Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an integrated biomass gasification combined cycle (IBGCC) with CO2 removal

Based on the results of previous studies, the efficiency of a Brayton/Hirn combined cycle fuelled with a clean syngas produced by means of biomass gasification and equipped with CO₂ removal by chemical absorption reached 33.94%, considering also the separate CO₂ compression process. The specific CO₂ emission of the power plant was 178 kg/MW h. In comparison with values previously found for an integrated coal gasification combined cycle (ICGCC) with upstream CO₂ chemical absorption (38–39% efficiency, 130 kg/MW h specific CO₂ emissions), this configuration seems to be attractive because of the possibility of operating with a simplified scheme and because of the possibility of using biomass in a more efficient way with respect to conventional systems. In this paper, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted with presenting the results on the basis of the Eco-Indicator 95 impact assessment methodology. Further, a comparison with the results previously obtained for the LCA of the ICGCC was performed in order to highlight the environmental impact of biomass production with fossil fuels utilisation. The LCA shows the important environmental advantages of biomass utilisation in terms of reduction of both greenhouse gas emissions and natural resource depletion, although an improved impact assessment methodology may better highlight the advantages due to the biomass utilisation.     

Effects of supplementary biomass firing on the performance of combined cycle power generation: A comparison between NGCC and IGCC plants

In the present work, effects of biomass supplementary firing on the performance of fossil fuel fired combined cycles have been analyzed. Both natural gas fired combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated coal gasification combined cycle (IGCC) have been considered in the study. The efficiency of the NGCC plant monotonically reduces with the increase in supplementary firing, while for the IGCC plant the maximum plant efficiency occurs at an optimum degree of supplementary firing. This difference in the nature of variation of the efficiency of two plants under the influence of supplementary firing has been critically analyzed in the paper. The ratings of different plant equipments, fuel flow rates and the emission indices of CO₂ from the plants at varying degree of supplementary firing have been evaluated for a net power output of 200 MW. The fraction of total power generated by the bottoming cycle increases with the increase in supplementary firing. However, the decrease in the ratings of gas turbines is much more than the increase in that of the steam turbines due to the low work ratio of the topping cycle. The NGCC plants require less biomass compared to the IGCC under identical condition. A critical degree of supplementary firing has been identified for the slag free operation of the biomass combustor. The performance parameters, equipment ratings and fuel flow rates for no supplementary firing and for the critical degree of supplementary biomass firing have been compared for the NGCC and IGCC plants.     

A system performance and economics analysis of IGCC with supercritical steam bottom cycle supplied with varying blends of coal and biomass feedstock

In recent years, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Technology (IGCC) has been gaining popularity for use in clean coal power operations with carbon capture and sequestration. Great efforts have been continuously spent on investigating ways to improve the efficiency and further reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of such plants. This study focuses on investigating two approaches to achieve these goals. First, replace the traditional subcritical Rankine cycle portion of the overall plant with a supercritical steam cycle. Second, add biomass as co‐feedstock to reduce carbon footprint as well as SO_x and NO_x emissions. In fact, plants that use biomass alone can be carbon neutral and even become carbon negative if CO₂ is captured. Due to a limited supply of feedstock, biomass plants are usually small, which results in higher capital and production costs. In addition, biomass can only be obtained at specific times in the year, resulting in fairly low capacity factors. Considering these challenges, it is more economically attractive and less technically challenging to co‐gasify biomass wastes with coal. The results show that for supercritical IGCC, the net efficiency increases with increased biomass in all cases. For both subcritical and supercritical cases, the efficiency increases from 0% to 10% (wt.) biomass and decreases thereafter. However, the efficiency of the blended cases always remains higher than that of the pure‐coal baseline cases. The emissions (NO_x, SO_x, and effective CO₂) and the capital costs decrease as biomass ratio (BMR) increases, but the cost of electricity (CoE) increases with BMR due to the high cost of the biomass used. Finally, implementing a supercritical steam cycle is shown to increase the net plant output power by 13% and the thermal efficiency by about 1.6 percentage points (or 4.56%) with a 6.7% reduction in capital cost, and a 3.5% decrease in CoE. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage

The evaluation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from power generation with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical factor in energy and policy analysis. The current paper examines life cycle emissions from three types of fossil-fuel-based power plants, namely supercritical pulverized coal (super-PC), natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), with and without CCS. Results show that, for a 90% CO₂ capture efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions are reduced by 75–84% depending on what technology is used. With GHG emissions less than 170 g/kWh, IGCC technology is found to be favorable to NGCC with CCS. Sensitivity analysis reveals that, for coal power plants, varying the CO₂ capture efficiency and the coal transport distance has a more pronounced effect on life cycle GHG emissions than changing the length of CO₂ transport pipeline. Finally, it is concluded from the current study that while the global warming potential is reduced when MEA-based CO₂ capture is employed, the increase in other air pollutants such as NO_x and NH₃ leads to higher eutrophication and acidification potentials.     

CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle

This paper presents the results of technical and economic studies in order to evaluate, in the French context, the future production cost of electricity from IGCC coal power plants with CO₂ capture and the resulting cost per tonne of CO₂ avoided. The economic evaluation shows that the total cost of base load electricity produced in France by coal IGCC power plants with CO₂ capture could be increased by 39% for ‘classical’ IGCC and 28% for ‘advanced’ IGCC. The cost per tonne of avoided CO₂ is lower by 18% in ‘advanced’ IGCC relatively to ‘classical’ IGCC. The approach aimed to be as realistic as possible for the evaluation of the energy penalty due to the integration of CO₂ capture in IGCC power plants. Concerning the CO₂ capture, six physical and chemical absorption processes were modeled with the Aspen Plus™ software. After a selection based on energy performance three processes were selected and studied in detail: two physical processes based on methanol and Selexol™ solvents, and a chemical process using activated MDEA. For ‘advanced’ IGCC operating at high-pressure, only one physical process is assessed: methanol.     

Recovery of CO2 with MEA and K2CO3 absorption in the IGCC system

Recovery of CO₂ with monoethanolamine (MEA) and hot potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃) absorption processes in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant was studied for the purpose of development of greenhouse gas control technology. Based on energy and exergy analysis of the two systems, improvement options were provided to further reduce energy penalty for the CO₂ separation in the IGCC system. In the improvement options, the energy consumption for CO₂ separation is reduced by about 32%. As a result, the thermal efficiency of IGCC system is increased by 2.15 percentage‐point for the IGCC system with MEA absorption, and by 1.56 percentage‐point for the IGCC system with K₂CO₃ absorption. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Evaluation of power generation schemes based on hydrogen-fuelled combined cycle with carbon capture and storage (CCS)

IGCC is a power generation technology in which the solid feedstock is partially oxidized to produce syngas. In a modified IGCC design for carbon capture, there are several technological options which are evaluated in this paper. The first two options involve pre-combustion arrangements in which syngas is processed, either by shift conversion or chemical looping, to maximise the hydrogen level and to concentrate the carbon species as CO₂. After CO₂ capture by gas-liquid absorption or chemical looping, the hydrogen-rich gas is used for power generation. The third capture option is based on post-combustion arrangement using chemical absorption.Investigated coal-based IGCC case studies produce 400-500 MW net power with more than 90% carbon capture rate. Principal focus of the paper is concentrated on evaluation of key performance indicators for investigated carbon capture options, the influence of various gasifiers on carbon capture process, optimisation of energy efficiency by heat and power integration, quality specification of captured CO₂. The capture option with minimal energy penalty is based on chemical looping, followed by pre-combustion and post-combustion.     

The air membrane-ATR integrated gas turbine power cycle: A method for producing electricity with low CO2 emissions

The air membrane-auto thermal reforming (AM-ATR) gas turbine cycle combines features of the R-ATR power cycle, introduced at the University of Florence, with ceramic, air separation membranes to achieve a novel combined cycle process with fuel decarbonisation and near-zero CO₂ emissions. Within this process, the natural gas fuel is converted to H₂ and CO through the auto thermal reforming process (ATR), i.e. combined partial oxidation and steam methane reforming, within the air separation membrane reactor. In a subsequent process unit, the H₂ content of the reformed fuel is enriched by the well known CO–CO₂ shift reaction. This fuel is then sent to an amine based carbon dioxide removal unit and, finally, to two combustors: the first one is located upstream of the membrane reformer (in order to achieve the required working temperature) and the second one is downstream of the membrane to reach the desired turbine inlet temperature (TIT).The main advantage of the proposed concept over other decarbonisation processes is the coupling of the membrane and the ATR reactor. This coupling greatly reduces the mass flow of syngas with respect to the air blown ATR contained in the previously proposed R-ATR, thus lowering the size of the syngas treatment section. Furthermore, as the oxygen production is integrated at high temperatures in the power cycle, the efficiency penalty of producing oxygen is much smaller than for the traditional cryogenic oxygen separation. The main advantages over other integrated GT-membrane concepts are the lower membrane operating temperature, lower levels of required air separation at high partial pressure driving forces (leading to lower membrane surface areas) and the possibility to achieve a higher TIT with top firing without increasing CO₂ emissions. When compared to power plants with tail end CO₂ separation, the CO₂ removal process treats a gas at pressure and with a significantly higher CO₂ concentration than that of gas turbine exhausts, which allows a compact carbon dioxide removal unit with a lower energy penalty.Starting from the same basis, various configurations were considered and optimised, all of which targeted a 65 MW power output combined cycle. The efficiency level achieved is around 45% (including recompression of the separated CO₂), which is roughly 10% less than the reference GT-CC plant (without CO₂ removal). A significant part of the efficiency penalty (4.3–5.6% points) is due to the fuel reforming, whereas further penalties come from the recompression units, loss of working fluid through the expander and the steam extracted for the ATR reactor and CO₂ separation. The specific CO₂ emissions of the MCM-ATR are about 120 kg CO₂/kWh, representing 30% of the emissions without CO₂ removal. This may be reduced to 10–15% with a better design of the shift reactors and the CO₂ removal unit. Compared to other concepts with air membrane technology, such as the AZEP concept, the efficiency loss is much greater when used for fuel de-carbonisation than for previous integration options.     

Techno‐economic analysis of biomass/coal Co‐gasification IGCC systems with supercritical steam bottom cycle and carbon capture

In recent years, integrated gasification combined cycle technology has been gaining steady popularity for use in clean coal power operations with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). This study focuses on investigating two approaches to improve efficiency and further reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. First, replace the traditional subcritical Rankine steam cycle portion of the overall plant with a supercritical steam cycle. Second, add different amounts of biomass as feedstock to reduce emissions. Employing biomass as a feedstock has the advantage of being carbon neutral or even carbon negative if CCS is implemented. However, due to limited feedstock supply, such plants are usually small (2–50 MW), which results in lower efficiency and higher capital and production costs. Considering these challenges, it is more economically attractive and less technically challenging to co‐combust or co‐gasify biomass wastes with low‐rank coals. Using the commercial software, Thermoflow®, this study analyzes the baseline plants around 235 MW and 267 MW for the subcritical and supercritical designs, respectively. Both post‐combustion and pre‐combustion CCS conditions are considered. The results clearly show that utilizing a certain type of biomass with low‐rank coals up to 50% (wt.) can, in most cases, not only improve the efficiency and reduce overall emissions but may be economically advantageous, as well. Beyond a 10% Biomass Ratio, however, the efficiency begins to drop due to the rising pretreatment costs, but the system itself still remains more efficient than from using coal alone (between 0.2 and 0.3 points on average). The CO₂ emissions decrease by about 7000 tons/MW‐year compared to the baseline (no biomass), making the plant carbon negative with only 10% biomass in the feedstock. In addition, implementing a supercritical steam cycle raises the efficiency (1.6 percentage points) and lowers the capital costs ($300/kW), regardless of plant layout. Implementing post‐combustion CCS consistently causes a drop in efficiency (at least 7–8 points) from the baseline and increases the costs by $3000–$4000/kW and In recent years, integrated gasification combined cycle technology has been gaining steady popularity for use in clean coal power operations with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). This study focuses on investigating two approaches to improve efficiency and further reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. First, replace the traditional subcritical Rankine steam cycle portion of the overall plant with a supercritical steam cycle. Second, add different amounts of biomass as feedstock to reduce emissions. Employing biomass as a feedstock has the advantage of being carbon neutral or even carbon negative if CCS is implemented. However, due to limited feedstock supply, such plants are usually small (2–50 MW), which results in lower efficiency and higher capital and production costs. Considering these challenges, it is more economically attractive and less technically challenging to co‐combust or co‐gasify biomass wastes with low‐rank coals. Using the commercial software, Thermoflow®, this study analyzes the baseline plants around 235 MW and 267 MW for the subcritical and supercritical designs, respectively. Both post‐combustion and pre‐combustion CCS conditions are considered. The results clearly show that utilizing a certain type of biomass with low‐rank coals up to 50% (wt.) can, in most cases, not only improve the efficiency and reduce overall emissions but may be economically advantageous, as well. Beyond a 10% Biomass Ratio, however, the efficiency begins to drop due to the rising pretreatment costs, but the system itself still remains more efficient than from using coal alone (between 0.2 and 0.3 points on average). The CO₂ emissions decrease by about 7000 tons/MW‐year compared to the baseline (no biomass), making the plant carbon negative with only 10% biomass in the feedstock. In addition, implementing a supercritical steam cycle raises the efficiency (1.6 percentage points) and lowers the capital costs ($300/kW), regardless of plant layout. Implementing post‐combustion CCS consistently causes a drop in efficiency (at least 7–8 points) from the baseline and increases the costs by $3000–$4000/kW and $0.06–$0.07/kW‐h. The SO_x emissions also decrease by about 190 tons/year (7.6 × 10^?6 tons/MW‐year). Finally, the CCS cost is around $65–$72 per ton of CO₂. For pre‐combustion CCS, sour shift appears to be superior both economically and thermally to sweet shift in the current study. Sour shift is always cheaper, (by a difference of about $600/kW and $0.02‐$0.03/kW‐h), easier to implement, and also 2–3 percentage points more efficient. The economic difference is fairly marginal, but the trend is inversely proportional to the efficiency, with cost of electricity decreasing by 0.5 cents/kW‐h from 0% to 10% biomass ratio (BMR) and rising 2.5 cents/kW‐h from 10% to 50% BMR. Pre‐combustion CCS plants are smaller than post‐combustion ones and usually require 25% less energy for CCS due to their compact size for processing fuel flow only under higher pressure (450 psi), versus processing the combusted gases at near‐atmospheric pressure. Finally, the CO₂ removal cost for sour shift is around $20/ton, whereas sweet shift's cost is around $30/ton, which is much cheaper than that of post‐combustion CCS: about $60–$70/ton. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation system

Supplementary firing is adopted in combined‐cycle power plants to reheat low‐temperature gas turbine exhaust before entering into the heat recovery steam generator. In an effort to identify suitable supplementary firing options in an integrated gasification combined‐cycle (IGCC) power plant configuration, so as to use coal effectively, the performance is compared for three different supplementary firing options. The comparison identifies the better of the supplementary firing options based on higher efficiency and work output per unit mass of coal and lower CO₂ emissions. The three supplementary firing options with the corresponding fuel used for the supplementary firing are: (i) partial gasification with char, (ii) full gasification with coal and (iii) full gasification with syngas. The performance of the IGCC system with these three options is compared with an option of the IGCC system without supplementary firing. Each supplementary firing option also involves pre‐heating of the air entering the gas turbine combustion chamber in the gas cycle and reheating of the low‐pressure steam in the steam cycle. The effects on coal consumption and CO₂ emissions are analysed by varying the operating conditions such as pressure ratio, gas turbine inlet temperature, air pre‐heat and supplementary firing temperature. The results indicate that more work output is produced per unit mass of coal when there is no supplementary firing. Among the supplementary firing options, the full gasification with syngas option produces the highest work output per unit mass of coal, and the partial gasification with char option emits the lowest amount of CO₂ per unit mass of coal. Based on the analysis, the most advantageous option for low specific coal consumption and CO₂ emissions is the supplementary firing case having full gasification with syngas as the fuel. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Thermoeconomic evaluation of CO2 alkali absorption system applied to semi-closed gas turbine combined cycle

A new carbon dioxide separation system based on CO₂ absorption in aqueous solutions of alkaline salts (sodium and potassium carbonate) was studied with reference to semi-closed gas turbine/combined cycle (SCGT/CC), and compared to results obtained with existing technologies. Use of calcium hydroxide for the regeneration of the exhaust solution was studied in order to obtain a tail-end product, calcium carbonate in the form of precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) with a wide spread and continuously growing market. The alkali CO₂ absorption process was compared with a conventional amine absorption process (DEA+MDEA), referring to the same SCGT/CC based on the same CO₂ removal efficiency. The comparison allows foregrounding of the possible goals of the CO₂ alkali absorption process with respect to previous amine cycle analyses. The modeling approach focuses on a thermodynamical and economical first comparison of the proposed cycle to previous studies carried out on CO₂ absorption (Energy Convers. Manage. 40 (1999) 1917; Absorption of CO₂ with amines in a semi closed GT cycle: plant performance and operating costs, ASME Paper 98-GT-395, American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME Publishing, New York, 1998; Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Interlaken, Switzerland, Pergamon, Oxford, 1999).     

CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost

As part of the USDOE's Carbon Sequestration Program, an integrated modeling framework has been developed to evaluate the performance and cost of alternative carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for fossil-fueled power plants in the context of multi-pollutant control requirements. This paper uses the newly developed model of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant to analyze the effects of adding CCS to an IGCC system employing a GE quench gasifier with water gas shift reactors and a Selexol system for CO₂ capture. Parameters of interest include the effects on plant performance and cost of varying the CO₂ removal efficiency, the quality and cost of coal, and selected other factors affecting overall plant performance and cost. The stochastic simulation capability of the model is also used to illustrate the effect of uncertainties or variability in key process and cost parameters. The potential for advanced oxygen production and gas turbine technologies to reduce the cost and environmental impacts of IGCC with CCS is also analyzed.     

Techno-economic evaluation of the evaporative gas turbine cycle with different CO2 capture options

The techno-economic evaluation of the evaporative gas turbine (EvGT) cycle with two different CO₂ capture options has been carried out. Three studied systems include a reference system: the EvGT system without CO₂ capture (System I), the EvGT system with chemical absorption capture (System II), and the EvGT system with oxyfuel combustion capture (System III). The cycle simulation results show that the system with chemical absorption has a higher electrical efficiency (41.6% of NG LHV) and a lower efficiency penalty caused by CO₂ capture (10.5% of NG LHV) compared with the system with oxyfuel combustion capture. Based on a gas turbine of 13.78 MW, the estimated costs of electricity are 46.1 $/MW h for System I, while 70.1 $/MW h and 74.1 $/MW h for Systems II and III, respectively. It shows that the cost of electricity increment of chemical absorption is 8.7% points lower than that of the option of oxyfuel combustion. In addition, the cost of CO₂ avoidance of System II which is 71.8 $/tonne CO₂ is also lower than that of System III, which is 73.2 $/tonne CO₂. The impacts of plant size have been analyzed as well. Results show that cost of CO₂ avoidance of System III may be less than that of System II when a plant size is larger than 60 MW.     

Life cycle inventory analysis for electricity in Korea

A life cycle inventory analysis (LCI) database that encompasses the entire Korean electrical energy grid was developed. The CO₂ emission per functional unit of electricity, 1 kWh of usable electricity, was 0.49 kg/f.u. Contribution of direct emission of CO₂ to the total CO₂ emission was around 95%. In the case of emissions of SO_x, NO_x, and PM, contribution of the upstream processes including raw energy material extraction, transport, and fuel processing to the total emissions were 29%, 26%, and 43%, respectively. Emissions of air pollutants from power generation or direct emissions are much greater in quantity than those from the upstream processes. On the other hand, the opposite is true for the emissions of water pollutants. Bituminous coal was the largest source of emissions of air and water pollutants including CO₂. Natural gas was the best fuel and anthracite coal was the worst fuel with respect to the direct and upstream emissions of air and water pollutants and wastes.     

Hydrogen production from coal gasification for effective downstream CO2 capture

The coal gasification process is used in commercial production of synthetic gas as a means toward clean use of coal. The conversion of solid coal into a gaseous phase creates opportunities to produce more energy forms than electricity (which is the case in coal combustion systems) and to separate CO₂ in an effective manner for sequestration. The current work compares the energy and exergy efficiencies of an integrated coal-gasification combined-cycle power generation system with that of coal gasification-based hydrogen production system which uses water-gas shift and membrane reactors. Results suggest that the syngas-to-hydrogen (H₂) system offers 35% higher energy and 17% higher exergy efficiencies than the syngas-to-electricity (IGCC) system. The specific CO₂ emission from the hydrogen system was 5% lower than IGCC system. The Brayton cycle in the IGCC system draws much nitrogen after combustion along with CO₂. Thus CO₂ capture and compression become difficult due to the large volume of gases involved, unlike the hydrogen system which has 80% less nitrogen in its exhaust stream. The extra electrical power consumption for compressing the exhaust gases to store CO₂ is above 70% for the IGCC system but is only 4.5% for the H₂ system. Overall the syngas-to-hydrogen system appears advantageous to the IGCC system based on the current analysis.     

Clean coal technology development in China

Coal is found in huge amounts throughout the world and is expected to play a crucial role as an abundant energy source. However, one critical issue in promoting coal utilization is controlling environmental pollution. Clean coal technologies are needed to utilize coal in an environmentally acceptable way and to improve coal utilization efficiency. This paper describes coal's role in China's energy system and the environmental issues related to coal use. Coal is responsible for 90% of the SO₂ emissions, 70% of the dust emissions, 67% of the NO_x emissions, and 70% of the CO₂ emissions. But as the most abundant energy resource, it will continue to be the dominant energy supply for a long time. Therefore, the development and deployment of clean coal technologies are crucial to promote sustainable development in China. Clean coal technologies currently being developed in China are described including high efficiency combustion and advanced power generation technologies, coal transformation technologies, IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and carbon capture and storage (CCS). Although China only recently began developing clean coal technologies, there have been many successes. Most recent orders of coal-fired power plants are units larger than 600 MW and new orders for supercritical and ultra supercritical systems are increasing rapidly. Many national research programs, industrial research programs and international collaboration projects have been launched to develop on IGCC and CCS systems in China. Finally, suggestions are given on how to further promote clean coal technologies in China.     

Carbon dioxide removal in power generation using membrane technology

Carbon dioxide separation by means of membranes from methane reformed synthesis gas and from semi-closed cycle flue gases has been studied. In the first case, removing carbon dioxide using membrane is more energy consuming than removing it, from the same synthesis gas, using chemical absorption, leading to overall energy conversion efficiency of about 39% for the recuperated-auto thermal reforming (R-ATR) cycle equipped with membrane vs. 45% for the same R-ATR equipped with chemical absorption. With reference to the semi-closed cycle, the net cycle efficiency in the case of membrane removal (42.7%) seems to be not very far from the chemical absorption case (46%). Finally, published data about CO₂ membrane separation specific cost have been analysed, showing that the membrane technology for flue gas application can be competitive with respect to chemical absorption if CO₂ flue gas concentration is higher than 10%.     

Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal

This study is devoted to technical evaluation of a carbon dioxide removal in an existing Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant. This IGCC case is based on an oxygen blown entrained flow gasifier operating at 27 bar, the removal of acid gas (H₂S) is performed with MDEA unit, the efficiency of this IGCC is 43% based on the low heating value (LHV) of coal. A carbon dioxide separation unit conveniently integrated in a pre-combustion separation process is chosen, in order to take advantage of the high pressure of the gas. The methanol process for carbon dioxide removal is integrated downstream the existing desulfuration unit, and after a CO shift conversion unit. In this study, the integration of the CO₂ capture process to the IGCC is simulated as realistically as possible. The design parameters of both the gas turbine (the turbine inlet temperature, compressor pressure ratio, reduced flow rate) and the steam turbine (Stodola parameter) are taken into account. Maintenance of low _NOx${\mathrm{NO}}_x$ production in the combustion chamber is also considered. The production of _NOx${\mathrm{NO}}_x$ is supposed to be influenced by the low heating value of the gas which is maintained as low as for case of the synthesis gas without CO₂ capture. Thus the choice is made to feed the gas turbine of the combined cycle with a diluted synthesis gas, having similar low heating value than the one produced without the CO₂ capture. Plant performances for different conversion and capture rates are compared. A final optimized integration is given for 92 mol% CO conversion rate and 95 mol% CO₂ absorption rates, a comparison with former studies is proposed.     

Assessment of cleaner electricity generation technologies for net CO2 mitigation in Thailand

The choice of electricity generation technologies not only directly affects the amount of CO₂ emission from the power sector, but also indirectly affects the economy-wide CO₂ emission. It is because electricity is the basic requirement of economic sectors and final consumptions within the economy. In Thailand, although the power development plan (PDP) has been planned for the committed capacity to meet the future electricity demand, there are some undecided electricity generation technologies that will be studied for technological options. The economy-wide CO₂ mitigations between selecting cleaner power generation options instead of pulverized coal-thermal technology of the undecided capacity are assessed by energy input–output analysis (IOA). The decomposition of IOA presents the fuel-mix effect, input structural effect, and final demand effect by the change in technology of the undecided capacity. The cleaner technologies include biomass power generation, hydroelectricity and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC). Results of the analyses show that if the conventional pulverized coal technology is selected in the undecided capacity, the economy-wide CO₂ emission would be increased from 223 million ton in 2006 to 406 million ton in 2016. Renewable technology presents better mitigation option for replacement of conventional pulverized coal technology than the cleaner coal technology. The major contributor of CO₂ mitigation in cleaner coal technology is the fuel mix effect due to higher conversion efficiency. The demand effect is the major contributor of CO₂ mitigation in the biomass and hydro cases. The embedded emission in construction of power plant contributes to higher CO₂ emission.     

Thermodynamic performance assessment and comparison of IGCC with solid cycling process for CO2 capture at high and medium temperatures

Solid sorbents can be used to capture CO₂ from pre-combustion sources at various temperatures. MgO and CaO are typical medium- and high-temperature CO₂ sorbents. However, pure MgO is not active toward CO₂. The addition of Na₂CO₃ increases the operating temperature and significantly increases the reactivity of sorbents to capture CO₂. Na₂CO₃-promoted MgO is a promising medium-temperature CO₂ sorbent. In this study, the thermodynamic performance of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems with Na₂CO₃–MgO-based warm gas decarbonation (WGDC) and CaO-based hot gas decarbonation (HGDC) is evaluated and compared with that of an IGCC system with methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)-based cold gas decarbonation (CGDC). Assuming that the average CO₂ capture capacities of solid sorbents are one-third of their theoretical maxima, we reveal that the IGCC system undergoes approximately 2.8% and 3.6% improvement on net efficiency when switching from CGDC to WGDC and to HGDC, respectively. The net efficiency of the system is increased by improving the CO₂ capture capacity of the sorbent. The IGCC with Na₂CO₃–MgO experiences more significant increase in efficiency than that with CaO along with the improvement of sorbent average CO₂ capture capacity. The efficiency of the IGCC systems reaches the same value when the average CO₂ capture capacities of both sorbents are 53% of their theoretical levels. The effects of gas turbine combustor fuel gas inlet temperature on IGCC system performance are analyzed. Results show that the efficiency of the IGCC systems with HGDC and WGDC increases by 0.74% and 0.53% respectively as the fuel gas inlet temperature increases from 250 °C to 650 °C.