Molecular simulation of miscibility of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blend with the compatibilizer triblock terpolymer SBM

Polymer blend of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene ether) (PPE) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN), which has broad commercial interest, has limited miscibility. A triblock terpolymer, polystyrene‐block‐polybutadiene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) (SBM), is often used as compatibilizer to improve the miscibility of PPE/SAN. In this work, dissipative particle dynamics and molecular dynamics of Material Studio were used to study the essentials that influence miscibility of the blend systems, and then Flory–Huggins parameter χ, radial distribution function (RDF) and morphologies are analyzed. It shows that the blends with more content of styrene in SAN (above 90 wt%), whose mass percentage is 60%, are best miscible. For the systems of PPE/SAN added with SBM, the miscibility increases and then decreases with the increase of SBM content. A longer chain of styrene (S) in SBM leads to wrapped structure of PMMA by PB, wrapped by PS, resulting in decrease of the miscibility. From studies and simulation of χ and RDF, the best blend system for commercial and industrial use is the one with mass ratio of PPE/SAN/SBM 36/54/10, in which S content in SAN is above 90 wt%. For SBM, the ratio of chain length styrene (S)/butadiene (B) is lessthan 1, while B and M are the same in chain length. POLYM. COMPOS., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Enzymatic degradation of blends of poly(ε‐caprolactone) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) by Pseudomonas lipase

In polymer blends, the composition and microcrystalline structure of the blend near surfaces can be markedly different from the bulk properties. In this study, the enzymatic degradation of poly(ε‐caprolactone) (PCL) and its blends with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) was conducted in a phosphate buffer solution containing Pseudomonas lipase, and the degradation behavior was correlated with the surface properties and crystalline microstructure of the blends. The enzymatic degradation preferentially took place at the amorphous part of PCL film. The melt‐quenched PCL film with low crystallinity and small lamellar thickness showed a higher degradation rate compared with isothermally crystallized (at 36, 40, and 44°C) PCL films. Also, there was a vast difference in the enzymatic degradation behavior of pure PCL and PCL/SAN blends. The pure PCL showed 100% weight loss in a very short time (i.e., 72 h), whereas the PCL/SAN blend containing just 1% SAN showed ～50% weight loss and the degradation ceased, and the blend containing 40% SAN showed almost no weight loss. These results suggest that as degradation proceeds, the nondegradable SAN content increases at the surface of PCL/SAN films and prevents the lipase from attacking the biodegradable PCL chains. This phenomenon was observed even for a very high PCL content in the blend samples. In the blend with low PCL content, the inaccessibility of the amorphous interphase with high SAN content prevented the attack of lipase on the lamellae of PCL. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 868–879, 2002     

A comparative study of poly(l‐lactide)‐block‐poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) six‐armed star diblock copolymers and polylactide/poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) blends

This paper deals with the synthesis of a series of six‐armed star diblock copolymers based on poly(l ‐lactide) (PLLA) and poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) by ring‐opening polymerization using stannous octoate as catalyst and the preparation of polylactide (PLA)/PCL linear blends using a solution blending technique, while keeping the PLA‐to‐PCL ratio comparable in both systems. The thermal, rheological and mechanical properties of the copolymers and the blends were comparatively studied. The melting point and the degree of crystallinity were found to be lower for the copolymers than the blends due to poor folding property of star copolymers. Dynamic rheology revealed that the star polymers have lower elastic modulus, storage modulus and viscosity as compared to the corresponding blends with similar composition. The blends show two‐phase dispersed morphology whereas the copolymers exhibited microphase separated morphology with elongated (worm‐like) microdomains. The crystalline structures of the copolymers were characterized by larger crystallites than their blend counterparts, as estimated using Sherrer's equation based on wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction data. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry     

Rheology and extrusion foaming of chain‐branched poly(lactic acid)

In this study, the effect of macromolecular chain‐branching on poly(lactic acid) (PLA) rheology, crystallization, and extrusion foaming was investigated. Two PLA grades, an amorphous and a semi‐crystalline one, were branched using a multifunctional styrene‐acrylic‐epoxy copolymer. The branching of PLA and its foaming were achieved in one‐step extrusion process. Carbon dioxide (CO₂), in concentration up to 9%, was used as expansion agent to obtain foams from the two PLA branched using chain‐extender contents up to 2%. The foams were investigated with respect to their shear and elongational behavior, crystallinity, morphology, and density. The addition of the chain‐extender led to an increase in complex viscosity, elasticity, elongational viscosity, and in the manifestation of the strain‐hardening phenomena. Low‐density foams were obtained at 5–9% CO₂ for semi‐crystalline PLA and only at 9% CO₂ in the case of the amorphous PLA. Differences in foaming behavior were attributed to crystallites formation during the foaming process. The rheological and structural changes associated with PLA chain‐extension lowered the achieved crystallinity but slightly improved the foamability at low CO₂ content. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Melting point depression in poly(ɛ-caprolactone) / poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) blends

Summary The melting point depression of poly(-caprolactone)/poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (PCL/SAN) blends with changes in acrylonitrile content of SAN and in blend ratio was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. For the melting points at a constant blend ratio occur a minimum in dependence on the copolymer composition for blends containing about 20 wt% acrylonitrile in SAN. From melting point depression data a negative, binary interaction parameter was obtained for PCL/SAN blends containing a SAN with 19.2 wt% AN. By optical microscopy it can be shown that the shape of the spherulites changes with copolymer composition of SAN and blend ratio.     

Gloss reduction and morphological properties of polycarbonate and poly(methyl methacrylate‐acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends with SAN‐co‐GMA as a reactive compatibilizer

The gloss properties of the polycarbonate (PC)/poly(methyl methacrylate‐acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (MABS) blend with styrene‐acrylonitrile‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (SAN‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizing agent were investigated. For the PC/poly(MABS)/SAN‐co‐GMA (65/15/20, wt %) blend surface, the reduction of gloss level was observed most significantly when the GMA content was 0.1 wt %, compared with the blends with 0.05 wt % GMA or without GMA content. The gloss level of the PC/poly(MABS)/SAN‐co‐GMA (0.1 wt % GMA) blend surface was observed to be 35, which showed 65% lower than the PC/poly(MABS)/SAN‐co‐GMA blend without GMA content. The gloss reduction was most probably caused by the insoluble fractions of the PC/poly(MABS)/SAN‐co‐GMA blend that were formed by the reaction between the carboxylic acid group in poly(MABS) and epoxy group in SAN‐co‐GMA. The results of optical and transmission electron microscope analysis, spectroscopy study, and rheological properties supported the formation of insoluble structure of the PC/poly(MABS)/SAN‐co‐GMA blend when the GMA content was 0.1 wt %. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46450.     

Influence of composition and phase morphology on rheological properties of polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐octene) blends

In this article, the phase morphology and rheological properties of polypropylene (PP)/poly(ethylene‐co‐octene) (POE) blends with a droplet‐matrix microstructure were studied by scanning electron microscopy and rheological experiments. The data were analyzed to yield the variations of rheological behavior with blend composition and insight into the microstructure of PP/POE blends. The Palierne's emulsion type model was used to extract information on rheological properties, and the interfacial tensions between the PP and POE were determined by fitting the experimental data with this model. The results indicated that the interfacial tensions were shown to depend on blend composition and temperature. Rheological properties of PP/POE blends were investigated in a systemic way with varying shear histories. The results showed that shear history had an important effect on the rheological properties of the blends due to the dispersed phase (POE) domains refined with increasing preshear rate and preshear time. POLYM. COMPOS., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibilization and elastomer toughening of polyamide‐6 (PA6)/poly(phenylene ether) (PPE) blends

In the elastomer‐modified (polyamide‐6/poly(phenylene ether) (PA6/PPE) = 50/50 blends, poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA) was demonstrated to be an efficient reactive compatibilizer. The G1651 elastomer was shown to be an effective impact modifier to result in superior toughness and heat‐deflection temperature (HDT) than is the 1901X elastomer for the SMA‐compatibilized blends because G1651 particles exclusively reside within the dispersed PPE phase but 1901X particles tend to distribute in the PA6 matrix and/or along the interface. The apparent average diameter of the dispersed PPE phase is insignificantly dependent on the elastomer content in the G1651‐modified blend, whereas it increases with increase of the elastomer content in the 1901X‐modified blend. Moreover, there exists a critical elastomer content, 15 phr, for the ductile–brittle transition of the G1651‐modified SMA‐modified PA6/PPE blends. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 23–32, 1999     

Thermoplastic elastomeric blend of nitrile rubber and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile). I. Effect of mixing sequence and dynamic vulcanization on mechanical properties

The effects of dynamic vulcanization and blend ratios on mechanical properties and morphology of thermoplastic elastomeric (TPE) compositions, based on blends of nitrile rubber (NBR) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN), were studied. The TPE composition prepared by adding a rubber‐curatives masterbatch to softened SAN yields higher mechanical properties than that prepared by adding curatives to the softened plastic–rubber preblend. The blends having a higher rubber–plastic ratio (60 : 40 to 80 : 20) display thermoplastic elastomeric behavior, whereas those having a higher plastic–rubber ratio (50 : 50 to 90 : 10) display the behavior of impact‐resistant plastics. DSC studies revealed that NBR and SAN are thermodynamically immiscible. SEM studies of the thermoplastic elastomeric compositions show that SAN forms the matrix in which fine particles of NBR form the dispersed phase. It was further confirmed by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis. Dynamic vulcanization causes a decrease in the size of dispersed particles and improvement in mechanical properties. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 88: 1976–1987, 2003     

Effects of compatibilizer on the morphological,mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(N‐methyl methacrylimide) blends

The effects of compatibilizer on the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(N‐methyl methacrylimide) (PMMI) (70/30) blends were investigated. The compatibilizer used in this study was styrene–acrylonitrile–glycidyl methacrylate (SAN‐GMA) copolymer. Morphological characterization of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend with SAN‐GMA showed a decrease in PMMI droplet size with an increase in SAN‐GMA. The glass‐transition temperature of the PMMA‐rich phase became higher when SAN‐GMA was added up to 5 parts per hundred resin by weight (phr). The flexural and tensile strengths of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend increased with the addition of SAN‐GMA up to 5 phr. The complex viscosity of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blends increased when SAN‐GMA was added up to 5 phr, which implies an increase in compatibility between the PMMA and PMMI components. From the weighted relaxation spectrum, which was obtained from the storage modulus and loss modulus, the interfacial tension of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blend was calculated using the Palierne emulsion model and the Choi‐Schowalter model. The results of the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and rheological studies and the values of the interfacial tension of the PMMA/PMMI (70/30) blends suggest that the optimum compatibilizer concentration of SAN‐GMA is 5 phr. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43856.     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) and polystyrene blends with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide)

In this work, the compatibilization of blends of plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene (PS) with poly(styrene‐co‐n‐methylolacrylamide) (PSnMA) was investigated. The PSnMA was synthesized by emulsion polymerization with different amounts of n‐methylolacrylamide (nMA). Particle size and phase behavior was determined by scanning electron microscopy, and mechanical properties were determined in an Universal Testing Machine. Micrographs revealed that an appreciable size reduction of the dispersed phase was achieved when small amounts of PSnMA were added to the blend, and as the amount of nMA was increased, particle size decreased. When the (PVC/PS/PSnMA) blend was subjected to solvent extraction to remove PS and unreacted PVC, the residue showed a single T_g. Tensile modulus and the ultimate strength of the blends increased with PSnMA content. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Preparation and characterization of compatible thermoplastic dry starch/poly(lactic acid)

In the presence of glycerol and formamide, one‐step extrusion processing was used to prepare poly(lactic acid) (PLA)/thermoplastic dry starch (DTPS) blends (50/50 wt%) in a single‐screw extruder. The rheological study proved that formamide could improve the fluidity of DTPS and DTPS/PLA blends. With increasing the fluidity of DTPS, a highly dispersed and compatible DTPS/PLA could be achieved by scanning electron microscope (SEM). It was also certain that the plasticization of DTPS was improved. At the same time, Fourier transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy proved that formamide not only weakened the interaction of starch molecules, but also improved the interaction between DTPS and PLA. So that the blend could achieve more thermal stability in a compatible blend, as shown in TGA. The improvement of compatible in DTPS/PLA blends was also proved by tensile test and Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) in this article. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effect of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) imidization on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The objective of this work was to study the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA)/poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME) and SMA/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends with differential scanning calorimetry and small‐angle light scattering techniques. We focused on the effect of SMA partial imidization with aniline on the miscibility and phase‐separation temperatures of these blends. The SMA imidization reaction led to a partially imidized styrene N‐phenyl succinimide copolymer (SMI) with a degree of conversion of 49% and a decomposition temperature higher than that of SMA by about 20°C. We observed that both SMI/PVME and SMI/PMMA blends had lower critical solution temperature behavior. The imidization of SMA increased the phase‐separation temperature of the SMA/PVME blend and decreased that of the SMA/PMMA blend. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Melt rheology of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Dynamic viscoelastic properties for miscible blends of poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) were measured. It was found that the time–temperature superposition principle is applicable over the entire temperature range studied for the blends. The temperature dependency of the shift factors a_T can be expressed by the Williams–Landel–Ferry equation: log a_T = ?8.86(T ? T_s)/(101.6 + T ? T_s). The compositional dependency of T_s represents the Gordon–Taylor equation. The zero‐shear viscosities are found to increase concavely upward with an increase in weight fraction of SAN at constant temperature, but concavely downward at constant free volume fraction. It is concluded that the relaxation behavior of the PCL/SAN blends is similar to that of a blend consisting of homologous polymers. It is emphasized that the viscoelastic functions of the miscible blends should be compared in the iso‐free volume state. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 2037–2041, 2001     

Development of phase morphology in immiscible poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/poly(butylene terephthalate) nanoblends: Mechanical properties and effect of the compatibilizer

Nanoblends were obtained from poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) as a matrix, and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) was used as a nanodispersed phase. Compatibilized SAN/PBT blends were prepared by reactive extrusion, and the PBT concentrations ranged between 3 and 30 wt %. Nanoblends were obtained for up to 10 wt % PBT concentrations in the presence of the compatibilizer. With 20 and 30 wt % PBT, the extruded material presented a droplet dispersed phase. The same blends were subjected to an injection‐molding process, which provided a cocontinuous phase morphology. The influence of the concentration of the dispersed phase and the type of morphology on the mechanical behavior of tensile test, flexural test, impact test, and deflection temperature of the blends was analyzed. The results show an important reduction in the particle size of the dispersed phase, which was due to the presence of the compatibilizer. Furthermore, the type of morphology and an excess of compatibilizer exerted a stronger influence on the mechanical properties than the particle size of the dispersed phase. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45030.     

Effect of the addition of acrylonitrile/ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM)/styrene graft copolymer on the morphology–properties relationships in poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile)/EPDM rubber blends

Blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acylonitrile) (SAN) with ethylene–propylene–diene monomer (EPDM) rubber were investigated. An improved toughness–stiffness balance of the SAN/EPDM blend was obtained when an appropriate amount of acrylonitrile–EPDM–styrene (AES) graft copolymer was added, prepared by grafting EPDM with styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer, and mixed thoroughly with both of the two components of the blend. Morphological observations indicated a finer dispersion of the EPDM particles in the SAN/EPDM/AES blends, and particle size distribution became narrower with increasing amounts of AES. Meanwhile, it was found that the SAN/EPDM blend having a ratio of 82.5/17.5 by weight was more effective in increasing the impact strength than that of the 90/10 blend. From dynamic mechanic analysis of the blends, the glass‐transition temperature of the EPDM‐rich phase increased from ?53.9 to ?46.2°C, even ?32.0°C, for the ratio of 82.5/17.5 blend of SAN/EPDM, whereas that of the SAN‐rich phase decreased from 109.2 to 108.6 and 107.5°C with the additions of 6 and 10% AES copolymer contents, respectively. It was confirmed that AES graft copolymer is an efficient compatibilizer for SAN/EPDM blend. The compatibilizer plays an important role in connecting two phases and improving the stress transfer in the blends. Certain morphological features such as thin filament connecting and even networking of the dispersed rubber phase may contribute to the overall ductility of the high impact strength of the studied blends. Moreover, its potential to induce a brittle–ductile transition of the glassy SAN matrix is considered to explain the toughening mechanism. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1685–1697, 2004     

Effect of blend composition and organoclay loading on the nanocomposite structure and properties of miscible poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Organically‐modified montmorillonite clay nanocomposites of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and SAN/PMMA miscible blend are investigated. Structure characteristics at the nanoscale and microscale and thermal and tensile properties are studied as a function of polymer blend composition and filler loading fraction. Blend miscibility and T_g are unaffected by up to 10% by wt. organoclay. Thermal degradation stability increases with SAN content and exhibits an optimum value of clay loading. Stiffness shows significant improvement. Tensile strength and elongation‐at‐break suffer as a result of nanocomposite formation. Modulus shows a maximum enhancement of 57% (5 ± 0.06 GPa at 10 wt% filler, 20/80 SAN/PMMA) and varies linearly with clay fraction for all compositions of matrix phase. Predictions of Halpin–Tsai composite model are in excellent agreement with the experimental behavior over full range of polymer blend composition. Fundamental aspects of a polymer blend–clay nanocomposite are clarified, such as lack of additional synergy between clay platelets and matrix, and tensile ductility reduction, compared with polymer–clay system. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers