin matrix of the thrombus. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical feasibility of percutaneous transluminal coronary ultrasound thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 15) with evidence of anterior AMI and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 0 or 1 flow in the left anterior descending artery underwent coronary ultrasound thrombolysis. Angiographic follow-up was performed after 10 minutes and 12 to 24 hours. Ultrasound induced successful reperfusion (TIMI grade 3 flow) in 87% of the patients. Adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) after ultrasound thrombolysis produced a final residual stenosis of 20 +/- 12% as determined by quantitative coronary angiographic analysis. There were no adverse angiographic signs or clinical effects during the procedure. There was no change in the degree of flow in any of the patients at the 12- to 24-hour angiograms. During hospitalization, 1 patient had recurrent ischemia on the fifth day after the procedure, and emergent catheterization revealed occlusion at the treatment site. The patient was successfully treated with PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ultrasound thrombolysis has the potential to be a safe and effective catheter-based therapeutic modality in reperfusion therapy for patients with AMI and other clinical conditions associated with intracoronary thrombosis.     

A prospective randomized trial of triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Results of the medicine versus angiography in thrombolytic exclusion (MATE) trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if early triage angiography with revascularization, if indicated, favorably affects clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction who are ineligible for thrombolysis. BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction and other acute coronary syndromes are considered ineligible for thrombolysis and therefore are not afforded the opportunity for early reperfusion. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluated in a controlled fashion the outcomes following triage angiography in acute coronary syndromes ineligible for thrombolytic therapy. Eligible patients (n=201) with <24 h of symptoms were randomized to early triage angiography and subsequent therapies based on the angiogram versus conventional medical therapy consisting of aspirin, intravenous heparin, nitroglycerin, beta-blockers, and analgesics. RESULTS: In the triage angiography group, 109 patients underwent early angiography and 64 (58%) received revascularization, whereas in the conservative group, 54 (60%) subsequently underwent nonprotocol angiography in response to recurrent ischemia and 33 (37%) received revascularization (p=0.004). The mean time to revascularization was 27+/-32 versus 88+/-98 h (p=0.0001) and the primary endpoint of recurrent ischemic events or death occurred in 14 (13%) versus 31 (34%) of the triage angiography and conservative groups, respectively (45% risk reduction, 95% CI 27-59%, p=0.0002). There were no differences between the groups with respect to initial hospital costs or length of stay. Long-term follow-up at a median of 21 months revealed no significant differences in the endpoints of late revascularization, recurrent myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early triage angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not eligible for thrombolytics reduced the composite of recurrent ischemic events or death and shortened the time to definitive revascularization during the index hospitalization. Despite more frequent early revascularization after triage angiography, we found no long-term benefit in cardiac outcomes compared with conservative medical therapy with revascularization prompted by recurrent ischemia.     

Falling hospital mortality for acute myocardial infarction in Quebec hospitals

OBJECTIVE: To present in-hospital mortality trends for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Observational study using the Quebec administrative hospital database, which records all hospitalizations for AMI, for the period 1986 to 1996. RESULTS: From 1986 to 1996, the case fatality rate for AMI decreased from 18.4% to 12.7% despite an increase in the total number of admissions, due to an ageing population. Men and women have had similar yearly mortality reductions--7.6% versus 7.4%, respectively--although the absolute case fatality rate remains significantly higher for women. The mortality reduction for men was constant over the decade, while the decline for women was more pronounced over the last five years. Improving case fatality rates were also observed in the elderly and again were most evident from 1991 to 1996. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a sharp decline in case fatality rates for AMI patients treated in Quebec hospitals from 1986 to 1996, suggesting that treatment advances observed in clinical trials are being applied at a population level. While improved survival has been observed in all patient groups, the data suggest that the part of the decline in mortality may be due to increased penetration of proven treatment strategies in women and the elderly.     

Analysis of the treatment of spontaneous sustained stable ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: To determine the termination rate of spontaneous sustained stable ventricular tachycardia (SSSVT) as a function of the first and second therapeutic interventions used, and to determine factors associated with successful termination. METHODS: A multihospital, retrospective analysis of the treatment of patients with SSSVT was performed. The setting included 2 urban county hospitals, 2 urban private hospitals, and a Veterans Affairs hospital. Cases were identified by discharge diagnosis and ECG characteristics, and confirmed by electrophysiology study or ECG criteria. RESULTS: There were 40 cases of SSSVT identified. Excluding adenosine, 35 patients were treated with lidocaine as a first intervention. The rate of termination with lidocaine bolus was 17% (6 of 35) (95% CI 7-34%). Regarding the 35 patients initially treated with lidocaine, the odds of termination of SSSVT were 11 times greater in those without a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI) than in those with a history of MI (95% CI 0.96-551). Of the 29 patients who failed initial lidocaine treatment, 23 were treated with a second lidocaine bolus, with a termination rate of 18% (4 of 22) (95% CI 5-40%). Only 2 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia had a concurrent MI, and the tachycardia was unresponsive to initial lidocaine bolus in both cases. Fifteen patients received adenosine with no tachycardia terminations and no significant adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of SSSVT termination with lidocaine was low, particularly in patients with a history of Mi.     

Prehospital management of acute myocardial infarction: Electrocardiogram acquisition and interpretation, and thrombolysis by prehospital care providers

OBJECTIVE: To review prehospital management of patients with suspected ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on the acquisition and interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs), and the effects of thrombolytic therapy initiated by prehospital care providers. DESIGN: MEDLINE was searched by combining the search phrases 'thrombolysis,' 'paramedics' and 'myocardial infarction' to identify all pertinent articles. The bibliographies were reviewed to search for other relevant articles. RESULTS: The earlier that treatment is initiated in AMI, the better the prognosis. Multiple randomized and nonrandomized trials indicate that prehospital care providers (including paramedics, nurses and doctors) are able to acquire prehospital ECGs with negligible increases in on-scene time, ranging from 30 s to 7 mins. With minimal training, they are capable of accurately interpreting ECGs and diagnosing ST elevation AMI, with results comparable with control ECGs obtained by physicians. Numerous studies have investigated the role of specially trained prehospital personnel in initiating thrombolysis. Trials outside of North America have predominantly used physicians, whereas North American studies employed paramedics. Thrombolysis has been shown to be safe and effective when started outside the hospital by physicians or paramedics, with a reduction in time to treatment and no increase in complications. The further a patient with ST elevation AMI is from hospital, the greater the potential benefit of prehospital thrombolysis. The European Myocardial Infarction Project (EMIP), the largest randomized trial of prehospital thrombolysis, demonstrated a trend towards reduced mortality but was underpowered to detect significant mortality differences. The Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT), a rural study, is the only randomized trial to demonstrate a statistically significant mortality difference in patients receiving prehospital thrombolysis. Despite trends in favour of prehospital diagnosis and treatment of AMI, no urban study has been sufficiently powered to demonstrate mortality benefits. CONCLUSION: Prehospital treatment of patients with chest pain using ECGs and thrombolysis is safe. Though rural patients have significant reductions in total mortality when treated with thrombolysis in a prehospital setting, this has not been documented with an urban population. Prehospital identification of thrombolysis-eligible patients with ST elevation AMI via acquisition and interpretation of ECGs followed by triage to a hospital 'lytic team' has the potential to improve patient outcome and requires further investigation. A prehospital paramedic program for identifying and treating thrombolysis-eligible patients requires intensive planning, retrospective feasibility work, implementation and monitoring to establish effectiveness.     

Balloon dilatation in acute myocardial infarct in routine clinical practice: results of the register of the Working Society of Leading Cardiologic Hospital Physicians in 4,625 patients

Balloon angioplasty as the treatment of first choice in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is gaining widespread acceptance because of favourable results from specialised centres concerning high patency rates and low mortality. This study reports the results of angioplasty for AMI at large community hospitals during 1992-1995. 4625 procedures were performed at 68 centres of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhaus?rzte (ALKK). The age of the patients was 60.8 +/- 11.3 years, with 75.1% men. The infarct related artery was the left anterior descendent in 43%, the right coronary artery in 37%, the circumflex artery in 16%, a bypass graft in 2.3% and the left main stem in 1.4% of patients. The success rate (residual stenosis < 50%) of the intervention was 86%. There was a wide range of procedures per centre, with a median of 40 AMI angioplasties per year and centre. The amount of angioplasties for AMI in relation to all angioplasties performed during this period rose from 5.2% in 1992 to 5.9% in 1995 (p = 0.01). Local complications at the puncture site occurred in 3.2%, with the need for a surgical intervention in 1.1% of patients. In 273 (5.9%) of the patients a second angioplasty was performed during the hospital stay. Aortocoronary bypass surgery was performed in 3% of the patients. Hospital mortality was 9.5% (438/4625 patients). The mortality rate remained constant during the years investigated (1992: 10.6%; 1993: 8.6%; 1994: 9.7%; 1995: 9.8%; p = ns). Higher mortality was observed in older patients, patients with multiple vessel disease, the left anterior descending artery or a bypass graft as infarct related artery as well as in patients with failed reperfusion (residual stenoses > 50%). Hospitals with a case load of more than 40 angioplasties for AMI per year showed a lower mortality as compared to the others. In clinical practice at large community hospitals results of angioplasty for AMI concerning mortality, complications and technical success rate are comparable to those of highly specialised centres. The absolute numbers of angioplasties for AMI increased constantly over the years.     

Improvement in the treatment of acute myocardial infarct by the establishment of a thrombolysis unit in a cardiology servic

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lack of available beds in the coronary care unit, makes time to thrombolysis still too long. Although fibrinolytic therapy is administered in the emergency department in most hospitals, mean in-hospital delay continues to be long. Our purpose was to improve the treatment of these patients and to evaluate if this delay could be shortened by creating a thrombolysis unit for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: A thrombolysis unit in the cardiology department was set up to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction who couldn't be admitted directly in the coronary care unit because of lack of available beds. Time to treatment in both groups of patients were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation were included: 86 (38%) of them were admitted to the thrombolysis unit and the other 139 (62%) to the coronary care unit. There were no differences in baseline characteristics or in the pre-hospital delay between both groups. Time from hospital admission to thrombolysis was 59 minutes in patients treated in the thrombolysis unit versus 70 minutes in those treated in the coronary care unit (p < 0.001), and time from the admission to both units to fibrinolytic therapy was of 20 minutes versus 30 minutes respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between both groups in the incidence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital delay in thrombolysis remains too long. Implementation of a thrombolysis unit in the cardiology department shortens this delay and offers the possibility to treat patients with acute myocardial infarction at least as well as in the coronary care unit, without dependence on the availability of free beds in this unit.     

The cat vertebral column: stance configuration and range of motion

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether clinical-teaching skills could be improved by providing teachers with augmented student feedback. METHOD: A randomized, controlled trial in 1994 included 42 attending physicians and 39 residents from the Department of Medicine at the Indiana University School of Medicine who taught 110 students on medicine ward rotations for one-month periods. Before teaching rotations, intervention group teachers received norm-referenced, graphic summaries of their teaching performances as rated by students. At mid-month, intervention group teachers received students' ratings augmented by individualized teaching-effectiveness guidelines based on the Stanford Faculty Development Program framework. Linear models were used to analyze the students' mean ratings of teaching behaviors at mid-month and end-of-month. Independent variables included performance ratings, intervention status, teacher status, teaching experience, and interactions with baseline ratings. RESULTS: Complex interactions with baseline performance were found for most teaching categories at mid-month and end-of-month. The intervention-group teachers who had high baseline performance scores had higher student ratings than did the control group teachers with similar baseline scores; the intervention group teachers who had low baseline performance scores were rated lower than were the control group teachers with comparable baseline scores. The residents who had medium or high baseline scores were rated higher than were the attending physicians with comparable baseline scores; the performance of the residents who had low baseline scores was similar to that of the attending physicians with comparable baseline scores. CONCLUSION: Baseline performance is important for targeting those teachers most likely to benefit from augmented student feedback. Potential deterioration in teaching performance warrants a reconsideration of distributing students' ratings to teachers with low baseline performance scores.