Experimental Characterization of the Binding Affinities between Proapoptotic BH3 Peptides and Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 Proteins

The Bcl‐2 family proteins are key regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and are among the validated targets for developing anticancer drugs. Protein–protein interactions between the pro‐ and antiapoptotic members of this family determine mitochondrial outer‐membrane permeabilization. Elucidating such protein–protein interactions in a quantitative way is helpful for network pharmacology studies on the Bcl‐2 family, which, in turn, will provide valuable guidance for developing new anticancer therapies. In this study, the binding affinities of the BH3 peptides derived from eight proapoptotic BH3‐only proteins (i.e., Bid, Bim, Puma, Noxa, Bad, Bmf, Bik, Hrk) against five well‐studied antiapoptotic proteins (i.e., Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, Mcl‐1, Bcl‐w, Bfl‐1) in the Bcl‐2 family have been measured. Three different types of binding assay (i.e., surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence polarization, and homogeneous time‐resolved fluorescence) were employed for cross‐validation. The results confirmed that each proapoptotic BH3 peptide exhibited a distinct binding profile against the five antiapoptotic proteins. The binding data obtained herein serve as a fresh update or correction to existing knowledge. It is expected that such binding data will be helpful for building more accurate mathematical network models for depicting the complex protein–protein interactions within the Bcl‐2 family.     

Development of 3‐Phenyl‐N‐(2‐(3‐phenylureido)ethyl)‐thiophene‐2‐sulfonamide Compounds as Inhibitors of Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 Family Proteins

Antiapoptotic Bcl‐2 family proteins, such as Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1, are often overexpressed in tumor cells, which contributes to tumor cell resistance to chemotherapies and radiotherapies. Inhibitors of these proteins thus have potential applications in cancer treatment. We discovered, through structure‐based virtual screening, a lead compound with micromolar binding affinity to Mcl‐1 (inhibition constant (K_i)=3 μM ). It contains a phenyltetrazole and a hydrazinecarbothioamide moiety, and it represents a structural scaffold not observed among known Bcl‐2 inhibitors. This work presents the structural optimization of this lead compound. By following the scaffold‐hopping strategy, we have designed and synthesized a total of 82 compounds in three sets. All of the compounds were evaluated in a fluorescence‐polarization binding assay to measure their binding affinities to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1. Some of the compounds with a 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety showed sub‐micromolar binding affinities to Mcl‐1 (K_i=0.3–0.4 μM ) or Bcl‐2 (K_i≈1 μM ). They also showed obvious cytotoxicity on tumor cells (IC₅₀<10 μM ). Two‐dimensional heteronuclear single quantum coherence NMR spectra of three selected compounds, that is, YCW‐E5, YCW‐E10, and YCW‐E11, indicated that they bind to the BH3‐binding groove on Bcl‐x_L in a similar mode to ABT‐737. Several apoptotic assays conducted on HL‐60 cells demonstrated that these compounds are able to induce cell apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway. We propose that the compounds with the 3‐phenylthiophene‐2‐sulfonamide core moiety are worth further optimization as effective apoptosis inducers with an interesting selectivity towards Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐2.     

Discovery and development of thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidinone derivatives as general inhibitors of Bcl-2 family proteins

A class of compounds with a common thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyrimidinone motif has been developed as general inhibitors of Bcl‐2 family proteins. The lead compound was originally identified in a random screening of a small compound library using a fluorescence polarization‐based competitive binding assay. Its binding to the Bcl‐x_L protein was further confirmed by ¹⁵N‐HSQC NMR experiments. Structural modifications on the lead compound were guided by the outcomes of molecular modeling studies. Among the 42 compounds obtained, a number of them exhibited much improved binding affinities to Bcl‐2 family proteins as compared to the lead compound. The most potent compound, BCL‐LZH‐ 40 , inhibited the binding of BH3 peptides to Bcl‐x_L, Bcl‐2, and Mcl‐1 with inhibition constants (K_i) of 17, 534, and 200 nM , respectively.     

Structure and Function of Benzoylurea‐Derived α‐Helix Mimetics Targeting the Bcl‐xL/Bak Binding Interface

Targeting Bcl‐x _L /Bak : A family of rationally designed α‐helix mimetics with improved solubility and synthetic feasibility based on a benzoylurea scaffold is presented. These benzoylurea derivatives favor a linear conformation stabilized by an intramolecular hydrogen bond, and are able to mimic the spatial projection of the i, i+4, and i+7 residues of an α‐helix. Binding affinities of the benzoylurea derivatives to Bcl‐x_L have been assessed using fluorescence polarization competition assays and isothermal titration calorimetry.

     

Synthetic Inhibitors of Extended Helix–Protein Interactions Based on a Biphenyl 4,4′‐Dicarboxamide Scaffold

Turn Bak : We present rationally designed scaffolds that mimic the spatial projection of the i, i+4, i+7, and i+11 residues of an α‐helix. A library of biphenyl derivatives was shown by competition fluorescence polarization and ITC to mimic Bak and disrupt the Bak/Bcl‐x_L protein–protein interaction. ¹⁵N HSQC experiments confirmed that the surface of Bcl‐x_L normally occupied by Bak was the target area of our new synthetic inhibitors.

     

Rational Design,Binding Studies,and Crystal‐Structure Evaluation of the First Ligand Targeting the Dimerization Interface of the 14‐3‐3ζ Adapter Protein

14‐3‐3 Proteins play a central role in signalling pathways in cells: they interact as gatekeeper proteins with a huge number of binding partners. Their function as hub for intracellular communication can explain why these adapter proteins are associated with a wide range of diseases. How they control the various cellular mechanisms is still unclear, but it is assumed that the dimeric nature of the 14‐3‐3 proteins plays a key role in their activity. Here, we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first example of a small molecule binding to the 14‐3‐3ζ dimerisation interface. This compound was designed by rational in silico optimisation of a peptidic ligand identified from biochemical screening of a peptidic library, and the binding was characterised by UV/Vis spectroscopy, microscale thermophoresis, multiscale simulations, and X‐ray crystallography.     

A Highly Potent and Cellularly Active β‐Peptidic Inhibitor of the p53/hDM2 Interaction

New and improved : The incorporation of a 6‐chlorotryptophan (6‐Cl‐Trp) into a β‐peptide (M)‐3₁₄ helix leads to a high‐affinity hDM2 inhibitor, as demonstrated by fluorescence fluctuation analysis at single molecule resolution. When conjugated to penetratin, the newly derived hDM2 binder specifically inhibits tumour cell growth in vitro.

     

Small‐Molecule Inhibitors That Target Protein–Protein Interactions in the RAD51 Family of Recombinases

The development of small molecules that inhibit protein–protein interactions continues to be a challenge in chemical biology and drug discovery. Herein we report the development of indole‐based fragments that bind in a shallow surface pocket of a humanised surrogate of RAD51. RAD51 is an ATP‐dependent recombinase that plays a key role in the repair of double‐strand DNA breaks. It both self‐associates, forming filament structures with DNA, and interacts with the BRCA2 protein through a common “FxxA” tetrapeptide motif. We elaborated previously identified fragment hits that target the FxxA motif site and developed small‐molecule inhibitors that are approximately 500‐fold more potent than the initial fragments. The lead compounds were shown to compete with the BRCA2‐derived Ac‐FHTA‐NH₂ peptide and the self‐association peptide of RAD51, but they had no effect on ATP binding. This study is the first reported elaboration of small‐molecular‐weight fragments against this challenging target.     

De Novo Design,Synthesis and Evaluation of Benzylpiperazine Derivatives as Highly Selective Binders of Mcl‐1

Considerable efforts have been made to the development of small‐molecule inhibitors of antiapoptotic B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2) family proteins (such as Bcl‐2, Bcl‐x_L, and Mcl‐1) as a new class of anticancer therapies. Unlike general inhibitors of the entire family, selective inhibitors of each member protein can hopefully reduce the adverse side effects in chemotherapy treatments of cancers overexpressing different Bcl‐2 family proteins. In this study, we designed four series of benzylpiperazine derivatives as plausible Bcl‐2 inhibitors based on the outcomes of a computational algorithm. A total of 81 compounds were synthesized, and their binding affinities to Bcl‐2, Bcl‐x_L, and Mcl‐1 measured. Encouragingly, 22 compounds exhibited binding affinities in the micromolar range (K_i<20 μM ) to at least one target protein. Moreover, some compounds were observed to be highly selective binders to Mcl‐1 with no detectable binding to Bcl‐2 or Bcl‐x_L, among which the most potent one has a K_i value of 0.18 μM for Mcl‐1. Binding modes of four selected compounds to Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐x_L were derived through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. It seems that the binding affinity and selectivity of these compounds can be reasonably interpreted with these models. Our study demonstrated the possibility for obtaining selective Mcl‐1 inhibitors with relatively simple chemical scaffolds. The active compounds identified by us could be used as lead compounds for developing even more potent selective Mcl‐1 inhibitors with potential pharmaceutical applications.     

Rigidified Clicked Dimeric Ligands for Studying the Dynamics of the PDZ1‐2 Supramodule of PSD‐95

PSD‐95 is a scaffolding protein of the MAGUK protein family, and engages in several vital protein–protein interactions in the brain with its PDZ domains. It has been suggested that PSD‐95 is composed of two supramodules, one of which is the PDZ1‐2 tandem domain. Here we have developed rigidified high‐affinity dimeric ligands that target the PDZ1‐2 supramodule, and established the biophysical parameters of the dynamic PDZ1‐2/ligand interactions. By employing ITC, protein NMR, and stopped‐flow kinetics this study provides a detailed insight into the overall conformational energetics of the interaction between dimeric ligands and tandem PDZ domains. Our findings expand our understanding of the dynamics of PSD‐95 with potential relevance to its biological role in interacting with multivalent receptor complexes and development of novel drugs.     

Thermal Intramolecular [2+2] Cycloaddition: Synthesis of 3‐Azabicyclo[3.1.1]heptanes from Morita–Baylis–Hillman Adduct‐Derived 4,4‐Diaryl‐1,3‐dienes

Various 3‐azabicyclo[3.1.1]heptane derivatives were synthesized from Morita–Baylis–Hillman adduct‐derived 1,3‐dienes bearing a 4,4‐diaryl moiety through a thermal intramolecular [2+2] cycloaddition approach. By using the same approach, bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane, 3‐azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane, and 3‐oxabicyclo[3.1.1]heptane derivatives could also be synthesized. A structurally similar dimethylallyl derivative underwent an intramolecular ene reaction to afford the pyrrolidine derivative.

     

Selective Targeting of the TPX2 Site of Importin‐α Using Fragment‐Based Ligand Design

Protein–protein interactions are difficult therapeutic targets, and inhibiting pathologically relevant interactions without disrupting other essential ones presents an additional challenge. Herein we report how this might be achieved for the potential anticancer target, the TPX2–importin‐α interaction. Importin‐α is a nuclear transport protein that regulates the spindle assembly protein TPX2. It has two binding sites—major and minor—to which partners bind. Most nuclear transport cargoes use the major site, whereas TPX2 binds principally to the minor site. Fragment‐based approaches were used to identify small molecules that bind importin‐α, and crystallographic studies identified a lead series that was observed to bind specifically to the minor site, representing the first ligands specific for this site. Structure‐guided synthesis informed the elaboration of these fragments to explore the source of ligand selectivity between the minor and major sites. These ligands are starting points for the development of inhibitors of this protein–protein interaction.     

Biophysical Studies of the Amyloid β‐Peptide: Interactions with Metal Ions and Small Molecules

Alzheimer's disease is the most common of the protein misfolding (“amyloid”) diseases. The deposits in the brains of afflicted patients contain as a major fraction an aggregated insoluble form of the so‐called amyloid β‐peptides (Aβ peptides): fragments of the amyloid precursor protein of 39–43 residues in length. This review focuses on biophysical studies of the Aβ peptides: that is, of the aggregation pathways and intermediates observed during aggregation, of the molecular structures observed along these pathways, and of the interactions of Aβ with Cu and Zn ions and with small molecules that modify the aggregation pathways. Particular emphasis is placed on studies based on high‐resolution and solid‐state NMR methods. Theoretical studies relating to the interactions are also included. An emerging picture is that of Aβ peptides in aqueous solution undergoing hydrophobic collapse together with identical partners. There then follows a relatively slow process leading to more ordered secondary and tertiary (quaternary) structures in the growing aggregates. These aggregates eventually assemble into elongated fibrils visible by electron microscopy. Small molecules or metal ions that interfere with the aggregation processes give rise to a variety of aggregation products that may be studied in vitro and considered in relation to observations in cell cultures or in vivo. Although the heterogeneous nature of the processes makes detailed structural studies difficult, knowledge and understanding of the underlying physical chemistry might provide a basis for future therapeutic strategies against the disease. A final part of the review deals with the interactions that may occur between the Aβ peptides and the prion protein, where the latter is involved in other protein misfolding diseases.