Anatomic considerations of anterior transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability

STUDY DESIGN: Anatomic parameters of C1 and C2 were measured in 30 dried human cervical spines. Anterior transarticular C1-C2 screws were placed in 15 cadaveric spines. OBJECTIVE: To provide anatomic data for anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or C1-C2 screw and plate fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A posterior approach to fixation in the atlantoaxial joint has been well described. Damage to the vertebral artery is documented as a rare complication of posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. An anterior surgical approach to exposing the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone graft recently has been developed. No anatomic information regarding the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 is available in the literature. METHODS: Direct measurements using digital calipers and a goniometer were taken from 30 pairs of dried human C1 and C2 vertebrae. The anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw insertion point is at the junction of the lateral edge of the C2 vertebral body to 4 mm above the inferior edge of the C2 anterior arch. The parameters related to anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw fixation or screw and plate fixation between the C1 lateral mass and the C2 vertebral body were measured. Fifteen embalmed cadavers were used for anterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement. Longer screws (30-40 mm) were used to detect whether the screw tips violated the upper cervical canal or vertebral arteries. RESULTS: In the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw placement, lateral angulation of the screw placement relative to sagittal plane ranged from 4.8 +/- 1.8 degrees to 25.3 +/- 2.6 degrees. The posterior angulation of the screw placement relative to the coronal plane ranged from 12.8 +/- 3.1 degrees to 22.6 +/- 3.2 degrees. The length of the medial screw path ranged from 14.7 +/- 1.5 mm to 25.4 +/- 2.8 mm. In the anterior screw and plate fixation, the anteroposterior diameter of the inferior facet articular surface ranged from 16.2 +/- 1.6 mm to 17.1 +/- 1.8 mm. The anteroposterior diameter of the C2 vertebral body ranged from 9.3 +/- 1 mm to 16.2 +/- 1.8 mm. The anterior prevascular retropharyngeal approach appropriately exposed the atlantoaxial joint for anterior transarticular C1-C2 screw placement. No screws violated the vertebral artery and cervical canal. CONCLUSIONS: An anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw 15-25 mm long can be inserted with a lateral angulation of 5-25 degrees relative to the sagittal plane and a posterior angulation of 10-25 degrees relative to the coronal plane. Additionally, in C1-C2 anterior plate fixation screws 15 mm long could be anchored in the inferior facet of the C1, and screws 9-15 mm long could be anchored in the C2 vertebral body.     

Accuracy of using computed tomography to identify pedicle screw placement in cadaveric human lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Utility of using computed tomography to predict pedicle screw misplacement. OBJECTIVE: This study defines the sensitivity and specificity of predicting pedicle screw placement by experienced clinicians using a CT scan image. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical and research settings, the method most commonly used to evaluate pedicle screws placement has been computed tomography. However, no current literature describes the accuracy of this method of evaluating screw placement. METHOD: Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy pedicle screws of identical size were placed in six cadaveric human lumbar spine. Wide laminectomy was performed to allow complete visualization of the pedicles. Three consecutive lumbar levels were instrumented in each spine, giving 36 pedicle screw placements to identify. The instrumented spines were imaged, and four orthopaedic spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist were asked to read the images to identify the accuracy of screw placement within the pedicles. RESULTS: The sensitivity rate of identifying a misplaced screw was 67 +/- 6% for cobalt-chrome screws compared with 86 +/- 5% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). The specificity rates of radiographic diagnosis of misplaced pedicle screws were 66 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws and 88 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Similarly, a statistically significant difference was found in the sensitivity rates of identifying screws placed correctly in the pedicle: 70 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws versus 89 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Overall accuracy rates were 68 +/- 7% for cobalt chrome screws versus 87 +/- 3% for titanium screws (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Reliance on the computed tomography scan data alone in determining accuracy of pedicle screws can lead to inaccuracies in both clinical and research conditions.     

The reliability of the lateral radiograph in determination of the optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw length

STUDY DESIGN: This study assessed the value of using lateral radiographs in evaluating the optimal screw length in transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation. OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the lateral radiograph in determining the optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw length. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transarticular C1-C2 screw placement is usually performed using anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy. A lateral fluoroscopic image is valuable when directing screws in the sagittal plane, but its exact role in determining screw length has not been investigated. METHODS: Eight cervical spine specimens were used in this study. Screw placements were performed in each specimen, fixed in the exact lateral position and under direct visualization. After each placement, a lateral radiograph was taken. The odontoid process was divided into three equal portions. Another portion anterior to the odontoid process was called the anterior tubercle region. The number of screw tips appearing in each portion on the radiograph was then recorded for each placement. In addition, 30 C1 specimens were measured to evaluate the anterior part of C1. RESULTS: The results showed that 12.5% of the screws placed 2 mm short of reaching the ventral cortex and 0 mm overpenetrating the ventral cortex of the lateral mass of C1 projected in the radiograph on the anterior tubercle region, 37.5% on the anterior region of the odontoid process, and 50% on the middle region of the odontoid process. Twenty-five percent of the screws that were placed to overpenetrate, by 2 or 4 mm, the ventral cortex of the lateral mass of C1 were projected on the anterior tubercle region in the radiograph, and 50% and 62.5% were projected on the anterior region of the odontoid process, respectively. The mean vertical distance between the anteriormost point of the anterior tubercle of the anterior ring and the middle of the ventral cortex of the lateral in all specimens was 5.6 +/- 1 mm, and the mean transverse angle of the anterior ring relative to the frontal plane was 21.1 +/- 3.5 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: This results in this study indicate that a lateral radiograph may not be reliable in determining the optimal screw length, although it is valuable in directing accurate screw angle in the sagittal plane. Preoperative computed tomographic evaluation of the C1-C2 region may be helpful in estimating the location of the screw tip on the lateral radiograph during surgery.     

In vitro simulation. Early results of stereotaxy for pedicle screw placement

STUDY DESIGN: Frameless stereotaxy with doppler ultrasound and three dimensional computer model registration is assessed in vitro for pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To identify feasibility of pedicle screw navigation and placement using this technology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Inaccurate pedicle screw placement can lead to neurovascular injury or suboptimal fixation. Present techniques in pedicle screw placement involve only confirmation of hole orientation. METHOD: Forty-four pedicle screws were placed in lumbosacral models and cadaver specimens. Accuracy was assessed with a computed tomography scan and vertebral cross sectioning. RESULTS: All screws were intrapedicular. Accuracy of anterior cortical fixation was 1.5 mm, with a range of 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: In vitro frameless stereotaxy is accurate for pedicle screw placement. This technology adds a component of navigation to pedicle screw placement.     

Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement

STUDY DESIGN: Pedicle screws were pulled out of human cadaveric vertebrae before and after augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate or in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement. The fixation strength of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with that of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a new in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement might be suitable for augmenting the fixation of pedicle screws. The principle objective was to compare the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement with the pull-out behavior of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation was chosen as the standard because of its current clinical use. Five types of screws were tested to determine whether screw design had an effect on the efficacy of augmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although many factors affect the pull-out resistance of pedicle screws, a key determinant of their performance is the strength of their attachment to the spine. In elderly, osteopenic patients, the screw-bone interface is especially at risk for stripping during insertion or pull-out after surgery. In these patients, polymethylmethacrylate has been used to augment pedicle screw fixation, although its use is not without risk. In situ-setting calcium phosphate cements may provide an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate in this application. Like polymethylmethacrylate, calcium phosphate cements can be injected into the prepared screw hole. They have the added advantage of being resorbed and replaced during healing and normal bone remodeling. METHODS: Thirty human lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) were implanted bilaterally with one of five types of pedicle screws (n = 6 for each screw type). The screws were pulled out 3.0 mm at 0.25 mm/sec with a servohydraulic materials testing machine. The 3.0-mm pull-out distance, which was slightly longer than one thread pitch, was designed to strip the screw-bone interface but to leave the pedicle otherwise intact. After the initial testing, the screws in each vertebrae were removed, and the screw tracks were filled with 2.0 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (one side) or calcium phosphate cement (contralateral side). After augmentation, the screws were reinserted, and the cements were allowed to harden for 24 hours. Postaugmentation testing followed the protocols for preaugmentation testing, and the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. RESULTS: Mechanically, calcium phosphate cement compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate for augmenting pedicle screws. Both restored the strength of the screw-bone interface: across all screw types, the average increase in pull-out strength was 147% with polymethylmethacrylate augmentation and 102% with calcium phosphate cement. There were no significant differences because of screw type with either type of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement investigated in this study compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate in a single-cycle, pull-out test of augmented pedicle screws in senile trabecular bone. With further evaluation, this cement may offer an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for the enhancement of pedicle screw fixation clinically.     

Anterior transpedicular fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Experimental verification using a new direction finder

Currently, no anterior spinal implant provides a strong bone-screw interface because of the cancellous characteristics of the vertebral body. A more secure anchorage could be obtained by anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Four hundred transpedicular screws located between T7 and L5 were placed using the newly developed direction finder. Measurements were obtained directly from radiographs of the cadaveric specimens. In 10 cases (2.5%), the screws crossed the medial pedicle border, but never by more than 1.4 mm. A lateral protrusion was noted in another 41 screws (10%), with no protrusion greater than 2.2 mm. Encroachments beyond the superior or inferior border were not observed. The mean angle of the screws at each level measured between 7 and 19 in the transverse plane and between 2 and 4.5 in the sagittal plane. This technique should be reserved for vertebrae without significant arthritic changes. The rare screw with minimal infraction through the medial or lateral pedicle wall should not cause any vascular or neural compromise. The anterior transpedicular screw technique appeared relatively safe (88%) and encouraged the development of the new plate system for anterior spinal stabilization.     

Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the effect of change in screw dimensions and hole augmentation in pedicle screw revisions, the insertional torque was determined, and results were compared with those in control specimens in an in vitro study using cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the best method of salvage for failed pedicle screws, by evaluating the insertional torque after placing a larger diameter or longer screw into a stripped hole. Use of a shim and use of larger and longer screws were also investigated. Finally, the effect on insertional torque of simply removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole was investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effects of using bigger or longer screws and shims to salvage failed pedicles have been studied. The interaction between how much larger, how much longer, and inserting with or without shims, has not been well studied. Optimizing reinsertional torque through the use of bigger screws risks exceeding the pedicle capacity. Using longer screws risks violation of the anterior vertebral body, thereby placing the great vessels and viscera at risk. By knowing the relative contribution of increase in length and diameter, the surgeon can optimize the risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: Eight cadaveric spines from T10 to S1 were harvested. The specimens underwent radiographic screening and bone densitometry. A modified Latin square randomization was designed to evaluate the screw diameters and lengths. Each pedicle was its own control. A 35- x 6.5-mm screw was used as a control. Test screws were placed after pedicle screw hole failure was achieved and documented by stripping. For the test screws, the diameters were increased by 1 mm and 2 mm, the lengths were increased by 5 mm and 10 mm. Shims were added randomly. The peak insertional torque was measured for each control screw and test screw placement. In addition, during each screw placement, the screw was removed and replaced to determine the effect. RESULTS: Insertional torque, after the pedicle screw is removed and replaced in the same hole, was decreased by 34% (P < 0.000005). Increasing the diameter of the salvage screw by 2 mm caused the insertional torque to be increased by 8.4% of the original. Increasing the length of the screw did not improve the salvage screw insertional torque. There was an interaction effect for the 1-mm increase in diameter and the increase in length. At this diameter, increasing the length had a significant effect (P = 0.009) on the salvage torque. Using a shim created no improvement in salvage insertional torque (P = 0.77). There was a poor linear correlation between torque and bone mineral density (r = 0.18) in these osteoporotic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole substantially decreases its mechanical fixation. For pedicle salvage, increasing the diameter causes the greatest restoration of strength. Shims had no effect in pedicle salvage in osteoporotic specimens.     

Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques

Clinical evaluation of a computer assisted spine surgical system is presented. Eighty pedicle screws were inserted using computer assisted technology in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae for treatment of different types of disorders including fractures, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. Fifty-two patients with severe fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudoarthrosis of T10 to L5 were treated using a computer assisted technique on 1/2 the patients and performing the screw insertion manually for the other 1/2. At the same time, 28 pedicle screws were inserted in T12 to L4 vertebrae for scoliosis with the help of the computer assisted technique. Surgery was followed in all cases (66 vertebrae; 132 pedicle screws) by postoperative radiographs and computed tomographic examination, on which measurements of screw position relative to pedicle position could be done. For fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudarthrosis, comparison between the two groups showed that four screws in 52 (8%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with computer assisted technique whereas 22 screws in 52 (42%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with manual insertion. In patients with scoliosis, four screws in 28 (14%) vertebrae had incorrect placement. In all of the patients (132 pedicle screws) there were no neurologic complications. These results show that a computer assisted technique is much more accurate and safe than manual insertion.     

Non-union of the scaphoid. Treatment with cannulated screws compared with treatment with Herbert screws

We retrospectively reviewed the results for thirty-four patients in whom a non-union of the scaphoid had been treated with bone-grafting and internal fixation with use of one of two types of screws as well as the temporary placement of Kirschner wires parallel to the screw to prevent rotation. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 contained sixteen patients who had been managed with a Herbert screw from 1986 through 1989 and Group 2, eighteen patients who had been managed with a 3.5-millimeter cannulated AO/ASIF screw from 1990 through 1992. There were no clinical or radiographic differences between the two groups. The time to union, confirmed with tomography, was 7.6 +/- 3.6 months for Group 1 and 3.6 +/- 1.2 months for Group 2. This difference was significant (p < 0.01). Both screws significantly improved the alignment of the scaphoid and decreased carpal collapse (p < 0.05). Regardless of the type of screw used, the time to union was significantly shorter when the screw had been placed in the central one-third of the scaphoid (p < 0.05). Seventeen of the eighteen cannulated screws had been placed centrally, compared with seven of the sixteen Herbert screws (p < 0.01).     

Transcutaneous or transconjunctival peribulbar anesthesia?

The complications of 648 consecutively inserted Universal AO pedicle screws (140 in the thoracic spine and 508 in the lumbar spine) performed by one surgical team to treat 91 patients with spinal problems, were reviewed. The spinal pathology consisted of: scoliosis (34 patients), degenerative lower lumbar spinal disease (25 patients), neoplastic spinal disease (11 patients), thoracic kyphosis (8 patients), spinal fractures (7 patients), lumbo-sacral spondylolisthesis (3 patients), and osteomyelitis (3 patients). Intraoperative complications were: screw misplacement (n = 3), nerve root impingement (n = 1), cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 2) and pedicle fracture (n = 2). Postoperative complications were; deep wound infection (n = 4), screw loosening (n = 2) and rod-screw disconnection (n = 1). The conclusion was that pedicle screw fixation has an acceptable complication rate and neurological injury during this procedure is unlikely.     

Orthofix external fixation of distal radius fractures: complications associated with screw size

We did a retrospective analysis of 28 patients who were treated with the Orthofix external fixation system for complex fractures of the distal radius to study complications associated with screw size. The 14 patients in group 1 had a 4.5/3.5-mm tapered screw placed in the metacarpal bone; the 14 patients in group 2 had a 3.5/3.3-mm tapered screw placed in the metacarpal bone. Both groups had 4.5/3.5-mm tapered screws placed in the radius. Two patients in group 1 had metacarpal pin tract infections; no patients in group 2 had a distal pin tract infection. Two patients in group 1 had a fracture of the metacarpal; only one patient in group 2 had a fracture of the metacarpal. In both groups two patients had proximal pin tract infections at the radius screw fixation site. There was no screw breakage in either group. The unique design of the tapered Orthofix screw allows it to be removed almost painlessly in the clinic. At installation in the operating room, however, the surgeon must remember not to back the threaded pin out for fine adjustment of bony penetration. Any reverse excursion of the threaded shaft will loosen the tapered screw and cause early failure of the fixation. We no longer use the 4.5/3.5-mm screw when managing wrist fractures with the Orthofix external fixation system. It is now our policy to use the 3.5/3.3-mm screw for fixation of the Orthofix external frame to both the metacarpal bone and the radius.     

Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro assessment of accuracy and reliability of frameless stereotaxis for insertion of pedicle screws in human cadaveric lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To assess a new method of targeting and placing pedicle screws in a human cadaver study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation is common. Complications may occur from improper placement of screws. Even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons, improper placement can occur in 5.2% of pedicles instrumented. Development of computer-guided methods of pedicle screw insertion may decrease this complication rate. METHODS: The technique used preoperative computed tomography scans together with a commercial neurosurgical navigational computer system to assist in placing guidewires in the pedicles. A section of human cadaver spine was first scanned and the data transferred to the workstation. The image data set and physical specimen were then registered by using an instrumented articulated arm to identify selected points on the specimen and randomly sample surface points. Eight highly repeatable locations on each vertebral body were found to be suitable for registration, but better overall accuracy was obtained when surface matching was used in combination with these points. Under guidance of image on the computer, Kirschner wires were inserted into the pedicles of four vertebral bodies. The spine was rescanned, and the planned and resulting positions of the wires compared. RESULTS: The average distance between the planned and resulting wire entry point was 1.2 mm, with an average difference in planned and resulting trajectories of 6.0 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided pedicle screw instrumentation is feasible. Further technical points require clarification before widespread use is possible.     

Posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial arthrodesis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes associated with C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 121 patients treated with posterior C1-C2 transarticular screws and wired posterior C1-C2 autologous bone struts were evaluated prospectively. Atlantoaxial instability was caused by rheumatoid arthritis in 48 patients, C1 or C2 fractures in 45, transverse ligament disruption in 11, os odontoideum in 9, tumors in 6, and infection in 2. RESULTS: Altogether, 226 screws were placed under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral C1-C2 screws were placed in 105 patients; each of 16 patients had only one screw placed because of an anomalous vertebral artery (n = 13) or other pathological abnormality. Postoperatively, each patient underwent radiography and computed tomography to assess the position of the screw and healing. Most screws (221 screws, 98%) were positioned satisfactorily. Five screws were malpositioned (2%), but none were associated with clinical sequelae. Four malpositioned screws were reoperated on (one was repositioned, and three were removed). No patients had neurological complications, strokes, or transient ischemic attacks. Long-term follow-up (mean, 22 mo) of 114 patients demonstrated a 98% fusion rate. Two nonunions (2%) required occipitocervical fixation. In comparison, our C1-C2 fixations with wires and autograft (n = 74) had an 86% union rate. CONCLUSION: Rigidly fixating C1-C2 instability with transarticular screws was associated with a significantly higher fusion rate than that achieved using wired grafts alone. The risk of screw malpositioning and catastrophic vascular or neural injury is small and can be minimized by assessing the position of the foramen transversaria on preoperative computed tomographic scans and by using intraoperative fluoroscopy and frameless stereotaxy to guide the screw trajectory.     

The vertebral body depths of the cervical spine and its relation to anterior plate-screw fixation

STUDY DESIGN: A study was performed to measure the vertebral body depths in different locations from C2 to C7. OBJECTIVES: To measure the vertebral body depths in 10 linear dimension from C2 to C7. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine has been the common surgical procedure for management of multilevel degenerative disc disease and fracture dislocation. However, injury to the spinal cord during drill or screw placement is the most feared complication of this procedure. It is beneficial for one to have a knowledge of the vertebral body depths in different locations of the vertebral body before anterior cervical plating. METHODS: Twenty-seven cervical spines from C2 to C7 were evaluated directly for this study. Anatomic evaluation of the vertebral body included the anteroposterior midline sagittal depth and the anteroposterior parasagittal depth 5 mm lateral to midline on the superior and inferior endplates, as well as on the middle body. Measurements also were made of anteroposterior parasagittal vertebral depth with both medial and lateral inclination of 10 degrees, with respect to the parasagittal plane of the vertebral body. RESULTS: In general, the measurements of male specimens were larger than those of female specimens. Significant differences were noted at 21 measurements over C3 through C7. The mean depths of the superior endplate for all male and female specimens increased consistently from C3 to C7. The mean depths of the inferior endplate varied but generally increased from C2 to C6, then decreased to C7. The mean sagittal and parasagittal middle vertebral body depths were both 14 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This information, in conjunction with preoperative computed tomographic evaluation, may be helpful in determining proper screw length during anterior plating of the cervical spine.     

Omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention-management of cardiovascular disease

Eight cervical spines were used to evaluate the relation of the screw tip to the nerve root in the intervertebral foramen. The specimens were divided into two groups: (a) lateral placement without contact with the nerve root, and (b) lateral placement with penetration of the nerve root. Six screws were used for each specimen. After screw placement, oblique radiographs and axial computed tomography (CT) scans were taken. The results on oblique radiographs showed that 23 (95.8%) of 24 screws without contact with the nerve root were found in the upper zone or the junction between the upper and lower zones of the intervertebral foramen. Twenty (83.3%) of 24 screws with penetration of the nerve root were located in the junction between the lower zone of the intervertebral foramen and the pedicle zone. No definite diagnosis of screw penetration of the nerve root could be made on axial CT scans, although scans can show that the screw is violating the foramen. Whether or not a screw violating the intertransverse foramen and affects the nerve root depends on its position on the oblique radiograph. It may be not necessary to remove or change the screw immediately if a longer screw is found in the upper portion of the intervertebral foramen on the oblique view and angled laterally on axial CT scan in a patient without radicular symptoms.     

Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. A 5-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective study, the long-term results of translaminar facet screw fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine are reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical results, fusion rates and complications of this posterior fusion technique in various conditions of the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine is one of the possible methods to relieve pain and eliminate instability in degenerative conditions. Data in the literature support the use of internal fixation to optimize the rate of fusion. METHODS: Posterior lumbar and lumbosacral fixation with translaminar screws and fusion in 173 patients with degenerative changes with or without compressive syndromes including failed back syndromes, monosegmental hypermobilities, and posttraumatic conditions were investigated. Fixation and fusion with translaminar screws was performed in 57% monosegmentally, in 40% across two segments and in 2% over three segments. Decompressive surgery was performed in addition in 52% and nucleotomy in 30% of the cases. Clinical and radiologic assessment with flexion/extension x-rays was performed in 145 (83%) patients by two independent orthopedic surgeons. After an average follow-up of 68 months (range, 52-83). RESULTS: Ninety-four percent of the patients showed solid bony fusion in the radiologic follow-up. Loosening of the screws was noted in 3%, and two screws were broken without apparent motion on the functional x-rays. Pain scores decreased from 7.6 before surgery to 2.9 after surgery on a 10-point pain scale. The results were further analyzed according to Stauffer and Coventry with 99 good results, 70 satisfactory results, and 4 bad results. CONCLUSIONS: Translaminar screw fixation offers an immediate postoperative stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine and enhances fusion. In the present series no neurologic complications were noted. It represents a useful and inexpensive technique for short segment fusion of the nontraumatic lumbar and lumbosacral spine.     

Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical testing with human cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies was used to determine the utility of an injectable carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement for improving the structural performance of pedicle screws subjected to axial pull-out or transverse cyclic loading. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether augmentation with a carbonated apatite cement can enhance pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The beneficial effects of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on pedicle screw pull-out strength have been demonstrated. Cancellous bone cement, however, may provide an attractive alternative in this application, as it is remodelable, biocompatible, and nonexothermic. METHODS: Forty-three cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented with pedicle screws. In 20 of these specimens, axial pull-out strength was compared between the control screws and those augmented with cancellous bone cement. In the remaining 23 specimens, the screws were loaded in the superior-inferior direction with a peak displacement of +/- 1 mm at a frequency of 3 Hz for 5000 cycles. Three parameters were calculated from the force-versus-time data: 1) the energy dissipated, 2) the peak force at the start of the test, and 3) the peak force at the end of 5000 cycles. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the augmented pedicles averaged 68% greater than that of the control side. In response to cyclic loading, all measures of bio-mechanical performance improved 30-63%. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that augmentation with this carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement can enhance immediate screw fixation.     

Spinal instrumentation with a low complication rate

BACKGROUND: Spinal instrumentation has become an increasing part of the armamentarium of neurosurgery and neurosurgical training. For noncontroversial indications for spine fusion the arthrodesis rate seems to be better. For both noncontroversial and controversial indications, the reported complication rate with spinal instrumentation tends to be greater than that with noninstrumented spine surgeries. These reported complications include a 2-3% neurologic injury rate, 3-45% reoperation rate for implant failure, and inflection rates of 5-10%. Therefore, we report on 299 cases that have undergone spinal instrumentation placed exclusively by neurosurgeons with a very low complication rate. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine consecutive spinal instrumentation cases performed exclusively by neurosurgeons at Indiana University Medical Center were analyzed for complications related to spinal instrumentation. The spinal instrumentation placed consisted of 195 anterior cervical locking plates, 22 cases of posterior cervical instrumentation, 9 cases of combined anterior locking plates with posterior cervical instrumentation, 14 anterior thoracolumbar plates, 51 posterior thoraco-lumbar instrumentation cases, and 8 combined anterior/posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation cases. RESULTS: The mean follow-up is 40 months (6-95). There was one perioperative death unrelated to the spinal instrumentation. There were no neurologic injuries and there has been no hardware infection to date. There were two dural tears, three superficial wound infections, and three minor wound breakdowns successfully treated. Hardware complications included three cervical plate/screw extrusions reoperated, one cervical plate fracture reoperated, one posterior cervical screw backout not reoperated, one case of broken pedicle screw not reoperated, one vertebral body failure not reoperated, and one posterior rod case reoperated for excessive rod length and protrusion. The overall complication rate attributable to placement of spinal instrumentation was 10/299 (3%) with a reoperation rate of 2%. The arthrodesis rate was 298/299 (99%). CONCLUSION: The complication rate for using spinal instrumentation can be less than previously reported. Lessons learned and discussed should reduce the rate even more. Spinal instrumentation is a safe and useful adjunct to fusion in treating degenerative, traumatic, infectious, and neoplastic diseases of the spine.     

Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 223 consecutive cases (1986-1996) from one institution where 759 thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws were used in the treatment of various pediatric spinal disorders in patients less than 18 years of age. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of short- and long-term (> 2 years follow-up) complications in this group of patients-specifically, complications related to instrumentation and those directly attributable to pedicle screws in these pediatric patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although much has been written regarding the use of pedicle screws in the adult population, no published study has examined complication rates with regard to thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws placed for pediatric spinal disorders. METHODS: A retrospective review of 223 consecutive cases involving 759 pedicle screws placed for a variety of pediatric spinal disorders was performed. Complications were divided into short term and long term (> 2 years follow-up) and into those relating to instrumentation and those relating to pedicle screws specifically. RESULTS: Short-term complication occurred in 5 patients (2.2%) for a total of 17 screws ultimately removed. Only two of these patients had screws removed for lumbar radicular complaints. No residual sequellae resulted. No long-term (> 2 years postoperative) complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Low short- and long-term complication rates specific for pediatric pedicle screws suggests that for properly trained spinal surgeons, pedicle screws fixation in the pediatric population can be performed safely to treat a variety of spinal disorders.     

Safety and accuracy of transarticular screw fixation C1-C2 using an aiming device. An anatomic study

STUDY DESIGN: In this anatomic study, the safety and accuracy of C1-C2 transarticular screw placement was tested in a normal anatomic situation in cadaver specimens using a specially designed aiming device. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and accuracy of transarticular screw placement using the technique described by Magerl and a specially designed aiming device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to posterior C1-C2 wiring techniques. Several clinical series have been reported in the literature. However, no previous study assessing the accuracy or safety of this technique has been published. Structures at risk are the vertebral arteries, spinal canal, and the occiput-C1 joint. METHODS: Five frozen human cadaveric specimens were thawed and instrumented with 10 C1-C2 transarticular screws, according to the technique described by Magerl but using a specially designed aiming device described by the senior author (Jeanneret). After screw placement, the accuracy of screw positioning and the distance of the screws from the spinal canal, vertebral arteries, and atlanto-occipital joint were determined by anatomic dissection and radiographic analysis. RESULTS: The structure at greatest risk was the atlanto-occipital joint, with one screw found to be damaging the joint. Vertebral artery or spinal canal penetration was not observed in any of the specimens. Screw length averaged 45 mm and, with proper length, the screw tip was found to be located approximately 7.5 mm behind the anterior tubercle of C1 on lateral radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: This anatomic study demonstrates that C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation can be performed safely in a normal anatomic situation by surgeons who are familiar with the pertinent anatomy. The aiming device allowed safe instrumentation in all patients. In case of an irregular anatomic situation (e.g., congenital abnormalities or trauma), computed tomographic scan with sagittal reconstruction is recommended-in particular, to obtain information about the course of the vertebral artery.