Pathological staging and biochemical recurrence after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy in combination with radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: results of a phase II study

OBJECTIVES: To assess the pathological staging and biochemical progression-free survival (assessed using serum prostate-specific antigen level) of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in combination with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out on 69 patients with localized prostate cancer who were enrolled in a trial of 3 months of ADT followed by RRP (group 1). These patients were compared with 72 patients matched for age and clinical stage who declined ADT therapy and had RRP concurrently (group 2). Assignment to the individual treatment groups was thus determined by the patient's preference and not the physician's selection. Pathological staging and biochemical progression-free recurrence were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The rate of organ-confined (pT2) tumours was 74% in group 1 and 49% in group 2 (P < 0.01), and the rate of margin-negative tumours was 87% in group 1 and 64% in group 2 (P < 0.01). Within a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no significant difference in biochemical failure between the groups (P = 0.37). Patients with pT2 disease, regardless of treatment, had similar biochemical failure rates. In the patients with margin-positive disease, there was a significantly higher biochemical failure rate in group 1 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of organ- and specimen-confined disease were higher among the patients treated with ADT. The preliminary follow-up suggested that patients with pT2 disease after ADT have a biochemical progression-free recurrence rate similar to pT2 patients treated with RRP alone. Additionally, high biochemical failure rates in patients with margin-positive disease after ADT may identify a subset of more biologically aggressive tumours in need of early adjuvant treatment.     

Induction androgen deprivation plus prostatectomy for stage T3 disease: failure to achieve prostate-specific antigen-based freedom from disease status in a phase II trial

OBJECTIVES: There is interest in treating prostate cancer with induction androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy. Data on long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based survival analyses among patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and prostatectomy are limited. In 1991 we instituted a pilot study for T3 disease based on endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI), mandatory negative laparoscopic nodal dissection prior to hormonal manipulation, and prostatectomy followed by pathologic and PSA-based outcome determinations. METHODS: Of 26 patients, 21 had negative laparoscopic lymphadenectomy followed by 4 months of NHT (leuprolide +/- flutamide) prior to radical prostatectomy. eMRI was performed at the time of diagnosis and following hormonal treatment. Serum PSA was determined at 3-month intervals. Prostatectomy specimens were evaluated by 3-mm whole-mount step sections. RESULTS: Prior to prostatectomy, biochemical response was documented in all patients and downsizing was observed by eMRI in 57%. Pathologic downstaging to a lower stage (T2c or lower) was achieved in 48%. However, the actuarial 3-year freedom from biochemical relapse rate was only 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Using laparoscopy to exclude node-positive patients and 4 months of NHT appears to result in pathologic and initial biochemical evidence of regression. These factors have not translated into improved freedom from biochemical relapse among patients with Stage T3 disease treated with NHT and prostatectomy. Recent data strongly suggest a beneficial effect in patients with clinical T2 disease treated with NHT and radical prostatectomy. The NGT and radical prostatectomy approach appeared to offer no clear advantage when compared with PSA-based benchmarks achieved with conformal irradiation or NHT followed by external beam treatment among patients with clinical T3 disease.     

Hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy: a 3-year followup

PURPOSE: Hormonal treatment administered before radical prostatectomy has been shown to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins. We determine whether preoperative hormonal treatment has any impact on the subsequent failure rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 122 patients with stages T1bNxM0 to T3aNxM0, grades 1 to 3 prostate cancer, including 64 randomly assigned to immediate radical retropubic prostatectomy and 58 randomly assigned to radical retropubic prostatectomy preceded by 3 months of pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. We performed intention to treat analysis on the data with failure defined as lymph node involvement, serum prostate specific antigen greater than 0.5 ng./ml., or the need for postoperative hormonal or radiation adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The positive margin rate was 23.6 versus 45.5% in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy versus prostatectomy only groups (p = 0.016). There were 20 failures (34.5%) in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy subgroup and 26 (40.6%) in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.48). A negative surgical margin was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression than a positive surgical margin (20.8 versus 50.0%, p = 0.0016), and progression was delayed by approximately 1 year after hormonal pretreatment. However, at a median followup of 38 months there was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Although hormonal pretreatment significantly decreased the positive margin rate, it did not result in any difference in progression-free survival when followup exceeded 3 years. Thus, our current results do not support the routine administration of hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy.     

Impact of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer on the likelihood of curative surgery

BACKGROUND: Extracapsular extension is commonly seen in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer due to understaging of disease. One possible approach to reduce the likelihood of extracapsular disease is androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy, neoadjuvant therapy. However, adequate application is not clear. We analyzed the outcome of neoadjuvant therapy and radical prostatectomy in an attempt to expand our understanding on indications of neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Forty-six selected patients with clinical T1 or T2 prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (group N) that mainly consists of LH-RH agonist. The duration of neoadjuvant therapy, varied from 1 to 12 months with the mean being 4 months. Twenty-four underwent radical prostatectomy alone (group S). RESULTS: In the group N and group S, 59% and 33% had either organ confined disease (OCD) or specimen confined disease (SCD) respectively. When the patients had OCD or SCD, they were defined as surgically cured patients. In the patients with clinical stage T1b, T1c, and T2 disease, likelihood of surgical cure were 100%, 50%, 46.7% in group N, 100%, 20%, 11%, in group S respectively. In the patients with initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml and more than 10.1 ng/ml, likelihood of surgical cure were 83.3% and 50% in group N, 63.6% and 15.4% in group S, respectively. Likelihood of surgical cure was higher in the patients with well differentiated carcinoma both in group N and group S. All the patients with serum PSA less than 0.1 ng/ml after neoadjuvant therapy had OCD. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvent therapy could be beneficial either in the patients with moderately or in the poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of prostate especially in the group with initial serum PSA more than 10.1 ng/ml. However, in patients both with well differentiated adenocarcinoma and the initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml, no evidence of beneficial effect on the likelihood of OCD or SCD was observed. PSA after neoadjuvant therapy could be useful predictor for the pathological outcome.     

Application of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and its outcome

The proportion of patients with localized prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy is increasing rapidly in Japan. As for the qualifications of patient candidates for radical surgery, various clinical and pathological findings to predict tumor extent and disease-free outcome must be considered carefully. There has been increased interest in the application of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for locally advanced tumor group in order to improve disease-free survival and overall survival. The new anatomical approach to radical prostatectomy with its nerve sparing option assures preservation of erection. This procedure achieves excellent cancer control for patients with a definite organ-confined tumor preoperatively. Finally, more time is needed to obtain information on the long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy.     

Early detection of recurrent prostate cancer with an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent prostate-specific antigen assay

OBJECTIVES: Treatment failure after radical prostatectomy is most commonly heralded by an increase in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to detectable levels. We evaluated the clinical utility of an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent PSA assay. METHODS: We evaluated the assay in banked sera obtained from 170 men after radical prostatectomy. Controls consisted of 142 females, 29 men who had undergone cystoprostatectomy without evidence of prostate cancer, and 25 men without evidence of recurrent disease at least 5 years after prostatectomy for organ-confined disease. Lead time to diagnosis of recurrence was based on comparisons with the IMx or Tandem E assays using a cutoff of 0.1 ng/mL (100 pg/mL). RESULTS: The biologic level of detection of this assay is 8 pg/mL. Serum PSA levels were undetectable in 82.4% of females, 86.2% of the cystoprostatectomy patients, and 96% of the radical prostatectomy controls. After radical prostatectomy, PSA levels were undetectable at last check in 104 of 168 (61.9%) men. In the 24 men with prostate cancer recurrence, the enhanced sensitivity of 8 pg/mL provided a mean lead time based on conservative calculations of 12.7 to 22.5 months over conventional assays. Thirty-four of the 41 men with detectable PSA levels and no evidence of disease recurrence had PSA levels of 30 pg/mL or less. CONCLUSIONS: PSA levels are undetectable in most men who do not have recurrence of disease after radical prostatectomy. Low but detectable serum PSA levels less than or equal to 30 pg/mL can be produced by nonmalignant sources of PSA. PSA assays with enhanced sensitivity can detect recurrent prostate cancer with significant lead time over conventional assays.     

Biodistribution studies on L-3-[fluorine-18]fluoro-alpha-methyl tyrosine: a potential tumor-detecting agent

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate a clinical algorithm that predicts nodal status in patients with prostate cancer and to assess the impact on the outcome. METHODS: Between September 1988 and December 1994, 192 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and considered surgical candidates for radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) were stratified using the algorithm: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 20 ng/mL or less, Gleason score 7 or lower, and clinical Stage T2a or lower. Patients failing any of these criteria were placed in the high-risk group and underwent a pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who satisfied all the criteria were placed in the low-risk group and underwent RPP without evaluation of the pelvic lymph nodes. Another contemporaneous cohort of patients (n = 65) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) without use of the algorithm and were used as a control group. Patients were monitored for at least 24 months. RESULTS: In the RPP group, 177 patients were considered low risk according to the algorithm and were not offered staging lymphadenectomy before surgery, whereas 15 patients were categorized as high risk for metastasis and underwent staging lymphadenectomy. In the RRP and lymphadenectomy group, 41 patients were considered at low risk and 24 at high risk of disease spread according to the algorithm. In the RPP group, low-risk patients (no lymphadenectomy) had a PSA recurrence rate (27%) similar to that of low-risk patients in the RRP group with negative lymph nodes (29%), P = 0.8. Similarly, high-risk patients with negative lymph nodes in both groups had a similar recurrence rate (53% for RPP and 50% for RRP). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that PSA was the most significant predictor for disease recurrence (P = 0.0004) followed by preoperative Gleason scores (P = 0.02) and clinical stages (P = 0.03). Multivariate stepwise analysis demonstrated that Gleason score and clinical stage did not add to the prediction of recurrence over PSA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Staging lymphadenectomy can be omitted in low-risk patients without deleterious effects on the outcome as measured by PSA recurrence.     

Reduced space hidden Markov model training

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends in the clinical stage and pathologic outcome of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice during the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing era. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1987 and June 1995, 5,568 patients with prostate cancer (4,774 with clinically localized disease of stage T2c or less) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution. Patient age, preoperative serum PSA level, clinical stage, pathologic stage, Gleason score, and tumor ploidy were assessed. Outcome was based on clinical and PSA (increases in PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or more) progression-free survival. RESULTS: Patient age (65 to 63 years old; P<0.001) and serum PSA level (median, 8.4 to 6.8 ng/mL; P<0.001) decreased during the study period. The percentage of patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer increased from 2.1% in 1987 to 36.4% in 1995 (P<0.001), and clinical stage T3 cancer decreased from 25.3% to 6.5% (P<0.001). Nondiploid tumors decreased from 38.3% to 24.6% (P<0.001), and the proportion of patients with pathologically organ-confined disease increased from 54.9% to 74.3% (P<0.001). More cT1c than cT2 tumors were diploid (80% versus 72%; P<0.001), had a Gleason score of 7 or less (75% versus 65%; P<0.001), and were confined to the prostate (75% versus 57%; P<0.001). Five-year progression-free survival was 85% and 76% for patients with clinical stage T1c and T2, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Since the advent of PSA testing, patients referred to our institution for radical prostatectomy have shown a significant migration to lower-stage, less-nondiploid, more often organ-confined prostate cancer at the time of initial assessment. Cancer-free survival associated with PSA-detected cancer (cT1c) is superior to that with palpable tumors (cT2). Whether these trends translate into improved long-term cancer-specific survival remains to be confirmed with longer follow-up.     

Prevalence of hot flushes during and after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the prevalence of hot flushes after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. METHODS: Forty-three patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding hot flushes. RESULTS: Complete information was available for 35 of the 43 patients. No hot flushes were noted in 20%; in 69%, hot flushes were noted during treatment but resolved after termination of treatment; and in 11%, hot flushes continued for at least 3 months after cessation of hormonal therapy. Analyzing the data with respect to duration of hormonal therapy showed that patients receiving neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for more than 4 months had the highest incidence of persistent hot flushes. CONCLUSIONS: Hot flushes will be noted in 80% of patients who receive neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. In approximately 10%, hot flushes will continue for a significant period after hormonal therapy is terminated. Patients should be apprised of this potential side effect.     

Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies

PURPOSE: Since most patients do not undergo repeat sextant prostate biopsies after a biopsy is positive for prostate cancer, the true incidence of false-negative biopsies is not well defined. We assess the incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 patients with biopsy proved prostate cancer underwent repeat sextant prostate biopsy before enrollment in a prospective randomized trial of radical prostatectomy with or without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Clinical parameters were assessed to determine potential sources of bias. Pathological parameters and prostate specific antigen relapse-free survival rates were compared to determine the clinical significance of false-negative biopsies. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients 27 (23%) had a negative repeat sextant biopsy. Except for initial clinical stage, no differences were noted in the clinical or pathological parameters, or prostate specific antigen relapse rates in patients with negative versus positive repeat biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that this 23% incidence of false-negative biopsies represents significant cancer. This relatively high incidence is important to consider in treatment modalities in which prostate biopsy may be performed to determine response to therapy.     

Hormone ablation therapy as neoadjuvant treatment to radical prostatectomy

Two hundred consecutive patients with presumed localized prostate cancer had radical prostatectomy alone (n = 119) or were treated for an average period of 3 months with combination therapy using the antiandrogen flutamide and one luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (Lupron or Zoladex). The positive margins decreased from 35.3% in the group undergoing prostatectomy alone to 11.5% in the group of men who received combination therapy before radical prostatectomy. In 41 apical tumors, the incidence of positive margins decreased from 50% in the control group to 18.6% in the combination therapy group. In stage C disease, the incidence of positive tumor showed a tendency to decrease with the extended duration of endocrine treatment with a rate of 37.5% after 3 months and 16.7% after 6 months. Whether the decreased incidence of positive surgical margins will all translate into prolonged survival remains to be verified by long-term follow-up of these patients. However, the initial results obtained in the present study are very encouraging.     

A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: A multivariate analysis is used to determine the predictive value of pretreatment clinical indicators on pathologic features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of the pathologic findings of 235 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated between 1990 and 1993 with a radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed. The preoperative clinical data including the serum prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason sum, and endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings are used to identify patients prior to definitive treatment who would be at high risk for having pathologic features associated with local failure at radical prostatectomy. Outcome prediction curves are constructed from a logistic regression multivariate analysis displaying the probability of pathologic involvement of the seminal vesicle, extracapsular disease, or positive surgical margins as a function of the preoperative prostate specific antigen and Gleason sum for the cases when the endorectal magnetic resonance scan is positive, negative, or not included in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Factors identified on multivariate analysis as significant predictors of seminal vesicle invasion include endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings (p < 0.0001), and preoperative prostate specific antigen (p = 0.017). Endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings (p = 0.0016), preoperative prostate specific antigen (p = 0.0002), and Gleason sum (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of extracapsular extension and preoperative prostate specific antigen (p < 0.0001) and Gleason sum (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of disease extending to the margins of resection. Clinical stage was not a significant predictor (p > 0.05) of pathologic features associated with local failure on multivariate analysis. As a single modality, endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging was accurate 93%, 69%, and 72% of the time for predicting seminal vesicle invasion, transcapsular disease, and final pathologic stage, respectively. Failure to recognize microscopic penetration of the capsule found at the time of pathologic evaluation in a prostate gland with a grossly intact capsule accounts for the majority (70%) of the staging inaccuracies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance scan findings in conjunction with both the serum prostate specific antigen and Gleason sum improves the clinical accuracy of predicting those patients at high risk for clinically unsuspected extraprostatic disease. In particular, for the subgroup of patients with moderately elevated prostate specific antigen (> 10-20 ng/mL) and intermediate grade clinically organ confined prostate cancer [Gleason sum: 5-7] where the specificity of these tests to predict for occult extraprostatic disease is suboptimal, the additional information obtained from the endorectal coil magnetic resonance scan allows the physician to definitively subgroup these patients into low and high risk for seminal vesicle invasion or transcapsular disease.     

Disease progression following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason score 7 tumor

PURPOSE: The long-term prognosis of men with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate is uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 488 men whose radical prostatectomy specimen showed Gleason score 7 tumor without involvement of the seminal vesicles or lymph nodes. Of the 400 men without progression 318 had been followed for 2 years or more and 93 for 7 years or more. RESULTS: Cases of organ confined disease and negative margins regardless of extent of extraprostatic extension had roughly similar and better prognoses than cases of focal and established extraprostatic extension with positive margins. The greater influence of margin status on progression (p <0.0001) compared to extent of extraprostatic extension (p = 0.023) was evidenced in the multivariate analysis. Of 30 men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins 6 (20%) had progression to distant metastases, which was similar to 14 of 58 (24%) without established extraprostatic extension and positive margins. There was no difference in response to radiotherapy between men with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins compared to the other cases. CONCLUSIONS: Margins status greatly influences the risk of progression in men with Gleason score 7 tumors. Among men with Gleason score 7 tumors, except for those with established extraprostatic extension and positive margins, more than 50% appear to be cured at long-term followup. Because of the high risk of progression in patients with positive margins, clinical studies of adjuvant therapy in this population appear warranted.     

Construction of a new vector conferring methotrexate resistance in Nicotiana tabacum plants

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the positive fraction of systematic sextant biopsies contributes to the prediction of serologic relapse after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsy and radical prostatectomy was performed. No patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. The relationship between the positive fraction of systematic biopsies and risk of prostate-specific antigen recurrence was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Patients with three or fewer positive sextant biopsies were at a significantly lower risk of relapse after radical prostatectomy than patients with four or more positive biopsies. Tumor grade and systematic biopsy results were the most powerful predictors of serologic relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The positive fraction of systematic biopsies contributes to the prediction of risk of relapse after radical prostatectomy.     

Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images

BACKGROUND: The current histological evaluation of the effects of endocrine therapy has difficulty in distinguishing pathologic degeneration caused by androgen ablation from residual poorly differentiated tumor. Therefore, we examined the changes in cell proliferation and apoptosis before and after endocrine therapy and analyzed whether they correlated with pathologic effects and histological differentiation. METHODS: Between January 1986 and December 1995, 52 patients with clinical stage B2 and C prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (median duration 3.8 months). Proliferative and apoptotic activities of pretreatment biopsy specimens and radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed with MIB-1 monoclonal antibody and in situ end-labeling of fragmented DNA. RESULTS: The mean proliferative index (PI) of radical prostatectomy specimens was significantly lower than that of biopsy specimens (P = 0.000003) and the decrease in PI after endocrine therapy was significantly related to histological differentiation (P = 0.014). There was a weak relationship between the decrease in PI after endocrine therapy and pathologic effects (P = 0.054), while in pathologically effective cases (Grades 2 and 3), three out of 16 (19%) showed a < 50% decrease in PI after endocrine therapy, and may be regarded as having poorly differentiated tumors. The mean apoptotic index (AI) of prostatectomy specimens tended to be higher than that of biopsy specimens (P = 0.054). The increase in AI after endocrine therapy was not related to histological differentiation and pathologic effects. CONCLUSION: Pathologic effects caused by endocrine therapy may be in part misled by routine histopathologic staining and the change in PI may help in recognizing the pathologic effects of endocrine therapy and have adjunctive value for the interpretation of the effects of endocrine therapy.     

Current aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of prostatic cancer]

Prostate cancer is becoming the most frequent malignant disease in men. Its present-day diagnosis in based on the combination of digital rectal examination, detection of the prostate-specific antigen in blood serum and multifocal transrectal biopsy of the prostate under ultrasonic control. The elevation of the level of prostate-specific antigen correlates with spread of the process and extracapsular penetration of the tumor. Asymmetry of the prostate and hypoechogenic foci represent the main ultrasonic signs of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. When the histological findings speak about the absence of atypical cells, another complex examination with rebiopsy is indicated in 6 months. The principal radical method of treatment of prostate cancer is prostatectomy performed mainly for the T1-T2 stages. At the preoperative period the neoadjuvant androgen deprivation can be performed in order to lessen the tumour volume and risk of a positive surgical margin.