Role of signals for unconditioned stimulus absence in the sensitivity of autoshaping to contingency.

Pigeons autoshape to a keylight conditioned stimulus (CS) that is poorly correlated with a food unconditioned stimulus (UCS) if UCSs occurring in the absence of the CS are signaled by some other cue. Three experiments examined if this is because signaling blocks context conditioning or because it converts the intertrial interval (ITI) into a predictor of UCS absence. Results indicated that cuing periods of UCS absence was not sufficient for acquisition. Signaling failed to produce acquisition if the signal also accompanied the CS, although this procedure converts the ITI into a predictor of UCS absence. The detrimental effect of compounding the signal with the CS occurred only if the signal was separately paired with the UCS, which suggests it was due to blocking of the CS by the signal. The results suggested that the signaling effect depends on blocking of the context by the signal, not on conversion of the ITI into a signal for UCS absence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.

Context–UCS associations have been suggested as the mediator of the response decrement that occurs when extra UCSs are added to the intertrial intervals (ITIs) of a standard Pavlovian conditioning situation. The present autoshaping experiments were concerned with the effect of signaling those extra UCSs, since such signaling might be expected to lessen their ability to condition the context. In Exp I, 16 female Carneaux pigeons were trained in Skinner boxes before receiving pretraining with the CS to be used as the signal of the ITI UCSs. During the main training, Ss were given autoshaping with a keylight CS. Exp II used a tone CS with 31 Ss. Results show that signaling the ITI UCSs did reduce their detrimental effects in responding to the CS. To determine whether that reduction was due to an impact of signaling on the target-CS/UCS association or on performance to the target-CS, Exp III examined responding to differentially trained CSs in a common context, as well as responding to identically trained CSs in differentially trained contexts with 32 Ss. More responding occurred to the CS trained with signaled, as compared with unsignaled, ITI UCSs; further, there was more responding to that CS in the more highly valued context. Results suggest that contextual value does interact with CS–UCS learning and may also affect performance to the CS. (42 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Intertrial interval as a contextual stimulus: Further analysis of a novel asymmetry in temporal discrimination learning.

Four experiments investigated discrimination learning when the duration of the intertrial interval (ITI) signaled whether or not the next conditional stimulus (CS) would be paired with food pellets. Rats received presentations of a 10-s CS separated half the time by long ITIs and half the time by short ITIs. When the long ITI signaled that the CS would be reinforced and the short interval signaled that it would not be (Long+/Short?), rats learned the discrimination readily. However, when the short ITI signaled that the CS would be reinforced and the long interval signaled that it would not (Short+/Long?), discrimination learning was much slower. Experiment 1 compared Long+/Short? and Short+/Long? discrimination learning with 16-min/4-min or 4-min/1-min ITI combinations. Experiment 2 found no evidence that Short+/Long? learning is inferior because the temporal cue corresponding to the short interval is ambiguous. Experiment 3 found no evidence that Short+/Long? learning is poor because the end of a long ITI signals a substantial reduction in delay to the next reinforcer. Long+/Short? learning may be faster than Short+/Long?because elapsing time involves exposure to a sequence of hypothetical stimulus elements (e.g., A then B), and feature-positive discriminations (AB+/A?) are learned quicker than feature-negative discriminations (A+/AB?). Consistent with this view, Experiment 4 found a robust feature-positive effect when sequentially presented CSs played the role of elements A and B. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Overshadowing and stimulus duration.

In 3 experiments, the authors investigated the effect of stimulus duration on overshadowing. Experiments 1 and 2 examined responding to a target conditioned stimulus (CS1) when it was conditioned in compound with a coterminating overshadowing stimulus (CS2) that was longer, shorter, or of the same duration (the long, short, and matched groups, respectively). Equal overshadowing of conditioning to CS1 was obtained in all 3 conditions relative to a control group conditioned to the light alone. There were, however, differences in responding to CS2 as a function of its absolute duration. Experiment 3 examined the contribution of the food-food interval/CS onset-food interval ratio to these findings. In Experiments 1 and 2, the ratio differed for the overshadowing CS but not for the target CS. In Experiment 3, this arrangement was reversed, but the pattern of results remained the same. The implications of these findings for trial-based and real-time models of conditioning are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Importance of relative temporal parameters in trace autoshaping: From excitation to inhibition.

Studied the role of the relative durations of CS–UCS gap and intertrial interval (ITI) in 2 autotracing experiments. In Exp I, CS–UCS gap duration was held constant at 12 sec, and the ITI was systematically varied between 15 and 240 sec across 5 groups of 6 female White Carneaux pigeons. Conditioned excitation (CS-approach) emerged at ITIs of greater than 60 sec, and conditioned inhibition (CS-withdrawal) emerged at ITIs of less than 60 sec. In Exp II, with 50 Ss, the time between successive UCSs averaged 87 sec, and the duration of the CS–UCS gap varied from 6 to 72 sec. CS-approach was observed only in the 6-sec gap condition, and CS-withdrawal developed with gaps of 24 sec or more. Findings indicate that the relative durations of CS–UCS gap and the ITI are more important than is the absolute degree of CS–UCS contiguity in determining whether and what type of conditioning occurs on trace arrangements. (35 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Topography of sexually conditioned behavior in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) depends on the CS–US interval.

The interval between exposure to a CS to male quail and access to a female (the unconditioned stimulus [UCS]) was varied from 0.5 to 20 min using a Pavlovian delayed conditioning procedure. Increasing the CS–UCS interval altered the spatial distribution of sexual conditioned behavior. With a short CS–UCS interval (1 min), conditioning resulted in the Ss remaining close to the CS and increasing their locomotor behavior near the CS. With a long CS–UCS interval (20 min), the Ss approached the CS to some degree, but their locomotor behavior was increased in areas farther removed from the CS. Results are interpreted within the context of a behavior systems approach to the study of learning and indicate that the typical finding of an inverse relation between conditioned responding and the CS–UCS interval may be an artifact of the use of a limited range or behavioral measures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Slow reacquisition following extinction: Context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms.

Investigated the slow reacquisition (RAQ) of responding in rats that occurs when the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) are paired again after prolonged extinction training. In Exp 1, an extinguished CS acquired less suppression than a novel CS during a final conditioning phase, but more suppression than CSs that had received comparable nonreinforcement without initial conditioning. In Exp 2, CS–UCS pairings resumed in the context of extinction caused the least RAQ of suppression: Pairings in a neutral context produced better RAQ, while return of the CS to the conditioning context caused an immediate renewal of responding to the CS. In Exp 3, a return of the CS to the extinction context after RAQ training caused renewed extinction performance and interfered with performance appropriate to RAQ. This effect was not due to demonstrable inhibitory conditioning of the extinction context. Results suggest that representations of conditioning and extinction (or CS–UCS and CS–no UCS relations) are both retained through extinction and that performance appropriate to either phase can be cued by the corresponding context. RAQ may thus be slow when the context retrieves an extinction memory. Similar mechanisms may also play a role in other Pavlovian interference paradigms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of US duration on classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Attempted to distinguish the effects of UCS duration based on explicit pairings with the CS from the consequences of sheer exposure to the UCS in the rabbit nictitating membrane response. 228 albino rabbits received various proportions of CS (a 1,000-Hz tone) and UCS (a 60-Hz shock). Exp I revealed that there was an inverse relation between the overall level of CR acquisition and UCS durations of 50, l,500, and 6,000 msec. In addition, decrements in CR likelihood occurred within the daily sessions of 90 CS–UCS trials, and the magnitude of these within-session decrements was directly related to UCS duration. In Exp II, UCS duration of 50 and 6,000 msec were paired with the CS. When UCS exposure was equated, the UCS duration paired with the CS had a positive effect on CR likelihood. Conversely, in Exp III, the duration of interpolated UCSs had inverse effects on the rate of CR acquisition. In Exp IV, the opportunity for within-session decrements was eliminated by presenting only 1 CS–UCS trial per day, which resulted in a positive relation between CR likelihood and UCS duration. Results are discussed in terms of associative and performance hypotheses. (54 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Comparison of the rates of associative change during acquisition and extinction.

Five experiments used a compound test procedure to compare the rate parameters for the associative changes resulting from reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Experiments I and 4, using a magazineapproach procedure in rats, found initial acquisition to proceed more rapidly but to generalize less broadly than extinction. Experiments 2 and 5 repeated these observations in an autoshaping preparation with pigeons. Experiment 3 found no evidence for differential disruption of acquisition and extinction in testing. These results were obtained in a test procedure that compares responding with stimulus compounds in order to remove the differences in overall performance, which have complicated inferences about associative changes in earlier experiments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of time of testing, stress level, and number of conditioning days on naloxone sensitivity of conditioned stress-induced analgesia in rats.

In 2 experiments, an anticipatory conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) and a shock-associated CS were used. Duration of exposure to the anticipatory CS was long, as in studies reporting opioid conditioned stress-induced analgesia (CSIA), whereas duration of shock-associated CS was short, as in nonopioid CSIA. Effects of unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) strength were investigated by using 3 levels of footshock, and the development of CSIA was monitored by using different levels of training (1–6 days). CSIA, measured in both anticipatory and postexposure test periods, was found to be relatively stable across tail-flick trials within days and insensitive to strength of shock. As training progressed, CSIA increased with repeated CS–UCS pairings. We tested for opioid involvement using naloxone and found opioid and nonopioid mechanisms underlying CSIA; these mechanisms combined to form a stable level of analgesia. Data suggest that stress level and amount of training interact to activate opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of CSIA. Discrepancies in previous studies regarding naloxone sensitivity may be attributable to differences in stress levels, test periods, and durations of exposure to shock-related cues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of context in autoshaping.

Three experiments used an autoshaping procedure in 64 female White Carneaux pigeons to investigate the conditioning of the context and of a discrete CS with a food UCS. CS–UCS associations were measured by directed pecking at the key light CS; context–UCS associations were assessed by general activity in the context. Exp I investigated the influence of context–UCS associations on performance to a previously trained CS. The same CS produced greater keypecking in a context of higher associative strength. Exp II examined the influence of context–UCS associations on learning of CS–UCS associations. When tested in a context of fixed associative strength, a CS that had been trained in a context of high associative strength elicited less responding than one trained in a context of low associative strength. Exp III found that signaling a UCS by a discrete CS interfered with the formation of context–UCS associations, as measured both in terms of general activity and ability to promote responding to another CS. Results suggest that the context and the CS compete for association with the UCS. They also suggest that context–UCS associations facilitate the exhibition of CS–UCS associations. (17 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Associative regulation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: Unconditioned stimulus intensity, incentive shifts, and latent inhibition.

Conditional stimuli (CS) associated with painful unconditional stimuli (UCS) produce a naloxone-reversible analgesia. The analgesia serves as a negative-feedback regulation of fear conditioning that can account for the impact of UCS intensity and CS predictiveness on Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Exp 1, training under naloxone produced learning curves that approached the same high asymptote despite UCS intensity. Shifting drug treatment during acquisition had effects that paralleled UCS intensity shifts. In Exp 3, naloxone reversed Hall-Pearce (1979) negative transfer using a contextual CS, indicating that conditional analgesia acquired during the CS–weak-footshock phase retards acquisition in the CS–strong-footshock phase. Exp 5 used a tone CS in both a latent-inhibition and a negative-transfer procedure. Only negative transfer was blocked by naloxone. Therefore, negative transfer but not latent inhibition is mediated by a reduction of UCS processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Overshadowing and summation in compound stimulus conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Examined acquisition of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response to a light?+?tone simultaneous compound stimulus and its components as a function of the intensity of the tone. In Exp I, the tone intensity was varied across the values of 85, 89, and 93 db, and the CS–UCS interval was 400 msec. In Exp II, the tone intensities were 73, 85, and 93 db, and the CS–UCS interval was 800 msec. Exps III and IV further examined the effects of the 73-db CS–UCS tone at CS–UCS intervals of 400 and 800 msec. All experiments included control groups, which were trained with either a light or a tone CS. Overall results show repeated instances of overshadowing: the impairment of CR acquisition to one or both of the components of a compound. Two types of summation were obtained: within-Ss summation, in which Ss trained with a compound showed a higher level of responding to the compound than to either of its component CSs; and between-groups summation, in which a group trained with a compound showed faster CR acquisition than either of its corresponding control groups trained with a single CS. Results are discussed in terms of perceptual and distributive processing models of compound stimulus conditioning. (37 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.

In Exp I, 16 New Zealand white rabbits were trained to perform an instrumental head-raising response for sucrose reward. A jaw-movement CR was established to a 2-sec CS by pairing it with sucrose; a control stimulus was unpaired with sucrose. Instrumental responding maintained by a VI 40-sec schedule was enhanced during 10-sec presentations of the paired, but not the unpaired, CS. Responding on a VR 15 schedule was unaffected except on trials on which the pre-CS baseline response rate was low; in such cases the paired CS caused a long-lasting acceleration of responding. Noncontingent presentation of the sucrose reinforcer itself briefly suppressed responding but had no long-term effect. In Exp II (6 Ss), a CS that had been conditioned at a 10-sec duration produced the same pattern of effects as in Exp I, indicating that facilitation resulted from CS presentation rather than from the frustrative effects of nonreinforcement of the CS. In Exp III (16 Ss), an inhibitory CS blocked facilitation by the excitatory CS but did not itself affect instrumental responding. (53 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Excitatory conditioning of individual Drosophila melanogaster..

Demonstrated, in 5 studies, conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex in D. melanogaster. The presentation of paired (conditioning) stimuli produced (a) an increase in the average number of conditioned responses (CRs) over trials, (b) measured differences in performance levels among individual Ss, and (c) greater conditioning among males than females. The presentation of unpaired (control) stimuli produced significantly lower average levels of acquisition responding and a change in the distribution of individual response patterns. Neither central excitatory state nor sensitization induced by the conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS) or the unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS) directly affected the CR, whereas UCS preexposure adversely affected performance levels. Presenting the unpaired (extinction) stimuli after conditioning produced less of a decline in responding than did an extinction procedure with removal of the UCS. With the ability to identify individual differences in acquisition and extinction patterns, and given the relatively large samples that can be tested simultaneously on the automated stimulation apparatus, it is suggested that it is now possible to make precise behavioral measurements for the behavior-genetic analysis of D. melanogaster with conditioning as the phenotype. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Four experiments with rats examined partial reinforcement in appetitive conditioning. In Experiment 1, adding nonreinforced trials to a continuous reinforcement schedule slowed acquisition, whereas deleting reinforcers did not. Trial massing suppressed performance and learning. In Experiment 2, conditioning with a short conditioned stimulus (CS) was rapid, and partial reinforcement with a short CS was as effective as continuous reinforcement with equal accumulated time in the CS. In Experiment 3, conditioning was nevertheless influenced by the probability of reinforcement. In Experiments 3 and 4, conditioning was especially disrupted when nonreinforced trials preceded reinforced trials closely in time. The results underscore the importance of temporal variables in conditioning but are more consistent with trial-based accounts than time-accumulation accounts of conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioning across the duration of a backward conditioned stimulus.

Five conditioned suppression experiments examined the extent to which an appetitively motivated lever-press response can be punished by different components of a backward conditioned stimulus (CS). Using a 0-s unconditioned stimulus UCS–CS interval, Experiments 1 and 2 showed that the initial 3 s of a normally 30-s backward CS served as a more effective punisher than the CS as a whole, Experiment 3 found no such effect if the UCS–CS interval were 3 s rather than 0 s. Experiments 4A and 4B found that if the UCS–CS interval were 0 s, the initial part of the backward CS acquired excitatory properties although the CS as a whole passed a summation test for conditioned inhibition. By contrast, the 3-s UCS–CS interval supported inhibitory conditioning across the whole duration of the backward CS. Taken together, these findings support a modified version of Wagner's sometimes opponent process model, which suggests that different components of a backward CS become either excitatory or inhibitory depending on the components' temporal proximity to the UCS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Hippocampectomy disrupts acquisition and retention of learned conditional responding.

Two experiments, with 34 male Sprague-Dawley rats, investigated the effects of bilateral hippocampal and neocortical lesions on acquisition and retention of CRs based on simple associations, a nonconditional discrimination, and a conditional discrimination. Results show that combined hippocampal and neocortical damage permanently prevented (within the limits tested) both acquisition and retention of learned behavior based on the conditional discrimination, but it had no effect on behaviors based on the nonconditional discrimination or simple associations. Neocortical lesions alone had no effect on either conditional or nonconditional discriminative responding, but they did temporarily disrupt acquisition and retention of behavior dependent on CS–CS associations. Neither lesion affected learned behaviors mediated by CS–UCS associations. Results show that hippocampal damage selectively disrupted learned conditional behaviors and also revealed that CNS control of conditional discrimination performance, within-compound associations, and CS–UCS associations is mediated by different neural mechanisms. (38 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction-mediated recovery from the relative stimulus validity effect: A test of acquisition and performance models of empirical retrospective revaluation.

Empirical retrospective revaluation is a phenomenon of Pavlovian conditioning and human causal judgment in which posttraining changes in the conditioned response (Pavlovian task) or causal rating (causal judgment task) of a cue occurs in the absence of further training with that cue. Two experiments tested the contrasting predictions made by 2 families of models concerning retrospective revaluation effects. In a conditioned lick-suppression task, rats were given relative stimulus validity training, consisting of reinforcing a compound of conditioned stimuli (CSs) A and X and nonreinforcement of a compound of CSs B and X, which resulted in low conditioned responding to CS X. Massive posttraining extinction of CS A not only enhanced excitatory responding to CS X, but caused CS B to pass both summation (Experiment 1) and retardation (Experiment 2) tests for conditioned inhibition. The inhibitory status of CS B is predicted by the performance-focused extended comparator hypothesis (J. C. Denniston, H. I. Savastano, & R. R. Miller, 2001), but not by acquisition-focused models of empirical retrospective revaluation (e.g., A. Dickinson & J. Burke, 1996; L. J. Van Hamme & E. A. Wasserman, 1994). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)