Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL-bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling

An unresolved key issue in the mechanism of protein folding assisted by the molecular chaperone GroEL is the nature of the substrate protein bound to the chaperonin at different stages of its reaction cycle. Here we describe the conformational properties of human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) bound to GroEL at different stages of its ATP-driven folding reaction, determined by hydrogen exchange labeling and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Considerable protection involving about 20 hydrogens is observed in DHFR bound to GroEL in the absence of ATP. Analysis of the line width of peaks in the mass spectra, together with fluorescence quenching and ANS binding studies, suggest that the bound DHFR is partially folded, but contains stable structure in a small region of the polypeptide chain. DHFR rebound to GroEL 3 min after initiating its folding by the addition of MgATP was also examined by hydrogen exchange, fluorescence quenching, and ANS binding. The results indicate that the extent of protection of the substrate protein rebound to GroEL is indistinguishable from that of the initial bound state. Despite this, small differences in the quenching coefficient and ANS binding properties are observed in the rebound state. On the basis of these results, we suggest that GroEL-assisted folding of DHFR occurs by minor structural adjustments to the partially folded substrate protein during iterative cycling, rather than by complete unfolding of this protein substrate on the chaperonin surface.     

SCL 90-R interpretation and brain tumour: a correction factor?

Two models are being considered for the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding in E. coli: (i) GroEL/GroES act primarily by enclosing substrate polypeptide in a folding cage in which aggregation is prevented during folding. (ii) GroEL mediates the repetitive unfolding of misfolded polypeptides, returning them onto a productive folding track. Both models are not mutually exclusive, but studies with the polypeptide-binding domain of GroEL have suggested that unfolding is the primary mechanism, enclosure being unnecessary. Here we investigate the capacity of the isolated apical polypeptide-binding domain to functionally replace the complete GroEL/GroES system. We show that the apical domain binds aggregation-sensitive polypeptides but cannot significantly assist their refolding in vitro and fails to replace the groEL gene or to complement defects of groEL mutants in vivo. A single-ring version of GroEL cannot substitute for GroEL. These results strongly support the view that sequestration of aggregation-prone intermediates in a folding cage is an important element of the chaperonin mechanism.     

Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis

As a basic principle, assisted protein folding by GroEL has been proposed to involve the disruption of misfolded protein structures through ATP hydrolysis and interaction with the cofactor GroES. Here, we describe chaperonin subreactions that prompt a re-examination of this view. We find that GroEL-bound substrate polypeptide can induce GroES cycling on and off GroEL in the presence of ADP. This mechanism promotes efficient folding of the model protein rhodanese, although at a slower rate than in the presence of ATP. Folding occurs when GroES displaces the bound protein into the sequestered volume of the GroEL cavity. Resulting native protein leaves GroEL upon GroES release. A single-ring variant of GroEL is also fully functional in supporting this reaction cycle. We conclude that neither the energy of ATP hydrolysis nor the allosteric coupling of the two GroEL rings is directly required for GroEL/GroES-mediated protein folding. The minimal mechanism of the reaction is the binding and release of GroES to a polypeptide-containing ring of GroEL, thereby closing and opening the GroEL folding cage. The role of ATP hydrolysis is mainly to induce conformational changes in GroEL that result in GroES cycling at a physiologically relevant rate.     

Interaction of GroEL with a highly structured folding intermediate: iterative binding cycles do not involve unfolding

The GroE proteins are molecular chaperones involved in protein folding. The general mechanism by which they facilitate folding is still enigmatic. One of the central open questions is the conformation of the GroEL-bound nonnative protein. Several suggestions have been made concerning the folding stage at which a protein can interact with GroEL. Furthermore, the possibility exists that binding of the nonnative protein to GroEL results in its unfolding. We have addressed these issues that are basic for understanding the GroE-mediated folding cycle by using folding intermediates of an Fab antibody fragment as molecular probes to define the binding properties of GroEL. We show that, in addition to binding to an early folding intermediate, GroEL is able to recognize and interact with a late quaternary-structured folding intermediate (Dc) without measurably unfolding it. Thus, the prerequisite for binding is not a certain folding stage of a nonnative protein. In contrast, general surface properties of nonnative proteins seem to be crucial for binding. Furthermore, unfolding of a highly structured intermediate does not necessarily occur upon binding to GroEL. Folding of Dc in the presence of GroEL and ATP involves cycles of binding and release. Because in this system no off-pathway reactions or kinetic traps are involved, a quantitative analysis of the reactivation kinetics observed is possible. Our results indicate that the association reaction of Dc and GroEL in the presence of ATP is rather slow, whereas in the absence of ATP association is several orders of magnitude more efficient. Therefore, it seems that ATP functions by inhibiting reassociation rather than promoting release of the bound substrate.     

Potato leafroll virus binds to the equatorial domain of the aphid endosymbiotic GroEL homolog

A GroEL homolog with a molecular mass of 60 kDa, produced by the primary endosymbiotic bacterium (a Buchnera sp.) of Myzus persicae and released into the hemolymph, has previously been shown to be a key protein in the transmission of potato leafroll virus (PLRV). Like other luteoviruses and pea enation mosaic virus, PLRV readily binds to extracellular Buchnera GroEL, and in vivo interference in this interaction coincides with reduced capsid integrity and loss of infectivity. To gain more knowledge of the nature of the association between PLRV and Buchnera GroEL, the groE operon of the primary endosymbiont of M. persicae (MpB groE) and its flanking sequences were characterized and the PLRV-binding domain of Buchnera GroEL was identified by deletion mutant analysis. MpB GroEL has extensive sequence similarity (92%) with Escherichia coli GroEL and other members of the chaperonin-60 family. The genomic organization of the Buchnera groE operon is similar to that of the groE operon of E. coli except that a constitutive promoter sequence could not be identified; only the heat shock promoter was present. By a virus overlay assay of protein blots, it was shown that purified PLRV bound as efficiently to recombinant MpB GroEL (expressed in E. coli) as it did to wild-type MpB GroEL. Mutational analysis of the gene encoding MpB GroEL revealed that the PLRV-binding site was located in the so-called equatorial domain and not in the apical domain which is generally involved in polypeptide binding and folding. Buchnera GroEL mutants lacking the entire equatorial domain or parts of it lost the ability to bind PLRV. The equatorial domain is made up of two regions at the N and C termini that are not contiguous in the amino acid sequence but are in spatial proximity after folding of the GroEL polypeptide. Both the N- and C-terminal regions of the equatorial domain were implicated in virus binding.     

Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative proteins in its central channel through hydrophobic interactions and initiates productive folding in this space underneath bound co-chaperone, GroES, in the presence of ATP. The questions of where along the folding pathway a protein is recognized by GroEL, and how much structure is present in a bound substrate have remained subjects of discussion, with some experiments suggesting that bound forms are fully unfolded and others suggesting that bound species are partially structured. Here we have studied a substrate protein, human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), observing in stopped-flow fluorescence experiments that it can rapidly bind to GroEL at various stages of folding. We have also analyzed the structure of the GroEL-bound protein using hydrogen-deuterium exchange and NMR spectroscopy. The pattern and magnitude of amide proton protection indicate that the central parallel beta-sheet found in native DHFR is present in a moderately stable state in GroEL-bound DHFR. Considering that the strands are derived from distant parts of the primary structure, this suggests that a native-like global topology is also present. We conclude that significant native-like structure is present in protein-folding intermediates bound to GroEL.     

Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

We propose a mechanism for the role of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL in folding proteins. The principal assumptions of the mechanism are (i) that many unfolded proteins bind to GroEL because GroEL preferentially binds small unstructured regions of the substrate protein, (ii) that substrate protein within the cavity of GroEL folds by the same kinetic mechanism and rate processes as in bulk solution, (iii) that stable or transient complexes with GroEL during the folding process are defined by a kinetic partitioning between formation and dissociation of the complex and the rate of folding and unfolding of the protein, and (iv) that dissociation from the complex in early stages of folding may lead to aggregation but dissociation at a late stage leads to correct folding. The experimental conditions for refolding may play a role in defining the function of GroEL in the folding pathway. We propose that the role of GroES and MgATP, either binding or hydrolysis, is to regulate the association and dissociation processes rather than affecting the rate of folding.     

Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding

The chaperonins GroEL and GroES of Escherichia coli facilitate protein folding in an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent reaction cycle. The kinetic parameters for the formation and dissociation of GroEL-GroES complexes were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance. Association of GroES and subsequent ATP hydrolysis in the interacting GroEL toroid resulted in the formation of a stable GroEL:ADP:GroES complex. The complex dissociated as a result of ATP hydrolysis in the opposite GroEL toroid, without formation of a symmetrical GroEL:(GroES)2 intermediate. Dissociation was accelerated by the addition of unfolded polypeptide. Thus, the functional chaperonin unit is an asymmetrical GroEL:GroES complex, and substrate protein plays an active role in modulating the chaperonin reaction cycle.     

GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity

The chaperonin GroEL is an oligomeric double ring structure that, together with the cochaperonin GroES, assists protein folding. Biochemical analyses indicate that folding occurs in a cis ternary complex in which substrate is sequestered within the GroEL central cavity underneath GroES. Recently, however, studies of GroEL "minichaperones" containing only the apical substrate binding subdomain have questioned the functional importance of substrate encapsulation within GroEL-GroES complexes. Minichaperones were reported to assist folding despite the fact that they are monomeric and therefore cannot form a central cavity. Here we compare directly the folding activity of minichaperones with that of the full GroEL-GroES system. In agreement with earlier studies, minichaperones assist folding of some proteins. However, this effect is observed only under conditions where substantial spontaneous folding is also observed and is indistinguishable from that resulting from addition of the nonchaperone protein alpha-casein. By contrast, the full GroE system efficiently promotes folding of several substrates under conditions where essentially no spontaneous folding is observed. These data argue that the full GroEL folding activity requires the intact GroEL-GroES complex, and in light of previous studies, underscore the importance of substrate encapsulation for providing a folding environment distinct from the bulk solution.     

Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity

We have analysed the conformational states of barnase that are bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Line broadening in the NMR spectra of barnase in the presence of chaperone indicates binding of the native state of barnase to both GroEL and SecB, with a dissociation constant of > 3 x 10(-4) M for the GroEL-native barnase complex. GroEL and SecB catalyse the hydrogen-deuterium exchange of amide proteins of barnase that require global unfolding for exchange to occur, indicating that both chaperones bind to a fully unfolded state of barnase. Binding of the denatured state was also detected by a reversible lowering of the melting temperature of barnase in the presence of chaperone. The dissociation constant of the complex between denatured barnase and either chaperone is 5 x 10(-8) M. The chaperone-bound fully unfolded state is a minor conformation that would not be seen by direct observation under physiological conditions, as the folding intermediate of barnase is the most populated state in the complex. The rate-limiting step for exchange of buried amide protons of bound barnase is the unfolding of the folding intermediate, which is retarded > 2000-fold in the complex with GroEL. The reverse refolding step is retarded > 1000-fold by GroEL leading to an EX1 mechanism for exchange. In contrast, unfolding of native barnase is catalysed by > 1000-fold. Thus, molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB have the potential to act in vivo and in vitro as: (1) a folding/transport-scaffold to prevent aggregation of partially folded states by binding; (2) as an annealing-machine to generate continuous unfolding of misfolded states until a low-affinity state is formed; and (3) as an unfoldase to catalyse unfolding of the misfolded states.     

Chaperonin GroE-facilitated refolding of disulfide-bonded and reduced Taka-amylase A from Aspergillus oryzae

The refolding characteristics of Taka-amylase A (TAA) from Aspergillus oryzae in the presence of the chaperonin GroE were studied in terms of activity and fluorescence. Disulfide-bonded (intact) TAA and non-disulfide-bonded (reduced) TAA were unfolded in guanidine hydrochloride and refolded by dilution into buffer containing GroE. The intermediates of both intact and reduced enzymes were trapped by GroEL in the absence of nucleotide. Upon addition of nucleotides such as ATP, ADP, CTP or UTP, the intermediates were released from GroEL and recovery of activity was detected. In both cases, the refolding yields in the presence of GroEL and ATP were higher than spontaneous recoveries. Fluorescence studies of intrinsic tryptophan and a hydrophobic probe, 8-anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonate, suggested that the intermediates trapped by GroEL assumed conformations with different hydrophobic properties. The presence of protein disulfide isomerase or reduced and oxidized forms of glutathione in addition to GroE greatly enhanced the refolding reaction of reduced TAA. These findings suggest that GroE has an ability to recognize folding intermediates of TAA protein and facilitate refolding, regardless of the existence or absence of disulfide bonds in the protein.     

In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system

The quantitative contribution of chaperonin GroEL to protein folding in E. coli was analyzed. A diverse set of newly synthesized polypeptides, predominantly between 10-55 kDa, interacts with GroEL, accounting for 10%-15% of all cytoplasmic protein under normal growth conditions, and for 30% or more upon exposure to heat stress. Most proteins leave GroEL rapidly within 10-30 s. We distinguish three classes of substrate proteins: (I) proteins with a chaperonin-independent folding pathway; (II) proteins, more than 50% of total, with an intermediate chaperonin dependence for which normally only a small fraction transits GroEL; and (III) a set of highly chaperonin-dependent proteins, many of which dissociate slowly from GroEL and probably require sequestration of aggregation-sensitive intermediates within the GroEL cavity for successful folding.     

Activity patterns in Glossina longipennis: a field study using different sampling methods

Protein folding in the cell is controlled at the levels of translation and post-translational modification, depends on a number of conserved proteins known as chaperones, and is catalyzed by specific enzymes, such as protein disulfide isomerase and peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase. The chaperones stabilize folding intermediates and participate in assembly and disaggregation of supramolecular structures. Bacteriophage T4 is an especially convenient system for studying of protein folding mechanisms, since its genome encodes several virus-specific chaperones. In this review, the chaperones of phage T4 that take part in capsid formation (gp31 and gp40) and in folding and assembly of virion tail fibers (gp38, gp57A) have been considered. Protein encoded by gene 31 completely substitutes co-chaperonin GroES of the host cell in folding of the major capsid protein, gp23, aided by chaperonin GroEL. The product of gene 40, which is homologous to analogs of eukaryotic GroEL and peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase, participates in assembly of gp20 while the formation of procapsid connector. The chaperone encoded by gene 57A is essential for folding and oligomerization of both long and short phage tail fibers. gp38, together with gp57A, participates in the formation of the distal part of the long fibers. This protein seems to represent a principally new group of chaperones that change steric structure of folded polypeptide. One phage chaperone, fibritin, encoded by gene wac (whiskers antigen control) and taking part in assembly the subunits of the long tail fibers is a constituent of the virion. Fibritin is a convenient model for studying mechanisms of folding and oligomerization of fibrous proteins due to its labile triple-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coil structure.     

The chaperonin cycle cannot substitute for prolyl isomerase activity, but GroEL alone promotes productive folding of a cyclophilin-sensitive substrate to a cyclophilin-resistant form

The chaperonin GroEL and the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase cyclophilin are major representatives of two distinct cellular systems that help proteins to adopt their native three-dimensional structure: molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. Little is known about whether and how these proteins cooperate in protein folding. In this study, we have examined the action of GroEL and cyclophilin on a substrate protein in two distinct prolyl isomerization states. Our results indicate that: (i) GroEL binds the same substrate in different prolyl isomerization states. (ii) GroEL-ES does not promote prolyl isomerizations, but even retards isomerizations. (iii) Cyclophilin cannot promote the correct isomerization of prolyl bonds of a GroEL-bound substrate, but acts sequentially after release of the substrate from GroEL. (iv) A denatured substrate with all-native prolyl bonds is delayed in folding by cyclophilin due to isomerization to non-native prolyl bonds; a substrate that has proceeded in folding beyond a stage where it can be bound by GroEL is still sensitive to cyclophilin. (v) If a denatured cyclophilin-sensitive substrate is first bound to GroEL, however, productive folding to a cyclophilin-resistant form can be promoted, even without GroES. We conclude that GroEL and cyclophilin act sequentially and exert complementary functions in protein folding.     

EPR mapping of interactions between spin-labeled variants of human carbonic anhydrase II and GroEL: evidence for increased flexibility of the hydrophobic core by the interaction

Human carbonic anhydrase II (HCA II) interacts weakly with GroEL at room temperature. To further investigate this interaction we used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy to study HCA II cysteine mutants spin-labeled at selected positions. From our results it is evident that protein-protein interactions can be specifically mapped by site-directed spin-labeling and EPR measurements. HCA II needs to be unfolded to about the same extent as a GuHCl-induced molten-globule intermediate of the enzyme to interact with GroEL. The interaction with GroEL includes interactions with outer parts of the HCA II molecule, such as peripheral beta-strands and the N-terminal domain, which have previously been shown to be rather unstable. As a result of the interaction, the rigid and compact hydrophobic core exhibits higher flexibility than in the molten globule, which is likely to facilitate rearrangements of misfolded structure during the folding process. The degree of binding to GroEL and accompanying inactivation of the enzyme depend on the stability of the HCA II variant, and nonspecific hydrophobic interactions appear to be most important in stabilizing the GroEL-substrate complex.     

Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction

Mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) folds more rapidly in the presence of GroEL, GroES and ATP than it does unassisted. The increase in folding rate as a function of the concentration of GroEL-ES reaches a maximum at a stoichiometry which is approximately equimolar (mMDH subunits:GroEL oligomer) and with an apparent dissociation constant K' for the GroE acceptor state of at least 1 x 10(-8) M. However, even at chaperonin concentrations which are 4000 x K', i.e. at negligible concentrations of free mMDH, the observed folding rate of the substrate remains at its optimum, showing not only that folding occurs in the chaperonin-mMDH complex but also that this rate is uninhibited by any interactions with sites on GroEL. Despite the ability of mMDH to fold on the chaperonin, trapping experiments show that its dwell time on the complex is only 20 seconds. This correlates with both the rate of ATP turnover and the dwell time of GroES on the complex and is only approximately 5% of the time taken for the substrate to commit to the folded state. The results imply that ATP drives the chaperonin complex through a cycle of three functional states: (1) an acceptor complex in which the unfolded substrate is bound tightly; (2) an encapsulation state in which it is sequestered but direct protein-protein contact is lost so that folding can proceed unhindered; and (3) an ejector state which forces dissociation of the substrate whether folded or not.     

The ins and outs of a molecular chaperone machine

Genetic and biochemical work has highlighted the biological importance of the GroEL/GroES (Hsp60/Hsp10; cpn60/cpn10) chaperone machine in protein folding. GroEL's donut-shaped structure has attracted the attention of structural biologists because of its elegance as well as the secrets (substrates) it can hide. The recent determination of the GroES and GroEL/GroES structures provides a glimpse of their plasticity, revealing dramatic conformational changes that point to an elaborate mechanism, coupling ATP hydrolysis to substrate release by GroEL.     

Recognition of partially-folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase by GroEL. Steady and time-dependent emission anisotropy measurements

The binding of partially-folded mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase (mMDH) to GroEL was assessed by steady and nanosecond emission spectroscopy. Partially-folded intermediates of mMDH show significant residual secondary structure when examined by CD spectroscopy in the far UV. They bind the extrinsic fluorescent probe ANS and the protein-ANS complexes display a rotational correlation time of 19 ns. Similar rotational correlation time (phi = 18.6 ns) was determined for partially-folded species tagged with anthraniloyl. GroEL recognizes partially-folded species with a K(D) approximately 60 nM. The rotational correlation time of the complex, i.e., GroEL-mMDH-ANT, approaches a value of 280 ns in the absence of ATP. Reactivation of mMDH-ANT by addition of GroEL and ATP brings about a significant decrease in the observed rotational correlation time. The results indicate that partially-folded malate dehydrogenase is rigidly trapped by GroEL in the absence of ATP, whereas addition of ATP facilitates reactivation and release of folded conformations endowed with catalytic activity.     

MgATP binding to the nucleotide-binding domains of the eukaryotic cytoplasmic chaperonin induces conformational changes in the putative substrate-binding domains

The eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins are large heterooligomeric complexes with a cylindrical shape, resembling that of the homooligomeric bacterial counterpart, GroEL. In analogy to GroEL, changes in shape of the cytosolic chaperonin have been detected in the presence of MgATP using electron microscopy but, in contrast to the nucleotide-induced conformational changes in GroEL, no details are available about the specific nature of these changes. The present study identifies the structural regions of the cytosolic chaperonin that undergo conformational changes when MgATP binds to the nucleotide binding domains. It is shown that limited proteolysis with trypsin in the absence of MgATP cleaves each of the eight subunits approximately in half, generating two fragments of approximately 30 kDa. Using mass spectrometry (MS) and N-terminal sequence analysis, the cleavage is found to occur in a narrow span of the amino acid sequence, corresponding to the peptide binding regions of GroEL and to the helical protrusion, recently identified in the structure of the substrate binding domain of the archeal group II chaperonin. This proteolytic cleavage is prevented by MgATP but not by ATP in the absence of magnesium, ATP analogs (MgATPyS and MgAMP-PNP) or MgADP. These results suggest that, in analogy to GroEL, binding of MgATP to the nucleotide binding domains of the cytosolic chaperonin induces long range conformational changes in the polypeptide binding domains. It is postulated that despite their different subunit composition and substrate specificity, group I and group II chaperonins may share similar, functionally-important, conformational changes. Additional conformational changes are likely to involve a flexible helix-loop-helix motif, which is characteristic for all group II chaperonins.     

Trigger factor associates with GroEL in vivo and promotes its binding to certain polypeptides

Trigger factor (TF) is a putative molecular chaperone recently found to function together with GroEL in the degradation of the fusion protein, CRAG. TF overproduction enhanced the ability of GroEL to form complexes with CRAG, as well as fetuin or histone. To define further this effect on GroEL binding, affinity columns containing a variety of denatured proteins were used. When cell extracts were applied onto a fetuin column, both TF and GroEL bound but not GroES. Upon ATP addition, TF and GroEL were eluted together and remained tightly associated (even in presence of GroES) in complexes containing one TF per GroEL 14-mer. Overproduction of TF enhanced the capacity of GroEL to bind to many denatured proteins. Moreover, GroEL-TF complexes isolated from such cells showed much greater binding capacity than GroEL from TF-deficient cells. Furthermore, the addition of pure TF to pure GroEL also enhanced markedly its binding capacity. The affinity of GroEL for CRAG also rises during heat shock due to GroEL phosphorylation. TF expression, however, did not promote GroEL phosphorylation. Moreover, heat shock and TF overproduction affected GroEL binding to other denatured polypeptides in distinct ways; only TF promoted binding to certain polypeptides, whereas only phosphorylation increased binding to others. Thus, association with TF and phosphorylation are independent regulators of GroEL function. This enhanced affinity of TF-GroEL complexes for unfolded proteins may also be important in protein folding, because TF has prolyl isomerase activity and associates with nascent polypeptides.